YouTube - Broadcast Yourself.

@Cosmored where is it now? Please send me a link

Years behind schedule, criminally over budget...Project scrubbed. NASA couldn't get its shit together.

We went from zero to the moon in ten years, now NASA with 20 or more years to prepare couldn't have the shuttle's replacement ready? The damn thing should be operational. Absolutely no excuse for it.

This is why you don't want the government involved in the space program...or ANY program for that matter.

KatsOlman 6 months ago

it sucks after all that work they landed off coarse on the ground and all died

FutureLaugh 6 months ago

They only stayed for like 10seconds. Very unrealistic. Did they came across deadly alens?

lol

Armigo91 7 months ago

cant wait till they send people to mars

jjanowitz2 9 months ago

i cant wait till they send people to mars

jjanowitz2 9 months ago

nice model

jbeatles99 9 months ago

I can't wait until they start this. It is awesome!!!

coasterandplane85 1 year ago

they'll never afford this. they'll just enslave the next four generations paying off hippy pensions.

andrelebaron 1 year ago

Comment removed

Calakaz 1 year ago

@Calakaz and you know this for a fact, or was there a book revealed on you from above?

iakny 1 year ago

haven't the already finished making the orion capsule?

SaMaG37 1 year ago

The moon? Been there, done that.

GodivaGirl1 1 year ago

@GodivaGirl1 It's more than just revisitin the moon. They are going to build a moon base on the moon. Then from the moon base, they will go to Mars.

SaMaG37 1 year ago

This has been flagged as spam show

I'm sort of excited that I'll be able to see people go to the moon in my lifetime, but, in all honesty, isn't it a little bit dumb that we're going back?

I'm not saying it's dumb just because we're going back, what I mean is, the first couple of times we went, we should have learned something about going to Mars. Who knows, if we had done that, maybe we'd be exploring Saturn's moons or reaping the benefits of natural resources found in space.

MaverickWhig 1 year ago

Comment removed

MaverickWhig 1 year ago

It's a shame we haven't sent anyone to the moon for so many years and still won't for another 9. Sure, technology has advanced a lot, but still, if we had kept sending people to the moon we probably would've had bases there by now and even more advanced space technology. Oh well, live and learn.

MilitaryMan68564 2 years ago

What for?If there's a reason to go then humanity will.

kostas6667 1 year ago

This has been flagged as spam show

There's a mountain of evidence that the Apollo moon missions were faked. I posted a partial summary of it on a science forum. Google "The Naked Scientists". In the "New Theories" section of the forum there's a thread entitled "Did We Land on the Moon?". The summary is on page 15. It's the 7th post from the top.

People who still think they went to the moon simply haven't seen the hoax evidence yet.

Cosmored 2 years ago

it is only a American Dream!! If it is possible !?? It is only for Super Rich Society! And we are the Loosers!!!

Peace Out Rabbit!!

purpelhazze 2 years ago

Looks like Disney World, where is commander rockefeller? time for the New Space Order, ig 250billion Euros isnt too much for this animation, the low price is cause it's economie crisis.

KongaBongaMulu 2 years ago

It's possible, but harder to do. First, the original fuel tank and boosters were designed to take them into orbit, not out, so you will need MUCH larger rockets to do the job. Plus, even if we carried the lander in the cargo bay, we would have to modify the shuttle to allow docking at the nose. After all of that, I hope we still have enough fuel in the orbiter to get back!

shigshwa 2 years ago

almost like the apollo missions.....why dont they use the shuttle, and go to the moon then deploy the lander from the cargo hold?...saves having to go back to the 60's!!!

ohsoeasy1 2 years ago

At very end - ground-lading vs sea as for Apollo? I suppose coming down hard would not make much of a difference for the crew (hard landing is a huge G force whether ground or water)

bi1iruben 2 years ago

up 2 Uranus.

fuadali16 2 years ago

I say we let the people that are going to get to land on the moon be the people that get to pay for the whole thing.

Hodson2000 2 years ago

i mean journey to the edge of the universe

tayson89 2 years ago

does any1 know what spacecraft they used to travel in the journey of the universe? did the human really get that far? or just a guess.....

tayson89 2 years ago

seriously?

graphicism 2 years ago

space shuttle is 30 years old so the shuttle will retire in 2010. remember the insident of Columbia whare it blew up in rentry, those cracks on the shuttle are getting worse and worse,

sideslide23 3 years ago

yep, its too old. The shuttle concept is fantastic, extremely versatile but a lot complicated, lots of thing can get wrong , and a hell expensive. Sorry, back to the 60s with 2000 electronics, not bad either.

samuraifugitivo 2 years ago

still looks like it will be held together with sticky tape...

bedw2144 3 years ago

Did I see this on real about 36 years ? whats new

ilsils100 3 years ago 5

idioooooooooots, read up alittle more abt it

joostack 3 years ago

2020 is way too late i guess they like to waste time in making the ares when they have the space shuttle.

mshsz 3 years ago

The space shuttle is 30 year old junk. They need replacing because they're falling apart and have a habit of randomly exploding in mid-air.

Fricasso79 3 years ago 2

Friscasso. What a stupid comment. They do not have a habit of blowing up in mid air. If you mean Challenger, and knowing you, Columbia. The orbiter was not at fault. They are NOT "falling apart" and they are even looking at extending their operations to 2015. Plus, this video is outdated. Orion's SM looks completely different now. Can't get over how stupid your comment was, nevermind how utterly disrespectful it is.

Tim733733 3 years ago

Retard.

Fricasso79 3 years ago

they cant use a space shuttle because its not built for landing they use the lander because its built for landing its would be like making a helicopter go underwater

timelordcreation 2 years ago