Added: 3 years ago
From: CSAWORDaudio
Views: 21,325
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (153)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • think of it like a V

    representing time (going vertically) where the bottom is the similar distant ancestor and the two top parts are us and monkeys at this time.

  • well that's why we're not descendant from monkeys, but we and monkeys have descended from a similar species that are just as equally extinct now as, say, homo-erectus :)

  • If this theory is real... why there are still monkeys at this time?

  • It is important to look at both sides of the coin - See 'A question of origins' to see scientific proof that shows how the theory of evolution is pretty much impossible. That is my personal opinion after looking at both sides

  • Please dont get confussed.

    Evolution deals with the biological development of an organism

    Natural selection deals with survival of the fittest

    The origin of species deals with were the species originally came from before evolving through evolution

  • @Solitarious2011 'best adapted' not 'survival of the fittest'

  • Alternative view of evolution see book video trailer

  • I don't see why burning it will distroy this theory. I don't think you should bother if you think evolution can prove your god wrong.. At least we don't believe that dinosuar existed with humans.. I think that evolution is a theory and what is god, a hypothesis or something lesser?... If you want to prove this evolution wrong than you have to prove that god is real. Got it... Oh me again with half the info. Sorry I will train again.

  • I read a little bit of the book it is so racist haha

    I wanna hear the racist documentary. Not this nice bullshit, this is not the way he really thought read the book from 1871 its crazy what he thought.

    if only i could find the racist one this sucks

  • It was good of Darwin to acknowledge A.R Wallace in this book. He also thanked Jospeh Hooker the botanist & Charles Lyell the geologist who argued that the earth was millions of years old and that the coast line had been shaped by million years of the waves crashing onto the shore. Both Lyell & Hooker were throughly nice men and gave Darwin a good degree of support and sympathy throughout his life

  • Sorry. The kkk went out of style in the 1950s. Deal with it.

    And BTW, nobody thinks that the Origin of Species is a sacred document. Its just ideas on paper, and destroying the paper does not destroy the idea, so no scientist is offended by your hatred of knowledge or your love of fire. Worship it for all we care.

  • The Origin of Species is false. All real Americans will burn a copy of the Origin of Species on October 1.

  • @HomleandSecurity Feel free to join all your kkk brethren on October 1 in the burning of books that make you think, and while you're at it do feel free to fuck off. You do not represent America, the safe haven of freedom of speech, and you most certainly do not represent its ideals. So as an American who believes in logic, reason, and truth I can passionately say you can take your ignorance and your hatred and go to your non-existent hell.

    Have a horrible day : )

  • @CommanderC4 I do represent America. I am the sole representative of America. What I say must be followed and obeyed.

    I burned a copy of Origin of Species on October 1.

    We will be burning the Origin of Species again on November 1.

  • christians if you have actually researched evolution and natural selection and still deny, then your stubborn. darwin is one of the greatest minds of all time and whoever wrote the bible is a moron, i bet if whoever wrote the bible could come to the future and see the problems in the world today, he wouldnt have wrote it. i mean they are actually so stubborn they say dinosaur bones were planted by scientists, how ridiculous is that, religion has scientifically held us back for 2000 years.

  • The Creator giving evodelusionists the finger!

    watch?v=y6DBv-vg-y0 pt 1

    watch?v=yXYlQ4_DI8A pt 2

  • I am a Christian and I believe evolution is a fact while I also believe in the Bible. I don't see the Bible to contradict Science and vice verca; I interrupt Genesis allegorically as revealing the truths about creation rather than facts about it. While I do believe evolution explains how basically everything came about, it doesn't explain morals, ethics and human spirituality. In other words, I believe such things can't be explained with naturalistic explanations no matter how hard we dig.

  • @Brummy010 There are many videos explaining how all animals that live in groups evolved niceness,altruism, and morals in our species. One video I can recommend, is: *An Evolutionary Basis For Morality*.: )

  • @winterstellar well that's obvious if we're evolved from them. Evolution does explain things such as niceness and especially altruism, but it doesn't explain the abstract morals and moral thinking like we have compared to the rest of the animal kingdom. I ain't denying what you're saying, but all I'm saying is that I believe that morals and human spirituality are inherited into nature by God than morality being a product of chance. Soz' for the late reply by the way.

  • ive studied evolution and the bible a long time.and i am a christian.and sware my faith ive never found anything that proves the bible is false but there are many things wrong with evolution...one thing is since dirt is not living it can not produce something living and evolutionists believe dirt randomly exploded in space.how can something non living explode with no cause and make something living.it doesnt ad up.and if you ask an evolutionist where the dirt came from he doesnt know.

  • @nobama7 Tell me, you idiot. How is it possible for a snake to talk and to tempt Adam and Eve? HOW THE FUCK DID MARY THE VIRGIN BECAME PREGNANT IF NOT HAVING A PRE-MARITAL SEX?! Why the fuck is it right to stone people who do not believe in God? WHY THE FUCK DID GOD WANTED TO KILL PEOPLE WHO DISOBEY HIS RULES?

    Why the fuck do you believe in such NONSENSE tales?

    YOU SIR, IS THE STUPIDEST CREATIONIST WHO EVER GRACED THE PLANET.

  • @nobama7 "ive studied evolution and the bible a long time.and i am a christian.and sware my faith ive never found anything that proves the bible is false but there are many things wrong with evolution..."

    This statement will be added to my collection of the stupidest dumb fucked comments on youtube.

    First Place.

  • WE ALL CAME FROM GOD OUR CREATOR...heres what happend to charle darwin...from the grave to the spirit from the spirit to the judgement.from judgement to hell.

  • @nobama7 prove it idiot

  • but what is the Natural Selection?

  • @amaxamon

    Didn't you read the descent of man by Darwin

  • Darwin had some help with his work from Josepeh Hooker who was a Botanist and Friend of Darwin. Hooker also went to the great evolution debate at Oxford in 1860 and together with Huxley defended Darwin's theory. Darwin himself was too ill to attend the debate himself.

  • Okay

    1. we were not descended from monkeys....sigh

    2. It's called The Theory of Special Creation and The Theory of Descent with Modification.

    3. Richard Dawkin's isn't crazy.

    4. Evolution is already accepted by most religions. "...guided by God." (Pope John Paul II).

    5. Read books! don't rely on what your pastor said...it's just sad.

  • @lydiamariacantu i forgot, did we come from monkeys or monkey like ancestors? i am being entirely serious because this is the fuzzy part to me.

  • @JoelB3783

    Humans did not evolve from monkeys. Humans are more closely related to modern apes than to monkeys, but we didn't evolve from apes, either. We share a common ancestor with modern African apes, like gorillas and chimpanzees.

  • @JoelB3783

    Scientists believe this common ancestor existed

    5 to 8 million years ago. Shortly thereafter, the species diverged into two separate lineages. One of these lineages ultimately evolved into gorillas and chimps, and the other evolved into early human ancestors called hominids. I hope I was able to answer your question in all entirety.

  • @JoelB3783

    This is the article that unveiled this common ancestor:

    Google

    "A new Late Miocene great ape from Kenya and its implications for the origins of African great apes and humans"

    and make sure you click on a ".gov" website to read it; PubMed or PNAS should have it.

  • @supersteve2525 Eugenics is part of America's ugly past, espoused even by popular presidents such as Teddy Roosevelt. But that's an ad hominum if true of Darwin. In other words, the use of a theory has no bearing on whether or not the theory is true.

    Newton seemed nutty in his own way, being very into alchemy, occult, "sacred geometry", but we hold none of this as reason against his laws of gravity.

    Rely on reference to the theories and arguments themselves, not the people that made them.

  • past? It's FLOODED OUR EDUCATION SYSTEM. RUINING OUR CHILDREN. THAT DOESN'T BUG YOU? institute of creation makes more sense than evolution and that doesnt stop teachers from teaching our kids that their brains capable of operating in paradigms and having a conciousness originated FROM A FISH.

    ludicrous.

  • All life on earth is related. Darwin realize this and today we know the genome of many species. DNA doesn't lie, evolution and natural selection are true.

    The bible makes many outragous claims with no evidence to support it; women are supposedly made from the ribs of men, there was day and night before the sun and moon, the human population started with 2 individuals in a garden, etc etc. All of these have been proves wrong and utterly dumb by science and logic

  • bull shit he never proved anything with cells.god made us and the bible is the evidence

    what evidence did he have other than a buch of dumb ass drwing he drew himself.

  • If you want to argue the merits of the evidence that is fine. My point was that it's a fallacy to dismiss an argument based on what you heard about those that put it forward.

    It's also wrong to dismiss a thing based on what people used it to justify.

    People use anything to justify their positions, especially racism. I recall many KKK members citing Bible scriptures for their brand of eugenics.

  • Also even believing what you say about Darwin, which I would cross reference. The theory was proposed jointly, so you'd have to dig up dirt on the other guy too lol

  • All relegions do is force fals and scientifically disproven dogma's like creation upon people with the promise of a happy afterlife of puppies and rainbows. That's why relegion goes hand in hand with war and oppression, because it hasn't got a leg to stand on against the sane and logical human being and therefor can only force their ridiculous teachings on them. 'Theory' of evolution is just a term by the way, we have as much prove as we can, the genome is deciphered

  • @supersteve2525 Where did you get this info? Because it's wrong. Darwin opposed eugenics (The Descent of Man). It was his cousin who proposed it.

  • god is faakee damnn jst face it

  • i wod if it woz true,but it jus aint

  • god isnt real yu know how i know? because use to be a cathoic and everyone would say god is he thing that made everything and jut pray. well i use to do that until i saw pictures of those kids that haven home or no food and you wonder if god is real why ont he help them, but te thng is hes not he is a theory that the peole back then made up so they can explain why everything is here andif y pray i bet you it wont come true so everyone who bealives in god is stupid and ignorant

  • he didnt create the wars we did

  • i think hes talkin crap 2 but des no ned 2 cust god

    jeees wot has da world com 2 .lol.

  • There's a great close relationship between GOD & EVOLUTION! I believe evolution is TRUE and the creation own of it is: GOD HIMSELF!  |: - P

  • I am fully convinced that species are not immutable,but that those belonging to what are called the same genera are lineal descendants of the some other and generally extinct species,in the same manner as the acknowledged varieties of any one species are the descendants of that species, Furthermore Natural selection has been the main but not exclusive means of the modification .

  • Comment removed

  • with respect, I disagree.

  • so u r a athiest?

    o & soz 4 all da complete crap

    i ment

    i feel in my own personal opinion that this is complete crap'

  • and how did you form your own personal opinion? what do you base it on?

  • science

    .lol.

    i've studied evolution for nearly a year now

  • nearly a year...

    good, and keep studdying-make sure your sources are unbiased, objective, and peer reviewed. 

    Is it evolution that is complete crap?

  • yeah..

    soz babz if i dissapoint u

  • you don't disappoint me at all....failure in any system of education dissapoints me, but not you. do you have questions on the process of evolution?

  • yeah,how come if you really believe in evolution would you put our "ancesters" in cages at zoo's?

  • Our ancestors are, by deffinition, deceased. All primates share a more recent common ancestor than they do with any other annimal. Chimpanzee and human share one as recently as 6 or 7 million years ago. Also, I've never put an animal in a cage unless I'm transporting it to the Vet for it's own health and well-being....then I take it back home. Zoo's weren't my idea.

  • kk ..

  • i'm a geologist and find evidence of evolution every day. you are person with a dogmatic believe, so don't say you find evidence against evolution in science. all your "studies" are based on the religion you believe, not reason.

  • monkey-fish-frog had butt-sex with that monkey; that monkey had a mutant retard baby that screwed another monkey and that made you. So there you go.

    ... You're the retarded offspring of five monkeys having butt-sex with a fish-squirrel. Congratulations!"

  • @5X12345 Than k you for proving conclusively just how stupid fundies really are

  • hw cn u b a christian [a]nd an athiest?

    hw exacly does dat work?

  • Pure class from Trey Parker and Matt Stone.

  • "In the beginning we were all fish... okay... swimming around in the water. And then one day a couple of fish had a retard baby, and the retard baby was different, so it got to live.

    So retard fish goes on to make more retard babies, and then one day a retard baby fish crawled out of the ocean with its... mutant fish hands... and it had... butt-sex with a squirrel or something, and made this retard frog-squirrel, and then that had a retard baby which was a monkey-fish-frog, and then this

  • @5X12345 That's how YOU were made. The rest of us evolved.

  • in ur opinion

    and im sorry but ur opinion is wrong

  • he is right but it is much better to a world with no religion. there is an error to the words that he said. he said that there is no proof that there is God. but how did the theist is more invulnerable than the atheist about god. maybe you should think about it before saying those words. atheist focus more in logic.

  • i dont get HOW people can have faith in god/jesus when theres no proof lol, the bible is complete nonsence....darwins theory is correct, natural selection is correct, the world would be a much better place with no religion, imo religious people are seriously brainwashed from the comments that iveread...its nuts, go read a science book people, are religious goofs scared of death and think if they praise an imaginary being there whole life they will get into heaven?

  • I don't suppose you've actually read the origin of species...even Darwin admitted unless "transitional species" were found his THEORY was just that. Not too mention that scores of ATHEIST scientist now believe that the theory is false. That doesnt prove the existence of God, just that Darwin was wrong...

  • the proof is all around us

    soz 2 burst ur bubble babes but itz true

  • lmao

    knucklehead.

  • ur right about das bible but sadly wrong bout da rest .soz. .

  • i think Charles Darwins sole perpose in life was to test the faith of christains

  • Seeing as he was a christian himself...

  • true say

  • English, do you speak it?

  • @BuLLe7pRoFF Too bad you didn't learn to spell. It's PURPOSE. Read something besides the bible

  • u go brother

  • Comment removed

  • Science and religon have never gotten along

  • more like fact and fiction have never got along

  • they wod get along if 1 side admitted they were wrong

  • not stricly true

    only som religions

  • isnt wierd how in every religon something comes down from the sky 0.0 well i think aliens came down here and the acient ppl thought that they were gods soo thats how the religon started

  • no

    thats how christianity started and all dem other religions

  • face it, darwins theory explains everything, we live, we die then we rot in the ground, so go out and enjoy yourself while your alive

  • i aint gonna face it coz itz not true

  • hey just my thoughts no need 2 get all huffy

  • Hey- just a point to consider- the majority of educated Christians are capable of accepting the rather obvious (but nevertheless brilliant) explanation of the origin of species while still keeping their faith.

    Darwin explains how life came about, Genesis explains why life came about.

    Through the process of evolution, new lifeforms are created every day.

    You cannot deny fossil evidence and ongoing examples of evolution.

    Darwin was only wrong as far as Newton was.

  • yeah i am catholic but i might change because of the evidence there is in the world

  • Please! Here are some questions for you. How come man has not evolved into anything yet? When is man going to? How can you date a fossil? You can't date it by the rock that it came out of! How can you date the rock? You can't date the rock by what came out of it! That is thinking in a circle. Atheists, get a life!! Jesus rules!!

  • dude i am catholic

  • ddue god is fake hes just a imagenary thing lol

  • you cant prove that you dont have the evidence

  • dude what ur saying is implausible. theres a missing link in darwins explanation on evolution its like saying ape- ape- ape- ape- blank- human theres a missing fossil clue.

  • thank u!!!!!!!!! finally som1 who has a brain

  • You only think he has a brain because it confirms your silly Muslim superstitions.

  • Wow, you really need to get an education outside of your church. That tired old 'missing link' argument has been used for decades, and it's been explained time and time again.

  • yeah your right. anyways i am only 13 years old. don't understand it that much

  • Could you upload the whole book please?

  • Darwin's utterances are a great reference point for how, why, etc The bible however is an interesting piece of fiction that has managed to trick the insecure masses for hundreds of years.

  • Mmmm.... looks like you know a lot more about Darwin than me. Main difference between Darwin and this "god" is that Darwin really existed !!!

  • So says the person who probably couldn't mention 3 books in the bible off the top of his head. And knows only what he has heard about biblical text. And in the end, has the nerve to believe it is a false, fictitious book with no reason as to why it is.

  • Spent 15 years at a church school, was made to read the books of the bible every day, but they couldn't brainwash me, now in my senior years I have seen the truth!!! Grow up and you all will, it is liberating and empowering - try it!!!

  • I bet your school taught you evolution doesn't exists? And that our earth is 6,000 yrs old? Or perhaps the big bang is a fairy tale? And later, after an education you realize those things do exists, so the bible must be incorrect. Try looking at the bible how it is meant to be read, in a non-literal reading fashion such as a poem. A text harboring within it subtext. In this you will come to find a truth with the bible.

  • The truth lies with people, have a little faith my son, think the best of people and you will prosper. Dispatch religion to the sidelines and give your best to your fellow person. Peace & Love

  • peace and love bro

    peace and love

  • u right bout som things but wrong bout others

    they changed the bible sooooooo f'in many times so even if it used to b da word of god(which it isnt)it certainly aint now

  • "So says the person who probably couldn't mention 3 books in the bible off the top of his head"

    Ad hominem attacks for the win.

  • Your ignorance to 150 years of research, reason and corroborative evidence amazes me.

    Go to college, get a bachelor's degree in biology. Go to graduate school for evolutionary biology. Write your dissertation supporting this claim

    "His evolutionary ideas are inaccurate, false, and completely refuted"

    Win Nobel prize. Then I will convert and try to convince my friends to convert to Christianity.

  • I am in college, perhaps a more prestigious one than you have ever set foot on.

    There are many well-respected, world renown scientists who are harsh critics of darwinism.

    Evolution is a proven fact, there is no doubt about it. But do not confuse that with the same fallacies Darwin wrote about in "Origin of Species."

    A dissertation? You do understand that there have been peer-reviewed journals from Science, Physical Review D, JSTOR, and many more which have fully explained

  • no soz babz but it aint never been proven.

    until i c a monkey turn into a human it will ALWAYS remain a THEORY not a FACT

    2 VERY different things

  • the problems Darwinian evolution has aroused.

    Before you lay attack on my education and/or knowledge of the subject, actually tell me what it is you would like to debate. I would be more than happy to debunk your idol's teachings.

  • I would like to debate the fact that goat cheese is delicious.

    QED.

    I win.

  • Precisley my point. Uneducated attackers who unconditionally defend a viewpoint, but don't know why. Fail

  • is it

    goats cheese is delish

    wow i gotta try dat som time

  • yeah man i salut da 1st bit

    just not da 2nd bit

  • @happyjihad It is not Christianity

  • "At some future period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilised races of man will almost certaintly exterminate and replace throughout the world the savage races." C.Darwin-Decent of man.

    Darwin the british imperial racist!

  • you're all wrong, the flying spaghetti monster is responsible for earth and its inhabitants. Its okay, i wont hold it against you...and neither will he.

  • Finding similarities between the bones of the human hand to those contained within a whale's fin proves that Man & whale share similarities in bone-structure when one compares a human's hand to a whale's fin. Therefor: they are the same. Their common ancestor is WHALE BOY.

  • you are an idiot

  • thanx finally som1 who has a brain

  • just coz i have a SIMILAR hand as ? dont mean we hav da sam mamma

    do it?

  • thive got a quesyion did richard dawkins or charles darwin ever try to prove the bible wrong? like read it

  • Evolution by means of natural selection does prove the bible wrong with regard to the origin of man. So there's Darwin's answer to the bible's assertion that god created Adam and Eve.

    Read "The God Delusion" for Dawkins'. I'll need to reread it for specifics, but I'm pretty sure he has a lot to say about the physical impossibility of biblical events.

    But if you read and understand any of the major sciences (physics, biology, geology, etc.) it becomes clear that the bible is wrong.

  • the bible is gods word andive heard scientist say that there is no way evolution is possible andthere are huge hoaxes across the fossil record kirk cameron and ray comfort even tried to prove the bible wrong and now there christians darwin used to pray for stength to wrong home and dawkins probably never tried to prove the bible wrong and if he did try he only looked at a couple of things you have to look at alot of ways to prove the bible wrong just not what you want to study

  • Sweetheart, how about punctuation?

    How do you know the bible is god's word? Probably because some priest or other believer told you it was and you believe it. It's clear that the bible was written by men, not a supernatural being. Why else are there so many contradictions in it?

    Most well-respected scientists now accept that evolution is fact. What hoaxes in the fossil record? You'll have to elaborate before I'll believe that.

    Oh, and Kirk Cameron is an idiot. My cat could out-debate him.

  • the bible is gods word because he tells us and yes it was handwritten by men but it was authorized by god there are no contradiction and the hoaxes are piltdown man other stPaluxy Man-Dinosaur Tracks Minnesota Iceman

  • "the bible is gods word because he tells us"

    I'm sorry, but that's not good enough proof for me. I mean anyone could write a book and say it was divinely inspired. The fact that this one is 2000 years old doesn't mean it's any more credible.

    The hoaxes you list were perpetrated by men for some nefarious purpose or other, but that doesn't mean the rest of the fossil record is a hoax.

    And yes, the bible is FULL of contradictions. If you don't see them, you haven't read the bloody thing.

  • where?

  • Well, for one thing, the different stories about the resurrection told by the authors of the books of the new testament.

    There is a lot of literature available on these questions - I suggest you do some homework. Read Bart Ehrman, he's a biblical scholar and he's got TONS. I'm done because YouTube's 500 character limit is driving me insane.

    I answered your original question and now I have other things to do - a life to lead. Have a nice night.

  • hey it must be nice

  • thax finally som1 who has a brain!

  • arrrrrrrrhhhhhhhh

    u have a cat i have 2

    kiara and narla

    sooooooo cute

  • I'm astonished almost daily by how little Christians actually know about their own religion. Few I've met have ever read their own Bible, and have no clue what it's all about. As an Atheist I'm both amused and horrified that I have to teach them about Christianity.

    Few know, for instance, that two contradictory stories are told in Genesis regarding the creation of Adam and Eve. Few have pondered how their sons could have acquired wives. And few know how many errors exist throughout the book.

  • True, Sheldonwh.

    It's astonishing. And frightening.

  • thanx finally som1 who has a brain

  • Molto interessante. Grazie per aver inserito questo video documento. VM

  • its amazing to see how clever people were with limited technology but how stupid they are with the most from technology.if you tell this to a christian he/she would say that he was possessed by the devil...how ignorant

  • Most interesting! What a man,way before his time.

  • Indeed very interesting . The Origin of Species really showes the truth about how nature came into existence . Richard Dawkins is the most appropriate person to narate/read it .

  • First view & comment! Thanks for uploading this, very interesting.

  • Thanks - was not sure if YouTubers would like audiobooks.

    glad you liked it.

    You inspire me to make some more.

  • I ADORE audiobooks. I've loved being read to my entire life, and Dawkins has the PERFECT voice and accent for making science understandable and fun to listen to.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more