common kid...I agree marijuana prohibition is the stupidest fucking thing in the world...but you arguing about changing legislation in a small hick towns circuit court is perhaps the funniest (and stupidest) thing I have ever seen. AND by telling him your not paying he wrote the proposal already to put you in jail, when if you just said nothing and didn't pay it, you would have been off for months before it came back. Just a note if you don't pay it, serving time of your record is NOT good.
@joe4156 talk about a waste of time prosecuting a victimless occurance laws should have a victim or they are merely aimed at controlling making the defendant the only victim
@joe4156 It's not the piss-ant that is wasting tax payer $. He's just trying to keep a marijuana possesion charge from a record that will follow him the rest of his life. What's a waste of tax payer $ is the failed war on drugs. Especially Marijuana. In which we spend billions to prosecute young people who decide to try marijuana. Then give them a criminal record for a victimless crime.
-continued. Being hipster of the year may feel good while you're being marched away by the cops with a crowd cheering your name, but we'll see if he feels the same way a few years down the road when he not only realizes the effect that possession charge has on his livelihood, but that he completely brought it upon himself.
@pjhomestudio I can assure you it was more than for just the sake of modest (far from it) internet celebrity. Whatever entry level cubicle he is now precluded from groveling in will to him be a fair pittance. He is taking a stand against a inane law and state activities precipitated by it. Sure his case was not tenable, nor did he approach it quite the way he should have. It's his life however and if it isn't for these grassroots "worker ants" doing these types of things nothing would ever..
@pjhomestudio ...change. And your commemoration of "badass" Zach Galifianakis would be nearly as pointless as FreeKeeners cheering Mr. Carroll pleading not guilty, since both effectuate nothing in the short term. Galifiankis is entertaining, Carroll is actually trying to change things. Get that? And given that I'm as tired of the "funny stoner" schtick as I am, I'd have to say I give more laurels to Carroll over actors for their respective inputs into this marijuana struggle. K badass?
- continued. Do you know why it's so much more badass when well-known musicians, actors or what have you like Zach Galifinakis (well, supposedly, that is) openly flaunt marijuana use? Because nothing happens to them. Worst case scenario, they recieve a fine that is nothing more than chump-change to them, and a charge that has absolutely no effect on their prospects for future or continued employment.
Congradulations Mr. Marc Emery-wannabe. You've officially wasted taxpayer dollars, public officials' time, and on top of that, earned yourself a shiney new job-killing possession charge just for the sake of modest internet celebrity.This fellow doesn't even well-represent the cause, stuttering out completely ridiculous questions like "Do you think I have the right to possess property?" and "What is a right?", and I'm genuinely curious as to what effect he thought that would have on a real judge.
This is a farce. James (Andrew) Carrol only showed how much of a joke the free keeners really are. Mind you, he also ran for council in Keene, and was congratulated by Ian for coming in last. (8 of 8). The motive is to waste tax-payer money, yet claim there are too many taxes, and no government.. This according to the free keeners should get you to join the lot, so You can get housing from the shelter (subsidized housing), food from the food bank, (also food stamps) ,and hate the gov't.
You people are correct, this IS a complete waste of taxpayer's money. However, the fault for this is Carroll, not the judicial system. if a defendant pleads "not guilty," then they are allowed a trial under law. Carroll KNEW that he had been arrested for possession of an illegal substance, marijuana; the entire event was even filmed. Instead of just pleading guilty to the charges, he opted for a trial and pled not guilty. As a result, we have this epic waste of time and money.
This is a complete waste of time and taxpayer dollars. Mr. Carroll comes off as a petulant child and a posturing, would-be political intellectual. I fully support all forms of personal liberty and ardently desire more reasonable drug legislation in this country. That being said, in my opinion Mr. Carroll should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law and held in contempt of court to boot. If you want to make a reasonable argument in a court of law, obtain legal counsel.
In the 1st minute the Judge said, "The state has the burden to prove this case beyond a reasonable doubt, and they'll do that with evidence that they'll produce."
- The Judge seems to have already decided that the state WILL (has) meet their burden of proof (to find Mr. Carroll guilty, irregardless.)
I can only wonder how much tax dollars where wasted on this? this should be treated as an auto ticket, go to the court and pay a fin, The courts are still getting their money and the waste of police force and man power can be used on REAL serious crimes. The joke the courts and fed's play on the common people are full of loop holes, closed door meetings, and financial gain on the Federal benefit. The fed's will threaten states with finical audits if they do not enforce their fascist quota
This is a great example of how well the government brainwashes it's workers to ignore logic and obey their commands. It is uplifting to see someone actually pressing.
what pride or what reason do these idiots have for trying to destroy his life over a plant? ignorance and idiocracy seem to know no bounds in the majority of this country, and as a South Carolina citizen believe me I've seen plenty of ignorance and idiocracy in my day.
Weed is the best thing you can do for yourself without a prescription, I'm so tired of all this propoganda put out by extremists that are afraid to try new things because it would throw off their boring, secure cycle of life. Seriously, marijuana is a NATURAL RIGHT I should have as a human being to partake in if I choose to do so. If you don't like it, that's great. Stop trying to stop me from doing it and for god sakes stop saying that alcohol is somehow better.
If we all have the right to liberty, then how can holding 0.29 grams of cannabis be a crime? I thought liberty is the right of an individual to do as one wish's so long as the individual is not violating the rights of another.
I think it's ok to posses pot and use in private but as for openly displaying I can see where that would be a problem especially with minors around. I think a person has just as much a right to use as a person also has a right to be drug free and not exposed to drugs. If you use that's ok. I mean the subject could be masturbating and it's obviously not ok to masturbate in public but if you masturbated in private it shouldn't bother anyone. You have a right to enjoy yourself in private.
all this for a little bit of pot? jeeze i don't know how many times i've carried and smoked weed.. never been busted for a little bit of smoke. how retarded. I could see if there's a serious crime but over weed? WTF is wrong with these nazis...
You handled yourself very well... I must say I'm impressed with your knowledge of the court system. And I like that you were/ are fighting this fight simply because you believe the law is unjust, and not because you, yourself are a "pot-head". If we had more americans like you, that stand up for what they believe in, as opposed to just complaining all the time, our government wouldn't have so much damn power. POWER TO THE PEOPLE! Give 'em hell Andrew... absolute hell.
The video of the police taking the marijuana should have been presented to show that there was not proper chain of custody. The video is also on youtube. The officer took an unknown substance from defendant, and put it in is rear pocket and then sat down in his car and drove away.
The defense will always throw in witnesses and questions to discuss procedure to help make you lose focus of your case. You need your own professional witnesses to lead the charge with to regain focus of your trial. And get a jury trial. Exercise your right to a jury trial if your going to argue constitutionality and the law.
First, have legal council, not to represent you, but rather to help guide you, you can still represent yourself, but take a guide. Second, why did you not get a jury trial? The judge will find you guilty on the fact that you did in fact have weed on you. With a jury you can argue the relevence of the law itself, but not with a judge, he doesn't have that ability under the law, only a jury has that power to also judge the law itself. Do some research next time. Hey, practice makes perfect.
The judge is only there to hear whether or not carrol possessed the marijuana. The judge gets it believe me. That is why the judge remained so nice and polite to andrew throughout the whole thing. A typical judge that didn't understand andrews case would have gotten frustrated and lost his temper. This was as good of a judge as he was going to get.
i hate the fact they object on wether something is relevant or not! Especialy when in this case it is regarding to Marijuana!!! which the FUCKING CONSTITUTION was fuckin written on....
allthis crap is simply mumbo jumbo to me
we are talking about an Ancient / sacred herb fully non toxic to humans and about a Human Life being Judged.
dunno bout u only entity i want judging me is the creator. we need to abolish control systems all i see hear is neo nazi b.s its time to control ourselfs
You, sir, are a douchebag. You might have had a case, but you made admissions of guilt during trial! You failed to object to "chain of custody" evidence! Your questions on cross examination were generally improper.
You should have hired a lawyer. You didn't, and you were convicted as a result.
I believe marijuana should be legal, but if you're on trial, you need to fight the law as it is written. Your constitutional arguments were frivolous, and worthless. Next time, hire a lawyer.
NH has no sales tax so the more people that challenge their charges the less money the state will have for other things. Voters will see how much money is being used to prosecute and make up their own mind. Here in the UK you can legally buy Cannabis seeds. Come here....at least we have a bit more sense
Our taxes are going for this? what the !@#!@#$#, the banks are stealing from us with force of gov arms and guns to our heads and these court jesters are wasting more of our money. Why does the court people not reduce their pay, pro-rata for their time in shams like this. This kid did great, learn and re-adapt, and thank u, learned alot.
While the absolute havoc caused by this marijuana bust, or the commotion caused by having the liberty activists clog the courtroom entrance is undoubtedly quite disruptive, I think your real break through is going to come when the judge gets tired of dealing with the complete blithering idiot in his courtroom. "Ahhhh Ladies and Gentlemen of the juu juu juhh juhh juhh juh jury, on January 4th of this year, my clients did visit the Sack of Suds c c c c con con convenience store."
so you abject to having people block the enterance to their own court, sorry but this is just another demonstration of the inability of government to enforce laws that the people don't want enforced, do you really think this court case will stop anyone smoking cannabis?
"The right to own property argument was pretty damn good."
no good when based upon the NH constitution. anyone may crush such a constitution-based argument by invoking article 3, a haven of socialist nitwittery:
"3. When men enter into a state of society, they surrender up some of their natural rights to that society, in order to ensure the protection of others; and, without such an equivalent, the surrender is void."
stunningly rank, from a state with the motto "Live Free or Die".
if some one said that to me i'd simply say back "any society that would give up a little liberty for a little security deserves neither, and will lose both" Benjamin Franklin.
I didn't read through the comments so someone may have made this point. How crazy is it this scenario. You are forced to say hey judge you are breaking the law and I'm going to appeal and fight you. That cannot win favor with him. Then he gets to arbitrarily give you your penality. Madness!!
Jeez, the guy who is on trial is so incredibly naive. I can't believe he tried to cross-examine the witness with such a far-out strategy and then bitched to the judge *during* his trial. Has he never been through a legal proceeding before?
If you're going to try to defend yourself in court, you'd better have a lawyer, or won't be taken seriously at all. Period.
Even so, the guy in the robe is a huge douche, as is the guy arguing on behalf of the state. Fuck them both.
"If you're going to try to defend yourself in court, you'd better have a lawyer, or won't be taken seriously at all. Period."
my record in court proves you're full of it, as usual. snot-nosed morons (e.g., chris brunner the RP stooge) should shut mouths and concentrate on drying behind ears. gonna take you many years, hoss.
Okay JizzMopper, let's hear your record in court.
Since you're old and jobless (I'm assuming since you apparently spend all your time sitting at home watching and commenting on 5,552 YouTube videos), you should have plenty of time to explain.
your usual inept inaccuracy. you are such a stupid fuck.
"Okay JizzMopper, let's hear your record in court."
total pro se as defendant: 3 speeding dismissed / not guilty, 1 trespassing nolle prosequi, 1 concealed weapon dismissed / not guilty, 1 speeding guilty -- on appeal 5/15/09.
now do what you do as a matter of course: make more false assumptions and run your yapper based upon them. according to you, however, in no case was i "taken seriously at all".
this judge loves running the simon-says mind fuck, as with ian months ago. not even 2 minutes in, and he's screwing unnecessarily with the victim, who -- following the protocol of ever court i've ever seen -- stands when addressing the chief tyrant. nah, he must be swatted. and the career parasite known as "prosecutor" does as he will. vermin.
I don't see how anyone holds the judge accountable. He gave Andrew miles of leeway and even agreed with him to an extent on morals. Truth of the matter is he didn't do enough work to get ready for this case and the results went accordingly.
he had months to study the game... he continues to make political arguments in a court of law. They dont care about opinions its called HEARSAY. I remember seeing this video and I knew something like this could be the only result. He should have done his home work more thorough.
hahaha. By standing when they say stand, or following any other order, you are recognizing their jurisdiction. By identifying yourself as the defendant, you attach your body to the fictional person which the court can then treat unequally. Etc...
They don't have to be treated like kings. Once you obey an order from them without notifying them of fee schedule, you have recognized their jurisdiction and agreed to their power over you. Don't identify yourself as the defendant or give your "first and last name". Simply say you are known as Blank and representing that person. Further, don't follow any order by the judge without notifying the judge of a fee schedule by which he will be charged for his orders.
Two sets of rules. One for the rulers that enjoy the full benefits of self-ownership, and the other set for us scum bag citizens who are regarded as sub-humans in the eyes of the state. Please just go kill yourselves all you statists out there.
You can't argue against the punishment you haven't yet received. His arguments are completely legitimate... but inappropriate at that trial. He's acting on what will happen rather than what has happened.
You can argue that you can't, naturally as in means of ability,
You can't represent your civil issues at your best interest when there's a threat over your head for criminal issues at the same hearing. And they know that and use this fact in not such a good faith at all.
As a psychology researcher I can tell I see here a hoax, a scam. The judge speaks way to fast. This is dishonesty. Intimidation. Scamming. Bla Bla Bla. Superfast and doublemeaning. yeah yeah. The SCIENTIFIC FACTS of psychology show that the judge is an EGOMANIAC. You can take my word on it. No fair trial here. Slow down bitch. You're just a bitch when you scam everybody.
when stressed to speed the chat, to maintain "acceptable" silence you must do faces of a "thinker" / "concentrator" / "dumb i-dont-get-it-wait" (watch rob menard he's a good actor there)
What I mentions is only 1 of 100 or more proofs that can be seen and heard, that the trial is not fair. I cann't do it all. You guys need a professional video editor / J.j ;p Good Footage! That stuff gonna be rare one day!
Andrew, you're an extremely brave soul. You probably taught a few of the people in the court there a little about the NH State Constitution. At the very least, you probably got a few of them thinking about it. And especially you got them thinking about these asinine marijuana laws (and even something about human dignity and rights). So, in those respects you won. Hat's off to you Andrew...
Stupid immature idiot and what makes him look worse is he thinks he`s being clever.
FeignofCordor 1 month ago
Damn, this kid had those cops shook. Completely embarrassed the judge. That's how you know these courts are bullshit.
cisjay 2 months ago
this guy is a straight dumbass. he looks like a total faggot too
a1n2d3r4e5w6yi 6 months ago
BRAVOO
bbucur 8 months ago
common kid...I agree marijuana prohibition is the stupidest fucking thing in the world...but you arguing about changing legislation in a small hick towns circuit court is perhaps the funniest (and stupidest) thing I have ever seen. AND by telling him your not paying he wrote the proposal already to put you in jail, when if you just said nothing and didn't pay it, you would have been off for months before it came back. Just a note if you don't pay it, serving time of your record is NOT good.
KATOMATE01 9 months ago
OMG! If you smoke weed - You will want to listen to this message I found. ENJOY! # 949-963-3422
DizzyDozen420 1 year ago
by law, i can lie in a hospital bed with liver failure due to alcohol abuse. but i am not allowed to smoke a herb in my home. fucking governments!!
johnnyb390 1 year ago
Piss-Ant: Yes I'd like to testify.
Judge: Ok, come on up.
Piss-Ant: I have no questions.
Court/State: 1
Piss-Ant: 0
joe4156 1 year ago
Another "freekeene" piss-ant wasting the courts time and tax-payer money.
joe4156 1 year ago
@joe4156 talk about a waste of time prosecuting a victimless occurance laws should have a victim or they are merely aimed at controlling making the defendant the only victim
oddjobsunl 1 year ago
@joe4156 It's not the piss-ant that is wasting tax payer $. He's just trying to keep a marijuana possesion charge from a record that will follow him the rest of his life. What's a waste of tax payer $ is the failed war on drugs. Especially Marijuana. In which we spend billions to prosecute young people who decide to try marijuana. Then give them a criminal record for a victimless crime.
lamiac2411 11 months ago
"0.29 grams" !!! What a sad waste of tax dollars. Look at all the salaries sitting in that room.
WhichWing 1 year ago
Comment removed
pjhomestudio 1 year ago
-continued. Being hipster of the year may feel good while you're being marched away by the cops with a crowd cheering your name, but we'll see if he feels the same way a few years down the road when he not only realizes the effect that possession charge has on his livelihood, but that he completely brought it upon himself.
pjhomestudio 1 year ago
@pjhomestudio I can assure you it was more than for just the sake of modest (far from it) internet celebrity. Whatever entry level cubicle he is now precluded from groveling in will to him be a fair pittance. He is taking a stand against a inane law and state activities precipitated by it. Sure his case was not tenable, nor did he approach it quite the way he should have. It's his life however and if it isn't for these grassroots "worker ants" doing these types of things nothing would ever..
365to173repubsPWNED 1 year ago
@pjhomestudio ...change. And your commemoration of "badass" Zach Galifianakis would be nearly as pointless as FreeKeeners cheering Mr. Carroll pleading not guilty, since both effectuate nothing in the short term. Galifiankis is entertaining, Carroll is actually trying to change things. Get that? And given that I'm as tired of the "funny stoner" schtick as I am, I'd have to say I give more laurels to Carroll over actors for their respective inputs into this marijuana struggle. K badass?
365to173repubsPWNED 1 year ago
@pjhomestudio how is it a job killing charge.
oddjobsunl 1 year ago
- continued. Do you know why it's so much more badass when well-known musicians, actors or what have you like Zach Galifinakis (well, supposedly, that is) openly flaunt marijuana use? Because nothing happens to them. Worst case scenario, they recieve a fine that is nothing more than chump-change to them, and a charge that has absolutely no effect on their prospects for future or continued employment.
pjhomestudio 1 year ago
Congradulations Mr. Marc Emery-wannabe. You've officially wasted taxpayer dollars, public officials' time, and on top of that, earned yourself a shiney new job-killing possession charge just for the sake of modest internet celebrity.This fellow doesn't even well-represent the cause, stuttering out completely ridiculous questions like "Do you think I have the right to possess property?" and "What is a right?", and I'm genuinely curious as to what effect he thought that would have on a real judge.
pjhomestudio 1 year ago
This is a farce. James (Andrew) Carrol only showed how much of a joke the free keeners really are. Mind you, he also ran for council in Keene, and was congratulated by Ian for coming in last. (8 of 8). The motive is to waste tax-payer money, yet claim there are too many taxes, and no government.. This according to the free keeners should get you to join the lot, so You can get housing from the shelter (subsidized housing), food from the food bank, (also food stamps) ,and hate the gov't.
denni04011 1 year ago
You people are correct, this IS a complete waste of taxpayer's money. However, the fault for this is Carroll, not the judicial system. if a defendant pleads "not guilty," then they are allowed a trial under law. Carroll KNEW that he had been arrested for possession of an illegal substance, marijuana; the entire event was even filmed. Instead of just pleading guilty to the charges, he opted for a trial and pled not guilty. As a result, we have this epic waste of time and money.
zion653 1 year ago
This is a complete waste of time and taxpayer dollars. Mr. Carroll comes off as a petulant child and a posturing, would-be political intellectual. I fully support all forms of personal liberty and ardently desire more reasonable drug legislation in this country. That being said, in my opinion Mr. Carroll should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law and held in contempt of court to boot. If you want to make a reasonable argument in a court of law, obtain legal counsel.
stallingstarship 1 year ago
decriminalize!
blancheddacheese15 1 year ago
The judicial system is bullshit. End of story.
NovemberRainLove 1 year ago
In the 1st minute the Judge said, "The state has the burden to prove this case beyond a reasonable doubt, and they'll do that with evidence that they'll produce."
- The Judge seems to have already decided that the state WILL (has) meet their burden of proof (to find Mr. Carroll guilty, irregardless.)
pentiuman 1 year ago
I can only wonder how much tax dollars where wasted on this? this should be treated as an auto ticket, go to the court and pay a fin, The courts are still getting their money and the waste of police force and man power can be used on REAL serious crimes. The joke the courts and fed's play on the common people are full of loop holes, closed door meetings, and financial gain on the Federal benefit. The fed's will threaten states with finical audits if they do not enforce their fascist quota
TheKnives777 1 year ago
This is a great example of how well the government brainwashes it's workers to ignore logic and obey their commands. It is uplifting to see someone actually pressing.
VHDT10 1 year ago
what pride or what reason do these idiots have for trying to destroy his life over a plant? ignorance and idiocracy seem to know no bounds in the majority of this country, and as a South Carolina citizen believe me I've seen plenty of ignorance and idiocracy in my day.
ltownmre 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Weed is the best thing you can do for yourself without a prescription, I'm so tired of all this propoganda put out by extremists that are afraid to try new things because it would throw off their boring, secure cycle of life. Seriously, marijuana is a NATURAL RIGHT I should have as a human being to partake in if I choose to do so. If you don't like it, that's great. Stop trying to stop me from doing it and for god sakes stop saying that alcohol is somehow better.
ltownmre 1 year ago
If we all have the right to liberty, then how can holding 0.29 grams of cannabis be a crime? I thought liberty is the right of an individual to do as one wish's so long as the individual is not violating the rights of another.
atchisrj1 1 year ago
Possession of marijuana is an entirely victimless 'crime'. I often forget it's even illegal, it just doesn't compute.
zookap 1 year ago 3
lol "that's fine, he can go home to his family, whereas i'm getting thrown in jail for holding a plant". classic.
JonasBrothersBlowCok 2 years ago
fuck the government for fucking up so many people lives because of a harmless plant!!!
crazymolesk8er 2 years ago 3
I think it's ok to posses pot and use in private but as for openly displaying I can see where that would be a problem especially with minors around. I think a person has just as much a right to use as a person also has a right to be drug free and not exposed to drugs. If you use that's ok. I mean the subject could be masturbating and it's obviously not ok to masturbate in public but if you masturbated in private it shouldn't bother anyone. You have a right to enjoy yourself in private.
x11115 2 years ago
@x11115 If you masturbate in public it shouldn't bother anyone either, unless you cum on them.
Rayvn7 2 years ago
all this for a little bit of pot? jeeze i don't know how many times i've carried and smoked weed.. never been busted for a little bit of smoke. how retarded. I could see if there's a serious crime but over weed? WTF is wrong with these nazis...
x11115 2 years ago
You handled yourself very well... I must say I'm impressed with your knowledge of the court system. And I like that you were/ are fighting this fight simply because you believe the law is unjust, and not because you, yourself are a "pot-head". If we had more americans like you, that stand up for what they believe in, as opposed to just complaining all the time, our government wouldn't have so much damn power. POWER TO THE PEOPLE! Give 'em hell Andrew... absolute hell.
CoaCa2113 2 years ago
All that for marijuana.
People, get a clue. legalize.
A jury could of used their power of nulification.
spandy1212 2 years ago
nice try kid. but your argument would be less wasted in the supreme court.
bumpinbassface 2 years ago
what kind of court room is this? i hear cars passing by....in cour for marijuana huh....waste of time.
777AMAYA 2 years ago 2
The video of the police taking the marijuana should have been presented to show that there was not proper chain of custody. The video is also on youtube. The officer took an unknown substance from defendant, and put it in is rear pocket and then sat down in his car and drove away.
sfudman 2 years ago 2
The defense will always throw in witnesses and questions to discuss procedure to help make you lose focus of your case. You need your own professional witnesses to lead the charge with to regain focus of your trial. And get a jury trial. Exercise your right to a jury trial if your going to argue constitutionality and the law.
Superlibertytv 2 years ago
First, have legal council, not to represent you, but rather to help guide you, you can still represent yourself, but take a guide. Second, why did you not get a jury trial? The judge will find you guilty on the fact that you did in fact have weed on you. With a jury you can argue the relevence of the law itself, but not with a judge, he doesn't have that ability under the law, only a jury has that power to also judge the law itself. Do some research next time. Hey, practice makes perfect.
Superlibertytv 2 years ago
This defendent has a fool for a client!
NCICOK 2 years ago
Throw the dummy in jail!
NCICOK 2 years ago
for what purpose
sfudman 2 years ago
FUCK THE FEDS
RonPaulvsTyranny 2 years ago 4
No jury trial ?
jacquelineveronique 2 years ago
Exactly total waste of time
boots920 2 years ago
good luke mate happy tokin
crystalsunderground 2 years ago
then ud be wiping ur ass with the most expensive Piece of hemp paper on u.s. soil
diegopunk 2 years ago
i feel bad for andrew
cuz im sure he was thinking hed go in an fight for his rights to posses a "PLANT!"
let me repeat...
VEGETABLE MATTER!
and he goes in then w/e topic he fights he is answered with "i dont see the relevance"
then you judge....are lost.
fucking piggies
they THINK they control us
and the more WE think that that is tru! the more submissive we will get and the more aggresively hungry for power they will get
TUPAC AMARU/EMILIANOZAPATA/CHE VIVEN!
diegopunk 2 years ago
the judge is right about the irrelevance.
The judge is only there to hear whether or not carrol possessed the marijuana. The judge gets it believe me. That is why the judge remained so nice and polite to andrew throughout the whole thing. A typical judge that didn't understand andrews case would have gotten frustrated and lost his temper. This was as good of a judge as he was going to get.
jmd11185 2 years ago
i hate the fact they object on wether something is relevant or not! Especialy when in this case it is regarding to Marijuana!!! which the FUCKING CONSTITUTION was fuckin written on....
allthis crap is simply mumbo jumbo to me
we are talking about an Ancient / sacred herb fully non toxic to humans and about a Human Life being Judged.
dunno bout u only entity i want judging me is the creator. we need to abolish control systems all i see hear is neo nazi b.s its time to control ourselfs
diegopunk 2 years ago
FUCK the Constitution. I shit on it, then take the remaining pages out to wipe my ass with it.
420witchdoctor 2 years ago
You, sir, are a douchebag. You might have had a case, but you made admissions of guilt during trial! You failed to object to "chain of custody" evidence! Your questions on cross examination were generally improper.
You should have hired a lawyer. You didn't, and you were convicted as a result.
I believe marijuana should be legal, but if you're on trial, you need to fight the law as it is written. Your constitutional arguments were frivolous, and worthless. Next time, hire a lawyer.
ksanqkipsz 2 years ago
What a lame waste of time.
Alxscode 2 years ago
what a waste of a ton of money. :(
booyah685 2 years ago
backward yank idiots lol
truckerfromreno 2 years ago
i got to do this on june 22nd =/
GodFather663 2 years ago
How did it Turn Out?
cky923 2 years ago
NH has no sales tax so the more people that challenge their charges the less money the state will have for other things. Voters will see how much money is being used to prosecute and make up their own mind. Here in the UK you can legally buy Cannabis seeds. Come here....at least we have a bit more sense
Laced3cross 2 years ago
Our taxes are going for this? what the !@#!@#$#, the banks are stealing from us with force of gov arms and guns to our heads and these court jesters are wasting more of our money. Why does the court people not reduce their pay, pro-rata for their time in shams like this. This kid did great, learn and re-adapt, and thank u, learned alot.
LibertyJedi 2 years ago 3
"The right to own property argument was pretty damn good."
Not when said property is illegal to possess.
Props to Andrew for standing up to the man though. Good luck with the appeal.
fatb0b 2 years ago
While the absolute havoc caused by this marijuana bust, or the commotion caused by having the liberty activists clog the courtroom entrance is undoubtedly quite disruptive, I think your real break through is going to come when the judge gets tired of dealing with the complete blithering idiot in his courtroom. "Ahhhh Ladies and Gentlemen of the juu juu juhh juhh juhh juh jury, on January 4th of this year, my clients did visit the Sack of Suds c c c c con con convenience store."
TellySavalis 2 years ago
so you abject to having people block the enterance to their own court, sorry but this is just another demonstration of the inability of government to enforce laws that the people don't want enforced, do you really think this court case will stop anyone smoking cannabis?
fuckinghellyoutwat 2 years ago
y does the prosecutor swear the witnesses in... id object to that
chunkybutt420 2 years ago 3
Tax dollars well spent.... yeah right.
Rothgar12 2 years ago 6
the law is wrong not the bong
RevGreen 2 years ago 10
The right to own property argument was pretty damn good.
cowcidile 2 years ago 3
"The right to own property argument was pretty damn good."
no good when based upon the NH constitution. anyone may crush such a constitution-based argument by invoking article 3, a haven of socialist nitwittery:
"3. When men enter into a state of society, they surrender up some of their natural rights to that society, in order to ensure the protection of others; and, without such an equivalent, the surrender is void."
stunningly rank, from a state with the motto "Live Free or Die".
2ndAsstJizzMopper 2 years ago 7
if some one said that to me i'd simply say back "any society that would give up a little liberty for a little security deserves neither, and will lose both" Benjamin Franklin.
fuckinghellyoutwat 2 years ago 4
I didn't read through the comments so someone may have made this point. How crazy is it this scenario. You are forced to say hey judge you are breaking the law and I'm going to appeal and fight you. That cannot win favor with him. Then he gets to arbitrarily give you your penality. Madness!!
Jitgos 2 years ago 2
Jeez, the guy who is on trial is so incredibly naive. I can't believe he tried to cross-examine the witness with such a far-out strategy and then bitched to the judge *during* his trial. Has he never been through a legal proceeding before?
If you're going to try to defend yourself in court, you'd better have a lawyer, or won't be taken seriously at all. Period.
Even so, the guy in the robe is a huge douche, as is the guy arguing on behalf of the state. Fuck them both.
Good luck, naive dude.
chrislbrunner 2 years ago
"If you're going to try to defend yourself in court, you'd better have a lawyer, or won't be taken seriously at all. Period."
my record in court proves you're full of it, as usual. snot-nosed morons (e.g., chris brunner the RP stooge) should shut mouths and concentrate on drying behind ears. gonna take you many years, hoss.
2ndAsstJizzMopper 2 years ago
Okay JizzMopper, let's hear your record in court.
Since you're old and jobless (I'm assuming since you apparently spend all your time sitting at home watching and commenting on 5,552 YouTube videos), you should have plenty of time to explain.
chrislbrunner 2 years ago
"watching and commenting on 5,552"
your usual inept inaccuracy. you are such a stupid fuck.
"Okay JizzMopper, let's hear your record in court."
total pro se as defendant: 3 speeding dismissed / not guilty, 1 trespassing nolle prosequi, 1 concealed weapon dismissed / not guilty, 1 speeding guilty -- on appeal 5/15/09.
now do what you do as a matter of course: make more false assumptions and run your yapper based upon them. according to you, however, in no case was i "taken seriously at all".
2ndAsstJizzMopper 2 years ago
this judge loves running the simon-says mind fuck, as with ian months ago. not even 2 minutes in, and he's screwing unnecessarily with the victim, who -- following the protocol of ever court i've ever seen -- stands when addressing the chief tyrant. nah, he must be swatted. and the career parasite known as "prosecutor" does as he will. vermin.
2ndAsstJizzMopper 2 years ago 2
I don't see how anyone holds the judge accountable. He gave Andrew miles of leeway and even agreed with him to an extent on morals. Truth of the matter is he didn't do enough work to get ready for this case and the results went accordingly.
st4nd4u 2 years ago
he had months to study the game... he continues to make political arguments in a court of law. They dont care about opinions its called HEARSAY. I remember seeing this video and I knew something like this could be the only result. He should have done his home work more thorough.
st4nd4u 2 years ago
gold fringe on flag ! Admiralty law the UCC
wcarlpdrysdale 2 years ago
What a pack of disgusting criminals.
JesseKantstopolis 2 years ago 3
hahaha. By standing when they say stand, or following any other order, you are recognizing their jurisdiction. By identifying yourself as the defendant, you attach your body to the fictional person which the court can then treat unequally. Etc...
capobdi 2 years ago
Don't you love how judges have to be treated like kings otherwise you'll be thrown in jail for contempt.
JesseKantstopolis 2 years ago 3
They don't have to be treated like kings. Once you obey an order from them without notifying them of fee schedule, you have recognized their jurisdiction and agreed to their power over you. Don't identify yourself as the defendant or give your "first and last name". Simply say you are known as Blank and representing that person. Further, don't follow any order by the judge without notifying the judge of a fee schedule by which he will be charged for his orders.
capobdi 2 years ago 2
You think these criminals care about the law? LOL!!!! Try that in court and see what they do to you. They are C R I M I N A L S. Got it?
JesseKantstopolis 2 years ago
Two sets of rules. One for the rulers that enjoy the full benefits of self-ownership, and the other set for us scum bag citizens who are regarded as sub-humans in the eyes of the state. Please just go kill yourselves all you statists out there.
JesseKantstopolis 2 years ago
Surprisingly, Andrew wasn't handcuffed for all the standing he did :)
GloriousCoconut 2 years ago 4
His argument regarding severity of the punishment is good... but not appropriate until found guilty.
blogofbile 2 years ago
thumbs down - no offence ya? ;p
startxxx1991 2 years ago
You can't argue against the punishment you haven't yet received. His arguments are completely legitimate... but inappropriate at that trial. He's acting on what will happen rather than what has happened.
blogofbile 2 years ago
What you can do is:
You can argue that you can't, naturally as in means of ability,
You can't represent your civil issues at your best interest when there's a threat over your head for criminal issues at the same hearing. And they know that and use this fact in not such a good faith at all.
startxxx1991 2 years ago
16:00 Very good extra comment - This will help you proof this trial is done not in good faith and with a threat upon you. Good work Andrew!
startxxx1991 2 years ago 2
As a psychology researcher I can tell I see here a hoax, a scam. The judge speaks way to fast. This is dishonesty. Intimidation. Scamming. Bla Bla Bla. Superfast and doublemeaning. yeah yeah. The SCIENTIFIC FACTS of psychology show that the judge is an EGOMANIAC. You can take my word on it. No fair trial here. Slow down bitch. You're just a bitch when you scam everybody.
startxxx1991 2 years ago
scam in details:
smoking of senses by speeding the talk: 05:50
(andrew seem to already subjectivly try to catch-up the speed and answer without thinking)
mind control established: 06:40
result...: 11:12
startxxx1991 2 years ago
Let me remind you the rule of the guru:
take 4 minutes to answer
or
count till 400
answer with a question, always
when stressed to speed the chat, to maintain "acceptable" silence you must do faces of a "thinker" / "concentrator" / "dumb i-dont-get-it-wait" (watch rob menard he's a good actor there)
startxxx1991 2 years ago
What I mentions is only 1 of 100 or more proofs that can be seen and heard, that the trial is not fair. I cann't do it all. You guys need a professional video editor / J.j ;p Good Footage! That stuff gonna be rare one day!
startxxx1991 2 years ago
All this pomp and ceremony for a plant! How ridiculous these people are.
freemarketeer67 2 years ago 15
Andrew, you're an extremely brave soul. You probably taught a few of the people in the court there a little about the NH State Constitution. At the very least, you probably got a few of them thinking about it. And especially you got them thinking about these asinine marijuana laws (and even something about human dignity and rights). So, in those respects you won. Hat's off to you Andrew...
P3rf3ctStorm 2 years ago 4
He has much courage.
underdogmilitia 2 years ago 10
420
DeraJa 2 years ago 5
"Every time a law is passed more criminals are made"......so sad what the nation has become when it started on nobler principles.
Nickelodeon2002 2 years ago 8
No victim - no crime.
EdwardMandellHouse 2 years ago 16
Self defense FAIL!
thinkofwhy 2 years ago
At least when it does "fAiL" - You still saved your "lawyer fees" for food and medications. Self defense saved YOU!
startxxx1991 2 years ago