Added: 3 years ago
From: melski101
Views: 91,003
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (520)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Definitely from an apache. If it was an ac130 the camera would have been rotating around the trucks

  • this is an AH-64 apache crazy

  • Fair Warning. If your up to no good, somebody with a big ass gun is gonna be watching you.

  • Jesus... That first guy went all over the place.

  • Beautiful

    *Tears up*

  • thaats in sain

  • This is the beat video ever

  • Lol that guy just wanted to blow the truck up. Wounded guy dragging himself across the road or the empty truck? I'm gonna go for the empty truck.

  • that's a AH-64 not a AC-130,just for the record :)

  • US cheated, they did get the kill streak to us the AC130

  • I like how the first guy exploded :D

  • Swiss cheese!

  • It seems like a LOT of PRECIOUS time is wasted with these guys taking back and forth. I hear EARLY ON to engage, but yet more talking, talking, talking.

    When you get the fucking order to engage...ENGAGE.

  • makes me want to join the the army lol yea fuck them with an AC 130

  • dude it was farming tools he dropped a shovel

  • Mohammedans are the scum of the Earth.

  • fuck the GOVERMENT fucking illuminati faggots they have to die 1 by 1

  • Ghost pro would of come in handy

  • "hit im'. Hit the truck and him".

  • in the words of ghost "good noight"

  • yes!! fuck those terrorists!

  • damn really disturbing lol but in the other case thats what they get

  • wat an amazing weapon

  • American pigs have no respect for the Geneva Conventions.

  • @Cabal777 FYI. The Geneva convention only applies to those people who are signed onto the document. Last i checked, the Taliban didn't sign it haha. That, and they wouldn't even meet the requirements to sign it in the first place. They have no easily recognizable uniform, they operate under no standard, recognized flag, nor under the authorization of any government who is signed to the convention. You should fact check before you bash America retard.

  • @valinteno1190 FYI, American, GC also applies if one party to an armed conflict signed it. Your favorite Uncle-Sam-Shit-Pants HAS ratified it. Shooting the wounded is an act so low on the scale on morality only a mindless fat cockroach like yourself can praise it. YOUR ARROGANCE cost you the twin-towers, but you are just too dumb hick to learn.

  • @Cabal777 Actually the GC was signed by the US as an agreement not to rendition out the citizens or POW's of a nation that has also signed it, it's not about war conduct. I never said that we didn't sign it. HOWEVER the Taliban has not. Therefore, they aren't covered by it, so we can kill 'em if we want. And shooting him after he was already hit was an act of mercy not mindless rampage, you think he woulda lived comfortably after eating a bullet from an Apache. Dont think so, he was dying anyway

  • @Cabal777 And by the way, if you're throwing the morality argument around, shooting a wounded man (Who was dying regardless) is higher up on the list that what these scum bag terrorists do on a regular basis, I.E blowing up market places and killing kids. It wasn't arrogance that caused 9/11 dumbass, it was a lunatic Muslim extremist who was butt hurt that Saudi Arabia trusted us to oust Saddom from Kuwait more than him. Go read up on your history, ya might learn somethin.

  • @valinteno1190 so basically your laughing at the fact that USA is taking advantage of a legal loophole in a human rights Treaty. Pathetic.

  • @Cabal777 lol yeah the geneva convention banns apaches? Fucking moron

  • Did I just see that guy's head fly off at 2:32?

  • Anyone know what aircraft is being used here? Im guessing either a AC-130 Spooky or an Apache.

  • LOL niiiiiiiiiiiiiiiice!!!!!!!

  • good lord imagine being under that truck not knowing what the fuck is shooting at you , Id shit my pants and pray to god lol If that doesnt work id slowly walk towards them with my arms in the air and lay down

  • Yeah, kill those bastard terrorists cowards!

  • See theres the political bullshit. They saw and identified a weapon. It should have been a go to take them down instantly...how can we fight this war , if the politicians behind their desks are telling us how to do it, and at their descretion....pure bullshit!

  • 1 killer closer to a nuke

  • No remorse for these pigs EAAT SHIT!!! HOOOAH

  • remember sept 11, pity the enemy

  • thats right

    we see you

    but you cant see us...

  • this is fuckin badass haha

  • I like it when a terrorists is being killed :D,

    fuck the terrorists, and long live America!

  • @ivarblaauw1

    mit der Freiheitsflagge eure Landes wird ich mir nicht einmal den Arsch wischen

    Long Loive Germany !

  • @KopKranker

    haha, naturlich bin ich auch fur Deutschland, ich liebe den zahle ;).

    Deutschland is gewön Niederland, aber anderes zahl. Deutschland hat eine slechtes Historie (Gut geschrieben?) aber ich gehe skifahren im winter in Deutschland, so long live the west ;),

  • good job !!!

  • 2:20

  • okay, shooting the wounded guy wasn't necessary, was it? better pick him up and ask some questions.

  • @Cult1022 He would have died regardless, you don't take a few rounds from an Apache and walk it off lol.

  • @valinteno1190 ture that but this is not an apache, AC-130 spectre gunship

  • @lookhowlongmyusernam Ah my bad, don't know why i put apache. Irregardless, my comment still hold true lol.

  • Comment removed

  • @valinteno1190 look and count exactly the nulbers of people and trucks.. in the beginning there's 1 truck and a pick up.. and there's 2 "bad guys" comin' out of these to meet.. then the guy ran of, drop the gun and comes back.. THEN comes the innocent one when one of the bad guys gets back into the field.. at exactly 2:11.. so i agree with you for the 2 first truck but then comes the tractor.. and the first guy to get shoot is the innocent farmer... look close, i'm not inventing..

  • @XenomorphIX Huh, i didnt notice the guy on the tractor. Could he have been innocent. Maybe. I don't know. It'd be unfortunate if he was. However, these things happen, in any war, waged by anyone. One of the things that makes the US great is these things dont happen very often. Do they happen? Yes. Do they happen all the time? No. One sad truth about war, is the fact that people die. Innocent? Maybe? Guilty? Maybe? Do we know? No. Can we know? No. It's unfortunate but sometimes, shit happens.

  • Thats DEFINATELY an appache

  • Happy to pay for that...cheers

  • THIS IS AH64D!

    You need more??

    You have more! THIS GUNSOUND IS FROM AH64D.

    you dont known anything about ac130 and ah64 ;) you must learn much much more

  • THIS IS AH64D no AC130

    ac130 cant hover, ac130 is a modified c130 cargo plane. On this video we can see hovering helicpoter.

    THIS DISPLAY IS FROM AH64D, ONLY THIS HELICOPTER HAVE TADS system and this sensor position indicator on down of picture.

  • do you realize that one innocent victime is killed in this video?? at 2:20 it's only a farmer with is truck taking care of its field and the gun left by that other guy was in his way.. and he is the first one to die... collateral damage that could have been avoid if US soldier were less trigger happy killer...

  • @XenomorphIX Really, and how exactly do you know it was a farmer? When the trucks rolled up that guy was already waiting there for them, they talked, then tossed a weapon into he field, and were fired upon. The gun left by the other guy was in his way? Way of what exactly it's in the middle of a field!?

  • @valinteno1190 isn't it obvious that's a tractor in the field and the gun is in its way? and when the guy run off into the field to "abandon" the gun, tractor isn't there.. but you clearly see trails in the field and behind the tractor when he shows up, means that the guy is just "plowing" (not sure is the good word, english isn't my first language) his field.. and farmer talk to the guys to say probably "take your shit out of my field".. farmer was innocent i'm pretty sure of it..

  • @XenomorphIX The gun wasn't in the way of the tractor sitting to the side of the road. He took it out of the truck they drove up in and ran, and tossed it into the field. He then went back, and was fired upon. The guy who went back to the field was the same guy who tossed the gun there in the first place. Innocent? I think not.

  • @Unterstutzungsfeuer

    Ok, well good observation. I just cringe when I hear people call countries a super power, when there really is no clear definition of what it is and who it is.

  • @CazK88 The generally accepted definition of a superpower is a nation that possess both Military and economic dominance over a region and can compete at a competitive level with other "Superpowers". Example, The U.S and Russia during the Cold War were two feuding "Superpowers" Bother were strong in both Military and Economy's (Well, Russia's economy was...eh). A modern day example. The U.S is the only current superpower, but emerging superpowers are Iran, China, Germany and Russia (Again).

  • @valinteno1190 Hmm...I have sort of an issue though...based on your definition of a "super power", you honestly think Russia has what it takes to be one (again)? They are not competitively advantaged to challenge, US, China or Germany at this point. And you left out countries like Britan and France. Where do they fall? See, lol...this is why the definition is very versatile in its meaning. When people talk superpower, what do you talk about is the real question. And how is Germany with no army?

  • @CazK88 Russia has the potential to become a superpower again, by the definition i provided. I listed Germany, Russia, China (Though now that i think about it China should be listed as a superpower) and Iran as "Emerging" superpowers. The Russians are build their Army back up and reorganizing it. Their economy is on the upward, but they won't by any means be a superpower by tomorrow. You're right i did leave out Brittan and France...(See next comment)

  • @valinteno1190

    Yes, but I still don't see Russia reemerging, even in the next 50 years. For one thing, their population is decreasing, health care is so expensive, the people there drink their lives to death and they have problems dealing with the Chechen rebels. Most of their defense spending is for domestic terrorism. Less money going into int'l defense forces. But yes, China is a modern version of a super power. As you said, we owe them money!

  • @CazK88 We owe them lots of money haha. The Russians beginning to build back their army and are putting more funding in their counter-intel agencies. They've been becoming a pain in the rear again. Though they by no means will become a superpower with the strength they once enjoyed, they're becoming a force to me reckoned with again. They're able to through some weight around in the UN once again.

  • Forgiving or punishing the terrorists is left to God. But, fixing

    their appointment with God is our responsibility

    - Indian Army

  • @gauravzerogravity :)):)):))

  • ENGAGE GODDAMMIT!!

  • @Unterstutzungsfeuer

    So we hear these talks about the Department of Defense worried about the capabilities of China, N. Korea and Iran (now and in the future)...your opinion...can they come close to what we have? Can they really challenge us like the Soviet Union did?

  • @CazK88 China holds something like 50%+ of our debt bonds, leave them be for a bit haha. As for their Military Tec. (I.E China's Stealth Fighter) They stole it from us, so we know what it can, and cannot do. N. Korea is going through some political upheaval so their not so much an issue at the moment. Iran is a big issue, their hostile to us and have basically had a proxy take over of Iraq (In all but name) and are on the road to establishing an Oil Cartel and dominance over the Middle East.

  • @valinteno1190

    Germany does not have an offensive force and cannot project power like it dud during WW2. So how can Germany be one? If you say military AND economic dominance, then if they are missing one, then that makes them not a super power. And how is Iran? They don't possess nuclear weapons (yet) They so far are only a regional power (or advancing to). China is a regional power. LOL..see how confusing this is..?

  • @CazK88 ...However Brittan and France don't posses the Military strength to qualify as a Superpower (By the internationally accepted definition) Though they are strong. Germany is rebuilding their army, they've recently discarded the Post WW2 restriction on their Army's size and power, and they currently have the strongest and richest economy in Europe. Iran has established it's dominance in the Middle East, they rival the Saudis in power, and they control a hell of a lot of oil. Regional power.

  • @valinteno1190 I did not realize Germany is now being allowed to have an army again. When did this happen? Did the same go for Japan? Yes I do see Iran and Saudi Arabia at odds. The Saudis don't like the Iranians anyway, and if we get into a war with Iran the Saudis and Israelis are in. With all of this instability in the middle east now, happening to pro-American nations, this is where Iran see's opportunity to gain dominance in the middle east.

  • @CazK88 I wouldn't say Germany's being "Allowed" to rebuild their army, they've decided they paid enough for what happened in WW2 and are going to run their country their way. They may even back out of the EU, along with France, maybe even Spain and Italy. I don't believe Japan is doing the same, though i might be mistaken. Yes it wouldn't surprise me if Iran took advantage of this instability to do what they did in Lebanon with Hezbollah, to Egypt, Bahrain, Yemen, ect...

  • @valinteno1190

    In a way, I lean towards allowing Germany and Japan the opportunity to militarize again. If you look at the types of allies the U.S. has (Britain, France, Germany, Japan), have small armies. Nothing to wage war to that standpoint and really are for defensive purposes. If these nations have the ability to emerge militarily, we could have stronger allies to help in the fights. But I guess on 2nd thought, the U.S. may be scared Germany or Japan may pass us militarily lol..

  • @CazK88 I have no problem with Germany/Japan re militarizing, or being allowed to deploy their troops outside of Germany&Japan (Which they are forbidden to do currently). One thing the Germans do well, which may be why they still have strong restrictions on them, is build a big and strong army, really quickly. Which would make some EU nations very nervous. I don't see, however, any nation passing us Militarily any time soon. We're constantly growing stronger, always updating our arsenals.

  • @valinteno1190

    Very true! Well you have a very interesting take on this stuff and I agree with nearly all of what you say. I think our future will be quite interesting to see. Especially with China in the way. This places the U.S. in a bit of a rivalry with many nations because as we are the preponderant power in the world, there might be challenges in regions like S.E. Asia (Chinese influence) and the Middle East (Iran influence), where we might lose influence in these regions. Interesting..!

  • @CazK88 We've already lost quite a bit of influence in the middle east. This whole Egypt business put us in a bad light, backing out on our ally for the second time. The Saudis don't trust us anymore because of it. Not to mention the Brits are pissed with us to. The gov't. essentially gave the Russians the blueprint to England's nuclear defense network, without their permission, to get the Russians to sign the New S.T.A.R.T treaty. Worlds goin to hell in a hand-basket. Interesting times...

  • @valinteno1190

    I don't know if Egypt placed us in a bad light. I think it's more of showing the world that we really do side with the people. If you are a strong liberal democracy, like the US, being a role model for change and democracy is what the people expect from a nation like the US. I do think the anti-American regimes are accurate when they say most US-backed regimes in the middle east are unstable per the recent uprisings, but I don't think the influence is gone per se.

  • @CazK88 Don't get me wrong the people turning to democracy is great. This was however a very, tender situation. Not in a bad light per say, but it certainly didn't help our image. Backing out on an ally never does (And this is the second time it's happened within these 2 years.) so people are not in the best of moods with us. Not all US-backed regimes are shaking, but most of the Middle East and Northern Africa are seeing ripples from this, some more than others.

  • @valinteno1190

    I don't think the Saudis don't trust us. Again, when you are talking about a country, you are not only talking about the government, but the people of the country. The people will see the US as a true symbolism of democracy and that the US backs the people in any type of regime change for the improvement of society. What gov't are you talking about that gave blueprints to Russia? The Saudis hold a strong relationship with us.

  • @CazK88 I meant "Saudis" to be directed at the Royal Family, sorry for any confusion there. The US government was the ones that gave the "Blueprints" essentially of England's Trident Missile Defense Network to the Russians , without England's consent, in order to secure their signature on the "New S.T.A.R.T" treaty. We build and maintain their Trident missiles/Nuclear defense systems. We own them like China owns us. And they're pissed about it.

  • @valinteno1190

    Hm..when was this? I never knew about that blueprints give away. You have a source on that? We build and maintain Russia's trident systems? And you know what, back on China, I will take back saying China is a super power. Militarily they aren't technically. They only have one carrier. In order to project your power, you must have carriers and a large navy/air force. I don't think China is up to par with this...then again I'm no military analyst. LOL.

  • @CazK88 Yes, the news of the "Betrayal" came from, of all places, Wikilinks (lol). I simply goggled "Obama Betrays England, Trident Missiles, Russia, START [Google them all at once, narrows your search parameters]" and quite a few places came up. We (The US) do build and maintain England's Trident Missiles, but not Russia's (Did I say Russia? My mistake.). Even China's Carrier isn't superb. They got that Tec. from us. Like their new stealth plane. It was ours, it crashed in Kosovo.

  • @valinteno1190

    Hahaha...this is why I think China is only fronting everything. Did you see their "airforce" footage taken from the Top Gun film? Hahaha.. Well, England relinquished their power since WW2. It's a shame because they were such a strong power one time. But even the US has lost power because we once used to wage wars on our own. We can't do it without the UN or NATO now.

  • @CazK88 Oh yes we've lost some power. the new S.T.A.R.T treaty is one example of a stupid action that places us at a disadvantage. A disadvantage with, of all people , the Russians. The cold war never truly ended, yet people seem to think and act like we're beast friends with our old foes. No i haven't seen the China "airforce" footage from top gun, I'll have to look it up lol

  • @valinteno1190

    Yes please do take a look. Go to google and look up "China's top gun features". You won't help but laugh.

    And I do believe the Cold War is over, but the strategic thinking and tools of diplomacy and intervention used during the Cold War still exist. Spies are still there which develop statecraft, hard power approaches still exist to gain a geopolitical advantage and the politics with the START treaty. US and Russia are "friends", but not FRIENDS.

  • @CazK88 The cold war may be over on paper, but we've still doing the same things we were then. Everyone is. England spies on us, we spy on Russia, they spy on China, China spy's on rice, everyone still spying on everyone. And we all still take shots at each other every now and then. Some "Ex" KGB guys released a virus to our defense computers in Afghanistan a few years back, broke all our Flashdrives. We....did something back to them. Same old, same old, That's why i say it never truly ended.

  • @valinteno1190

    No, I agree. Pragmatically it still exists just as I said. But with the help of the collapse of the USSR, it caused it to be less a primary issue as it once was for nearly half a century. And as I mentioned, spying is part of statecraft. A practice heavily used during the Cold War to gain advantages over one another's rival. Same thing today. China sends several economic spies to gain an advantage on their business structure to continue a strong economy.

  • @CazK88 Yes, though the collapse of the USSR had little to do with cooling the cold war on any measure other than pushing it out of the public eye. After they fell the common person "forgot" in a sense and it moved on from their life. But its still as on going as it was before. China spies on everything haha. It's funny though, they're an interesting blend of a mostly Capitalistic Economy wile keeping a very Communist Government.

  • @valinteno1190

    Well what can you say eh? This is where China prevails..a mixture of both isn't too bad...although I can see one day the Chinese people attempting to overthrow the government. Oh, what a day that will be!! They tried once in '89. We'll see! China overwhelms the U.S. in spies. Thank goodness for technology, because I don't see how we could keep up without it. I see China as the new USSR this century. Sad but true.

  • @CazK88 Oh i would love to see the day China ousts the commies haha. I agree though, they certainly are the new USSR on the block. Makes it all the more painful that we keep borrowing money from them.

  • @valinteno1190

    Exactly right!! :-)

  • Great Video!

  • God will send these apache crew to hell for doing something so over the top.

  • @vsboy25 God will send you to hell for raping koala's you blocking slack jawed faggot

  • @vsboy25 How about hijacking civilian aircraft and flying them into civilian buildings? Is that "over the top", too?

  • @loneil12 These people had nothing to do with 9/11 you uneducated ignorant fool, these people are insurgents who opposed US forces been in there country in there view unjustly.

    9/11 was carried out by a hand full of people so get with the facts, an the use of 30MM tank cannon rounds on a human in such a way is unacceptable an must be banned.

  • @vsboy25 If 9/11 had not happened, the US military would not be there now. Is inviting insurgents to coffee and doughnuts for peace talks more acceptable to you than 30MM rounds? Typical civilian pantywaist!

  • @loneil12 Listen here you little girl, you probably never attended expensive private schools like me so I appreciate your ignorance, but their has been MANY wars prior to 9/11 you fool.

    This action only spawns more hate an more aggression is it that hard to predict consequences of such actions.

    THE MEN could have been arrested but in typical American style they where dispatched by firing cannon rounds at them in turn potentially risking further attacks against US troops in revenge attacks.

  • @vsboy25 These men were wiped out in the process of them planting IEDs, so they are not innocent. Since you feel so badly for the insurgents, why don't you join them, since you don't appreciate the fact that you have the freedom to get on Youtube and post whatever you want, in English. Not Arabic, Urdu, Japanese, or German. Try visiting Normandy or Arlington Cemetery, then with your excellent education you will understand the price that has been paid for your freedom to say whatever you want.

  • @loneil12 Listen here you little troll, freedom is what it is , American troops an others don’t fight for the freedom of these countries , they fight for government agendas an greed an they are the lower levels of society who die for the government’s plans.

    You really need to stop watching fox news and your delusional an your mind is corrupted with American propaganda.the only justifable war was world war 2.

  • @vsboy25 If your private school education was so excellent, please expound on what the government agendas are, since your instructors taught you to think (?) independently, and spell properly without using Spellchecker. By the way, "an" is supposed to be "and", not "your" but "you're" as in a contracted form of "you are". And please contact Fox News (not lowercase fox news) and tell them you don't agree with their agendas. You have the freedom to do so, thanks to the lower levels of society.

  • @loneil12

    I don’t use spell check as I don’t need too an second I don’t waste my time on perfect English on you tube .

    The Agendas are clear, corporate greed, secure oil production, expand military bases and sites, an expand power in developing economies.

    See little boy the world is ALL ABOUT MONEY not freedom now be gone from my sights.

  • @vsboy25 I hope your professors don't see your spelling (?) as they would be mortified that their efforts were for nil. Not "too" (a synonym for also) but "to" (as "I don't need to"). It would be fun to see the answers you would get in an editorial column regarding what you claim are agendas. You can't buy freedom with money. I have spent enough time trying to straighten out your misguided ideas of freedom. Have a nice day.

  • @loneil12 You act like some big shot English professor, but your comments are generic an lack any real substance.

    Americas government always has attempted to buy freedom for countries they want to control and monopolize an has almost always failed.

    Go back to your dictionary an grammar books as I am thinking outside the box, something Americans never can do as they are trapped in a cocoon also known as the U.S.A

  • @vsboy25 I thought you ordered me to be gone from your sights. You are obviously a victim of a public education in spite of your claims of private school. Visit those countries that you claim are victims of American monopolization, and educate them with your kind benevolence, since you want what is best for them. Whether or not they accept your offer of education is another matter. By the way, take some dictionaries and grammar books with you; you will need them. I don't. (smile)

  • @loneil12 Your very arrogant I must say, an yes I would love to help these people build a better life an give them the opportunity to live in peace.

    These attacks are unnecessary, yeah the guy is hiding a gun big deal, have some ground units retrieve the weapon and detain the men.

    There is no need to blast them with cannon rounds with a blast overpressure sufficient enough to disable heavy armor.

    You really need to get into the real world an start to think more compassionately .

  • @vsboy25 You're right; cannon rounds are too much. A round from a .357 Magnum is more cost-effective. By the way, compassion doesn't work in the real world; a swift kick in the chops does. If sticking to my opinion makes me "arrogant", so be it.

  • @loneil12 Well God will judge your character, what can I say your very inhumane person , Americans need to claim down seriously way too aggressive.By the way i mean arrest them not kill them.

  • @vsboy25 The same aggressiveness that sends aid to disaster-ravaged countries? What does "claim down" mean? Must be private school lingo for "calm down". If you're so concerned about compassion, join the Peace Corps and donate your time and energy to help poverty-stricken people in other countries.

  • @loneil12 Stop mocking my elite education just because you can’t afford to attend an Ivy League school does not mean you have to hate on others.

    People who attend expensive private schools an Ivy League schools are better than others in society.

    I am done with someone of your class so this will be my last response to you as you are too indoctrinated in American foreign policy.America does great things but almost always does evil things to counter that effort.

  • @vsboy25 You still haven't answered my question about helping out other people, your Elite Compassioness. Do Ivy Leaguers need to visit the bathroom, or are they too superior for that? I am sure I will hear from you again, in spite of your claims to the contrary.

  • Brings a tear to my eye seeing those bastards get wasted!

  • thank you and thats all folks!

  • @Unterstutzungsfeuer

    That's right because when I read the title, I started to question if this really was the 130 after reading the description. So, explain again for me..which one is the aircraft that is higher and has a longer range? These choppers must be extremely high if they are unable to see it coming at them. This guncamera must have an extreme zoom as well.

  • @Unterstutzungsfeuer

    But the AC-130 does have some sort of automatic gun on it doesn't it?

  • OH YEAH, ICE CREAM FOR TEA TONIGHT BOYS! :)

  • when they doubled back to the 1st guy they killed you can see he splattered allover th field

  • USA! USA! USA!

  • good kill good kill

  • the question still arises can you positively ID weapons? if so they are fair game, if not then why engage????

  • @chewbacca0412 Yes you can positively I.D weapons. All that is in the footage is them requesting a green light to shoot, and then doing so. We don't authorize a strike on people unless we have something to go off of, some kind of Intel. That being some insurgent activity in the area (Probably the reason they were flying there in the first place). Simple farm folk don't run into fields in the middle of the night and toss an object that looks like a weapon on the ground, then run back.

  • i must say. PWND

  • the footage is purposely scrambled the view from the chopper is perfectly clear and magnified

  • farmers i guess.......motherfuckers are some dead ass farmers now!!!

  • how do you know its at night? at 2.15 in the footage that is a tractor, in the near ground behind it is the recently ploughed part of the field, it is common practice to switch to thermal until you get a 'Hot Spot' then concentrate on that, ask yourself can you honestly positivily ID an RPG. earrlier in the footage what is he pacing out, a football (soccer) pitch????

  • how do you know its at night?

  • An RPG, wheres the RPG? That bundle that he drops in a field? could be anything! and how do you know its at night? if your comment is 'Shit Happens, its War' you obviously have no concept of modern warfare!!

  • @chewbacca0412 Farmers? WTF Are They Growing In Some Dry Ass Dirt . Why TF Would You Be Running Around Wit Farmer Tools? And Who TF Farms At Night . Out Of All The Shit Going On Over There Why Would They Wanna Kill Some Farmers . And IF You Cant Tell The Difference Between Night Nd Day On These Vidz Then Obviously You Dont Know WtF Modern WarFare Is

  • as proved, they were FARMERS!! How can you positively identify weapons at that range? and you wonder why they turn on you when you are on patrol

  • @chewbacca0412 I clearly see the guy carrying around and RPG and what does farmers do running around like that in the middle of the night? IF they where farmers, shit happens. Its war. Get over it.

  • @chewbacca0412 ...my brother was in Croatia and it was a common pratice for old shepherds to move their sheep through known minefields, ignoring signs and soldiers warnings, intentionally sacrificing thier sheep so that the militia could get through and set up mortar positions, and snipers. Then the UN soldiers then made it a policy to warn the shepherd about the mines, and if he kept going, start shooting the sheep.

    Sometimes innocent farmers are not what you think.

  • That is PURE SEXYNESS!!! Thank you to our Armed forces!! Iam STOKED to be an AMERICAN!!

  • There plowing a field you can see the plow marks behind the tractor..ARE YOU SURE IT WAS A WEAPON..Answer positive...it turned out to be a pice of exhaust for the tractor when the patrols whent to look the next day...but hey the brought down the world trade towers with a plastic knife ,,,who knows what they could do with a pice of tractor exhaust,,

  • ... ARE THEY DEAD!?

  • it just looks like farmers looking at a tractor . but hey people have died for less

  • As your title say "Bad terrorist killed" is there good terrorists ones as well?

  • Comment removed

  • @Blavits they are OK.

  • watch it again. its almost like they knew something was up runnin back and forth like they could hear the chopper but thought it was too far away or something. but the were up to something bad.

  • YEAHHH DO WORK

  • wouldn't it have sucked if that was just some piece of famr equipment

  • Hahahahahahaha... Silly towel-heads.

  • 2 miles away and the bullets instantly reached the ground after firing whoa

  • @vsboy25 we didn't call the Iraqi police because before we entered Iraq, the Insurgency was better armed, better equipped, more common, and I dare say maybe even (some of them) better trained, though probably not.

  • @darthgarfield We didn't call the Iraqi police because they were under command of Saddam. And, in addition to declaring war and invading to root out the Taliban, we were there for him. The insurgency was not better armed, equipped or trained but they do have the advantage of blending in with the regular civilian population. As they are from, the regular civilian population. Which is why it's extremely difficult to win these wars.

  • @darthgarfield what the fuck? dont say shit because it sounds like it might be a valid point, you have to make sure it is a valid point.

  • just one more thing..u americans try to justify something that makes these brave soldiers lose their lives.. america has so many financial problems with health care etc. and instead of trying to fix it, u spend millions in something u have NO BENEFIT at all just to prove how powerful you are.. just type AMAZING SPEECH BY WAR VETERAN and see the 1st video.this is a REAL patriot.. and pay attention when he says, he wasnt fighting terrorists, HE was the terrorist.. what are gou going to say now?

  • @alieninvestigator We tried to "Fix" health-care by passing Obama care which costs Trillions that we don't have. The new congress, we hope, will do as they say to reduce the national debt, so we are doing something about it. And we're not flexing our muscles there, we're hunting down and killing the people responsible for 9/11. And you can't take the word of one man going against the words of almost every other soldier. If HE acted like a terrorist then HE was acting against our objective.

  • Love it!

  • Sweet! Remember 9/11

  • Let's use some common sense:

    - 3:00 video and the camera doesn't move significantly?

    - even at 3,000 fps it would take over 4 seconds for the bullets to get there.

    It's NOT an AC-130 2.5 miles away.

    More likely: An Apache on the order of 1/2 mile away.

  • @vsboy25 you don't get it do you. These guys aren't soldiers they're jihadists. They PLAN to die for their cause, and they will NOT surrender to a plane 2.5. mi. away. Sometimes they do surrender to people up close, but that's because they think they would be more useful to their cause within the US justice system. God bless everyone in Iraq/ Afghanistan.

  • It's a load of Hollywood bollocks. "shoot to wound" in reality is a farce. You just unload in the enemy's direction until you are fairly certain he has no breath left in his lungs.

  • @Thebloodking. Fair one. Im on side with you totally. I just like a lively debate. I'm fully in support with any coalition military personnel regardless of country of origin over the terrorist scum we are fighting. Deep down I have total respect for US military.

  • Palestinian reporter killed on tv. I remember that one well. You can't allow yourself to get emotional about conflict though, it will fuck with your head. You need a big dose of emotional hardness out in Afghanistan and previously Iraq. It's a pretty fucked up conflict, and I can say that as I've done a tour in each. As the famous quote says: "gentlemen it's a huge shit sandwich and we've all got to take a bite"

  • Anyone who claims SF affiliation on a public forum like this has got to be treated with a huge fucking shovel of suspicion. It's like me saying "my one true Achilles heel is kryptonite BUT DONT TELL ANYON". Yeah mate ok. I've worked in the military for a few years and trust me SF, true SF personnel don't go blabbing on YouTube.

  • @Soapyfrogbucket i wasnt blabbing, i just wanted them to see that im not some ignorrant guy, i could be a fat guy eating a cheeseberger, i just said it so that it would be clear i didnt say it to show off, and there's nothing more retarded than saying things about yourself that aint true, u are 100 times more stupid than the guy who will believe you, and if u saw my comment i knew that some1 would react..