Added: 5 years ago
From: IrishRepublicanMedia
Views: 5,733
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (45)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • he must have gotten caught after taking that shot, all the smoke

  • ira sniper

  • up ira

    Tiocfaidh ar la

  • Up the Ra Tiocfaidh ar la!

  • i believe that there was an ira sniper with a 50 cal that pissed of the brits so much that they sent like 30 sas guys after him but never got him came close but he got away not sure how many soldiers he ot

  • Yeah it was how the DC snipers got the idea for the in the trunk shooter. Some IRA soldiers had outfitted a car to fire a 50 cal sniper rifle through a peephole in the trunk. The Brits eventually found the car with the rifle inside, but never the shooter/spotters.

  • they got them alright and the barret 90 cal! but they didnt execute them because of the peace process

  • Fuck you you American piece of shit.

  • It was a real attack. I saw footage of the sniper with a Brigade of Provos forming up to ambush a British Foot Potrol.

  • was his name Eamonn Wright? LOL He had a good score, 14-0 i believe

  • It's true that even Maj John Plaster the author of The Ultimate Sniper and retired US Army, SOG operator in Vietnam- wrote that out of all guerilla forces worldwide the Irish had the most advanced and professional sniping campaign.

  • mick carher. he was aressted and they found his barret 90 in a car trailer. now the barret 416 is better than the 50 cal. ronnie barret thinks so!

  • you never got all of them ,you stupid fuck .

  • It's just a clip taken from the IRA training video he did shot anyone.

  • shame we never got seeing wat he shot after it was shot TAL

  • "and im done with ya till you wish to argue the point" You're obviously a man of principle as this was five postings ago! My original query was to htucker31 who'd written "would youse stop winning" which has a totally different meaning to "would you stop WHINING" He also wrote "None tortured then shot" which is almost the opposite of "None. Tortured then shot" which is presumably what he meant. If you can get it in America read "Eats shoots and leaves" by Lynn Truss

  • where can I get a "sniper at work road sign" t-shirt?

  • amd no one sees

  • What a fucken joke

  • he must be another ill educated snout who aint got two brain cells to rub together winning lol dirty orange inbred bastard learn to spell

  • nice edit lol

  • A Kid lies in ditch wearing a balaclava and with a bit of editing appears to "shoot" a soldier. I suppose as a recruitment film it might appeal but only to a certain mentality. Is this REALLY the way forward??

  • Don't u just get sick of the provos soon as the shit hits the fan its "don't shoot me its against the rules I 'll do 5 years in kesh, and get me pension when I am released". How many police/ soldiers were released if the ira got their hands on them? None tortured then shot.

    If you play big boys games take big boys rules.

    WOULD YOUSE STOP WINNING ITS ALL YOUSE EVER DO FOR FUCKS SAKE.

  • htucker31 surely you mean "would you stop WHINING" ?The way you've written it takes on a completely different meaning. Look up "Thick Twat" in dictionary!

  • yet you couldnt argue his actual point.ah grammar nazism,the ultimate defense when you've had your dick handed to you on the internet.

  • Shadow ..Of course you're right ..Now what exactly was his point?

  • his point was that your a hippy liberal that thinks all conflicts can be resolved with candy and rainbows.cant say i disagree,most of the public has had this dopy mentallity since the 60's anyway.though i suppose stuff like terrorism never effected your life,so what the fuck do you care?balaclava's arent exclusive to terrorist.the guy shooting the soldier was symbollic of that countries skills in sniping,nothing else.hippy.

  • "your" I think you mean "you're" .."mentallity" I think you mean "mentality" .."effected" I think you mean "affected" and do you mean that don't disagree that all conflicts can be resolved with "candy and rainbows"? .. Most colleges now run courses in basic English ..Love and Peace

  • -chuckles-point proven.when you cant argue against a point,you attack spelling and grammar.what a waste of bandwith.

  • Unfortunately you need spelling snd grammar to make your point in the first place ..Now just what was your point??

  • typical hippy position:when ya cant win an arguement,do your damndest to change the topic.

  • A typical hippy position is number 43! Far from changing the topic, I'm asking you what your topic was? Easy question But I doubt you've got an answer  Love and Peace Man

  • ive told you the topic almost 3 times.your willfull ignorance is amusing,yet oddly frustrating at the same time.

  • I think the clue is in the word "almost" Or perhaps the clue is in your title "shadow" i.e. not all there

  • are you implying that shadows are not all there by basis of transparency?and then using the analogy to call me stupid?my arguement hasnt changed.your deviation from the topic at hand is still at play.and im done with ya till you wish to argue the real point.silly little man.

  • Just that shadows are an image of the real thing. As by your own admission you've "almost" told me the topic why don't you go the whole hog and "actually" tell me the topic then I could argue the point too! P.S. "Arguement" is actually spelt argument ..See my previous comment on learning basic English before you get embroiled in discussion

  • -chuckles as he watches the futility of circular logic in play-

  • You're not American by any chance are you?

  • nay,i am an entity that exists purely off of the internet.mentioning one's land of dwelling is almost always some sure fire way of generialization.especially if your some sort of european.(and to the short bus folks out there,that was sarcasm)

  • "generialisation" I think you mean generalisation, .."especially if your ..." surely it's 'if you're'. Your President set the standards for generalisation and they don't come much lower than that

    Do I take your (yet again) refusal to answer the question as an embarassment about your nationality

  • my lack of expressing my nationality,if it wasnt made obviuos by the sentence in the parenthesis,was a smartass 'yes' to your question.your circular arguements and will full ignorance,coupled with grammar nazism to derail the topic at hand is luaghable,and your debate skills are to be mocked by anyone past the 9th grade.

  • "obviuos"??, "arguements"??, "luaghable"?? "and will full ignorance"?? Try Esperanto, English is obviously too difficult

  • "who needs to debate when you can nit-pick spelling"

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more