lol it came from God easy..im gonna answer in a logical way..first lets say the universe came from a place or something called "A"..before that wasn't it "A" in a universe too..let's call it "universe 2" now where did universe 2 came from? again lets say universe 2 came from a place called "B" asking again the same quest on and on..u must have a starting point and that starting point IS GOD my friend case solved -_-
What you actually call 'nothingness' before the universe we know now is a fallacy. The state of 'nothingness' was actually a form of energy in perfect balance, unified and in harmony. Like white light not actually being white but in reality composed of all colours. The universe we now know is the result of a gradual dilution and eventual separation of this energy into individual energies - creating an imbalance which has resulted in what we now call matter.
To all Atheist , you can't talk a delusional person out of delusion...look at the comments~ All of them are still stuck in their small imaginary world...Can't believe how stupid people are... We can never talk them out of it. We are trying to save them but in the end its up to them for the final step to...accept the reality that GOD is imaginary
one thing this Intelligent man has assumed that our God came from nothing, that our God isnt eternal. but thats not true. Christians believe that God is eternal or that he was always there. No human on earth can possibly wrap their minds around an eternal being. this is because in our perspective everything is finite. everything has a beginning and an end. Fortunatly we do not need to understand god to believe in him. Why would people worship an Entity that we understand?
First of all, I'm an agnostic. I think this video is somewhat irrational. Christians believe that God is eternal and that he wasn't created. According to Christian theology, nobody created God. He didn't need to poof into existence. To counter this, a skeptic should respond by saying that there are multiple scientific hypotheses that explain the origins of the universes and that a God didn't need to create the universe. God is an unproven hypothesis.
The human soul is just a created illusion/trick by the ego or self as our brian is so advanced it understands it will one day cease to function. There is no soul just as there is no real ego or emotions floating out in space. Now as a metaphor and not literally I'll give you that but besides that its basically its all in your head!
@SummerCerveza And I'm sure when all the redeemed people are taken in to the Heavens, leaving his very children to doom, God will make some =) emote in the sky like an asshole.
What a totally asinine thing to say, "By the way, if you don't believe in the thing I believe in that has no evidence whatsoever supporting it, you're going to burn for eternity =)". Get a grip
Science explains many things, but how does it explain the human soul? Did our souls crawl up from primordial muck along with flesh and bone? Such things lie in a dimension (or plane of existence) atheists haven't considered. We may indeed advance scientifically so as to explain the origin of the physical universe. But a soul isn't physical, is it? Or emotions? As you pompously deem the faithful your intellectual inferiors by playing "10 questions" with them, ask yourself that ONE question.
Much like it explains the existence of leprechauns; it doesn't make claims of things that only exist as concepts of the mind. Emotions are reactions to chemical balances in your neurological system, affected by stimuli.
Things exist in 3 demonstrable manners: concepts of the mind, physical manifestations, and in language. We know emotions are physical because we can alter chemical balances in the human brain and alter/even remove them
The universe by any means couldn't have just existed because we already have physics that say matter cannot be created or destroyed. God created this universe , and in his place that he created for himself there is no time,matter or space. You cannot tell me I am wrong because we do not have a complete understanding of physics of different realms.
@SSTriplePilipinas "I don't know something, therefore God" Nice argument there.
Not to mention, our current leading theory of understanding how the universe came in to existence, the Big Bang, doesn't say, "The universe has always been here". So, that's cool.
And I can say you are wrong, not by absolute definitions, because you are claiming something that goes against the evidence we have. You're wrong
@TheScientificTrinity Wrong. My last sentence does not have anything to do with the argument. I only said that about the Big Bang because that's how some think, not everyone. I mean to say that God is eternal, (rendering him the past, present and future), not made of matter or energy, (rendering him immaterial) in order for him to create the universe, because there is no other known explanation for the universe seed to just come into existence.
@SSTriplePilipinas There are plenty, and it's really not hard at all to come with a fantasy of, "Then something came from nowhere and created everything instantly". Our science basically destroys, to be specific, the first couple verses of Genesis (and, of course, much, much more).
Also, c'mon, e=mc2. When you were in school, or while you are going to school, don't/didn't they have those pictures of Einstein with whacky hair and him sticking his tongue out?
@TheScientificTrinity Come from nowhere? We can't really say he came from nowhere since he was to have created time...there is no point where he was created.
@SSTriplePilipinas Except you can't just say that. You can not say, "this thing existed before time, and since it existed before time, therefore it needs no creation." Well, hey, that sounds dandy, except there is a problem: if God created time, he would have to have done it before time, thus contradicting any sense of "before time". So did God exist after time? It certainly wouldn't mean a supernatural being could not exist, but now the question comes back, "who created God?"
@TheScientificTrinity Since God created time, he didn't do it 'before time' because there was no time to be defined. The definition of time is a period of change in matter - something like that. Therefore, you must have matter in order to have time, and have space for that matter. Which brings us to the point where the universe was created with space, matter and time altogether.
@SSTriplePilipinas This is where the conversation gets tricky because time, kind of, is tricky. At least to my knowledge, the concept of time being an actual property is somewhat in the air. Does m=t, better yet, is time simply an illusion? Just a means of which we measure something, that it is only a measurement, despite in any context? Perhaps. Was there always time (which simply means, that there is no actual time)?
@SSTriplePilipinas None the less, the argument is incoherent within itself. You cannot proclaim time was created without the ability for it to be have created. In order for the events to happen, time must have been present. With that, the only possible conclusion, to my knowledge, using your logic would be that the big bang created God, but when you dig in to that it is, probably, impossible, given the way we understand things.
@TheScientificTrinity Nothing. You might think that is illogical, but that idea is illogical itself. If something or someone created God, you would just keep going what created that and what created that... therefore creating a loop. I simply give ways on how God can exist.
@SSTriplePilipinas Well, no, you don't create a loop, you create a "beginning" (by any definition) that is explained through a logical explanation. Not just, "This was the beginning because it just was".
@TheScientificTrinity There is no "beginning" of God, simply put, for a thing to have a beginning and will have an end and that is still a measure of time. (which he created) Of course there is time; imagine the universe having instant matter and space; but without time it would have gone nowhere.
@SSTriplePilipinas But I honestly suggest you go talk to someone that is a part of astronomy. Well, not directly, unless you can, but there are books, etc. The science of astronomy cannot simply said, "X did it" like religions. It is not something that can be compressed, unless you really know your shit, in to 500-character comment.
@TheScientificTrinity I have realized there is an endless argument between Atheists and believers, but anyone can simply finish it all by simply saying " There is no need for us to argue because since we are human of all variety, and therefore, are subjected to the things that our lives turn to. "
Sadly, they argue of things when they should really be thinking a way to improve the human race as a species, before we finish ourselves off in means of war, hatred, and greed.
@SSTriplePilipinas Interestingly, ignorance is not bliss, and ignorance does not solve our problems, in fact, it causes problems. It shuts the doors to the questions of reality, while opening many doors that lead to foolishness.
Ridiculing ignorance, teaching why it's not okay to be ignorant, explaining what ignorance is, and teaching how to be knowledgeable is a key to a healthy society. Delusion is not.
@TheScientificTrinity Alas, this is what I mean. Religion has nothing to do with the improvement of our specie. This is an endless argument, and you can call it ignorance or even stupidity; but these are points where we block ourselves ; having prejudice is not improvement. You and I are both human, so is everyone else out there - that's why we have a chance to improve ourselves and the world.
@SSTriplePilipinas I didn't say the origin of ignorance is religion... you could even argue the origin of religion wasn't even of ignorance, but of curiosity. It's how it expanded in the past few thousands years is, indeed, ignorance and delusion. Once you become susceptible to such a vast ignorant stance, many possibilities lay ahead.
@SSTriplePilipinas It just comes down to: we do not know. It's nice to come up with hypotheses based on mere thought, or philosophical meaning, but those things aren't actual facts. Only speculation. This is why mainstream religion, and other superstitious things, are laughable. It is okay to go, "I don't know", it's not okay to go, "I don't know, let's make something up, and prevent us from knowing what really lies beyond". It's asinine.
@TheScientificTrinity That's right. This is what it ALWAYS boils down to. In the end we say "We don't know, there is no way to prove or disprove God" .
@SSTriplePilipinas Exactly, which is why I find it laughable people/societies base their life/society on particular religions, mainly the three main ones of today. It is not a healthy hole to jump down. My main point is that holding a position of absolute knowledge of anything is not a wise choice, and that skepticism is a one of the better pathways.
While I do not think deities do exist, I don't think they are impossible.
Love your channel but I had to thumbs down this. The universe has no beginning or end. It's just there like all matter is. And man has not walked on the moon. That was faked which is obvious to skeptical people.
@BinaryPill It's more like an overstatement. Science already has an explanation for the origin of the universe. It's just not complete yet. Meanwhile, if you don't believe in people and you want to explain the origin of the car, you're going to have a pretty hard time.
i wasted 5 mins of my time, he is a stupid. he thinks e=mc2 controls the nuclear energy. it doesn't control anything. it is just an old equation which is wrong,
Where did Existence come from? Now we have three ( 3) sources of the Universe: big bang , vacuum and God Which of them is correct ? =. About God: The action, when the God compressed all Universe into his palm, physicists had named –- a singular point And action, when the God opened his palm, physicists had named - the Big Bang
Before science discovered that our earth is circle the Bible tells it circle first before science discovered the life is is the blood the bible tells it first.
@pro1127 The earth is a sphere, not a circle, for one.
How do you know that when the bible says, "The life of the flesh is in the blood", it's taken literally? When the bible refers to something that's not scientifically accurate, you say it's a metaphor. Why can't we do the same?
Ouch! You were doing so well up until 3:14, and then you just lost it. In truth it's quite possible that our perception or location prevents us from ever seeing the true nature of the universe... On top of that, it's likely that either our civilization or even our species will be extinct long before we have a chance to learn the things that we are capable of learning about the universe.
This video doesn't show evidence for atheism. It only rationalizes the something-from-nothing argument made by christians, yet some just cannot accept that not every single argument they make is valid.
Nature cannot be created, for the creator of Nature must also be part of Nature itself. And this is also true for the creator of the creator. But if you say that God is not part of nature, then I'll say yea, so is the flying spaghetti monster, humpty dumpty, Santa Claus, Teletubbies and so forth..
WHy can't people accept that WE may not ever understand how GOD created us, any more than children understand how they were created, when they are 5 years old? Nor can we ultimately understand the "Plan" other than what the Scriptures tell us, which is LOVE our CREATOR, and LOVE each other. We are a computer program, rending our existance through "light", of which Jesus came, a plant within our "program".
Why does the universe need a cause, by definition it is everything that exist, so logically, it does not need a cause, as it is eternal. The universe may have not always existed in the present form, but to use supernatural explanations, it only leads to untestable explanations, that explain nothing.
@sohaibthephilosopher. I do not think the universe needs a cause, because it is all of existence, and anything outside it is non-existent, so the uncaused cause is the universe.The first cause is uncaused, and the rest are contingent on that to various extents. I do not understand all the causes of all the entirety of existence, but truly it is a fallacious question to ask what caused the universe, because it is everything that exist, which resolves this from the start.
@sohaibthephilosopher. Existence is a property of reality, that which defines what is metaphysically existent.The universe is commonly defined as the totality of everything that exists, including all space, time, matter, energy, planets, stars, galaxies, intergalactic space, and beyond. Asking what come before the universe, is a fallacy, as there is nothing before the universe. We do not know if the universe has always been physical, but its existence is eternal.
@KevZen2000 I heard that reality isn't really 'reality' ; Its an illusion .
So now I know that reality is real or there wouldn't be any existence ? If existence is a property of reality then it must also come from reality or not ?
And no universe might not be eternal . cosmic apocalypse is inevitable (according to science).
I'd say that any attempts to describe existence in words or numbers are bound to fail.
@sohaibthephilosopher. Reality is not an illusion, because illusions are fictitious entities, and reality is something that is real. Our perception of 'reality' is based on the perception of our senses, and knowledge, but we are in some defining what reality is within our limited abilities, due to finiteness.
@sohaibthephilosopher. Yes, we are finite, and we cannot understand the infinite, as it requires an infinite mind to do so, and ultimate reality is something that is impossible to understand,but we must go about it with science, and empirical results, as these present the best subjective experience of ultimate reality.
@sohaibthephilosopher.Until something better comes along, science is the best method of defining that which exist, and that which does. Anything else outside scientific investigation, we must apply a similar with the empirical nature of skeptical inquiry.
@sohaibthephilosopher. subjective experience, I do not mean the New Age version of mysticism, but more of a collective scientific investigation of the entirety of human experience, and data, within the proper method of investigation.
@KevZen2000 Yeah , too subjective to write it down ! cos words have limitations . Even numbers have limitations . (With the exception of 1 and 0)
I kinda believe that the concept of God comes through intuition rather than pure logic. I also sometimes think that even logic is intuitive . Consciousness can be questioned .
While people might argue that there is no way intuition is more epistemologically privileged than rationale but I think practical evidence supports its epistemological value.
@KevZen2000 Something must “just is,” but it can’t be our universe. Using Einstein’s relativity, I prove that that is the case. Insert into Google "Donald Schneider, proof of a creator” to read for free. It should be the first hit. It takes about ten minutes. If you feel you can rebut it, email me and I shall post your rebuttal on my website if it has any merit.
@MrNickape yes but its easy to find evidence in this world of worldly things, you must remember God is not of this world he created it, watch this simple truth. we are proof that god exists. this is not a man in the cloud that has certain views just the basic understanding of a higher being because i have been created out of knowledge (DNA) & knowledge must be held by a host. i hope you find God. I can put my life on the fact that he is here
This is the issue, u think God is a man and as a man you can not accept another being higher than u due to our pride i feel that. God created skin and limbs he is not of skin and limbs. do u think watches think they wernt created or they randomly came into being... no... why... they are not self concious, the very truth that is WE can even PONDER such a possibility should tell you something nice. Once you realise God is not a person and is definatley something you can not IMAGIne you can believe
GOD IS THE NATURAL PROCESS, WHAT IS WITH SCIENTISTS, CAN THEY NOT SEE THEY ARE DISCOVERING HOW THE WORLD WORKS NOT DISCOVERING GOD DOESNT EXIST. TIME IS OF THIS WORLD AND IS A MEASURE THAT INVOLVES OUR PLANETS AND THE SUN, YOU CAN NOT MEASURE TIME OUT SIDE OF THIS ZONE BECAUSE THERE IS NO TIME, TIME ARGUMENT IS WACK
@SUPERSILVERH8ORADE Science has to show where the universe came from. So far, it came up with no intelligent being. In fact, intelligent beings (aka people) consist of 0.0000000000000000000000000000000000000001% of all the matter in the universe.
If God did in fact create the universe, science will eventually figure it out.
Topics: WINNING ARGUMENTS NOW ADDED For The Creationism-Evolutionism Debate (See Subchapter 10.2.2.), The Issue On The Criminal Liability Of Foretelling The END OF THE WORLD, Other Debated Issues, Terrorism, War, Law, Politics, Religion, Philosophy, Science, Others.
Websites: balanceddiet1.yolasite.com
See Figure 4, which is THE MEANING OF THE PYRAMID, at figure4etc.yolasite.com
See Announcements at announcements-balancedway.weebly.com
the problem with that is that science is based on not knowing something- and then using what we already know, discover the mystery of what we needed to learn and then using that new knowledge to discover something else.
religion (christiantiy) on the other hand cant explain any of these natural occuring events so simply makes up a story and a name for these events and convinced primitive man to believe in it.
Is a human being is imaginary? Look at all cars, computers... all of them are working in accordance with law of nature like: F=M*A. I have not seen any scientific formulae like:
It does: It doesn't say it directly but it does insinuate it Daniel 4:11, Matthew 4:8, Isaiah 40:22, Job 38:44, Job 38:44, Job 38:13, 38:14 You have to be very thick to not see how they insinuate the earth is flat!
Sorry, but YOU are very much mistaken my brainwashed son
So ur sayin' that because man discovered certain things he will discover at some point the origin of the universe ? ...like cm-om the universe started from nothing and it evolved/changed/transforemd ....if not ..then explain this : if the universe began with the Big Bang or whatever...how did that planet get there -_- ... was it created by countless little rocks that melted together ? The awnswer might be yes ... if it is yes then how did those little rocks get there ? and it goes on and on
Constantly asking "Where did THAT come from" is like being a little kid at a shop, and when you ask your mother if you can have a candy bar, she says no. Then you constantly ask "Why?" to everything. IT GETS ANNOYING!
The "Something from nothing" argument has been debunked LOADS of times and it's sad how christians still use it.
All this debating on youtube isn't whether or not God exists. It's whether or not we can finally convince theists we are right. :)
Whenever we say the origin of this is something else, it appears they can say "Where did THAT come from?" and then it turns out it's no good, and it looks like something from nothing is impossible. But I know a way around this.
Suppose there is nothing. We can always ask questions, like "How many objects are in existence?". The answer is ZERO. Now ask the question, and the answer is ONE since the one object is "zero" and then it becomes two (0 and 1) and so on to infinity. *cont.*
*cont.* Now we know natural numbers exist. One dimension is known, which is t0. An infinite amount of t0 units lead to a t1 unit. In one t1 unit, a countably infinite amount of new numbers are created. This is a 2 dimensional graph where t0 units lead to t1 units. The original graph is t1 = t0 + 1. Then areas under curves and volumes form the t2 unit, or the third dimension (note that space is still finitely divisible so curves aren't real curves). *cont.*
*cont.* Then an uncountably infinite amount of t2 units (or third dimension) account for all the units under the t3 dimension. The t0, t1, t2, and t3 units make up the 4 dimensions of spacetime. The reason one of those had to be time is so the speed of light is the same relative to everyone.
Now if you notice on the original t1 graph, the "points" at t0 and t1 values are actually two-dimensional which means entities are 2-D which is what M-theory states.
Agnosticism isn't the only logical answer, it is the pussiest answer ever. Because you are too scared to chose either side.
What you are saying is that we shouldn't say that God isn't real because it is possible for a magical being to exist outside of existence that can telepathically communicate to everyone in the world at once. Then you think it is logical that there is 2 places where everyone goes to when they die and live there for eternity. Plus stupider stuff.
@soadpwnsyouAtheism cannot answer the question as to why existence itself exists. A fetus does not exist until after his or her parents have had relations. You appear to argue that a (metaphorical) fetus can just suddenly be (from nonexistence) without a cause, or else always existed, without explaining how either is possible. Until you can provide some logical answer, then atheism is untenable. You simply don't know.
@soadpwnsyouAh! Ah! I see you have been reading *Thirty Days to a Better Vocabulary.* Please get back to me when you finish the first week. Are you In actuality a confirmed believer posing as an atheist in an effort to discredit the philosophy? Interesting. Indeed, the sacrifices one must make in support of one’s cause.
@soadpwnsyou No, I know there is no magic {on Earth} and there isn't evidence of anything beyond the capacity of nature {in what we have explored}. You can't just skip details of location and span of investigation just to suit yourself in claims of knowledge, you are "knowing through faith" just as much as they are. It is like if I were to tell you I {know} penguins aren't real just because there aren't any in my basement.
I am not knowing through faith... why would I have faith in not believe in something. Only religious people say they have faith in a god. There is no god, there is no evidence for god, there will never be evidence because he isn't real.
Your penguin analogy doesn't work at all you fucking retard. All of you people are exactly the same, provide no evidence for something you believe in and then call everyone else idiots.
@soadpwnsyou Okay belligerent little shit, you are {taking faith} that the qualities that have been observed to support you are consistent within the entire universe and potentially beyond.
The penguin analogy is proper, and your ad hominem doesn't prove otherwise.
Atheism - WITHOUT GOD
Antitheism- AGAINST GOD
You are antitheistic, so please stop associating your injustified closed minded hate-filled diarrhea with atheism.
Real atheists don't like it at all, & we're going to start saying so.
Saying that you know penguins don't exist because you haven't seen one is not the same as saying god is not real because there is no evidence at all (anywhere).
Penguins exist because you can go see one, they are at zoos, there is evidence that they exist.
God has not existence.
This is why your fucking analogy fails.
God isn't real because he isn't real. Until someone has proven that god is real. Atheists are 100% correct; fact.
@soadpwnsyou I am facepalming so hard right now. Analogies aren't supposed to be literal. It was a depiction of a proposed circumstance in such a way you are doing.
I was suggesting that if I pulled out of my ass a "fact" of {absolute} non-existence of a certain thing, by only the assessment of a {limited} area, it wouldn't really be a {fact} at all.
You are not less agnostic than anyone else. You don't {know} there is no evidence at all {anywhere}, because we have not investigated {EVERYWHERE}
I am not agnostic, I know god isn't real because it is an impossibility and there is nothing to support the existence of a god.
Your analogy fails
You were saying that since someone hasn't seen a penguin they don't believe in it. That is foolish because there is actual evidence of the penguin and they can go see one.
But you were trying to make that work with my disbelief in god. Though you can't test god at all because he isn't real. There is nothing you can do to prove a god right.
@soadpwnsyou No, "fucking idiot," SPECIFIC CONCEPTS OF GOD are what can't exist by logic and nature. We could make an infinite amount of concepts of deities that can't be proven or disproven.
How do you propose we ever investigate whether there's anything beyond our universe, much less "know" that laws of nature would apply in such a place? Like a parallel dimension or some such?
If you think you're truly not agnostic, then you're {delusional}.
@soadpwnsyou {Invisible} and {Pink} are {Contradicting} qualities. Use your head. There can be plenty of ideas of god that don't contradict itself nor our existence.
No no no... he is invisible but when you die you see that he is pink. (This is how every religion works, they make up excuses when they have contradictions) I put a contradiction in it to show you how religion says they are always right.
It is funny how you say you are delusional if you are not agnostic. Agnostic are just pussies that are just as stupid as religious people. You honestly think that there is a possibility of a creator that has infinite magic and wisdom.
I like the thought of going to heaven and being in eternal bliss but I know it isn't real.
I wish god was real, but guess what he isn't real.
I wish magic was real, but guess what it isn't real.
Basically you don't support anyone that chooses a side and you pussy out and try to act like you are the smart one. You are on your own then. Stop being a fagot hipster pussy and just go with what you actually think. Or is your brain too damn slow to chose.
@soadpwnsyou This makes your delusion and BIGOTRY apparent. You ARROGANTLY FLAME people who refuse to "go with what they think" and instead "go with what they know" and what I know is that I DON'T KNOW, AND NEITHER DO YOU.
You know what else I know? You're the one that's the hipster tool here.
The fact that many concept originate from imagination, has absolutely no bearing on the knowledge of whether such a thing is real, in UNLIMITED CONTEXT. "Unknown" is not an embarassing thing in science.
@soadpwnsyou And you're some kind of smear politician wannabe. To anyone with a rational head, it is clear you are the idiot, because you just keep repeating yourself with your childish insults no matter what, to keep {your beliefs} looking like they're valid.
What do I believe? This makes it so obvious you are not paying attention. You are the one with a belief. I {know} that the knowledge on this matter is not available. Not a belief.
You're a bigot because you hate instead of respect.
You are repeating the same thing too, that is what an argument is. You can't provide infinite ideas into a youtube argument.
Respect is earned... and anyone on youtube has not earned it. I don't give respect unless someone is very respectful back. It goes both way.
You have a belief too of not believe in or believing in a god. Which also makes you a bigot for saying everyone is wrong except you. That is the epitome of bigotry.
@soadpwnsyou Oh, I see it, you threw me around to confuse faith with belief.
Okay then, I'll say that I am very confident in my belief and believe that you ought to be too because this belief is the only one that is based on true knowledge. Please type define:knowledge in google so we avoid further misunderstanding.
I am not intolerant to anybody's particular comfort in {faith} in way of {hope} in whatever supernatural force or lack thereof- I'm just disapproving of ignorance of knowledge.
I like how you call me names and then you go back on it and become a huge dumbass.
You say you use knowledge but the only thing you said was that you can't know for certain, that isn't knowledge at all. That is just saying well fuck it, it is impossible to prove or disprove.
That isn't knowledge that is just acting like you are awesome and telling everyone they are wrong because you are the master of knowledge.
@soadpwnsyou I didn't say we {can't} know, I said we {don't} know, and that's the truth.
It IS knowledge to know that we DO NOT HAVE certain knowledge.
And you didn't even answer when I asked how do you propose we explore the potential outside our universe. Thats not necessarily implying such a thing is impossible, but its at least WAY beyond our ability for the time being.
You're being very hypocritical in acting you are awesome and telling me wrong.
@soadpwnsyou Really, if anyone should get the fuck off the internet, it's you, preferably to seek help for your insanity. You refuse to learn anything, your idea of debate is using every fallacy in order to "win," give a bad name for atheists, purposefully piss off theists, influence those who are entertained by trolling, a quality conditioned by "the cesspool of the internet," to be bigoted and hateful and avoidant of rational thought. You will not succeed in making hell on earth, sociopath.
I refuse to learn... except for that I look for knowledge more and more everyday. The more I learn, the more I do not believe in superstitious religious deities.
You call me a troll, except that you came on this video and found my comment and responded because you were angry.
Give a bad name for atheists? I just told atheists on facebook about you and everyone laughed at you.
You call me a sociopath and insane for saying you are wrong. You are truly delusional.
I put that in there to see if you only commented on the kill yourself part. which you did and provided no further argument about what we started
I did this to show how you are now not arguing your point because you know that you have nothing logical to say and will only point out anything that is wrong in the argument whether it be cursing, violence or anger
So you proved my point and you decided to cease your argument, but now that I point this out you will try to go back and act smart
@soadpwnsyou Last bit of advice, if you and your "facebook group" really advocate seeking knowledge, you would be far less likely to turn the people who genuinely know more than you away from sharing by disgust of your "feigned arrogance." That really just doesn't make sense. I would hope also you've been sharing the revelations and epiphanies about your state of mind as well other than leaving it as an out of context part of our correspondence that you oh so smart people found entertaining.
What is the point of you trying to show everyone that only agnosticism is the way to go and everyone else is wrong.
Explain to me how in our universe the idea of a deity is even possible.
Remember, a deity is something that created the universe. This means is has to exist outside of the universe before the universe was created. It would have had to exist before time, space and anything.
Why do you care so much about telling everyone to not voice their opinion?
@soadpwnsyou Its not the opinion, it is your attitude and how you express your opinion as fact.
Last benefit of the doubt for you:
Why are you so convinced that something existing outside of our universe prior to the existence of our universe, whether it be something involved with the creation with our universe or not, is impossible?
Honest scientists and theorists will say nothing is certain, even if you have their backing on the concept of time is tied to our universe. Our scope is limited.
But majority of stop scientists are atheists, this means that they reject the idea of a deity.
Again I never said that nothing helped in the process of what created the universe.
I am saying that an all powerful, all wise, supernatural, magic, infinite being cannot exist (this is a deity). It is outside of any scientific law that has been created.
Why are you so hell bent on proving that we cannot prove or disprove anything?
@soadpwnsyou But they reject it because of the lack of evidence. This is not the same thing as being absolutely certain of the absence of any possibility of it. Look into solipsism and you see why absolute certainty can't be done at all even.
That's a specific idea of a deity. Deity just denotes divine being, and divinity equates to supernatural. We really cannot tell whether there are places where our laws of nature don't apply in.
Because ignorance is bad, I put an explanation w/o @you below.
This is why I really don't like your logic. You said that absolute certainty can't be done at all.
I hope you are not like the last person that I talked to who said, hey would could all be computer programs. He was referring to the Matrix and saying that it could be our existence. Because we can't absolutely prove or disprove anything.
Your logic is based on that you have a small belief that anything at all is possible even words turning into fish. Your logic fails.
@soadpwnsyou Think about how it is you know it is absolutely certain that words will never turn into fish. It would be because we never observed such a thing and have a long history of never observing such a thing. Expecting uniform consistency throughout the entirety of time is actually a fallacy. We can make {predictions} that it'll never happen and it is accepted because it is beyond reasonable doubt. But the doubt is never completely removed. It is {miniscule} but it is there nonetheless.
I will go on still being an atheist until there is some shred of evidence.
So far things are impossible to happen, but we haven't experienced the entirety of the universe or things like black holes. For all you know black holes could take us to another dimension with different outcomes of our own lives/physics.
I will never 100% disprove anything, but I still don't believe in it.
Your logic isn't actually bad it is just me saying things to see if you crack.
@soadpwnsyou I can respect that, and I'm glad to hear you are not as you showed..Be mindful though that I can't really condone a trick like that outside of PMs, these comment forums are "public" and you have the capacity to play a bad influence to impressionable people (not necessarily just kids but anyone lacking mental maturity despite age) by your exhibited confidence, not knowing about smear, fallacy and stereotypes. I'm sure you wouldn't teach your own kids this way, so control yourself pls
It is youtube so my idea of an argument is no rules lol.
In real life I am very nice to people and have long conversations
I did ask an atheist day at my school and talked to 2 people for about 2 hours
It is a way of taking on a new character that I don't get to do in real life, it is fun. Feeds my hunger for acting and provides great responses from people.
I am also doing a study (independent) on how people react when faced with aggression on the internet.
@soadpwnsyou Everyone turns into some sort of Voltaire to parrot you to demonstrate the undesirability? Shouldn't that be showing you that you really are exacerbating aggressive attitudes over an otherwise fantastic communication medium?
lol it came from God easy..im gonna answer in a logical way..first lets say the universe came from a place or something called "A"..before that wasn't it "A" in a universe too..let's call it "universe 2" now where did universe 2 came from? again lets say universe 2 came from a place called "B" asking again the same quest on and on..u must have a starting point and that starting point IS GOD my friend case solved -_-
elielkhoury90 19 hours ago in playlist Uploaded videos
This has been flagged as spam show
What you actually call 'nothingness' before the universe we know now is a fallacy. The state of 'nothingness' was actually a form of energy in perfect balance, unified and in harmony. Like white light not actually being white but in reality composed of all colours. The universe we now know is the result of a gradual dilution and eventual separation of this energy into individual energies - creating an imbalance which has resulted in what we now call matter.
Consider your question answered.
snaek29 1 week ago
@SCLARK2112 Dipshit. Go die--your stupidity annoys us all.
salviab123 2 weeks ago
god created us not univerires
SCLARK2112 2 weeks ago
To all Atheist , you can't talk a delusional person out of delusion...look at the comments~ All of them are still stuck in their small imaginary world...Can't believe how stupid people are... We can never talk them out of it. We are trying to save them but in the end its up to them for the final step to...accept the reality that GOD is imaginary
CCPJAYLPHAN1994 2 weeks ago in playlist Uploaded videos
@CCPJAYLPHAN1994 You are right, but can the quitter talk. Surely we can develop some sort of highly specific antipsychotic drugs.
Snakepliskinist 2 days ago
@Snakepliskinist Well, yeah~ Let's work together~ haha
CCPJAYLPHAN1994 2 days ago
@themrspam looks like someone got brainwashed as a child...
MaggotBrothers 2 weeks ago
god didnt appear.he is everlasting. infinity.
our mind is too small to acknowledge this, so we will just dismiss it.
TheMrSpam 3 weeks ago
@TheMrSpam So what IS god?
MrComplainalot 3 weeks ago
@MrComplainalot
i do not have the autority or the mood to answer that question for you, but i know what god is for me.
if i answer that question i am simply sharing my view of things, and the way i think the world works.
it is up to yourself to experience what definition you can give God in your life.
TheMrSpam 3 weeks ago
one thing this Intelligent man has assumed that our God came from nothing, that our God isnt eternal. but thats not true. Christians believe that God is eternal or that he was always there. No human on earth can possibly wrap their minds around an eternal being. this is because in our perspective everything is finite. everything has a beginning and an end. Fortunatly we do not need to understand god to believe in him. Why would people worship an Entity that we understand?
RunningGenesis 1 month ago in playlist More videos from GIIVideo
First of all, I'm an agnostic. I think this video is somewhat irrational. Christians believe that God is eternal and that he wasn't created. According to Christian theology, nobody created God. He didn't need to poof into existence. To counter this, a skeptic should respond by saying that there are multiple scientific hypotheses that explain the origins of the universes and that a God didn't need to create the universe. God is an unproven hypothesis.
Nashhinton 1 month ago
The human soul is just a created illusion/trick by the ego or self as our brian is so advanced it understands it will one day cease to function. There is no soul just as there is no real ego or emotions floating out in space. Now as a metaphor and not literally I'll give you that but besides that its basically its all in your head!
APLSURVIVOR 1 month ago
hope you could find all the explanations and prove them before the Judgement day comes.. =)
SummerCerveza 1 month ago
@SummerCerveza And I'm sure when all the redeemed people are taken in to the Heavens, leaving his very children to doom, God will make some =) emote in the sky like an asshole.
What a totally asinine thing to say, "By the way, if you don't believe in the thing I believe in that has no evidence whatsoever supporting it, you're going to burn for eternity =)". Get a grip
TheScientificTrinity 1 month ago
Science explains many things, but how does it explain the human soul? Did our souls crawl up from primordial muck along with flesh and bone? Such things lie in a dimension (or plane of existence) atheists haven't considered. We may indeed advance scientifically so as to explain the origin of the physical universe. But a soul isn't physical, is it? Or emotions? As you pompously deem the faithful your intellectual inferiors by playing "10 questions" with them, ask yourself that ONE question.
ascender555 2 months ago
@ascender555 souls dont exist. emotions are regulated by your hormonal and neurological systems.
toSTONEiGO 1 month ago in playlist More videos from GIIVideo
@ascender555
"..,but how does it explain the human soul?"
_
Much like it explains the existence of leprechauns; it doesn't make claims of things that only exist as concepts of the mind. Emotions are reactions to chemical balances in your neurological system, affected by stimuli.
Things exist in 3 demonstrable manners: concepts of the mind, physical manifestations, and in language. We know emotions are physical because we can alter chemical balances in the human brain and alter/even remove them
D34dH053 1 month ago in playlist More videos from GIIVideo
The universe by any means couldn't have just existed because we already have physics that say matter cannot be created or destroyed. God created this universe , and in his place that he created for himself there is no time,matter or space. You cannot tell me I am wrong because we do not have a complete understanding of physics of different realms.
SSTriplePilipinas 2 months ago
@SSTriplePilipinas "I don't know something, therefore God" Nice argument there.
Not to mention, our current leading theory of understanding how the universe came in to existence, the Big Bang, doesn't say, "The universe has always been here". So, that's cool.
And I can say you are wrong, not by absolute definitions, because you are claiming something that goes against the evidence we have. You're wrong
TheScientificTrinity 1 month ago
@TheScientificTrinity Wrong. My last sentence does not have anything to do with the argument. I only said that about the Big Bang because that's how some think, not everyone. I mean to say that God is eternal, (rendering him the past, present and future), not made of matter or energy, (rendering him immaterial) in order for him to create the universe, because there is no other known explanation for the universe seed to just come into existence.
SSTriplePilipinas 1 month ago
@SSTriplePilipinas There are plenty, and it's really not hard at all to come with a fantasy of, "Then something came from nowhere and created everything instantly". Our science basically destroys, to be specific, the first couple verses of Genesis (and, of course, much, much more).
Also, c'mon, e=mc2. When you were in school, or while you are going to school, don't/didn't they have those pictures of Einstein with whacky hair and him sticking his tongue out?
TheScientificTrinity 1 month ago
@TheScientificTrinity Come from nowhere? We can't really say he came from nowhere since he was to have created time...there is no point where he was created.
SSTriplePilipinas 1 month ago
@SSTriplePilipinas Except you can't just say that. You can not say, "this thing existed before time, and since it existed before time, therefore it needs no creation." Well, hey, that sounds dandy, except there is a problem: if God created time, he would have to have done it before time, thus contradicting any sense of "before time". So did God exist after time? It certainly wouldn't mean a supernatural being could not exist, but now the question comes back, "who created God?"
TheScientificTrinity 1 month ago
@TheScientificTrinity Since God created time, he didn't do it 'before time' because there was no time to be defined. The definition of time is a period of change in matter - something like that. Therefore, you must have matter in order to have time, and have space for that matter. Which brings us to the point where the universe was created with space, matter and time altogether.
SSTriplePilipinas 1 month ago
@SSTriplePilipinas This is where the conversation gets tricky because time, kind of, is tricky. At least to my knowledge, the concept of time being an actual property is somewhat in the air. Does m=t, better yet, is time simply an illusion? Just a means of which we measure something, that it is only a measurement, despite in any context? Perhaps. Was there always time (which simply means, that there is no actual time)?
TheScientificTrinity 1 month ago
@SSTriplePilipinas None the less, the argument is incoherent within itself. You cannot proclaim time was created without the ability for it to be have created. In order for the events to happen, time must have been present. With that, the only possible conclusion, to my knowledge, using your logic would be that the big bang created God, but when you dig in to that it is, probably, impossible, given the way we understand things.
TheScientificTrinity 1 month ago
@SSTriplePilipinas Actually, I need to rephrase what I posted a few minutes ago: what created God?
TheScientificTrinity 1 month ago
@TheScientificTrinity Nothing. You might think that is illogical, but that idea is illogical itself. If something or someone created God, you would just keep going what created that and what created that... therefore creating a loop. I simply give ways on how God can exist.
SSTriplePilipinas 1 month ago
@SSTriplePilipinas Well, no, you don't create a loop, you create a "beginning" (by any definition) that is explained through a logical explanation. Not just, "This was the beginning because it just was".
TheScientificTrinity 1 month ago
@TheScientificTrinity There is no "beginning" of God, simply put, for a thing to have a beginning and will have an end and that is still a measure of time. (which he created) Of course there is time; imagine the universe having instant matter and space; but without time it would have gone nowhere.
SSTriplePilipinas 1 month ago
@SSTriplePilipinas But I honestly suggest you go talk to someone that is a part of astronomy. Well, not directly, unless you can, but there are books, etc. The science of astronomy cannot simply said, "X did it" like religions. It is not something that can be compressed, unless you really know your shit, in to 500-character comment.
TheScientificTrinity 1 month ago
@TheScientificTrinity I have realized there is an endless argument between Atheists and believers, but anyone can simply finish it all by simply saying " There is no need for us to argue because since we are human of all variety, and therefore, are subjected to the things that our lives turn to. "
Sadly, they argue of things when they should really be thinking a way to improve the human race as a species, before we finish ourselves off in means of war, hatred, and greed.
SSTriplePilipinas 1 month ago
@SSTriplePilipinas Interestingly, ignorance is not bliss, and ignorance does not solve our problems, in fact, it causes problems. It shuts the doors to the questions of reality, while opening many doors that lead to foolishness.
Ridiculing ignorance, teaching why it's not okay to be ignorant, explaining what ignorance is, and teaching how to be knowledgeable is a key to a healthy society. Delusion is not.
TheScientificTrinity 1 month ago
@TheScientificTrinity Alas, this is what I mean. Religion has nothing to do with the improvement of our specie. This is an endless argument, and you can call it ignorance or even stupidity; but these are points where we block ourselves ; having prejudice is not improvement. You and I are both human, so is everyone else out there - that's why we have a chance to improve ourselves and the world.
SSTriplePilipinas 1 month ago
@SSTriplePilipinas I didn't say the origin of ignorance is religion... you could even argue the origin of religion wasn't even of ignorance, but of curiosity. It's how it expanded in the past few thousands years is, indeed, ignorance and delusion. Once you become susceptible to such a vast ignorant stance, many possibilities lay ahead.
TheScientificTrinity 1 month ago
@SSTriplePilipinas It just comes down to: we do not know. It's nice to come up with hypotheses based on mere thought, or philosophical meaning, but those things aren't actual facts. Only speculation. This is why mainstream religion, and other superstitious things, are laughable. It is okay to go, "I don't know", it's not okay to go, "I don't know, let's make something up, and prevent us from knowing what really lies beyond". It's asinine.
TheScientificTrinity 1 month ago
@TheScientificTrinity That's right. This is what it ALWAYS boils down to. In the end we say "We don't know, there is no way to prove or disprove God" .
Ahem.. *agnosticism* cough .
End.
SSTriplePilipinas 1 month ago
@SSTriplePilipinas Exactly, which is why I find it laughable people/societies base their life/society on particular religions, mainly the three main ones of today. It is not a healthy hole to jump down. My main point is that holding a position of absolute knowledge of anything is not a wise choice, and that skepticism is a one of the better pathways.
While I do not think deities do exist, I don't think they are impossible.
TheScientificTrinity 1 month ago
@TheScientificTrinity Well, of course. COUGH...oops. It seems I have coughed up part of my well being.
SSTriplePilipinas 1 month ago
@henrybird Nice strawman!
anticorncob6 2 months ago
Why am I seeing so many innocent comments being flagged as spam? Is it something you do when voting down or replying isn't enough?
anticorncob6 2 months ago
Love your channel but I had to thumbs down this. The universe has no beginning or end. It's just there like all matter is. And man has not walked on the moon. That was faked which is obvious to skeptical people.
howitzer24 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@KHfan1351 Evolution is a part of science.
AtheismIsCorrect 2 months ago
LoL! Science doesn't know after "millions of year"
your a retard
What came first the chicken or the egg?
mspartan17 2 months ago in playlist More videos from GIIVideo
What about Jews..?
DoreoC 2 months ago in playlist More videos from GIIVideo
"It may be SEVERAL DECADES before we completely understand the origin of the universe" is a probably a big understatement.
BinaryPill 2 months ago
@BinaryPill It's more like an overstatement. Science already has an explanation for the origin of the universe. It's just not complete yet. Meanwhile, if you don't believe in people and you want to explain the origin of the car, you're going to have a pretty hard time.
AtheismIsCorrect 2 months ago
i wasted 5 mins of my time, he is a stupid. he thinks e=mc2 controls the nuclear energy. it doesn't control anything. it is just an old equation which is wrong,
TheSivagajan 3 months ago
@TheSivagajan I do hope you are joking.
BinaryPill 2 months ago
socratus1 3 months ago
Before science discovered that our earth is circle the Bible tells it circle first before science discovered the life is is the blood the bible tells it first.
pro1127 3 months ago in playlist More videos from GIIVideo
@pro1127 The earth is a sphere, not a circle, for one.
How do you know that when the bible says, "The life of the flesh is in the blood", it's taken literally? When the bible refers to something that's not scientifically accurate, you say it's a metaphor. Why can't we do the same?
AtheismIsCorrect 2 months ago
@AtheismIsCorrect 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 and a b c d e f g h i number 1 and A is the root of all!!! we have a root thats why we have our universe!!1
pro1127 2 months ago
Ouch! You were doing so well up until 3:14, and then you just lost it. In truth it's quite possible that our perception or location prevents us from ever seeing the true nature of the universe... On top of that, it's likely that either our civilization or even our species will be extinct long before we have a chance to learn the things that we are capable of learning about the universe.
skoockum 4 months ago
Wouldn't the easy answer be the all powerful god created it?
robcola1997 4 months ago
Now come on,,, If natural process created Universe then, THAT Natural process IS God... see the word CREATION?
32lab 4 months ago in playlist More videos from GIIVideo
This video doesn't show evidence for atheism. It only rationalizes the something-from-nothing argument made by christians, yet some just cannot accept that not every single argument they make is valid.
anticorncob6 4 months ago
@alfredanglican
Nature cannot be created, for the creator of Nature must also be part of Nature itself. And this is also true for the creator of the creator. But if you say that God is not part of nature, then I'll say yea, so is the flying spaghetti monster, humpty dumpty, Santa Claus, Teletubbies and so forth..
remoraid7 4 months ago
Comment removed
Vlaxerman343 4 months ago
WHy can't people accept that WE may not ever understand how GOD created us, any more than children understand how they were created, when they are 5 years old? Nor can we ultimately understand the "Plan" other than what the Scriptures tell us, which is LOVE our CREATOR, and LOVE each other. We are a computer program, rending our existance through "light", of which Jesus came, a plant within our "program".
alfredanglican 4 months ago
Why does the universe need a cause, by definition it is everything that exist, so logically, it does not need a cause, as it is eternal. The universe may have not always existed in the present form, but to use supernatural explanations, it only leads to untestable explanations, that explain nothing.
KevZen2000 5 months ago 2
@KevZen2000
You want the ''cause'' of the universe needing a cause ?
So here you go. You cannot deny cause. This is circular logic.It doesn't ends anywhere.
sohaibthephilosopher 4 months ago
@sohaibthephilosopher. I do not think the universe needs a cause, because it is all of existence, and anything outside it is non-existent, so the uncaused cause is the universe.The first cause is uncaused, and the rest are contingent on that to various extents. I do not understand all the causes of all the entirety of existence, but truly it is a fallacious question to ask what caused the universe, because it is everything that exist, which resolves this from the start.
KevZen2000 4 months ago
@KevZen2000
Can you define existence ?
What is the proof that you can give that the universe is all that exists when you cannot even define in specific terms what existence is ?
sohaibthephilosopher 4 months ago
@sohaibthephilosopher. Existence is a property of reality, that which defines what is metaphysically existent.The universe is commonly defined as the totality of everything that exists, including all space, time, matter, energy, planets, stars, galaxies, intergalactic space, and beyond. Asking what come before the universe, is a fallacy, as there is nothing before the universe. We do not know if the universe has always been physical, but its existence is eternal.
KevZen2000 4 months ago
@KevZen2000 I heard that reality isn't really 'reality' ; Its an illusion .
So now I know that reality is real or there wouldn't be any existence ? If existence is a property of reality then it must also come from reality or not ?
And no universe might not be eternal . cosmic apocalypse is inevitable (according to science).
I'd say that any attempts to describe existence in words or numbers are bound to fail.
sohaibthephilosopher 4 months ago
@sohaibthephilosopher. Reality is not an illusion, because illusions are fictitious entities, and reality is something that is real. Our perception of 'reality' is based on the perception of our senses, and knowledge, but we are in some defining what reality is within our limited abilities, due to finiteness.
KevZen2000 4 months ago
@KevZen2000
So isn't it correct that we have limited perception of reality and hence our denial of ultimate cause/reality might not be valid ?
sohaibthephilosopher 4 months ago
@sohaibthephilosopher. Yes, we are finite, and we cannot understand the infinite, as it requires an infinite mind to do so, and ultimate reality is something that is impossible to understand,but we must go about it with science, and empirical results, as these present the best subjective experience of ultimate reality.
KevZen2000 4 months ago
@sohaibthephilosopher.Until something better comes along, science is the best method of defining that which exist, and that which does. Anything else outside scientific investigation, we must apply a similar with the empirical nature of skeptical inquiry.
KevZen2000 4 months ago
@sohaibthephilosopher. subjective experience, I do not mean the New Age version of mysticism, but more of a collective scientific investigation of the entirety of human experience, and data, within the proper method of investigation.
KevZen2000 4 months ago
@KevZen2000 Yeah , too subjective to write it down ! cos words have limitations . Even numbers have limitations . (With the exception of 1 and 0)
I kinda believe that the concept of God comes through intuition rather than pure logic. I also sometimes think that even logic is intuitive . Consciousness can be questioned .
While people might argue that there is no way intuition is more epistemologically privileged than rationale but I think practical evidence supports its epistemological value.
sohaibthephilosopher 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@sohaibthephilosopher The original cause is nothing.
AtheismIsCorrect 2 months ago
@KevZen2000 most logical answer i have ever seen
utiledonotenter 4 months ago in playlist More videos from GIIVideo
@utiledonotenter please tell me you're being sarcastic?
xShann0nZx 4 months ago
@KevZen2000 Something must “just is,” but it can’t be our universe. Using Einstein’s relativity, I prove that that is the case. Insert into Google "Donald Schneider, proof of a creator” to read for free. It should be the first hit. It takes about ten minutes. If you feel you can rebut it, email me and I shall post your rebuttal on my website if it has any merit.
litwriter100 2 months ago
@MrNickape yes but its easy to find evidence in this world of worldly things, you must remember God is not of this world he created it, watch this simple truth. we are proof that god exists. this is not a man in the cloud that has certain views just the basic understanding of a higher being because i have been created out of knowledge (DNA) & knowledge must be held by a host. i hope you find God. I can put my life on the fact that he is here
SUPERSILVERH8ORADE 5 months ago
This is the issue, u think God is a man and as a man you can not accept another being higher than u due to our pride i feel that. God created skin and limbs he is not of skin and limbs. do u think watches think they wernt created or they randomly came into being... no... why... they are not self concious, the very truth that is WE can even PONDER such a possibility should tell you something nice. Once you realise God is not a person and is definatley something you can not IMAGIne you can believe
SUPERSILVERH8ORADE 5 months ago
GOD IS THE NATURAL PROCESS, WHAT IS WITH SCIENTISTS, CAN THEY NOT SEE THEY ARE DISCOVERING HOW THE WORLD WORKS NOT DISCOVERING GOD DOESNT EXIST. TIME IS OF THIS WORLD AND IS A MEASURE THAT INVOLVES OUR PLANETS AND THE SUN, YOU CAN NOT MEASURE TIME OUT SIDE OF THIS ZONE BECAUSE THERE IS NO TIME, TIME ARGUMENT IS WACK
SUPERSILVERH8ORADE 5 months ago
@SUPERSILVERH8ORADE Science has to show where the universe came from. So far, it came up with no intelligent being. In fact, intelligent beings (aka people) consist of 0.0000000000000000000000000000000000000001% of all the matter in the universe.
If God did in fact create the universe, science will eventually figure it out.
anticorncob6 4 months ago
@MrNickape do you really only believe what your eyes can see?
SUPERSILVERH8ORADE 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NEW BOOK (DONATED) FOR DEBATES AND GOVERNANCE
Topics: WINNING ARGUMENTS NOW ADDED For The Creationism-Evolutionism Debate (See Subchapter 10.2.2.), The Issue On The Criminal Liability Of Foretelling The END OF THE WORLD, Other Debated Issues, Terrorism, War, Law, Politics, Religion, Philosophy, Science, Others.
Websites: balanceddiet1.yolasite.com
See Figure 4, which is THE MEANING OF THE PYRAMID, at figure4etc.yolasite.com
See Announcements at announcements-balancedway.weebly.com
etc.
TheServiceWeb 5 months ago
lol "this not knowing is normal for science" sounds exactly like the "christian excuses" you drill apon .. dare i say hypocritical ?
1337crazer 6 months ago
@1337crazer
the problem with that is that science is based on not knowing something- and then using what we already know, discover the mystery of what we needed to learn and then using that new knowledge to discover something else.
religion (christiantiy) on the other hand cant explain any of these natural occuring events so simply makes up a story and a name for these events and convinced primitive man to believe in it.
TheoryClipsFTW 5 months ago
Is a human being is imaginary? Look at all cars, computers... all of them are working in accordance with law of nature like: F=M*A. I have not seen any scientific formulae like:
Car = Man did it
Therefore, a man is imaginary.
genliok 6 months ago
@genliok car = man did it = man is imaginary.
what retarded, idiotic, un-intulectuall, un-intelligent, fairytale book did you read to make you believe in this idiotic irrational equation?
TheoryClipsFTW 5 months ago
@LibertyLuvr1969
I have a glitch in my keyboard, I mean John
Daroxify 6 months ago
@LibertyLuvr1969
It does: It doesn't say it directly but it does insinuate it Daniel 4:11, Matthew 4:8, Isaiah 40:22, Job 38:44, Job 38:44, Job 38:13, 38:14 You have to be very thick to not see how they insinuate the earth is flat!
Sorry, but YOU are very much mistaken my brainwashed son
Daroxify 6 months ago
@LibertyLuvr1969
Omg, I am so sorry, i replied this comment to the wrong person! I am on your side! You are compleyely right
Daroxify 6 months ago
@LibertyLuvr1969
Science is trial and error, and secondly, it is the bible which suggests the Earth is flat, if you took your time to read it you would realise.
Daroxify 6 months ago
Another realy good video!
Mindslave1985 6 months ago
I love you channel. You make solid, rational arguments very skillfully.
Please make a video to point out how the illuminati is a deliusion.
It's possibly the worst delusion amongst some christians.
Himekahorselover 6 months ago
Comment removed
Furoar 6 months ago
I love your vids im a christian but i love them
conan6400 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Love the video work nice keep them coming! When you have time come
visit my channel!
wealthmanagement0 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Love the video work nice keep them coming! When you have time come
visit my channel!
simplechocolatediet 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Love the video work nice keep them coming! When you have time come
visit my channel!
StrikeTsunami 7 months ago
So ur sayin' that because man discovered certain things he will discover at some point the origin of the universe ? ...like cm-om the universe started from nothing and it evolved/changed/transforemd ....if not ..then explain this : if the universe began with the Big Bang or whatever...how did that planet get there -_- ... was it created by countless little rocks that melted together ? The awnswer might be yes ... if it is yes then how did those little rocks get there ? and it goes on and on
Gorosu 7 months ago
Constantly asking "Where did THAT come from" is like being a little kid at a shop, and when you ask your mother if you can have a candy bar, she says no. Then you constantly ask "Why?" to everything. IT GETS ANNOYING!
The "Something from nothing" argument has been debunked LOADS of times and it's sad how christians still use it.
All this debating on youtube isn't whether or not God exists. It's whether or not we can finally convince theists we are right. :)
anticorncob6 7 months ago
Ha bible humpers :p
vampirewolf88 7 months ago
I love this video- but people HAD flown before 1900.
Hot air balloons and airships man....
ResiusOnline 7 months ago
Whenever we say the origin of this is something else, it appears they can say "Where did THAT come from?" and then it turns out it's no good, and it looks like something from nothing is impossible. But I know a way around this.
Suppose there is nothing. We can always ask questions, like "How many objects are in existence?". The answer is ZERO. Now ask the question, and the answer is ONE since the one object is "zero" and then it becomes two (0 and 1) and so on to infinity. *cont.*
anticorncob6 7 months ago
*cont.* Now we know natural numbers exist. One dimension is known, which is t0. An infinite amount of t0 units lead to a t1 unit. In one t1 unit, a countably infinite amount of new numbers are created. This is a 2 dimensional graph where t0 units lead to t1 units. The original graph is t1 = t0 + 1. Then areas under curves and volumes form the t2 unit, or the third dimension (note that space is still finitely divisible so curves aren't real curves). *cont.*
anticorncob6 7 months ago
*cont.* Then an uncountably infinite amount of t2 units (or third dimension) account for all the units under the t3 dimension. The t0, t1, t2, and t3 units make up the 4 dimensions of spacetime. The reason one of those had to be time is so the speed of light is the same relative to everyone.
Now if you notice on the original t1 graph, the "points" at t0 and t1 values are actually two-dimensional which means entities are 2-D which is what M-theory states.
And THAT is how the universe came.
anticorncob6 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Harold Camping was RIGHT about May 21, click on my channel to see...
youneekk 7 months ago
FLAME WAR WHOOO!!! FUCK GOD!
effinlia 7 months ago 4
@effinlia >:D FUCK YEAH
RedBlueSucks 4 months ago in playlist More videos from GIIVideo
@effinlia Grow up...
LisaSpringfield 4 months ago
Comment removed
anticorncob6 8 months ago
Praise the Lord!!! Prophecy is being fulfilled by 'scoffer' videos across YouTube!!
You guys are lucky, you even get your own special mention(s) in the Bible! -
'First of all, you must understand that in the last days scoffers will come, scoffing and following their own evil desires.'
"Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools'
Whether you like it or not you're all fulfilling God's will!
RUKEAL 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Really enjoyed you video informative. When you have time come visit my channel!
simplechocolatediet 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Really enjoyed you video informative. When you have time come visit my channel!
hcgdiets0 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Really enjoyed you video informative. When you have time come visit my channel!
bestpreworkout 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Really enjoyed you video informative. When you have time come visit my channel!
FatReleaseSystem 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Really enjoyed you video informative. When you have time come visit my channel!
StrikeTsunami 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Really enjoyed you video informative. When you have time come visit my channel!
TheNitricOxide 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Really enjoyed you video informative. When you have time come visit my channel!
truehealthyproducts 8 months ago
@darthelghastN7
Agnosticism isn't the only logical answer, it is the pussiest answer ever. Because you are too scared to chose either side.
What you are saying is that we shouldn't say that God isn't real because it is possible for a magical being to exist outside of existence that can telepathically communicate to everyone in the world at once. Then you think it is logical that there is 2 places where everyone goes to when they die and live there for eternity. Plus stupider stuff.
soadpwnsyou 8 months ago
@soadpwnsyouAtheism cannot answer the question as to why existence itself exists. A fetus does not exist until after his or her parents have had relations. You appear to argue that a (metaphorical) fetus can just suddenly be (from nonexistence) without a cause, or else always existed, without explaining how either is possible. Until you can provide some logical answer, then atheism is untenable. You simply don't know.
litwriter100 8 months ago
@litwriter100
Holy fucking shit, what you just said disproves the entire religious side.
You said that a fetus cannot be their without parents. But Christianity believes that Mary had a baby from Magic.
Christianity says that humans were made out of clay/rib bone.
That is impossible.
Atheism DOESN'T ANSWER THE QUESTION TO LIFE AND IT DOESN'T DETERMINE THAT YOU BELIEVE IN EVOLUTION OR THE BIG BANG.
Atheism means that you know there is no god.
Learn the definition before you talk.
Fucking idiot
soadpwnsyou 8 months ago
@soadpwnsyouAh! Ah! I see you have been reading *Thirty Days to a Better Vocabulary.* Please get back to me when you finish the first week. Are you In actuality a confirmed believer posing as an atheist in an effort to discredit the philosophy? Interesting. Indeed, the sacrifices one must make in support of one’s cause.
litwriter100 8 months ago
@litwriter100
I guess you didn't read my comment or you thought it was so good that you got mad.
Only people that give up in arguments or realize that they lose talk about vocabulary and cursing.
Good job on realizing that God isn't real.
Fucking dumbass.
soadpwnsyou 8 months ago
@soadpwnsyou Atheism means LACK OF AN ACTIVE BELIEF IN DEITIES.
Learn the definition before you talk.
Fucking idiot
Furoar 6 months ago
@Furoar
Lack of an active belief, no. It is the rejecting of the belief in deities.
We know there is no god, but people like you believe that a deity exists because you want there to be.
Just like people know magic isn't real.
You don't say you just have a lack of belief in magic, you know there is no magic.
Atheists know there is no god and religious people are just fucking idiots that have no brain.
soadpwnsyou 6 months ago
@soadpwnsyou No, I know there is no magic {on Earth} and there isn't evidence of anything beyond the capacity of nature {in what we have explored}. You can't just skip details of location and span of investigation just to suit yourself in claims of knowledge, you are "knowing through faith" just as much as they are. It is like if I were to tell you I {know} penguins aren't real just because there aren't any in my basement.
Furoar 6 months ago
@Furoar
I am not knowing through faith... why would I have faith in not believe in something. Only religious people say they have faith in a god. There is no god, there is no evidence for god, there will never be evidence because he isn't real.
Your penguin analogy doesn't work at all you fucking retard. All of you people are exactly the same, provide no evidence for something you believe in and then call everyone else idiots.
Fucking wake up.
soadpwnsyou 6 months ago
@soadpwnsyou Okay belligerent little shit, you are {taking faith} that the qualities that have been observed to support you are consistent within the entire universe and potentially beyond.
The penguin analogy is proper, and your ad hominem doesn't prove otherwise.
Atheism - WITHOUT GOD
Antitheism- AGAINST GOD
You are antitheistic, so please stop associating your injustified closed minded hate-filled diarrhea with atheism.
Real atheists don't like it at all, & we're going to start saying so.
Furoar 6 months ago 9
@Furoar
How am I against something that I don't even believe you fucking moron.
All I am trying to show is that god isn't real.
I think everyone has the right to believe what they believe, even if it is stupid as hell.
You are not a "real" atheist. Why are you trying to act better than other atheists? You think it is cool to do so? you are a fucking joke.
Real atheists are the ones trying to show everyone that there is no god.... why are you defending the existence in god?
Fucking dumbass
soadpwnsyou 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@soadpwnsyou "All of you people are exactly the same, provide no evidence for something you believe in and then call everyone else idiots.
Fucking wake up."
Furoar 6 months ago
@Furoar
2nd post)
No your penguin analogy is wrong.
Saying that you know penguins don't exist because you haven't seen one is not the same as saying god is not real because there is no evidence at all (anywhere).
Penguins exist because you can go see one, they are at zoos, there is evidence that they exist.
God has not existence.
This is why your fucking analogy fails.
God isn't real because he isn't real. Until someone has proven that god is real. Atheists are 100% correct; fact.
soadpwnsyou 6 months ago
@soadpwnsyou I am facepalming so hard right now. Analogies aren't supposed to be literal. It was a depiction of a proposed circumstance in such a way you are doing.
I was suggesting that if I pulled out of my ass a "fact" of {absolute} non-existence of a certain thing, by only the assessment of a {limited} area, it wouldn't really be a {fact} at all.
You are not less agnostic than anyone else. You don't {know} there is no evidence at all {anywhere}, because we have not investigated {EVERYWHERE}
Furoar 6 months ago
@Furoar
I am not agnostic, I know god isn't real because it is an impossibility and there is nothing to support the existence of a god.
Your analogy fails
You were saying that since someone hasn't seen a penguin they don't believe in it. That is foolish because there is actual evidence of the penguin and they can go see one.
But you were trying to make that work with my disbelief in god. Though you can't test god at all because he isn't real. There is nothing you can do to prove a god right.
soadpwnsyou 6 months ago
@soadpwnsyou No, "fucking idiot," SPECIFIC CONCEPTS OF GOD are what can't exist by logic and nature. We could make an infinite amount of concepts of deities that can't be proven or disproven.
How do you propose we ever investigate whether there's anything beyond our universe, much less "know" that laws of nature would apply in such a place? Like a parallel dimension or some such?
If you think you're truly not agnostic, then you're {delusional}.
Furoar 6 months ago
@Furoar
Con
If we have not investigated the existence of a god then why do people say that people in the bible have seen him or talked to him
Also the existence of god is impossible it is saying that something created the universe and these gods exist outside of the universe.
Your logic of saying that you can't say for sure would work for INFINITE possibilities.
Someone saying that they have an invisible pink unicorn is the same as god.
And you are saying that we cant reject it for certain
soadpwnsyou 6 months ago
@soadpwnsyou {Invisible} and {Pink} are {Contradicting} qualities. Use your head. There can be plenty of ideas of god that don't contradict itself nor our existence.
Furoar 6 months ago
@Furoar
No no no... he is invisible but when you die you see that he is pink. (This is how every religion works, they make up excuses when they have contradictions) I put a contradiction in it to show you how religion says they are always right.
It is funny how you say you are delusional if you are not agnostic. Agnostic are just pussies that are just as stupid as religious people. You honestly think that there is a possibility of a creator that has infinite magic and wisdom.
soadpwnsyou 6 months ago
@soadpwnsyou I don't support apologetics.
I don't support you either, delusional narcissistic idiot who claims to know that there is no possibility of something you don't like the thought of.
Furoar 6 months ago
@Furoar
I like the thought of going to heaven and being in eternal bliss but I know it isn't real.
I wish god was real, but guess what he isn't real.
I wish magic was real, but guess what it isn't real.
Basically you don't support anyone that chooses a side and you pussy out and try to act like you are the smart one. You are on your own then. Stop being a fagot hipster pussy and just go with what you actually think. Or is your brain too damn slow to chose.
soadpwnsyou 6 months ago
Comment removed
Furoar 6 months ago
@soadpwnsyou This makes your delusion and BIGOTRY apparent. You ARROGANTLY FLAME people who refuse to "go with what they think" and instead "go with what they know" and what I know is that I DON'T KNOW, AND NEITHER DO YOU.
You know what else I know? You're the one that's the hipster tool here.
The fact that many concept originate from imagination, has absolutely no bearing on the knowledge of whether such a thing is real, in UNLIMITED CONTEXT. "Unknown" is not an embarassing thing in science.
Furoar 6 months ago
@Furoar
You are an idiot. You didn't provide anything except for saying "we don't know".
But what you believe is what you believe.
How am I a bigot against imaginary people... fucking retard.
You are an idiot. and provide nothing useful except for generic bullshit that only agnostics say to not have to chose a side.
soadpwnsyou 6 months ago
@soadpwnsyou And you're some kind of smear politician wannabe. To anyone with a rational head, it is clear you are the idiot, because you just keep repeating yourself with your childish insults no matter what, to keep {your beliefs} looking like they're valid.
What do I believe? This makes it so obvious you are not paying attention. You are the one with a belief. I {know} that the knowledge on this matter is not available. Not a belief.
You're a bigot because you hate instead of respect.
Furoar 6 months ago
@Furoar
You are repeating the same thing too, that is what an argument is. You can't provide infinite ideas into a youtube argument.
Respect is earned... and anyone on youtube has not earned it. I don't give respect unless someone is very respectful back. It goes both way.
You have a belief too of not believe in or believing in a god. Which also makes you a bigot for saying everyone is wrong except you. That is the epitome of bigotry.
But this argument is pointless lol.
soadpwnsyou 6 months ago
@soadpwnsyou Oh, I see it, you threw me around to confuse faith with belief.
Okay then, I'll say that I am very confident in my belief and believe that you ought to be too because this belief is the only one that is based on true knowledge. Please type define:knowledge in google so we avoid further misunderstanding.
I am not intolerant to anybody's particular comfort in {faith} in way of {hope} in whatever supernatural force or lack thereof- I'm just disapproving of ignorance of knowledge.
Furoar 6 months ago
@Furoar
I like how you call me names and then you go back on it and become a huge dumbass.
You say you use knowledge but the only thing you said was that you can't know for certain, that isn't knowledge at all. That is just saying well fuck it, it is impossible to prove or disprove.
That isn't knowledge that is just acting like you are awesome and telling everyone they are wrong because you are the master of knowledge.
Get the fuck off the internet.
soadpwnsyou 6 months ago
@soadpwnsyou I didn't say we {can't} know, I said we {don't} know, and that's the truth.
It IS knowledge to know that we DO NOT HAVE certain knowledge.
And you didn't even answer when I asked how do you propose we explore the potential outside our universe. Thats not necessarily implying such a thing is impossible, but its at least WAY beyond our ability for the time being.
You're being very hypocritical in acting you are awesome and telling me wrong.
You really have an anger problem. Get help.
Furoar 6 months ago
@soadpwnsyou Really, if anyone should get the fuck off the internet, it's you, preferably to seek help for your insanity. You refuse to learn anything, your idea of debate is using every fallacy in order to "win," give a bad name for atheists, purposefully piss off theists, influence those who are entertained by trolling, a quality conditioned by "the cesspool of the internet," to be bigoted and hateful and avoidant of rational thought. You will not succeed in making hell on earth, sociopath.
Furoar 6 months ago
@Furoar
I refuse to learn... except for that I look for knowledge more and more everyday. The more I learn, the more I do not believe in superstitious religious deities.
You call me a troll, except that you came on this video and found my comment and responded because you were angry.
Give a bad name for atheists? I just told atheists on facebook about you and everyone laughed at you.
You call me a sociopath and insane for saying you are wrong. You are truly delusional.
Kill yourself.
soadpwnsyou 6 months ago
@soadpwnsyou "Kill yourself."
No matter what you think you're saying, this tells all about your mental state. Nobody in their right mind demands that.
SEEK HELP.
Furoar 6 months ago
@Furoar
I put that in there to see if you only commented on the kill yourself part. which you did and provided no further argument about what we started
I did this to show how you are now not arguing your point because you know that you have nothing logical to say and will only point out anything that is wrong in the argument whether it be cursing, violence or anger
So you proved my point and you decided to cease your argument, but now that I point this out you will try to go back and act smart
soadpwnsyou 6 months ago
@soadpwnsyou Last bit of advice, if you and your "facebook group" really advocate seeking knowledge, you would be far less likely to turn the people who genuinely know more than you away from sharing by disgust of your "feigned arrogance." That really just doesn't make sense. I would hope also you've been sharing the revelations and epiphanies about your state of mind as well other than leaving it as an out of context part of our correspondence that you oh so smart people found entertaining.
Furoar 6 months ago
@Furoar
The facebook group is Atheism lol.
Stop commenting now it is pointless.
soadpwnsyou 6 months ago
@soadpwnsyou Yours are just as pointless.
Nyeeeeh
Furoar 6 months ago
@Furoar
I know that is what I meant :)
soadpwnsyou 6 months ago
@Furoar
(continued)
What is the point of you trying to show everyone that only agnosticism is the way to go and everyone else is wrong.
Explain to me how in our universe the idea of a deity is even possible.
Remember, a deity is something that created the universe. This means is has to exist outside of the universe before the universe was created. It would have had to exist before time, space and anything.
Why do you care so much about telling everyone to not voice their opinion?
soadpwnsyou 6 months ago
@soadpwnsyou Its not the opinion, it is your attitude and how you express your opinion as fact.
Last benefit of the doubt for you:
Why are you so convinced that something existing outside of our universe prior to the existence of our universe, whether it be something involved with the creation with our universe or not, is impossible?
Honest scientists and theorists will say nothing is certain, even if you have their backing on the concept of time is tied to our universe. Our scope is limited.
Furoar 6 months ago
@Furoar
But majority of stop scientists are atheists, this means that they reject the idea of a deity.
Again I never said that nothing helped in the process of what created the universe.
I am saying that an all powerful, all wise, supernatural, magic, infinite being cannot exist (this is a deity). It is outside of any scientific law that has been created.
Why are you so hell bent on proving that we cannot prove or disprove anything?
soadpwnsyou 6 months ago
@soadpwnsyou But they reject it because of the lack of evidence. This is not the same thing as being absolutely certain of the absence of any possibility of it. Look into solipsism and you see why absolute certainty can't be done at all even.
That's a specific idea of a deity. Deity just denotes divine being, and divinity equates to supernatural. We really cannot tell whether there are places where our laws of nature don't apply in.
Because ignorance is bad, I put an explanation w/o @you below.
Furoar 6 months ago
@Furoar
This is why I really don't like your logic. You said that absolute certainty can't be done at all.
I hope you are not like the last person that I talked to who said, hey would could all be computer programs. He was referring to the Matrix and saying that it could be our existence. Because we can't absolutely prove or disprove anything.
Your logic is based on that you have a small belief that anything at all is possible even words turning into fish. Your logic fails.
soadpwnsyou 6 months ago
@soadpwnsyou Think about how it is you know it is absolutely certain that words will never turn into fish. It would be because we never observed such a thing and have a long history of never observing such a thing. Expecting uniform consistency throughout the entirety of time is actually a fallacy. We can make {predictions} that it'll never happen and it is accepted because it is beyond reasonable doubt. But the doubt is never completely removed. It is {miniscule} but it is there nonetheless.
Furoar 6 months ago
@Furoar
I get what you are saying.
I will go on still being an atheist until there is some shred of evidence.
So far things are impossible to happen, but we haven't experienced the entirety of the universe or things like black holes. For all you know black holes could take us to another dimension with different outcomes of our own lives/physics.
I will never 100% disprove anything, but I still don't believe in it.
Your logic isn't actually bad it is just me saying things to see if you crack.
soadpwnsyou 6 months ago
@soadpwnsyou I can respect that, and I'm glad to hear you are not as you showed..Be mindful though that I can't really condone a trick like that outside of PMs, these comment forums are "public" and you have the capacity to play a bad influence to impressionable people (not necessarily just kids but anyone lacking mental maturity despite age) by your exhibited confidence, not knowing about smear, fallacy and stereotypes. I'm sure you wouldn't teach your own kids this way, so control yourself pls
Furoar 6 months ago
@Furoar
It is youtube so my idea of an argument is no rules lol.
In real life I am very nice to people and have long conversations
I did ask an atheist day at my school and talked to 2 people for about 2 hours
It is a way of taking on a new character that I don't get to do in real life, it is fun. Feeds my hunger for acting and provides great responses from people.
I am also doing a study (independent) on how people react when faced with aggression on the internet.
So far everyone is the same.
soadpwnsyou 6 months ago
@soadpwnsyou Everyone turns into some sort of Voltaire to parrot you to demonstrate the undesirability? Shouldn't that be showing you that you really are exacerbating aggressive attitudes over an otherwise fantastic communication medium?
Furoar 6 months ago
@Furoar
I mean sort of, though the use of curse words are just things I type fast. I don't really put much emotion into typing I just type
If I speak the way I would type it would sound hilarious
Spouting curse words but with a monotone voice in an apathetic way. We all have anger, the words we write on the internet can't show true emotion.
Someone could be actually angry punching things but sound non-angry on the internet or vice-versa.
That is why I don't care they way people act on here
soadpwnsyou 6 months ago