Carbon is not a pollutant, what the fuck do plants use? Carbon trading is a SCAM why is it that the MARKET place is so important? Because there are so many financiers scamming to start trading at huge profits! Again an example of paper money being made with no actual physical gain
The Federal Trade Commission today stepped up its ongoing campaign against scammers who falsely promise guaranteed jobs and opportunities to “be your own boss” to consumers who are struggling with unemployment and diminished incomes as a consequence of the economic downturn. “Operation Empty Promises,” a multi-agency law enforcement initiative today announced more than 90 enforcement actions including FHTM.
By 2012, large companies will have a limit on how much pollution they can emit and this will be measured using Carbon Credits. Companies who use more than their allotted credits in 1 year will be subject to substantial fines
contact marvinroyston@gmail.com for brochures to buy credits
I feel that as long as we feel guilty for farting carbon, the earth will respect this and self-regulate back to climatic equilibrium. Al Gore sets the standard: because of his huge guilt, he gets to have a HUGE carbon footprint, and its OK. Our Mother respects his guilt. This is good.
When did they rewrite the science textbooks? Carbon is not a pollutant - especially not the carbon dioxide that's being blamed for global warming/climate change. Plants need it to live. Cut carbon dioxide and you'll likely get more desert areas. Talk about global warming...
True, Carbon is not a pollutant under normal circumstances. The purpose of carbon credits/ carbon cap and trade is to control the amounts being released by man. Not to remove all CO2 from earth.
We only produce 3-4% of all the CO2. Please explain how reducing what we produce is going to make a difference (they have admitted it won't prevent supposed global warming)
"The purpose of carbon credits/ carbon cap and trade is to control the amounts being released by man"
The only thing cap and trade will do is make people like Al Gore richer. Those with low incomes, of necessity, have always kept their carbon footprint down. So who is adding all this CO2? Do you suppose Mr. I-grew-up-in-Hawaii is going to lower his thermostat? Do you suppose the White House A/C is kept at 78 in the summer and 68 in the winter?
The Carbon Cap and Trade is focused toward large corporations. Not the average person. A carbon tax on the other hand would be aimed at the average person, like extra tax on gasoline. The average person will need to cut back in our consumption just like the very rich. We as a species are not living sustainable.
sunnus-"The average person will need to cut back in our consumption just like the very rich"
I'm not talking "average" - I'm talking about people who already have the thermostat set at levels that endanger their health because they can't afford higher heat/AC bills. "Mr. I-grew-up-in-Hawaii" (Obama) is not going to lower his thermostat and neither is Al Gore. We only produce 3-4% of all the CO2 and the gw promoters have admitted that lowering it will not change "global warming"
It would only make some people rich (Al Gore, et al) and it would increase costs for the rest of us. It's also very unnecesary; we've come a long way since the 70's.
There is a difference of opinions because many people follow the words of others without thinking for themselves. The globe is warming up, but man is not to blame. Most people claim that our CO2 emmissions are causing the increase in temperature, but what Al Gore, and others that make this claim don't tell you is that temperature is changing before CO2 levels. Our ocean heats up and releases CO2. However, scientists don't know for sure what causes the initial temperature increase.
There is a difference of opinions because many people follow the words of others without thinking for themselves. The globe is warming up, but man is not to blame. Most people claim that our CO2 emmissions are causing the increase in temperature, but what Al Gore, and others that make this claim don't tell you is that temperature is changing before CO2 levels. Our ocean heats up and releases CO2. However, scientists don't know for sure what causes the initial temperature increase.
There is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane or other greenhouse gases is causing or will in the foreseeable future cause catastrophic heating of the Earths atmosphere and disruption of the Earths climate, states the petition. In fact, there is substantial evidence that increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide produces many beneficial effects.
More than 31,000 U.S. scientists, including more than 9,000 Ph.D.s (in fields such as atmospheric science, climatology, Earth science, environment and dozens of other specialties) have signed a petition rejecting global warming, the U.N.s assumption that human production of greenhouse gases is damaging Earths climate. This is 15 times more scientists than are supporting the U.N. campaign.
daku kaayo nga problema sa palibot...especially sa atong environment!!!
thegreatsky2011 1 month ago
nice video.. interesting...
thegreeensky 2 months ago
Carbon is not a pollutant, what the fuck do plants use? Carbon trading is a SCAM why is it that the MARKET place is so important? Because there are so many financiers scamming to start trading at huge profits! Again an example of paper money being made with no actual physical gain
unreal22000 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The Federal Trade Commission today stepped up its ongoing campaign against scammers who falsely promise guaranteed jobs and opportunities to “be your own boss” to consumers who are struggling with unemployment and diminished incomes as a consequence of the economic downturn. “Operation Empty Promises,” a multi-agency law enforcement initiative today announced more than 90 enforcement actions including FHTM.
divabikinis 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
By 2012, large companies will have a limit on how much pollution they can emit and this will be measured using Carbon Credits. Companies who use more than their allotted credits in 1 year will be subject to substantial fines
contact marvinroyston@gmail.com for brochures to buy credits
marvinroyston 1 year ago
I feel that as long as we feel guilty for farting carbon, the earth will respect this and self-regulate back to climatic equilibrium. Al Gore sets the standard: because of his huge guilt, he gets to have a HUGE carbon footprint, and its OK. Our Mother respects his guilt. This is good.
TheCannonofMohammed 1 year ago
Carbon Credits = Catholic 'Indulgences'
Work this scam out.
Ontologistics 2 years ago
Comment removed
ingga10 2 years ago
Chemtrails + Mind Control = Climate Change
Beliefs are what is being changed, your TV is designing your idea of Climate change - globally.
Please Google Chemtrails then sign the petition on my channel. Check out the footage of covert aerosol programs (shot in Sydney Aust).
Throw out your TV. Stop going to Uni.
philwarinsky 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
To learn more about WORLDBANK plans/Climate Change =
google search YouTube video :
"PROTEST-Indigenous Peoples "2nd MAY REVOLT" at the UN"
humanrightstruth 3 years ago
When did they rewrite the science textbooks? Carbon is not a pollutant - especially not the carbon dioxide that's being blamed for global warming/climate change. Plants need it to live. Cut carbon dioxide and you'll likely get more desert areas. Talk about global warming...
anonymous915 3 years ago
True, Carbon is not a pollutant under normal circumstances. The purpose of carbon credits/ carbon cap and trade is to control the amounts being released by man. Not to remove all CO2 from earth.
sunnus 2 years ago
We only produce 3-4% of all the CO2. Please explain how reducing what we produce is going to make a difference (they have admitted it won't prevent supposed global warming)
anonymous915 2 years ago
"The purpose of carbon credits/ carbon cap and trade is to control the amounts being released by man"
The only thing cap and trade will do is make people like Al Gore richer. Those with low incomes, of necessity, have always kept their carbon footprint down. So who is adding all this CO2? Do you suppose Mr. I-grew-up-in-Hawaii is going to lower his thermostat? Do you suppose the White House A/C is kept at 78 in the summer and 68 in the winter?
anonymous915 2 years ago
The Carbon Cap and Trade is focused toward large corporations. Not the average person. A carbon tax on the other hand would be aimed at the average person, like extra tax on gasoline. The average person will need to cut back in our consumption just like the very rich. We as a species are not living sustainable.
sunnus 2 years ago
You are very naive if you think they won't pass on the expense to their customers.
anonymous915 2 years ago
sunnus-"The average person will need to cut back in our consumption just like the very rich"
I'm not talking "average" - I'm talking about people who already have the thermostat set at levels that endanger their health because they can't afford higher heat/AC bills. "Mr. I-grew-up-in-Hawaii" (Obama) is not going to lower his thermostat and neither is Al Gore. We only produce 3-4% of all the CO2 and the gw promoters have admitted that lowering it will not change "global warming"
anonymous915 2 years ago
What do you think of an entire new trade on all types of pollutants ? Capping industries on all types of harmful waste.
sunnus 2 years ago
It would only make some people rich (Al Gore, et al) and it would increase costs for the rest of us. It's also very unnecesary; we've come a long way since the 70's.
anonymous915 2 years ago
I thought I'd post this to add to the debate.
What is going on?
Is global warming true or false?
Why is there so much difference of opinions
steveascension 3 years ago
There is a difference of opinions because many people follow the words of others without thinking for themselves. The globe is warming up, but man is not to blame. Most people claim that our CO2 emmissions are causing the increase in temperature, but what Al Gore, and others that make this claim don't tell you is that temperature is changing before CO2 levels. Our ocean heats up and releases CO2. However, scientists don't know for sure what causes the initial temperature increase.
steveascension 3 years ago
There is a difference of opinions because many people follow the words of others without thinking for themselves. The globe is warming up, but man is not to blame. Most people claim that our CO2 emmissions are causing the increase in temperature, but what Al Gore, and others that make this claim don't tell you is that temperature is changing before CO2 levels. Our ocean heats up and releases CO2. However, scientists don't know for sure what causes the initial temperature increase.
steveascension 3 years ago
There is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane or other greenhouse gases is causing or will in the foreseeable future cause catastrophic heating of the Earths atmosphere and disruption of the Earths climate, states the petition. In fact, there is substantial evidence that increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide produces many beneficial effects.
steveascension 3 years ago
Green, Not Gullible
More than 31,000 U.S. scientists, including more than 9,000 Ph.D.s (in fields such as atmospheric science, climatology, Earth science, environment and dozens of other specialties) have signed a petition rejecting global warming, the U.N.s assumption that human production of greenhouse gases is damaging Earths climate. This is 15 times more scientists than are supporting the U.N. campaign.
steveascension 3 years ago
Corporations making us pay for the air we breath, we all knew they would find a way one day.
Drexxle 3 years ago