@generalzeedot : Actually that very interviewer (Carl Cameron) went on to try to exclude and belittle Ron Paul during the presidential debates with smartass questions which had nothing to do with the debates. He also gave him less time than the other candidates to speak: but Paul turned the tables on him and made him look a right fool.
@coleyman1 A corporate owned-media correspondent "well respected" is counter-intuitive.
They are all, on record, owned by the largest corporations and banks on earth. If you think they care about the truth, you, or if you are well informed to make decisions that benefit anyone but themselves, you are only kidding yourself.
@Cartalucci We all are owned by someone or something but you can't make someone not be nice, kind or considerate. It is inherent in their makeup and personality. Cameron is relentless, as most reporters, when it comes to trying to get a story and get it on the air first. There is a difference, however, in the way you go about doing that. He has the personality and persona to come across as civil and nonintrusive in they way he asks and replys. I assure you compared to most he is a gentleman.
I may disagree with Dr. Paul from time to time. However, you can't deny his integrity and political courage. This is why he's not in the Senate and why he's not the President.
This cocksucking interviewers' wife was campaigning for W whilst he was interviewing W. That is an absolute lack of integrity of any news organization. Dan Rather was fired for less. Ron Paul will prevail above the power brokers because Ron Paul is the only person with integrity, let alone a backbone. RP 2012 !!!
The funny thing about Ron Paul is that if he had won the Republican nomination, he would have easily demolished Obama in debates over the economy. He could be our president now if the media hadn't tried to undermine him at every turn, and had given him an even platform to speak on.
he would've lost even worst. Whether he wrote them or not Ron Paul has alot of bigoted newsletters with his name on them. On top of that he has the vast support of conspiracy theory nutjobs and white supremacist groups. Granted Obama did have the black panthers and Louis Farrakhan endorsing him and Jeremiah Wright but Obama threw them all under the bus. They would've crucified him in the media worst than they did John McCain. Obama would've won in a landslide.
Hey America Norway here,. Wake Up America you are being manipulated by the media and schools It breaks my heart to see you falling in to a police state Remember the speech of JFK he warned you about a shadow goverment,.TURN YOUR TV`s OFF AND THINK! Say something ageinst the schools systems or poletics or your leaders YOU are a Terorist and you have no rights,.This IS NOT a REPUBLIC. REMEMBER the goverment is there to serve you NOT to rule you. WE in norway support your people NOT your media!
Will you just look at this devil fishing for a soundbite with that big juicy "fair shake" lure! He thought Ron would bite right down on it because obviously Fox was treating him like a rabid leper. Fortunately the good Dr. is too smart for that crap!
And this was the cocksucker who sneeringly asked Paul "Speaking of credibility, sir...,do you have any"? which got that lick-spittle WOP Giuliani giggling like a hyena.
This is the very fox that supported the Bush administration which tapped everyones line and apprehended whoever they wished and started the war and made a mockery of their nation. Fox sucks and the main reason is they don't report in a sense so people can be the judge instead they push their agenda and it is very obvious. Please people pay a close attention and you will notice it and if you go deeper with your research you will find out "it's all about corporates agenda". WAKE UP AMERICA
carl cameron. only widely known reporter to report Mossad involvement on 9/11 incident. fired? i dont think so. but hes now been reduced to interviewing politicians instead of actual reporting because of 9/11 report.
Here is the cold truth, every president we have had since the 1930's (possibly some even before) has been a puppet. Kennedy basically shed the light on who pulled the strings when he decided to shut down the Federal Reserve with an executive order and then.....murdered shortly after.........hmmmmmmm. Obama is the worst in this case because the man could get away with murder and people are blind about it. Now we need "another bailout"....so yea.
Archbishop Charles Chaput -- "We make a very serious mistake if we rely on media like the New York Times, Newsweek, CNN, or MSNBC for reliable news about religion. These news media simply don’t provide trustworthy information about religious faith — and sometimes they can’t provide it, either because of limited resources or because of their own editorial prejudices.”
If you can't believe these sources about religion, then doesn't that color everything they publish?
Thank you rhv201 for making my point clear, who says you need wealth, power to be president???the media??I think ive seen enough and im only 19 years old, thats just ignorant stating that only when we see the same old stuff will we change, bull shit, why not now, why not yesterday, and damn well its not going to change in the next coming years...unless we the people stand up, becuase they need us to give them power!!!
I see that conservative idiots already forgot about the Sarah Palin debacle. Pick a qualified VP candidate and you might not be whining about Obama right now.
Another angry liberal, but I will humor you. Where is your proof for anything? Perhaps Dan Rather has some documents you can borrow. Ignore the facts, vote for the coolest candidate, GOBAMA!
You claimed Obama is a Muslim w/o a birth certificate. I asked for proof. Instead of a rational response, you brought up Dan Rather. I'm done arguing with someone who makes wild claims and refuses to support them.
Wild claims? I don't recall any wild claims. You are the one without any proof. You are the one who supports a president that describes America as "one of the largest muslim nations". You are the one who supports a president that would, instead of pulling out his birth certificate and saying, "Here it is", would spend millions of dollars not to show it to anyone. You are the one that supports a president that attended a madrassa and glowingly describes his journeys through the Muslim world.
who cares if he is a Muslim Christian Buddhist or fucking Jew.. Obama is a liar & a fake. his cabinet is all wall street, his policies r fragile & bush like.i dont give a shit what religion or color a president is as long as he is a good man & i havent seen 1 of those since Kennedy. Obama is a puppet who will destroy ur country. Look at real issues instead of arguing about pointless crap. I mean what religion is truly correct anyway.. Can you tell me? I dont think u can with any real certainty
The point was that he was lying and being a Muslim Manchurian candidate. If it didn't matter, than why didn't he just tell everybody that he was, instead of pretending to be a Christian. Instead he chose to hide who he was, just as he did politically, trying to be viewed as a moderate, knowing that he is a flaming liberal that is hell bent on turning America into a socialist nation.
He lied to get votes.. Americans like most people love the big shows and the big circus acts.. they dont bother to study the history of a person.. not to mention the fact that the media chooses who is going to be in power through thier coverage.. people need to look deeper.. his religeous views are not the issue, people get suckered in and vote for liars the world over.. what is important is obama's substance and im afraid as time passes the world is finding that he has none. he is a puppet
the only thing that will ensure good men are in power is gernolists with guts and determination to get the real truth out, independent of fox cnn and the CFR's (commision on foriegn relations) control. People only know what they are taught or exposed to, unfortunately with politics its in hindsight we learn, not before hand. Look at history to see the future, obama is walking your country into war and a great depression. Study peter schiff he has a good hold on what the deal is ecconomically
you forgot to mention dictatorship. that's the ultimate goal of big government. collectivism or communism or whatever you wanna call it. People think communism could never happen in the U.S. i'd say they were pretty shocked in russia too. there is a very short interesting interview you should watch. type "griffin tyranny" into youtube and it comes up. Don't worry its about history and trends not FEMA camps :) you will like it. peace from ireland
hahaha I'am from Norway marsCubed and we #1 Dont have the wealthest population in the world after taxes #2 Equal population? Equal in what? I dont have the money to buy a 2009 model car, only millionare norwegians can afford that #3 We always score as one of the lowest in europe in education scores #4 Our Healthcare is market by 3 year long waiting lines and huge Insufficient hospitals/doctors/nurses #5 Ron Paul a nazi? you just showed your true self as a troll. #6 You loooose ;D
I'am not a liar, though I may be a fool, but so may also you ;) Yes according to the UN World Health Chart we are at the top when it comes to money SPENT on healthcare and education but when it comes to the quality and service we score as one of the lowest in Europe. Estonia for example has better math scores than us. It is common problem stated in the newspapers every week that our hospitals leaves patients in hallways due to lack of resources and that is despite all the money we use on it.
You are wrong again. #1 The ones responsible for the healthcare failure dont face the ballot box, we have a de facto one party state for 70 years, but this is slowly changing #2 The Rich in Norway can go to private luxurious hospitals, the poor wait in lines #3 the rest of your post is just rabble not worthy commenting.
@marsCubed Really you need to research your arguments. #1 The Healthcare system in Norway is extremely popular? Absolutely not the Norwegians, every single party in Norway is desperate to reform the healthcare system. #2 That the Brits vote for their NHS is irrelevant. #3 Your argument about bail outs and taxing banks has nothing to do with this debate. #4 The private healthcare system is used mostly for critical medical treatment, but granted it is also used for trivial things.
Capitalist economics is a religion, layers of techincal jargon which obscure one very simple fact. they rich get richer. while incomes of regular people are so low, both partners need to work and take out loans to survive.
If the creeps at the top will not invest in jobs, TAX then down to Earth.
The USA is hit worst of all by this, 40 million below the poverty line, millions without any health coverage at all.
It is not success when insurers make record bonuses while no healthcare is delivered.
It is estimated that if the USA had the same 'high' tax as in the EU, every single working and middle class American would have been $11,000 better off during the Bush years, Just think how many new jobs that could have created and how it would have helped with education and health.
Our economies were robbed by corps which bought politicians so they could reap in profit.
@plainlake Thanks, Consider Denmark. Decades of high tax on the top 5% (highest in the world) have made Denmark the wealthiest and most equal population on Earth. They did not crash. Very high levels of education, next to no crime, most democratic, inclusive. If you are a boss you are almost the same as workers and can go for a drink after work in fun & safety. We should all be heading that way. Republican spin makes the world seem like war. only the Nasty win.. in those terms watch rrkrvAUbU9Y
I noticed you liken "muslim" to "liberal" to "socialist", as if they were all the same thing. You lump Obama in with every single group that Christian Fundamentalists scorn, and I wonder if you're not a fundamentalist yourself. Not that it matters. He got elected, get over it.
I notice you liken "logic" to "garbled nonsense". Perhaps you could give examples of when someone "(liken "muslim" to "liberal" to "socialist")". Do you even know that you are typing or do you get on a free-internet computer in a pot-smoke filled dorm room and your hands just start going to town on the keyboard? Not that it matters, you have not had one coherent thought typed on here yet. You helped to elect a communist president, get over it.
You know what I don't understand about republicans when it comes to Obama and his faith? You try to rag on him for being a "muslim" (even though there would be nothing wrong if he were) but then turn around and give him grief for attending Trinity United Church of Christ for 20 years.
ALL republicans?or some?you're making yourself sound just as bad as them.Nothing wrong with going to church. Freedom of Religion. A lot of people had a problem with the message of Liberation Theology. It justifies coercion of others to redistribute wealth all in the name of GOD.If you look at the record of history,leaders that talked like that usually ended up murdering people all in the name of social and economic justice.The LEFT is all about CONTROL and FORCE.Especially when it come to money.
I didn't say anything about all republicans. I said the republicans that rag on him for being a supposed muslim. Then turn around and rag on him for going to a christian church. It doesn't make sense.
heh..."good man" and politician are two words that are very rarely used in the same sentence about the same person...if ever.
I think in order to be a good politician, you cannot be a good person at the core. You must compromise. You must play the game. You must be two faced.
It's our own fault. We used to be able to accept presidents with fake teeth, and wheelchairs, and speech impediments. Now we need the Obama girl.
Besides, someone of your caliber does not deserve rational responses. You stand behind a president who has assumed office without providing the documents necessary for one to play little league baseball. Without knowing any of his position you supported a candidate who's policy was "change" and totally disregarded what "change" could possibly mean. Despite the warnings that he often spoke of hindering the free market, controlling industries and "spreading wealth" you would contend that he...
... you would contend that he is not a socialist and is just trying to fix Bush's mess. Such a position, behind such a man requires blissful ignorance of the facts at hand, total irrationality in argument in defense of position, blind allegiance to a man whom you have no idea where his allegiance lies and furthermore, it requires you to have the same thing as those people that I am sure you despise, called "christians"... FAITH. You have faith in a man, and men always fail. So too, have you.
I couldn't care less about Obama. It sounds like you have a hard-on for the guy. All I said is that you have no proof that he lacks a birth certificate and is a muslim. Your responses still didn't address those claims, and I doubt that any further response from you will either. You can believe whatever you want, but if you're going to make accusations and tout conspiracy theories, you should at least have some proof. Otherwise, no one will take you seriously, and I doubt that anyone does.
I doubt anybody will take your non-comments about non-issues seriously, as you take non-stances in order to try to seem open minded. Your ignorance of where the burden of proof lies shows how foolish you are in your commenting. It is funny that you mention "conspiracy theories" as if such a thing proves kookiness. I am sure that all coups, all revolutions, all assassination, all wars have taken place without preponderance, forethought or planning which would be the hallmark of a conspiracy.
You have outlived your usefulness even for commenting on youtube videos. Perhaps Obama may have a position for a useful idiot as yourself so that you may infect others with your logical malfeasance.
HAHAHAHA. There are a few things you wackjobs always forget, every recount in 2000 had Bush winning, there was no evidence of Ohio voter fraud (except in your fantasy land blogspots) and the fact that Sarah Palin is at least twice as smart as Joe Biden, that fricken dumb peice of crap that was born with his foot in his mouth and always has some mythical story about mingling with "regular people" ... oh yeah and OBAMA is a COMMUNIST!
bloodtar: you underestimate how gullible the public is and how when you run on a generic message of "hope" and "change" that people insert all their own hopes and ideas onto that platform... even though O had no intention of actually doing any of that. claiming voter fraud as the reason completely misunderstands what the problem we face in our nation with people who don't recognize propaganda when they hear it.
True but, Obama had the power, wealth, and backing of the Democratic party. Obama also had the media hatred for Bush and the conservatives. Only when the people get tired of the same old stuff from the government will someone like Ron Paul get elected. Too many people in this country are out for themselves.
It's already been proven by internal memos , EVERYBODY is on a short leash at Fox , admitted by over a dozen former producers and reporters , that they have instructions on how to FRAME stories , what not to report , what to report , so lets drop the BS , Shepard Smith can talk like a reporter true , but his angle , his framing his controlled as well .
Fox is about supporting U.S. foreign policy , cheer leading invasions , supporting Israel ..blah blah ..its proven every day
Why is it always fox. All the others are on 'short leashes too" GE controls NBC and stands to make a lot of money off of Obama's green policies so they slant the news in hie favor that should bother everyone.
Don't we all! Shep Smith is a good reporter. (I know that wasn't him) Fox news isn't all about b.s. and entertainment. But they have bills to pay and those of us that follow real news shouldn't be offended or feel threatened anyway.
The strange thing is this guy is the same guy that humiliated paul during the debates by asking "do you have any, sir?" regarding the question of electability..
Right, and in this clip he is baiting Paul in front of recording cameras hoping to God that he can provoke something, anything that might discredit him. What is this buzzard's name anyway?
The real reason why ron Paul was excluded from the NH debates is NH has a lot of libertarian independents that would've voted for Ron Paul. A big showing would've given Ron Paul a lot of momentum and Foxnews, which was instrumental in getting him shut out, didn't want that to happen.
"States rights" isn't exactly a right in the way you're claiming Paul wants it to be, and he never said that. The concept of States Rights is based on the idea that power should never become too centralized; that a local government often knows how to govern better than a bureaucracy 2,000 miles away (Notwithstanding any state which denies personhood to anyone, for any reason; this is unacceptable).
That said, HR 300 doesn't appear to "annihilate checks and balances" at all.
A libertarian is one who holds the Inherent and Unalienable Rights of Personhood as the ultimate force in politics and government.
A neo-confederate (so-named to distinguish them from the original Confederate States of America which included slavery) is one who holds that "States' Rights" is the ultimate power.
Now, what do we hear Ron Paul actually saying?
"We don't dictate to the states" (true enough on the face of it).
He has stated that the Bill of Rights does not apply to the States, that the Fourteenth Amendment was ratified under duress by the former Confederate States and so is invalid (which is how he can oppose Birthright Citizenship, which is explicitly stated in the Fourteenth).
He has said that States should even be able to establish official State religions! This would of course be VERY oppressive to the rights of the people of other religions in such States.
Gee, you'd think that the Champion of the Constitution would KNOW that the U.S. Constitution has ZERO references to God, other than a formal date in the accepted style of the time (spelling out the literal meaning of "Anno Domini" [what "A.D." in dates stands for]: "In the Year of Our Lord").
However, the Constitution of the CONFEDERATE States of America DOES explicitly invoke "Almighty God"!
Is THAT the Constitution he's the "Champion" of!?
By the way, I put "States' Rights" in "scare quotes" every time I mention it for a REASON.
You see, there IS NOT NOW, nor was there EVER (even before the Civil War), nor was there ever INTENDED TO BE, ANY SUCH *THING* as "States' Rights"!
The clear and plain language of the Declaration of Independence AND the Bill of Rights BOTH make plain that ONLY PERSONS have, or CAN have, RIGHTS! NO Government at ANY level, or any OTHER non-Person entity, can have Rights of ANY kind!
Read my responses to hpso12xu from six days ago. I explained it in some more detail.
I should also point out that he didn't just VOTE for, but actually AUTHORED and multiple times CO-SPONSORED, the horrendously mis-named "We the People Act" (most recently as H.R. 300).
This was a direct attack on the Constitutional Separation of Powers and system of Checks and Balances that help protect individual Liberties and Rights.
No Libertarian would do such a thing. That's Neo-Confederate stuff.
Like they always say, only ask the questions that will give you the right response. This guy prolly thought he was a news reporter. He works for Fixed News for heavens sake. Ron Paul was polite but he could have been more honest about his answer.
Rodman 332 makes an awesome point. Consider an alternate reality where Fox gave Ron Paul some viability and took him seriously. What if he was given more respect at the debate, like he deserves. Could Ron Paul have picked up the Republicans and those independent moderates also? How many Dems would have jumped ship on Obama? We'll never know, but it's still a great question that rodman brings to mind.
95% of Blacks and 67% of Latinos went on Obama, whereas whites kept their historical 43% dem 57% rep track. So the question is: would so many (minority) reps still have jumped ship to Obama if he was running aganst Ron Paul? Well, I doubt. Only another Black person will ever be able to beat Obama now, unless whites start voting racist like blacks and latinos.
sadly I think your right when I said that I would vote for ron paul I was called everything but a sell out. it is kind sad my people don't care what type of black president it is so long as it is a black president and I guarantee no matter what he does the media won't call him on it just so they won't be called racist
I just hope that Obama is one of the best Presidents we've had in recent memory.
The first-ever Black (or first-ever female, for that matter) President HAS to be. If a white male President messes up, we say, "Gee, that guy was a lousy President."
But you know — you just KNOW — that if Obama messes up, all too many people will be saying, "See what happens if you let a Black person* be President?"
The sad thing is, he becomes president just when everything is up shit's creek. I would have like to see him become president when Bill left, or when the first Bush Left.
But you know this will all be put on Obama's foot as if he is the root of this mess we have in front of us, which is unfair, but he wanted the the duties....& he definitely got what he wished for.
But this much is guaranteed, there is no in between. Either he will be the greatest of all time, or one of the worst, either 1
Fortunately, the excrement hit the rotating bladed air propulsion device BEFORE the ELECTION, let alone the Inauguration. Only the willfully short-memoried can blame this mess on Obama.
Did you notice that the GOP acted like they didn't really WANT to win, UNTIL the bottom fell out? They nominated one of their LEAST charismatic candidates, then saddled him with the worst imaginable running mate. He didn't campaign aggressively, UNTIL the bottom fell out.
I suspect that the GOP knew what was coming, but hoped to hold the economy together with spit and bailing wire until after January 20, so that it would look like Obama's fault and thus not only cripple his re-election but also the chances of any future Black Presidents for at least a generation. Thus, they were basically taking a dive.
Unfortunately for them, they couldn't even hold it together until November 2, let alone January 20. The damage Bush did was simply too severe to be held back.
Obama was hand picked like every other US P. except kenedy and lincon and guess what they were both murdered. They chose obama to play the nice guy act after a rain of bush terror so the people would easily accept him. Obama is continuing bush's terroist acts just in a not so transparent manner. Obama said he would take troops outa Iraq and he did but he just moved them to Afagan. see the deception he did what he said, he dint say anything abt bringing them home, just outa iraq
Damn the media REALLY fucked Ron Paul. They try to show him as crazy and "un-electable". If the media was for Ron Paul, he would win the election by a CLEAR MILE. This shows that the president is now chosen by the media, they lie and feed this bs and most people (ignorant) believe it.
"Don't we all" I'll never forget those words, because behind all this BS in government lies the phrase "Don't we all" want to see an end to this corruption.
Damn that would be nice! Hehehe. I don't see the republican party collapsing though. It'll probably just reform to keep its "competativeness" against the democrats. It seems politics doesn't matter as long as you're in charge when it comes to the democrats and republicans. The libertarian party are the pretty much the only one who have said the same things all the time :P
America IS the Constitution. Ron Paul is America! The more I listen to him the more I realize how far the Republican party, and to a larger degree America's following of the Constitution, has gone off course. It can hardly be called America. Because America is the Constitution and Bill of Rights. If you haven't read it or read it lately, check out the Bill of Rights, which protects the people from their own government. And weep. Founding Fathers knew the biggest threat wasn't an external enemy.
It was a valid question. I agree that he has electability, but it was widely questioned by the current basis of the Republican party so it should've been asked and he answered very well.
NO, do not write Ron Paul in. He isn't registered in any states. No one will no you wrote in his name. He endorsed 4 other 3rd party candidates and wants all his supporters to vote for one of them. ([McObamain]) never have to listen to us until we prove to them that we won't listen to them. They never will listen to us either until we prove this. In order for our voice to be heard, we must vote 3rd party.-where it will count.
That reporter had a funny stare.
JDrosa1982 5 months ago
Well I could say I wish CNN, MSNBC, ABC, CBS, NY Post ect. were also always fair & balanced. Too bad it's the media ran by Humans.
j03y2fly 11 months ago
Doesn't the guy who said 'Dont we all' now work as a weatherman in Carson City NV? Probably not, but that would be hilarious if he did.
Gunman610 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
sign this petition at ronpaul2012 . net for ron paul to run for president in 2012.
bossrube53 11 months ago
sign this petition at ronpaul2012 . net for ron paul to run for president in 2012.
bossrube53 11 months ago
sign this petition at ronpaul2012 . net for ron paul to run for president in 2012.
bossrube53 11 months ago
that interviewer probably lost his job the next morning
generalzeedot 1 year ago
@generalzeedot : Actually that very interviewer (Carl Cameron) went on to try to exclude and belittle Ron Paul during the presidential debates with smartass questions which had nothing to do with the debates. He also gave him less time than the other candidates to speak: but Paul turned the tables on him and made him look a right fool.
MaxTallon 1 year ago
@generalzeedot Nope, he's still there and well respected. He is the political correspondant in Washington most of the time.
coleyman1 1 year ago
@coleyman1 A corporate owned-media correspondent "well respected" is counter-intuitive.
They are all, on record, owned by the largest corporations and banks on earth. If you think they care about the truth, you, or if you are well informed to make decisions that benefit anyone but themselves, you are only kidding yourself.
Cartalucci 1 year ago
@Cartalucci We all are owned by someone or something but you can't make someone not be nice, kind or considerate. It is inherent in their makeup and personality. Cameron is relentless, as most reporters, when it comes to trying to get a story and get it on the air first. There is a difference, however, in the way you go about doing that. He has the personality and persona to come across as civil and nonintrusive in they way he asks and replys. I assure you compared to most he is a gentleman.
coleyman1 1 year ago
I may disagree with Dr. Paul from time to time. However, you can't deny his integrity and political courage. This is why he's not in the Senate and why he's not the President.
FredC1968 1 year ago
@FredC1968 : True : It is a pity he's not a Senator but his son, Rand Paul, recently became a Senator.
MaxTallon 1 year ago
Fox simpley sucks!
MadjidKhan 1 year ago
Fox simplet sucks!
MadjidKhan 1 year ago
This cocksucking interviewers' wife was campaigning for W whilst he was interviewing W. That is an absolute lack of integrity of any news organization. Dan Rather was fired for less. Ron Paul will prevail above the power brokers because Ron Paul is the only person with integrity, let alone a backbone. RP 2012 !!!
manmanguy 1 year ago
Quit asking why this great man is not the president.
He doesn't lie. That's why.
maluko2 1 year ago 4
lol
910364 1 year ago
The funny thing about Ron Paul is that if he had won the Republican nomination, he would have easily demolished Obama in debates over the economy. He could be our president now if the media hadn't tried to undermine him at every turn, and had given him an even platform to speak on.
Necr0forte 1 year ago 5
@Necr0forte
he would've lost even worst. Whether he wrote them or not Ron Paul has alot of bigoted newsletters with his name on them. On top of that he has the vast support of conspiracy theory nutjobs and white supremacist groups. Granted Obama did have the black panthers and Louis Farrakhan endorsing him and Jeremiah Wright but Obama threw them all under the bus. They would've crucified him in the media worst than they did John McCain. Obama would've won in a landslide.
sakonhagakure 1 year ago
ron paul is a beautiful man.
c1rca101 1 year ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
RON PAUL 2012!
joeylodes 1 year ago
I wish we had a canadian version of Ron Paul, all we have is Stephen-Fuckass-Harper.
triptolawl 1 year ago 3
'Don't we all!'...friggin hilarious!
Gunman610 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hey America Norway here,. Wake Up America you are being manipulated by the media and schools It breaks my heart to see you falling in to a police state Remember the speech of JFK he warned you about a shadow goverment,.TURN YOUR TV`s OFF AND THINK! Say something ageinst the schools systems or poletics or your leaders YOU are a Terorist and you have no rights,.This IS NOT a REPUBLIC. REMEMBER the goverment is there to serve you NOT to rule you. WE in norway support your people NOT your media!
Dukenable 1 year ago 2
Will you just look at this devil fishing for a soundbite with that big juicy "fair shake" lure! He thought Ron would bite right down on it because obviously Fox was treating him like a rabid leper. Fortunately the good Dr. is too smart for that crap!
cacapoopoo2327 1 year ago
Start Saving that Money Bomb cash now... and sign up here
run ron paul DOT com
FRVIP 1 year ago
US Capitalist construct is deliberately designed for conflict between worker & employer, not collaboration.
Managerial wages should be no more than 3x worker salaries. CEO salary not more than 6x.
One union member & one supervisor must be on Board of Directors- thus facilitating dialogue & mediation between management & worker.
Workers should all have a %share in company and a voice in its operation.
This essentially is the German system. Highly productive, flexible, minimal conflict.
SignoroIncognito 1 year ago
God, what a creepy interviewer...
d0861 1 year ago
@d0861 i kno lol he shoots questions out
ieatdeadbabies101 1 year ago
Go Ron Paul
spooninspoon 1 year ago 5
And this was the cocksucker who sneeringly asked Paul "Speaking of credibility, sir...,do you have any"? which got that lick-spittle WOP Giuliani giggling like a hyena.
19Truth53 1 year ago
yes alistair you are right. he did ask ron paul that question....during a national televised debate no less!!!
good eye. good memory.
zmc33 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The Luap Norista are in the pay of big oil money,
the tools of conquering islam.
HANG THEM HIGH!!!
Treasonous filthy hippie creeps, all of them!!!
hotspur666 2 years ago
Isn't this the guy in the debate who asked paul if he had "any electability!?" that wasnt very fair...
alistairproductions 2 years ago
haha! That guy voted for Ron Paul
stanmarsh071980 2 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
This is the very fox that supported the Bush administration which tapped everyones line and apprehended whoever they wished and started the war and made a mockery of their nation. Fox sucks and the main reason is they don't report in a sense so people can be the judge instead they push their agenda and it is very obvious. Please people pay a close attention and you will notice it and if you go deeper with your research you will find out "it's all about corporates agenda". WAKE UP AMERICA
NedaAlive 2 years ago
bet that reporter got fired haha..
primerabbit 2 years ago 3
carl cameron. only widely known reporter to report Mossad involvement on 9/11 incident. fired? i dont think so. but hes now been reduced to interviewing politicians instead of actual reporting because of 9/11 report.
IFIRIEIEID 2 years ago
Fox news isnt very fair and balanced.
MrJohnnyrace 2 years ago 9
Here is the cold truth, every president we have had since the 1930's (possibly some even before) has been a puppet. Kennedy basically shed the light on who pulled the strings when he decided to shut down the Federal Reserve with an executive order and then.....murdered shortly after.........hmmmmmmm. Obama is the worst in this case because the man could get away with murder and people are blind about it. Now we need "another bailout"....so yea.
Drunkz101 2 years ago 44
@Drunkz101 let's hope the internet will give him a chance
serolog2 1 year ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
Archbishop Charles Chaput -- "We make a very serious mistake if we rely on media like the New York Times, Newsweek, CNN, or MSNBC for reliable news about religion. These news media simply don’t provide trustworthy information about religious faith — and sometimes they can’t provide it, either because of limited resources or because of their own editorial prejudices.”
If you can't believe these sources about religion, then doesn't that color everything they publish?
vechorik 5 months ago
Thank you rhv201 for making my point clear, who says you need wealth, power to be president???the media??I think ive seen enough and im only 19 years old, thats just ignorant stating that only when we see the same old stuff will we change, bull shit, why not now, why not yesterday, and damn well its not going to change in the next coming years...unless we the people stand up, becuase they need us to give them power!!!
southernCal909 2 years ago
Two reasons why Obama is president...
1. Voter fraud.
2. Those that voted for him throught we needed an afirmative action president.
BloodTar 2 years ago
And the republicans had some pretty bad candidates...
Gargruk 2 years ago 3
I see that conservative idiots already forgot about the Sarah Palin debacle. Pick a qualified VP candidate and you might not be whining about Obama right now.
deathbotv1 2 years ago
How about,
1. Pick a VP candidate that doesn't lie about being in diners that have been closed down for years.
2. Pick a Prez candidate that actually has a birth certificate and doesn't lie about being a Muslim/agnostic.
micahxmp 2 years ago
Another angry GOP cheerleader, but I'll humor you. Where is your proof that Obama is a muslim?
deathbotv1 2 years ago
Another angry liberal, but I will humor you. Where is your proof for anything? Perhaps Dan Rather has some documents you can borrow. Ignore the facts, vote for the coolest candidate, GOBAMA!
micahxmp 2 years ago
What the hell are you talking about?
deathbotv1 2 years ago
What the hell are you talking about? YOU ARE PROBABLY DRUNK!!! Stop responding to video while you are hammered!
micahxmp 2 years ago
You claimed Obama is a Muslim w/o a birth certificate. I asked for proof. Instead of a rational response, you brought up Dan Rather. I'm done arguing with someone who makes wild claims and refuses to support them.
deathbotv1 2 years ago
Wild claims? I don't recall any wild claims. You are the one without any proof. You are the one who supports a president that describes America as "one of the largest muslim nations". You are the one who supports a president that would, instead of pulling out his birth certificate and saying, "Here it is", would spend millions of dollars not to show it to anyone. You are the one that supports a president that attended a madrassa and glowingly describes his journeys through the Muslim world.
micahxmp 2 years ago
who cares if he is a Muslim Christian Buddhist or fucking Jew.. Obama is a liar & a fake. his cabinet is all wall street, his policies r fragile & bush like.i dont give a shit what religion or color a president is as long as he is a good man & i havent seen 1 of those since Kennedy. Obama is a puppet who will destroy ur country. Look at real issues instead of arguing about pointless crap. I mean what religion is truly correct anyway.. Can you tell me? I dont think u can with any real certainty
IstilGotGame 2 years ago
The point was that he was lying and being a Muslim Manchurian candidate. If it didn't matter, than why didn't he just tell everybody that he was, instead of pretending to be a Christian. Instead he chose to hide who he was, just as he did politically, trying to be viewed as a moderate, knowing that he is a flaming liberal that is hell bent on turning America into a socialist nation.
micahxmp 2 years ago
He lied to get votes.. Americans like most people love the big shows and the big circus acts.. they dont bother to study the history of a person.. not to mention the fact that the media chooses who is going to be in power through thier coverage.. people need to look deeper.. his religeous views are not the issue, people get suckered in and vote for liars the world over.. what is important is obama's substance and im afraid as time passes the world is finding that he has none. he is a puppet
IstilGotGame 2 years ago 3
the only thing that will ensure good men are in power is gernolists with guts and determination to get the real truth out, independent of fox cnn and the CFR's (commision on foriegn relations) control. People only know what they are taught or exposed to, unfortunately with politics its in hindsight we learn, not before hand. Look at history to see the future, obama is walking your country into war and a great depression. Study peter schiff he has a good hold on what the deal is ecconomically
IstilGotGame 2 years ago
you forgot to mention dictatorship. that's the ultimate goal of big government. collectivism or communism or whatever you wanna call it. People think communism could never happen in the U.S. i'd say they were pretty shocked in russia too. there is a very short interesting interview you should watch. type "griffin tyranny" into youtube and it comes up. Don't worry its about history and trends not FEMA camps :) you will like it. peace from ireland
irishronpaul 2 years ago 4
@irishronpaul Consider that Norway and Sweden have the highest taxes in the world.
As a result they have the wealthiest and most equal populations in the world.
The best educated, next to no crime, excellent free health care.
They are also considered the most liberal, democratic and free by most standards.
Not perfect, but it makes your argument dumd and shows RP for being the corp stooge that he is.
inequality?
anti democracy?
pro oil corps and Bush at Copenhagen
It is Ron Paul who is a nazi
marsCubed 2 years ago
hahaha I'am from Norway marsCubed and we #1 Dont have the wealthest population in the world after taxes #2 Equal population? Equal in what? I dont have the money to buy a 2009 model car, only millionare norwegians can afford that #3 We always score as one of the lowest in europe in education scores #4 Our Healthcare is market by 3 year long waiting lines and huge Insufficient hospitals/doctors/nurses #5 Ron Paul a nazi? you just showed your true self as a troll. #6 You loooose ;D
killerbee2k 2 years ago
You are either a liar or a fool killerbee2k
Anyone who is interested may like to have a look at the 2009 World health chart from globalhealth o rg
it is animated and compares many datasets over decades.
Ask yourself why RP is considered authoritarian scum by other libertarians.
here is a clue; v=t4P87p-Arcw
He pushes for murder charges for possession of morning after pill,
doctor's 'rights' not to treat the poor,
inequality & anti democracy.
His staff are creeps, look them up also, he is a con.
marsCubed 2 years ago
I'am not a liar, though I may be a fool, but so may also you ;) Yes according to the UN World Health Chart we are at the top when it comes to money SPENT on healthcare and education but when it comes to the quality and service we score as one of the lowest in Europe. Estonia for example has better math scores than us. It is common problem stated in the newspapers every week that our hospitals leaves patients in hallways due to lack of resources and that is despite all the money we use on it.
killerbee2k 2 years ago
It's not perfect, but it provides excellent care for the vast majority, failures are exposed, those responsible face the ballot box.
It is also much cheaper than corps syphoning off $, only serving the rich with profitable perks.
Regan, Thatcher, Clinton broke it.
They removed the firewalls between the public and financial sectors.
deregulated & let the market loose on tax money.
Inequality increased hugely.
Tax the richest 1% back to Earth orbit.
invest in education etc
trickle down was a myth.
marsCubed 2 years ago
You are wrong again. #1 The ones responsible for the healthcare failure dont face the ballot box, we have a de facto one party state for 70 years, but this is slowly changing #2 The Rich in Norway can go to private luxurious hospitals, the poor wait in lines #3 the rest of your post is just rabble not worthy commenting.
killerbee2k 2 years ago
I am not wrong, you are bloody lying,
The health care systems in UK amd Norway are extremely popular, In the UK the NHS is regularly voted the thing we are most proud of as a nation.
The conservatives and the right are responsible for the bail outs, the Left would Tax the banks back to planet Earth.
Yes there it private health too for those who want it, this is often used for trivial things such as nose jobs.
The poor wait in lined because of conservative cuts.
one party state? LOL. that is USA.
marsCubed 2 years ago
And yes I do know that Labour have been in power in the UK for a while, for consetvative read moron and it all makes sense.
Let's face it, everybody was happy enough with the crap while we kept getting promises of it getting better.
BUT TRICKLE DOWN WAS A MYTH.
It fucked up all the economies who went along with the magic marked trash..
marsCubed 2 years ago
@marsCubed Really you need to research your arguments. #1 The Healthcare system in Norway is extremely popular? Absolutely not the Norwegians, every single party in Norway is desperate to reform the healthcare system. #2 That the Brits vote for their NHS is irrelevant. #3 Your argument about bail outs and taxing banks has nothing to do with this debate. #4 The private healthcare system is used mostly for critical medical treatment, but granted it is also used for trivial things.
killerbee2k 2 years ago
Nothing to do with the debate?
How ridiculous, you are obviously on another planet, vast sums of money have gone to prop up a failed market which has only benefited the few.
Since the 70s we have been told that speculative finance would bring benefits, The capitalist class would use charity or some such trash.
It was a scam which robbed regular people and trashed our economies.
Ron Paul's chief backer is a coin merchant. another rip off.
Norway is better off than many, you have oil and invested.
marsCubed 2 years ago
Capitalist economics is a religion, layers of techincal jargon which obscure one very simple fact. they rich get richer. while incomes of regular people are so low, both partners need to work and take out loans to survive.
If the creeps at the top will not invest in jobs, TAX then down to Earth.
The USA is hit worst of all by this, 40 million below the poverty line, millions without any health coverage at all.
It is not success when insurers make record bonuses while no healthcare is delivered.
marsCubed 2 years ago
It is estimated that if the USA had the same 'high' tax as in the EU, every single working and middle class American would have been $11,000 better off during the Bush years, Just think how many new jobs that could have created and how it would have helped with education and health.
Our economies were robbed by corps which bought politicians so they could reap in profit.
This was Regan, Thatcher and Friedman's deal.
It was a con.
more of the same is stupid.
RP is a fucking moron.
marsCubed 2 years ago
I dont want to argue about this again, But marsCubed Has some really good points.
plainlake 1 year ago
marsCubed 1 year ago 2
@marsCubed here's the problem: the usa is bigger than denmark and they're not in a lot of wars like the usa is.
jadeyes914 1 year ago
@jadeyes914 Denmark is in Afghanistan and Iraq.
DinosaursOnceRuled 1 year ago
@killerbee2k #1 reform as is "improve", not become like USA.
amm2623 2 years ago
communism never happened in russia, that was socialism champ
cbtalis 2 years ago
I noticed you liken "muslim" to "liberal" to "socialist", as if they were all the same thing. You lump Obama in with every single group that Christian Fundamentalists scorn, and I wonder if you're not a fundamentalist yourself. Not that it matters. He got elected, get over it.
deathbotv1 2 years ago
I notice you liken "logic" to "garbled nonsense". Perhaps you could give examples of when someone "(liken "muslim" to "liberal" to "socialist")". Do you even know that you are typing or do you get on a free-internet computer in a pot-smoke filled dorm room and your hands just start going to town on the keyboard? Not that it matters, you have not had one coherent thought typed on here yet. You helped to elect a communist president, get over it.
micahxmp 2 years ago
You know what I don't understand about republicans when it comes to Obama and his faith? You try to rag on him for being a "muslim" (even though there would be nothing wrong if he were) but then turn around and give him grief for attending Trinity United Church of Christ for 20 years.
sexyfoxx86 2 years ago 3
ALL republicans?or some?you're making yourself sound just as bad as them.Nothing wrong with going to church. Freedom of Religion. A lot of people had a problem with the message of Liberation Theology. It justifies coercion of others to redistribute wealth all in the name of GOD.If you look at the record of history,leaders that talked like that usually ended up murdering people all in the name of social and economic justice.The LEFT is all about CONTROL and FORCE.Especially when it come to money.
Libertarian71776 2 years ago
I didn't say anything about all republicans. I said the republicans that rag on him for being a supposed muslim. Then turn around and rag on him for going to a christian church. It doesn't make sense.
sexyfoxx86 2 years ago 2
heh..."good man" and politician are two words that are very rarely used in the same sentence about the same person...if ever.
I think in order to be a good politician, you cannot be a good person at the core. You must compromise. You must play the game. You must be two faced.
It's our own fault. We used to be able to accept presidents with fake teeth, and wheelchairs, and speech impediments. Now we need the Obama girl.
fatsomamacheese 2 years ago
Besides, someone of your caliber does not deserve rational responses. You stand behind a president who has assumed office without providing the documents necessary for one to play little league baseball. Without knowing any of his position you supported a candidate who's policy was "change" and totally disregarded what "change" could possibly mean. Despite the warnings that he often spoke of hindering the free market, controlling industries and "spreading wealth" you would contend that he...
micahxmp 2 years ago
... you would contend that he is not a socialist and is just trying to fix Bush's mess. Such a position, behind such a man requires blissful ignorance of the facts at hand, total irrationality in argument in defense of position, blind allegiance to a man whom you have no idea where his allegiance lies and furthermore, it requires you to have the same thing as those people that I am sure you despise, called "christians"... FAITH. You have faith in a man, and men always fail. So too, have you.
micahxmp 2 years ago
I couldn't care less about Obama. It sounds like you have a hard-on for the guy. All I said is that you have no proof that he lacks a birth certificate and is a muslim. Your responses still didn't address those claims, and I doubt that any further response from you will either. You can believe whatever you want, but if you're going to make accusations and tout conspiracy theories, you should at least have some proof. Otherwise, no one will take you seriously, and I doubt that anyone does.
deathbotv1 2 years ago
I doubt anybody will take your non-comments about non-issues seriously, as you take non-stances in order to try to seem open minded. Your ignorance of where the burden of proof lies shows how foolish you are in your commenting. It is funny that you mention "conspiracy theories" as if such a thing proves kookiness. I am sure that all coups, all revolutions, all assassination, all wars have taken place without preponderance, forethought or planning which would be the hallmark of a conspiracy.
micahxmp 2 years ago
You have outlived your usefulness even for commenting on youtube videos. Perhaps Obama may have a position for a useful idiot as yourself so that you may infect others with your logical malfeasance.
micahxmp 2 years ago
Wow, you are the probably the craziest you tube commenter I have seen in a long time. Holy cow.
cegli214 2 years ago
Congratulations, you spelled "wow" correctly.
micahxmp 2 years ago
Actually, there are three things that idiotic conservatives have already forgotten about:
Massive GOP election fraud in 2000
Ken Blackwell and the Ohio voter fraud in 2004
Sarah Palin
And don't give me any of this ACORN bullshit. You know full well that no fraudulent votes came about as a result of that.
deathbotv1 2 years ago
HAHAHAHA. There are a few things you wackjobs always forget, every recount in 2000 had Bush winning, there was no evidence of Ohio voter fraud (except in your fantasy land blogspots) and the fact that Sarah Palin is at least twice as smart as Joe Biden, that fricken dumb peice of crap that was born with his foot in his mouth and always has some mythical story about mingling with "regular people" ... oh yeah and OBAMA is a COMMUNIST!
micahxmp 2 years ago
bloodtar: you underestimate how gullible the public is and how when you run on a generic message of "hope" and "change" that people insert all their own hopes and ideas onto that platform... even though O had no intention of actually doing any of that. claiming voter fraud as the reason completely misunderstands what the problem we face in our nation with people who don't recognize propaganda when they hear it.
nuclearspike 2 years ago
I dont think I've ever had a living hero... I think Ron Paul is the closest thing to one I've ever had.
WHY?!! Is he not our prez?!
profilmmaker 2 years ago 66
Oh but people voted for "change". Like he said last night: and in 3 1/2 more years they're still going to be waiting for it.
cpanthers190 2 years ago 7
And the cons are still gonna fear it.
plainlake 1 year ago
because he didn't receive enough votes. He didn't buy his election like obama did.
EasyHardLivin 2 years ago 7
True but, Obama had the power, wealth, and backing of the Democratic party. Obama also had the media hatred for Bush and the conservatives. Only when the people get tired of the same old stuff from the government will someone like Ron Paul get elected. Too many people in this country are out for themselves.
rhv201 2 years ago
my family voted for obama ... but i wud have voted for ron paul if i was 18.
sunnyahsan1 2 years ago 7
Because the media suppressed his message. I wish that I had known more about him before. I would have NEVER voted for Obama.
blaquelovely1 2 years ago 15
i AGREE 100% i think we as a country should vote obama out and put ron paul in charge of this repulic
MastRyo 2 years ago 6
@profilmmaker I agree fully with you ! Ron Paul, Peter Schiff and Julian Assange. Some of the truly great men of our time.
AlexanderHvass 1 year ago
@profilmmaker Because black is cooler than white.
69AfroThunda69 1 year ago
@profilmmaker This is a joke of a statement
StormsOfIntensity 1 year ago
Thats the asshole during the NH debate I think it was that asked that question, "Do have any [electability] sir?"
He needs to be bitchslapped.
jackr2777 2 years ago 11
yeah same dude from the debate!!! he needs to be slapped
jellofast 2 years ago 6
LOL
That guy got totally fired
simonistic 2 years ago 5
It's already been proven by internal memos , EVERYBODY is on a short leash at Fox , admitted by over a dozen former producers and reporters , that they have instructions on how to FRAME stories , what not to report , what to report , so lets drop the BS , Shepard Smith can talk like a reporter true , but his angle , his framing his controlled as well .
Fox is about supporting U.S. foreign policy , cheer leading invasions , supporting Israel ..blah blah ..its proven every day
franz909 2 years ago 7
Why is it always fox. All the others are on 'short leashes too" GE controls NBC and stands to make a lot of money off of Obama's green policies so they slant the news in hie favor that should bother everyone.
conservitgirl 2 years ago
Don't we all! Shep Smith is a good reporter. (I know that wasn't him) Fox news isn't all about b.s. and entertainment. But they have bills to pay and those of us that follow real news shouldn't be offended or feel threatened anyway.
heyzog 2 years ago
Isn't this piece cut out when it aired?
flixmsncom 3 years ago
The strange thing is this guy is the same guy that humiliated paul during the debates by asking "do you have any, sir?" regarding the question of electability..
Gangularis 3 years ago 7
you mean the same guy that GOT humiliated by Paul after asking such an idiotic question
oracle808 3 years ago 6
Right, and in this clip he is baiting Paul in front of recording cameras hoping to God that he can provoke something, anything that might discredit him. What is this buzzard's name anyway?
maximilian333 2 years ago
He's true, see these:
- Israel Lobby.
- Occupation 101
ryolight 3 years ago
Don't we all? What da hell does that mean?
jejojassy76 3 years ago
guess you need to ask a linguistic interpreter or something.
Muraabit 2 years ago
Just simple answers for difficult times, which demand much more thought-out and researched answers!!!
RJWooller 3 years ago 2
That reporter had the kind of smug face u just wanna punch again and again!!!!!!!!!!1 hehehe
schlongy2dope 3 years ago 9
seriously. that dude creeped me the fuck out
ragratt 3 years ago 4
The real reason why ron Paul was excluded from the NH debates is NH has a lot of libertarian independents that would've voted for Ron Paul. A big showing would've given Ron Paul a lot of momentum and Foxnews, which was instrumental in getting him shut out, didn't want that to happen.
nowayjose470 3 years ago
"States rights" isn't exactly a right in the way you're claiming Paul wants it to be, and he never said that. The concept of States Rights is based on the idea that power should never become too centralized; that a local government often knows how to govern better than a bureaucracy 2,000 miles away (Notwithstanding any state which denies personhood to anyone, for any reason; this is unacceptable).
That said, HR 300 doesn't appear to "annihilate checks and balances" at all.
Shockna 3 years ago
Carl Cameron's such a jackass. Look at the way he scowled at Paul when he's like "How are we doing?"
whoo689 3 years ago
the reporter, Camron, is Bush's friend
Salvatrucho213 3 years ago
If only Ron Paul had been all he claimed to be. I, too, believed in him, and you can see posts from me on his videos earlier this year supporting him.
But, he let me down. I don't mean by not doing better in the Primaries. I mean by his policies, his beliefs, his positions.
He is NOT — repeat: *NOT* — a libertarian. He's a neo-confederate (NOT to be confused with a Neo-Conservative — he most definitely is NOT THAT!).
This is a vital distinction.
COMALiteJ 3 years ago
interesting. never heard that one before.
so, in regards to Ron Paul, can you please compare and contrast HIS relationship to libertarianism and neo-confederatism (if that's even an "ism").
hpso12xu 3 years ago
Sure thing!
A libertarian is one who holds the Inherent and Unalienable Rights of Personhood as the ultimate force in politics and government.
A neo-confederate (so-named to distinguish them from the original Confederate States of America which included slavery) is one who holds that "States' Rights" is the ultimate power.
Now, what do we hear Ron Paul actually saying?
"We don't dictate to the states" (true enough on the face of it).
COMALiteJ 3 years ago
But he's gone way beyond that.
He has stated that the Bill of Rights does not apply to the States, that the Fourteenth Amendment was ratified under duress by the former Confederate States and so is invalid (which is how he can oppose Birthright Citizenship, which is explicitly stated in the Fourteenth).
He has said that States should even be able to establish official State religions! This would of course be VERY oppressive to the rights of the people of other religions in such States.
COMALiteJ 3 years ago
In word and deed, he has made it clear that he places "States' Rights" ABOVE the Inherent and Unalienable Rights of Personhood.
Thus, he is no libertarian, but a neo-confederate.
He calls himself "The Champion of the Constitution." But WHICH Constiutution?
In 2003, in an essay on the alleged "War on Christmas," he wrote that the Declaration and Constitution are "both REPLETE WITH references to God."
COMALiteJ 3 years ago
Gee, you'd think that the Champion of the Constitution would KNOW that the U.S. Constitution has ZERO references to God, other than a formal date in the accepted style of the time (spelling out the literal meaning of "Anno Domini" [what "A.D." in dates stands for]: "In the Year of Our Lord").
However, the Constitution of the CONFEDERATE States of America DOES explicitly invoke "Almighty God"!
Is THAT the Constitution he's the "Champion" of!?
COMALiteJ 3 years ago
By the way, I put "States' Rights" in "scare quotes" every time I mention it for a REASON.
You see, there IS NOT NOW, nor was there EVER (even before the Civil War), nor was there ever INTENDED TO BE, ANY SUCH *THING* as "States' Rights"!
The clear and plain language of the Declaration of Independence AND the Bill of Rights BOTH make plain that ONLY PERSONS have, or CAN have, RIGHTS! NO Government at ANY level, or any OTHER non-Person entity, can have Rights of ANY kind!
COMALiteJ 3 years ago
How do you recon he is a neoconfederate? I do think he is right on the important issues, but I hardly have the time to go IN depth.
AndersFriedrichsen 3 years ago
Read my responses to hpso12xu from six days ago. I explained it in some more detail.
I should also point out that he didn't just VOTE for, but actually AUTHORED and multiple times CO-SPONSORED, the horrendously mis-named "We the People Act" (most recently as H.R. 300).
This was a direct attack on the Constitutional Separation of Powers and system of Checks and Balances that help protect individual Liberties and Rights.
No Libertarian would do such a thing. That's Neo-Confederate stuff.
COMALiteJ 3 years ago
rofl i think it's fair to guess that the reporter hasn't got a job by now ...
UFOBelieve 3 years ago
Like they always say, only ask the questions that will give you the right response. This guy prolly thought he was a news reporter. He works for Fixed News for heavens sake. Ron Paul was polite but he could have been more honest about his answer.
iamwatchingus 3 years ago
OUCH!
Go Ron Paul!
dachinman 3 years ago 5
Rodman 332 makes an awesome point. Consider an alternate reality where Fox gave Ron Paul some viability and took him seriously. What if he was given more respect at the debate, like he deserves. Could Ron Paul have picked up the Republicans and those independent moderates also? How many Dems would have jumped ship on Obama? We'll never know, but it's still a great question that rodman brings to mind.
knab69 3 years ago
"How many Dems would have jumped ship on Obama?"
95% of Blacks and 67% of Latinos went on Obama, whereas whites kept their historical 43% dem 57% rep track. So the question is: would so many (minority) reps still have jumped ship to Obama if he was running aganst Ron Paul? Well, I doubt. Only another Black person will ever be able to beat Obama now, unless whites start voting racist like blacks and latinos.
Eikinkloster 3 years ago
sadly I think your right when I said that I would vote for ron paul I was called everything but a sell out. it is kind sad my people don't care what type of black president it is so long as it is a black president and I guarantee no matter what he does the media won't call him on it just so they won't be called racist
robinsl27 3 years ago
I just hope that Obama is one of the best Presidents we've had in recent memory.
The first-ever Black (or first-ever female, for that matter) President HAS to be. If a white male President messes up, we say, "Gee, that guy was a lousy President."
But you know — you just KNOW — that if Obama messes up, all too many people will be saying, "See what happens if you let a Black person* be President?"
(* or less polite words to that effect)
Ditto female, had Hillary won and messed up.
COMALiteJ 3 years ago 2
The sad thing is, he becomes president just when everything is up shit's creek. I would have like to see him become president when Bill left, or when the first Bush Left.
But you know this will all be put on Obama's foot as if he is the root of this mess we have in front of us, which is unfair, but he wanted the the duties....& he definitely got what he wished for.
But this much is guaranteed, there is no in between. Either he will be the greatest of all time, or one of the worst, either 1
thekid22585 2 years ago
Fortunately, the excrement hit the rotating bladed air propulsion device BEFORE the ELECTION, let alone the Inauguration. Only the willfully short-memoried can blame this mess on Obama.
Did you notice that the GOP acted like they didn't really WANT to win, UNTIL the bottom fell out? They nominated one of their LEAST charismatic candidates, then saddled him with the worst imaginable running mate. He didn't campaign aggressively, UNTIL the bottom fell out.
COMALiteJ 2 years ago
I suspect that the GOP knew what was coming, but hoped to hold the economy together with spit and bailing wire until after January 20, so that it would look like Obama's fault and thus not only cripple his re-election but also the chances of any future Black Presidents for at least a generation. Thus, they were basically taking a dive.
Unfortunately for them, they couldn't even hold it together until November 2, let alone January 20. The damage Bush did was simply too severe to be held back.
COMALiteJ 2 years ago
Obama was hand picked like every other US P. except kenedy and lincon and guess what they were both murdered. They chose obama to play the nice guy act after a rain of bush terror so the people would easily accept him. Obama is continuing bush's terroist acts just in a not so transparent manner. Obama said he would take troops outa Iraq and he did but he just moved them to Afagan. see the deception he did what he said, he dint say anything abt bringing them home, just outa iraq
E30m3EvoVIIIMR 2 years ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
What is ........ F-O-X-N-E-W-S ??
Its true HIDDEN MEANING uncovered through my ANAGRAM ....
by re-arranging the following (62) letters ...
FOXNEWS: LIES, FEAR and SMEAR PROPAGANDA ....
FOR THE CONSERVATIVE REPUBLICANS !!
>>> Result of these same (62) letters now re-arranged =
FOREVER RATS, FIXED ON A PRO-WAR AGENDA ....
FALSE~PRESSMAN, CONS THE NAIVE PUBLIC !!
Visit >>> FoxAttacks(dot)com
PASS IT ON ...
librophile 3 years ago
Leaving my house now to go write-in RON PAUL for President '08!!!
See you guys @ the polls. :)
NOCFRCANDIDATES08 3 years ago 2
sarcasm! That journalist is a long time worker at fox!
bjlewis101 3 years ago
Damn the media REALLY fucked Ron Paul. They try to show him as crazy and "un-electable". If the media was for Ron Paul, he would win the election by a CLEAR MILE. This shows that the president is now chosen by the media, they lie and feed this bs and most people (ignorant) believe it.
rodman332 3 years ago 10
not really because a lot of the media aimed towards mccain, especially fox news.
JPhillippeMusic 3 years ago
RON PAUL= POLITICAL GENIUS!!!!!...
NEVER HAvE I SEEN THIS TYPE OF POLITICIAN>>
NOT FOR POWER OR CONTROL OR FINANCE...
A REAL LEADER>>>>
DaTokYOhuStLER 3 years ago 5
We need more people like Ron Paul.
vepegapa 3 years ago 8
that Reporter is so Coked. awsome though truth comes out when your smacked hey, maybe just needed some sleep?
theblackBay 3 years ago 4
"Don't we all" I'll never forget those words, because behind all this BS in government lies the phrase "Don't we all" want to see an end to this corruption.
madmagic3000 3 years ago 8
ron paul was a prophet in this campaign season, of the federal reserve's control which makes for bad public policy
jeffbrown8 3 years ago 3
"i wish it would be fair and balanced" was kinda mean lol.
i know he didnt want to, but i really wish ron would've run under the libertarian party. he could have had a legitimate shot at winning this thing.
eatmyballllz 3 years ago
not this time i hope ron is able to run in 2012 when the republican party collapse and is libertarian vs democrat(hopefully)
arga400 3 years ago 2
Damn that would be nice! Hehehe. I don't see the republican party collapsing though. It'll probably just reform to keep its "competativeness" against the democrats. It seems politics doesn't matter as long as you're in charge when it comes to the democrats and republicans. The libertarian party are the pretty much the only one who have said the same things all the time :P
dradeel 3 years ago
If there ever will be a new election. Theyre kind decieving us into dictatorship so I'm not so hopeful...
corruptionoftiesto 3 years ago
RP was this country's last chance to get back on track!
pebblesj5 3 years ago 5
that guy's fired lol. Good for him. It's time for everyone to stand up for what we believe in.
pandemonic01 3 years ago 2
Fox is a fucking Joke.
Who watches Fox? Short Bus riders, that's who.
MACKATTACK1970 3 years ago 10
WRITE HIM IN!!!
Kward107 3 years ago
America IS the Constitution. Ron Paul is America! The more I listen to him the more I realize how far the Republican party, and to a larger degree America's following of the Constitution, has gone off course. It can hardly be called America. Because America is the Constitution and Bill of Rights. If you haven't read it or read it lately, check out the Bill of Rights, which protects the people from their own government. And weep. Founding Fathers knew the biggest threat wasn't an external enemy.
BubbaGanoush2 3 years ago 4
wow that was the same asshole who asked if he had any electability. what a two faced p.o.s.
i cant believe they sit there and laugh at this
after they put on a show for the meatbots.
KritikalDimensions 3 years ago
It was a valid question. I agree that he has electability, but it was widely questioned by the current basis of the Republican party so it should've been asked and he answered very well.
seaofseeof 3 years ago
mainstream media is NOT fair and balanced at all...but yes I do like Ron Paul...it is too bad that he lost in the primaries
purse88 3 years ago 5
WRITE HIM IN!!!!
Kward107 3 years ago
NO, do not write Ron Paul in. He isn't registered in any states. No one will no you wrote in his name. He endorsed 4 other 3rd party candidates and wants all his supporters to vote for one of them. ([McObamain]) never have to listen to us until we prove to them that we won't listen to them. They never will listen to us either until we prove this. In order for our voice to be heard, we must vote 3rd party.-where it will count.
purse88 3 years ago 2
FOX loves to cut off non-CFR members from getting air time.
KevZen2000 3 years ago 2
Proof the elections are rigged, or else people like Ron Paul would win.
How could Bush be president and not ron paul? Wow...
Brett32324 3 years ago 8
I'm a Liberal, and I would vote for Ron Paul.
FalseFlagAvenger 3 years ago 4