I am a slick CON-MAN with alotta rich people behind him who have covered my illicit past- I NEVER miss an opportunity for the TV spotlight because my likeability covers my CRIMINAL past and people ignore my multiple SSN's and the FORGED birth certificate- EVERY word from my mouth is a LIE- I am the most secretive of ALL presidents- Every part of my past has been hidden or destroyed at great expense- I even surrendered my LAW license to avoid investigation- I AM THE BIGGEST FRAUD OF ALL TIME-
According to the CATO Institute, when adjusted for inflation, non-defense, non-interest spending increased by 5.4% per year under George W. Bush. Under Clinton, it increased by 2.9% annually. Under Reagan, it increased by only 1% a year. Therefore, Reagan was a true fiscal conservative, despite the attacks by the left over his deficit spending. America needs another Reagan.
@Edgehead10075 IF YOU REALLY THINK THAT YOU NEED TO LOOK UP TEFRA PASSED REAGAN IN HIS SECOND YEAR THE LARGEST TAX INCREASE IN PEACETIME HISTORY TAKING BACK SOME OF HIS TOP INCOME TAX CUTS IN BACKDOOR INCREASES ON DIVIDENDS, SAVINGS. AND TAX INCREASES ON BIZ ,AND ON MIDDLE INCOME. OF COURSE YOU NEVER HEAR THE RIGHT MENTIONING TEFRA TAX INCREASES, OR THE FACT THAT UNEMPLOYMENT WENT AS HIGH AS 10.9% BEFORE the tax increase after his intial 1rst yr. big tax cuts for top income. LMAO
@barsense Perhaps you are unaware that Paul Volker had raised interest rates to 14%, before Reagan inaugurated? I wonder, what would happen to the economy, today, if the Fed raised rates to 14%? Starting today, with 8.8% unemployment, do you think the collapse would stay at the 10.9% rate??? STUPID.
The GOP needs a REAL CONSERVATIVE in 2012. We (the base) want spending cuts and a budget surplus. Bush failed. Obviously, Obama is failing. It's time for someone to LEAD.
What caused the deficit was the tremendous increase in defense spending. Many conservatives have excused Reagan for that in light of the fact that we were fighting a Cold War. Some would credit this spending for winning the Cold War. As a Governor, Reagan turned deficits into surpluses, which would seem to indicate that he theoretically believed in balanced budgets.
@Edgehead10075 Unemployment was in the 7% range when Reagan was inaugarated. AFTER Reagan tax cuts unemployed continued to ESCALATE until by his SECOND YEAR GET IT , NOT HIS FIRST YEAR , REAGANS slowly now read HIS SECOND YEAR UNEMPLOYMENT WAS OVER 10% FOR 10 MONTHS ESCALATING UNTIL IT REACHED 10.9% IT WAS ONLY AFTER REAGAN read slowly now PASSED THE BIGGEST TAX INCREASE IN PEACETIME HISTORY TAKING BACK MUCH OF HIS INITIAL 1RST YR. TAX CUTS THAT UNEMPLOYMENT DECREASED
Okay, but that doesn't prove that it was the tax cuts that caused more unemployment. (Why would cutting taxes increase unemployment?) Figuring out cause and effect in economics is kind of tricky, and it takes time for tax cuts to have their effect. Also, why was unemployment high to begin with?
Pardon me for changing the subject, but I have an interesting question. Why do liberals generally respect Ron Paul (as evidenced during the '08 GOP primaries) yet despise Rand Paul? The two of the them are basically the same.
@barsense I do not know ANY progressives or democrats that are very fond of Ron Paul. there are some far left where the right meets the left and it is hard to tell the difference that favor Ron Paul but that is only because they have never studied his voting record. If they did they would not care for him anymore than I do. Ron Paul votes against average working people on EVERYTHING. Ron Paul always votes for corporations and the elite and they way he votes makes what he says LIES.
The people of the US must reject the tax cuts for the rich and super-rich. The income disparity is grotesque and ruinous to the ambitions and survival of the general public. The children of the US should not be paying debts caused by the current wealthy capitalist exploiters in Congress and business. "Senator Bernie Sanders Denounces Obama-GOP Tax Cut" has lots of details about the looting of the American public by the super rich: youtube . com / watch?v=krmH5IlHjz8
The use of automobiles by US drivers and other gasoline-addicted people in the world constitutes a 'pollution bomb', for which the world is suffering greatly, and it will get much worse as climate disruption escalates. 'Terrorism' is a fabrication and provocation by the military-industrial-congressional complex to keep people enslaved to their criminal imperialist looting of resources and wasteful urban 'design'. Puppets of the automobile/oil/asphalt/concrete industries, free yourselves.
@gregjalbert how is exactly terrorism keeping people enslaved to "their criminal imperialist looting"? Do you mean that people pollute and do what they do, because they are afraid of terrorists?
@bishopm5 NO Thanks on repealing, I would rather not go back to paying ceo's of insurance corporations 12 to 24 million a year just to find new ways to keep from paying for the healthcare that my premiums are supposed to cover.
@Edgehead10075 The supreme court really does not have a leg to stand on to repeal it, GET OVER IT .in the healthcare reform bill it clearly states that any state that can do it better and cheaper CAN DO IT THEIR WAY.
One judge has already struck it down. The mandate is unconstitutional. There's also no interstate commerce affected since you can't buy health insurance across state lines.
@Edgehead10075 It is 2 for 2 right now and the Florida judge did not follow precedent so that makes his judgement highly questionable and rather easy to defeat. He threw the whole bill out and certainly not all of it could even be remotely questioned and that is not judicial procedure. Procedure requires keeping as much of any bill as possible. And we have all kinds of mandates some state, some local, etc etc. and certainly fed can mandate if state and local can.
The law doesn't have a clause in it allowing the other parts of the bill to remain law if one part is struck down. If one part is struck down, the entire law is struck down. Also, the Supreme Court is majority conservative.
The mandate is unconstitutional because simply existing (the reason for being forced to buy private health insurance plans) doesn't affect interstate commerce. States have more freedom under their constitutions.
There are many things troubling about Obamacare. Another thing is that it requires certain businesses to cover healthcare for their employees or pay a penalty. Healthcare really shouldn't be tied to private employers (unless they want to cover their employees), and it passes the costs onto consumers.
@Edgehead10075 As a small business owner I am hoping the reform will pass as is. the exchanges in 2014 will for the first time offer discounted insurance rates for small biz like large biz has always gotten. This along with the new healthcare tax credits will allow many small biz to be able to offer health insurance to employees and at less expensive share costs at that. The penalties only apply to employers with over 50 employees and most already offer ins. anyway.
1. It needs a severability clause. Read "Obamacare: D.O.A." on dick morris dot com. It's dated February 1.
2. We don't even have a free market. You can't even cross state lines to buy health insurance. Insurance companies shouldn't be forced by law to give discounts.
@Edgehead10075 LMAO, great plan haha, as if insurance companies really will negotiate with small biz . hahahahhahahahahhahahahahhahahahhahahahahhahahhahahhahhahahahhahahahhahahahahhahahahhaha
That shouldn't be my problem or the government's. Then don't offer healthcare if you can't afford it. Health insurance would probably cost less anyway if we lifted regulations.
@barsense I have an individual policy, I`m 59, its for my wife and I together, and it costs $300 mo. I also am at a 150% rate, because of preexisting conditions. It just paid off $140,000 for my back surgery. You are so full of shit.hahahahhahahahahhahahahahhahahahhahahahahhahahhahahhahhahahahhahahahhahahahahhahahahhahahahahahhahahahahhahahahahhahahhahahahhahahahahhahahahahhahahahhahahahahhahahhahahhahhahahahhahahahhahahahahhahahahhahahahahahahhahahahhaha. Asshole.
@luvcheney1 Hey clueless if more and more people continue to add to the list of uninsured then your prices are going to keep going up until you become one of the uninsured. . Wake up stupid. The more people that have insurance the cheaper insurance is for everyone , young and healthy and old and pre-exisiting. Get a goddam clue or shutup because your ignorance is apalling.
@barsense More people on insurance does NOT necessarily mean lower prices for the insurance. It depends on the health risks of those added. Young, and healthy people are not as likely to voluntarily purchase insurance, and their presence in the "pool" would reduce costs, because THEY would get SCREWED in the deal ( paying in more than getting in help). You cant pile in a bunch of SICK, pre-existing, old, people in NEED of help, and lower costs, you must RAPE financially the young and healthy.
@luvcheney1 You still do not have a clue and your arguments are falacious BS. Idiot fool insurance companies will offer lower premiums to young and heatlhy to compete to get more of them in their insurance pools regardless of whether there are mandates or not and getting more insured lowers the costs for everyone and stupid ignoramous if this is not done it will get to the point where idiot ignorant fools like you can not afford insurance either and prices will be higher for young anyway
@barsense Please explain how adding more people into the pool lowers the costs for everyone, UNLESS those new people are going to be charged in EXCESS of their own medical RISKS, therefore paying more than they should to pay for others. Insurance "pools" are rated as to the chances of costs to the insurer, and then operating costs are added. Each age group has its own price. So, each "pool" insures itself, according to risk. More people CAN lower costs ONLY IF they are overcharged.
@luvcheney1 If you can not understand the concept that insurance was developed on in the very beginning with the very first insurance company ever started in this country of getting as many people as possible in a pool paying premiums so that there would be money on hand for those who were unfortunate enough to suffer a tragedy and need to file a claim then I can NOT explain it to you.
@barsense You have to charge enough of the "pool" to pay all claims, plus the administration of it. Now, you have said that adding MORE workers would reduce THAT cost. It could all right, but ONLY if the newly insured were charged MORE than their likely costs, plus Admin! My insurance co has doubled deductibles ($7000 to 12000) AND after deductible, pay now 70% instead of 100%! Thanks Obama! Preexisting conditions, no limits, kids till 26, cost money, STUPID.
You shouldn't even have to offer your employees health insurance if you don't want to. Health insurance shouldn't be tied to places of employment. Liberals whine about HMO's, but the Democrats were the ones who created them.
Obamacare is unconstitutional, and it does nothing about the cost of healthcare. America needs to start over (with a new President).
@Edgehead10075 MSM behind reform now that is the biggest joke of the YEAR if you really believe that you are very very uninformed about what is actually in the healthcare reform bill because msm has not reported the FACTS AT ALL. they have reported conservative lies mostly. BET YOU don't even know that when the healthcare exchanges kick in small biz will for the first time be able to purchase at discounted rates like large biz has always gotten and that will decrease employee costs ???
@Edgehead10075 BTW, all biz with less than 50 employees is exempt from the healthcare reform changes it does not effect them and if you know of any corp with more than 50 employees that does not already offer heatlh insurance I would be very surprised. I don't know of any myself. Reform just gives lower profit margin small biz with the new healthcare tax credits and exchanges the ability to purchase for employees and costs will be cheaper for employees.
@Edgehead10075 Obviously you are misinformed. standard procedure is to only strike down parts of a bill and pass as much as is possible. Anyway we wll see how it goes in the supreme courts final decision which will be up to them to decide whether it is constitutional or not. some will say yes others will say no and it depends on the majority whihc is conservative so there is a possibility parts will be considered unconstitutional.
@barsense Why? Are you nuts? There is NO severability clause in it, and even if there were, Obamacare would be DEAD if forcing people to buy a service is unConstitutional. It will be bankrupt, if people are not made to buy.
@luvcheney1 You need to read the bill before you go spouting off about severability clause uninformed mislead and confused person that you are it might not help though because you probably don't have the cognitive abiltiy to decipher and discriminate crucial differences anyway. .
@barsense From the "Washington Post", “there was no ’severability’ clause written into this law, which shows how amateurish the process was,” he wrote. “Virtually every bill I’ve ever read includes a provision that if any part of the law is ruled unconstitutional the rest of the law will remain intact. Not this one. That will likely mean that the entire law will be thrown out if a part of it is found to violate the Constitution.”
@barsense From ABC News, Feb 3, 2011, "“First, the Act does not contain a ‘severability clause,’ which is commonly included in legislation,” Vinson wrote. “The lack of a severability clause in this case is significant because one had been included in an earlier version of the Act, but it was removed in the bill that subsequently became law". Hey STUPID, cant you Google??
@luvcheney1 Yes idiot I can google but I don't google msm which rarely is dependable , I google the actual legislation and read it , if you tried that once in awhile yourself you would not always be QUITE SUCH AN IDIOT.
@barsense Are yousaying you know their IS a severability clause in the Legislation, because you read it? Fine! I will wait for you to cite your source, and help me read it? I want to be smart, like you. Because when I Google the subject, I find mountains of sources stating there is none. Of course, the lawsuits over Obamacare hinge on this issue, YOU are the expert. Help me over this please.
@luvcheney1 Go to govtrack.us download the PDF or go to Thomas Library and read the bill yourself and get someone to help you understand it. I would not even attempt to help you anyone who does not even understand the very most basic concept that insurance was developed upon needs specialized assistance that I am not qualified for.
@barsense I need you to refer me to the severability clause in the legislation, since you already know its there, read and understood the 2400 pages of it. OR, I would find a reference to a recent article refering to the clause, perhaps quoting it. Perhaps you may recall telling me the Saudi Prince owned "supervoting" shares? I can look all day, and not find it, because it wasnt true, nor would you back up your insistence to it. Redeem yourself, refer me to the clause.
I have an interesting question for you before I answer some of your responses. (I have tons of responses from people, so I'm backed up.) Since domestic spending under Bush grew at an incredible rate (5.4%/yr. adjusted for inflation), why don't I ever hear liberals giving him credit for being, well, a LIBERAL? Sure, liberals hated him for the war and his views on social issues, but, fiscally speaking, he was a liberal. Liberals are for increasing government, and that's what Bush did.
@Edgehead10075 Just about every cost saving measure ever introduced by any economist right and left that was given high grades for chance of working to cut costs was included in the healthcare reform bill. What we need in America is better informed voters who don't fall for the sheepstink pushed by msm with the massive conservative monopoly that they have purchased in order to convince people to cut their own throats and by your remarks you do sound like one of the Baaaa baaaa's .
What about allowing people to purchase health insurance across state lines? What about tort reform?
The MSM is 100% behind Obamacare.
I'm sure that most Americans support helping people who can't afford health insurance, but many who already have health insurance are worried how this will affect them.
I support the idea of covering those without healthcare, but I think that we should start over. If Obamacare is struck down by the courts, we will have to start over.
@Edgehead10075 LOL> msm has reported only what conservatives have wanted reported. ONE CBO said tort reform would have little effect on cost because most states already HAVE TORT REFORM. DUH competition in my repub state we can purchase from over 25 different nationwide ins. co. the cheapest policies with 10K deduct are still 300 month for private ins. INS. is cheaper in dem states & better quality, CBO said competition would decrease quality raise costs on older and sicker
@Edgehead10075 LOL> msm has reported only what conservatives have wanted reported. ONE CBO said tort reform would have little effect on cost because most states already HAVE TORT REFORM. competition in my repub state we can purchase from dozens different nationwide ins. co. the cheapest policies with 10K deduct are still 300 month for private ins. INS. is cheaper in dem states & better quality, CBO said competition would decrease quality raise costs on older and sicker and it HAS
@Edgehead10075 That shows extreme misinformed, uninformed, misled, and rather extreme and grossly inaccurate bias to say that liberals are for more government. liberals are for BETTER government which can mean more government in some cases and less government in some cases. And you should do some checking on history and statisics, REPUBLICANS have created the most government jobs and democrats have created the most private industry jobs since 1945.
We deny six-year-olds the right to carry guns. We deny rights to people who don't have the mental capacity to understand responsibilities that go with those rights. A six-year-old is not smart enough to be able to exercise the right to own a gun responsibly. What does Barack think of your mental capacity to maintain your health responsibly? Review usdebtclock()org and reconsider whether the Federal Government should be the judge when it comes to responsibility.
@luvmedo56 LOL, Only thing Obama is trying to do is make it possible for more Americans to have healthcare and pay for the increases in medicare part D prescriptions that republicans passed. If you can't afford healthcare you will not be mandated, if you don't want heatlhcare insurance, fine file the paperwork to show you can pay for your own medical expenses if something happens instead of everyone else having to pay for it and you will be exempt from mandates.
The sooner Obama, Michele, and all their dual-citizen Zionist staff and czars are gone, the better! May God hurry them along, and may they take McCain with them. And PLEASE also take with you Pelosi, Reid, Barney, Feinstein, Boxer, Snowe, Collins, and all the other long-timers. We need ONLY new blood in Congress.
Another thing, you keep parroting wrong unemployment numbers under Reagan. Reagan never saw over 10%, EVER. The highest was in 1982 @ 9.7% and 9.6% in 1983, but he averaged 7.5% throughout his Presidency. By the way, Reagan inherited a recession from Carter, but you didn't hear Reagan whine about what he "inherited", Reagan simply fixed it without excuses and with class, (Reagan is the polar opposite of Obama!)
Stop being a typical liberal, spreading lies and inaccurate information.
1983 10.4 10.4 10.3 10.2 10.1 10.1 9.4 9.5 9.2 8.8 8.5 8.3 Where did you get your info Wikipedia, lol. this came straight from the BLS website so don't call me a liar. I can back it up I will be back with a link and you can look at it yourself.
@JimFromWaterford The darn link will not post on here I will see if it will post on your channel then you can see for yourself that I am NOT parroting the wrong unemployment numbers under Reagan I AM PARROTING THE CORRECT unemployment number under Reagan.
@JimFromWaterford The link is posted on your channel look at the numbers yourself. the numbers I posted came straight from the BLS website and that is the site where other sites get their numbers from if they publish accurate numbers. This is always the original source. Bureau of Labor Statistics.
@JimFromWaterford I am not wrong or insane, try looking up the stats and numbers on sites that only offers numbers, stats, that do not give opinion or take sides. I can give you some references to some good sites if you are really interested in truth and don't want to continue to be misled.
@barsense - I guess the whole country was misled during the Carter years. I remember gas lines and severe recession. Kind of like what we have under BHO. I understand your position though, you have to find some good news somewhere. It is your job!
@JimFromWaterford Carter did start during a period of severe stagflation and the Great Oil Embargo, so it was not great for people. Plus he did some things that repubs are currently running on, cut gov.wages and cut unemployment rates trying to control deficit did not make him popular cause in reaction private industry cut wages also. BTW , the only reward I get is if dems stay in control cause I get to live in a country that is not ran by foreign owned mega corps.
@barsense Like GE? Didn't Obama give GE 24.9 MILLION dollars in Stimulus money? Didn't GE send over 18.000 jobs overseas in the same year that they had 156 BILLION in revenue? Ooooh, you're talking about the unsubstantiated claim about the Chamber of Commerce. That's pretty reckless if you are. I think the Repubs should claim Axelrod is a child molester and let him prove that he is not. That's exactly the tactic Obama and Axelrod and mindless puppets like Olberdork & Mr. Maddow are using.
@JimFromWaterford Look we gave repub policies 8 yrs. and they did NOT work simple as that. The only income level to do well was the top income, wallstreet took too many risks, etc. economy tanked. I want protectionism for American industries, I want a gov that reps for all income levels not just top income, we are a consumer based economy and the better the masses do the more consumer purchasing power, I think the dems are a better shot for what I think this country needs simple as that.
@barsense _ those are all noble, but the current batch of Dems will give you none of that. There's a reason the whole Dem party will get its ass kicked on election day!
@JimFromWaterford We have a much better shot with democrats than we do with republicans and the democrats have done better with this recession which is much more severe than the recession under Reagan where unemployment went to 10.8 % and stayed at 10% for over 10 month. I do have to admit though that the strategy of the right to smear and attack with anything they could make up out of thin air that started before Obama was even inaugated has been effective unfortunately.
@barsense - The right is "smearing" the left using only the abysmal record the left has recorded. Is it really a "smear" if it is true? Do you really believe that American's are so dumb and blind that they cannot discern failure for themselves? Do you honestly believe that American's are so weak willed that they need someone to tell them how to vote and who to vote for? It's that exact attitude that gave birth to the Tea Party. The left is responsible for its OWN FAILURES and elitist attitude.
Obama Blames Oil Companies For Lack Of Drilling... Obama blames who?
'FACTS DON'T SUPPORT' ADMIN'S CLAIMS ON DRILLING... no sh*t
Bill Clinton calls drilling delays 'ridiculous'... Bill opposing Obama (again)!
Obama: 'It Would be so Much Easier to be President of China'... all good communist should stick together because he is a failure as President of the United States.
From Harding In 1921 to Bush in 2003, Democrats held the White House for 40 years, and Republicans for 42.5 years. During this time Dem created 75,820,000 net new jobs and Repub 36,440,000.Per Year Average : Dem = 1,825,200 new jobs vs. Repub = 856,400 new jobs There was either a depression or recession during the administrations of 6 of the 9 Repub presidents The DOW grew by 52% more under Dems, and GDP grew by 26.4% more under Dems
@JimFromWaterford The mindless sheep I have seen have mostly been on the right just constantly repeating false rhetoric and using key manipulation brainwashing words like socialism etc. without ever being able to even explain what it means to them. They certainly can not give any really valid defense for their stance without using fabrication. And most of what they claim is better for this country has already been proven that it DID NOT WORK and was worse for this country.
@barsense - OK, that is your twisted slant on America, but answer this. Since the government has been controlled by Democrats since Jan. 2007, (House & Senate, who make and pass all laws), and dominated by Democrats since Jan. 2009, what has improved?
ANSWER: NOTHING! As a matter of fact, everything is worse. The House & Senate have record low ratings, Democrats are hated throughout the country and Obama's approval falls daily. So before you pick on the right, you better look in the mirror.
@JimFromWaterford No twisted slant about it. You just need to do some research and compare unemployment of this recessession with the last bad recession which was under Reagan and unemployment went 10.8% and stayed over 10 for 10 months it just takes time to recovery and comparing dems have done extemely well. BTW Bush did not start exercising right to veto until after dems gained majority nothing passed repubs did not want passed
@barsense -The Dems have NOT done extremely well. They quadrupled the national debt and rammed a power grab bill called Healthcare reform down America's throats against the collective will. THIS is why they will lose both houses in NOvember. I think you need to do research. I can back up anything I say. Dems hav no answers for the problem before us. They have dragged the country to the bottom like an anchor since 07. Just imagine if they actually passed Cap & Trade. Get a hold of yourself.
@JimFromWaterford - I can agree with that argument, However the Healthcare Bill that was passed will not take care of any of that. Patriotic American's like myself are funding any Representative that will starve this illegal bill from funding so that it rightfully dies on the vine. Less government is always good. I am also for a cap on welfare and drug screening for anyone who gets government assistance. I am for a universal flat tax and a 50% reducion in the size of our government. NOVEMBER!
@JimFromWaterford Actually according to independent polls about healthcare where the questions are not formatted to favor either party seem to support that most Americans like myself were tired of paying Ins. co. ceo's 12 to 24 mil a yr. just to find new ways to rip off consumers and are glad that some consumer protections have been implemeted to force insurance co. to actually provide the services they are paid for.
@JimFromWaterford What portability would you be referring to and as far as inexperienced LOL , no pres is experienced unless they have already served a term and that is why they hire members on their teams who have served with previous presidents and hire members who have experience in all the various different fields, research history of previous presidents. and consult with previous pres. Any good pres worth his salt will do the same and act on info not on ideology alone.
@JimFromWaterford Carter's holds a better record for GDP growth than Reagan had in any year during his terms so I don't think anyone could truthfully call Carter the worst pres.
@JimFromWaterford repubs tend be far tied to ideology and then to ignore everything else including when history shows clearly that their ideology needs some adjustments. That is why I prefer dems because they are more flexible and more inclined to adjust with changing times.
@barsense - Thanks for your twisted interpretation of a party you don't align yourself with.
Explain why in 2007 Dems took both houses, in 2009 you took the White House and today it is ALL in trouble? Stop blaming the Republican's. THIS is ALL the fault of the Left. I'm tired of the ignorant "Blame Republicans for our failures" approoach, and so is America.
The Left takes a hard hit in less than 30 day! I will celebrate the Democrats EARNED loss of power.
I don't want to start a discussion, but you seriously need to learn some facts before saying things like "I will celevrate the Democrats earned loss of power." You are bought to Republicans for a long time... I don't say they are incompetent, but I say this party needs a serious rearrangement because of its defaults.
@sayenshin - I am well schooled in the relm of today's politics. Democrats have been in control of the govermnet since Jan. 2007. EVERYTHING they have done has been a disaster! The politicians ignored their constituancy and are now being attacked by the Tea Party, which the Democrats are to blame for it's existence! They crafted illegal bills, loaded with pork and backroom deals, that will all evetually be stricken. Republicans watched the Tea Party and know Americans are watching. Dems lose.
@JimFromWaterford Nope, Bush started exercising his right to veto for the first time in his two terms AFTER the dems gained the majority and nothing was passed that the republicans did not want passed. We were loosing over 1/2 million jobs a month and went as high as 757,000 in Jan. BEFORE Obama and dems could pass any all dem legislations and when they did jobs losses instantly started going down until last month private industry showed GAIN of 64,000. BTW gov decreased by 159.000.
@JimFromWaterford 122 promises kept to the letter and 39 compromises which just show he worked with the repubs to pass bi-partisan legislation like he said he was. Records easily disprove your charge so it brings into question and looks suspiciously like you are the one in the mindless sheep category.
@barsense - Look, I know you are being paid and the Dems are panicing. Rightfully so. LOL @ 122 promises kept. He lied about so many more! You would be untruthful if you were to say that Campaigning Obama is the same as President Obama. BTW, how that 2 year campaign promise to close GITMO and end the war in Iraq and bring our soliders home? For starters. Look, Obama is a complete bust,...and you know it.
@barsense - Common sense reform? Why no portability? That's a no-brainer. Can you explain that lapse of judgement for this very inexperienced President, (By his own admission)?
@JimFromWaterford Hey man I live in a repub state, used to be repub spoon-fed from birth till I started doing some research on sites that don't offer opinions or take sides. BTW, Bush did not exercise his right to veto until dems gained majority NOTHING passed repubs did not want passed. Repubs trashed the economy not dems, Dems finally get to pass something they want and economy improves. went from MINUS 6% GDP to PLUS 3.7% GDP first quarter after dems really do get control my man.
@barsense - Nope. What you wrote was pure conjecture and myth. Dems have done nothing but offer excuses of why they are failures since Jan. 2007. It can't be Republicans fault when the Dems owned the House and had 60 Senators. The only excuse is pure and simple failure to execute. So who do you blame for the handling of the illegal Obamacare bill? Ram it down American's throat, they will forget,...will we? We'll see in November when "Tax and Blame Democrats" lose power. They earned it!
@JimFromWaterford I was delighted when healthcare reform was passed, I was tired of paying ins. ceo's 12 to 24 million a year to find new ways to rip-off consumers. Had a friend hardest working fellow I knew worked days as employee, nights and weekends doing his own business, came down with cancer and his insurance company cancelled on him. by the time he could gather the money for treatment it was too late and he died, left his family devastated financially after working so hard for yrs.
Dear Barack Obama, Racism is an ongoing war especially to those of you people of colour are discriminated because they are considered black from the white population point of view in this world. Countries like for Australia treat people of colour with disrespect because they are considered black nor be treated equally whether it be sex, religion, nationality or party they are associate with nor given a job. What would you do to stop this ongoing war against black people when it comes equality?
IN CHINA WHEN A LEADER SAYS YES, NOBODY OPENS THEIR MOUTH AND SAYS NO! IN USA REPULICANS SAY NO TO EVERYTHING! WE CANT ,MOVE FORWARD AS A COUNTRY IF REPUBLICANS PLAY GAMES! WE NEED DISCIPLINE , MEANS SUCCESS! CHINESE INSTEAD OF SAYING NO THEY OPEN NEW FACTORIES AND BECOMING CAPITALISTS, BUT OUR REPUBLICANS SOON WILL WORK FOR CHINESE COMPANIES. AND WHAT AM I SUPOSED TO DO? AMERICAN PEOPLE PLZ HELP USA!
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Thank you President Obama, I am glad that insurance companies can no longer cancel on people that have paid their premiums on time if they get really sick and need it and I am glad they can no longer claim some ridiculous pre-existing condition. I know the insurance companies fought hard against this and have convinced a lot of people that it was not a good idea so that they can keep ripping them off and raking in the dough at their expense but some of us do know better.
Thank you President Obama, I would guess that some of these people have never experienced having their health insurance canceled on them when they needed it the most after paying premiums on time for many years or refused to pay because they claimed some ridiculous pre-existing condition. I am glad you have made it illegal for health insurance companies to rip-off consumers and they can not do this to people anymore.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I love how the two highest rated comments are from people who either can't spell or won't use grammar. America at it's best. Why don't you actually listen to the man, you may actually understand some of it.
WATCH THE FEATURED VIDEO ON MY CHANNEL, TO UNDERSTAND WHAT IS REALLY HAPPENING, THIS IS NOT A CONSPIRACY.
THIS IS FOR PALASTINE, RAMALAH, WEST BANK GAZA, THIS FOR A CHILD THAT IS SEARCHING FOR AN ANSWER, LISTEN CLOSE IVE GOT 6 WORDS FOR OBAMA, LONG LIVE PALASTINE LONG LIVE GAZA!
@mikejaz521 WATCH THE FEATURED VIDEO ON MY CHANNEL, TO UNDERSTAND WHAT IS REALLY HAPPENING, THIS IS NOT A CONSPIRACY.
THIS IS FOR PALASTINE, RAMALAH, WEST BANK GAZA, THIS FOR A CHILD THAT IS SEARCHING FOR AN ANSWER, LISTEN CLOSE IVE GOT 6 WORDS FOR OBAMA, LONG LIVE PALASTINE LONG LIVE GAZA!
@damoparman Hey didn't you know Obama sheep are the smart sheep that support liberty, freedom, and rights of the people. Can't say the same for the sheep on the right considering what they support.
@barsense the obama sheep support freedom and liberty and rights for the govt only---myself i support what the vast majority of the people want for our country and not what the obamas think we need or what they are willing to let us have---we dont want or need a nanny govt---this country is great cause of independance of the people and not the rule of the govt---if govt has all the power over the people and what they do and say we will not be free--big tax to protect others while we starve--NO
@damoparman But that is where you are wrong. Our Founding Fathers said a strong energetic central government to protect the people is essential to the security of liberty and prosperity for America. And they warned that banks, mega corps, that work hand in hand with the Fed.Reserve as being the biggest danger to the future of this country. It is conservatives that want to limit the power of gov to protect the people and give more power to the mega corps.
@barsense Alexander Hamilton wrote that the luxury of the rich should be considered tributary to the public treasury as much as is PRACTICABLE, so that the portion of the burden should not be to oppressive upon the masses which are poorer. The greed of man must be constrained by an energetic centrol government of the people. The only way to really have a gov that represents the people as our Founding Fathers intended is to get big money out of our election process and control the mega corp
"I see in the near future a crisis approaching that unnerves me and causes me to tremble for the safety of my country; corporations have been enthroned, an era of corruption in High Places will follow, and the Money Power of the Country will endeavor to prolong its reign by working upon the prejudices of the People, until the wealth is aggregated in a few hands, and the Republic is destroyed. I feel at this moment more anxiety for the safety of my country than ever before, even in midst of war
democrats are fighting to save this country and give the power back to the people thru an energetic government by and of the people , conservatives are fighting to give more power to Fed Reserve, banks, mega corps that work hand in hand and limit the power of the government of the people to secure liberty in America. Our Founding Fathers warned against that, without an energetic central government a country is doomed they said.
@barsense there were no mega-corp or fed reserve at the time of the founding fathers and further more the obamas are the mega-corp and own the fed reserve and know about both of there practices--they{obama} benefit from both and they will not audit the fed--and they are gonna restrict the corp. till they just go to another country and leave us high and dry---the govt needs to get out of the way of progress and stop puting politics ahead of the people--remember we pay him to get votes for his mob
@damoparman Actually there was a form of Federal reserve at the time of our Founding Fathers only it was called the central bank of the US and later was changed to the federal reserve. And there were a form of mega corps even back then in England and that the Founding Fathers were warning about developing here in America and about the dangers involved.
@barsense fed reserve came in 1913 after 3 other charter banks or temp central banks---the fed res was to set the limits of intrests and salarys and to be a safety net if the other banks failed and the country could not get loans to keep the economy going---but---the fed res has grown real long arms now and it now needs to be regulated but its a piggie bank for every pres to dip from when they have a particular agenda and that was not what it was designed to do and they need to be audited
@damoparman It is not the president that can dip into the piggy unless it suits them, the Federal reserve works hand in hand with the mega banks and mega corps and there has been a battle between the federal reserve and federal government for power ( behind the scenes) almost since conception. The federal reserve and federal government only work together when it suits the Federal Reserve.
yes asshole you did make history! you have done more damage & taken more lives in the 2 years you have been in office than any other president in history! you should be tried as a fucking traitor!!!
Obama said at 1:13 - "Then you've gotta help us finish this fight."
..And who is this "fight" against, Mr. president? Surely you don't mean you're fighting the will of the majority of the American people.... or are you?
You don't even know what you are talking about, you just know your own primate races weaknesses. You yourself are just an old Nigger that thinks he has something special to invoke upon the people. You don't...also keep reading your cue cards. However congrats on being able to read and write, for that is a rarity among your people.
1 in 5 Americans believe that President Barack Obama is a car that can talk, according to a new survey. The survey found that more than half believe the president was manufactured in either Japan or South Korea and arrived in Atlantic City on board a large freight vessel in 1993. 48% think he is a mid-price sports coupé. Among those who believe he is a talking car, more than 70% claim he uses a refined mid-Atlantic accent, while 23% insist it is a fuzzy, robotic monotone.
@SlunkyLand There is so much hate in the world because of how people are raised. People are raised bad mostly because of money issues. They grow up poor in slums and ghettos. In these environments nice guys die fast. The real evil is the monetary system. If this system was removed there would be no evil because there would be no poverty. So there would be no crime, no theft, no murders, etc etc. This is nothing more than an inevitable symptom of the monetary system nothing more.
@buckinfitches your crazy... that would make alot of our problems better but there will always be hate crime murder war ect.ect. as long as humans walk the earth we will cause are own problems belive that
@SlunkyLand God is an imaginary delusion of the human mind based on bronze age myths in a 2000 year old book of magic, written by dozens of uneducated peasants, over the course of a 100 years and they didn't even start writing until 100 years after this imaginary Jesus guy! The book was probably rewritten a good 15,000 times over the last couple millennium. Lol if you believe that shit you a gullible son of a bitch!
He dun fucked up! You would think being the first black president he would try and set the bar high. So far he's turning out to be one of the worst in history and he just started! Just wait until he starts some wars heh.
Either he is just hands down one of the worst presidents ever or the bankers that infest this administration put a gun to his head and said "do as we tell you!" probably a little of both!
Where is the change we have been brainwashed with? No change just deceit! He uses the words GOD BLESS AMERICA Anyone who believes a word he says should search Obama religion, Obama slandering the bible. Obama says America is not a Christian Nation, I dare anyone who likes this liar to look it up/ Ho you see any change for the good in america? What has this Man done? Nothing!!!!!!!!!!!!!
what a powerful man. he can say whatever he wants actually, and I'll believe him)
childofworld 2 months ago
I am a slick CON-MAN with alotta rich people behind him who have covered my illicit past- I NEVER miss an opportunity for the TV spotlight because my likeability covers my CRIMINAL past and people ignore my multiple SSN's and the FORGED birth certificate- EVERY word from my mouth is a LIE- I am the most secretive of ALL presidents- Every part of my past has been hidden or destroyed at great expense- I even surrendered my LAW license to avoid investigation- I AM THE BIGGEST FRAUD OF ALL TIME-
MrsMaryBoyle 2 months ago
Yesssssssss
AnnAAngel1564 7 months ago
Ron Paul 2012!
Fireball1013 9 months ago
According to the CATO Institute, when adjusted for inflation, non-defense, non-interest spending increased by 5.4% per year under George W. Bush. Under Clinton, it increased by 2.9% annually. Under Reagan, it increased by only 1% a year. Therefore, Reagan was a true fiscal conservative, despite the attacks by the left over his deficit spending. America needs another Reagan.
Edgehead10075 10 months ago
@Edgehead10075 IF YOU REALLY THINK THAT YOU NEED TO LOOK UP TEFRA PASSED REAGAN IN HIS SECOND YEAR THE LARGEST TAX INCREASE IN PEACETIME HISTORY TAKING BACK SOME OF HIS TOP INCOME TAX CUTS IN BACKDOOR INCREASES ON DIVIDENDS, SAVINGS. AND TAX INCREASES ON BIZ ,AND ON MIDDLE INCOME. OF COURSE YOU NEVER HEAR THE RIGHT MENTIONING TEFRA TAX INCREASES, OR THE FACT THAT UNEMPLOYMENT WENT AS HIGH AS 10.9% BEFORE the tax increase after his intial 1rst yr. big tax cuts for top income. LMAO
barsense 10 months ago
Was the high unemployment caused by his tax cuts, though, or was it a residual effect of the Carter administration?
Edgehead10075 10 months ago
@barsense Perhaps you are unaware that Paul Volker had raised interest rates to 14%, before Reagan inaugurated? I wonder, what would happen to the economy, today, if the Fed raised rates to 14%? Starting today, with 8.8% unemployment, do you think the collapse would stay at the 10.9% rate??? STUPID.
luvcheney1 9 months ago
The GOP needs a REAL CONSERVATIVE in 2012. We (the base) want spending cuts and a budget surplus. Bush failed. Obviously, Obama is failing. It's time for someone to LEAD.
Edgehead10075 10 months ago
@Edgehead10075 BTW, the deficit tripled under REAGAN SO using him as an example of conservative spending is extremely counter productive.
barsense 10 months ago
What caused the deficit was the tremendous increase in defense spending. Many conservatives have excused Reagan for that in light of the fact that we were fighting a Cold War. Some would credit this spending for winning the Cold War. As a Governor, Reagan turned deficits into surpluses, which would seem to indicate that he theoretically believed in balanced budgets.
Edgehead10075 10 months ago
@Edgehead10075 Unemployment was in the 7% range when Reagan was inaugarated. AFTER Reagan tax cuts unemployed continued to ESCALATE until by his SECOND YEAR GET IT , NOT HIS FIRST YEAR , REAGANS slowly now read HIS SECOND YEAR UNEMPLOYMENT WAS OVER 10% FOR 10 MONTHS ESCALATING UNTIL IT REACHED 10.9% IT WAS ONLY AFTER REAGAN read slowly now PASSED THE BIGGEST TAX INCREASE IN PEACETIME HISTORY TAKING BACK MUCH OF HIS INITIAL 1RST YR. TAX CUTS THAT UNEMPLOYMENT DECREASED
barsense 10 months ago
Okay, but that doesn't prove that it was the tax cuts that caused more unemployment. (Why would cutting taxes increase unemployment?) Figuring out cause and effect in economics is kind of tricky, and it takes time for tax cuts to have their effect. Also, why was unemployment high to begin with?
Edgehead10075 10 months ago
Pardon me for changing the subject, but I have an interesting question. Why do liberals generally respect Ron Paul (as evidenced during the '08 GOP primaries) yet despise Rand Paul? The two of the them are basically the same.
Edgehead10075 10 months ago
@barsense I do not know ANY progressives or democrats that are very fond of Ron Paul. there are some far left where the right meets the left and it is hard to tell the difference that favor Ron Paul but that is only because they have never studied his voting record. If they did they would not care for him anymore than I do. Ron Paul votes against average working people on EVERYTHING. Ron Paul always votes for corporations and the elite and they way he votes makes what he says LIES.
barsense 10 months ago
We made HISTORY alright, and we're still making HISTORY with this p o s president. You people just can't see it can you.
kennethrobinson11231 10 months ago
yahhhhhhh
AnnAAngel1564 11 months ago
this nigger is brain washing these idiots again
LaOm33 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
OBWANA IS A CHIMP THAT ENJOY COCAINE
OBWANA IS A CHIMP THAT ENJOY COCAINE
OBWANA IS A CHIMP THAT ENJOY COCAINE
OBWANA IS A CHIMP THAT ENJOY COCAINE
MegaCoooooool 1 year ago
yeaaaaaaaa
AnnAAngel1564 1 year ago
The people of the US must reject the tax cuts for the rich and super-rich. The income disparity is grotesque and ruinous to the ambitions and survival of the general public. The children of the US should not be paying debts caused by the current wealthy capitalist exploiters in Congress and business. "Senator Bernie Sanders Denounces Obama-GOP Tax Cut" has lots of details about the looting of the American public by the super rich: youtube . com / watch?v=krmH5IlHjz8
gregjalbert 1 year ago
he has made history.... as America's first non-citizen socialist Muslim illegal president.
timd941 1 year ago
The use of automobiles by US drivers and other gasoline-addicted people in the world constitutes a 'pollution bomb', for which the world is suffering greatly, and it will get much worse as climate disruption escalates. 'Terrorism' is a fabrication and provocation by the military-industrial-congressional complex to keep people enslaved to their criminal imperialist looting of resources and wasteful urban 'design'. Puppets of the automobile/oil/asphalt/concrete industries, free yourselves.
gregjalbert 1 year ago
@gregjalbert how is exactly terrorism keeping people enslaved to "their criminal imperialist looting"? Do you mean that people pollute and do what they do, because they are afraid of terrorists?
Loves2EatYourPeach 1 year ago
Repeal obamacare!!!
bishopm5 1 year ago
@bishopm5 NO Thanks on repealing, I would rather not go back to paying ceo's of insurance corporations 12 to 24 million a year just to find new ways to keep from paying for the healthcare that my premiums are supposed to cover.
barsense 1 year ago
The Supreme Court is going to repeal it; get over it. CEO's are going to make millions, even with Obamacare.
Edgehead10075 11 months ago
@Edgehead10075 The supreme court really does not have a leg to stand on to repeal it, GET OVER IT .in the healthcare reform bill it clearly states that any state that can do it better and cheaper CAN DO IT THEIR WAY.
barsense 11 months ago
One judge has already struck it down. The mandate is unconstitutional. There's also no interstate commerce affected since you can't buy health insurance across state lines.
Edgehead10075 11 months ago
@Edgehead10075 It is 2 for 2 right now and the Florida judge did not follow precedent so that makes his judgement highly questionable and rather easy to defeat. He threw the whole bill out and certainly not all of it could even be remotely questioned and that is not judicial procedure. Procedure requires keeping as much of any bill as possible. And we have all kinds of mandates some state, some local, etc etc. and certainly fed can mandate if state and local can.
barsense 11 months ago
The law doesn't have a clause in it allowing the other parts of the bill to remain law if one part is struck down. If one part is struck down, the entire law is struck down. Also, the Supreme Court is majority conservative.
The mandate is unconstitutional because simply existing (the reason for being forced to buy private health insurance plans) doesn't affect interstate commerce. States have more freedom under their constitutions.
Edgehead10075 11 months ago
There are many things troubling about Obamacare. Another thing is that it requires certain businesses to cover healthcare for their employees or pay a penalty. Healthcare really shouldn't be tied to private employers (unless they want to cover their employees), and it passes the costs onto consumers.
Edgehead10075 11 months ago
@Edgehead10075 As a small business owner I am hoping the reform will pass as is. the exchanges in 2014 will for the first time offer discounted insurance rates for small biz like large biz has always gotten. This along with the new healthcare tax credits will allow many small biz to be able to offer health insurance to employees and at less expensive share costs at that. The penalties only apply to employers with over 50 employees and most already offer ins. anyway.
barsense 10 months ago
The free market should take care of discounted insurance rates.
Nobody is against the tax credits.
Edgehead10075 10 months ago
@Edgehead10075 Yeah free market has been doing great so far hasn't it. LMAO. No clause needed standard procedure you need to look it up yourself.
barsense 10 months ago
1. It needs a severability clause. Read "Obamacare: D.O.A." on dick morris dot com. It's dated February 1.
2. We don't even have a free market. You can't even cross state lines to buy health insurance. Insurance companies shouldn't be forced by law to give discounts.
Edgehead10075 10 months ago
Negotiate for discounts.
Edgehead10075 10 months ago
@Edgehead10075 LMAO, great plan haha, as if insurance companies really will negotiate with small biz . hahahahhahahahahhahahahahhahahahhahahahahhahahhahahhahhahahahhahahahhahahahahhahahahhaha
barsense 10 months ago
That shouldn't be my problem or the government's. Then don't offer healthcare if you can't afford it. Health insurance would probably cost less anyway if we lifted regulations.
Edgehead10075 10 months ago
@barsense I have an individual policy, I`m 59, its for my wife and I together, and it costs $300 mo. I also am at a 150% rate, because of preexisting conditions. It just paid off $140,000 for my back surgery. You are so full of shit.hahahahhahahahahhahahahahhahahahhahahahahhahahhahahhahhahahahhahahahhahahahahhahahahhahahahahahhahahahahhahahahahhahahhahahahhahahahahhahahahahhahahahhahahahahhahahhahahhahhahahahhahahahhahahahahhahahahhahahahahahahhahahahhaha. Asshole.
luvcheney1 10 months ago
@luvcheney1 Hey clueless if more and more people continue to add to the list of uninsured then your prices are going to keep going up until you become one of the uninsured. . Wake up stupid. The more people that have insurance the cheaper insurance is for everyone , young and healthy and old and pre-exisiting. Get a goddam clue or shutup because your ignorance is apalling.
barsense 10 months ago
@barsense More people on insurance does NOT necessarily mean lower prices for the insurance. It depends on the health risks of those added. Young, and healthy people are not as likely to voluntarily purchase insurance, and their presence in the "pool" would reduce costs, because THEY would get SCREWED in the deal ( paying in more than getting in help). You cant pile in a bunch of SICK, pre-existing, old, people in NEED of help, and lower costs, you must RAPE financially the young and healthy.
luvcheney1 10 months ago
@luvcheney1 You still do not have a clue and your arguments are falacious BS. Idiot fool insurance companies will offer lower premiums to young and heatlhy to compete to get more of them in their insurance pools regardless of whether there are mandates or not and getting more insured lowers the costs for everyone and stupid ignoramous if this is not done it will get to the point where idiot ignorant fools like you can not afford insurance either and prices will be higher for young anyway
barsense 10 months ago
@barsense Please explain how adding more people into the pool lowers the costs for everyone, UNLESS those new people are going to be charged in EXCESS of their own medical RISKS, therefore paying more than they should to pay for others. Insurance "pools" are rated as to the chances of costs to the insurer, and then operating costs are added. Each age group has its own price. So, each "pool" insures itself, according to risk. More people CAN lower costs ONLY IF they are overcharged.
luvcheney1 10 months ago
@luvcheney1 If you can not understand the concept that insurance was developed on in the very beginning with the very first insurance company ever started in this country of getting as many people as possible in a pool paying premiums so that there would be money on hand for those who were unfortunate enough to suffer a tragedy and need to file a claim then I can NOT explain it to you.
barsense 10 months ago
@barsense You have to charge enough of the "pool" to pay all claims, plus the administration of it. Now, you have said that adding MORE workers would reduce THAT cost. It could all right, but ONLY if the newly insured were charged MORE than their likely costs, plus Admin! My insurance co has doubled deductibles ($7000 to 12000) AND after deductible, pay now 70% instead of 100%! Thanks Obama! Preexisting conditions, no limits, kids till 26, cost money, STUPID.
luvcheney1 10 months ago
You shouldn't even have to offer your employees health insurance if you don't want to. Health insurance shouldn't be tied to places of employment. Liberals whine about HMO's, but the Democrats were the ones who created them.
Obamacare is unconstitutional, and it does nothing about the cost of healthcare. America needs to start over (with a new President).
Edgehead10075 10 months ago
@Edgehead10075 MSM behind reform now that is the biggest joke of the YEAR if you really believe that you are very very uninformed about what is actually in the healthcare reform bill because msm has not reported the FACTS AT ALL. they have reported conservative lies mostly. BET YOU don't even know that when the healthcare exchanges kick in small biz will for the first time be able to purchase at discounted rates like large biz has always gotten and that will decrease employee costs ???
barsense 10 months ago
@Edgehead10075 BTW, all biz with less than 50 employees is exempt from the healthcare reform changes it does not effect them and if you know of any corp with more than 50 employees that does not already offer heatlh insurance I would be very surprised. I don't know of any myself. Reform just gives lower profit margin small biz with the new healthcare tax credits and exchanges the ability to purchase for employees and costs will be cheaper for employees.
barsense 10 months ago
@Edgehead10075 Obviously you are misinformed. standard procedure is to only strike down parts of a bill and pass as much as is possible. Anyway we wll see how it goes in the supreme courts final decision which will be up to them to decide whether it is constitutional or not. some will say yes others will say no and it depends on the majority whihc is conservative so there is a possibility parts will be considered unconstitutional.
barsense 10 months ago
There has to be a clause placed in the bill to let parts of it stand.
Edgehead10075 10 months ago
@barsense Why? Are you nuts? There is NO severability clause in it, and even if there were, Obamacare would be DEAD if forcing people to buy a service is unConstitutional. It will be bankrupt, if people are not made to buy.
luvcheney1 10 months ago
@luvcheney1 On you on here also with your false stories. Boy you do get around with your BS don't you. LMAO
barsense 10 months ago
@luvcheney1 You need to read the bill before you go spouting off about severability clause uninformed mislead and confused person that you are it might not help though because you probably don't have the cognitive abiltiy to decipher and discriminate crucial differences anyway. .
barsense 10 months ago
@barsense From the "Washington Post", “there was no ’severability’ clause written into this law, which shows how amateurish the process was,” he wrote. “Virtually every bill I’ve ever read includes a provision that if any part of the law is ruled unconstitutional the rest of the law will remain intact. Not this one. That will likely mean that the entire law will be thrown out if a part of it is found to violate the Constitution.”
luvcheney1 10 months ago
@barsense From ABC News, Feb 3, 2011, "“First, the Act does not contain a ‘severability clause,’ which is commonly included in legislation,” Vinson wrote. “The lack of a severability clause in this case is significant because one had been included in an earlier version of the Act, but it was removed in the bill that subsequently became law". Hey STUPID, cant you Google??
luvcheney1 10 months ago
@luvcheney1 Yes idiot I can google but I don't google msm which rarely is dependable , I google the actual legislation and read it , if you tried that once in awhile yourself you would not always be QUITE SUCH AN IDIOT.
barsense 10 months ago
@barsense Are yousaying you know their IS a severability clause in the Legislation, because you read it? Fine! I will wait for you to cite your source, and help me read it? I want to be smart, like you. Because when I Google the subject, I find mountains of sources stating there is none. Of course, the lawsuits over Obamacare hinge on this issue, YOU are the expert. Help me over this please.
luvcheney1 10 months ago
There is no severability clause. I'm 100% positive of this.
Edgehead10075 10 months ago
@luvcheney1 Go to govtrack.us download the PDF or go to Thomas Library and read the bill yourself and get someone to help you understand it. I would not even attempt to help you anyone who does not even understand the very most basic concept that insurance was developed upon needs specialized assistance that I am not qualified for.
barsense 10 months ago
@barsense I need you to refer me to the severability clause in the legislation, since you already know its there, read and understood the 2400 pages of it. OR, I would find a reference to a recent article refering to the clause, perhaps quoting it. Perhaps you may recall telling me the Saudi Prince owned "supervoting" shares? I can look all day, and not find it, because it wasnt true, nor would you back up your insistence to it. Redeem yourself, refer me to the clause.
luvcheney1 10 months ago
I have an interesting question for you before I answer some of your responses. (I have tons of responses from people, so I'm backed up.) Since domestic spending under Bush grew at an incredible rate (5.4%/yr. adjusted for inflation), why don't I ever hear liberals giving him credit for being, well, a LIBERAL? Sure, liberals hated him for the war and his views on social issues, but, fiscally speaking, he was a liberal. Liberals are for increasing government, and that's what Bush did.
Edgehead10075 10 months ago
@Edgehead10075 Just about every cost saving measure ever introduced by any economist right and left that was given high grades for chance of working to cut costs was included in the healthcare reform bill. What we need in America is better informed voters who don't fall for the sheepstink pushed by msm with the massive conservative monopoly that they have purchased in order to convince people to cut their own throats and by your remarks you do sound like one of the Baaaa baaaa's .
barsense 10 months ago
What about allowing people to purchase health insurance across state lines? What about tort reform?
The MSM is 100% behind Obamacare.
I'm sure that most Americans support helping people who can't afford health insurance, but many who already have health insurance are worried how this will affect them.
I support the idea of covering those without healthcare, but I think that we should start over. If Obamacare is struck down by the courts, we will have to start over.
Edgehead10075 10 months ago
@Edgehead10075 LOL> msm has reported only what conservatives have wanted reported. ONE CBO said tort reform would have little effect on cost because most states already HAVE TORT REFORM. DUH competition in my repub state we can purchase from over 25 different nationwide ins. co. the cheapest policies with 10K deduct are still 300 month for private ins. INS. is cheaper in dem states & better quality, CBO said competition would decrease quality raise costs on older and sicker
barsense 10 months ago
@Edgehead10075 LOL> msm has reported only what conservatives have wanted reported. ONE CBO said tort reform would have little effect on cost because most states already HAVE TORT REFORM. competition in my repub state we can purchase from dozens different nationwide ins. co. the cheapest policies with 10K deduct are still 300 month for private ins. INS. is cheaper in dem states & better quality, CBO said competition would decrease quality raise costs on older and sicker and it HAS
barsense 10 months ago
@Edgehead10075 That shows extreme misinformed, uninformed, misled, and rather extreme and grossly inaccurate bias to say that liberals are for more government. liberals are for BETTER government which can mean more government in some cases and less government in some cases. And you should do some checking on history and statisics, REPUBLICANS have created the most government jobs and democrats have created the most private industry jobs since 1945.
barsense 10 months ago
Okay, but I wonder in what departments those jobs are in and why. Also, I don't give that much credit to politicians for private sector jobs created.
Edgehead10075 10 months ago
Yeah more control alright.. More control for him.
dmbfan07cb 1 year ago
History was certainly made on Nov 2nd. More house seats lost since Truman was president.
Great Job Obama! You are killing your party from within. Keep up the good work. The GOP thanks you.
OhNoYouCant 1 year ago
"YES WE COULD"......
HOMEnHIGH 1 year ago
GO OBAMA
rjohnston96 1 year ago
We deny six-year-olds the right to carry guns. We deny rights to people who don't have the mental capacity to understand responsibilities that go with those rights. A six-year-old is not smart enough to be able to exercise the right to own a gun responsibly. What does Barack think of your mental capacity to maintain your health responsibly? Review usdebtclock()org and reconsider whether the Federal Government should be the judge when it comes to responsibility.
luvmedo56 1 year ago
@luvmedo56 LOL, Only thing Obama is trying to do is make it possible for more Americans to have healthcare and pay for the increases in medicare part D prescriptions that republicans passed. If you can't afford healthcare you will not be mandated, if you don't want heatlhcare insurance, fine file the paperwork to show you can pay for your own medical expenses if something happens instead of everyone else having to pay for it and you will be exempt from mandates.
barsense 1 year ago
Comment removed
HellesBringer 1 year ago
The sooner Obama, Michele, and all their dual-citizen Zionist staff and czars are gone, the better! May God hurry them along, and may they take McCain with them. And PLEASE also take with you Pelosi, Reid, Barney, Feinstein, Boxer, Snowe, Collins, and all the other long-timers. We need ONLY new blood in Congress.
GThomason 1 year ago
Another thing, you keep parroting wrong unemployment numbers under Reagan. Reagan never saw over 10%, EVER. The highest was in 1982 @ 9.7% and 9.6% in 1983, but he averaged 7.5% throughout his Presidency. By the way, Reagan inherited a recession from Carter, but you didn't hear Reagan whine about what he "inherited", Reagan simply fixed it without excuses and with class, (Reagan is the polar opposite of Obama!)
Stop being a typical liberal, spreading lies and inaccurate information.
JimFromWaterford 1 year ago
@JimFromWaterford Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual
1981 7.5 7.4 7.4 7.2 7.5 7.5 7.2 7.4 7.6 7.9 8.3 8.5
1982 8.6 8.9 9.0 9.3 9.4 9.6 9.8 9.8 10.1 10.4 10.8 10.8
1983 10.4 10.4 10.3 10.2 10.1 10.1 9.4 9.5 9.2 8.8 8.5 8.3 Where did you get your info Wikipedia, lol. this came straight from the BLS website so don't call me a liar. I can back it up I will be back with a link and you can look at it yourself.
barsense 1 year ago
@JimFromWaterford The darn link will not post on here I will see if it will post on your channel then you can see for yourself that I am NOT parroting the wrong unemployment numbers under Reagan I AM PARROTING THE CORRECT unemployment number under Reagan.
barsense 1 year ago
@JimFromWaterford The link is posted on your channel look at the numbers yourself. the numbers I posted came straight from the BLS website and that is the site where other sites get their numbers from if they publish accurate numbers. This is always the original source. Bureau of Labor Statistics.
barsense 1 year ago
HEHEHEHEHEHEHE WE JEWS WILL SUCK YOUR BLOOD HEHEHEHHEHEHE
wejewsdid911HAHAHA89 1 year ago
RON PAUL 2012
Stop looking left or right, and look for the truth.
AUDIT THE FED.
RON PAUL 2012
jman202011 1 year ago
Sheep.
JimFromWaterford 1 year ago
@JimFromWaterford I am not wrong or insane, try looking up the stats and numbers on sites that only offers numbers, stats, that do not give opinion or take sides. I can give you some references to some good sites if you are really interested in truth and don't want to continue to be misled.
barsense 1 year ago
@barsense - I guess the whole country was misled during the Carter years. I remember gas lines and severe recession. Kind of like what we have under BHO. I understand your position though, you have to find some good news somewhere. It is your job!
JimFromWaterford 1 year ago
@JimFromWaterford Carter did start during a period of severe stagflation and the Great Oil Embargo, so it was not great for people. Plus he did some things that repubs are currently running on, cut gov.wages and cut unemployment rates trying to control deficit did not make him popular cause in reaction private industry cut wages also. BTW , the only reward I get is if dems stay in control cause I get to live in a country that is not ran by foreign owned mega corps.
barsense 1 year ago
@barsense Like GE? Didn't Obama give GE 24.9 MILLION dollars in Stimulus money? Didn't GE send over 18.000 jobs overseas in the same year that they had 156 BILLION in revenue? Ooooh, you're talking about the unsubstantiated claim about the Chamber of Commerce. That's pretty reckless if you are. I think the Repubs should claim Axelrod is a child molester and let him prove that he is not. That's exactly the tactic Obama and Axelrod and mindless puppets like Olberdork & Mr. Maddow are using.
JimFromWaterford 1 year ago
@JimFromWaterford Look we gave repub policies 8 yrs. and they did NOT work simple as that. The only income level to do well was the top income, wallstreet took too many risks, etc. economy tanked. I want protectionism for American industries, I want a gov that reps for all income levels not just top income, we are a consumer based economy and the better the masses do the more consumer purchasing power, I think the dems are a better shot for what I think this country needs simple as that.
barsense 1 year ago 8
@barsense _ those are all noble, but the current batch of Dems will give you none of that. There's a reason the whole Dem party will get its ass kicked on election day!
JimFromWaterford 1 year ago
@JimFromWaterford We have a much better shot with democrats than we do with republicans and the democrats have done better with this recession which is much more severe than the recession under Reagan where unemployment went to 10.8 % and stayed at 10% for over 10 month. I do have to admit though that the strategy of the right to smear and attack with anything they could make up out of thin air that started before Obama was even inaugated has been effective unfortunately.
barsense 1 year ago 3
@barsense - The right is "smearing" the left using only the abysmal record the left has recorded. Is it really a "smear" if it is true? Do you really believe that American's are so dumb and blind that they cannot discern failure for themselves? Do you honestly believe that American's are so weak willed that they need someone to tell them how to vote and who to vote for? It's that exact attitude that gave birth to the Tea Party. The left is responsible for its OWN FAILURES and elitist attitude.
JimFromWaterford 1 year ago
Protectionism is stupid, and the economy had nothing to do with the GOP fiscal philosophy.
Edgehead10075 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@barsense Todays headlines
Obama Blames Oil Companies For Lack Of Drilling... Obama blames who?
'FACTS DON'T SUPPORT' ADMIN'S CLAIMS ON DRILLING... no sh*t
Bill Clinton calls drilling delays 'ridiculous'... Bill opposing Obama (again)!
Obama: 'It Would be so Much Easier to be President of China'... all good communist should stick together because he is a failure as President of the United States.
dkkght46 10 months ago
@barsense Obama understates deficits by $2.3 trillion... whoops just a litle mistake.
dkkght46 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
From Harding In 1921 to Bush in 2003, Democrats held the White House for 40 years, and Republicans for 42.5 years. During this time Dem created 75,820,000 net new jobs and Repub 36,440,000.Per Year Average : Dem = 1,825,200 new jobs vs. Repub = 856,400 new jobs There was either a depression or recession during the administrations of 6 of the 9 Repub presidents The DOW grew by 52% more under Dems, and GDP grew by 26.4% more under Dems
barsense 1 year ago 3
Everything he said was a lie,...everything! The mindless sheep are clapping...
JimFromWaterford 1 year ago
@JimFromWaterford The mindless sheep I have seen have mostly been on the right just constantly repeating false rhetoric and using key manipulation brainwashing words like socialism etc. without ever being able to even explain what it means to them. They certainly can not give any really valid defense for their stance without using fabrication. And most of what they claim is better for this country has already been proven that it DID NOT WORK and was worse for this country.
barsense 1 year ago 3
@barsense - OK, that is your twisted slant on America, but answer this. Since the government has been controlled by Democrats since Jan. 2007, (House & Senate, who make and pass all laws), and dominated by Democrats since Jan. 2009, what has improved?
ANSWER: NOTHING! As a matter of fact, everything is worse. The House & Senate have record low ratings, Democrats are hated throughout the country and Obama's approval falls daily. So before you pick on the right, you better look in the mirror.
JimFromWaterford 1 year ago
@JimFromWaterford No twisted slant about it. You just need to do some research and compare unemployment of this recessession with the last bad recession which was under Reagan and unemployment went 10.8% and stayed over 10 for 10 months it just takes time to recovery and comparing dems have done extemely well. BTW Bush did not start exercising right to veto until after dems gained majority nothing passed repubs did not want passed
barsense 1 year ago
@barsense -The Dems have NOT done extremely well. They quadrupled the national debt and rammed a power grab bill called Healthcare reform down America's throats against the collective will. THIS is why they will lose both houses in NOvember. I think you need to do research. I can back up anything I say. Dems hav no answers for the problem before us. They have dragged the country to the bottom like an anchor since 07. Just imagine if they actually passed Cap & Trade. Get a hold of yourself.
JimFromWaterford 1 year ago
@JimFromWaterford - I can agree with that argument, However the Healthcare Bill that was passed will not take care of any of that. Patriotic American's like myself are funding any Representative that will starve this illegal bill from funding so that it rightfully dies on the vine. Less government is always good. I am also for a cap on welfare and drug screening for anyone who gets government assistance. I am for a universal flat tax and a 50% reducion in the size of our government. NOVEMBER!
JimFromWaterford 1 year ago
@barsense -Campaigning Obama and President Obama are two very different and opposite people.
JimFromWaterford 1 year ago
Comment removed
barsense 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@JimFromWaterford Actually according to independent polls about healthcare where the questions are not formatted to favor either party seem to support that most Americans like myself were tired of paying Ins. co. ceo's 12 to 24 mil a yr. just to find new ways to rip off consumers and are glad that some consumer protections have been implemeted to force insurance co. to actually provide the services they are paid for.
barsense 1 year ago
@JimFromWaterford What portability would you be referring to and as far as inexperienced LOL , no pres is experienced unless they have already served a term and that is why they hire members on their teams who have served with previous presidents and hire members who have experience in all the various different fields, research history of previous presidents. and consult with previous pres. Any good pres worth his salt will do the same and act on info not on ideology alone.
barsense 1 year ago
@barsense - Obama is inexperienced in American politics. This cannot be denied.
JimFromWaterford 1 year ago
and that's probably why he's one of the best presidents ever...
sayenshin 1 year ago 2
@sayenshin Replace "best" with "all-time worst President". To beat Jimmy Carter is not easy to do!
JimFromWaterford 1 year ago
@JimFromWaterford Carter's holds a better record for GDP growth than Reagan had in any year during his terms so I don't think anyone could truthfully call Carter the worst pres.
barsense 1 year ago
@barsense - you are wrong and insane.
JimFromWaterford 1 year ago
@JimFromWaterford repubs tend be far tied to ideology and then to ignore everything else including when history shows clearly that their ideology needs some adjustments. That is why I prefer dems because they are more flexible and more inclined to adjust with changing times.
barsense 1 year ago 3
@barsense - Thanks for your twisted interpretation of a party you don't align yourself with.
Explain why in 2007 Dems took both houses, in 2009 you took the White House and today it is ALL in trouble? Stop blaming the Republican's. THIS is ALL the fault of the Left. I'm tired of the ignorant "Blame Republicans for our failures" approoach, and so is America.
The Left takes a hard hit in less than 30 day! I will celebrate the Democrats EARNED loss of power.
JimFromWaterford 1 year ago
I don't want to start a discussion, but you seriously need to learn some facts before saying things like "I will celevrate the Democrats earned loss of power." You are bought to Republicans for a long time... I don't say they are incompetent, but I say this party needs a serious rearrangement because of its defaults.
sayenshin 1 year ago
@sayenshin - I am well schooled in the relm of today's politics. Democrats have been in control of the govermnet since Jan. 2007. EVERYTHING they have done has been a disaster! The politicians ignored their constituancy and are now being attacked by the Tea Party, which the Democrats are to blame for it's existence! They crafted illegal bills, loaded with pork and backroom deals, that will all evetually be stricken. Republicans watched the Tea Party and know Americans are watching. Dems lose.
JimFromWaterford 1 year ago
@JimFromWaterford Nope, Bush started exercising his right to veto for the first time in his two terms AFTER the dems gained the majority and nothing was passed that the republicans did not want passed. We were loosing over 1/2 million jobs a month and went as high as 757,000 in Jan. BEFORE Obama and dems could pass any all dem legislations and when they did jobs losses instantly started going down until last month private industry showed GAIN of 64,000. BTW gov decreased by 159.000.
barsense 1 year ago
@JimFromWaterford 122 promises kept to the letter and 39 compromises which just show he worked with the repubs to pass bi-partisan legislation like he said he was. Records easily disprove your charge so it brings into question and looks suspiciously like you are the one in the mindless sheep category.
barsense 1 year ago
@barsense - Look, I know you are being paid and the Dems are panicing. Rightfully so. LOL @ 122 promises kept. He lied about so many more! You would be untruthful if you were to say that Campaigning Obama is the same as President Obama. BTW, how that 2 year campaign promise to close GITMO and end the war in Iraq and bring our soliders home? For starters. Look, Obama is a complete bust,...and you know it.
JimFromWaterford 1 year ago
@barsense - Common sense reform? Why no portability? That's a no-brainer. Can you explain that lapse of judgement for this very inexperienced President, (By his own admission)?
JimFromWaterford 1 year ago
@JimFromWaterford Hey man I live in a repub state, used to be repub spoon-fed from birth till I started doing some research on sites that don't offer opinions or take sides. BTW, Bush did not exercise his right to veto until dems gained majority NOTHING passed repubs did not want passed. Repubs trashed the economy not dems, Dems finally get to pass something they want and economy improves. went from MINUS 6% GDP to PLUS 3.7% GDP first quarter after dems really do get control my man.
barsense 1 year ago 9
@barsense - Nope. What you wrote was pure conjecture and myth. Dems have done nothing but offer excuses of why they are failures since Jan. 2007. It can't be Republicans fault when the Dems owned the House and had 60 Senators. The only excuse is pure and simple failure to execute. So who do you blame for the handling of the illegal Obamacare bill? Ram it down American's throat, they will forget,...will we? We'll see in November when "Tax and Blame Democrats" lose power. They earned it!
JimFromWaterford 1 year ago
@JimFromWaterford I was delighted when healthcare reform was passed, I was tired of paying ins. ceo's 12 to 24 million a year to find new ways to rip-off consumers. Had a friend hardest working fellow I knew worked days as employee, nights and weekends doing his own business, came down with cancer and his insurance company cancelled on him. by the time he could gather the money for treatment it was too late and he died, left his family devastated financially after working so hard for yrs.
barsense 1 year ago
Wrong. The fed is the reason why the economy is in shambles.
Obozo = one term and done, thankfully. BTW, he stole his campaign slogan from Bob the Builder. (Yes we can!)
Edgehead10075 11 months ago
Dear Barack Obama, Racism is an ongoing war especially to those of you people of colour are discriminated because they are considered black from the white population point of view in this world. Countries like for Australia treat people of colour with disrespect because they are considered black nor be treated equally whether it be sex, religion, nationality or party they are associate with nor given a job. What would you do to stop this ongoing war against black people when it comes equality?
thephantom063 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
IN CHINA WHEN A LEADER SAYS YES, NOBODY OPENS THEIR MOUTH AND SAYS NO! IN USA REPULICANS SAY NO TO EVERYTHING! WE CANT ,MOVE FORWARD AS A COUNTRY IF REPUBLICANS PLAY GAMES! WE NEED DISCIPLINE , MEANS SUCCESS! CHINESE INSTEAD OF SAYING NO THEY OPEN NEW FACTORIES AND BECOMING CAPITALISTS, BUT OUR REPUBLICANS SOON WILL WORK FOR CHINESE COMPANIES. AND WHAT AM I SUPOSED TO DO? AMERICAN PEOPLE PLZ HELP USA!
democratsaresmart 1 year ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Thank you President Obama, I am glad that insurance companies can no longer cancel on people that have paid their premiums on time if they get really sick and need it and I am glad they can no longer claim some ridiculous pre-existing condition. I know the insurance companies fought hard against this and have convinced a lot of people that it was not a good idea so that they can keep ripping them off and raking in the dough at their expense but some of us do know better.
barsense 1 year ago
Thank you President Obama, I would guess that some of these people have never experienced having their health insurance canceled on them when they needed it the most after paying premiums on time for many years or refused to pay because they claimed some ridiculous pre-existing condition. I am glad you have made it illegal for health insurance companies to rip-off consumers and they can not do this to people anymore.
barsense 1 year ago
Comment removed
barsense 1 year ago
Yah you're gonna make history.....you'll go down in history as the worst president in American history!
Robertjcksn40 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I love how the two highest rated comments are from people who either can't spell or won't use grammar. America at it's best. Why don't you actually listen to the man, you may actually understand some of it.
Michaelad567 1 year ago
WATCH THE FEATURED VIDEO ON MY CHANNEL, TO UNDERSTAND WHAT IS REALLY HAPPENING, THIS IS NOT A CONSPIRACY.
THIS IS FOR PALASTINE, RAMALAH, WEST BANK GAZA, THIS FOR A CHILD THAT IS SEARCHING FOR AN ANSWER, LISTEN CLOSE IVE GOT 6 WORDS FOR OBAMA, LONG LIVE PALASTINE LONG LIVE GAZA!
Killuminarcy 1 year ago
barack obama is the best and honest president in the world
mikejaz521 1 year ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
@mikejaz521 WATCH THE FEATURED VIDEO ON MY CHANNEL, TO UNDERSTAND WHAT IS REALLY HAPPENING, THIS IS NOT A CONSPIRACY.
THIS IS FOR PALASTINE, RAMALAH, WEST BANK GAZA, THIS FOR A CHILD THAT IS SEARCHING FOR AN ANSWER, LISTEN CLOSE IVE GOT 6 WORDS FOR OBAMA, LONG LIVE PALASTINE LONG LIVE GAZA!
Killuminarcy 1 year ago
@mikejaz521 you my friend are obama sheep and not to smart
damoparman 1 year ago
@damoparman Hey didn't you know Obama sheep are the smart sheep that support liberty, freedom, and rights of the people. Can't say the same for the sheep on the right considering what they support.
barsense 1 year ago
@barsense the obama sheep support freedom and liberty and rights for the govt only---myself i support what the vast majority of the people want for our country and not what the obamas think we need or what they are willing to let us have---we dont want or need a nanny govt---this country is great cause of independance of the people and not the rule of the govt---if govt has all the power over the people and what they do and say we will not be free--big tax to protect others while we starve--NO
damoparman 1 year ago
@damoparman But that is where you are wrong. Our Founding Fathers said a strong energetic central government to protect the people is essential to the security of liberty and prosperity for America. And they warned that banks, mega corps, that work hand in hand with the Fed.Reserve as being the biggest danger to the future of this country. It is conservatives that want to limit the power of gov to protect the people and give more power to the mega corps.
barsense 1 year ago 2
Comment removed
barsense 1 year ago
@barsense Alexander Hamilton wrote that the luxury of the rich should be considered tributary to the public treasury as much as is PRACTICABLE, so that the portion of the burden should not be to oppressive upon the masses which are poorer. The greed of man must be constrained by an energetic centrol government of the people. The only way to really have a gov that represents the people as our Founding Fathers intended is to get big money out of our election process and control the mega corp
barsense 1 year ago 2
"I see in the near future a crisis approaching that unnerves me and causes me to tremble for the safety of my country; corporations have been enthroned, an era of corruption in High Places will follow, and the Money Power of the Country will endeavor to prolong its reign by working upon the prejudices of the People, until the wealth is aggregated in a few hands, and the Republic is destroyed. I feel at this moment more anxiety for the safety of my country than ever before, even in midst of war
barsense 1 year ago
democrats are fighting to save this country and give the power back to the people thru an energetic government by and of the people , conservatives are fighting to give more power to Fed Reserve, banks, mega corps that work hand in hand and limit the power of the government of the people to secure liberty in America. Our Founding Fathers warned against that, without an energetic central government a country is doomed they said.
barsense 1 year ago
@barsense there were no mega-corp or fed reserve at the time of the founding fathers and further more the obamas are the mega-corp and own the fed reserve and know about both of there practices--they{obama} benefit from both and they will not audit the fed--and they are gonna restrict the corp. till they just go to another country and leave us high and dry---the govt needs to get out of the way of progress and stop puting politics ahead of the people--remember we pay him to get votes for his mob
damoparman 1 year ago
@damoparman Actually there was a form of Federal reserve at the time of our Founding Fathers only it was called the central bank of the US and later was changed to the federal reserve. And there were a form of mega corps even back then in England and that the Founding Fathers were warning about developing here in America and about the dangers involved.
barsense 1 year ago
@barsense fed reserve came in 1913 after 3 other charter banks or temp central banks---the fed res was to set the limits of intrests and salarys and to be a safety net if the other banks failed and the country could not get loans to keep the economy going---but---the fed res has grown real long arms now and it now needs to be regulated but its a piggie bank for every pres to dip from when they have a particular agenda and that was not what it was designed to do and they need to be audited
damoparman 1 year ago
@damoparman It is not the president that can dip into the piggy unless it suits them, the Federal reserve works hand in hand with the mega banks and mega corps and there has been a battle between the federal reserve and federal government for power ( behind the scenes) almost since conception. The federal reserve and federal government only work together when it suits the Federal Reserve.
barsense 1 year ago
greetings from GERMANY!!!! LOVE! LOVE! LOVE !!:))
TheTanzmaus08 1 year ago
"We are going to make history as the worst government of all time"
12fig 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
WHERE IS OUR CHANGE? YOU WILL BE EXPOSED
landmark425 1 year ago
same kidna speach hitler made. lol
mavenGamer 1 year ago
yes asshole you did make history! you have done more damage & taken more lives in the 2 years you have been in office than any other president in history! you should be tried as a fucking traitor!!!
FIREALANSIMPSON 1 year ago
Obama said at 1:13 - "Then you've gotta help us finish this fight."
..And who is this "fight" against, Mr. president? Surely you don't mean you're fighting the will of the majority of the American people.... or are you?
qpwillie 1 year ago
You don't even know what you are talking about, you just know your own primate races weaknesses. You yourself are just an old Nigger that thinks he has something special to invoke upon the people. You don't...also keep reading your cue cards. However congrats on being able to read and write, for that is a rarity among your people.
InfantIncinerator84 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Free israel
mafiaboy191 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
FUCK BARACK OSAMA!!!!!
Killbr33d100 1 year ago
NEW SONG ABOUT OBAMA MAMA
CHECK IT OUT...1 OF A KIND OBAMA...PLZ LEAVE A COMMENT
1nuniebaby 1 year ago
der GUTE MENSCH muhammad yunus hat mit seinen engagment
( micro credite ) 6,6 millionen menschen aus der armut geholfen
könnte jemand mal unsere politiker auf diesen tollen menschen
( muhammad yunus )aufmerksam machen ,damit unsere regierungen mal lernen
wie man entwicklungshilfe macht und armut bekaemft.
gruß michael stenzel.
michaelstenzel 1 year ago
1 in 5 Americans believe that President Barack Obama is a car that can talk, according to a new survey. The survey found that more than half believe the president was manufactured in either Japan or South Korea and arrived in Atlantic City on board a large freight vessel in 1993. 48% think he is a mid-price sports coupé. Among those who believe he is a talking car, more than 70% claim he uses a refined mid-Atlantic accent, while 23% insist it is a fuzzy, robotic monotone.
billydeeuk 1 year ago
Obama is the best!
rippen100 1 year ago
@SlunkyLand There is so much hate in the world because of how people are raised. People are raised bad mostly because of money issues. They grow up poor in slums and ghettos. In these environments nice guys die fast. The real evil is the monetary system. If this system was removed there would be no evil because there would be no poverty. So there would be no crime, no theft, no murders, etc etc. This is nothing more than an inevitable symptom of the monetary system nothing more.
buckinfitches 1 year ago
@buckinfitches your crazy... that would make alot of our problems better but there will always be hate crime murder war ect.ect. as long as humans walk the earth we will cause are own problems belive that
stonerst3ve 1 year ago
@SlunkyLand God is an imaginary delusion of the human mind based on bronze age myths in a 2000 year old book of magic, written by dozens of uneducated peasants, over the course of a 100 years and they didn't even start writing until 100 years after this imaginary Jesus guy! The book was probably rewritten a good 15,000 times over the last couple millennium. Lol if you believe that shit you a gullible son of a bitch!
buckinfitches 1 year ago
He dun fucked up! You would think being the first black president he would try and set the bar high. So far he's turning out to be one of the worst in history and he just started! Just wait until he starts some wars heh.
Either he is just hands down one of the worst presidents ever or the bankers that infest this administration put a gun to his head and said "do as we tell you!" probably a little of both!
buckinfitches 1 year ago
Single payer = cheaper and better.
sidewalkpilot 1 year ago
Where is the change we have been brainwashed with? No change just deceit! He uses the words GOD BLESS AMERICA Anyone who believes a word he says should search Obama religion, Obama slandering the bible. Obama says America is not a Christian Nation, I dare anyone who likes this liar to look it up/ Ho you see any change for the good in america? What has this Man done? Nothing!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Ufoevidence101 1 year ago
The brown clown circus ends in november vote them out
TIMONTOP 1 year ago
1:14 Barack Obama Plays to much halo
GAGAGAGALOL 1 year ago
Comment removed
GAGAGAGALOL 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"If you like your plan you're going to be able to keep your plan."
That is a lie.
TexasMedicine 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
something has to be done about this asshole!
thomasbaron06 1 year ago
America Is NOT ready for a black president
TheStockDayTrader 1 year ago