Added: 4 years ago
From: maax125
Views: 315,979
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (448)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Why do people refer to contrails as chemtrails.. It is simply condensation from the hot engines, not smoke as some people mistakely think??

  • air to air is always so cool to watch !

  • Can someone explain to me how to tell the difference between different Boeing jets.

  • @truv1217 You have to know what they look like. Each plane has it's own unique features, but they tend to look a lot a like. For instance, you need to know where the jet engines are mounted on a specific plane, how many engines that plane has, and it doesn't hurt to know what Boeing aircraft the major airlines fly. the Boeing 717 has 2 tail mounted engines. The Boeing 727 has 2 tail mounted engines and a 3rd engine built into the tail. It would help to know that no major carrier flies 727's now.

  • @truv1217 Another example is this: When you know what type of Boeing airplanes a carrier flies, it will be easier to indentify them. Southwest ONLY flies Boeing 737's (Possibly 717's too when the merger with Air Tran is complete) So whenever you see a Southwest plane, it's a 737. Jetblue does not operate any Boeing airplanes, so no matter what jetblue plane you see, it is not a Boeing airplane. That will help you to distinguish Boeing planes from other manufacturers. Bored yet?

  • my favorite united colours

  • 777-200 one of the older 777 United has !

  • I remember when I flew Continental Airlines from Newark, New Jersey to San Juan, Puerto Rico in 2003, I do recall seeing an American Airlines plane fly the opposite direction below me.

  • Boeing 777, you can tell because it has a vertically flattened Tail cone, the 767 has a cylindrical tail cone like the 757.

  • 777 for sure.

  • B762?

  • i dont give a shit what kind of plane it is

  • @IPainthack lololololol

  • who won? lol

  • 777

  • thats an Jet plane with a bunch of numbers jk boeing ## nice vid

  • the tailcone is too small for 777, me thinks its a 767

  • Haha, why is everyone fuming about the model of the plane. Hahah

  • spraying chemtrails over the ocean now.....lol! JK! Cool video.

  • I think it's a 777-200 ER: It wears the old UA colours, and afaik, the first orders of UA consisted of 200 and -200ER series. I'm not even sure, if they bought -200LRs or -300s recently, and if so, they would definitely be painted in the new colour scheme

  • Its a 777-200.

  • It's a 777-200LR...!!!

  • It's a Boeing 777-200ER

  • THAT IS A BOEING 76382702838292716173727392

  • 777

    

  • That is a 777.

  • you know what when i see some1 i know in the car on their car i tell my dad faster! but i guess you can't yell at the pilot there... whahaha

  • is it landing

  • @RatedNKA10 Landing? what do you mean?

  • Its a 777, i have a clear shot directly on 0:10 and the fuselage is shaped at a 777. Has no point nose like 767.

  • was there another plane?

  • nice camera work.

  • its beautiful - thats what it is - but defiantly not a jumbo (767) - the 'pregnant' body part is missing - A United 777 sounds right

  • @InfiltrateIndustries The 'jumbo' is the 747. The 777&767 have very similar body shapes.

    Fail :P

  • Comment removed

  • @Guydabest i dont know what happend there - thought 747 and type 767 - fail yes

  • Comment removed

  • beautiful

    

  • Aeromexico, 999 Mexican Airlines

  • Piper Cub

  • It looks more like a 777 !

  • uhh this is a united flight either 767 or 777

  • it`s a United 777

  • lucky comments, guys^^

    i think it's a aeromexico 777-2Q8 ... maybe mexico city-madrid or paris

  • Deffinetly a B777! Just wonder where its going? LHR, BRU? FRA or MUC.

  • i dont know if it has been said before but this is to 100% a mexicana 777

  • @CivilAviation1 How do you come to the conclusion or supposition that the airplane in question could be part of Mexicana airlines? Specifically, the 777.

  • @CivilAviation1 @CivilAviation1 How do you come to the conclusion or supposition that the airplane in question could be part of Mexicana airlines? Specifically, the 777.

    Mexicana's fleet does not include a B777, Aeromexico does

  • @KoolkatGn you are right, when i had posted my comment, i watched the video again, yeah ok aeromexico :)

  • High probability it's a 777.

    UA was one of the largest customers of the 777, and they use it mostly for long hauls.

  • Yep its a 777

  • its fake

  • yes its a Toyota =P

  • I think thats a Toyota

  • its a 777

  • Beautiful shot! It looks so graceful up there cruising like that.

  • its a 777

  • Boeing 777 United Airlines

  • mike's right, it's a 777, 67's fusalage is narrower and shorter, 77 is longer widebody and larger engines

  • sorry guys but thats definetely a 777

  • Comment removed

  • clearly a 767 the 777 is wider and has bigger engines

  • Yeah definately a 767, the 777's have much larger engines.

  • Do they even use 757s for such overseas flights? I read they use 767s and up for such flights.

  • @topgeardel they don't habe 757 ;-)

  • @ultrigaria22222 yes, they do. dumb ass.

  • @ultrigaria22222 : no, austrian doesn't have 757!

  • @ultrigaria22222 yes they fuckin do, dumb ass

    

  • no, dumb ass blödes sturres Kleinkind

  • @ultrigaria22222 : no, austrian doesn't have 757!

  • nwa used a 757-200 to AMS

    CO uses a 757-200 EWR-DUB

  • they use the 757-300 on BHX to EWR too. CO

  • CO also uses the 757-200 from Cleveland to Paris and Cleveland to London.

  • Exactly Delta757etops said it's 777 -UA I can also

    see the Pratt & Whittney bald headed eagle symbol on the side of the engines only UA-777 have that in their fleet

  • no this is a 767-300ER

  • nice zoom

  • Definitely NOT a 777. It's clearly a 767-300

  • United 777 definitely

  • Chemtrails!

  • @HunTer3600 asstrails. your ass

  • 777 its longer!

  • It's a British Airwyas, or it's an American Airlines?

  • United Airlines

  • its a 777 the APU exhaust is slanted, on the 767 its in a cone shape

  • its a 777. there is the eagle logo on the engine. I forgot what that means...

  • Pratt & Whitney logo...

  • srry bout that neg thumb... thanks... I miss working for UAL.....

  • You should've flipped them off, just like in traffic. lol

  • haha i'm joking yes it's a 777

  • 777?? thats a Cessna 172!! can't you see it people??

  • Lmfao.

  • na not funny aye

  • @mercury46 THAT AINT NO CESSNA 172 A CESSNA IS LIKE 20 TIMES SMALLER THAN A 767 OR A 777

  • @junior1234542 Learn sarcasm.

  • @fannypenis how will know if its sarcasm or not when i cant hear his tone of voice soo um i suggest u mind your hoses.

  • @junior1234542 You failed.

  • @junior1234542 LOL you are FUCKING STUPID..... hahahah you actually think that he thinks its a cessna??? hahahah your fat mother must of dropped you on your head like 500 times.

  • @mercury46 no its a boeing 777-200

  • @lufthansa330pilot Nope, it has raked wingtips so it's either a 777-300ER or 777-200LR

  • @gt5004life oh haha i didnt see the wingtips and united only has 772 so its a 777-200lr

  • yes its a boeing 777

  • yep this is 777 look at the raked wingtips.

    767-400s have them too but only delta and continental airlines own 767-400s

  • 777-200

  • Affirm it's a United Airlines 777

  • Cesna.

  • lmao!!!! nice

  • @Snoopo are u creazy man........ajjajajaajjajaja

  • @Snoopo Cessna

  • @Snoopo Cessna lol

  • I agree as well. It is a 777.

  • Also definate B777, notice APU exhaust cone, comes to point instead of rounded, biggest difference, also the Engines are are more inline with size of aircraft

  • thats always something cool to see

  • omigod it's teh chemtrails!!!!!!1!1one!!!1!

  • Youre all wrong, that definitely an upgraded Bristol Brabazon.

  • c'est un 777 200er

  • 777-200

  • Its a F16

  • lol

  • Awesome Footage, i tried to get some similar to that on my ryanair flight back from krakow, poland, as many were crossing our flight path. minute i got my camera out didnt see another single aircraft. typical!

  • its a 777

  • i would say a 77 because thats quite a long flight

  • sorry no its a 767 777 are much much longer and have larger engines and i flew dallas to london on a 767 with extended fuel tanks...

  • People are still going on about "chemtrails"? As in, in a serious way?

    Since when did good old contrails become something scary?

    Do some proper research - science is far more than simple observation.

    Get a degree in physics for a starter. Then work some time at an airport as a ground handling crew as well as an aircraft mechanic. Then go check out an aircraft factory.

    Some urban myths are so easily and obviously busted that one really wonders why theyre still around!

  • And what facts do you base your negative assumption on? From the pictures I have seen the chem and con trails look entirely different. Contrails have been around for many years and people have known for years what they look like. The more recent sightings look really different, and so that, along with other information, are put together to speculate that something may be going on that is not altogether good.

  • I base "assumption" on experience, Ive been in aviation my whole life and Ive always had a keen interest in science/technology. There is no room in modern jet planes for the endless ammount of liquids/gas needed to create chemtrail. The industry around it would be gigantic, and impossible to cover up (hundreds of thousands of people working directly with it). Ive myself several times been passenger in jets (high-bypass turbofans) leaving long-lasting contrails. New engines = different contrails.

  • Again assumptions. You know nothing about what agents they might be using. You have no idea of what concentrations they may in. Our government has covered up things for years.

    Being an engineer for many years, I fully understand the difference between a jet and a turbofan engine. Being a "passenger on jets" does not make you an expert, and I have no idea what you mean be "been in aviation", but what is being asserted here is fully plausible and fully possible.

  • I'm sorry. I forgot to bring my foil hat to this party. The thing that annoys me the most is that these people who come up with this stuff always say "I'm an engineer, or I'm in aviation, or I'm Dr. Lawrence Thermodae, esq." I'm telling you I'm just an average human being and even I'm smart enough to say "Often the most likely explanation is the simplest." They're clouds, not chem-trails. So let's just shut up and enjoy the video.

  • Comment removed

  • i took a shit yesterday. it looked different. I think its the feds.

  • You're full of CRAP Dweeb!!! Disinformation spreading LIAR!

    That is NOT a contrail and you well know it you government FICTITIOUS AGENT! Have a stupid day! Who signs your paycheck??????????????????????­???????????????

  • i think its a b767

  • its a triple 7.. look at the raked wingtips and the razor blade tail

  • noo.......

    everyone research contrails......and building 7

  • It's a sad day when people enter such a deep denial that they wish away our own physical observations.

  • This unprecedented activity covers the sky daily in many areas. Plumes spread out and have (locally) set a record as the "dimmest" in recorded history.

    We have documented this, observed all related patterns, and taken extensive timelapse.

    Sensitive people are able to sense a salty-metallic taste to the air when this occurs.

    I know human nature well enough to know that people feel safe in numbers. They are too fearful to admit seeing "unusual" things, even when observed.

  • I think the spiders in your head are talking too much. ;-))))) ROFLMAO

    Thanks for the good laugh, I needed it. Cheers mate.

  • I have been a professional researcher for 20 years. Part of this time working with a political party doing legal research.

    During this time, we uncovered laws/memorandum facilitating/mandating global depopulation. There is not enough space here to explain, but it involves the purchase of 400 tankers from Airbus (Europe) that are being used in this capacity.

    I truly feel sorry for you who live in fear, and denial of what we see happening before our eyes.

    Info: urlbamcom/ha/M002Y

  • Science if a process of observation.

    We can all see chemtrails. Many with sensitive senses, including myself can taste the salty-metallic-chemical taste in the air when their appear.

    These are observations and are therefore, by definition, scientific.

    Chemtrails also cause a myriad of symptoms in myself and others that are identical to mercury and barium poisoning.

    I understand that this is scary, nevertheless, we must use our intellect to think, not paranoia and denial mechanisms.

  • You been reading again, huh?

  • Do you understand how clouds are formed?

  • Great Quality.....

  • It always freaks you out when you see other planes suddenly appear next to you when your flying.

  • It's a British Airways' 777 the above plane?

  • No a United 767-300

  • ur right

  • How fast do you think that planes traveling?

  • definately a 777-200 United Airlines you can tell by the engines!

  • thats a B767-300

  • whats wrong with you asshole?

  • Nothing ya dumb bitch

  • Oh ive seen your profile before. So your a terrorist eh? C'mon, your not impressing anyone man! Get a life and stop annoying people on Youtube by pretending to be a terrorist.

  • Trying to keep the world safe! From what? Fags like you on Youtube are possibly the saddest people in the world. Your idle threats dont mean a thing to anybody!

  • You truly are a stupid piece of shit. Rather than try to argue with a fucking idiot, I'll leave. STupid fags like you ruin this place.

  • Look man, im not the one pretending to be a terrorist and slagging off peoples videos

  • If you're trying to make yourself look like something that crawled out from under a rock, you've done a great job.

    Calling people names only makes YOU look like dirt.

  • ahhh look at the chemtrails!!! they're poisoning us!!! We're all gonna die!!!

  • 767 =)

    if it was 777 the engines would have it going mach 625642356.4 and have 58366325 ft flames coming out the back

  • in other words GE90 engines are epic

  • that is a 767 definetly, where you coming from? how many flight hours are from where you coming?

  • 767-300 i think

  • That's definately a B777-200 :)

  • a 777 should have bigger engines tha  this i think its a 767

  • wingspan on this plane is far greater than on a 767.

  • too short for a 777, definetly a 767

  • ok.

  • no its a 777 can tell by the wing span

  • Yes, Boeing 777 Man, you are right!

  • faster than my dick going in-and-out of your moms loose pussy

  • haha that's funny but unappropiate to say...be nicer next time

  • In km/h ground speed, should be around 800-900km/h. Indicated airspeed (relative to the air density), however may only be 250knots, around 463km/h. All in all, commercial planes using travel at mach 0.75-0.82, which is 75-82% of the speed of sound in air at that altitude.

  • 767

  • Around 22 seconds, I think you can see the raked wingtips the B777 has, though Im not entirely sure either

  • whats that white thing? oil dump? but than again so many airline does that? isnt it a waste

  • Oil dump? Erm.. I'm sure aircrafts don't dump oil.. Oil is used for hydraulics and engine cooling. You don't want to sit in a plane that has no hydraulics for controls. You might mean fuel dump, but no, not in this case. The 'white' things are contrails, condensation of hot gases from the engine (water vapour).

  • It's condensation. When the hot air from the engines mixes with the cold air (probably about -40°C), thats what you get.

  • its a contrail dumbass

  • strange when planes fly past you the oposit way , they look 10 times faster lol !!!

  • it's actually only 2 times faster= =

  • <