AIR CRASH AN-12 CONGO

[fiverats1]

Y U NO SHOW IMPACT?!

[marktimmer2212]

terrible

[andgate2000]

Never ...ever...fly in Africa...china....or eastern Europe.

[215alessio]

where is the "KABOOM" moment?

[JuggalocodeChile1988]

@215alessio Same thing with the C 17 crash video with the impact cut off!

[Hatejews1]

SSBIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMMMMMMMM­MMMMMMMMMM

[21boxhead]

Censorship is stupid

[antdez1]

CENSORSHIP!! FUCK YOU

[basimpsn]

Anyone notice only the two left engine was at full power causing yaw

[vtwinbreed]

@basimpsn Yes, the 2 engine failed.. Aircraft was declared un-airworthy, but was flown anyway.

[PilotoHenrique]

The Russian aircraft industry and its engineering ... osama died before discovering his fatal potential. I do not know what could be worse, 30 nuclear power plants exploding or a Tupolev flying over our houses.

[Pvjinflight]

@PilotoHenrique These planes are very old, operated in bad conditions with bad maintenance and often not so good pilot training. No western plane can compete with these in harsh conditions of Africa.

[215alessio]

@Pvjinflight maybe you are right. But tel why does Russia buys european aircraft if they are more fragile than russian ones?

[Pvjinflight]

@215alessio Because they are more fuel efficient. Most of russian airports are modern with concrete runway so there is no need for planes to stand extremely harsh conditions, but in many african countrie they operate in airports without kind of maintenance facilities and dirt runways, sometimes even from roads. Pretty few western planes can compete in that kind of extreme conditions. Mostly russian airlines buy only bigger passenger aircrafts from west.

[215alessio]

@Pvjinflight C 130 hercules can but it is a military cargo / personnel carrier plane

[215alessio]

@Pvjinflight the Tu-154M was a tough russian plane but they have some problems .. maybe too old and bad mantained

[Pvjinflight]

@215alessio Yeah, old and mainly operated by small airlines with often not very good safety culture. Also they are not as fuel efficient as their western counterparts, there is no need to operate TU-154 when for example A320 can do same job with much less fuel, but then for example western ATR 42 is more fuel efficient too, but cant be operated in as harsh conditions as An-24 for example, and thats why russian prop planes are still flying in areas with worst conditions for flying.

[cossack13]

@215alessio It is simple business.

[ATMCoord2]

VMCA roll.

[hayokamashi]

where is the kaboom ?

[straighttailpilot]

@OfficialCrashVideos may God forbid that the fsx expert will put me in my place.

[straighttailpilot]

@OfficialCrashVideos deduced what? you can see the smoke coming out of 2 engines and not out of the other two. you can see the indboard prop stopped and the rest I hunted around the net for info on any interviews and whatnot. does it make you feel good to mock people?

[straighttailpilot]

it actrually looks like the right inboard engine prop is feathered. still this should not have happened.

[HLordz301]

Antonov do make the worst planes in the world

[gnarkillkicksass]

@HLordz301 Sorry but how do you draw that conclusion? From my time flying in Africa I found that Antonovs were able to take off with a larger load in "hot and high" conditions, less susceptible to fuel contamination and more time between scheduled maintenance plus parts were cheaper then the L-100 (civilian C-130) I was flying. Hence the UN have more on contract then they do western aircraft.

[gomsc011]

@HLordz301 Thats absoltly not true. Antonov make good planes. NATO and UN use for transport the An-124,An-225,and they like it. This plane was so old,and was a bad maintaince,bad manintance have lot of cargo planes,which fly in Africa. They have'nt enogh money,and good technical ground crew. And overloand is also often in african planes.But they pushed to pilots to fly! Im Hungarian,I flew with agricultural Antonov AN-2,I like it,and the pilot says this is so reliable,and easy controllable plane

[TyrbovinT]

з двигатель во флюгере, 4-й авторотирует. 1 и 2 на режиме( дымные следы). Реактивный момент от 1 и 2 двигателей перевернул самолёт, плюс отрицательная тяга от 4го дв. Скорость видимо на грани сваливания, рн и элероны до предела на вывод. Но скорости и высоты нет.

При ротации 4 го двигателя даже при работающем 3 м. , конец.

[Flyingbadgers2001]

Engines 3 and 4 are flamed out and both props at full feathered position. Notice they have no exhust trail on 3 and 4. Engines 1 and 2 are fully operational. I would have to say that the AN-12 was "heavy" with fuel, pax, cargo when it lost two engines which put it in a right wing stall and a unrecoverable spin. also that the gear and flaps was also down at impact.

[michaeljess99]

#68 - Meest besproken (Vandaag) - Humor

#69 - Meest aan favorieten toegevoegd (Vandaag) - Humor

#20 - Hoogst beoordeeld (Vandaag) - Humor

#97 - Hoogst beoordeeld (Deze week) - Humor

[angel4duck]

if you want to see it crash its at liveleak dot com

[Slaterator]

Sad tragedy. R.I.P to the victims...

[AirCreation100]

i wanted to see it hit the ground.

[1plusultra]

@AirCreation100 Sit in the airplane and hit it on the ground and you see everything