Town of Atkinson Moderator restricts photographer at public meeting

[dale3858]

Town officials and citizens committing treason...That is a public meeting...

[samten10a]

you may want to run that by a lawyer before reading in your meadings

 Title 42 chapter 21 subchapter 1 1983

1983. Civil action for deprivation of rights

Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected,

[samten10a]

any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity,

[samten10a]

or other proper proceeding for redress, except that in any action brought against a judicial officer for an act or omission taken in such officer’s judicial capacity, injunctive relief shall not be granted unless a declaratory decree was violated or declaratory relief was unavailable. For the purposes of this section, any Act of Congress applicable exclusively to the District of Columbia shall be considered to be a statute of the District of Columbia.

[dale3858]

NAZI...

[Sakamachi25]

He has no right to request he not be photographed in public.

[Sakamachi25]

Actually, he can request it, but the photographer can just refuse.

[askifICare]

What a prick.

[mAssBackwards]

Wow. That guy's out there, man.

[sribubba]

what a bunch of idiots.

[heyjackimback]

WW2 germany right here, right now, in Atkinson, NH>!

[themaclady]

I hate to inform you but, this MODERATOR CANNOT legally take a 'vote' to eradicate someone's RIGHTS under the RTK laws and every one who 'voted' to take away that right can and will be sued along with him.

If he did not want his photograph taken he can leave the meeting.

This man should be ousted from his position. THE MERE ACT of audiotaping, videotaping, or photographing the meeting UNDER THE LAW, cannot be considered 'disruptive'. Throwing chairs would be disruptive. This will cost him.

[georgedonnelly]

That's exactly what I was thinking. Their mistake was to submit their right to record audio and video at a public meeting to a vote. In fact, this is an example of a broader trend where people who are just exercising their rights get tricked into ostensibly losing their rights by subjecting their exercise of that to a majority vote.

Was he just upset about some guy with a camera? bc the video camera is also taking his picture!!