@obesehairydog Because of money my friend, if it was cheap and clean, oil and petrolleum companies would loose a lot of money, and if you had billions, unless you were a very good person, (wich is not the case of many billionaries) you would spend the money on oil or petrolleum ocmpanies because they would give you WAY more money.
Its just a sad fact my friend. The world moves according to money. Filthy, disgusting money.
They would prefer to wait, all the while saying, "nuclear fusion will NEVER work. It is impossible." Then, when ignition is reached and proven to be viable...they will invest a few dollars in commercializing it and make more billions...all the while, criticizing government beuracrats and scientists and talking about how "government is always the problem, never the solution". They will steal all the credit for something they had nothing to do with...they always have........
I disagree with C02 as a pollutant. Its a natural gas we breath out plants need it to live. The hockety stick is fake and has been disproven. Dont go via the glabal warming scam to get this you dont need to. Just use the science of we need it.
Of course CO2 is a pollutant. But, so is oxygen. Anything is a pollutant which dramatically changes the atmospheric composition and can alter earth's climate. In earth's early days, there was much less free-standing oxygen in the atmosphere. Bacteria colonies produced oxygen as a waste product...thereby filling the atmosphere with the oxygen that was poisonous and killed them. What makes both of these things "pollutants" in their respective time periods was the amount rel
If you don't think it is a pollutant...go breathe some of it in. What makes a "pollutant" a "pollutant"...is that it is poisonous to the organism which is releasing it. Breathing CO2 can be hazardous to your health...that is why you exhale it as a waste product...and why if you are unable to do so, you will die.
There are plenty of other reasons why increasing CO2 is polluting besides the global warming "hoax", as you put it...reasonable science as I and most educated people would put it
Further more...by your logic, there is no such thing as a "pollutant". All vapors are "natural gas". Arsenic can be found in nature; but that hardly means I should dump it in your water supply. If I did so, I would be polluting. Or would I? It is a natural element!
@obesehairydog These guys arent that amazing at all, ive already created a star the size of a basket ball. And now a planet with miniature living human life. now soon i will have a solar system and soon a planet to save earth and these cartoon making losers will be ashamed of themselves.
Meh - we already have a perfectly good source of clean fusion energy, located smack in the middle of our solar system. A fraction of the solar energy that hits our planet can power us for the foreseeable future. Man-made fusion just means more expensive centralized power controlled by energy monopolies.
• Exists already the device of production and introduction's electromagnetic field flux for the electromagnetic trap in a spherical chamber of thermonuclear combustion. See the scheme of the tomb stone from Palenque. See on You Tube: Anti-gravity Russian Helicopter. Therefore 30% from projection and experimentation to one thermonuclear reactor controllable with spherical chamber is solved.
I am correctly clear in the mode of unfolding of the thermonuclear controllable fusion by man, following and some logical and rational comunications of the spirits(spacial men), and I shall continue that present my opinion in the hope that it will find engineers and physicists which let understand logical and rational the practical unfolding of some experiments, and not the animated unfolding by dogmatic, phylosophical theory and infested with prejudices.
I had thinked a proposal of realisation to one universal vehicle, good on Earth but and in cosmos. The source of energy is a thermonuclear controlled reactor, and the traction is realized through a set of reactive electromagnetic motors. The realization of these, impose a revision and elucidation to some parts from the actual science, which is strangled of the theoretical physics with a series of metaphysical laws and principles.
The test for nuclear fusion realisation on Tokamak's installations and with LASER cannot bring anything new for the energetics' future. I bind the thermonuclear controlled reactor schedule by the Sun model , by the reactive electromagnetic motor schedule from Palenque stone's tombe. You see the my project for thermonuclear controlled reactor.
Can somebody explain to me how it is that fusion could be considered a 'clean' source of energy? A hydrogen bomb ('fusion' bomb) releases tremendous amounts of radioactivity. A fusion reactor also produces great amounts of radioactivity in the form of neutrons and/or tritium. Neutrons can pass through any solid. Over time they cause most metals to deteriorate and become brittle. What will we build containment vessels out of? How will we dispose of the highly radioactive cont. vessels after use?
@obesehairydog the reason people arent' investing in it is that many people don't think it is plausible (even if it is possible, the infrastructure to provide the planet with fusion energy might not be practical).. to them it's yet another false hope for unlimited fuel.. just like people aren't investing in solar power because of the initial investments needed, humans will continue to consume fossil fuels until they are gone, and only once we have an energy crisis will be turn to newer sources
NIF is a huge WASTE of money. it is a military project, and will never lead the way to a practical fusion power machine. All the noise about NIF producing energy is absurd marketing spin designed to sell this bloated, overpriced, overbudget military project to the public. Unfortunately, from the comments here, the public is falling for it.
How interesting to see children being educated about NIF, that I as a 62 yr old had never heard about. NIF is not a key to the media obviously. Neatly put together for a child to understand.
The Mayans did not predict the end, they predicted a new dawn for mankind and the end of an age relying on the sun from afar to an age where we embrace the sun in our arms. People should worry not.
I also don't understand how this concept is scalable. The idea alone of compressing objects with lasers somehow logically leads to a dead end for continuous power generation. Correct me if I'm way off base, but ITER or even a stellarator both seem like more efficient and pragmatic ways of going about fusion power.
Why are the majority of programs on this aimed directly grade school children or seemingly at a grade school level? I would like some physics please, not rehashing global carbon and yadda yadda.
What are the projected ratios of energy input to output? How do you get continuous output from inserting these pellets via precise robotics? Is there anything around for the scientifically-but-not-professional savvy people in an hour to 2 hour presentation on the NIF?
also, for greenhouse gases what about all the plants that "breath" CO², ... hmm... is it really that bad ? going on assumptions instead of facts....distorted truth is still a lie.
Not could but will be the future if only everyone can see the beauty of fusion. None of the current green tech stands even an inch up to what nuclear fusion as an energy source could be. Sad we wasted all that money on stupid Hydrogen fuel cells.
watch?v=k5idfQhYw6c.. World's Most Powerful Laser Unveiled
The world's most powerful laser was dedicated at the Livermore National Laboratory in California. It's designed to shore up the nation's aging nuclear weapons. (May 29)
Enough with the anthropogenic global warming. When speaking about other planets, he failed to mention how they are all warming as well. This would have been a great presentation if he just stuck to the fusion.
But isnt global warming along with depleting oil the whole reason why we are investing in fusion along with other possible energy sources? Investors arent interested in what fusion is but rather what it can do for humanity.
@jenko701 yes it is greatly exaggerated to sicking levels, however we have warmed the earth some in the past 100 years but over the 1000 years it actual has cooled more then warmed up...they always show it as the past 100 going up, when in fact we are much cooler now then 1000 years ago. but we should get away from fossil fuels anyways because it is old technology, we can do better already...geothermal, tidal, solar even and wind power can do this clean power just as renewable as fusion...
Well he has to present his ideas to a broad range of people- what do you think hes going to use Pure Science variables and equations to explain his point?
LOL-Thanks to Obama our government now owns the Biggest corporations in the world- and owns a huge stake in the auto industry- if that isnt a clear road to Fascism then i dont know what is. Thanks to Obama again, the robbery of the American people was successful in the form of The Bailouts. Obama also supports FEMA and the building NAFTA freeways connecting Mexico/USA/and Canada. Obama is trying to shove these legislations down our throats without transparency like he promised..IMPEACH!
Very informative, a great primer. Need a copy for my student. For the critics. When you attain perfection cast the first stone. Try the Joe Friday approach and focus on the facts, and let people find their own conclusions.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
English illustrates solves the invention which the Earth warms, does not use the innovation which all energies possibly generate electricity your government, must be the national person makes this innovation if you did not understand that I said anything I ask you to tell you the National intelligence Organization completes this innovation I do not spend money to give your country In you In you tude character a661333
"Almost no CO2." He's referring to the sum amount of CO2 on Mars being almost none compared to Venus, rather than the percentage of its atmosphere being made up of CO2.
@obesehairydog Because of money my friend, if it was cheap and clean, oil and petrolleum companies would loose a lot of money, and if you had billions, unless you were a very good person, (wich is not the case of many billionaries) you would spend the money on oil or petrolleum ocmpanies because they would give you WAY more money.
Its just a sad fact my friend. The world moves according to money. Filthy, disgusting money.
franzsebas2009 2 months ago
@obesehairydog
They would prefer to wait, all the while saying, "nuclear fusion will NEVER work. It is impossible." Then, when ignition is reached and proven to be viable...they will invest a few dollars in commercializing it and make more billions...all the while, criticizing government beuracrats and scientists and talking about how "government is always the problem, never the solution". They will steal all the credit for something they had nothing to do with...they always have........
MrDanP1 3 months ago
I disagree with C02 as a pollutant. Its a natural gas we breath out plants need it to live. The hockety stick is fake and has been disproven. Dont go via the glabal warming scam to get this you dont need to. Just use the science of we need it.
imnormalyournot 4 months ago
@imnormalyournot
Of course CO2 is a pollutant. But, so is oxygen. Anything is a pollutant which dramatically changes the atmospheric composition and can alter earth's climate. In earth's early days, there was much less free-standing oxygen in the atmosphere. Bacteria colonies produced oxygen as a waste product...thereby filling the atmosphere with the oxygen that was poisonous and killed them. What makes both of these things "pollutants" in their respective time periods was the amount rel
MrDanP1 3 months ago
If you don't think it is a pollutant...go breathe some of it in. What makes a "pollutant" a "pollutant"...is that it is poisonous to the organism which is releasing it. Breathing CO2 can be hazardous to your health...that is why you exhale it as a waste product...and why if you are unable to do so, you will die.
There are plenty of other reasons why increasing CO2 is polluting besides the global warming "hoax", as you put it...reasonable science as I and most educated people would put it
MrDanP1 3 months ago
Further more...by your logic, there is no such thing as a "pollutant". All vapors are "natural gas". Arsenic can be found in nature; but that hardly means I should dump it in your water supply. If I did so, I would be polluting. Or would I? It is a natural element!
MrDanP1 3 months ago
This is quite renewable once up and running... all else is NON renewable - It takes lots of windmills to build a windmill... !
imnormalyournot 4 months ago
@obesehairydog nah im just a regular dude who lives on earth and creates miniature earth and space ecosystems.
TailsBit 4 months ago
@obesehairydog These guys arent that amazing at all, ive already created a star the size of a basket ball. And now a planet with miniature living human life. now soon i will have a solar system and soon a planet to save earth and these cartoon making losers will be ashamed of themselves.
TailsBit 4 months ago
Meh - we already have a perfectly good source of clean fusion energy, located smack in the middle of our solar system. A fraction of the solar energy that hits our planet can power us for the foreseeable future. Man-made fusion just means more expensive centralized power controlled by energy monopolies.
47f0 6 months ago
SandustanBrasov
• Exists already the device of production and introduction's electromagnetic field flux for the electromagnetic trap in a spherical chamber of thermonuclear combustion. See the scheme of the tomb stone from Palenque. See on You Tube: Anti-gravity Russian Helicopter. Therefore 30% from projection and experimentation to one thermonuclear reactor controllable with spherical chamber is solved.
sandustanBrasov 7 months ago
SandustanBrasov
I am correctly clear in the mode of unfolding of the thermonuclear controllable fusion by man, following and some logical and rational comunications of the spirits(spacial men), and I shall continue that present my opinion in the hope that it will find engineers and physicists which let understand logical and rational the practical unfolding of some experiments, and not the animated unfolding by dogmatic, phylosophical theory and infested with prejudices.
sandustanBrasov 7 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
I had thinked a proposal of realisation to one universal vehicle, good on Earth but and in cosmos. The source of energy is a thermonuclear controlled reactor, and the traction is realized through a set of reactive electromagnetic motors. The realization of these, impose a revision and elucidation to some parts from the actual science, which is strangled of the theoretical physics with a series of metaphysical laws and principles.
sandustanBrasov 7 months ago
SandustanBrasov
The test for nuclear fusion realisation on Tokamak's installations and with LASER cannot bring anything new for the energetics' future. I bind the thermonuclear controlled reactor schedule by the Sun model , by the reactive electromagnetic motor schedule from Palenque stone's tombe. You see the my project for thermonuclear controlled reactor.
sandustanBrasov 7 months ago
Can somebody explain to me how it is that fusion could be considered a 'clean' source of energy? A hydrogen bomb ('fusion' bomb) releases tremendous amounts of radioactivity. A fusion reactor also produces great amounts of radioactivity in the form of neutrons and/or tritium. Neutrons can pass through any solid. Over time they cause most metals to deteriorate and become brittle. What will we build containment vessels out of? How will we dispose of the highly radioactive cont. vessels after use?
Weezot97 7 months ago
@Weezot97 You're not even wrong, so, I won't bother.
bdogshredder 6 months ago
@obesehairydog the reason people arent' investing in it is that many people don't think it is plausible (even if it is possible, the infrastructure to provide the planet with fusion energy might not be practical).. to them it's yet another false hope for unlimited fuel.. just like people aren't investing in solar power because of the initial investments needed, humans will continue to consume fossil fuels until they are gone, and only once we have an energy crisis will be turn to newer sources
shootdaj 8 months ago
this video is dated wayback 2008. its 2011 now, what happened? any success? subscribing. :-)
stgrenade64 11 months ago
NIF is a huge WASTE of money. it is a military project, and will never lead the way to a practical fusion power machine. All the noise about NIF producing energy is absurd marketing spin designed to sell this bloated, overpriced, overbudget military project to the public. Unfortunately, from the comments here, the public is falling for it.
dodanimal 11 months ago
FAKE AND GAY! son.
atc5757 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Existent Asian beautiful girls dating busizz4me.info
MoniRokse 1 year ago
@obesehairydog unfortunately the rich people of this planet prefer none renewables because it makes them more money. you dig ?
1982labman 1 year ago
How interesting to see children being educated about NIF, that I as a 62 yr old had never heard about. NIF is not a key to the media obviously. Neatly put together for a child to understand.
JohnnyRock2000 1 year ago
@obesehairydog You would probably buy a car too ;)
ThermalHD 1 year ago
thanks
cooboxlinux 1 year ago
The Mayans did not predict the end, they predicted a new dawn for mankind and the end of an age relying on the sun from afar to an age where we embrace the sun in our arms. People should worry not.
nat6660 1 year ago
I hope this project dosen't back fire. The launch date is in 2012. Oh great!!!!
schaefer39 1 year ago
@schaefer39 even better they say end of 2012...like in december? -_-
cooldude231234 1 year ago
I also don't understand how this concept is scalable. The idea alone of compressing objects with lasers somehow logically leads to a dead end for continuous power generation. Correct me if I'm way off base, but ITER or even a stellarator both seem like more efficient and pragmatic ways of going about fusion power.
miinyoo 1 year ago
Why are the majority of programs on this aimed directly grade school children or seemingly at a grade school level? I would like some physics please, not rehashing global carbon and yadda yadda.
What are the projected ratios of energy input to output? How do you get continuous output from inserting these pellets via precise robotics? Is there anything around for the scientifically-but-not-professional savvy people in an hour to 2 hour presentation on the NIF?
miinyoo 1 year ago
also, for greenhouse gases what about all the plants that "breath" CO², ... hmm... is it really that bad ? going on assumptions instead of facts....distorted truth is still a lie.
kaiyne316 1 year ago
Extreme Malarky! Marketing is not science.
mcg305 1 year ago
Pray to whaterver god you believe in that these guys make in time before we face a Richad Duncan-esque scenario.
Joel354vanfanel 2 years ago
without warmth there would be no love making. inefficiency of the human body is what makes us horny
tiptiptapable 2 years ago
He reminds me of Doctor Octavius from Spiderman 2 and he's covering the same subject. That's scary. lol
bhagans 2 years ago
Not could but will be the future if only everyone can see the beauty of fusion. None of the current green tech stands even an inch up to what nuclear fusion as an energy source could be. Sad we wasted all that money on stupid Hydrogen fuel cells.
Nebozilla 2 years ago
well... if ur rich, buying cars contributes to consumption and saves the economy and the poor
clarionxxx 2 years ago
@clarionxxx LOL
MrJihadjared 8 months ago
Interesting.
Krumbz2003 2 years ago
later this month, a tiny star will be born on Earth.coutesy of Nif, so how come california gets all the sun, great the future looks bright
crimsoncoin 2 years ago
a tiny star as in a fusion reaction right? thats not scheduled till next year at the least as stated on the site and other videos.
Nebozilla 2 years ago
watch?v=k5idfQhYw6c.. World's Most Powerful Laser Unveiled
The world's most powerful laser was dedicated at the Livermore National Laboratory in California. It's designed to shore up the nation's aging nuclear weapons. (May 29)
crimsoncoin 2 years ago
Enough with the anthropogenic global warming. When speaking about other planets, he failed to mention how they are all warming as well. This would have been a great presentation if he just stuck to the fusion.
chitch1776 2 years ago
But isnt global warming along with depleting oil the whole reason why we are investing in fusion along with other possible energy sources? Investors arent interested in what fusion is but rather what it can do for humanity.
Nebozilla 2 years ago
GW is BS
jenko701 2 years ago
@jenko701 yes it is greatly exaggerated to sicking levels, however we have warmed the earth some in the past 100 years but over the 1000 years it actual has cooled more then warmed up...they always show it as the past 100 going up, when in fact we are much cooler now then 1000 years ago. but we should get away from fossil fuels anyways because it is old technology, we can do better already...geothermal, tidal, solar even and wind power can do this clean power just as renewable as fusion...
kaiyne316 1 year ago
Where are the captions? I was told that in NC all video needed to be captioned. I rely on them....
TENSBUDE 2 years ago 2
The French Laser Mega joule Facility is about the same machine. It`s finished in 2010 and will have 240 lasers compared to the 192 of this NIF.
Dutchdrummer99 2 years ago 2
*****
ubuibiok 2 years ago
Comment removed
desirestar86 2 years ago
Comment removed
illmagnified 2 years ago
Comment removed
desirestar86 2 years ago
LOLO- ur so lucky ur my girl...UR NEVER GETTING ANY MORE PRESENTS FROM ME EVER!
illmagnified 2 years ago
The way he's talking to the audience it's like they're all about 10.
B7Scorpio 2 years ago 2
Well he has to present his ideas to a broad range of people- what do you think hes going to use Pure Science variables and equations to explain his point?
illmagnified 2 years ago
Comment removed
desirestar86 2 years ago
Comment removed
desirestar86 2 years ago
LOL-Thanks to Obama our government now owns the Biggest corporations in the world- and owns a huge stake in the auto industry- if that isnt a clear road to Fascism then i dont know what is. Thanks to Obama again, the robbery of the American people was successful in the form of The Bailouts. Obama also supports FEMA and the building NAFTA freeways connecting Mexico/USA/and Canada. Obama is trying to shove these legislations down our throats without transparency like he promised..IMPEACH!
illmagnified 2 years ago
what i just read sounded like a mentally challenged person who jerks off to porn 80 times a day
desirestar86 2 years ago
Dont listen to Desirestar86- she doesnt know what shes talking about- she just wants my dick thats all- and im gonna give it to her tonite!
illmagnified 2 years ago
Obama cant wait to gas whitey!!!
...
DakaSha 2 years ago
Very informative, a great primer. Need a copy for my student. For the critics. When you attain perfection cast the first stone. Try the Joe Friday approach and focus on the facts, and let people find their own conclusions.
MusicVOT 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
English illustrates solves the invention which the Earth warms, does not use the innovation which all energies possibly generate electricity your government, must be the national person makes this innovation if you did not understand that I said anything I ask you to tell you the National intelligence Organization completes this innovation I do not spend money to give your country In you In you tude character a661333
a661333 3 years ago
dear god,... this guy isn't he ashamed,...
supposed to be scientis and says there's no
CO2 on mars - ther's 95% of it in the atmosphere, there.
(buy a gun and kill yourself w/ a rock :)
mijanvar 3 years ago
"Almost no CO2." He's referring to the sum amount of CO2 on Mars being almost none compared to Venus, rather than the percentage of its atmosphere being made up of CO2.
mydizzle90210 3 years ago
interesting theme, but the guy is so boooring,..god!!!
mijanvar 3 years ago 2
Wow 58 minutes, too much for me, but good video.
TheCat86 3 years ago 2
Really well done. Learned some real science.
rjfarns 3 years ago
most most excellent. thank you for posting.
10mintwo 3 years ago