@gregrutz I am amazed at how atheist give Christopher Hitchens so much credibility when he does not have the same credentials David Berlinski has. Science is very flawed and always will be, that's why the information is being constantly updated. I love science but I have no illusion about it. Again, it has its limits. As long as you have flawed human beings that are vulnerable to biases, science will always be flawed. And please no immature responds.
@TheJeo81270 Science is updated as new discoveries are made, not because it is flawed. Humans are biased, that is why science has to be repeatable. If you don't think we have over 98% the same DNA a chimps you can repeat the work yourself.
Most scientists accept God, all of them accept evolution.
The fact that this video has been rated 1 star proves the old saying that the truth hurts.
Sorry, atheist kiddies, rating every anti-evolution video on YouTube 1 star isn't going to effect the truth one iota. All it's doing is proving just how vile and hostile you maggots are.
Actually, Berlinski is just an idiot who refuses to believe anyone who shows him he is wrong because he is incapable of what us intellgient folks like to call "learning". Berlinski has no expertise whatsoever in any scientific field on the topics he is discussing, yet he thinks he has outsmarted the real scientists. And Einstein was a Deist and in no way whatsoever believed in intelligent design.
There's no assumptions involved in my comment. Berlinski doesn't work with evolutionary biology, nor has he ever worked with evolutionary biology. He is a philosopher and author. Every time anyone shows him the problems in his logic, he cries about it and desperately tries kicking the ball down the field a bit more in the mean time.
@TavishHill He is a mathematician, maths is pure science where conjecture and hypothesis don't cut it. Evo Biology is the lowliest discipline of the least of the Natural Sciences(biology). His logic is very rarely out, unless he is wilfully being a stubborn ass. Where it matters he usually nails it!
@PLScotland A philosopher is NOT the same thing as a mathematician. His failures of simple statistics and probability theory illustrate this point clearly. Being a smart ass is fine. I enjoy debaters employing entertaining rhetorical approaches from tiem to time so long as they aren't ignoring key points brought up by others. Berlinski has dismissed, but not addressed, the points mentioned by various folks pointing out his failures to understand the basic elements of probability theory.
Probability...sounds more like Stats than Maths:)
He is a Mathematician BTW and yes he also holds a PhD in Phil from somewhere?
PLScotland 1 year ago
"We don't know''
Yes, real scientists know.
gregrutz 2 years ago
@gregrutz I am amazed at how atheist give Christopher Hitchens so much credibility when he does not have the same credentials David Berlinski has. Science is very flawed and always will be, that's why the information is being constantly updated. I love science but I have no illusion about it. Again, it has its limits. As long as you have flawed human beings that are vulnerable to biases, science will always be flawed. And please no immature responds.
TheJeo81270 1 year ago
@TheJeo81270 Science is updated as new discoveries are made, not because it is flawed. Humans are biased, that is why science has to be repeatable. If you don't think we have over 98% the same DNA a chimps you can repeat the work yourself.
Most scientists accept God, all of them accept evolution.
gregrutz 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
No really, that is free speech doing its job. And it is not the truth that hurts in this video, its the stupid.
ClanRewired 3 years ago
The fact that this video has been rated 1 star proves the old saying that the truth hurts.
Sorry, atheist kiddies, rating every anti-evolution video on YouTube 1 star isn't going to effect the truth one iota. All it's doing is proving just how vile and hostile you maggots are.
TheJaredJammer 3 years ago 5
Actually, Berlinski is just an idiot who refuses to believe anyone who shows him he is wrong because he is incapable of what us intellgient folks like to call "learning". Berlinski has no expertise whatsoever in any scientific field on the topics he is discussing, yet he thinks he has outsmarted the real scientists. And Einstein was a Deist and in no way whatsoever believed in intelligent design.
TavishHill 3 years ago
Why don't you read his bio first before making such an assumption?
bodiezoffa 3 years ago 5
There's no assumptions involved in my comment. Berlinski doesn't work with evolutionary biology, nor has he ever worked with evolutionary biology. He is a philosopher and author. Every time anyone shows him the problems in his logic, he cries about it and desperately tries kicking the ball down the field a bit more in the mean time.
TavishHill 3 years ago
@TavishHill He is a mathematician, maths is pure science where conjecture and hypothesis don't cut it. Evo Biology is the lowliest discipline of the least of the Natural Sciences(biology). His logic is very rarely out, unless he is wilfully being a stubborn ass. Where it matters he usually nails it!
PLScotland 1 year ago
@PLScotland A philosopher is NOT the same thing as a mathematician. His failures of simple statistics and probability theory illustrate this point clearly. Being a smart ass is fine. I enjoy debaters employing entertaining rhetorical approaches from tiem to time so long as they aren't ignoring key points brought up by others. Berlinski has dismissed, but not addressed, the points mentioned by various folks pointing out his failures to understand the basic elements of probability theory.
TavishHill 1 year ago
Wrong wrong wrong wrong, wrong wrong wrong wrong. WRONG! WRONG! WRONG! WRONG! WRONG! WRONG! WRONG! WRONG! WRONG! WRONG!
(that's my WRONG clock going off. Must be 10am.)
DaveGrossmanSoloBass 3 years ago