Its not scientific 2 talk bout 'man ' and a 'woman' as if they r mutually xclusive. In the animal kingdom creatures can change from male 2 female. In humans its all hormonal. Hermaphrodites 4 xample can share sexual organs from either sex. Can they marry? how does the law determine the sex of hermaphrodites?
Really impressive presentation, and so prescient--not a hundred-percent accurate in his prognostication; but, still. The points he raises are really valuable. I'm adding this to my favorites.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Of course, Mr Andrew Sullivan, the Neo-Conservative Racist Bigot lectures about CIVIL RIGHTS ! His hypocrisy is mind boggling. Andrew Sullivan talks about human rights, oh the irony !
Andrew , next time I see you walking down Commercial in P-Town I'm giving you the biggest hug! This talk, although 12 yrs old, is still relevant today and your eloquence is breathtaking !
Considering that there are federal level rights based on a marriage license, this is not true.
If they didn't they would have to refuse to recognize any marriage, and would you be willing to give up the freedom of your spouse to inherit your retirement when you passed on?
It's already recognized in every province of Canada. We let our women vote sooner, we never had slavery to the extent Americans had. What does it say about us? HOORAY!
Good, but what he needs to add to his segment on how this is a religious issue is that, even if the bible has definitive verses against homosexuality, there ARE other religions out there. And some of them have nothing against homosexuality. So under freedom of religion, they have a right to marry gays, regardless of what Christians believe. And they have the right to have these marriages recognized. Freedom of religion means allowing gay marriage, not banning it.
A civil services does NOT have anything to do with a religious marriage. I was married in Connecticut by a Justice Of The Peace. No Rev., no Rabbi, no Priest, noe any Imam was involved in any way. No one's marriage was harmed.
No one knows I am married except for the City Clerk Of Greenwich Ct and the Justice Of The Peace. The only thing that harms marriage is divorce.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Defining gay marriage restricts religious liberty (In Massachusetts Catholic charities can't adopt out as their doctrine is "discriminatory") and restricts parental rights (In Massachusetts, homosexual fairy tales were taught as equal treatment without parental authority). I want to protect my kids against what I, as a parent, feel is morally wrong. What about my rights? Why take over the definition of marriage? Domestic partnerships give gays ALL of the same rights. Marriage isn't a right.
That gay marriage somehow disenfranchises religious liberty is a completely bogus argument. It reminds me of people who complained that disallowing segregation in the south in the 60's "took away our southern way of life"
No one is asking YOU to marry someone of the same-sex. That would be infringing on your rights. But not allowing someone to marry the person they love, merely because you don't like that they are gay? Well, that is blatant discrimination.
"Domestic partnerships give gays ALL of the same rights. Marriage isn't a right." - not all, if one of the parnters dies the other doesnt have the same rights when it comes to the passing on of property...
Brilliant point, Elcristoph. I often find that, like most moral/political discourses, the gay marriage debate has been vitiated by a particularly vicious kind of conservative political salvationism. We must be clear on the distinction between marriage and domestic partnership. They are very far apart - both legally and morally.
He thinks the war casualties were his fault? I hope not, because misplaced guilt is tragic. He doesn't seem egotistical enough to think his prior stance had any more effect on the war than any other private citizen's.
Of course gay couples should be able to marry and have their marriages treated as any other marriage would be treated. Of course!
And oh my yes, he is handsome. I love his voice too.
Andrew looks very handsome here, but the HIV is tearing him apart, and i'm so happy the he's still life and "kicking", well done Andrew, and switch to democrat's side, you are a very liberal man with a very weird choice over politicians! Still, i respect you man, long life for Andrew!
palo, Andrew actually is doing great, his numbers are very good and actually he is a few pounds heavier than he is in this video. Where did you get this info that Andrtew was not doing well?
Yeah, I mean HIV, the drugs... or just age? This was 10 years ago, I sure don't look as youthful as I did then.
Plus he's got to bear the terrible guilt for having been a cheerleader for a horribly disastrous war. That's got to take its toll. And he's terribly, terribly allergic to cooties. :-)
This has been flagged as spam show
*°º·¤.¸.`*°º·¤.¸.¤·º°´¸.¤·º¤·°´
`*°º·¤.¸((( OBAMA 2012 )))¸.¤·º°´
¤·º°¸.¤·º°´.¤·º°`°º·¤.¸`°º·¤.¸
HE'S FIGHTING FOR US!!
He took out DADT & is fighting for Gay Marriage!
Let's keep the ONE that's fighting for OUR RIGHTS!
NuLaifMusic 1 month ago 2
SO AFTER GUY MARRIAGE, INCEST MARRIAGE IS NEXT?
kassop 2 months ago
@kassop
First of all THATS NEVER GOING TO HAPPEN BUT...
Why not, isn't that how we got started...
By the way Adam & Eve had 2 sons, now were they gay or did they F@CK their mom to reproduce?
NuLaifMusic 1 month ago
@NuLaifMusic It is happening and your too stupid see it, dont your remember the grandmother that got married to her grand son in the u.s last year?
kassop 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@kassop
Good thing that Adam and Eve’s two sons had a mom to f@ck or were they gay?
NuLaifMusic 1 month ago
Comment removed
drkdog 7 months ago
Its not scientific 2 talk bout 'man ' and a 'woman' as if they r mutually xclusive. In the animal kingdom creatures can change from male 2 female. In humans its all hormonal. Hermaphrodites 4 xample can share sexual organs from either sex. Can they marry? how does the law determine the sex of hermaphrodites?
westnblu 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Your total marriage solution partner leefoxnow.info
BnhghuNbhghy 11 months ago
Really impressive presentation, and so prescient--not a hundred-percent accurate in his prognostication; but, still. The points he raises are really valuable. I'm adding this to my favorites.
TheStrong32 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Think about your marriage and get a trusted women rockmycity.info
kchrstnsn 1 year ago
stop moaning.
SuperColin74 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Of course, Mr Andrew Sullivan, the Neo-Conservative Racist Bigot lectures about CIVIL RIGHTS ! His hypocrisy is mind boggling. Andrew Sullivan talks about human rights, oh the irony !
bluedorm 2 years ago
Andrew , next time I see you walking down Commercial in P-Town I'm giving you the biggest hug! This talk, although 12 yrs old, is still relevant today and your eloquence is breathtaking !
God Bless you sweetheart
Tiffanynicolina 2 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
For many times are tough right now. If you need to make some cash now here's how you can do it every time
GuaranteedWayToMakeMoney [dot] com
BrittPhillips 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Gays may be able to get married in their stste,but gay marriage will never be recognized by the federal government.
xj2yzz 2 years ago
xj2zz,
Considering that there are federal level rights based on a marriage license, this is not true.
If they didn't they would have to refuse to recognize any marriage, and would you be willing to give up the freedom of your spouse to inherit your retirement when you passed on?
belfrieboi 2 years ago
It's already recognized in every province of Canada. We let our women vote sooner, we never had slavery to the extent Americans had. What does it say about us? HOORAY!
treetri88 2 years ago
Good, but what he needs to add to his segment on how this is a religious issue is that, even if the bible has definitive verses against homosexuality, there ARE other religions out there. And some of them have nothing against homosexuality. So under freedom of religion, they have a right to marry gays, regardless of what Christians believe. And they have the right to have these marriages recognized. Freedom of religion means allowing gay marriage, not banning it.
fiveb85 2 years ago 10
whats with the smooth jazz?
johnnyluvsdorian 2 years ago 2
Gay people have not demanded to be married before this, because if they had, they would have been lynched in the streets.
People forget how extremely intolerant our culture has been in the past.
Biorhythm123 2 years ago 3
maybe we should go back to that.
xj2yzz 2 years ago
----Black peope were always allowed to marry (post Emancipation) .
IbnSheba 2 years ago
except for white people until 1967.
bearchewtoy75 2 years ago
Comment removed
belfrieboi 2 years ago
VERY WELL STATED AND THOUGHT OUT.
rextrek 2 years ago
A civil services does NOT have anything to do with a religious marriage. I was married in Connecticut by a Justice Of The Peace. No Rev., no Rabbi, no Priest, noe any Imam was involved in any way. No one's marriage was harmed.
No one knows I am married except for the City Clerk Of Greenwich Ct and the Justice Of The Peace. The only thing that harms marriage is divorce.
montyw47 2 years ago 5
very moving about the house
pcoldham 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
fuck andrew
Phoenixadj 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Defining gay marriage restricts religious liberty (In Massachusetts Catholic charities can't adopt out as their doctrine is "discriminatory") and restricts parental rights (In Massachusetts, homosexual fairy tales were taught as equal treatment without parental authority). I want to protect my kids against what I, as a parent, feel is morally wrong. What about my rights? Why take over the definition of marriage? Domestic partnerships give gays ALL of the same rights. Marriage isn't a right.
beezers99 3 years ago
That gay marriage somehow disenfranchises religious liberty is a completely bogus argument. It reminds me of people who complained that disallowing segregation in the south in the 60's "took away our southern way of life"
No one is asking YOU to marry someone of the same-sex. That would be infringing on your rights. But not allowing someone to marry the person they love, merely because you don't like that they are gay? Well, that is blatant discrimination.
tpetdoctor 3 years ago 5
"Domestic partnerships give gays ALL of the same rights. Marriage isn't a right." - not all, if one of the parnters dies the other doesnt have the same rights when it comes to the passing on of property...
Elcristoph 3 years ago
Brilliant point, Elcristoph. I often find that, like most moral/political discourses, the gay marriage debate has been vitiated by a particularly vicious kind of conservative political salvationism. We must be clear on the distinction between marriage and domestic partnership. They are very far apart - both legally and morally.
Bosoxrulenowandever 2 years ago
One day, hopefully your kids will protect you from yourself.
nicksum29 3 years ago 4
When was this taped? I couldn't recognize Mr. Sullivan at all! I thought he was the moderator or something!
KenshinSephiroth666 3 years ago
I know, right? He's really butched out.
kjenser 3 years ago
its cuz he shaved
VoiceOfModeration 3 years ago
He thinks the war casualties were his fault? I hope not, because misplaced guilt is tragic. He doesn't seem egotistical enough to think his prior stance had any more effect on the war than any other private citizen's.
Of course gay couples should be able to marry and have their marriages treated as any other marriage would be treated. Of course!
And oh my yes, he is handsome. I love his voice too.
affectivity 3 years ago 2
Andrew looks very handsome here, but the HIV is tearing him apart, and i'm so happy the he's still life and "kicking", well done Andrew, and switch to democrat's side, you are a very liberal man with a very weird choice over politicians! Still, i respect you man, long life for Andrew!
palou411 3 years ago 3
I think I saw him back Obama on Real Time.
eirefrance 3 years ago
palo, Andrew actually is doing great, his numbers are very good and actually he is a few pounds heavier than he is in this video. Where did you get this info that Andrtew was not doing well?
Clemburke1111 3 years ago
Yeah, I mean HIV, the drugs... or just age? This was 10 years ago, I sure don't look as youthful as I did then.
Plus he's got to bear the terrible guilt for having been a cheerleader for a horribly disastrous war. That's got to take its toll. And he's terribly, terribly allergic to cooties. :-)
prtlsy 3 years ago
prt, I saw him on TV recently on Meet The Press and he looked great.
Clemburke1111 3 years ago
pal, I see him on Meet The Press, etc, and he looks great.
Clemburke1111 3 years ago