Added: 6 months ago
From: 8spliced
Views: 779
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (10)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • When you were ringing the front 6 at about 2:48, the second showed up badly, it sounded awful!! They are lovely as a 10 judging by this though, and why is it the older tenors which are the lightest tenors to strike C#? There is Purton's 1720s tenor at 20cwt (though it was originally more like 25cwt in all fairness!!) Tring's 18cwt Tenor from 1695, and this Tenor from 1520 in C#!!

  • @simonbellringer The 10 are lovely, the front six not so, but we had no choice; not enough bodies! The background is all 10, so they are included and sound excellent (though the second still doesn't sound quite right and never has done). The C# thing is quite interesting... must be a popular note back then!

  • @8spliced Could have rung the back 6!! They would sound lovely!! AND we wouldn't have to listen to that dodgy 2nd...

  • @simonbellringer Could have. But didn't. So tough :-P

  • @8spliced Next time!! :P

  • One my favorite rings of 10 ive rung :) also the clock has a carillon!

  • It's a correction. The way your blurb reads is that Derby Cathedral has the oldest ring of bells in the world, which is not really true...

  • These are a nice sounding 10!! Sound a lot heavier than 19cwt!!

  • Oldest ring of 10 bells in the world.

  • @irkibby Yeah, I kinda said that already... :-P

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more