"NAMBLA considers itself a homosexual organization..." Well the KKK considers itself a christian organization, Islam says its the religion of peace, and like the video mentioned, conservapedia thinks it's a trustworthy site. Come up with better arguments, Andy.
I assume no studies are cited for these claims & statistics, eh? Or bad ones? Wow, these "stats" reminds me of Ted Haggard's similar claim that evangelical Christians have the best sex lives. Uh huh. Counting his, of course....
« Be happy with who you are » ? Then, if one is alcoholic & a public masturbator, it's OK, he should go along with it ? I'm not saying homosexuality is equivalent to those other "activities", it's just to point out how weak & stupid the argument is. Nowadays an incredible number of people are treated for alledged mental disorders, for behaviours which are perfectly explainable within their respective context, or which could be accepted as part of human diversity. How is homosexuality different ?
Alcoholism and jacking off in public are NOT the same as being born a certain way. You need to look at your own argument before you try telling others that their arguments are weak.
look,im no christian biggot or any other of the 'stereotypes' ppl use to silence the homosexual /moral debate - but if a pedophile tends towards young boys is he a homosexual ? or is he a homosexual pedophile?
@real1abcda Funny, whenever someone starts a sentence with "I'm no bigot/racist/sexist, but..." you know very well that they *are* what they deny.
To address your point, if a male pedophile is attracted to little boys then he's also homosexual, but if he's attracted to little girls then he's heterosexual. That doesn't mean ALL homosexuals, or ALL heterosexuals are also pedophiles. Most gay and straight men are revolted by the idea of pedophilia.
@real1abcda First, denying an attribute before making your claim doesn't support that you aren't the attribute. Bill Clinton is evidence enough of that.
Second, pedophiles of a specific gender don't "tend towards young boys" any more than non-pedophiles of the same gender tend towards men.
Third, you may be homosexual or heterosexual but being one of those does NOT mean you are a pedophile. To parallel: you may be a man or woman but being one of those does NOT mean you are a pedophile.
@onijester56 you said 'Second, pedophiles of a specific gender don't "tend towards young boys" any more than non-pedophiles of the same gender tend towards men.'
absolutely correct. i had an experience with one pedophile who went after boys AND girls, and an experience with a pedophile who only went after girls (who also thought gays should be shot). they're PEDOphiles because they like prepubescent children, and prepubescence is analogous to androgynous. pederasts are more gender-focused.
top ten searches on conservapedia: Main Page [1,906,729] Homosexuality [1,572,713] Homosexuality and Hepatitis [517,086] Homosexuality and Promiscuity [420,687] Gay Bowel Syndrome [389,052] Homosexuality and Parasites [388,123] Homosexuality and Domestic Violence [365,888] Homosexuality and Gonorrhea [331,553] Homosexuality and Mental Health [291,179] Homosexuality and Syphilis [265,322
Conservatives are comfortable with people who are the way they are, and sometimes one must leave reason behind and go by the way they feel---which means that communicating their comfort will have to evade the blocky constraints of ... blah-blah-blah
@TheAnthrochocobo - This is the internet. Nuances that indicate emotion aren't present. How is anyone supposed to know that you're joking?
And people have a right for their body to be done with what they wish, within reason, i.e. if they want to get cremated, buried, etc. If for some reason they wanted to be eaten, that would be their choice.
@TheAnthrochocobo - What else would happen to them? And besides, even if the victim wasn't murdered but just found dead, they still have no choice in the matter of being eaten. That you insist upon trying to compare cannibalism and homosexuality is just vile.
@TheAnthrochocobo - You missed a step. The victims of cannibalism aren't just dead, they were killed. Murder strips someone of their right to live, and as such, it does infringe upon rights. Cannibalism is therefore not comparable to homosexuality.
Its incredible just how little the people writing this page must know about homosexuality. Its not something you can ever "fix" as it is genetic (i do not mean that any 1 single gene causes it, there are many different genes that contribute to a persons sexual orientation) The people who managed to "overcome" homosexuality, were probably only ever bisexual in the first place and have forced themselves to suppress the gay part of their libido ( which is psychologically unhealthy)
In much the same way that bars rehabilitate alcoholics. If you really think that homosexual sex is not rife in prison then you're living on another planet.
"The freedom of individuals to associate as an end in itself or with a view to pursuing common projects, e.g. through churches, trade unions, political parties, and sporting clubs." -answers.com political dictionary
Article 20 of the U.N. Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) states: 1. Everyone has the right to freedom of peaceful assembly and association. 2. No one may be compelled to belong to an association.
wait those wackos on conservapedia have any real influence? i just read it for some comedy. honestly i dont get how people have such hate for us. theyre just a bunch of hating crackpots and thats all!
I cannot get enough of conservapedia-critism and your videos are by far the best. In the possible exclusion of those who actually feature Andy himself as he is bar far more hilarious than any parody, satire or criticism can display him as.
Side note I personally have nothing against rly anyone... I'm just not a fan of the... ever so loud homosexual people who have to feel the need to kind of explode with their beliefs when ever questions are raised. Most hetero people I know feel the gay pride parade is random. I mean their is no pride in it anymore, if your acting silly with all those... leather clothes it's just a bit.... confusing, as people see that and they think all gays are like that all the time (which i assume they dont).
@joemama114 I would encourage you to have a little more empathy and understanding as to why they feel the "need to kind of explode with their beliefs".
@AestusL4 I don't need any moar "empathy" I don't know how those people feel and don't ever feel I would want to. I don't care what any person does on their own time sort of "behind closed doors" so to speak (just don't break any laws plz har har). Not in the sense of feeling the need to hide what you are doing in any way but... it's sort of that kind of thing that people should be somewhat self conscious about right?
@joemama114 self conscious is sort of an understatement when speaking of those who are loud. They are loud because they're lashing out against a society that repeatedly marginalizes. It's not just about what's in the bedroom, but also how we can't hold hands in public without fear of being attacked in some way. And the constant berating that our love is disgusting. That's why I ask you for empathy in your thoughts against those who are standing up for themselves.
@AestusL4 Sure everyone should feel safe in their own choices and that I do concede that a heck of a lot of "anti-homosexuality" supporters appear unnecessarily violent. That being said it appears that I'm not allowed to say "I think homosexuality is wrong" without getting lectured why I have to be tolerant. The fact is I am very tolerant, yet I still have my own views and don't think I should have to change to fit your lifestyle just because homosexuals feel prosecuted.
@joemama114 Oh wow... I was under the impression that you didn't think homosexuality was wrong. I can now understand why you aren't able to have empathy for us. You can believe what you will, all I ask then is that you don't proselytize discrimination against us. And please note that we don't "feel prosecuted". We are unequivocally persecuted. Despite the massive leaps forward in human rights laws, there is still much persecution against us.
@AestusL4 I don't have any pressing matter against homosexuality yet WTF I'm now not allowed to say "that's wrong/creepy/confusing/{insert any negative yet STILL RESPECTFUL comment here} without being called on it, if the mood just happens to strike me. Well that's lame... now I'm having to sensor myself just because it is now "intolerant" of your sexual orientation.
@AestusL4 I mean if some random stranger called me cockface I'd just assume he was a jerk and continue my merry day. Yet if he calls me a fag (or any other unkind homosexual term) then I JUST ASSUME HE WAS A JERK CONTINUE ON MY MERRY DAY! Yet If he were to say such things to someone who happens to be homosexual well then that's a hate crime, just silly. All of society doesn't tip toe around other lifestyles (either chosen or not) so why act that way in regards to homosexuality...?
@joemama114 Well, I don't know where you live or the laws in your area, but generally speaking simply calling someone a fag is not a hate crime. And you have every right to say that it's wrong/creepy/confusing. But you don't have a right to expect the other person to just ignore that comment and continue on their merry day. Especially when such comments ruin that persons merry day.
@joemama114 It's a little ridiculous to want to say a negative comment about someone and not want to be called out on it. If I called you an ignorant bigot I would fully expect you to defend yourself. If you call me a creepy fagot you should not be surprised or offended when I defend myself.
@AestusL4 No! Not being called out on the actual insult, I'd more or less expect that, but being told "You can't say fag and mean something insulting!" "That's being intolerant of anyone who is homosexual!" It's sort of being intolerant of me. Me a heterosexual man, I FAIL to grasp how homosexuality makes any sense to those who are. I would compare it to cannibalism, which also makes 0 sense to me but then I would probably be told you can't compare those 2 things? INTOLERANCE!
@AestusL4 If something makes 0 sense to me why am I not allowed to make light of it or degrade it, nearly everybody insults politicians because they don't agree with or just don't understand their plans. The way I feel about homosexuality is similar, It makes no sense in my mind, and has no attraction whatsoever so... I use it as an insult... because to me... it makes no sense or, it is nonsense.
@joemama114 Because that's the definition of bigotry. Holding you opinions regardless of rational discourse or evidence to the contrary. Don't you think heterosexuality is just as disgusting to homosexual people as vice-versa? It is to me. But I don't degrade a person because of their natural sexuality, as I recognize that a person is much more than a "fag" "breeder" "cracker" or "nigger". You have the right to use such words, but they are hate words.
@joemama114 You don't need to understand why such words are bad, just that their usage as an insult carries much more harm then just the harm you wish to convey. You are conveying that all "fags" are second class people, disgusting and that no one should be one. That is the message you are sending to the people who hear it. That is what we hear when you call your buddy a fag. Tolerate your hate for what you don't understand? I don't think so!
@joemama114 - Just because something makes no sense to you, that's no excuse to insult it. When you don't understand, that's your cue to learn; to explore; to discover with an open mind, and not treat homosexuals horribly because you don't understand how they can like the same gender. If you're not so hot at physics, then you shouldn't berate physicists without cause. Ditto homosexuality.
@FibonaziProductions I don't act in any way unfair to homosexual people but hey I'm an individual too and to be honest I'm uncomfortable with homosexuality and that's alright I don't let it define me or play a major role in my choices it's just something I have an aversion to. Just like a homosexual person does not define themselves by their sexual preference and sexuality does not have implicit motives in all their decisions. I have the right to be offended by 2 guys or 2 girls together.
@joemama114 - You can be offended, sure, but it's what you do with that that makes the difference. If you treat homosexual people just as you would heterosexual people: equally, then there's really no problem. It's when you start actively discriminating against homosexuals that people start getting annoyed. All a human being can ever ask for is equality among human beings unless they haven't earned it.
@FibonaziProductions I have no right meddling with are the actions of any homosexual person, their safety, their personal goals and aspirations, their privacy. I am truly appalled when I see other people acting unfairly have on more than one occasion been the voice of reason in conflicts at my school. But when I get clumped in with the jackasses who are are bigots and prejudicial just because I am not comfortable with a homosexual relationship I don't like that feeling, it feels just unfair.
All just terrific, I think I might have just laughed so hard my eardrums burst...as for NAMBLA.. *sigh* those people....*SIGH!* I mean yes freedom, liberty and all that fun bull sht but I mean COME ON! RLY!? I got say that's probably the most concerning thing I've ever heard. That we have some full grown pedophiles not only having collective meetings but also trying to make their perversion legal. I mean you got to come to a point where you just KNOW what you are doing is wrong right???
There are rational people who will see CP's words as true simply because if they don't fall in line and agree with it then their social lives basically evaporate. I live in this region of the country and trust me on this. moderates, and liberals are a minority in the bible belt. they're secluded to the cities where civilization thrives. homosexuals from communities that are conservative do have psychological problems, but not for being gay, but for being in a hateful environment.
There's no point ragging on Conservapedia, no one intelligent enough to use the internet reads, or supports anything from Conservapedia. All of us already know Conservapedia is biased.
Conservatives like to show that all homosexuals are pedophiles. When I watch those "To Catch A Predator" shows there are usually a few guys trying to hook up with young boys, but most of them are trying to hook up with underage girls.
LOL @ "the homosexual aganda" If you put it like that it almost seems like its a religious group. What with all the indoctrination of younsters and limiting free speech.
I guess it will be a matter of time before we bust this guy in a motel room with a gay prostitute and some crystal meth like so many other conservative pundits.
You know, I think Andy Schlafly is probably a closet homosexual.
Seriously, 9 out of the 10 most viewed articles on Conservapedia are about homosexuality, he constantly tries to say he's against homosexuality when on TV and he's incredibly defensive when discussing homosexuality in the talk pages.
Or, alternatively, he's a jealous bigot.
Now, we just need someone brave enough to sing him "if you were gay" from avenue Q.
I go to Conservapedia occassionally, mostly because I have an interest in abnormal psychology. I have only had two classes on the aforementioned subject but these people do seem to fall into the category, they believe in conspiracies from liberals, and start their own conspiracies against liberals. It's very interesting to just sit down and read some of their delusional beliefs.
P.S. I'm not condoning their actions or beliefs, I'm just a gay guy who's amazed at how they think.
People need to analyze their one self's indentify for who they are... If they are happy to be single, go for it.. If they are happy being homosexuality, go for it.. Never mix others with "force"
See the video "Philosophy of Liberty" that explain about "force" that will put in danger. Only respect one's self for who they are with no force!
Actually it was indeed a forgery, shown to students and guess was most fell into the trap. Showing off yet again you can teach children everything..they take it as if you tell the truth[tm]
Okay, I have to post a comment if only to offset the fallacious bile in the first comment.
Good video, mate. Of course Conservapedia is idiotic, but it's still interesting to see just how crazy they are. Thanks for giving us a glimpse into the "rationale" of the type of person who would bother referencing Conservapedia in the first place.
You have a sick mind, urging people to do what 'makes them happy'. Should cannibals be allowed to do what makes them happy? Of course not.
You can check on the stats, and find them verified by reports of the Department of Health.
Homosexuals should only be put into prison awaiting trial. Upon conviction, they should be put to death, just as murderers, rapists, and pedophiles( nambla marched in homosexual parades in the 80's ).
I don't recall telling anyone to do what "makes them happy", could you please point out where I did? Additionally, I can't find any research done recently that concludes that gay sex is the origin of AIDs, or that homosexuals want to destroy free speech.
As for your comments about NAMBLA, perhaps they did march in parades, however what does that prove? That's like saying "Hitler had a moustache, therefor all moustaches cause genocide".
Think the reference was "be happy with who you are". There is nothing wrong with being happy with being homosexual, because it doesn't harm people like cannibalism does. Then again, maybe I'm deluded. I haven't read Conservapedia's trusworthy article on homosexuality.
Right you are. Wingnuts are usually quick to pull out the cannibalism argument. What they don't seem to realize (or, more likely, refuse to accept) is that cannabilism is an action, whereas homosexuality is more of a trait.
Sure, there are... certain actions involved in homosexuality, but where's the harm in them? Conservapedia makes a failed attempt to portray them as harmful, and I certainly recommend you have a browse through the article, it's rather good for a chuckle.
1:30 …
I'm done, I'm tappin' out. That's about as much bullshit as I can take today. You guys have fun, I'm goin' home.
00D00 4 months ago
"NAMBLA considers itself a homosexual organization..." Well the KKK considers itself a christian organization, Islam says its the religion of peace, and like the video mentioned, conservapedia thinks it's a trustworthy site. Come up with better arguments, Andy.
codeythesilent 5 months ago
I assume no studies are cited for these claims & statistics, eh? Or bad ones? Wow, these "stats" reminds me of Ted Haggard's similar claim that evangelical Christians have the best sex lives. Uh huh. Counting his, of course....
LexeconKiddo 5 months ago
Great video! But am I the only one without sound?
WanderingTaoist101 6 months ago
« Be happy with who you are » ? Then, if one is alcoholic & a public masturbator, it's OK, he should go along with it ? I'm not saying homosexuality is equivalent to those other "activities", it's just to point out how weak & stupid the argument is. Nowadays an incredible number of people are treated for alledged mental disorders, for behaviours which are perfectly explainable within their respective context, or which could be accepted as part of human diversity. How is homosexuality different ?
idiosyncrazy1980 7 months ago
@idiosyncrazy1980 It's not a crime to be an alcoholic, and I doubt that anyone is really happy about being one.
sinbysin666 7 months ago
@idiosyncrazy1980
Alcoholism and jacking off in public are NOT the same as being born a certain way. You need to look at your own argument before you try telling others that their arguments are weak.
codeythesilent 5 months ago
look,im no christian biggot or any other of the 'stereotypes' ppl use to silence the homosexual /moral debate - but if a pedophile tends towards young boys is he a homosexual ? or is he a homosexual pedophile?
real1abcda 11 months ago
@real1abcda Funny, whenever someone starts a sentence with "I'm no bigot/racist/sexist, but..." you know very well that they *are* what they deny.
To address your point, if a male pedophile is attracted to little boys then he's also homosexual, but if he's attracted to little girls then he's heterosexual. That doesn't mean ALL homosexuals, or ALL heterosexuals are also pedophiles. Most gay and straight men are revolted by the idea of pedophilia.
mandolinic 11 months ago
@real1abcda First, denying an attribute before making your claim doesn't support that you aren't the attribute. Bill Clinton is evidence enough of that.
Second, pedophiles of a specific gender don't "tend towards young boys" any more than non-pedophiles of the same gender tend towards men.
Third, you may be homosexual or heterosexual but being one of those does NOT mean you are a pedophile. To parallel: you may be a man or woman but being one of those does NOT mean you are a pedophile.
onijester56 9 months ago
@onijester56 you said 'Second, pedophiles of a specific gender don't "tend towards young boys" any more than non-pedophiles of the same gender tend towards men.'
absolutely correct. i had an experience with one pedophile who went after boys AND girls, and an experience with a pedophile who only went after girls (who also thought gays should be shot). they're PEDOphiles because they like prepubescent children, and prepubescence is analogous to androgynous. pederasts are more gender-focused.
GodsArePeopleToo 9 months ago 2
FlyinSpaghettiMnstr7 1 year ago
Conservatives are comfortable with people who are the way they are, and sometimes one must leave reason behind and go by the way they feel---which means that communicating their comfort will have to evade the blocky constraints of ... blah-blah-blah
mythmanjay 1 year ago
Am I the only person who can't get onto Conservapedia at the moment? I need my daily joke!
MeBeMat 1 year ago
Disclaimer, lol.
fanofthemusic1090 1 year ago
I heard you had to be a practising Homosexual to get a job with Conservapedia.
TheTomtompiper 1 year ago
i can proudly say that im bisexual and am a perfectly normal and healthy person
evb4mvp 1 year ago
Thanks, it was an interesting article I read it. Though most everything in there is common knowledge so it wasn't really worth my time.
MichaelMantion 1 year ago
@TheAnthrochocobo - This is the internet. Nuances that indicate emotion aren't present. How is anyone supposed to know that you're joking?
And people have a right for their body to be done with what they wish, within reason, i.e. if they want to get cremated, buried, etc. If for some reason they wanted to be eaten, that would be their choice.
FibonaziProductions 1 year ago
@TheAnthrochocobo - What else would happen to them? And besides, even if the victim wasn't murdered but just found dead, they still have no choice in the matter of being eaten. That you insist upon trying to compare cannibalism and homosexuality is just vile.
FibonaziProductions 1 year ago
@TheAnthrochocobo - You missed a step. The victims of cannibalism aren't just dead, they were killed. Murder strips someone of their right to live, and as such, it does infringe upon rights. Cannibalism is therefore not comparable to homosexuality.
FibonaziProductions 1 year ago
@TheAnthrochocobo - And what negative effects does homosexuality have on society, exactly? Does it infringe upon anyone elses rights?
FibonaziProductions 1 year ago
Its incredible just how little the people writing this page must know about homosexuality. Its not something you can ever "fix" as it is genetic (i do not mean that any 1 single gene causes it, there are many different genes that contribute to a persons sexual orientation) The people who managed to "overcome" homosexuality, were probably only ever bisexual in the first place and have forced themselves to suppress the gay part of their libido ( which is psychologically unhealthy)
Computernerd545 1 year ago
Prison really does rehabilitate homosexual behavior.
InKa4484 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@InKa4484 "Prison really does rehabilitate homosexual behavior."
In much the same way that bars rehabilitate alcoholics. If you really think that homosexual sex is not rife in prison then you're living on another planet.
mandolinic 11 months ago
Two men loving each other is similar to slavery somehow. Explain later, just trust me.
Catrambi 1 year ago
I like your spin on "freedom of association."
"The freedom of individuals to associate as an end in itself or with a view to pursuing common projects, e.g. through churches, trade unions, political parties, and sporting clubs." -answers.com political dictionary
Article 20 of the U.N. Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) states: 1. Everyone has the right to freedom of peaceful assembly and association. 2. No one may be compelled to belong to an association.
tifforo1 1 year ago
when i saw the part "conservapedia and the homosexual agenda" i had to re-read the title header to make sure it does'nt say "what does relgion do"
Zralf 1 year ago
wait those wackos on conservapedia have any real influence? i just read it for some comedy. honestly i dont get how people have such hate for us. theyre just a bunch of hating crackpots and thats all!
evb4mvp 1 year ago
I cannot get enough of conservapedia-critism and your videos are by far the best. In the possible exclusion of those who actually feature Andy himself as he is bar far more hilarious than any parody, satire or criticism can display him as.
Keep up the good work!
CarlMinez 1 year ago
Side note I personally have nothing against rly anyone... I'm just not a fan of the... ever so loud homosexual people who have to feel the need to kind of explode with their beliefs when ever questions are raised. Most hetero people I know feel the gay pride parade is random. I mean their is no pride in it anymore, if your acting silly with all those... leather clothes it's just a bit.... confusing, as people see that and they think all gays are like that all the time (which i assume they dont).
joemama114 1 year ago
@joemama114 I would encourage you to have a little more empathy and understanding as to why they feel the "need to kind of explode with their beliefs".
AestusL4 1 year ago
@AestusL4 I don't need any moar "empathy" I don't know how those people feel and don't ever feel I would want to. I don't care what any person does on their own time sort of "behind closed doors" so to speak (just don't break any laws plz har har). Not in the sense of feeling the need to hide what you are doing in any way but... it's sort of that kind of thing that people should be somewhat self conscious about right?
joemama114 1 year ago
@joemama114 self conscious is sort of an understatement when speaking of those who are loud. They are loud because they're lashing out against a society that repeatedly marginalizes. It's not just about what's in the bedroom, but also how we can't hold hands in public without fear of being attacked in some way. And the constant berating that our love is disgusting. That's why I ask you for empathy in your thoughts against those who are standing up for themselves.
AestusL4 1 year ago
@AestusL4 Sure everyone should feel safe in their own choices and that I do concede that a heck of a lot of "anti-homosexuality" supporters appear unnecessarily violent. That being said it appears that I'm not allowed to say "I think homosexuality is wrong" without getting lectured why I have to be tolerant. The fact is I am very tolerant, yet I still have my own views and don't think I should have to change to fit your lifestyle just because homosexuals feel prosecuted.
joemama114 1 year ago
@joemama114 Oh wow... I was under the impression that you didn't think homosexuality was wrong. I can now understand why you aren't able to have empathy for us. You can believe what you will, all I ask then is that you don't proselytize discrimination against us. And please note that we don't "feel prosecuted". We are unequivocally persecuted. Despite the massive leaps forward in human rights laws, there is still much persecution against us.
AestusL4 1 year ago
@AestusL4 I don't have any pressing matter against homosexuality yet WTF I'm now not allowed to say "that's wrong/creepy/confusing/{insert any negative yet STILL RESPECTFUL comment here} without being called on it, if the mood just happens to strike me. Well that's lame... now I'm having to sensor myself just because it is now "intolerant" of your sexual orientation.
joemama114 1 year ago
@AestusL4 I mean if some random stranger called me cockface I'd just assume he was a jerk and continue my merry day. Yet if he calls me a fag (or any other unkind homosexual term) then I JUST ASSUME HE WAS A JERK CONTINUE ON MY MERRY DAY! Yet If he were to say such things to someone who happens to be homosexual well then that's a hate crime, just silly. All of society doesn't tip toe around other lifestyles (either chosen or not) so why act that way in regards to homosexuality...?
joemama114 1 year ago
@joemama114 Well, I don't know where you live or the laws in your area, but generally speaking simply calling someone a fag is not a hate crime. And you have every right to say that it's wrong/creepy/confusing. But you don't have a right to expect the other person to just ignore that comment and continue on their merry day. Especially when such comments ruin that persons merry day.
AestusL4 1 year ago
@joemama114 It's a little ridiculous to want to say a negative comment about someone and not want to be called out on it. If I called you an ignorant bigot I would fully expect you to defend yourself. If you call me a creepy fagot you should not be surprised or offended when I defend myself.
AestusL4 1 year ago
@AestusL4 No! Not being called out on the actual insult, I'd more or less expect that, but being told "You can't say fag and mean something insulting!" "That's being intolerant of anyone who is homosexual!" It's sort of being intolerant of me. Me a heterosexual man, I FAIL to grasp how homosexuality makes any sense to those who are. I would compare it to cannibalism, which also makes 0 sense to me but then I would probably be told you can't compare those 2 things? INTOLERANCE!
joemama114 1 year ago
@AestusL4 If something makes 0 sense to me why am I not allowed to make light of it or degrade it, nearly everybody insults politicians because they don't agree with or just don't understand their plans. The way I feel about homosexuality is similar, It makes no sense in my mind, and has no attraction whatsoever so... I use it as an insult... because to me... it makes no sense or, it is nonsense.
joemama114 1 year ago
@joemama114 Because that's the definition of bigotry. Holding you opinions regardless of rational discourse or evidence to the contrary. Don't you think heterosexuality is just as disgusting to homosexual people as vice-versa? It is to me. But I don't degrade a person because of their natural sexuality, as I recognize that a person is much more than a "fag" "breeder" "cracker" or "nigger". You have the right to use such words, but they are hate words.
AestusL4 1 year ago
@joemama114 You don't need to understand why such words are bad, just that their usage as an insult carries much more harm then just the harm you wish to convey. You are conveying that all "fags" are second class people, disgusting and that no one should be one. That is the message you are sending to the people who hear it. That is what we hear when you call your buddy a fag. Tolerate your hate for what you don't understand? I don't think so!
AestusL4 1 year ago
@joemama114 - Just because something makes no sense to you, that's no excuse to insult it. When you don't understand, that's your cue to learn; to explore; to discover with an open mind, and not treat homosexuals horribly because you don't understand how they can like the same gender. If you're not so hot at physics, then you shouldn't berate physicists without cause. Ditto homosexuality.
FibonaziProductions 1 year ago
@FibonaziProductions I don't act in any way unfair to homosexual people but hey I'm an individual too and to be honest I'm uncomfortable with homosexuality and that's alright I don't let it define me or play a major role in my choices it's just something I have an aversion to. Just like a homosexual person does not define themselves by their sexual preference and sexuality does not have implicit motives in all their decisions. I have the right to be offended by 2 guys or 2 girls together.
joemama114 1 year ago
@joemama114 - You can be offended, sure, but it's what you do with that that makes the difference. If you treat homosexual people just as you would heterosexual people: equally, then there's really no problem. It's when you start actively discriminating against homosexuals that people start getting annoyed. All a human being can ever ask for is equality among human beings unless they haven't earned it.
FibonaziProductions 1 year ago
@FibonaziProductions I have no right meddling with are the actions of any homosexual person, their safety, their personal goals and aspirations, their privacy. I am truly appalled when I see other people acting unfairly have on more than one occasion been the voice of reason in conflicts at my school. But when I get clumped in with the jackasses who are are bigots and prejudicial just because I am not comfortable with a homosexual relationship I don't like that feeling, it feels just unfair.
joemama114 1 year ago
All just terrific, I think I might have just laughed so hard my eardrums burst...as for NAMBLA.. *sigh* those people....*SIGH!* I mean yes freedom, liberty and all that fun bull sht but I mean COME ON! RLY!? I got say that's probably the most concerning thing I've ever heard. That we have some full grown pedophiles not only having collective meetings but also trying to make their perversion legal. I mean you got to come to a point where you just KNOW what you are doing is wrong right???
joemama114 1 year ago
Andy Schlafly was one of my first lovers. Don't know why he's doing this to us all of a sudden. :(
HardforJesus 1 year ago
Why should I trust you? Oooohhhh.....
Highlyskeptical 1 year ago
Conservapedia is pro slavery. LOL
DoomNoMore 1 year ago
The irony of conservatives using the word freedom is palpable.
needparalegal 1 year ago
1:37 ....distorting Science, DISTORTING SCIENCE?!?!
from CONSERVAPEDIA!?!?!?!
wowplayer6541011 1 year ago
hateapedia, for people who cant stand that the majority of the world doesnt hate gays as much as they do and dont understand why.
i dont understand how they can say such misleading things. if your right the turth should be enough.
91jgphonecall 1 year ago
lol "I shit you not."
I like you, Greatatheismo
sandform 1 year ago
You know, the slogan: "Conservapedia, an unbiost inciclapidia (Don't know how to spell that)" I think it's true... IF YOU RETARDED.
dave19941000 1 year ago
wow so this "truth" website goes completely against science and the major mental health organization of the USA and europe? wow
RavenBlaze 1 year ago
Does conservapedia talk about Darwin and Hitler having a homosexual affair? It might as well.
Seriously, this fucking website is a pathetic joke.
bigfilmhat 1 year ago
"homosexual couples have significantly higher incidences of violent behavior...."
....being focused at them by wingnuts.
Spiderzumbie 1 year ago
There are rational people who will see CP's words as true simply because if they don't fall in line and agree with it then their social lives basically evaporate. I live in this region of the country and trust me on this. moderates, and liberals are a minority in the bible belt. they're secluded to the cities where civilization thrives. homosexuals from communities that are conservative do have psychological problems, but not for being gay, but for being in a hateful environment.
lordblazer 1 year ago
There's no point ragging on Conservapedia, no one intelligent enough to use the internet reads, or supports anything from Conservapedia. All of us already know Conservapedia is biased.
Jarut195 1 year ago
@Jarut195 Biased is putting it mildly.
mikeyman211 1 year ago
hahaha. and pls dont use the word retards, since those nice peoke would not want to be associated with conservapedia
Ko252 2 years ago
I agree with this video, but I must say I admire anyone who is able to add the word 'pontificating' into their videos. XD
knifewrenchowns 2 years ago
The homosexual agenda... is like slavery.
There's a fucking dent in my floor where my jaw just hit it.
kufr72 2 years ago 7
Conservapedia fails...epically.
Proudtobeacommie 2 years ago
And you shouldnt be so hard on conservatives its not a choice they were born that way and its not our place to judge them
moonpie50 2 years ago
@moonpie
Being born in certain conditions is not an excuse.
It's always time to get a brain.
hunchbacked 2 years ago
true that
moonpie50 2 years ago
Conservatives like to show that all homosexuals are pedophiles. When I watch those "To Catch A Predator" shows there are usually a few guys trying to hook up with young boys, but most of them are trying to hook up with underage girls.
JONATHAN1984ATHEIST 2 years ago
LOL @ "the homosexual aganda" If you put it like that it almost seems like its a religious group. What with all the indoctrination of younsters and limiting free speech.
acvossius 2 years ago
Most people in NAMBLA are probably conservatives.....
nightmathzombieethan 2 years ago
The far right believe in the boogeyman. The boogeyman takes on many forms. He is very scary to them.
yourliver1 2 years ago
It's funny. You can catch the gay?
Indoctrinate kids into being gay?
The bible indoctrinated this guy into ... Holy crap.
I don't even have enough characters to type it all.
nosferotica1 2 years ago
Man, I caught a bad case of gay last week, but I walked that shit off and went to work....LIKE A FUCKIN MAN!!!!
guninthewater 2 years ago 3
@guninthewater
I guess it will be a matter of time before we bust this guy in a motel room with a gay prostitute and some crystal meth like so many other conservative pundits.
nosferotica1 2 years ago
I facestabbed myself watching this..
Wow..
Khaosispower 2 years ago
Even Wikipedia is more trustworthy than this!
Yoshiisland1 2 years ago
Conservapedia: where smart people go to laugh
OR
Conservapedia: Where you go when you want to give your brain a break
OR
Conservapedia: where intelgence goes to die
theclash06013 2 years ago 39
LOL. Too true.
Man, this video really did make me lose what little faith I had in humanity. Where's a knife?
Khaosispower 2 years ago 3
You know, I think Andy Schlafly is probably a closet homosexual.
Seriously, 9 out of the 10 most viewed articles on Conservapedia are about homosexuality, he constantly tries to say he's against homosexuality when on TV and he's incredibly defensive when discussing homosexuality in the talk pages.
Or, alternatively, he's a jealous bigot.
Now, we just need someone brave enough to sing him "if you were gay" from avenue Q.
Teridax68 2 years ago 25
@Teridax68 - If you were gay...
That'd be okay...
Coz I mean hey!
I'd like you anyway...
YAY FOR AVENUE Q
FibonaziProductions 1 year ago
I go to Conservapedia occassionally, mostly because I have an interest in abnormal psychology. I have only had two classes on the aforementioned subject but these people do seem to fall into the category, they believe in conspiracies from liberals, and start their own conspiracies against liberals. It's very interesting to just sit down and read some of their delusional beliefs.
P.S. I'm not condoning their actions or beliefs, I'm just a gay guy who's amazed at how they think.
marxphoenix 2 years ago 4
People need to analyze their one self's indentify for who they are... If they are happy to be single, go for it.. If they are happy being homosexuality, go for it.. Never mix others with "force"
See the video "Philosophy of Liberty" that explain about "force" that will put in danger. Only respect one's self for who they are with no force!
SunHearts65 2 years ago 3
I wish conservapedia would understand that most people actually don't take them seriously.
DarkForces99 2 years ago 5
What is the Pacific Northwest Tree Squid then not real? I just wanted to mount a research into that..hicking to their breeding fields.
masticina 2 years ago
From what I've read, Assfly wanted it to make fun of environmentalism.
DarkForces99 2 years ago
Actually it was indeed a forgery, shown to students and guess was most fell into the trap. Showing off yet again you can teach children everything..they take it as if you tell the truth[tm]
masticina 2 years ago
Okay, I have to post a comment if only to offset the fallacious bile in the first comment.
Good video, mate. Of course Conservapedia is idiotic, but it's still interesting to see just how crazy they are. Thanks for giving us a glimpse into the "rationale" of the type of person who would bother referencing Conservapedia in the first place.
Keep it up!
MatthiasFarland 2 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
You have a sick mind, urging people to do what 'makes them happy'. Should cannibals be allowed to do what makes them happy? Of course not.
You can check on the stats, and find them verified by reports of the Department of Health.
Homosexuals should only be put into prison awaiting trial. Upon conviction, they should be put to death, just as murderers, rapists, and pedophiles( nambla marched in homosexual parades in the 80's ).
spammelot 2 years ago
I don't recall telling anyone to do what "makes them happy", could you please point out where I did? Additionally, I can't find any research done recently that concludes that gay sex is the origin of AIDs, or that homosexuals want to destroy free speech.
As for your comments about NAMBLA, perhaps they did march in parades, however what does that prove? That's like saying "Hitler had a moustache, therefor all moustaches cause genocide".
Try again.
GreatAtheismo 2 years ago
Think the reference was "be happy with who you are". There is nothing wrong with being happy with being homosexual, because it doesn't harm people like cannibalism does. Then again, maybe I'm deluded. I haven't read Conservapedia's trusworthy article on homosexuality.
Unavailablehandle 2 years ago 8
@Unavailablehandle
Right you are. Wingnuts are usually quick to pull out the cannibalism argument. What they don't seem to realize (or, more likely, refuse to accept) is that cannabilism is an action, whereas homosexuality is more of a trait.
Sure, there are... certain actions involved in homosexuality, but where's the harm in them? Conservapedia makes a failed attempt to portray them as harmful, and I certainly recommend you have a browse through the article, it's rather good for a chuckle.
GreatAtheismo 2 years ago
@Unavailablehandle
I would argue that mutually consenting cannibalism doesn't hurt people either.
rkyeun 1 year ago