CBS Ron Paul: Obama's Plan is a Disaster Part 2

[mcbowler]

Ron Paul says the same things I found out on my own. We are doing exactly the same things that we did in the 1930's.

[coolhandluke2401]

Bob Schieffer is just another liberal sheep. Here he's supporting Obama's war policy... which is the exact same policy Bush had at the end of his presidency. Their goals are exactly the same. Obama brought nothing new to the table, except this impending Afghanistan disaster. You don't send in more troops without any operational plan at all.

But he's a Democrat so he's obviously smarter and better cultured than a slack-jawed hillbilly Republican racist.

[chainzdown2dadik]

lmao "a danger that we're gonna be in the middle of this dogfight that's been going on since roman times" haha true shit

[thomasmoonman]

explain why its true shit? because from my studys it seems to be a correct statement

[TheFathersAdvocate]

How about the child's freedom of choice? Is that considered by liberals?

And remember, there is a difference between Republicans (Ron Paul), and Neo-Conservatives (McCain, Bush). The difference is more dramatic than the difference between Democrats and Neo-Cons.

We should get on national defense (monetary and foreign policies) and forget this national offense that jeopardizes our security rather than preserving it.

[extradeen]

what kidn of crappily edited video is this? sounds like they're trying to censure him

[jimmnaca]

Arguing online is like being in the special olympics, even if you win you're still retarded.

[dale1966gto]

Speaking of Special Olympics, what an insensitive and inappropriate remark he made on the Tonight Show a few night's ago. Even THINKING along those lines(making fun of crippled CHILDREN) is unthinkable. If Bush(or any other Republican for that matter) had said that, we'd have never heard the end of it. But no, Obama the Messiah gets a pass. Bullshit. An apology is not enough. He's an insensitive and heartless sociopath(cares about no one but himself - like O.J.). BTW, good riddance to him.

[tonyteb]

name one with true integrity the only dreamer hear is you cause the only person in congress with consitent princabled itegrity is RON PAUL aND democrats aint politicians and obama can withstand special intrest give me a break man u r naive if u belive that. stupid ideas like following the constitution obeying the rule of law protecting our freedoms only go to war as defence of our country restoring our monitary system low taxes i guess the fouders of the republic are all stupid with dumb ideas.

[Smackdown5]

Lol if Ron Paul became president, he would see how hard it is to do what he wants to do. He can speak nice all he wants, but after you become president, governing wont allow you to do that. Nice rhetoric by Paul though.......

[tonyteb]

who says governing wont allow you to do what hes saying he wants to do he is governing hello he is a a rep. in texas 14 terms read some of the bills he rights i know your not used to someone with true integrity and thats why ur confused about rhetoric who did you vote for

[Smackdown5]

I am used to people with TRUE integity. Ron Paul sounds like a dreamer but he is a politician. His dreams are unrealistic, and the special interests groups will bring him down to Earth. I am a proud Democrat and hate all republicans because they went way too far to the right and their ideas are plain stupid! Just like the people they nominate. "Thanks but No thanks"!

[maxbm]

You're a complete and total moron. Ron Paul would've been 1000x better than Obama, who is just another version of Bush, the neocons.

Obama is continuing their policies of borrowing from other countries (i.e. China and Japan), taxing U.S. citizens, and printing more money - all to finance the bankster thievery in the USA and foreign interventions overseas, such as in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan.

The only "change" is the color of his skin.

O.B.A.M.A. = One Big-Ass Mistake, America

[Smackdown5]

I bet you are a republican.... And he is not continuing to borrow anything. Like you said, hes been in office for a month. So far he is DIFFERENT than Bush thats a BIG ASS CHANGE!

[maxbm]

You're still trapped in the phony left-right paradigm. You have no idea whatsoever the proper role of government. I'm an independent who voted for Ron Paul during the primaries.

He's not continuing to borrow anything? Bullshit. Hillary Clinton, Secretary of State under Obama, recently visited China, begging and pleading with them to purchase more of our treasury bonds.

Please describe how he is different than Bush, citing facts not bullshit. You haven't given me anything that shows "change".

[Smackdown5]

First of all, yes I am on the left. I am proud PROGRESSIVE democrat that had enough of the far right; neo cons! I am tired of Bush and all the conservative republicans. Obama reaches across party lines (even if republicans dont reach back). Bush never did that. Obama is bringing the troops home. Obama believes in science. something republicans don't. Obama is smart, and able to bring change. You are after him just a month after he took office. So how do you know he is another Bush? Its silly!

[maxbm]

You really are thick, aren't you? Bush was NOT conservative. You have no idea what the word means, do you?

Obama is NOT bringing the troops home. You posted a comment in my last video regarding this crap. The earliest they can be back, according to Obama, is the END OF 2011. As if that wasn't far too long, the timetable will most likely be extended even further.

Have you been reading anything I stated regarding borrowing from China/Japan, more taxes, and more foreign interventions/wars?

[Smackdown5]

Bush wasn't a Conservative? Dude which fucking planet do you live on. Do you think the republican party would elect a progressive? Yes I spend a huge amount of time on the news. Thats kind of my job. Hillary Clinton asked the Chinese President to buy US debt and bonds. Nothing about taxes though. Obama IS bringing the troops home and leaving 50,000 thousand that would be brought some 18 months later. Give the guy a beak for God's sake. We both know its too early to judge. Wait and see!

[maxbm]

No, Bush was NOT a conservative, not socially and especially not fiscally. He left the borders wide open for illegal immigrants to flood the USA. He started multiple wars to "spread democracy", like a liberal Democrat. Those wars cost us trillions, along with the bailouts.

My point regarding China was that Obama is continuing the policy of BORROWING TRILLIONS FROM THAT COUNTRY, just like BUSH.

Obama is NOT bringing the troops home if 50,000 will remain there. You really are brainwashed.

[Smackdown5]

What are you talking about? Bush was a conservative. Bush was a puppet that was controlled by Cheney. The republicans moved so far to the right, that choosing some that is not conservative would be a failure. Because he failed, you dont need to call him a Liberal. Liberal stands for freedom and respect. Bush was anything but that. Bush is a conservative, even though his actions were stupid like him. So please dont blame the democrats for The mistakes of the republicans. They fucked up!

[maxbm]

Learn what the word "conservative" means and how it relates to government spending and foreign wars.

You have it all wrong. The Republicans, or I should say neocons, moved very much to the LEFT, with liberal wars of aggression and massive government spending.

Democrats, especially in the 20th century, were the ones responsible for foreign interventions, NOT Republicans. Do some research on history and then get back to me.

[maxbm]

"Liberal" doesn't stand for freedom and respect. You have no idea what the word means. Infringing on my right to bear arms is NOT freedom nor respect.

The only thing "liberal" stands for is BIG GOVERNMENT. If you want govt to make decisions for you and control your life, vote Democrat.

[Smackdown5]

I know the difference. Not in all cases though. Bush was ideologically conservative, but had bigger government because he fucked up the country. Its Ironic that republicans claim to be for small government, but all they do is SPEND money and then when they are the minority, they sing the same old song about small government. I am sick of that. They are liars and phonies.

[maxbm]

The only Republicans you know, due to lack of political knowledge, are the neoconservatives like Bush, Cheney, and McCain. Those people are LIBERALS masquerading as conservatives. They do NOT represent traditional Republican or conservative ideals or values.

[Smackdown5]

***McCain was the stupidest CANDIDATE for president ***

My mistake

[maxbm]

McCain and Cheney were U.S. presidents?? Are you creating American history now?

Hoover was like Bush?? Hoover was adamantly against government spending, very much different from Bush, which was why he was criticized at the start of the Great Depression.

You get more ridiculous with every new comment that you post.

[Smackdown5]

I said McCain, the candidate. I type fast and it came out as if he was a president. Its a typo!

[maxbm]

Nice job removing the retarded comment above.

[Smackdown5]

I removed the comment, because It sounded like McCain was a president, when in fact it was a typo. And you removed your retarded comment earlier. You are a true republican. You are ashamed of calling yourself one, so you go with independent and then being a hypocrite. Its hillarious. I support the FREEDOM of CHOICE!

[maxbm]

I only removed a previous comment I made because I forgot to elaborate on something. You removed yours because you sounded like a fucktarded imbecile, saying both McCain and Cheney were U.S. presidents.

Yes, you're right. I'm a "true Republican" because I heavily criticized Bush and the neocons for years, considering that they weren't conservative whatsoever. I didn't vote for Bush, nor did I vote for McCain, last year.

[Smackdown5]

You sound like a 16 year old "fucktarded imbecile". You spend way too much time on the net. You can get out of your parent's basement and find something else to do other than ranting on the net all day. You want to argue your point, the internet is not the best way. In debates its more important to listen than to talk. All you did was talk crap for 2 hrs that was miles away from the original topic.

[Smackdown5]

The gulf war was under Bush Sr. He started it. Ronald Reagan was in war with Russia. So you are wrong when you say that only Democrats are responsible for wars. That is ignorant. Bush spent all that to advance his republican agenda. But in his values, he is a conservative (gone wrong). I am fiscally conservative, but progressive. I don't cling to guns are religion like other conservative republicans do. Their Ideas are crap. After the last 8 years. You cant judge a new admin that just took power

[maxbm]

The Gulf War was one of the exceptions of Republican foreign intervention (or lack of it) in the 20th century.

Dem: World War 1, World War 2, Korean War, Vietnam War

Repub: Desert Storm

Cling to guns? You will be clinging to life if you fuck with the 2nd amendment. It's because of zombies like you that we will lose all of our rights because they think govt should protect them, not realizing why we have the right to bear arms. It was put there to ensure citizens could prevent govt tyranny.

[maxbm]

Reagan was in a war with Russia? Uh no, that was the COLD WAR which was started shortly after World War 2 in the '40s, not the '80s under Reagan.

[Smackdown5]

AND the IRAQ WAR 2003. So dont blame it all on Democrats. Its obvious you are not Independent since Ron Paul was a republican. So cut with the bull please. And what I meant with Russia, was that republican presidents also had wars while they were in office, and others created some. The cold war is an exception since it took a long time before it ended. The amendments were created a LONG TIME ago. Nobody back then gave a shit about crime rates and crazy people. Restrictions on assault weapons!

[maxbm]

The Iraq War in 2003 was in the 21st century, not the 20th century, which was the century we were discussing. Like I stated in my previous comment, the only war in the 20th century that could be attributed to a Republican was Desert Storm (George H.W. Bush) in 1991. However, that wasn't anywhere near as significant as WW1, WW2, Korea, and Vietnam, the Democrat wars.

I forgot to mention the Afghan-Soviet war which was initially covertly funded under President Carter, another Democrat, in 1979.

[Smackdown5]

In the 20th and 21st. Anyway. We can argue all day about this, but we will never agree on anything politically. I don't know how old you are, but I am going to let this go and quit arguing. In the end we want the same thing., just have opposing views and on different political spectrum. If everybody agreed on the same thing. Life would be pointless.

[maxbm]

Why would 21st century wars, such as Iraq and Afghanistan, be included in a point I was making regarding dem/repub wars in the 20th century??

No, in the end we want totally DIFFERENT things. You want a police state and oppressive government to tell you how to think and what to do. I, on the other hand, want a constitutional republic in which government lets me live my life as long as I'm not hurting anyone else.

[maxbm]

You know what else was created a long time ago? The Holy Bible. Should we burn that too, like the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights? I already explained to you why the founding fathers included the 2nd amendment - to give the citizens the means to fight an oppressive government, NOT crime or hunting.

[Smackdown5]

YES, BUT THESE DAYS THEY USE WEAPONS TO KILL PEOPLE. Why are you so fucking blind? Read what people write. Back in the day all they cared about was oppressing government. These days assault weapons are used to kill people. I am not saying to ban ALL weapons, I am saying put a restriction on assault weapons. Its a big difference.

[maxbm]

You support the aborting of fetuses and killing babies, but condemn assault rifles. The irony is overwhelming. Ha!

[Smackdown5]

Ok ENOUGH! I am sick of this pointless discussion. Its obvious republicans Fucked Up and now we can hope Obama fixes it. I believe in him just like you believe in Ron Paul. If you will excuse me, I have things to do other than debate something that went way off topic! For me democrats are better than republicans. That is my final thought.

[dale1966gto]

In a year or less, this country is going to be in such a unprecendented disaster because of Obama's radical - and I do mean RADICAL - policies, most Americans will long for the days of Reagan and the good ol' days. I, along with MILLIONS of other Americans, have a VERY uneasy feeling about that big-eared Marxist who has no experience and a blank resume'. We have no confidence in him. Practically everyone he's appointed has had to step down. Every time he opens his mouth the stock market tanks!

[feeknocks]

@dale1966gto

Obama is just accelerating Bush's policies. And yes, Bush did sprinkle socialism on health care during his term.

[Smackdown5]

And you are trapped into the right paradigm and I am sure you watch FOX Noise channel and they fill your head with crap. Obama is investing in Education, Renewable energy, Healthcare; to name a few. So when you say Obama is Bush, maybe educating yourself about what he stands for and doing a little research about how he is trying to accomplish that in your basement; then you can claim all the bullshit you just gave. He is a month old president. And I love how he is doing so far!

[Smackdown5]

I am 28 years old. And I don't give a rat's ass about what you think about comments. You have your own opinions and I have mine. Its called freedom of speech. Maybe you were the one of the dumbasses that were STILL Undecided on the last day of the election. It was obvious who was the better candidate. If I had to choose, I would choose Obama over McCain any day. McCain is Bush on steroids.

[maxbm]

28? I thought you were 16 to 18.

No, I was unequivocally decided, not undecided, on election day. I knew both Obama and McCain were bought by corporate lobbyists and special interest groups.

If you read my previous comments, you would know that I was a huge supporter of Ron Paul.

[Smackdown5]

Hey, I respect you for that. You have your own opening, and thats what America is all about. You support Ron Paul, I support Obama. We are bound to have some disagreements. So we can argue all day, but we will still have differences politically. I am going to go by the wait and see approach. I have high hopes for Obama, and am willing to give him a chance. Thats all I have to say about that.

[kultbagusa]

One good politician, just one..........