@TheSentienthuman GO FUCK YOURSELF SMALL MINDED IMP. PEOPLE LIKE YOU MAKE ME ASHAMED TO BE HUMAN!!!! Take your ZERO subscribers (successful, arent you) and FUCK OFF
@cveitch a lot off love in that statement chas, so are we to believe your love is only conditional to those sheep that follow you? perhaps matey isn't concerned about subscribers like you are
@cveitch a lot off love in that statement chas, so are we to believe your love is only conditional to those sheep that follow you? perhaps matey isn't concerned about subscribers like you are
@cveitch a lot off love in that statement chas, so are we to believe your love is only conditional to those sheep that follow you? perhaps matey isn't concerned about subscribers like you are
@cveitch a lot off love in that statement chas, so are we to believe your love is only conditional to those sheep that follow you? perhaps matey isn't concerned about subscribers like you are
Anyone who still believes the oficial story is a moron who can't connect the dots: hundreds of witnesses to explosions before and after the planes hit, 3 buildings that collapses exactly like controlled demolitions, findings of military explosivs in all dust samples. Those towers were blown up, thus it was an inside job. BTW, Charlie Veitch is a shill and a sell out.
People act like members of the human race wouldn't risk their job/ life in exchange for fame/money? Most would do it out of the goodness of their hearts I'm sure anyway.
Unless over 50,000 professional experts people are Lying/Retarded, I think it's safe the say the conspiracies are bullshit.
If I worked for any of those agencies and I was told to falsify data, I would go to the Times, the NY Times would then make a huge deal out of it like the media does with everything, they would pay me money,I would get interview deals, book deals, it would be bigger news than anything. The Times would get rich...........................Nope, everyone is scared (for some reason) lol You calling all of those people pussies? Are you saying they don't like over night fame/money? ...Are they robots?
@punxsutawneybarney The list of experts doesn't mean anything without the peer reviewed papers to back up the claims though, that's how you know legitimize your work (AE911 can't even get that process done legitimately). I have a list of 50 peer reviewed papers, would you like to see, or are they all "shills" hahha
@punxsutawneybarney 'NIST says the "extensive damage" had nothing to do with the initiation of the collapse of Building 7'
Exactly.
If I untwist a jar cap, then I pop it off easily with my thumb, me popping it off is what initiated the cap flinging off , however, I could not have made the cap fling off unless the cap was untwisted before hand. Get it?
Plus the damage was only really seen on one side where the debris smacked it, but there were internal fires on 20 floors unfought for 7 hours
Oh but I forgot about architects! Architecture is a bachelor of 'Arts', not science. Their opinion on buildings falling is JUST as valid as mine or yours (common you-tubers).
I have found out the exact number of Structural Engineers in AE911........3.
I have a list of over 600+ Structural Engineers who have written peer reviewed papers supporting global collapse. Epic fail for twoofers.
AE911 even have Software Engineers and Landscape Engineers. Basically? I'll listen to the structural engineers when it comes to 911, thank you, you twoofers can listen to the dudes that cut your grass and make your computer programs.
@theBartone9119 There are at least 40 structural engineers in AE911Truth. Software Engineers are not included as engineers. I don't know what a Landscape Engineer is.
@punxsutawneybarney "40 structural engineers in AE911Truth." Like I said, I just skimmed through the list quickly and only found 9, I'll take your word for it though. There was one Software Engineer and 2 Landscape Engineers (made up title) on the list. I only found 3 peer reviewed papers by AE911.
I have a list of over 600 civil engineers, most of them are structural engineers, so I'd say at least 400 structural engineers who support global collapse, plus a list of 50 peer reviewed papers.
@theBartone9119 Regina Naeckel is a licensed engineer, a graduate of the Technische Univerisaet Berlin. She is the only Landscape and Environmental Engineer on the list.
You claim to have 600 civil engineers who support global collapse. I would sure like to see your list. I've seen at most 25 names supporting the official reports, and for all of them their impartiality is tainted by contracts, associations, awards, appointments, or work for NIST.
@punxsutawneybarney "tainted by contracts" How are they tainted? They signed a contract to investigate the collapse of the WTC, are you implying these people are "in on it" to falsify data and not tell the truth?! Lol Moron.
I can't post links on you-tube comments, but i can copy and paste the list, their credentials shit on your AE911 shills
@punxsutawneybarney If you want you can copy and paste each name into google, and check up on their investigative work on 911 if you don't believe me or the site. All it takes is research, you don't have to believe anybody lol
@punxsutawneybarney Bonnie Manley, P.E., S.E. / Boris Hayda, P.E., S.E. / Brian Lyons, Tully / Brian McElhatten, S.E. / Brian Smith (Col.), Chief Deputy Medical Examiner, Dover AFB / Brian Tokarczik, P.E., S.E. / Charles Hirsch, M.D. / Charles J. Carter, P.E., S.E. / Charles Thornton, P.E. / Charlie Vitchers / Christoph Hoffmann, Ph.D., Purdue University / Christopher E. Marrion, P.E. / Christopher M. Hewitt, AISC / Christopher N. McCowan / Chuck Guardia, S.E. / Conrad Paulson, P.E., S.E. /
@punxsutawneybarney I looked through the list and found 3 , then I was told it was 9 by someone else, now you say 40, either way the number isn't too high. I can find more relevant experts that believe in big foot lol
Yo everybody, i made a techno song of Charlie veitch feat clinton,obama and bush called "good boy gone bad". Check it out,if enough people like i will make more songs before BBC release their hit piece! watch?v=KxFq3diZ-VI
Richard Gage will not make much money from his 911 work, it involves a lot of work, a lot of time and a lot of travel and a lot of danger and aggravation
As a professional he takes time out of his working day to pursue this matter as a public service.
The issue of being Jewish is not only about making money but about protecting Israel. Sadly Israel played a leading role in this sordid affair
This is all about punishing the guilty and absolving the innocent. I hate 'set ups' and 'frame ups
Richard Gage quit his job, because he makes 100,000 a year going to foreign countries and making up stories about 9/11.
how much work is that ? how much work is it to keep a website up? Not much. your making it out as if gage builds houses or roads as if he actually did work.
i only added you because of the Richard Gage cambridge gig, now i realise that you are a mole. You remind me of Sayanim ( Jewish insiders ) such as the Naudet Brothers, Baron Cohen etc
Your interview was very weak, my opinion is that you were a mole in the first place designed to " see the truth' later
@taledarkside Veitch may well be a Syanim ( Israeli agent )who went undercover in the 'truth movement' with a few well publicized arrests in order to emerge years later during an all expenses paid BBC documentary as suddenly having 'grown up' and seen the 'error of his ways' This is important as we are about to reach the tenth anniversary of 9/11 and the perps want to pre empt any fresh public interest in this matter. Hence the new BBC mockumentary called 9/11 Road Trip
Respond to this video... Richard Gage is an outstanding man and No I did not know he was Jewish, Never read that or heard that. I myself have a Jewish father but I am certainly not a Veitch. The issue is not what Veitch looks like but his peculiar conversion to coincide with the tenth anniversary and his BBC all expenses paid holiday. I accuse Veitch of being an agent and taking part in a scripted plan, The issue of being Jewish is that Jews have most to gain from the perpetuation of
Respond to this video... the 9/11 .' Muslims did it ' myth
911 was a crime against humanity and very much an unsolved crime. The people blamed for doing it were media creations , Therefore until we get justice and get the international criminal cartel behind bars ( or preferably executed) this remains an unsolved crime
Original message from PiknSave (4/7/11) - I went to Westminster Magistrates Court this morning to speak to Mr Veitch about his Damascus conversion. At 10am I went inside and inspected the boards for all 8 courts. Guess what....no case against Mr Veitch was listed. It would appear that Bilderberg & the elites have fixed it for their puppet & set him up with a shitey media career. So ends the enigma that was the Love Police. Sold out for 30 pieces. As Veitch himself used to shout: Shame on you!
Building 7 was no mystery either. Reporters were told at 2pm it would collapse. The firefighters couldn't contain the inferno,and they heard loud groaning, things were dripping/falling, and the ceilings were sagging in, so they didn't even want to fight the fire, they warned everyone right away that Building 7 was coming down next. Firefighters said they've never seen anything like it
/watch?v=WnYBX6QT0R4
This woman says "I just got word, Building 7 is next"
The Inward bowing probably ripped the support out, making everything else come crashing down quickly, and gravity accumulated the progressive mass. Gage acts like the buildings didn't even have floors when he did his silly box "demonstration" **Face Palm**. Plus the core of the South Tower was still standing for a few seconds after the collapse, you would think a controlled demolition would have taken that out as the collapse was initiating...
Universal collapse from inward bowing is what happened(Rough calculations but point is simple).It wasn't 10% crushing 90% obviously, it was 10% crushing the bottom 1% (floor), then the total mass= 11%, that 11% then crushed another 1% (floor), then that total mass =12% in a PROGRESSIVE manner until it reached the ground. Everything else just got taken out along the way down as the floors were being pulverized. You need to stop watching Richard Gage play with boxes (boxes don't have floors).
your all so funny making statements as though you are scientists lol... do u think u are the first to become critics of richard gage...? u are missing the point too... there is no way the planes could have brought down the buildings they were built to with stand multi hits from planes, even earth quakes don't turn buildings to dust... building 7 was a bunker lol...!!! and it just fell down?? lol...
@dude7777777100 No it didnt just "fall down" it had extensive damage to the back of the building. 9/11 documentaries also fail to show the START of the building collapsing... they edit out the east penthouse collapsing which means it took 15 seconds to collapse, NOT 7. I'm not criticising richard gage - I'm as critical of America as much as the next hardcore liberal, but the evidence presented for 9/11 is circumstantial, false or just doesn't prove shit
@aiiiunluckykid NIST says the "extensive damage" had nothing to do with the initiation of the collapse of Building 7. FEMA said the same thing. Damage all on one side should have generated asymmetrical toppling forces and clearly did not.
Richard Gage's salary in 2009 from Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth. That's according to the 2009 Form 990-EZ available right now at GuidestarDOTorg, an online organization that helps track non-profits.
The total revenue for 2009 -- 344,570. Salaries for Gage and others topped out at 107,417. That means salaries constitute 31% of AE911Truth's expenses.
In other words, Richard Gage's salary is 21% of all revenue received by AE911Truth in 2009.
@allegorians i dont see how it is ignorant thinking. ofcourse it has to be reviewed by other scientists - and no not necessarily NIST or the 9/11 commission, and even if it was so what?? That argument just assumes theres a shitload of people in on it which makes me even more skeptical. The buildings didnt even collapse in 10 seconds either, as so many of these documentaries claim, it was more like 20 secs, but they show you from an obscure angle that misrepresents that.
Harrit et al found nano-thermite and there is simply no benign reason for the appearance of nano-thermite in the WTC dust. A new investigation is needed.
It's unlikely such a low perdentage would even be detactable, and certainly wouldnt account for USGS dust samples showing as much as 5.4 sulfur.
Finally, before claiming to have found the chemical signature of thermate in a sample, a reasonable scientist would ensure that all of the elements of thermate are present, and this is where Harrit's thermate claim completely, utterly falls apart.
so did you film what that guy said?? its past the date now and I'm interested what he said? have a link or something ? anyway you're an awesome guy that think for himself.. problem is there's too many sheep around here..
This building represents the sumerian god's use of an omphalos,these were said to whisper voices to and fro from earth to the planet of the Annunaki,We today would call it a communication device such as a cb radio etc. it's typical that elites would use this symbol in their architecture.So just a little history for you.
The American Society of Civil Engineers has about 120,000 members who all confirm the National Institute of Standard and Technology report. Implosion World (#1 website for controlled demo's) wrote a paper saying that there were no signs of a CD on 911. And the chemicals found in thermate are simple and could me found in many things in regular debris (sulfur is found everywhere for example). Gage simply selectively picked a few of the many chemicals found to prove "thermate" lol Wake up people!
@kushsmokkeralt Welcome to 2009, read the paper "Active thermitic material discovered in 9/11dust.." written by prof.N.Harrit. They didn't found just chemical traces. They found the energetic material itself (red/grey chips), which has thermitic properties.Please update your info.
@Lietuvispartizan Welcome to 2011.In deed, the presence of iron, sulfure, aluminum, potassium, maganese,fluorine, and titanium in the WTC dust are all supported by USGS dust samples, and most are engredients of thermate. However the first thing any reasonable scientist would investigate is whether or not there are any natural (non-thermate related) sources for these chemicals.
@Lietuvispartizan The third most common ingredient in the World Trade Center construction was gypsum-based drywall, which is 18.62 sulfur. Iron is used in paint and electronic devices. Potassium is used in concrete. Manganese was used for structural steel, paint, batteries, and ceramics. Flourine is used in Freon. 200,000 pounds of Freon cooled the WTC complex.This was the largest air-conditioning system in the country.
@Lietuvispartizan Titanium is used in paper and paint (both common at the WTC) and made up 2% of each of the 767's. WTC7 was also clad in polished steel and titanium. To claim that these were uncommon at the WTC,and that the only explanation for their presence is though the use of thermate, is an unbelievable joke.The next thing any reasonable scientist would do is check that the elements are present in their correct, signature quantities.
@Lietuvispartizan According to A&E for truth , "about 1,000 pounds od explosives would be sufficient [per tower]". For both towers and WTC7, this would equal about 3,000 pounds of thermate. Thermate is 2% sulfur. This calculates out to about 60 pounds of sulfur. Approximately 1 million tons (2 billion pounds) of dust blanketed lower Manhatton. Based on Professor Jones' estimates, a thermite reaction would cause the WTC dust to be approximately 0.000003% sulfur.
@Lietuvispartizan The two main byproducts of thermate are aluminum oxide (41%) and barium nitrate (29%). Both are unique to thermate and would have no reason for being found at the WTC - except through the use of thermate. However, neither of the USGS nor Harrit himself report finding any traces of either of these elements . Harrit points to traces of aluminum, but there is a world of a difference between aluminum and aluminum oxide (which has 3 oxygen atoms)
@Lietuvispartizan So there's STILL no solid proof of themite/mate, and on a final note: No building has EVER been demolished using thermite/thermate in mankind's history, because it wouldn't be an efficient method of controlled demoliton by any stretch of the imagination. This is confirmed by Ron Craig (controlled demoltion expert from Toronto) and many other experts. "Taking down a building with thermite/thermate is like getting drunk off mouthwash when you have have champagne" .Please update.
@kushsmokkeralt sulfure, potassium, maganese, fluorine, titanium..? There are no S, K, F, Ti elements in the red/grey chips. Obviously you haven’t read the “Active thermitic material” paper. You just watched a video, which was very poorly done. I’m certain that the author of that video, who also hasn't read the paper, b/c in the 2 part he talked about the elements (sulfur, titanium, barium) which weren't found in the red/grey chips...
apparently some shills claim the "plane" hit with so much force that the steel structured tower didn't stand a chance and that the momentum created was enough to allow the hollow nose cone to rip through intact,still have enough momentum for the fuel filled wings to slice through intact and still have enough momentum for the tail-section to slice through intact and then we see the nose cone emerge out of the other side intact.
Went to see this lecture today with my girlfriend - was pretty eye opening and full of awesomeness. Wanted to stay around afterwards but was parked illegally so wanted to get back. Make sure you post a video if anything else like this is coming up as that's the only way i'll hear about it!
Charlie, Richard Gage is an clever kind couragous man, who is devoting his life to uncovering the truth of the real perpetrators of 9/11. If you haven't yet watched his presentation AE911 Truth, please avail yourself of it, the facts are undeniable. I would encourage any and all to do likewise. Peace.
lmao. Big charlie just blanks that suited dipshit. I have a lot of love for you, charlie. Brush em off like the insects they currently are. (Maybe on eday they'll be butterflies but i highly fuckin doubt it. :D
@taledarkside yeah, the wall was ready to collapse right, there. next time your standfing on a kerb im calling the police, you deranged fool. (If you were bein sarcastic I apologise, I hope you were) x
I'm American and I'm with you 100% my friend. I'm mad as hell with this government making the rest of the world hate Americans. I consider my self to be awake not a part of any nationality nor religion.
check out the images of the double decker said to have been blown apart by "terrorists" on 7/7.....you can clearly see for yourself where (front upper deck) the "real" perps have tried to remove the roof with of all things....a circular saw / angle grinder.
@kansasinnovember IF YOU WATCH 77 RIPPLE , he may have been an unsuspecting victim in helping mi5 and 6 setting up the false flag operation. because of his skill as an electrician, and so he was murdered.. lets hope his killers suffer nightmares from it..
@kansasinnovember He was an illegal immigrant, now stop being on the side of those and support your country otherwise get out we dont need any more traitors here,
@kansasinnovember It has everything to do with it, im fed up of illegal immigrants coming to my country hiding in lorries and crawling in containers then stealing our tax cash, I have no sympathy for them they need to be rounded up and removed.
@Jimmyretired explain exactly what you mean when you say JC De Menezes being shot 7 times in the head has "everything" to do with his immigration status ?
@Jimmyretired if you have a problem with illegal immigrants wouldn't you be better off venting your frustrations on a video link directly concerns that very issue..
@kansasinnovember the aluminum was common through it's use in the WTC's facade, the 767's, and vehicles. The presence of these elements (in quantities consistant with the only with their natural use throughout the WTC complex), doesn't in any way support the use of thermate, and the lack of aluminum oxide and barium nitrate thoroughly disproves it.
why did the then aussie prime minister John Howard make a statement regarding the london "bombings" of 7/7 on the 8th july at 8 am (gmt) stating that the "bombings" had claimed the lives of 52 people,when at the same time the police,rescue workers and forensics had only accounted for 37 "bodies". he even beat the BBC to the final figure by an amazing 3 days...
...foreknowledge of the event or just a damn good guess.
could someone explain how the engine planted..i mean found on murray street landed where it did without knocking down any of the surrounding scaffolding...and how long have CFM56 engines been used on 767's
911 was not an inside job, the terrorists made building 7 that was not even hit by a plane fall down with the power of their minds! Remember that the majority is always right, Nazi Germany-Majority,slavery-majority,womens rights- supported by minority! The shape of the earth was said to be circular and the guy who said it was condemned, keep it up majority you are on to a winner. Justin bieber is a king
@chavspotter If it had a 20 story gash which I am sure it didnt but even if it did then the building would have collapsed at that damage spot and fall over.. Not straight down in its footprint with 0 resistance.
@chavspotter straight down, you silly boy. IF it had a 20 story gash in the south side, dont you think it may have fell to the ones side? come on, you gotta try THINKIN sometime, its good for the soul :)
@taledarkside im gonna pretend u never typed that. Yes, gravity pull straight down, but not when theres resistance, you monkey. In your world if I put my kid on a chute where there is resistance he'll slide straight down thru the metal and into he ground, not at an angle?. You have heard of 'matter', yes? solidity? your standing on it right now, and your not falling. Amazing. Its called resistance. :D
@taledarkside lmao. what your standing on is SOLID, therefor it resists gravity or we'd all br freefalling forever u dipshit. A building cannot fall in freefall with no resistance. drop a rock on your foot and see if it hits it or floats thru it you clown. Ie: resistance. ;)
Not sure what you are trying to prove exactly? Even without looking at the physics you can just see that a fire wouldn't have caused that kind of spontaneous collapse. Glad you are looking into the evidence though, that's always good :)
Actually I do have an Alevel in Physics and newtons first law just states that 0 movement (velocity) just shows there is an equalibrium of force! Please explain to us all what REALLY happened then as you seem to be an expert on 9/11
@taledarkside "newtons first law talks about standing on the planet earth or on a floor". LOL Does it? A university degree? OK then. LOL. To make statements like that then to say you have a degree is hilarious. You twat. Heres a question for you, can you stand on water? Should be fairly easy for someone of your knowledge.
@taledarkside I know newtons 1st law very well and it says nothing about standing on planet earth or a floor. lol. Do you realise how stupid you look to say this followed by the claim of a uni degree? And "resistance" is a term that can be applied in different ways. To quote you " it's "resistance" " (which actually means "it is resistance" because of the aposrophe and makes no grammatical sense what so ever, further emphasising your stupidity.) implies electrical resistance which is different
@taledarkside LOL. your understanding of basic english lets you down. My comment to you was to provoke thought. You are thinking, but it seems you dont understand what I was saying. To quote "that means according to you, standing on the earth, you will slowly sink into the middle of the earth". No, you dimwit, cant you see it is you who is actually saying that? OK. Here is a chance to redeem yourself, If I have an old wooden table and continue to put bricks on top of it what will happen and why?
"I know newtons 1st law very well and it says nothing about standing on planet earth or a floor"
then you should post up all the mathematical equations that applies to Newtons first theory of motion. Since you know it so well. And I expect it to be in Calculus form
@taledarkside (cont) from talking about a materials resistance to a force i.e gravity. And since you say "it's resistance" as opposed to "its electrical resistance" or "its resistance to something" I will assume you think the 2 are the same. Although someone with even a high school qualification in physics would know the difference and would know that in the context of the arguement we were not talking about electrical resistance in this case. LOL. "water is a liquid. retard" Is ice liquid?
@taledarkside I have no clue about matter???? LOL. The question was rhetorical. I know ice is solid. But do you know is ice also water. Therefore water can be solid. So your statement "water is liquid. retard" is hilariously ironic. Do you want me to explain irony to you as well? LOL.
@taledarkside When did I claim you can stand on the ocean? Oh thats right, I never.
"hence why your fucking stupid. yes quit ironic that you are stupid" Again makes no sense. Explain to me how it is ironic that I am stupid. Big LOL. You fucking idiot.
@taledarkside Real Physics? LOL. Everything I have said is way over your head.
Equations for resistance? LOL. This just shows how you misunderstood the use of the term "resistance" from the start. If a person is standing on a table and it doesnt break, what is the table doing to the force of gravity?
You make up shit about physics and you can't back it up with equations. ROFL When Newton made his three laws of physics, he created the equations to back his shit up.
funny how the guy that claims to know more than me cant put up the equations of his "resistance" theory. Lol, what a dumb piece of garbage puppet
@taledarkside WTF R u on about man. "Resistance theory"????? "claims to know more than you" For your information Newton did not "make" three laws of "physics". He discovered three laws of motion. The fact that you say things like "When Newton made his three laws of physics, he created the equations to back his shit up" shows how intelligent you really are and......well to cut a long story short.....the end. Have a nice life.
I'm still waiting for my equations of newtons first law. I guess you can't show how smart you are because your just a dumb pot smoking conspiracy theorist that learns physics from richard gage.
@taledarkside Honestly man. Give up. You are still waiting for your equations of newtons 1st law? LOL. From who? I thought, what was it you said, "it talks about a person standing on planet earth or a floor" LOL. So AGAIN, what does the earth do to a person standing on it? ( I wouldnt word it that way but that is the way you put it)
hmm the definition of resistance in "motion" not electricity since you are fucking stupid and that is obvious since you are from UK, people that believed in crop circles for 10 years.
"A force, such as friction, that operates opposite the direction of motion of a body and tends to prevent or slow down the body's motion. "
hmm friction. nothing close to what a floor, or the earth itself does to a person standing on it. Let me know when stupid idiots like you have a college ed
@taledarkside That doesnt even make sense. Apart from the bit you copied from a text book. And you dont understand that properly either. Ok you angry little cunt, what does the earth do to a person standing on it? Please explain.
Hey charlie, why don't you shove your psychological and NLP tricks up your ***?
Cheers.
MiklosTh3Gr3at 5 months ago
Comment removed
TheSentienthuman 5 months ago
@TheSentienthuman GO FUCK YOURSELF SMALL MINDED IMP. PEOPLE LIKE YOU MAKE ME ASHAMED TO BE HUMAN!!!! Take your ZERO subscribers (successful, arent you) and FUCK OFF
cveitch 5 months ago
@cveitch alotta love their chas
newworldodour 5 months ago
@cveitch a lot off love in that statement chas, so are we to believe your love is only conditional to those sheep that follow you? perhaps matey isn't concerned about subscribers like you are
newworldodour 5 months ago
@cveitch a lot off love in that statement chas, so are we to believe your love is only conditional to those sheep that follow you? perhaps matey isn't concerned about subscribers like you are
newworldodour 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@cveitch a lot off love in that statement chas, so are we to believe your love is only conditional to those sheep that follow you? perhaps matey isn't concerned about subscribers like you are
newworldodour 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@cveitch a lot off love in that statement chas, so are we to believe your love is only conditional to those sheep that follow you? perhaps matey isn't concerned about subscribers like you are
newworldodour 5 months ago
Awesome job shutting that cock up!
Do u have the Cambridge talk? Cudnt find it on youtube.
Cheers
jeishawi 6 months ago
I love the way you deal with morons that want to forbid you to do something or to be somwhere.
UltraKazew 6 months ago
i wonder why gage doesn't write down any of his idea's and get them peer reviewed.
mufc4527 6 months ago
you sold yourself cheap Charlie!! FUCK YOU! unsubscribe
MadeinBaghdad 6 months ago 4
I love how you ignore the guy in the suit
ShivayaNL 6 months ago
so then why are you flip flopping?
GalinorGustave2 7 months ago
Anyone who still believes the oficial story is a moron who can't connect the dots: hundreds of witnesses to explosions before and after the planes hit, 3 buildings that collapses exactly like controlled demolitions, findings of military explosivs in all dust samples. Those towers were blown up, thus it was an inside job. BTW, Charlie Veitch is a shill and a sell out.
The911watch 7 months ago
I heard thermite was used, evil bushwackers society-------------
v44forme1 7 months ago
Comment removed
theBartone9119 7 months ago
People act like members of the human race wouldn't risk their job/ life in exchange for fame/money? Most would do it out of the goodness of their hearts I'm sure anyway.
Unless over 50,000 professional experts people are Lying/Retarded, I think it's safe the say the conspiracies are bullshit.
theBartone9119 7 months ago
If I worked for any of those agencies and I was told to falsify data, I would go to the Times, the NY Times would then make a huge deal out of it like the media does with everything, they would pay me money,I would get interview deals, book deals, it would be bigger news than anything. The Times would get rich...........................Nope, everyone is scared (for some reason) lol You calling all of those people pussies? Are you saying they don't like over night fame/money? ...Are they robots?
theBartone9119 7 months ago
Comment removed
theBartone9119 7 months ago
1,500 people who worked the flight 93 crash scene
40,000 people who worked the piles at Ground Zero
55 FBI Evidence Response Teams at Fresh Kills in New York
7,000+ FBI Agents
8,000+ people who worked the scene at the Pentagon
I guess to you guys, all those people that helped out on the scene are part of a conspiracy to kill 3000 of their brothers and sisters.....YA RIGHT!
theBartone9119 7 months ago
@punxsutawneybarney The list of experts doesn't mean anything without the peer reviewed papers to back up the claims though, that's how you know legitimize your work (AE911 can't even get that process done legitimately). I have a list of 50 peer reviewed papers, would you like to see, or are they all "shills" hahha
theBartone9119 7 months ago
@punxsutawneybarney 'NIST says the "extensive damage" had nothing to do with the initiation of the collapse of Building 7'
Exactly.
If I untwist a jar cap, then I pop it off easily with my thumb, me popping it off is what initiated the cap flinging off , however, I could not have made the cap fling off unless the cap was untwisted before hand. Get it?
Plus the damage was only really seen on one side where the debris smacked it, but there were internal fires on 20 floors unfought for 7 hours
theBartone9119 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Richard Gage is a fucking idiot. The only people that a dumber than Gage are the fucking idiots that believe and follow his bullshit
Truthers are fucking idiots. Retarded monkeys are smarter than Truthers
12weasel100 7 months ago
Oh but I forgot about architects! Architecture is a bachelor of 'Arts', not science. Their opinion on buildings falling is JUST as valid as mine or yours (common you-tubers).
theBartone9119 7 months ago
I have found out the exact number of Structural Engineers in AE911........3.
I have a list of over 600+ Structural Engineers who have written peer reviewed papers supporting global collapse. Epic fail for twoofers.
AE911 even have Software Engineers and Landscape Engineers. Basically? I'll listen to the structural engineers when it comes to 911, thank you, you twoofers can listen to the dudes that cut your grass and make your computer programs.
theBartone9119 7 months ago
@theBartone9119 There are at least 40 structural engineers in AE911Truth. Software Engineers are not included as engineers. I don't know what a Landscape Engineer is.
punxsutawneybarney 7 months ago
@punxsutawneybarney "40 structural engineers in AE911Truth." Like I said, I just skimmed through the list quickly and only found 9, I'll take your word for it though. There was one Software Engineer and 2 Landscape Engineers (made up title) on the list. I only found 3 peer reviewed papers by AE911.
I have a list of over 600 civil engineers, most of them are structural engineers, so I'd say at least 400 structural engineers who support global collapse, plus a list of 50 peer reviewed papers.
theBartone9119 7 months ago
Comment removed
theBartone9119 7 months ago
@theBartone9119 Regina Naeckel is a licensed engineer, a graduate of the Technische Univerisaet Berlin. She is the only Landscape and Environmental Engineer on the list.
You claim to have 600 civil engineers who support global collapse. I would sure like to see your list. I've seen at most 25 names supporting the official reports, and for all of them their impartiality is tainted by contracts, associations, awards, appointments, or work for NIST.
punxsutawneybarney 7 months ago
@punxsutawneybarney "tainted by contracts" How are they tainted? They signed a contract to investigate the collapse of the WTC, are you implying these people are "in on it" to falsify data and not tell the truth?! Lol Moron.
I can't post links on you-tube comments, but i can copy and paste the list, their credentials shit on your AE911 shills
theBartone9119 7 months ago
@theBartone9119 Where are you getting these names? Anyone can post a list of names.
If you don't understand the concept of conflict of interest then you don't understand professional ethics.
punxsutawneybarney 7 months ago
@punxsutawneybarney I just told you where to get the names, I even gave you the link are you blind? Jesus you are hopeless LOL
theBartone9119 7 months ago
@punxsutawneybarney you don't know professional ethics if you think AE911 are pros, NOBODY in their field agrees.
theBartone9119 7 months ago
@punxsutawneybarney I can't post the full link, but do this.
type:
sites.google.com/site/wtc7lies/
then after that type:
someoftheagencies%2Corganizationsandindivi
as all one link.
theBartone9119 7 months ago
Comment removed
theBartone9119 7 months ago
@punxsutawneybarney If you want you can copy and paste each name into google, and check up on their investigative work on 911 if you don't believe me or the site. All it takes is research, you don't have to believe anybody lol
theBartone9119 7 months ago
@punxsutawneybarney Abolhassan Astaneh-Asl, Ph.D., P.E. / Aine M. Brazil, P.E., S.E. / Alan Rosa, P.E., S.E. / Alfred D. Barcenilla, Sr., P.E. / Allan Jowsey, Ph.D. / Allyn Kilsheimer, P.E., S.E. / Amit Bandyopadhyay, S.E. / Amy Zelson Mundorff / Anamaria Bonilla, S.E. / Andre Sidler, P.E., S.E. / Andrei Reinhorn, Ph.D., P.E., S.E. / Andrew Coats, P.E., S.E. / Andrew McConnell, S.E. / Andrew Mueller-Lust, S.E. / Andrew Pontecorvo, P.E. / Andrew Whittaker, Ph.D., P.E., S.E. /
theBartone9119 7 months ago
@punxsutawneybarney Bonnie Manley, P.E., S.E. / Boris Hayda, P.E., S.E. / Brian Lyons, Tully / Brian McElhatten, S.E. / Brian Smith (Col.), Chief Deputy Medical Examiner, Dover AFB / Brian Tokarczik, P.E., S.E. / Charles Hirsch, M.D. / Charles J. Carter, P.E., S.E. / Charles Thornton, P.E. / Charlie Vitchers / Christoph Hoffmann, Ph.D., Purdue University / Christopher E. Marrion, P.E. / Christopher M. Hewitt, AISC / Christopher N. McCowan / Chuck Guardia, S.E. / Conrad Paulson, P.E., S.E. /
theBartone9119 7 months ago
@punxsutawneybarney / Gary Steficek, S.E. / Gary Tokle, Asst. VP, NFPA / George Tamaro, P.E., S.E. / Gerald Haynes, P.E. / Gerald Wellman US&R Structural Specialist / Glenn Corbett / Graeme Flint / Guy Colonna, P.E., NFPA / Guylene Proulx, Ph.D. / H.S. Lew, P.E., S.E. / Hal Bidlack, Lt. Col. USAF (ret.), Ph.D. / Harold E. Nelson, P.E., FSFP.E. / Harry Martin, AISC / Howard R. Baum, Ph.D., M.E. / J. David Frost, Ph.D., P.E. / J. David McColskey / Jacques Grandino, P.E., S.E.
theBartone9119 7 months ago
@punxsutawneybarney You get the point.
there are hundreds on this list. check out:
sites.google.com/site/wtc7lies/introduction
Dig deep, you'll find the list there
I have a list of 50 peer reviewed papers too. Ae911 only have 3.
theBartone9119 7 months ago
@punxsutawneybarney I looked through the list and found 3 , then I was told it was 9 by someone else, now you say 40, either way the number isn't too high. I can find more relevant experts that believe in big foot lol
theBartone9119 7 months ago
Comment removed
theBartone9119 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Yo everybody, i made a techno song of Charlie veitch feat clinton,obama and bush called "good boy gone bad". Check it out,if enough people like i will make more songs before BBC release their hit piece! watch?v=KxFq3diZ-VI
Alamsoares1989 7 months ago
Please Respond to my Poll!
Give your estimate on % of people we lost from the truth movement because of this laughable attempt to reduce our numbers and discredit us.
I say less than 1%
What do you say?
Truther858 7 months ago
PIECE OF SHIT SELLOUT.
ENJOY THE MONEY THE BBC GAVE YOU BUT REMEMBER THAT YOU'LL GO DOWN IN HISTORY AS A SHILL AND SELLOUT.
0xNEVVG3N 7 months ago
----
Benedict Corporate Charlie EXPLAIN BUILDING 7
-----
Sounds4theInfowar 7 months ago 2
Richard Gage will not make much money from his 911 work, it involves a lot of work, a lot of time and a lot of travel and a lot of danger and aggravation
As a professional he takes time out of his working day to pursue this matter as a public service.
The issue of being Jewish is not only about making money but about protecting Israel. Sadly Israel played a leading role in this sordid affair
This is all about punishing the guilty and absolving the innocent. I hate 'set ups' and 'frame ups
thisisyourwakeup 7 months ago
@thisisyourwakeup
Richard Gage quit his job, because he makes 100,000 a year going to foreign countries and making up stories about 9/11.
how much work is that ? how much work is it to keep a website up? Not much. your making it out as if gage builds houses or roads as if he actually did work.
taledarkside 7 months ago
@thisisyourwakeup Yeah public service, man your funny.
Better stop raping young boys and go fulltime in public service.
koertje 1 week ago
i only added you because of the Richard Gage cambridge gig, now i realise that you are a mole. You remind me of Sayanim ( Jewish insiders ) such as the Naudet Brothers, Baron Cohen etc
Your interview was very weak, my opinion is that you were a mole in the first place designed to " see the truth' later
anyway you will be hearing more from me later
thisisyourwakeup 7 months ago
@thisisyourwakeup
You know that Richard Gage is a jew too. what do you think jews look like? cveitch and richard gage are both jews.
taledarkside 7 months ago
@taledarkside Veitch may well be a Syanim ( Israeli agent )who went undercover in the 'truth movement' with a few well publicized arrests in order to emerge years later during an all expenses paid BBC documentary as suddenly having 'grown up' and seen the 'error of his ways' This is important as we are about to reach the tenth anniversary of 9/11 and the perps want to pre empt any fresh public interest in this matter. Hence the new BBC mockumentary called 9/11 Road Trip
thisisyourwakeup 7 months ago
Respond to this video... Richard Gage is an outstanding man and No I did not know he was Jewish, Never read that or heard that. I myself have a Jewish father but I am certainly not a Veitch. The issue is not what Veitch looks like but his peculiar conversion to coincide with the tenth anniversary and his BBC all expenses paid holiday. I accuse Veitch of being an agent and taking part in a scripted plan, The issue of being Jewish is that Jews have most to gain from the perpetuation of
thisisyourwakeup 7 months ago 2
Respond to this video... the 9/11 .' Muslims did it ' myth
911 was a crime against humanity and very much an unsolved crime. The people blamed for doing it were media creations , Therefore until we get justice and get the international criminal cartel behind bars ( or preferably executed) this remains an unsolved crime
thisisyourwakeup 7 months ago
@thisisyourwakeup
what does that have to do with you being a supporter of richard gage. Jew making money off 9/11?
taledarkside 7 months ago
My question is which of the two of below is the one-eyed man.
VestigiumVeritatis 7 months ago
Original message from PiknSave (4/7/11) - I went to Westminster Magistrates Court this morning to speak to Mr Veitch about his Damascus conversion. At 10am I went inside and inspected the boards for all 8 courts. Guess what....no case against Mr Veitch was listed. It would appear that Bilderberg & the elites have fixed it for their puppet & set him up with a shitey media career. So ends the enigma that was the Love Police. Sold out for 30 pieces. As Veitch himself used to shout: Shame on you!
wikkipikki 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Harold Camping was RIGHT about May 21, click on my channel to see...
youneekk 7 months ago
It's as if the establishment has cloned him or something and the real genuine, passionate Charlie is tied up in a dungeon somewhere!
keiththegreatest 7 months ago
Hmm Charlie... What a Fake you are
sgentlemanjack112 7 months ago
much love Charlie!!
gwald 7 months ago
wtf?
asetentay8 7 months ago
Something's fisy.
WTFaboutWTC7 7 months ago
Jesus Christ...what the fuck happened Charlie...you really need to explain yourself and show us this evidence.
furikuri26 7 months ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
So basically to sum up my last 3 posts perfectly:
Gage is either a brilliant con man, or one the worst and careless engineers in the history of the industry. Cheers!
kushsmokkeralt 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Building 7 was no mystery either. Reporters were told at 2pm it would collapse. The firefighters couldn't contain the inferno,and they heard loud groaning, things were dripping/falling, and the ceilings were sagging in, so they didn't even want to fight the fire, they warned everyone right away that Building 7 was coming down next. Firefighters said they've never seen anything like it
/watch?v=WnYBX6QT0R4
This woman says "I just got word, Building 7 is next"
/watch?v=O-WZpXiEKAo
Mystery? No..
kushsmokkeralt 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The Inward bowing probably ripped the support out, making everything else come crashing down quickly, and gravity accumulated the progressive mass. Gage acts like the buildings didn't even have floors when he did his silly box "demonstration" **Face Palm**. Plus the core of the South Tower was still standing for a few seconds after the collapse, you would think a controlled demolition would have taken that out as the collapse was initiating...
kushsmokkeralt 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Universal collapse from inward bowing is what happened(Rough calculations but point is simple).It wasn't 10% crushing 90% obviously, it was 10% crushing the bottom 1% (floor), then the total mass= 11%, that 11% then crushed another 1% (floor), then that total mass =12% in a PROGRESSIVE manner until it reached the ground. Everything else just got taken out along the way down as the floors were being pulverized. You need to stop watching Richard Gage play with boxes (boxes don't have floors).
kushsmokkeralt 7 months ago
your all so funny making statements as though you are scientists lol... do u think u are the first to become critics of richard gage...? u are missing the point too... there is no way the planes could have brought down the buildings they were built to with stand multi hits from planes, even earth quakes don't turn buildings to dust... building 7 was a bunker lol...!!! and it just fell down?? lol...
dude7777777100 8 months ago
@dude7777777100 No it didnt just "fall down" it had extensive damage to the back of the building. 9/11 documentaries also fail to show the START of the building collapsing... they edit out the east penthouse collapsing which means it took 15 seconds to collapse, NOT 7. I'm not criticising richard gage - I'm as critical of America as much as the next hardcore liberal, but the evidence presented for 9/11 is circumstantial, false or just doesn't prove shit
aiiiunluckykid 8 months ago
@aiiiunluckykid NIST says the "extensive damage" had nothing to do with the initiation of the collapse of Building 7. FEMA said the same thing. Damage all on one side should have generated asymmetrical toppling forces and clearly did not.
punxsutawneybarney 7 months ago 6
Comment removed
theBartone9119 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
75,450 DOLLARS
Richard Gage's salary in 2009 from Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth. That's according to the 2009 Form 990-EZ available right now at GuidestarDOTorg, an online organization that helps track non-profits.
The total revenue for 2009 -- 344,570. Salaries for Gage and others topped out at 107,417. That means salaries constitute 31% of AE911Truth's expenses.
In other words, Richard Gage's salary is 21% of all revenue received by AE911Truth in 2009.
911 TRUTH = 911 LIES
ctcole77 5 months ago
@allegorians i dont see how it is ignorant thinking. ofcourse it has to be reviewed by other scientists - and no not necessarily NIST or the 9/11 commission, and even if it was so what?? That argument just assumes theres a shitload of people in on it which makes me even more skeptical. The buildings didnt even collapse in 10 seconds either, as so many of these documentaries claim, it was more like 20 secs, but they show you from an obscure angle that misrepresents that.
aiiiunluckykid 8 months ago
Harrit et al found nano-thermite and there is simply no benign reason for the appearance of nano-thermite in the WTC dust. A new investigation is needed.
Lietuvispartizan 8 months ago
It's unlikely such a low perdentage would even be detactable, and certainly wouldnt account for USGS dust samples showing as much as 5.4 sulfur.
Finally, before claiming to have found the chemical signature of thermate in a sample, a reasonable scientist would ensure that all of the elements of thermate are present, and this is where Harrit's thermate claim completely, utterly falls apart.
kushsmokkeralt 8 months ago
so did you film what that guy said?? its past the date now and I'm interested what he said? have a link or something ? anyway you're an awesome guy that think for himself.. problem is there's too many sheep around here..
xJaysrox 8 months ago
Indeed :)
DVincentW 8 months ago
Comment removed
Jimmyretired 8 months ago
Charlie is a legend. Another great video. Love the way you handled that monkey in a suit and he had little choice but to back done.
I hope Mr Gage's speech is on YouTube somewhere...
Catandthespoon 8 months ago
This building represents the sumerian god's use of an omphalos,these were said to whisper voices to and fro from earth to the planet of the Annunaki,We today would call it a communication device such as a cb radio etc. it's typical that elites would use this symbol in their architecture.So just a little history for you.
2wheels88 8 months ago
The American Society of Civil Engineers has about 120,000 members who all confirm the National Institute of Standard and Technology report. Implosion World (#1 website for controlled demo's) wrote a paper saying that there were no signs of a CD on 911. And the chemicals found in thermate are simple and could me found in many things in regular debris (sulfur is found everywhere for example). Gage simply selectively picked a few of the many chemicals found to prove "thermate" lol Wake up people!
kushsmokkeralt 8 months ago
@kushsmokkeralt Welcome to 2009, read the paper "Active thermitic material discovered in 9/11dust.." written by prof.N.Harrit. They didn't found just chemical traces. They found the energetic material itself (red/grey chips), which has thermitic properties.Please update your info.
Lietuvispartizan 8 months ago
@Lietuvispartizan
lol energetic material.
all material has energy in it. wow are you dumb people believe everything you read on the internet
taledarkside 8 months ago
@taledarkside lol you missed this: "...which has thermitic properties".
Lietuvispartizan 8 months ago
@Lietuvispartizan
the part where molecules have the ability to absorb, retain and transfer heat.
many things do that too.
taledarkside 8 months ago
@Lietuvispartizan Welcome to 2011.In deed, the presence of iron, sulfure, aluminum, potassium, maganese,fluorine, and titanium in the WTC dust are all supported by USGS dust samples, and most are engredients of thermate. However the first thing any reasonable scientist would investigate is whether or not there are any natural (non-thermate related) sources for these chemicals.
kushsmokkeralt 8 months ago
@Lietuvispartizan The third most common ingredient in the World Trade Center construction was gypsum-based drywall, which is 18.62 sulfur. Iron is used in paint and electronic devices. Potassium is used in concrete. Manganese was used for structural steel, paint, batteries, and ceramics. Flourine is used in Freon. 200,000 pounds of Freon cooled the WTC complex.This was the largest air-conditioning system in the country.
kushsmokkeralt 8 months ago
@Lietuvispartizan Titanium is used in paper and paint (both common at the WTC) and made up 2% of each of the 767's. WTC7 was also clad in polished steel and titanium. To claim that these were uncommon at the WTC,and that the only explanation for their presence is though the use of thermate, is an unbelievable joke.The next thing any reasonable scientist would do is check that the elements are present in their correct, signature quantities.
kushsmokkeralt 8 months ago
@Lietuvispartizan According to A&E for truth , "about 1,000 pounds od explosives would be sufficient [per tower]". For both towers and WTC7, this would equal about 3,000 pounds of thermate. Thermate is 2% sulfur. This calculates out to about 60 pounds of sulfur. Approximately 1 million tons (2 billion pounds) of dust blanketed lower Manhatton. Based on Professor Jones' estimates, a thermite reaction would cause the WTC dust to be approximately 0.000003% sulfur.
kushsmokkeralt 8 months ago
@Lietuvispartizan The two main byproducts of thermate are aluminum oxide (41%) and barium nitrate (29%). Both are unique to thermate and would have no reason for being found at the WTC - except through the use of thermate. However, neither of the USGS nor Harrit himself report finding any traces of either of these elements . Harrit points to traces of aluminum, but there is a world of a difference between aluminum and aluminum oxide (which has 3 oxygen atoms)
kushsmokkeralt 8 months ago
@Lietuvispartizan So there's STILL no solid proof of themite/mate, and on a final note: No building has EVER been demolished using thermite/thermate in mankind's history, because it wouldn't be an efficient method of controlled demoliton by any stretch of the imagination. This is confirmed by Ron Craig (controlled demoltion expert from Toronto) and many other experts. "Taking down a building with thermite/thermate is like getting drunk off mouthwash when you have have champagne" .Please update.
kushsmokkeralt 8 months ago
@kushsmokkeralt sulfure, potassium, maganese, fluorine, titanium..? There are no S, K, F, Ti elements in the red/grey chips. Obviously you haven’t read the “Active thermitic material” paper. You just watched a video, which was very poorly done. I’m certain that the author of that video, who also hasn't read the paper, b/c in the 2 part he talked about the elements (sulfur, titanium, barium) which weren't found in the red/grey chips...
Lietuvispartizan 8 months ago
@Lietuvispartizan red/gey chips? INSIDE JOB FOR SURE!! lol
kushsmokkeralt 8 months ago
apparently some shills claim the "plane" hit with so much force that the steel structured tower didn't stand a chance and that the momentum created was enough to allow the hollow nose cone to rip through intact,still have enough momentum for the fuel filled wings to slice through intact and still have enough momentum for the tail-section to slice through intact and then we see the nose cone emerge out of the other side intact.
hallelujah...it's a fucking miracle
kansasinnovember 8 months ago
Went to see this lecture today with my girlfriend - was pretty eye opening and full of awesomeness. Wanted to stay around afterwards but was parked illegally so wanted to get back. Make sure you post a video if anything else like this is coming up as that's the only way i'll hear about it!
Zeraxus1 8 months ago
@Zeraxus1
your forcing your girlfriend to be a sheep for richard gage too. sad
taledarkside 8 months ago
Charlie, Richard Gage is an clever kind couragous man, who is devoting his life to uncovering the truth of the real perpetrators of 9/11. If you haven't yet watched his presentation AE911 Truth, please avail yourself of it, the facts are undeniable. I would encourage any and all to do likewise. Peace.
cobra60six 8 months ago
i'll be there. thanks charlie
FreeTruthShow 8 months ago
at last!!! no more secrets
paulvanjaf2 8 months ago
lmao. Big charlie just blanks that suited dipshit. I have a lot of love for you, charlie. Brush em off like the insects they currently are. (Maybe on eday they'll be butterflies but i highly fuckin doubt it. :D
Strangeloveization 8 months ago
So how much is richard gage charging for free speech and free information?
taledarkside 8 months ago
what a piece of shit, standing on someones property and damaging it.
taledarkside 8 months ago
@taledarkside yeah, the wall was ready to collapse right, there. next time your standfing on a kerb im calling the police, you deranged fool. (If you were bein sarcastic I apologise, I hope you were) x
Strangeloveization 8 months ago
I'm American and I'm with you 100% my friend. I'm mad as hell with this government making the rest of the world hate Americans. I consider my self to be awake not a part of any nationality nor religion.
bradMi80 8 months ago 2
Richard Gae is a fraud and a 9-11 profiteer. Watch youtube video "Architects and engineers for truth,lies and distortions"
dreadnaught2 8 months ago
@dreadnaught2 Troll alert!
Nellynoodlebums 8 months ago
this guys a scumbag go back to Brazil and do stupid shit like that there.
speedii69 8 months ago
@speedii69 your not a very sexy person, are you?
Strangeloveization 8 months ago
Brilliant video man. I'm also so very proud of Richard Gage and from my heart want the truth to be known.
Love the way you handled the security guard too.
hapkido690 8 months ago
check out the images of the double decker said to have been blown apart by "terrorists" on 7/7.....you can clearly see for yourself where (front upper deck) the "real" perps have tried to remove the roof with of all things....a circular saw / angle grinder.
kansasinnovember 8 months ago 2
what did Jean Charles De menezes uncover that was so sensitive he needed to be shot in the head SEVEN TIMES.....
being shot in the head 7 times is NOT mistaken identity,especially when the authorities had every chance of arresting him...alive.
silenced.....why ?
kansasinnovember 8 months ago 16
Comment removed
plenty2see 8 months ago
@kansasinnovember IF YOU WATCH 77 RIPPLE , he may have been an unsuspecting victim in helping mi5 and 6 setting up the false flag operation. because of his skill as an electrician, and so he was murdered.. lets hope his killers suffer nightmares from it..
plenty2see 8 months ago
@kansasinnovember He was an illegal immigrant, now stop being on the side of those and support your country otherwise get out we dont need any more traitors here,
Jimmyretired 8 months ago
@Jimmyretired what the hell does his immigration status have to do with him (Jean Charles De Menezes) being shot in the head SEVEN times.
kansasinnovember 8 months ago
@kansasinnovember It has everything to do with it, im fed up of illegal immigrants coming to my country hiding in lorries and crawling in containers then stealing our tax cash, I have no sympathy for them they need to be rounded up and removed.
Jimmyretired 8 months ago
@Jimmyretired explain exactly what you mean when you say JC De Menezes being shot 7 times in the head has "everything" to do with his immigration status ?
kansasinnovember 8 months ago
@Jimmyretired if you have a problem with illegal immigrants wouldn't you be better off venting your frustrations on a video link directly concerns that very issue..
kansasinnovember 8 months ago
@kansasinnovember the aluminum was common through it's use in the WTC's facade, the 767's, and vehicles. The presence of these elements (in quantities consistant with the only with their natural use throughout the WTC complex), doesn't in any way support the use of thermate, and the lack of aluminum oxide and barium nitrate thoroughly disproves it.
kushsmokkeralt 8 months ago
why did the then aussie prime minister John Howard make a statement regarding the london "bombings" of 7/7 on the 8th july at 8 am (gmt) stating that the "bombings" had claimed the lives of 52 people,when at the same time the police,rescue workers and forensics had only accounted for 37 "bodies". he even beat the BBC to the final figure by an amazing 3 days...
...foreknowledge of the event or just a damn good guess.
kansasinnovember 8 months ago 3
ive got an answer to all questions - they did it, so they could stay on top and bring you oil and all the other benefits...(with maximum profit ofc)
HumanityWins 8 months ago
could someone explain how the engine planted..i mean found on murray street landed where it did without knocking down any of the surrounding scaffolding...and how long have CFM56 engines been used on 767's
kansasinnovember 8 months ago
911 was not an inside job, the terrorists made building 7 that was not even hit by a plane fall down with the power of their minds! Remember that the majority is always right, Nazi Germany-Majority,slavery-majority,womens rights- supported by minority! The shape of the earth was said to be circular and the guy who said it was condemned, keep it up majority you are on to a winner. Justin bieber is a king
HarryBlufc91 8 months ago 2
@HarryBlufc91 WTC 7 had a 20 story gash on the South side, it was bound to collapse.
chavspotter 8 months ago
@chavspotter If it had a 20 story gash which I am sure it didnt but even if it did then the building would have collapsed at that damage spot and fall over.. Not straight down in its footprint with 0 resistance.
ozmangolfer 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@chavspotter "WTC 7 had a 20 story gash on the South side, it was bound to collapse"
REALLY?? how starnge that it came down oh so perfect,now im not a controled demolition expert but that was most definatly CONTROLED.
pinball281 8 months ago
@chavspotter straight down, you silly boy. IF it had a 20 story gash in the south side, dont you think it may have fell to the ones side? come on, you gotta try THINKIN sometime, its good for the soul :)
Strangeloveization 8 months ago
@Strangeloveization
everything falls straight down. when something falls to one side, it still falls straight down. still trying to figure out gravity?
taledarkside 8 months ago
@taledarkside im gonna pretend u never typed that. Yes, gravity pull straight down, but not when theres resistance, you monkey. In your world if I put my kid on a chute where there is resistance he'll slide straight down thru the metal and into he ground, not at an angle?. You have heard of 'matter', yes? solidity? your standing on it right now, and your not falling. Amazing. Its called resistance. :D
Strangeloveization 8 months ago
@Strangeloveization
what i'm standing on isn't resistance. LOL you are so dumb. learn some physics from a university you dumb puppet.
and your kid is being pulled by a force which is projecting him down.
taledarkside 8 months ago
@taledarkside lmao. what your standing on is SOLID, therefor it resists gravity or we'd all br freefalling forever u dipshit. A building cannot fall in freefall with no resistance. drop a rock on your foot and see if it hits it or floats thru it you clown. Ie: resistance. ;)
Strangeloveization 8 months ago
@Strangeloveization
its impossible for anything to free fall because we have something called "air resistance" so yes, you need to learn physics.
and you standing on a floor isn't resistance. you standing on a floor isn't slowing you down.
do you get brainwashed when richard gage drops two boxes and says only 1 box fell? what the 2nd box he dropped didn't fall. LOL stupid people
taledarkside 8 months ago
@taledarkside
Standing on a floor IS resistance - It's a resistance which is stopping you from accelerating towards the centre of the earth.
Also, Gage isn't a conspiracy theorist, he's just a professional concerned about the poor scientific investigation into 9/11.
Just go watch the videos again and tell me it's not a controlled demolition seriously
Zeraxus1 8 months ago
@Zeraxus1
you fail to understand newtons first law of motion where, standing on the ground isn't resistance. ROFL
If gage is a professional, why doesn't he ever use numbers. Like 500,000,000lbs of momentum that was created?
taledarkside 8 months ago
@taledarkside
Not sure what you are trying to prove exactly? Even without looking at the physics you can just see that a fire wouldn't have caused that kind of spontaneous collapse. Glad you are looking into the evidence though, that's always good :)
Venom8480 8 months ago
@Venom8480
how would you know what happens? your opinion isn't physics
just like zeraxus is an idiot for not knowing physics
taledarkside 8 months ago
@taledarkside
Actually I do have an Alevel in Physics and newtons first law just states that 0 movement (velocity) just shows there is an equalibrium of force! Please explain to us all what REALLY happened then as you seem to be an expert on 9/11
Zeraxus1 8 months ago
@Zeraxus1
i'll get to that point when you not that standing on a floor isn't resistance. wow, you know newtons force law but you can't comprehend it. ROFL
newtons first law talks about standing on the planet earth or on a floor. which has nothing to do with resistance.
and I have a university degree in engineering. you even dont know high school physics. LOL resistance
taledarkside 8 months ago
@taledarkside "newtons first law talks about standing on the planet earth or on a floor". LOL Does it? A university degree? OK then. LOL. To make statements like that then to say you have a degree is hilarious. You twat. Heres a question for you, can you stand on water? Should be fairly easy for someone of your knowledge.
KS8730 7 months ago
@KS8730
water is a liquid. retard.
i see you missed newtons first law since your like the other idiots that think standing on something means it's "resistance"
taledarkside 7 months ago
@taledarkside I know newtons 1st law very well and it says nothing about standing on planet earth or a floor. lol. Do you realise how stupid you look to say this followed by the claim of a uni degree? And "resistance" is a term that can be applied in different ways. To quote you " it's "resistance" " (which actually means "it is resistance" because of the aposrophe and makes no grammatical sense what so ever, further emphasising your stupidity.) implies electrical resistance which is different
KS8730 7 months ago
@KS8730
maybe you dumb that you don't understand newtons first law because you have no engineering degree.
that means according to you, standing on the earth, you will slowly sink into the middle of the earth
taledarkside 7 months ago
@taledarkside LOL. your understanding of basic english lets you down. My comment to you was to provoke thought. You are thinking, but it seems you dont understand what I was saying. To quote "that means according to you, standing on the earth, you will slowly sink into the middle of the earth". No, you dimwit, cant you see it is you who is actually saying that? OK. Here is a chance to redeem yourself, If I have an old wooden table and continue to put bricks on top of it what will happen and why?
KS8730 7 months ago
@KS8730
wooden table will break due to increase pressure, which has nothing to do with resistance.
taledarkside 7 months ago
@taledarkside Shit explaination for someone with a degree. Why does the table break? Come on man I am giving you a chance here.
KS8730 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@KS8730
I already answered it for you. are you too dumb to understand because your from the UK and believe in crop circles.
taledarkside 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@KS8730
"I know newtons 1st law very well and it says nothing about standing on planet earth or a floor"
then you should post up all the mathematical equations that applies to Newtons first theory of motion. Since you know it so well. And I expect it to be in Calculus form
taledarkside 7 months ago
@taledarkside (cont) from talking about a materials resistance to a force i.e gravity. And since you say "it's resistance" as opposed to "its electrical resistance" or "its resistance to something" I will assume you think the 2 are the same. Although someone with even a high school qualification in physics would know the difference and would know that in the context of the arguement we were not talking about electrical resistance in this case. LOL. "water is a liquid. retard" Is ice liquid?
KS8730 7 months ago
@KS8730
so you going to make assumptions like the typical tinfoil hat wearing conspiracy theorist. When did electricity have to do with this argument?
And you don't know what kind of matter ice is .ROFL no clue about the three states of matter.
taledarkside 7 months ago
@taledarkside I have no clue about matter???? LOL. The question was rhetorical. I know ice is solid. But do you know is ice also water. Therefore water can be solid. So your statement "water is liquid. retard" is hilariously ironic. Do you want me to explain irony to you as well? LOL.
KS8730 7 months ago
@KS8730
"Therefore water can be solid. So your statement "water is liquid. retard""
you mean your comment of standing on the ocean and claiming you can stand on it, in its liquid state.
hence why your fucking stupid. yes quit ironic that you are stupid
taledarkside 7 months ago
@taledarkside When did I claim you can stand on the ocean? Oh thats right, I never.
"hence why your fucking stupid. yes quit ironic that you are stupid" Again makes no sense. Explain to me how it is ironic that I am stupid. Big LOL. You fucking idiot.
KS8730 7 months ago
@KS8730
"Oh thats right, I never."
you have no clue about physics or the English language.
if you have no clue about newtons first law, then you should post up your equations for "resistance" of a person standing on a table.
I know you are like all truthers. a pussy when it comes to real physics. then you gonna cry and leave the conversation like jesse ventura.
taledarkside 7 months ago
@taledarkside Real Physics? LOL. Everything I have said is way over your head.
Equations for resistance? LOL. This just shows how you misunderstood the use of the term "resistance" from the start. If a person is standing on a table and it doesnt break, what is the table doing to the force of gravity?
KS8730 7 months ago
@KS8730
You make up shit about physics and you can't back it up with equations. ROFL When Newton made his three laws of physics, he created the equations to back his shit up.
funny how the guy that claims to know more than me cant put up the equations of his "resistance" theory. Lol, what a dumb piece of garbage puppet
taledarkside 7 months ago
@taledarkside WTF R u on about man. "Resistance theory"????? "claims to know more than you" For your information Newton did not "make" three laws of "physics". He discovered three laws of motion. The fact that you say things like "When Newton made his three laws of physics, he created the equations to back his shit up" shows how intelligent you really are and......well to cut a long story short.....the end. Have a nice life.
KS8730 7 months ago
@KS8730
great job in posting the equation to your bullshit physics. just like ventura, when you can't answer the tough questions you pussy out.
now someone that can't even write Newtons equations thinks they know everything about him. ROFL
what a piece of garage foreigner. supports richard gage that makes money telling stupid people like KS8730 dumb physics.
taledarkside 7 months ago
@taledarkside Away ye go ya fuckin numpty. LOL.
KS8730 7 months ago
@KS8730
I'm still waiting for my equations of newtons first law. I guess you can't show how smart you are because your just a dumb pot smoking conspiracy theorist that learns physics from richard gage.
taledarkside 7 months ago
@taledarkside Honestly man. Give up. You are still waiting for your equations of newtons 1st law? LOL. From who? I thought, what was it you said, "it talks about a person standing on planet earth or a floor" LOL. So AGAIN, what does the earth do to a person standing on it? ( I wouldnt word it that way but that is the way you put it)
KS8730 7 months ago
@KS8730
hmm the definition of resistance in "motion" not electricity since you are fucking stupid and that is obvious since you are from UK, people that believed in crop circles for 10 years.
"A force, such as friction, that operates opposite the direction of motion of a body and tends to prevent or slow down the body's motion. "
hmm friction. nothing close to what a floor, or the earth itself does to a person standing on it. Let me know when stupid idiots like you have a college ed
taledarkside 7 months ago
@taledarkside That doesnt even make sense. Apart from the bit you copied from a text book. And you dont understand that properly either. Ok you angry little cunt, what does the earth do to a person standing on it? Please explain.
KS8730 7 months ago