Added: 4 years ago
From: Orfeus80
Views: 4,082
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (17)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Wow, she really slo-o-o-w-s down for the runs in the second half, which is certainly not endorsed by modern performance standards, but this is still a wonderful performance! Your description of the not-so-great three-octave voice is funny... and accurate. :) Onegin's voice is marvelously even and full throughout her range; truly a pleasure to hear. Thank you for posting. :)

  • Strange the way she does the second part, with rallentandos. Sublime, voice strangely done in the high register. Also the last note with long sound. She breaks the text and she takes a very big fiato.

    l may be think that she changes register..

  • Another (and maybe the most important) reason she breaks the last line is that the recording engineer had her turn away from the microphone so that her strong high note would not destroy the master cut. If you listen closely, you can hear the reverb of the studio walls changing as she turns back shortly before she goes down to the last note.

  • heavy rubato (as well as the sliding) was a typical performance practice during this period.

  • Comment removed

  • l don't think she should have sung this aria for light soprano.

    En effect the high c is a bit strange, poor and probably difficult in her time to be recorded. But, let me listen to her voice in Wagner, she is marvelous.

  • As your notes state, Onegin was a rare coloratura contralto, who had a seamless three-octave range from top to bottom.

    She also had fabulous agility, including an effortless and even trill and the ability to execute a perfect messa di voce.

  • I have a british melody, The fairy Pipers, and old schellack record, and at the end she does an ubelievable messa di voce, possibly the best I ever heard, and then does a long Selma Kurz-like trill, with the flute improvising on her long trill. Gorgeous.

  • This is down a full step I assume

  • No it isn't. If it was a full step down, she'd be seeing in her lowest register.

  • *singing..... not seeing. sorry!

  • Actually, it is. I have absolute pitch.

    It may just be the fidelity of the recording, but it's doubtful. As a 3-octave vocalist whose voice is most comfortable in lower keys, this sounds similar to how my voice sounds singing it in Eb, not in the original key of F. There is no strain until the very end, and she sings with a fullness characteristic of a heavy voice in a flat key. That tone wouldn't translate if a recording was transposed.

  • Plus, pitch wasn't standardized in Mozart's time (good news for anyone wishing to be the Queen of the Night!), so ideally, the notated key would only be a guide for the people of today, who do standardize pitch. Furthermore, pitch wasn't internationally standardized until 1939. Onegin died shortly after that. All of this being said, in her time, nobody cared, and transposition at the drop of a hat was common among singers (notably Caruso).

  • extraordinary

  • For my ears-she could even sing the phone book!She was in a class with Erna Berger and Rosa Ponselle! Brava! TY.

  • Quite a discovery to hear it sung by a low voice - and so good one, too:)

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more