Sorry Tag Heuer fans, NOT the first ever magnetic escapement, despite what they would have you believe. Hamilton used a prototype Clifford magnetic eacapement in 1939. Though this watch is dead sexy.
No, it is not perpetual. Two arc magnets in repelling mode & a balance with two arc magnets in magnetic stability with the magnets below (either attraction or repulsion) & hence causing an opposite force as each rotor arc tries to rotate over both the stator magnets & causing the rotor to reverse & stabilize - but the escapement wheel & pallet fork add energy causing destabilization of the rotor hence continuing the cycle & keeping the regulation of the balance.
@jpmac098 they didnt make it for it to preform any better than a hairspring, but mainly to revolutionize watch making like they have been for 150 years
Oh, it probably could work better - as long as the repulsion configuration is used - the neodymium magnets won't demagnetize for a 100 years, how long does a hairspring last before it loses tension - 10, 20, 50 years?
Can we all get along and stop debating Seiko vs. Tag? They're both different evolutions. Let's throw classic gyro tourbillons into the mix and we have an all out brawl on mechanical movements -.-
I still think Spring Drive is the better idea here. You may not have a Mainspring but you still have a pallet fork and balance wheel two of which were completely done away with in Spring Drive.
I also don't get the "100% mechanical" bit -- there are magnetic fields involved, no? It's a hybrid just like Spring Drive. Which is what makes both of them interesting ;)
Are you saying everything which is not electronic is mechanical? Because that's false. E.g. an atomic clock is not electronic, but it's not mechanical either -- it's regulated by nuclear fission.
As for TAG's "pendulum", electromagnetic waves require no meduim to transmit energy, hence they are not mechanical by definition. This movement is a mechanical drivetrain with an electromagnetic escapement, i.e. not "100%" mechanical. Sadly, another example of Swiss marketing BS.
First off, i clearly didn't say "everything" which is not electronic is mechanical.
Second, you clearly don't understand the difference between permanent magnetism and electromagnetism. If this were an electromagnet, it would require electricity, id est, from a battery. Obviously it doesn't use electricity to create magnetism, it uses permanent magnets to generate magnetism and is therefore completely mechanical.
I'm no fan of most of the modern Swiss stuff, but this isn't "BS".
Also, if you say that the permanent magnets in this cause this to be electronic, then every bit of matter in the universe is also electronic, as natural magnetism is what keeps atoms together and also apart.
i guess it's really hard for you to actually understand what this is about, isn't it?
But no sweat: plenty of people in this world (includiing me) who are willing to help people who lack real knowledge or simply IQ to understand these kind of stuff. So feel free to ask for help, you don't have to be ashamed! :-)
Sorry Tag Heuer fans, NOT the first ever magnetic escapement, despite what they would have you believe. Hamilton used a prototype Clifford magnetic eacapement in 1939. Though this watch is dead sexy.
weezernod 1 month ago
need price pls
QADREERIFAEE 2 months ago
I jizz my pants!! Aahhhhhh!! Wow!
Hashainderjit123 2 months ago
is it just me or I GOT TO HAVE IT!!!
Qzelafree 5 months ago
A magnet in a mechanical watch, hmmm, how smart is that.
dproffessa 6 months ago
Dear Santa
AntDX316 6 months ago
Fully mechanical and uses magnets instead of a spring? Yay, Tag Heuer invented the perpetual machine!
Thereisnosp00000n 6 months ago
I want to have sex with this commercial. IT'S SO EXQUISITE!
tafudiso 8 months ago
This is so badass
cunami4292 9 months ago
Predictable.
Nomasain 9 months ago
this guys voice is morgan freeman good.
steveometer92 10 months ago
How much is this watch?
ArrozConPollo89 10 months ago
Amazing commercial!!!
Does anyone know the song? It's fantastic!
scar00000 10 months ago
@scar00000
Facebook, then Glimpse Lab
sibanak8888 7 months ago
@sibanak8888 You my friend, have helped me discover new music!
macemaster11 7 months ago
@sibanak8888 Do you mean Glimpse Lab - Erwan Mirabeau? Where can I find more of this music?
vastila 6 months ago
@vastila
yes you're there. then you can go to "band profile" and listen to diffrent tracks. Anyway stay tuned cause something is coming..
sibanak8888 5 months ago
If magnetism oscilates the pendulum then...is the mechanism "perpetual"? Maybe I overlooked the rotor but I didn't notice one.
That would be truly revolutionary.
BigBlue0002 1 year ago
@BigBlue0002
No, it is not perpetual. Two arc magnets in repelling mode & a balance with two arc magnets in magnetic stability with the magnets below (either attraction or repulsion) & hence causing an opposite force as each rotor arc tries to rotate over both the stator magnets & causing the rotor to reverse & stabilize - but the escapement wheel & pallet fork add energy causing destabilization of the rotor hence continuing the cycle & keeping the regulation of the balance.
prodigytechus 1 year ago
is this avilable for purchase?
hellohuy 1 year ago
FAKE AND GAY
pwnzered 1 year ago
wow kakak wow
bepelovers 1 year ago
Good idead, but what happens when you get a magnet on it? It will screw it up. This works better I think with a hairspring i think.
jpmac098 1 year ago
@jpmac098 they didnt make it for it to preform any better than a hairspring, but mainly to revolutionize watch making like they have been for 150 years
rubiksfan2000 1 year ago
@rubiksfan2000 Ya I understand why they did this and yes it is awesome, but it still wouldn't work as good as a hairspring.
jpmac098 1 year ago
@jpmac098 i do agree with you, but that doesn't make me not want one =P do you know where you can even buy this?
rubiksfan2000 1 year ago
@jpmac098
Oh, it probably could work better - as long as the repulsion configuration is used - the neodymium magnets won't demagnetize for a 100 years, how long does a hairspring last before it loses tension - 10, 20, 50 years?
prodigytechus 1 year ago
Price?
dewadewa100 1 year ago
does any one know where you can buy one!?
rubiksfan2000 1 year ago
does anyone know when this will be released approx?
rubiksfan2000 1 year ago
complicated but interesting .......
TheKweed 1 year ago
I don't even care. I'd totally pay just to have that that spinning on my wrist.
smartini13 1 year ago
Forget the watch; give me that divine voice!
godchildzor 1 year ago 20
Can we all get along and stop debating Seiko vs. Tag? They're both different evolutions. Let's throw classic gyro tourbillons into the mix and we have an all out brawl on mechanical movements -.-
riceoobxg 1 year ago 2
I still think Spring Drive is the better idea here. You may not have a Mainspring but you still have a pallet fork and balance wheel two of which were completely done away with in Spring Drive.
Monito1971 1 year ago 12
I also don't get the "100% mechanical" bit -- there are magnetic fields involved, no? It's a hybrid just like Spring Drive. Which is what makes both of them interesting ;)
stfoo 1 year ago
@stfoo i think it uses permanent magnets in a mechanism
momo1tm 1 year ago
@stfoo
It's completely mechanical meaning there are no electronics. A magnet isn't electronic.
kisetsushin 1 year ago
@kisetsushin
Are you saying everything which is not electronic is mechanical? Because that's false. E.g. an atomic clock is not electronic, but it's not mechanical either -- it's regulated by nuclear fission.
As for TAG's "pendulum", electromagnetic waves require no meduim to transmit energy, hence they are not mechanical by definition. This movement is a mechanical drivetrain with an electromagnetic escapement, i.e. not "100%" mechanical. Sadly, another example of Swiss marketing BS.
stfoo 1 year ago
@stfoo
First off, i clearly didn't say "everything" which is not electronic is mechanical.
Second, you clearly don't understand the difference between permanent magnetism and electromagnetism. If this were an electromagnet, it would require electricity, id est, from a battery. Obviously it doesn't use electricity to create magnetism, it uses permanent magnets to generate magnetism and is therefore completely mechanical.
I'm no fan of most of the modern Swiss stuff, but this isn't "BS".
kisetsushin 1 year ago
@stfoo
Also, if you say that the permanent magnets in this cause this to be electronic, then every bit of matter in the universe is also electronic, as natural magnetism is what keeps atoms together and also apart.
kisetsushin 1 year ago
@stfoo
i guess it's really hard for you to actually understand what this is about, isn't it?
But no sweat: plenty of people in this world (includiing me) who are willing to help people who lack real knowledge or simply IQ to understand these kind of stuff. So feel free to ask for help, you don't have to be ashamed! :-)
catchthejackal 1 year ago 3
@Monito1971 the magnet lets you have a reverse friction which can get much more apm at much longer time
denizg6 11 months ago
@Monito1971 okay , understand that the magnets will make the watch 's wind movement run for centuries and without the need of gravity.
denizg6 11 months ago
Just an overpriced, over-glorified Seiko copy.
H3rBz92 1 year ago
@H3rBz92 If Seiko don't not care about their products, it's their problem.
Tag Heuer has a nice design and a perfect adverb for the people, while Seiko do not.
Believe me the customers don't really care who made it first, it's the thing of how you present it.
MrSuccesses 1 year ago
@MrSuccesses you are actually 100% right, but still...
TAG OWNS!
VirusTornado 1 year ago
i want this
speedpendulum 1 year ago
I want it too... I could even kill to my ex-girlfriend just for get one!!!
Yangwatanabe 1 year ago
I love the cellphone
noidentity07 1 year ago
lol i really didn't think i was going to be watching a watch commercial...but it was actually pretty cool.
whynostop 1 year ago
A work of art.
tjmann 2 years ago
Tag Heuer, innovation and invention that's what its all about, being different
charandeep1000 2 years ago 2
@charandeep1000
And using Seiko movements from time to time///
dekster14LP 2 years ago 3