Okay at 3mins I was kinda beginning to wonder when she was going to start playing lol - I've never heard this concerto before, so I was a bit like "...come on then" :P
it would be hilarious if the camera panned down to the pages in front of the conductor and there were pictures of stick characters on HOW TO MOVE ...lol!
I never really understood why the conductor is always such a highly esteemed aspect of an orchestra. After all, the orchestra has the music in front of them, nuances and all (force, time sig, crescendos, etc. Why is he necessary? He's just waving his arms around.
After watching this, I see 2 essential functions of his role:
1.) He is a constant visual metronome that I suspect might subconsciously influence the musician's precise timing.
@oicwatudidthare You should really watch the documentary "the art of conducting." that would certainly answer your question and make you realize its vital importance in the orquestra.
@oicwatudidthare I never realized the importance of the conductor till I played with one whose movements were too vague; seriously I couldn't keep in time for shit, and it wasn't just me. He also does a load of other crap aside from that which I mostly cant remember or be bothered to type out. Either way he tends effect how the orchestra plays a lot.
My first encounter with this Chopin piece was a recording played by Van Cliburn and the Philadelphia Orchestra. The 1st movement completely defeated my will resulting in my total emotional surrender. Never had such experience before. This rendition is equally powerful. Here an Argentine pianist, a Swiss conductor, a Japanese Orchestra, and a helpless American listener all come under the spell of a Polish composer! (Cliburn won the Tchaikovsky Competition and Argerich won the Chopin Competition)
Ouch! The end of this upload is not the end of the movement. Chopin and Argerich were wonderful; and the orchestra was as wonderful at home as the Japanese are in orchestras all over the world now. But I cannot give 'WohlTemperierte' a Like for the music for how it was provided, sorry.
@thumlyly Yeah, it’s a little disappointing not being able to enjoy this beautiful 1st movement uninterrupted. But don’t blame the channel owner. YT has a limitation on the size of each upload, roughly equivalent to about 10 minutes. So the piece had to be cut in half. (Other classical music with a long movement has to go through the same knife, mind you)
Actually, I have to commend the owner for making this great performance available for us all to appreciate. Thank you!
This performance only proved the fact we know Argerich is still one of the greatest pianist for Chopin's No. 1. Good support as well by NHK Symphony Orchestra conducted by Charles Dutoit, who was married to Argerich from 1969 to 1973. Excellent.
Her art is really worderful other things are not interesting! We can speak about bad side ot Chopin'life life but his music makes peope happy and it is the only thing whic is interesting. (Sorry for my English!)
Please don't read too much into this, but I do find it interesting that both the conductor and the soloist are Western, while the orchestra is Japanese...
I have yet to see a better face/body expression. she gives me goosebumps all over my body. Even the way she appreciates the music while listening to the orchestra is stunning, such appreciation to the creator is very rare to find. I love her mouth expressions while playing...
59 people in the world are stupid enough not to love this fantastic performance. that is quite optimistic - there are lots of normal people. martha is great!!
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@hapalpaja she change the concerto stupidly. Open your eyes and your ears for Lipatti, Rubinstein, Gilels, Stefanska, Lhevinne, and you may see even Zimerman better. In my language "Martha" means "Ghosts take away".
@PianoBart958 I think it's the long grey hair for me, but she reminds me of Patti Smith. They're both wonderful artists, IMHO. Martha's technique seems, to me, to be so natural and easy, and this could be one of the reasons she's so popular while avoiding all the media hype.
@renumeratedfrog first of all, they're japanese. and second of all, this concert took place in japan. of course they're gonna use a japanese orchestra.
To be fair, I think that was probably the first thought of all 436,000 people upon first viewing this: Why is the orchestra composed of all Chinese and not black people? I know it was mine.
cuando se pensaba que con Mozart y Beethoven había culminado la música, llega este hombre, de noble figura, y desde una forma de composición única la eleva a niveles desconcidos y enaltece al piano como pocos, como el rey de los instrumentos, amo a Chopin, lo idolatro y veo en él el mayor genio del romanticismo clásico.
Actually noticed the source of a well known sequenze on "Polsat" , a polish channel by the way. It occurs at 4:30 first. Yeeah...that´s quite astonishing! I Heard this every time before they talked about the weather and found it completely wonderful, though I hated classical music former times!!
@hohohee1 LOL no, she coughed. If you listen you hear someone coughing, and I am 99% certain it is her. That's pretty funny, though - it totally looks like it.
her version of this concerto is too fast , especially around 4:35, seems her part of the piano piece is drop out of the whole structure , also her emotion of this piece is not involved well, kind the dry, she treat it too light , like a student rush out the exam , I understand she is one great pianist , but for this performance , it is not my favor thought
@cavebear2012 la bellezza della musica è proprio il fatto che un musicista puo dare la propria interpretazione alle composizioni, accostando la propria emozione a quella del compositore. a me piace come la suona, piu dell originale.
Moszkowski, Paderewski, Chopin. Me puede alguien explicar por qué los conciertos de piano de estos señores son precisamente los más románticamente sentimentales. Qué influencia tiene Polonia?
It's not Chopin's most highly rated piano piece -- for the simple reason that he didn't know how to write for an orchestra. Somehow, it seems to have translated into a subpar composition for the piano part as well. Even Liszt was a better orchestra composer.
Martha è un'ottima pianista, ma quì non c'è cuore, suona senza serenità, pare si occupi più delle espressioni facciali fingendo impeto etrasporto che del suono. Mi dispiace, preferisco altre interpretazioni, troppo rivolta a muovere le dita.
@lohengrin63 in parte concordo e' un'esecuzione impeccabile ma qui e' il limite ,tuttavia non manca di emozionare e inoltre il suono e' perfetto .nella versione di yundi li se ascolti bene il suo suono e' piu' faticoso e costruito .se devo scegliere preferisco senz'altro la purezza sonora.
One can tell that she isn't trying to show off technique like many other pianists, but concentrate of musical phrasing. She's never moved me until now. I understand she was on winner's row in a Chopin Competition a long time ago.
@SandyElm Horovitz was one of greatest pianist of XX. but Martha A. is very very good pianist. She plays w Shotakovich and Bartok as well. I do not but I think she has wider repetory.
@edusomniator Yo no considero que uno sea mejor o peor que el otro, cada uno es interprete a su manera.. No es cuestion de que porque yo sea argentino voy a decir que Martha es la mejor pianista del mundo, sola por esa tonta razon.. No estoy de acuerdo que diga "la mejor pianista del mundo... argentina tenia que ser!" por mas argentina, chilena, peruana o de donde fuese.. Es ignorante pensar eso.. Los dos son excelentes pianistas (Claudio era) y no son comparables y punto.
@geri002 Geri, al terminar tu comentario con un "y punto", habla muy mal de ti, como si no supieras conversar. Si te digo que Claudio es mejor que Marta, pues investiga (Claudio y Horowits son considerados los mejores pianistas del siglo XX). La misma Marta lo confirma cuando dice que Arrau dejó la vara muy alta para los pianistas intérpretes de Bethoven. Y no lo digo sólo porque es chileno, lo digo con base hay hay un mostón de respaldo en internet que no me alcanza decir en un comentario
@edusomniator No quiero discutir porque no me gusta, pero creo que es de una persona modesta decir eso, y jamas dije que Arrau sea mejor o peor que Martha, solamente digo que no son comparables. Y con respecto a lo de Beethoven, Martha es famosa por sus interpretaciones de Bach, Ravel y Chopin, entre otros, no Beethoven. Que tampoco digo que sea mala interprete de Beethoven, pero simplemente, no comparo. No son cosas comparables.
@edusomniator Horowitz es el mejor pianista de su casa, porque fuera de ella no da pié con bola. Tiene la fama que le ha concedido su mediocre forma de tocar. Ya sabemos que lo mediocre gusta a los mediocres, y de mediocres está el mundo lleno. Tiene las manos de chocolate.
De Claudio Arrau opino mejor que de Horowitz, pero tampoco puedo olvidar el festival de fallos técnicos y errores en los que su música sumerge.
@142ESTEBAN I agree! Although I play the violin, I cannot resist be listening to her! She is unique. The new talent after Martha Argerich is Yilianna Avdeeva. Listen to her to the same music piece and you'll see!
She is great technical, but I don't feel that much emotion in it. But of course it's my private point of view. Maybe Chopin would perceive it as excellent performance ;)
The violin soloist looks like he stepped right off the set of the Lawrence Welk Show, and the conductor reminds me of my drunk uncle at a family reunion. Great piece though! Now back to the serious, critiquing conversation already in progress...
È un dato di fatto; chiunque sia disposto a sostenere il contrario è un perfetto imbecille! E oltretutto non mi riferisco solo a questo concerto, ma a un po tutto il suo (orribile) repertorio. Di tutto quello che ha registrato e suonato in concerto, c'è davvero poco, di buono (sia come esecuzione che come repertorio).
Vorrei davvero sapere dove trovate il coraggio di dire che questa è una buona esecuzione! Fa schifo! La Argerich non sa assolutamente cosa vuol dire TEMPO e RITMO! Cambia tempo a piacimeto praticamente a ogni battuta e anche la dinamica è fuori luogo per questo concerto la cui musica è così fragile. Martha Argerich è solo un grande nome, ma dietro a questo di nasconde una donna senza senso della misura e dell'interpretazione.
Great Argerich...!!!!!!!
KAPNIZW 10 hours ago
little Martha :) God bless you!
1waka1waka1 2 weeks ago in playlist martha argerich
mamma argerich
onaga2021 2 weeks ago
TOO FAST
6:16-6:24
Valmanway9 1 month ago
@Valmanway9 Who cares?
dennis0mus 1 month ago
i prefer this one to hers:
watch?v=O6AAOkgTeHA
pianosig 1 month ago in playlist Chopin
luuuve
phomar95 2 months ago
She had an affair with the conductor. And then they were married.
bonmom 2 months ago
Comment removed
bonmom 2 months ago
Pure virtuosity, undiluted musicality !
For those nay-sayers, though she plays with extreme passion and fury, she is never quite unbridled, and has great musical sensibility.
lamorlayefrance 2 months ago
A real pleasure to listen to Martha Argerich.Part 4/4 is WONDERFUL....
I shall never forget it.......
74lou74 2 months ago
Lmfao Martha is bored the whole time the orchestra is playing!
whitechocolateex 3 months ago
@whitechocolateex that is why i hate her.
Erikk91 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
love this!
40606512 3 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
She has to learn, learn, and on more time learn.....from Gilels
musiccritic1910 4 months ago
Okay at 3mins I was kinda beginning to wonder when she was going to start playing lol - I've never heard this concerto before, so I was a bit like "...come on then" :P
But it was SO worth the wait! Wow.
alexxshaw42 4 months ago 6
Thank you!
She is a goddess in the pantheon of pianists, oh God how much I love her...
Adorado31 4 months ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
Best part: 1:25-1:32 :)
charlesdarwin55 4 months ago
Comment removed
charlesdarwin55 4 months ago
amazing talent and personality
gabriella60730 5 months ago
look at her streching and moving, such anxiety.
TheRightNeutrino 5 months ago
it would be hilarious if the camera panned down to the pages in front of the conductor and there were pictures of stick characters on HOW TO MOVE ...lol!
DICACIO1 6 months ago in playlist Martha Chopin 3
Big favorite! Beautiful presentation! Thank you! Petlánovics József
QP1M4U3K7B 6 months ago
Big favorite! Beautiful presentation! Thank you!
QP1M4U3K7B 6 months ago
I never really understood why the conductor is always such a highly esteemed aspect of an orchestra. After all, the orchestra has the music in front of them, nuances and all (force, time sig, crescendos, etc. Why is he necessary? He's just waving his arms around.
After watching this, I see 2 essential functions of his role:
1.) He is a constant visual metronome that I suspect might subconsciously influence the musician's precise timing.
2.) I don't remember what two was. [8]
oicwatudidthare 6 months ago 2
@oicwatudidthare You should really watch the documentary "the art of conducting." that would certainly answer your question and make you realize its vital importance in the orquestra.
p0rel 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@p0rel I will put it on my To Watch list :]
oicwatudidthare 6 months ago
@oicwatudidthare I never realized the importance of the conductor till I played with one whose movements were too vague; seriously I couldn't keep in time for shit, and it wasn't just me. He also does a load of other crap aside from that which I mostly cant remember or be bothered to type out. Either way he tends effect how the orchestra plays a lot.
RH98 6 months ago
@RH98
I think the conductor's movements are noticed from the corner of your eye while playing. I bet there's some strong truth in this.
oicwatudidthare 6 months ago
thank you martha
2moonsandocean 7 months ago
My first encounter with this Chopin piece was a recording played by Van Cliburn and the Philadelphia Orchestra. The 1st movement completely defeated my will resulting in my total emotional surrender. Never had such experience before. This rendition is equally powerful. Here an Argentine pianist, a Swiss conductor, a Japanese Orchestra, and a helpless American listener all come under the spell of a Polish composer! (Cliburn won the Tchaikovsky Competition and Argerich won the Chopin Competition)
BeztMuzic 7 months ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
The part from 6:31 to 6:47 made me cry :')
C0nstellati0ns 7 months ago
Comment removed
C0nstellati0ns 7 months ago
That Woman is so beautiful !!!
jorgeoscar1000 7 months ago 2
Девочка просто поцелованная Богом!! игра божественная! рояль поет и рассыпается искрами бисерных пассажей!! Марту обожаю!!!
Kseniya7755 7 months ago
Ouch! The end of this upload is not the end of the movement. Chopin and Argerich were wonderful; and the orchestra was as wonderful at home as the Japanese are in orchestras all over the world now. But I cannot give 'WohlTemperierte' a Like for the music for how it was provided, sorry.
thumlyly 7 months ago
@thumlyly Yeah, it’s a little disappointing not being able to enjoy this beautiful 1st movement uninterrupted. But don’t blame the channel owner. YT has a limitation on the size of each upload, roughly equivalent to about 10 minutes. So the piece had to be cut in half. (Other classical music with a long movement has to go through the same knife, mind you)
Actually, I have to commend the owner for making this great performance available for us all to appreciate. Thank you!
BeztMuzic 7 months ago
I wonder how many of these 558,601 views are me...
chrismanners1 7 months ago 7
romance....
khadra20 7 months ago
This performance only proved the fact we know Argerich is still one of the greatest pianist for Chopin's No. 1. Good support as well by NHK Symphony Orchestra conducted by Charles Dutoit, who was married to Argerich from 1969 to 1973. Excellent.
kenkengotanda 8 months ago
Her music is really worderful other things are not interesting!
1927edith 7 months ago
Her art is really worderful other things are not interesting! We can speak about bad side ot Chopin'life life but his music makes peope happy and it is the only thing whic is interesting. (Sorry for my English!)
1927edith 7 months ago
34 people suffer from clogged ears.
ravelismyhubby91 8 months ago 18
@ravelismyhubby91 now are 35 haha XD
ssakuindy 2 months ago
@designerpm: he is charles dutoit, her ex husband.
MadamePingPing 9 months ago
@MadamePingPing Does she have now a husband?
DadoD999 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Conductor is Charles Dutoit, former conductor of the Montreal Symphony, currently at the Philedelphia Orchestra. Conducted in Japan for some years.
AllysonsViolinStudio 9 months ago
Comment removed
AllysonsViolinStudio 9 months ago
She's so beatiful!!!
jorgeoscar1000 9 months ago
Awesome! TY wohl for posting.
paulostroff99 9 months ago
Guest Conductor... looks like Charles Dutoit.
designerplaymate 9 months ago
Please don't read too much into this, but I do find it interesting that both the conductor and the soloist are Western, while the orchestra is Japanese...
renumeratedfrog 10 months ago
@renumeratedfrog It isn't strange for orchestras from all over the world to invite conductors and performers from other continents.
elguanteloko 8 months ago
What a beautiful woman she is
jorgeoscar1000 10 months ago 2
merveilleuse, sublime musicienne!!!!!!!!!!merci Martha
argentor16 10 months ago
its too bad the recording of this performance is total rubbish.
AlcoholLevel 11 months ago
@AlcoholLevel -Have another drink. lol
paulostroff99 9 months ago 4
I have yet to see a better face/body expression. she gives me goosebumps all over my body. Even the way she appreciates the music while listening to the orchestra is stunning, such appreciation to the creator is very rare to find. I love her mouth expressions while playing...
trendykurdos 11 months ago
vagmerteb am qals!!!!!!!!!! adorable playing!
nikoloza777 11 months ago
59 people in the world are stupid enough not to love this fantastic performance. that is quite optimistic - there are lots of normal people. martha is great!!
hapalpaja 11 months ago
@hapalpaja 29:-)
hapalpaja 11 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@hapalpaja she change the concerto stupidly. Open your eyes and your ears for Lipatti, Rubinstein, Gilels, Stefanska, Lhevinne, and you may see even Zimerman better. In my language "Martha" means "Ghosts take away".
jasquilaria 10 months ago
Martha Argerich... I love you!!
Agrichfan 11 months ago 60
Chi sono i 29 cretini che hanno messo non mi piace?
pierpi979 11 months ago
tall pants the conducter sure has!
RokakuT 1 year ago
Does she use the edition by Ignaz Friedman?
ChenChiuYu 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Amazing, beautiful, wonderful a both, orchestra and Martha the elegance is there. well doneeeeeeeee!!! the best, she is winner
Paulland30 hace 1 día
Paulland30 1 year ago
Comment removed
Paulland30 1 year ago
I watched 6 different pianists play this piece, I still think Yundi Li is the best
leoangli 1 year ago
The best version of this concerto is a cheap CD i bought at a supermarket. Played by Dubravka Tomsic and the Ljubljana Orchestra. Not kidding.
foodmore 1 year ago
WAY TOO FAST IMO. Yundi li plays it best for this piece
blahblahblahunited 1 year ago
Absolutely Beautiful! So strong and yet so vulnerable. Love it and her!
Orchestra sounds great too!
petero303 1 year ago
A 4 minute introduction...geesh.
Kaggypants 1 year ago
Martha reminds me of meryl streep for some reason :P
PianoBart958 1 year ago
@PianoBart958 I think it's the long grey hair for me, but she reminds me of Patti Smith. They're both wonderful artists, IMHO. Martha's technique seems, to me, to be so natural and easy, and this could be one of the reasons she's so popular while avoiding all the media hype.
bckm54 9 months ago
Argerich, genial como siempre. concierto sublime
carlosLor 1 year ago
Want's sure that I'd like Argerich playing this piece... Boy was I ever wrong!!! BRAVO!!
trschaefer 1 year ago
She is really gorgeous, and she looks like susan sontag
giraffepig2047 1 year ago
Muy rápido!!!! :(
zetangie 1 year ago
who is conducting?
Bon0 1 year ago
@Bon0 Charles Dutoit, her ex-husband (1969-73)
davidnovotnypiano 1 year ago
impresionante!!!!!!solo hay una persona que pueda tocar asi:Martha Argerich
mrss0l3 1 year ago
She is an exciting presence. Blazing skill and wonderful humanity.
sonozoltan 1 year ago
Too sharp around the edges for this sublime sonata - but this is par for Argerich. Contrast Rubinstein's touch and phrasing.
lourak 1 year ago
awww so romantic from 4:31
BassicStorm 1 year ago
she play piano since a long time ago.i hope there are more than 100 milion people watch this video.
lewischin2000 1 year ago
Why are there always so many Chinese people in the orchestra, but not Blacks?
renumeratedfrog 1 year ago
@renumeratedfrog first of all, they're japanese. and second of all, this concert took place in japan. of course they're gonna use a japanese orchestra.
purplefreak137 1 year ago
@purplefreak137
To be fair, I think that was probably the first thought of all 436,000 people upon first viewing this: Why is the orchestra composed of all Chinese and not black people? I know it was mine.
borjon23 1 year ago
The conductor reminds of John Cleese, for some reason... :P
renumeratedfrog 1 year ago 35
...I thought the late Keith Floyd......
thefugue48 1 year ago
@renumeratedfrog Yeah he does!! You're so right, just like in A fish called Wanda :D
BinaVicky 1 year ago
@BinaVicky Haha, exactly... Barrister Archie Leach.
renumeratedfrog 1 year ago
@renumeratedfrog I adore Archie!! :D
BinaVicky 1 year ago
@renumeratedfrog Yeah same :P I took a double take when I looked at him :P
BaboonBassoon 10 months ago
@renumeratedfrog The only way he could be more like John Cleese is if he actually was John Cleese. (This performance... not in general)
RH98 6 months ago
@renumeratedfrog haha now that you've mentioned it! It's John Cleese's haircut and motions (watch 2:52 for instance)
fresswolf 4 months ago
@renumeratedfrog looks nothin like him imho
pentiumradeon 4 months ago
@renumeratedfrog Michael Palin also
mrpolaroid123 3 months ago
Creo sinceramente que esta interpretado demasiado rápido. No me transmite tanto como Zimerman...
Khrados 1 year ago
At 0:32 ... the kiss ? of the true love.........
MrJianghanchao 1 year ago
cuando se pensaba que con Mozart y Beethoven había culminado la música, llega este hombre, de noble figura, y desde una forma de composición única la eleva a niveles desconcidos y enaltece al piano como pocos, como el rey de los instrumentos, amo a Chopin, lo idolatro y veo en él el mayor genio del romanticismo clásico.
tavo1239 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
阿格麗希 啥時候的演奏?
啥樂團? 阿巴多指揮?
3q
200800714 1 year ago
阿格麗希 啥時候的演奏?
啥樂團? 阿巴多指揮?
200800714 1 year ago
@200800714 1996 in Japan, and i think that's Charles Dutoit, so possibly the orch was Montreal or LSO?
hopuiyin12 1 year ago
@200800714 1996 in Japan, and i think that's Charles Dutoit, and most of the players look Asian, so I think it's a Japanese orch
hopuiyin12 1 year ago
@hopuiyin12 you're right it's Dutoit and I'm pretty sure that's the NHK Symphony (orch of Japanese national broadcasting corp.)
kundalini76 1 year ago
Actually noticed the source of a well known sequenze on "Polsat" , a polish channel by the way. It occurs at 4:30 first. Yeeah...that´s quite astonishing! I Heard this every time before they talked about the weather and found it completely wonderful, though I hated classical music former times!!
Loving you Martha!!!
Hicksbosone 1 year ago
1:45 it's like she's pretend playing with the orchestra or something... lol
mmoynan 1 year ago
DID SHE LICK HER HAND AT 0:07 ish - 0:09
hohohee1 1 year ago
@hohohee1 LOL no, she coughed. If you listen you hear someone coughing, and I am 99% certain it is her. That's pretty funny, though - it totally looks like it.
mmoynan 1 year ago
@hohohee1 no i think she was rubbing her nose.
pitabread12 1 year ago
she plays better than before she was much more younger.
even that genius talent improves!
pianoevah 1 year ago
She's a gorgeuos and talented woman !!
jorgeoscar1000 1 year ago
It was actually 14 years ago.and look how gorgeous she looks.
and its so cute when she grooms her hair and nibs her finger at the beginning.
by the way, this is a really nice piece and her expressiveness made this whole piece sound even more amazing than before.
edmondrachmaninov 1 year ago
her version of this concerto is too fast , especially around 4:35, seems her part of the piano piece is drop out of the whole structure , also her emotion of this piece is not involved well, kind the dry, she treat it too light , like a student rush out the exam , I understand she is one great pianist , but for this performance , it is not my favor thought
cavebear2012 1 year ago
@cavebear2012 la bellezza della musica è proprio il fatto che un musicista puo dare la propria interpretazione alle composizioni, accostando la propria emozione a quella del compositore. a me piace come la suona, piu dell originale.
piepiepiepiepiepieok 1 year ago
@piepiepiepiepiepieok Temo che se non traduci la persona a cui parli non capirà nulla.
SirGlennGould 1 year ago
@SirGlennGould gloogle translator è gratis :)
piepiepiepiepiepieok 1 year ago
@piepiepiepiepiepieok Si ma il recipiente come fà a sapere che gli stai parlando in Italiano ? XD
SirGlennGould 1 year ago
@SirGlennGould e io come faccio a capire che è inglese? XD
piepiepiepiepiepieok 1 year ago
to be frank, im annoyed that i there is 4 minutes before hearing the piano.
musicandminastirith 1 year ago
@musicandminastirith You have to complain to Chopin
ursin1 1 year ago
from 4:32 to 4:45 is one of the most emotional peaces of the history of classical. It is very sample, but it make me cry every time i listen to it
piepiepiepiepiepieok 1 year ago
@piepiepiepiepiepieok - i totally agree
stopp20042005 1 year ago
Comment removed
piepiepiepiepiepieok 1 year ago
That's so magig, so powerful! Exceptionnal
CharlesHenriEdouard 1 year ago
Moszkowski, Paderewski, Chopin. Me puede alguien explicar por qué los conciertos de piano de estos señores son precisamente los más románticamente sentimentales. Qué influencia tiene Polonia?
1944fernando 1 year ago
The Claudio Arrau version is my prefered. Martha, as usual, plays it too QUICKLY !
But what a technic skill ! She terrifies the competition, for sure !
enguerranddemarigny 1 year ago
She's like: "Oh God, i'm boring, boooring B-O-R-I-N-G... Oh what a nice roof... Yes, now my turn"
NieMachoMan 1 year ago
@NieMachoMan but you have to admit the FOUR MINUTES of orchestra before the piano entrance is like not even needed
i really don't like this piece lol -_-
gjwr 1 year ago
It's not Chopin's most highly rated piano piece -- for the simple reason that he didn't know how to write for an orchestra. Somehow, it seems to have translated into a subpar composition for the piano part as well. Even Liszt was a better orchestra composer.
twistoph 1 year ago
very fast tempo i didnt like it lack of emotion yundi li is far better
vbatuhan 1 year ago
im not a fan of argerichs chopin interpretations and also this one isnt in my type. but she is of course one of the greatests living pianists.
mx19idlewilder 1 year ago
Martha è un'ottima pianista, ma quì non c'è cuore, suona senza serenità, pare si occupi più delle espressioni facciali fingendo impeto etrasporto che del suono. Mi dispiace, preferisco altre interpretazioni, troppo rivolta a muovere le dita.
lohengrin63 1 year ago
@lohengrin63 in parte concordo e' un'esecuzione impeccabile ma qui e' il limite ,tuttavia non manca di emozionare e inoltre il suono e' perfetto .nella versione di yundi li se ascolti bene il suo suono e' piu' faticoso e costruito .se devo scegliere preferisco senz'altro la purezza sonora.
71lupenzo710 1 year ago
is it the orchestra that sounds so bad? or just chopin's infamously poor orchestral skills?
MrEnglishmath 1 year ago
@MrEnglishmath actually the orchestra part for this is dreadful i was really surprised at first as well -_-
gjwr 1 year ago
It's not that surprising: simply put, Chopin didn't know how to write for an orchestra (like, say, Mozart, Beethoven, or Brahms).
twistoph 1 year ago
For all of you who want to skip the horribly suckass orchestral intro, the pianist begins at 4:05. Unbelievably worthless orchestra, like vapor.
Argerich on the other hand is a beautiful poetess. Thank God for her!!!!!!!!!!
buxter 1 year ago
One can tell that she isn't trying to show off technique like many other pianists, but concentrate of musical phrasing. She's never moved me until now. I understand she was on winner's row in a Chopin Competition a long time ago.
freeqwerqwer 1 year ago 9
she makes a funny face at 0:32
btai3 1 year ago
horowitz! the best!!!!!!!!!!!!
SandyElm 1 year ago
@SandyElm Horowitz never recorded this. Did he?
th3wing3dpaint3r 1 year ago
@SandyElm Horovitz was one of greatest pianist of XX. but Martha A. is very very good pianist. She plays w Shotakovich and Bartok as well. I do not but I think she has wider repetory.
1927edith 1 year ago
@SandyElm
1927edith 1 year ago
so amazing!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Tasiknia 1 year ago
GLORIOSA MARTHA, TE AMO!!!!!!!!!
edukonga 1 year ago
4:36 - 5:05 khiến tôi quá xúc động!
musiclover1485 1 year ago
The orchestra sound too boring and when Martha starts playing you completely forgot that there's an orchestra behind her. Long live Martha Argerich.
P.S. I have a DG vinyl with her and Nicolas Economou playing the Symphonic Dances (Rachmaninov) and The Nutcracker (Tchaikovsky)... BEAUTIFUL.
qhubbles 1 year ago
I have a recording of this concert (and many more) played by Marta Argerich!
It's so beautiful!
ivanpasa 1 year ago
you can def. hear how Chopin was inspired by Mozart in his concertos
RemovdSande11 1 year ago
The incredible Martha . Incomparable !
esclarmonde1 1 year ago
la mejor pianista del mundo... argentina tenia que ser!
142ESTEBAN 1 year ago 14
@142ESTEBAN te equivocas, al chileno Claudio Arrau no le llega ni a los talones ;)
edusomniator 1 year ago
@edusomniator Yo no considero que uno sea mejor o peor que el otro, cada uno es interprete a su manera.. No es cuestion de que porque yo sea argentino voy a decir que Martha es la mejor pianista del mundo, sola por esa tonta razon.. No estoy de acuerdo que diga "la mejor pianista del mundo... argentina tenia que ser!" por mas argentina, chilena, peruana o de donde fuese.. Es ignorante pensar eso.. Los dos son excelentes pianistas (Claudio era) y no son comparables y punto.
geri002 1 year ago
@geri002 Geri, al terminar tu comentario con un "y punto", habla muy mal de ti, como si no supieras conversar. Si te digo que Claudio es mejor que Marta, pues investiga (Claudio y Horowits son considerados los mejores pianistas del siglo XX). La misma Marta lo confirma cuando dice que Arrau dejó la vara muy alta para los pianistas intérpretes de Bethoven. Y no lo digo sólo porque es chileno, lo digo con base hay hay un mostón de respaldo en internet que no me alcanza decir en un comentario
edusomniator 1 year ago
@edusomniator No quiero discutir porque no me gusta, pero creo que es de una persona modesta decir eso, y jamas dije que Arrau sea mejor o peor que Martha, solamente digo que no son comparables. Y con respecto a lo de Beethoven, Martha es famosa por sus interpretaciones de Bach, Ravel y Chopin, entre otros, no Beethoven. Que tampoco digo que sea mala interprete de Beethoven, pero simplemente, no comparo. No son cosas comparables.
geri002 1 year ago
@edusomniator Horowitz es el mejor pianista de su casa, porque fuera de ella no da pié con bola. Tiene la fama que le ha concedido su mediocre forma de tocar. Ya sabemos que lo mediocre gusta a los mediocres, y de mediocres está el mundo lleno. Tiene las manos de chocolate.
De Claudio Arrau opino mejor que de Horowitz, pero tampoco puedo olvidar el festival de fallos técnicos y errores en los que su música sumerge.
rolldito 1 year ago
@142ESTEBAN Ya empezamos con los nacionalismos! Y las mujeres dirán: Mujer tenía que ser! Mejor comentemos con raciocinio.
rolldito 1 year ago
@rolldito ARGENTINA TENIA QUE SER!!!... UNA DE LAS POCAS COSAS EN QUE LOS ARGENTINOS NOS DESTACAMOS, POR FAVOR DEJAME HACER UN COMENTARIO ASI!!
142ESTEBAN 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@rolldito ARGENTINA TENIA QUE SER!!!... UNA DE LAS POCAS COSAS EN QUE LOS ARGENTINOS NOS DESTACAMOS, POR FAVOR DEJAME HACER UN COMENTARIO ASI!!
142ESTEBAN 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@rolldito ARGENTINA TENIA QUE SER!!!... UNA DE LAS POCAS COSAS EN QUE LOS ARGENTINOS NOS DESTACAMOS, POR FAVOR DÉJAME HACER UN COMENTARIO ASI!!
142ESTEBAN 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@rolldito ARGENTINA TENIA QUE SER!!!... UNA DE LAS POCAS COSAS EN QUE LOS ARGENTINOS NOS DESTACAMOS, POR FAVOR DÉJAME HACER UN COMENTARIO ASI!!
142ESTEBAN 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@rolldito ARGENTINA TENIA QUE SER!!!... UNA DE LAS POCAS COSAS EN QUE LOS ARGENTINOS NOS DESTACAMOS, POR FAVOR DÉJAME HACER UN COMENTARIO ASI!!
142ESTEBAN 1 year ago
@142ESTEBAN Ella es tan perfecta pero como semi dios que es, algun defecto debria tener
iurena 1 year ago
@142ESTEBAN I agree! Although I play the violin, I cannot resist be listening to her! She is unique. The new talent after Martha Argerich is Yilianna Avdeeva. Listen to her to the same music piece and you'll see!
gbettina 1 year ago
@142ESTEBAN Señor, sí señor !!!
La mejor del mundo, como bien lo ha dicho.-
Afectuosamente: Carlos (Argentina)
cdcattaneo 1 year ago
this is not her best performance..
mrchopin89 1 year ago
that was great! AND her hands in the reflection of her piano look like the hand from the addams family :-D
kovyiscool 1 year ago
Chopin is the greastest and Martha rocks my boat. Good stuf!
Countrychiddler 1 year ago
She is great technical, but I don't feel that much emotion in it. But of course it's my private point of view. Maybe Chopin would perceive it as excellent performance ;)
angelalewis25 1 year ago
The violin soloist looks like he stepped right off the set of the Lawrence Welk Show, and the conductor reminds me of my drunk uncle at a family reunion. Great piece though! Now back to the serious, critiquing conversation already in progress...
LetMyPeopleThink 1 year ago
@LetMyPeopleThink FYI, the conductor is Dutoit, who was Argerich's second husband.
jcwk87 1 year ago
This music is art work, thats all I know.
randyclar747 1 year ago
bravissima
flashingluce 1 year ago
È un dato di fatto; chiunque sia disposto a sostenere il contrario è un perfetto imbecille! E oltretutto non mi riferisco solo a questo concerto, ma a un po tutto il suo (orribile) repertorio. Di tutto quello che ha registrato e suonato in concerto, c'è davvero poco, di buono (sia come esecuzione che come repertorio).
Darrning 1 year ago
Comment removed
marzio54 1 year ago
Vorrei davvero sapere dove trovate il coraggio di dire che questa è una buona esecuzione! Fa schifo! La Argerich non sa assolutamente cosa vuol dire TEMPO e RITMO! Cambia tempo a piacimeto praticamente a ogni battuta e anche la dinamica è fuori luogo per questo concerto la cui musica è così fragile. Martha Argerich è solo un grande nome, ma dietro a questo di nasconde una donna senza senso della misura e dell'interpretazione.