The only way you could be against the anti-ladies night movement is if you're against public accommodation laws generally (or unless you're wholly irrational and believe that laws should not apply to the benefit of males). Even if you dislike public accommodation statutes, why not support this? Don't you people get that rigid application of the law is one of the fastest ways to stop expansive laws from coming into effect/remaining in force? Textual application encourages less expansive laws.
@SunSunSuperFun In fact, if presented properly in court, this would be found to be non-discriminatory, since ladies night is expressly meant to draw ladies to an establishment for the benefit of men, who want them there for their own appreciation. The men who come because of ladies night accept the conditions as being a benefit to them. Less expansive laws is a worthy goal, but common sense application of existing laws should be enforced by the public in choosing their representatives.
As a man I love ladies night at bars. Where ever they are having a ladies night is a place to find the women.
I wonder if the politicians would be fine with outlawing free drinks for vets and active military. Of course not they are part of the protected enforcer class.
Maybe the bars should charge politicians double until the ladies night ban is lifted?
Your rights protect you from being discriminated based on race, religion, or gender, they do not protect people from discrimination based on occupation. It is not discrimination to give vets and active military free drinks. It would be discrimination to give only blacks free drinks, or only Christians, ect.
Understand your rights, because without them we will have nothing.
Anti-male discrimination is rampant. For example, in Las Vegas, the EEOC compelled the casinos to hire female dealers in the 70's. Binions casino payed the fine year after year because they refused to change and hire female dealers. The cocktail watresses have always been female, and though men have tried to get into that lucrative position, the casinos refused to hire male drink servers. No EEOC fine for that.
it's not LADIES' night, it's LADIES night (no apostrophe) because the free drinks get them to come out and be hit on by us men. that's not discrimination against men, that's exploitation of ladies :D i think it's a win-win for both sexes
If reason is all for discrimination based on sex, then why stop there?
Why not argue that business be allowed to discriminate based on race? Why don't we re-legalize segregation? A business should be allowed to choose who it serves based upon whatever parameters it chooses.
Don't be hypocrites reason if you're going to champion discrimination then at least be honest about it.
@cultrox Re-read my post. I never claimed that reason came out against racial discrimination.
I stated that if Reason is going to advocate for businesses right to discriminate, then they should at least be honest about it. If reason is pro-discrimination, then they should publicly champion all discrimination, not just the politically correct anti-male kind. Which is the only kind of discrimination that presents its self as an easy target in the current zeitgiest.
As the #100 thumbs up I must say these are the kind of bull shit laws that need to be stopped! These kinds of laws like superfluous law suits are designed to congest our system of government and destroy it. Stop these fucking progressive liberals now!!
OK, Kirkpatrick, listen up: The reason the bars have ladies night is to make it easier for the men to meet women. Got that? It's not a bad thing for men. It's a good thing. OK? Now, accet that you're a clueless old stodge, shut up and sit down.
It's jerks like this that give the men's rights movement a bad name.
I think it's a far higher priority that we reform the imbalances between men and women in the legal system and government as opposed to trying to once again boss around private businesses, which should be free to do what they want. In regards to something such as this.
It's silly to have laws forcing idiots to pull up their pants. There's an easier way to get them to do that. It's called the truth. See, that trend of low-sagging pants like that was started in prisons. It was a signal to other inmates to let them know that you were "available," if you know what I mean.
@Wormtail81, it's actually designed to benefit the business, dummy. They think letting in more females attracts men. It's not some plot of the "patriarchy", nor is it like the women paying less is not beneficial to them as well; no on is forcing them to go to these places and pay less.
@Wcoltd ya cause we totally dont live in a country where everyone and thier grandma would call you a fag for going, they reason ladies night does so good is becasue of all the MEN that go that night and try to get lucky, they aren't making money off letting girls in for cheaper -_-
@kainniak1 Most people would probably think that it's gay, but free beer means guys would probably go anyway and the bar would be broke pretty quickly, yeah, your right, that's a horrible idea. I just want to one-up that deusch James Kirkpatrick. But then again maybe that's what he wants bars to do. Geez What a dick head.
Since when is the unequal delivery of the justice system illegal. they have many such inequality issues within the law such as hate crimes or discrimination laws ?
The low sagging pants I agree with. Ladies night com on thats a win win for everybody. And the superheroes thing is ridiculous. People dont have anything else better to do than banning super heroes.
@AJSensei lawl i like you logic, sagging pants i understand because it doesn't affect my freedom, but girls have to pay full price from now on FUCK THAT rofl, i mean its not like once they get in dudes arnt going to be paying for everting
Reason is playing the chivalrous white knight here. While I think businesses should be able to discriminate, there are far, far worse issues going on than making poor wimminz pay the same as men do. Give me a damn break. It's actually nice for some actual "equality" to be enforced against the usual beneficiaries of the discriminatory policies (women).
@WelfareRobot this is kinda un EZ i agree i stopped watching alot of programs online and on tv because they started to give "non news" stories, a.k.a gay right and health care, as far as i am conncerd every governemt every where should pay for medical and if two dudes wana butt fudge tell death do them part, then let them -_-
Apparently some of the costumed characters were harassing tourists, hence the crackdown. Of course this in no way excuses them from cracking down on all of them. Can't find an update but I have written the mayor about it.
@FatherTime89 Really, I'm conservative. I fuck and let other fuck. Real conservatism doesn't involve getting into others business so that argument fails. We're not talking about little church ladies that just judge...that isn't conservatism. Liberals are all about telling you what to do and they are pretty bad at doing it too.
How can bush sell out human life on a daily basis when he's no longer in office? I think the majority of the current Republicans and the current democrats are just two wings of the same bird. They pretend they have radically different policies but behind closed doors they play *ill scratch your back and you'll scratch mine and we'll pretend to hate each other while working toward the same goal*.
If a woman has to be bribed with free drinks to come out to a bar, she probably isn't going to be interested in finding a guy to hook up with her. Unless the guy she hooks up with is a super studly alpha male, whom she would have slept with anyway.
lol it isn't illegal private businesses or persons to discriminate like that. It's only illegal for government to discriminate. Fucking politicians.. know-nothing fucktards.
Commissioner of Human Rights? What a joke! This is 2010 America. "Human Rights Commission" sounds like something fit for a newly-democratic Burma or China or Cuba, not the U.S. Remember when the commissioner for the HRC in Canada actually tried to prosecute Ezra Levant just for reprinting or talking about the Danish Mohammed cartoons in his publication??
@whoo689 You said it. Commissioner of Human Rights--that shouldn't be needed. And thanks to him, lonely dudes trying to hook up at the bar will just have to work a little harder...
Finally men are standing up to the feminazis hahahahaha
Shonenut213 4 months ago
Nick Gillespie AKA Leather Man.
TravistheHuman 5 months ago
AUGUST 20, 2011, CAPITAL WEST WING. LEMONAIDE PROTEST.. BRING YOUR LEMONAIDE , CUPS AND ICE. 10CENTS A CUP..
marge113 6 months ago
that's right WOMEN we want our drinks cheap too....
salsa02 1 year ago
The only way you could be against the anti-ladies night movement is if you're against public accommodation laws generally (or unless you're wholly irrational and believe that laws should not apply to the benefit of males). Even if you dislike public accommodation statutes, why not support this? Don't you people get that rigid application of the law is one of the fastest ways to stop expansive laws from coming into effect/remaining in force? Textual application encourages less expansive laws.
SunSunSuperFun 1 year ago
@SunSunSuperFun In fact, if presented properly in court, this would be found to be non-discriminatory, since ladies night is expressly meant to draw ladies to an establishment for the benefit of men, who want them there for their own appreciation. The men who come because of ladies night accept the conditions as being a benefit to them. Less expansive laws is a worthy goal, but common sense application of existing laws should be enforced by the public in choosing their representatives.
lakesidelivin 9 months ago
Subscribe to this channel at your own peril. It shaved about 4 years off my life in mind-boggling frustration already.
tekproxy 1 year ago
As a man I love ladies night at bars. Where ever they are having a ladies night is a place to find the women.
I wonder if the politicians would be fine with outlawing free drinks for vets and active military. Of course not they are part of the protected enforcer class.
Maybe the bars should charge politicians double until the ladies night ban is lifted?
slimat420 1 year ago 2
@slimat420
Your rights protect you from being discriminated based on race, religion, or gender, they do not protect people from discrimination based on occupation. It is not discrimination to give vets and active military free drinks. It would be discrimination to give only blacks free drinks, or only Christians, ect.
Understand your rights, because without them we will have nothing.
whiskers123 1 year ago
Anti-male discrimination is rampant. For example, in Las Vegas, the EEOC compelled the casinos to hire female dealers in the 70's. Binions casino payed the fine year after year because they refused to change and hire female dealers. The cocktail watresses have always been female, and though men have tried to get into that lucrative position, the casinos refused to hire male drink servers. No EEOC fine for that.
megagagnon1 1 year ago
Stupidity in motion-At least this segment will always have plenty of material
nesterhaus 1 year ago
thumbs up
yougiberishtube 1 year ago
Yep...Americ's become just another nanny state...sigh...
cybervore 1 year ago
it's not LADIES' night, it's LADIES night (no apostrophe) because the free drinks get them to come out and be hit on by us men. that's not discrimination against men, that's exploitation of ladies :D i think it's a win-win for both sexes
andristic 1 year ago
I know it's hard for some authoritarians to comprehend.
But ladies night actually benefits men!
Freethought42 1 year ago
Is Nick Gillespie posing as a super hero? at 00:27 I think he is... or is being detained as the evil doer?
koztowz 1 year ago
Ladies night is good for everybody. Stupid F**king Liberal A**wipe!
82compoundw 1 year ago
@82compoundw Ladies night is not good for me - i'm an alcoholic man looking for Man's night!
megagagnon1 1 year ago
So with that logic, "Kids eat free" and Senior discounts should also be banned.
lilgreymouse 1 year ago 2
@lilgreymouse
Don't forget places that "cops eat free" ;p
Freethought42 1 year ago
@Freethought42
Freedom of discrimination is based on things like religion, gender and race. Not based on occupation. Know your rights!
whiskers123 1 year ago
@whiskers123
Then why won't that hooters across town hire me?
I should be free from gender discrimination.
Freethought42 1 year ago
@Freethought42
You must be under qualified. :p
whiskers123 1 year ago
If reason is all for discrimination based on sex, then why stop there?
Why not argue that business be allowed to discriminate based on race? Why don't we re-legalize segregation? A business should be allowed to choose who it serves based upon whatever parameters it chooses.
Don't be hypocrites reason if you're going to champion discrimination then at least be honest about it.
insdel2004 1 year ago
@insdel2004 when did Reason say that businesses shouldn't be allowed to discriminate based on race ?
cultrox 1 year ago
@cultrox Re-read my post. I never claimed that reason came out against racial discrimination.
I stated that if Reason is going to advocate for businesses right to discriminate, then they should at least be honest about it. If reason is pro-discrimination, then they should publicly champion all discrimination, not just the politically correct anti-male kind. Which is the only kind of discrimination that presents its self as an easy target in the current zeitgiest.
insdel2004 1 year ago
batman in jail.... joker in a white house... what a times
grraadd 1 year ago 2
The real kick in the head is that this idiot is PAID by tax payers to be an idiot. Can't he be an idiot on his own dime?
averagejoe040 1 year ago
As the #100 thumbs up I must say these are the kind of bull shit laws that need to be stopped! These kinds of laws like superfluous law suits are designed to congest our system of government and destroy it. Stop these fucking progressive liberals now!!
MsWanderer1 1 year ago
OK, Kirkpatrick, listen up: The reason the bars have ladies night is to make it easier for the men to meet women. Got that? It's not a bad thing for men. It's a good thing. OK? Now, accet that you're a clueless old stodge, shut up and sit down.
jlewisda 1 year ago
It's jerks like this that give the men's rights movement a bad name.
I think it's a far higher priority that we reform the imbalances between men and women in the legal system and government as opposed to trying to once again boss around private businesses, which should be free to do what they want. In regards to something such as this.
bigboss686 1 year ago 4
Minnesota has a department of human rights? L2 budget amirite?
Guest655321 1 year ago
I'd bet 10 bucks that guy got turned down by a chick on ladies night, and now he's just pissed
lonercarrot 1 year ago 3
They are also discriminating against people who have no money to pay for drinks.
Guess they gotta be shut down.
Thill029 1 year ago 4
It's silly to have laws forcing idiots to pull up their pants. There's an easier way to get them to do that. It's called the truth. See, that trend of low-sagging pants like that was started in prisons. It was a signal to other inmates to let them know that you were "available," if you know what I mean.
MikeTMerciless 1 year ago
Ladies night is definitely designed to BENEFIT MEN.
Wormtail81 1 year ago 5
@Wormtail81, it's actually designed to benefit the business, dummy. They think letting in more females attracts men. It's not some plot of the "patriarchy", nor is it like the women paying less is not beneficial to them as well; no on is forcing them to go to these places and pay less.
WelfareRobot 1 year ago
@WelfareRobot Relax, WelfareRobot. I am much, much closer to Anachro-Capitalist than feminist. I think you just misunderstood me. I was in jest.
Wormtail81 1 year ago
NY is still the worse state to live in for freedom
InTheEndIWasRight 1 year ago 2
private businesses can do whatever they want set special prices for whoever they want. However govt buildings cant have ladies night. What a joke
ForTehNguyen 1 year ago
@ForTehNguyen it would seem to be that your statement is untrue, the government dictates what people cant do not what they can these days.
surrealnumber 1 year ago
YEESSS!! A ban on sagging pants!!
Why do I think it's good? In the ghetto where I live, the guys don't wear underwear.
Chibiwaza 1 year ago
I've got an idea, have a man's night the day after.
Wcoltd 1 year ago
@Wcoltd ya cause we totally dont live in a country where everyone and thier grandma would call you a fag for going, they reason ladies night does so good is becasue of all the MEN that go that night and try to get lucky, they aren't making money off letting girls in for cheaper -_-
kainniak1 1 year ago
@kainniak1 Most people would probably think that it's gay, but free beer means guys would probably go anyway and the bar would be broke pretty quickly, yeah, your right, that's a horrible idea. I just want to one-up that deusch James Kirkpatrick. But then again maybe that's what he wants bars to do. Geez What a dick head.
Wcoltd 1 year ago
Since when is the unequal delivery of the justice system illegal. they have many such inequality issues within the law such as hate crimes or discrimination laws ?
hobo59 1 year ago
They are messing with ladies night! I smell a revolution brewing!
XCritonX 1 year ago
Comment removed
CitizenTommy 1 year ago
This is bullshit, mon...
jimwalsh2001 1 year ago
The low sagging pants I agree with. Ladies night com on thats a win win for everybody. And the superheroes thing is ridiculous. People dont have anything else better to do than banning super heroes.
AJSensei 1 year ago
@AJSensei lawl i like you logic, sagging pants i understand because it doesn't affect my freedom, but girls have to pay full price from now on FUCK THAT rofl, i mean its not like once they get in dudes arnt going to be paying for everting
kainniak1 1 year ago
I have to agree with the ladies night. It is sexist..
Gplex 1 year ago
if stupidity could fly this guy wolud be a skylark
rsobies 1 year ago
Reason is playing the chivalrous white knight here. While I think businesses should be able to discriminate, there are far, far worse issues going on than making poor wimminz pay the same as men do. Give me a damn break. It's actually nice for some actual "equality" to be enforced against the usual beneficiaries of the discriminatory policies (women).
WelfareRobot 1 year ago 2
@WelfareRobot this is kinda un EZ i agree i stopped watching alot of programs online and on tv because they started to give "non news" stories, a.k.a gay right and health care, as far as i am conncerd every governemt every where should pay for medical and if two dudes wana butt fudge tell death do them part, then let them -_-
kainniak1 1 year ago
Without Batman, there's no one to stop all these Jokers.
MooseOfReason 1 year ago
@MooseOfReason
why so serious?
SuperAtheist 1 year ago
@SuperAtheist I'm only burning my half.
Wait, that didn't make any sense. Lol.
MooseOfReason 1 year ago
Apparently some of the costumed characters were harassing tourists, hence the crackdown. Of course this in no way excuses them from cracking down on all of them. Can't find an update but I have written the mayor about it.
FatherTime89 1 year ago
i saw a cop shoot a homeless guy right in front of me in evanston illinois.
oiuoiu988 1 year ago
@oiuoiu988 no way and what does this have to do with anything
kainniak1 1 year ago
@kainniak1
well its just another sign of statism gone wild...
oiuoiu988 1 year ago
Douche.
sniper6081 1 year ago
These douche bag politicians make stupid laws, but they wont secure the boarder.
hawkermustang 1 year ago
Why are they cracking down on super heros? They never bother anyone and they're great for tourists. It just blows my mind at the total pointlessness.
FatherTime89 1 year ago 3
@FatherTime89 Obviously they have to get rid of the superheroes because those are a competition to the state monopoly on law enforcement.
TimothyBragan 1 year ago 45
@TimothyBragan ROFLMAO!!! NICE!!!
Kris246zl 1 year ago
Ugh. Every guy should be against this.
Ladies Night makes it less of a "sausage-fest" at most bars.
bananaphone07 1 year ago 2
@bananaphone07 Liberals are the original cock-blockers
Ruinous 1 year ago
Comment removed
FatherTime89 1 year ago
@FatherTime89 Really, I'm conservative. I fuck and let other fuck. Real conservatism doesn't involve getting into others business so that argument fails. We're not talking about little church ladies that just judge...that isn't conservatism. Liberals are all about telling you what to do and they are pretty bad at doing it too.
Ruinous 1 year ago
@Ruinous And those who get into everyone's business aren't exactly real liberals either.
FatherTime89 1 year ago
@Ruinous rofl ya and republicans are the original scum bags that would sell their mom a buck
kainniak1 1 year ago
@kainniak1
Are you a socialist? You don't sound very smart when you say uneducated things like "republicans would sell their mothers for a buck".
zetsway5000 1 year ago
@zetsway5000 well i am srry, i feel like bush and the republic party as a whole sell out human life daily =/
kainniak1 1 year ago
@kainniak1
How can bush sell out human life on a daily basis when he's no longer in office? I think the majority of the current Republicans and the current democrats are just two wings of the same bird. They pretend they have radically different policies but behind closed doors they play *ill scratch your back and you'll scratch mine and we'll pretend to hate each other while working toward the same goal*.
zetsway5000 1 year ago 2
@zetsway5000 Don't feed the trolls.
Anakha13 1 year ago
@bananaphone07
If a woman has to be bribed with free drinks to come out to a bar, she probably isn't going to be interested in finding a guy to hook up with her. Unless the guy she hooks up with is a super studly alpha male, whom she would have slept with anyway.
insdel2004 1 year ago
facsist
mekaview 1 year ago
lol it isn't illegal private businesses or persons to discriminate like that. It's only illegal for government to discriminate. Fucking politicians.. know-nothing fucktards.
ZombieX13 1 year ago 3
Commissioner of Human Rights? What a joke! This is 2010 America. "Human Rights Commission" sounds like something fit for a newly-democratic Burma or China or Cuba, not the U.S. Remember when the commissioner for the HRC in Canada actually tried to prosecute Ezra Levant just for reprinting or talking about the Danish Mohammed cartoons in his publication??
whoo689 1 year ago
@whoo689 You said it. Commissioner of Human Rights--that shouldn't be needed. And thanks to him, lonely dudes trying to hook up at the bar will just have to work a little harder...
JBSauce 1 year ago
You said it Mcqueen! F***ing bureaucrats...
Drmeanbean 1 year ago
Authoritarian twats
Morrakiu 1 year ago 37