that is how it is in motorsports...... red bull did the same thing this season 2011... why do you think FIA relieve team order restriction....cuz all the great teams do it
The difference between Mclaren ( Mr Ron Dennis) and Ferrari, is that mcLaren swaped because they kept their word before the championship started : the pole man will win and we have to preverse reliability. When Schumacher lied publicly , playing sorry while in the first time he was very happy. McLaren did it without lies & at least gave same support to drivers, not the case of Ferrari & the bunch of cheaters .
Actually the team had nothing to do with this, Coulthard just let Mika pass cause he led almost every single lap of the race and lost the lead to David cause the pit crew screwed up his last stop. Just show the respect between them... and on a side note McLaren dominated that race.. they lapped every single car on the track, the only team in the history of F1 to do so.
ferrarista.eso no es el final de una carrera!!!! no manches a McLaren!!! si tenemos que subir videos de las veces q barrichello dejo pasar a schumacher, hariamos 10 dvds llenos!! la imagenes no se borraran y el gp de austria del 2002 es la verguenza de la historia de la f1!!!
ferrari YO TE GANE UN CAMPEONATO EN LA ULTIMA CURVA!!!
They all do it all the time, personally I don't see anything wrong with anyone doing it, it makes sense if one driver can win the champion ship and the other cant.
this is completely different from ferrari. this was to do with an agreement coulthard and hakkinen both made, which also stretched back to jerez 97 i believe. the thing in austria in 2001 and 2002 though was simply team orders and the latter was completely unnecessary and took the piss. i'm not a big fan of results being influenced like this though but this incident is more acceptable than the ferraris of 2001, 2002 and 2010!
@SCD999 It's the same thing whether its for the championship or not. The audience want to see the fastest driver win, not the outcome of a deal between drivers or teams.
@beaujones1 Don't get me wrong, I completely agree. I just think an agreement is a sort of 'lesser of two evils' when compared to robbing a guy of a win on the anniversary of the GP he nearly lost his career just for the championship.
i think the difference with mclaren and ferrari is that mclaren will ask for is he willing to let him pass you but ferrari just told to let him pass you. but of course i may be wrong who know what they do exactly over there :)
@jlbergqvist that's what i think, too. It's all about money in motorsport, and a few points more can make a team win a championship, that means lot of money.
Well, the 1998 Australian GP saw a totally different story than the 2002 Austrian GP. The McLaren drivers made a pact : the one who reached turn 1 in first position would get the victory, to not have a potentionally dangerous battle. Hakkinen reached T1 in first position, but had to stop one more time than Coulthard because of an error of his team. So McLaren asked Coulthard to let Hakkinen pass at the finish.
I'm not defending them though, as I never liked this kind of pacts.
that is how it is in motorsports...... red bull did the same thing this season 2011... why do you think FIA relieve team order restriction....cuz all the great teams do it
brianzone 4 months ago
The difference between Mclaren ( Mr Ron Dennis) and Ferrari, is that mcLaren swaped because they kept their word before the championship started : the pole man will win and we have to preverse reliability. When Schumacher lied publicly , playing sorry while in the first time he was very happy. McLaren did it without lies & at least gave same support to drivers, not the case of Ferrari & the bunch of cheaters .
GTAGIS 4 months ago
hahah..this uploader is "funny"
feverNpain999 5 months ago
Atleast McLaren only did it once, Ferrari did it a million times.
Darkapprentice71 5 months ago
Actually the team had nothing to do with this, Coulthard just let Mika pass cause he led almost every single lap of the race and lost the lead to David cause the pit crew screwed up his last stop. Just show the respect between them... and on a side note McLaren dominated that race.. they lapped every single car on the track, the only team in the history of F1 to do so.
Haippitus 7 months ago
ferrarista.eso no es el final de una carrera!!!! no manches a McLaren!!! si tenemos que subir videos de las veces q barrichello dejo pasar a schumacher, hariamos 10 dvds llenos!! la imagenes no se borraran y el gp de austria del 2002 es la verguenza de la historia de la f1!!!
ferrari YO TE GANE UN CAMPEONATO EN LA ULTIMA CURVA!!!
GO McLAREN!!!
ovejapreta 7 months ago
*championship
Jedontrack 8 months ago
They all do it all the time, personally I don't see anything wrong with anyone doing it, it makes sense if one driver can win the champion ship and the other cant.
Jedontrack 8 months ago
Yeah, McLaren did this once what about Ferrari?
S3hnsuch7 8 months ago
when did this happen again... and was it on the last lap where the finish was all but gauranteed... right... case in point
CDUB8989 8 months ago
illustrative of his career; Coulthard was not a real winner.
TheSCF1908 11 months ago
this is completely different from ferrari. this was to do with an agreement coulthard and hakkinen both made, which also stretched back to jerez 97 i believe. the thing in austria in 2001 and 2002 though was simply team orders and the latter was completely unnecessary and took the piss. i'm not a big fan of results being influenced like this though but this incident is more acceptable than the ferraris of 2001, 2002 and 2010!
SCD999 1 year ago
@SCD999 no is the same thing....
MrSchumithebest1 1 year ago
@SCD999 It's the same thing whether its for the championship or not. The audience want to see the fastest driver win, not the outcome of a deal between drivers or teams.
beaujones1 8 months ago
@beaujones1 Don't get me wrong, I completely agree. I just think an agreement is a sort of 'lesser of two evils' when compared to robbing a guy of a win on the anniversary of the GP he nearly lost his career just for the championship.
SCD999 8 months ago
i think the difference with mclaren and ferrari is that mclaren will ask for is he willing to let him pass you but ferrari just told to let him pass you. but of course i may be wrong who know what they do exactly over there :)
athe86 1 year ago
@athe86 aye what f1 driver would be willing to give up the lead against their nearest rival. stop being a dick
cfcnlr 7 months ago
It happens in every form of motorsport. Get over it.
jlbergqvist 1 year ago
@jlbergqvist that's what i think, too. It's all about money in motorsport, and a few points more can make a team win a championship, that means lot of money.
darkspugna92 1 year ago
lol annoyed ferrari fan who uploaded this
beyblader10171 1 year ago 11
haha mclaren stallorder
Grisu94x 1 year ago
Well, the 1998 Australian GP saw a totally different story than the 2002 Austrian GP. The McLaren drivers made a pact : the one who reached turn 1 in first position would get the victory, to not have a potentionally dangerous battle. Hakkinen reached T1 in first position, but had to stop one more time than Coulthard because of an error of his team. So McLaren asked Coulthard to let Hakkinen pass at the finish.
I'm not defending them though, as I never liked this kind of pacts.
GreyBull88 2 years ago 4
@GreyBull88 Uhm yeah, you actually believed that story? Come on now.
robelp91 1 year ago