You could, if you were funny and smart - rather than just educated and stupid - have teased out of him things that he knows. Like, with humour, you know? (I mean Duuuuuh!!!). Instead, You aked banal questions, and then you hilariously threw a custard pie in his face. It was all about the punchline! : your brilliantly hilarious olive oil joke! Ha, ha, fucking ha! My baby brother laughed at this. Like his daddy did at the funny antics of Benny Hill. This is 2009. Get back in the DeLorean.
I cannot imagine that many people, Rosafanta, are stupid enough to interpret the olive oil as a 'custard pie in his face'. You're on the wrong track, so pipe down.
Shit! I'm on the wrong track! Here was silly little me thinking that you were trying to be oh-so-funny by ironically referring to the oil drum that the Sun toiletpaper put in front of his house. Obviously you are far more subtle than that. Perhaps you used the extra virgin olive oil to point out how pure his motives are. Or something. I love subtlety. How subtle were you being? Come on! Surprise me!
Oh it wasn't particularly subtle, Rosafanta. About 5, on a scale of 1 to 10. I guess someone of your manichean bent steps out of her depth around the '3' mark. Now, read this carefully and you may want to take notes: sharing a joke with someone is distinct from throwing 'a custard pie' in their face. Surprised?
I'm hurt! :-( Nobody ever gave me less than an 8.5 before! ;-) Anyway thanks for the lesson. I could tell that your sympathies were with him, which is cool, but I just thought you could have pushed him a bit harder. Anyway, to be honest with you, I was still pissed off with you for the Anne Widdecombe thing. I would have liked to see you skewer that bitch. Somebody should.
Hey, look on the bright side. You probably put the frigid bitch in a shitty mood for the rest of the day! ;-) Sorry for being such a bitch to you before. :-(
could someone please tell me why georgre galloway ,would like to see ron paul in the white house, im a bit puzzeld,i am certinly to the left, this is a genuine question .someone please reply.
Because he is a good man. And he sees another good man in Ron Paul. Ron Paul is that rare thing - a good man. And good women are just as rare - and Hillary Clinton is not one of them.
Obama is gonna spread the war on "terror" to places like Pakistan and Iran. So will Hillary. So will McCain. You can't win unless you see through the bullshit of the media making them look like they are actually competing when it's all a charade to marginalize candidates like Ron Paul and Mike Gravel. If George was paying more attention to American politics he would see right through this bullshit with intelligence like his. If he can't support Paul cause of the right wing then support Gravel.
Galloway only supports Ron Paul due to his foreign policy. They are diametrically opposed on domestic policy. As a socialist, Galloway espouses a major role for the state, Paul is opposed to all that. I'd like to hear more from Galloway on Ron Paul. For what it's worth, I think both are goodmen and they'd most probably respect each other despite strong disagreements over domestic issues.
Speedy, Galloway has no clue about American politics. If he only knew about Obama's AIPAC leaning's he would retract these remarks immediately. Galloway is too loyal to polarized politics so he couldn't come out and support Ron Paul without looking like a traitor in the left wing community. Unfortunately, British politics are so much more complicated because their politicians actually talk about issues. In America we get sensationalism from politicians to confuse us. Ron Paul is the way though!!
Galloway is certainly not an expert on American politics but he knows enough to know that the leading candidates are all bought up. He, therefore, takes the candidates on that basis and weighs up the shades of poison. GG seems on some occasions to concede that but on others he gets lost in this left wing revere of his. I sense Ron Paul got the coverage that he did was so that the US establishment could measure what resistence there actually was.
the only reasons Galloway gave for not supporting Ron Paul is that he doesn't think he'll win the nomination or if he does he won't win the presidency. This coming from someone who's chances of beating oona king were slim to none.
Galloway is brilliant but he is making the same mistake that most American voters make;
voting for who they think can win instead of voting for who they WANT to win.
He didn't want Ron Paul to win. Obviously he agreed with Paul's foreign policy but on domestic Paul was right-wing in the extreme. Galloway himself described Paul's domestic ideas as 'law of the jungle'.
And in any case, having a balance between wanting someone to win and retaining realism about their actual prospects of winning is I think quite sensible.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Doesnt spend money on himself? What about that villa in Portugal George? That didnt come cheap did it. He is a slimy hypocritical demagogue with nought but his own bankrupt ideas & corrupt prejudices to stand on.
George Galloway - what an impressive man. Look at his assessment of Barrack Obama. He thinks Dennis Kucinich and Ron Paul are the best presidential candidates. What unites these two men? Both advocates of peace and the ONLY two members of their party that OPPOSED the war in Iraq. Does anything speak louder than a voting record? Wake up everyone, we need to move people like Galloway, Kucinich and Paul into the mainstream.
georgie, mr obama is now sending more boots into afghanistan. to hell with obama.
halflifeproductionz 1 year ago
chubby chubby cheek cheeks
MrSkosig 2 years ago
You could, if you were funny and smart - rather than just educated and stupid - have teased out of him things that he knows. Like, with humour, you know? (I mean Duuuuuh!!!). Instead, You aked banal questions, and then you hilariously threw a custard pie in his face. It was all about the punchline! : your brilliantly hilarious olive oil joke! Ha, ha, fucking ha! My baby brother laughed at this. Like his daddy did at the funny antics of Benny Hill. This is 2009. Get back in the DeLorean.
Rosafanta 2 years ago
I cannot imagine that many people, Rosafanta, are stupid enough to interpret the olive oil as a 'custard pie in his face'. You're on the wrong track, so pipe down.
EyebrowMagazine 2 years ago
Shit! I'm on the wrong track! Here was silly little me thinking that you were trying to be oh-so-funny by ironically referring to the oil drum that the Sun toiletpaper put in front of his house. Obviously you are far more subtle than that. Perhaps you used the extra virgin olive oil to point out how pure his motives are. Or something. I love subtlety. How subtle were you being? Come on! Surprise me!
Rosafanta 2 years ago
Oh it wasn't particularly subtle, Rosafanta. About 5, on a scale of 1 to 10. I guess someone of your manichean bent steps out of her depth around the '3' mark. Now, read this carefully and you may want to take notes: sharing a joke with someone is distinct from throwing 'a custard pie' in their face. Surprised?
EyebrowMagazine 2 years ago
I'm hurt! :-( Nobody ever gave me less than an 8.5 before! ;-) Anyway thanks for the lesson. I could tell that your sympathies were with him, which is cool, but I just thought you could have pushed him a bit harder. Anyway, to be honest with you, I was still pissed off with you for the Anne Widdecombe thing. I would have liked to see you skewer that bitch. Somebody should.
Rosafanta 2 years ago
Ah yes... Well, I admit I would have a harder time defending that interview ;-)
EyebrowMagazine 2 years ago
Hey, look on the bright side. You probably put the frigid bitch in a shitty mood for the rest of the day! ;-) Sorry for being such a bitch to you before. :-(
Nastyrandomgirl 2 years ago
Now who the hell is this pol slovenka prasica pretending to be me?! ;-)
Pička jo gleda!
Rosafanta 2 years ago
"Two cheeks of the same arse"
hahahahahaha
Tzimnewman4 2 years ago 4
could someone please tell me why georgre galloway ,would like to see ron paul in the white house, im a bit puzzeld,i am certinly to the left, this is a genuine question .someone please reply.
DeeBo1982 3 years ago
Non-interventionism.
j4ck2234 2 years ago 2
Because he is a good man. And he sees another good man in Ron Paul. Ron Paul is that rare thing - a good man. And good women are just as rare - and Hillary Clinton is not one of them.
Rosafanta 2 years ago
If all the leaders of the world were George Galloways the world would be a better place. I truely believe that
Ba3dadBoy 3 years ago
now u can put that in a pipe and smoke
KhmerD0g 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Osama-Obama can choose Galloway as his running mate!
mnnh1 3 years ago
" well, on camera, i'm not going into them all... "( on his vices ) Ohhh errr missus what a pear! Could have said " I'm not going to list them all..."
GG CANNOT be suggesting that sex is a vice, because every socialist knows it is not.
armandalegitcost 3 years ago
Obama is gonna spread the war on "terror" to places like Pakistan and Iran. So will Hillary. So will McCain. You can't win unless you see through the bullshit of the media making them look like they are actually competing when it's all a charade to marginalize candidates like Ron Paul and Mike Gravel. If George was paying more attention to American politics he would see right through this bullshit with intelligence like his. If he can't support Paul cause of the right wing then support Gravel.
MarsChambers 4 years ago
Galloway only supports Ron Paul due to his foreign policy. They are diametrically opposed on domestic policy. As a socialist, Galloway espouses a major role for the state, Paul is opposed to all that. I'd like to hear more from Galloway on Ron Paul. For what it's worth, I think both are goodmen and they'd most probably respect each other despite strong disagreements over domestic issues.
SpeedyMcAllistair 4 years ago
Speedy, Galloway has no clue about American politics. If he only knew about Obama's AIPAC leaning's he would retract these remarks immediately. Galloway is too loyal to polarized politics so he couldn't come out and support Ron Paul without looking like a traitor in the left wing community. Unfortunately, British politics are so much more complicated because their politicians actually talk about issues. In America we get sensationalism from politicians to confuse us. Ron Paul is the way though!!
MarsChambers 4 years ago
Galloway is certainly not an expert on American politics but he knows enough to know that the leading candidates are all bought up. He, therefore, takes the candidates on that basis and weighs up the shades of poison. GG seems on some occasions to concede that but on others he gets lost in this left wing revere of his. I sense Ron Paul got the coverage that he did was so that the US establishment could measure what resistence there actually was.
SpeedyMcAllistair 4 years ago
Where is this George Galloway "word generator"?
I tried google to no avail
sugarpuddin88 4 years ago
Yeah, I'd like to know this.
GeniusAndCharlatan 4 years ago
"to the arab world...clinton would be a disaster!!!!" Couldn't have been said better!
DarahKabad 4 years ago
the only reasons Galloway gave for not supporting Ron Paul is that he doesn't think he'll win the nomination or if he does he won't win the presidency. This coming from someone who's chances of beating oona king were slim to none.
Galloway is brilliant but he is making the same mistake that most American voters make;
voting for who they think can win instead of voting for who they WANT to win.
SuperAtheist 4 years ago 4
He didn't want Ron Paul to win. Obviously he agreed with Paul's foreign policy but on domestic Paul was right-wing in the extreme. Galloway himself described Paul's domestic ideas as 'law of the jungle'.
And in any case, having a balance between wanting someone to win and retaining realism about their actual prospects of winning is I think quite sensible.
malcolmprior11 4 years ago
if enough people think someone can't win an election, it becomes a self fulfilling prophecy.
SuperAtheist 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Doesnt spend money on himself? What about that villa in Portugal George? That didnt come cheap did it. He is a slimy hypocritical demagogue with nought but his own bankrupt ideas & corrupt prejudices to stand on.
dbww 4 years ago
George Galloway - what an impressive man. Look at his assessment of Barrack Obama. He thinks Dennis Kucinich and Ron Paul are the best presidential candidates. What unites these two men? Both advocates of peace and the ONLY two members of their party that OPPOSED the war in Iraq. Does anything speak louder than a voting record? Wake up everyone, we need to move people like Galloway, Kucinich and Paul into the mainstream.
roofryder23 4 years ago 6
Galloway is rock star and brave.
sahan93 4 years ago 4
GAlloway ROCKS !!!
moviesitara 4 years ago 3
"Brown n Blair - two cheeks of the same arse". LMAO!
temptation4life 4 years ago 13
This comment has received too many negative votes show
And Galloway's the hole in the middle
Raymond1970 4 years ago
n u r the one next to it. LMAO!
temptation4life 4 years ago 2