Women don't have foreskins. The female prepuce, or clitoral hood, is not analogous to the male prepuce, or foreskin. Be that as it may, many women are suffered genital mutilation in varying degrees, most infamously in Africa and Asia.
As far as I am concerned there are only two excuses for genital mutilation: 1. Self-choice as an adult of free-will. 2. A condition that prevents normal functioning of said organs, such as phimosis.
Religious arguments are no excuse to torture and endanger kids.
thanks for commenting. just 2 things. The clitoral hood IS the prepuce, not only the medical term, but it's function and placement are exactly that of the male's, to cover and protect the glans.
Phimosis doesn't nec prevent normal function. See groups online of men with natural non-retractile foreskin, or true phimosis (different things) who are happy as is.
I don't care who wants to cut themself, but when this argument matters is when drs try to diagnose a healthy infant who's synechia is still intact, which is natural, and uses it as a bogus medical excuse to circumcise.
Oof, I thought I had replied to this months ago! Hmm, I knew about the function and placement part, I think I misunderstood something I read somewhere else. And for #2, I meant extreme cases where function was impaired, if they exist. My main point was to respond to needles1987's statement about women keeping their organs. Haha, maybe I like phancy words, too.
@needles1987 DAMMIT!!! I KNOW WHAT YOU MEAN AND WOMEN REALLY GOT LUCKY IN THAT WAY. I feel like men get the brunt of the harm in this society. Although I'm partial because I'm sorta of a Masculinist...the opposite of feminism.
@Jeffluvs80s those who believe women are better than men arent real feminists. feminism is about equality.
you are correct though, that often in first world countries, men get treated horribly. i even had quite a few of my highschool teachers say that boys dont have feelings, dont cry, and that its okay to harm them. wtf?
Best cognitive succinct outline of human rights ever. You would be interested in James Prescott's Origins of Violence, Patricia Robinett's Rape of Innocence, maybe join the new national Intact America or even our local BANG Bay Area iNtactivist Group (open to all, see you tube video Penis Parade)
Tasmania Law Reform Institute is now accepting opinions on male circumcision from the world that could make forced circ. illegal in Australia and impact the world. Now restoring foreskin, KOTFrank
Don't know what TLF is. Consider submitting this to Tasmania Law Reform Institute. Sometimes it is necessary to go abroad to bring results home. This is what Bill (Microsoft) and Melinda Gates Foundation is doing offering to circumcised 400,000 men and boys for $5 million in line with the WHO, UNAIDS, and PSI Population Services International (with roots in eugenics) to circ. the world and bring up circ. rates in the US. For futher info David Wilton's CircumcisionAndHIV.
Excellent! This is a very scholarly article, something that deserves to be published in something like a journal of psychology or something. You sound brilliant, smarter than most of the top physicists and world geniuses in documentaries on YouTube. Forcing mutilation on a nonconsenting person is the definition of wrong. End circumcision and help those who are already its' victims get back what was stolen from them!
In the US we say we have a right to religious freedom. I assert that such a right pertains only to the views one holds about things whch cannot otherwise be known. It does not apply to harms ones religion might induce one to inflict on others.
I think religious freedon is pretty dangerous. There really ought to be a prohibition against people using positions of authority to assert falsifiable things as truth to minors.
Pretty and smart.
johnmalory26 5 months ago
I love your cat in the back :-)
Facebookstandup 10 months ago
smart and pretty.
ps. love your pussy ;) (the cat)
fairfaerie 1 year ago
Awesome!!! 5/5!
I feel like I was raped twice in my life, Once at birth, and then by a woman at 5 years of age.
Jeffluvs80s 1 year ago 2
All women get to keep their foreskin. Why can't all men keep theirs?
needles1987 2 years ago 12
Women don't have foreskins. The female prepuce, or clitoral hood, is not analogous to the male prepuce, or foreskin. Be that as it may, many women are suffered genital mutilation in varying degrees, most infamously in Africa and Asia.
As far as I am concerned there are only two excuses for genital mutilation: 1. Self-choice as an adult of free-will. 2. A condition that prevents normal functioning of said organs, such as phimosis.
Religious arguments are no excuse to torture and endanger kids.
chupacerebro 2 years ago
thanks for commenting. just 2 things. The clitoral hood IS the prepuce, not only the medical term, but it's function and placement are exactly that of the male's, to cover and protect the glans.
Phimosis doesn't nec prevent normal function. See groups online of men with natural non-retractile foreskin, or true phimosis (different things) who are happy as is.
whatUneverknew 2 years ago
I don't care who wants to cut themself, but when this argument matters is when drs try to diagnose a healthy infant who's synechia is still intact, which is natural, and uses it as a bogus medical excuse to circumcise.
whatUneverknew 2 years ago
Oof, I thought I had replied to this months ago! Hmm, I knew about the function and placement part, I think I misunderstood something I read somewhere else. And for #2, I meant extreme cases where function was impaired, if they exist. My main point was to respond to needles1987's statement about women keeping their organs. Haha, maybe I like phancy words, too.
chupacerebro 2 years ago
phimosis does not constitute surgical intervention
JustaEropeanGuy 2 years ago 4
how do the girls masturbate then "without forskin"?
IbnNero 2 years ago
@needles1987 DAMMIT!!! I KNOW WHAT YOU MEAN AND WOMEN REALLY GOT LUCKY IN THAT WAY. I feel like men get the brunt of the harm in this society. Although I'm partial because I'm sorta of a Masculinist...the opposite of feminism.
Jeffluvs80s 1 year ago
@Jeffluvs80s those who believe women are better than men arent real feminists. feminism is about equality.
you are correct though, that often in first world countries, men get treated horribly. i even had quite a few of my highschool teachers say that boys dont have feelings, dont cry, and that its okay to harm them. wtf?
fairfaerie 1 year ago 3
Brilliant argument that you alluded to which included cutting and when applied to circumcision it is definitely a human rights violation1!!
perthfem 2 years ago 2
Best cognitive succinct outline of human rights ever. You would be interested in James Prescott's Origins of Violence, Patricia Robinett's Rape of Innocence, maybe join the new national Intact America or even our local BANG Bay Area iNtactivist Group (open to all, see you tube video Penis Parade)
Tasmania Law Reform Institute is now accepting opinions on male circumcision from the world that could make forced circ. illegal in Australia and impact the world. Now restoring foreskin, KOTFrank
kotfrank 2 years ago 4
Best Ever!? =) gosh.... THANK YOU! Thinking about submitting a version of this to TLF.
whatUneverknew 2 years ago
Don't know what TLF is. Consider submitting this to Tasmania Law Reform Institute. Sometimes it is necessary to go abroad to bring results home. This is what Bill (Microsoft) and Melinda Gates Foundation is doing offering to circumcised 400,000 men and boys for $5 million in line with the WHO, UNAIDS, and PSI Population Services International (with roots in eugenics) to circ. the world and bring up circ. rates in the US. For futher info David Wilton's CircumcisionAndHIV.
kotfrank 2 years ago
Also submit to NOCIRC if you're a student and possibly win cash prizes for paper on circumcision.
kotfrank 2 years ago
Thank you for bringing your videos to my attention! You are awesome.....
itrustbirth 2 years ago 2
Excellent! This is a very scholarly article, something that deserves to be published in something like a journal of psychology or something. You sound brilliant, smarter than most of the top physicists and world geniuses in documentaries on YouTube. Forcing mutilation on a nonconsenting person is the definition of wrong. End circumcision and help those who are already its' victims get back what was stolen from them!
YouKnowMeImJosh 2 years ago 4
Circumcision is wrong. No child under 18 should be circumcised by parents derision. That is the child's decision at 18.
HaloWarsFreak 2 years ago 7
at any age if he wants
jea740 2 years ago
In the US we say we have a right to religious freedom. I assert that such a right pertains only to the views one holds about things whch cannot otherwise be known. It does not apply to harms ones religion might induce one to inflict on others.
I think religious freedon is pretty dangerous. There really ought to be a prohibition against people using positions of authority to assert falsifiable things as truth to minors.
This would basically make Sunday School illegal.
TLCTugger 2 years ago 15
You know what's funny?
Although people are against religion even the practices within religions go against the beliefs of the actual belief system.
Basically, practices like sunday school may not even be supported biblically...
Popadibs 2 years ago