Hallo Magnus , not only your letter to FIDE in November 2010 shows that you are not any longer the best chessplayer , since November 2010 Viswanthan is also again the chessplayer with the highest rating. Try to beat my worldrecord with mate in 550 here on youtube if you can ... kindly regards from Karlsruhe , Germany
Hallo Magnus , not only your letter to FIDE in November 2010 shows that you are not any longer the best chessplayer , since November 2010 Viswanthan is also again the chessplayer with the highest rating. Try to beat my worldrecord with mate in 550 here on youtube if you can ... kindly regards from Karlsruhe , Germany
Hallo Magnus , not only your letter to FIDE in November 2010 shows that you are not any longer the best chessplayer , since November 2010 Viswanthan is also again the chessplayer with the highest rating. Try to beat my worldrecord with mate in 550 here on youtube if you can ... kindly regards from Karlsruhe , Germany
Hallo Magnus , not only your letter to FIDE in November 2010 shows that you are not any longer the best chessplayer , since November 2010 Viswanthan is also again the chessplayer with the highest rating. Try to beat my worldrecord with mate in 550 here on youtube if you can ... kindly regards from Karlsruhe , Germany
Magnus didnt beat the WORLD, he beats ONLY 3 GM with over 100 elo less than Magnus. Against the WORLD with the normal PC-Hardware and Stockfish 1.8 - or better Rybka-4-Software at home Magnus cant win and he knows this and the WORLD knows that his BOXING-show was only a DECEPTION. He said in this clip : Can YOU beat me
Hello Magnus , you didnt beat the - WORLD - you beat - ONLY 3 GM - with over 100 elo less than you have. Against the WORLD with the normal PC-Hardware and Stockfish 1.8 - or better Rybka-4-Software at home you cant win. The WORLD knows that your BOXING-show was only a DECEPTION. You say in your clip : Can YOU beat me
Hello Magnus , you didnt beat the - WORLD - you beat - ONLY 3 GM - with over 100 elo less than you have. Against the WORLD with the normal PC-Hardware and Stockfish 1.8 - or better Rybka-4-Software at home you cant win. The WORLD knows that your BOXING-show was only a DECEPTION. You say in your clip : Can YOU beat me
In the past our teachers were always the grandmasters and worldchampions, nowadays our teachers are the computers. They play , solve and compose . So have a look at youtube.com :
Kasparov was a great player. None can deny it. But one never forget the immense soviet support system that was constantly at his disposal. Counsel from the best players in the world - including the personal attention of Botvinnik was no small advantage in Kasparov's development.
@logant44 Actually the Soviet school favored Karpov and tried to hold back Kasparov in favor of him, Kasparov had to prove he was the best anyway without their support.
Alekhine was amazing, the greatest genius chess player ever. Alekhine is more than a chess player, he s a monster human. Alekhine had a prodigious memory. He spoke almost perfect new foreign languages, played in his legendary career around 50,000 serious parties. A record not dream Karpov, Kasparov, Fischer and many others together. Alekhine knew by heart all parties played the tournament 15 years ago the masters and those played 100 years ago the great masters.
@mosu10 alekhine was a no life he study average 12 horus of chess per day. this guy was complety absorb by the game and he is the only wc to died with his title and a bank deposit of 3$
@theprez98 and now his 2813... and has current live rating of 2824,1 with just to more game to plays ( white and black ) and it the last tournament before the fide list of July. Carlsen is a beast
Are you kidding me? Carlsen in the World Open. He will go 9-0 with his eyes closed. A few years ago, Ivanchuk played in the New York Open and won every game and never used more than 45 minutes in any of his games.
Fischer is the greatest GM ever. When someone wins 19 straight games against GMs then we'll start making comparisons. Fischer in his prime would demolish Kasparov(whom I idolize), Karpov, Kramnik, Anand, and the rest of 'em. Fischer left the game to early otherwise he would have proven me right. He became a loon, but his chess was brilliant, and noone can take that from him.
This has got to be a joke? 19 Straight games is great, take a look at Kasparov's personal record against the top players, he has a combined score of 42-0 against Shirov, Gelfand & Bareev!! Not including draws...
well this isn't worth debating, i may have exaggerated a bit but you can't deny fischer's greatness. at the very least he's kasparov's equal, and had they met on the board it would've been a great battle.
GM Wesley So, the upcoming chess star will beat magnus carlsen one of this days,gm so is just turned 15 and is 2641 elo rating, even higher than kasparov,fischer,carlsen,radjabov and karjakin when they turned 15
Rating is not the most accurate guage, Karpov, for example has never been particularly good in his rating, but the Russian is world champion for 10 years. And dont compare Wesley to Fischer, there can never be another of him. US Champion at the age of 14, less than 10 years later he's said to be the best in the world, at 29 he rampaged his way to the World Champion title after beating Spassky 7-3 with 11 draws. 3 years later he disappeared from the chess world... (and reappeared 20 years later)
According to the FIDE website, Carlsen is No. 4 as of March 21 2009. He is only 20 points below Topalev, though. Which means he'll probably be No. 1 very soon.
He is the highest rated teenager ever, better than even Fischer or Kasparov.
I believe gabisubis is speaking about rating inflation. For example, if Fischer's peak strength in 1972 could be preserved and he played at that clip currently, his rating would easily exceed 2800
Well, the rating is based on the number of victories against opponents whose rating is known.
Fischer beat his opponents x number of times, hence his rating. You may be right, but I'm not so sure. It's not the number of opponents you play that matters. It's the number of victories against them. Players today don't necessarily play more games per year than before. Kramnik & co play 20-30 games/year, not 300.
you can't compare carlsen to fisher. it's a different era. fisher did his own analysis without computers and teams of seconds like carlsen. even nakamura is easily carlsen's equal.
Rating inflation is due to a greater number of players. This introduces a higher total of points to go around, especially to the top guys. With one level feeding off the one below it, guys ascend to new heights but then level off as they play the other top 15 guys or so.
Btw, Fischer achieved the status of Grandmaster at a younger age than Carlsen. To this day, he is the youngest championship candidate EVER. Carlsen is a talent for sure, but he has some ways to go to catch Fischer.
Carlsen achieved the title of GM at 13 years and 4 months old, while Fischer was 15 years and 6 months old. As for championship candidate, it doesn't matter as Fischer did not win until he was 27.
Players get better ratings faster nowadays but they aren't as experienced as grandmasters of the past. Fischer was an unrivaled talent in his day. He was a grandmaster when then next youngest grandmaster Boris Spassky was 6 years older. It does matter that Fischer was a champ candidate, he could've won without soviet interference before 1972. When Carlsen wins it all, get back to me.
It's not a stretch. Carlsen protects his rating by playing in category 18 or above round robins. Nakamura plays in opens and plays more against improving players so that they are stronger than their rating would suggest, so his rating takes a hit with draws and losses. Nakamura has no fear, and I suspect he doesn't worry about ratings that much. I want to see Carlsen play in the World Open or something similar and see what happens to his precious rating.
Are you ranked higher than him in the FIDE rating system ? If not, then I don't need to know who you are to know you probably can't beat him at chess.
After the game is over, the two players talk to each other and move the pieces around and make moves that did not actually happen in the game. Sort of like "alternate endings" to a movie. Each player wants to see what the other player was thinking, or see if he has better moves than he actually played in the game.
Kramnik is a beast but carlsen has some talent too:$
TheDanRauch 6 months ago
The analyse was in the Corus 2007 in Wijk-aan-Zee (NL)
FabriceWantiez 1 year ago
where is the analye?
solinero 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hallo Magnus , not only your letter to FIDE in November 2010 shows that you are not any longer the best chessplayer , since November 2010 Viswanthan is also again the chessplayer with the highest rating. Try to beat my worldrecord with mate in 550 here on youtube if you can ... kindly regards from Karlsruhe , Germany
Lutz Neweklowsky
Moremover 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hallo Magnus , not only your letter to FIDE in November 2010 shows that you are not any longer the best chessplayer , since November 2010 Viswanthan is also again the chessplayer with the highest rating. Try to beat my worldrecord with mate in 550 here on youtube if you can ... kindly regards from Karlsruhe , Germany
Lutz Neweklowsky
Moremover 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hallo Magnus , not only your letter to FIDE in November 2010 shows that you are not any longer the best chessplayer , since November 2010 Viswanthan is also again the chessplayer with the highest rating. Try to beat my worldrecord with mate in 550 here on youtube if you can ... kindly regards from Karlsruhe , Germany
Lutz Neweklowsky
Moremover 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hallo Magnus , not only your letter to FIDE in November 2010 shows that you are not any longer the best chessplayer , since November 2010 Viswanthan is also again the chessplayer with the highest rating. Try to beat my worldrecord with mate in 550 here on youtube if you can ... kindly regards from Karlsruhe , Germany
Lutz Neweklowsky
Moremover 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Magnus didnt beat the WORLD, he beats ONLY 3 GM with over 100 elo less than Magnus. Against the WORLD with the normal PC-Hardware and Stockfish 1.8 - or better Rybka-4-Software at home Magnus cant win and he knows this and the WORLD knows that his BOXING-show was only a DECEPTION. He said in this clip : Can YOU beat me
and I say to him now :
Yes WE can
kindly regards from Karlsruhe , Germany
Lutz Neweklowsky
Moremover 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hello Magnus , you didnt beat the - WORLD - you beat - ONLY 3 GM - with over 100 elo less than you have. Against the WORLD with the normal PC-Hardware and Stockfish 1.8 - or better Rybka-4-Software at home you cant win. The WORLD knows that your BOXING-show was only a DECEPTION. You say in your clip : Can YOU beat me
and I say to you now :
Yes WE can
kindly regards from Karlsruhe , Germany
Lutz Neweklowsky
Moremover 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hello Magnus , you didnt beat the - WORLD - you beat - ONLY 3 GM - with over 100 elo less than you have. Against the WORLD with the normal PC-Hardware and Stockfish 1.8 - or better Rybka-4-Software at home you cant win. The WORLD knows that your BOXING-show was only a DECEPTION. You say in your clip : Can YOU beat me
and I say to you now :
Yes WE can
kindly regards from Karlsruhe , Germany
Lutz Neweklowsky
Moremover 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
In the past our teachers were always the grandmasters and worldchampions, nowadays our teachers are the computers. They play , solve and compose . So have a look at youtube.com :
/watch?v=mwYQRteeHbE
or give in only : NEWEKLOWSKY
Moremover 1 year ago
I NEVER UNDERSTAND WHY THERE IS SO MUCH NOISE AND MOVEMENT WHEN CHESS PLAYERS PLAY :S
rsobhee 1 year ago
@rsobhee they are not really playing they are analyzing there game
adhdboy699 1 year ago
In Soviet Russia, CHESS plays YOU!
Fupper16 1 year ago 17
@Fupper16 So true, man, so true...
dachevashe 1 year ago
@Fupper16 What do you mean by that? I'm ignorant.
ahpacific 11 months ago
"ooh ok very computer chess.." just don't want to admit your opponent was better?
fresniak 1 year ago
I Highly respect those guy even though i dont know them.
Master8laster 1 year ago
How come they aren't using a chess clock? And how come they can retrieve moves? I thought that's against tournament rules.
RebelRay 1 year ago
this is after the game, they're analyzing....I hope you were joking..
momez86 1 year ago 4
this is post-match analysis
SatyaVenugopal 1 year ago
fischer would probably have been wc for 20 or so years if the damn soviets didnt put microchips in his brain, which caused him to go insane.
daelsterdam 1 year ago
Yeah no, the Soviets totally did that
Vexxnulvijfnul 1 year ago 2
Kasparov was a great player. None can deny it. But one never forget the immense soviet support system that was constantly at his disposal. Counsel from the best players in the world - including the personal attention of Botvinnik was no small advantage in Kasparov's development.
Fischer walked alone.
logant44 1 year ago
@logant44
I'm sorry, last time I checked Fischer wasn't the best player in the world for over 20 years, or maybe that's just my ignorance
sugardaddyzeus 1 year ago
He wasn't, no, he certainly had the ability to be had he chosen to defend the title.
m8cct 1 year ago
@logant44 Actually the Soviet school favored Karpov and tried to hold back Kasparov in favor of him, Kasparov had to prove he was the best anyway without their support.
chessguy0 1 year ago
yep, and despite training 12h a day he was whooped by amateur Euwe wo was a math teacher and sportsman also.
FlamingLion116 1 year ago
Alekhine was amazing, the greatest genius chess player ever. Alekhine is more than a chess player, he s a monster human. Alekhine had a prodigious memory. He spoke almost perfect new foreign languages, played in his legendary career around 50,000 serious parties. A record not dream Karpov, Kasparov, Fischer and many others together. Alekhine knew by heart all parties played the tournament 15 years ago the masters and those played 100 years ago the great masters.
mosu10 2 years ago
@mosu10 alekhine was a no life he study average 12 horus of chess per day. this guy was complety absorb by the game and he is the only wc to died with his title and a bank deposit of 3$
gtamateur 2 years ago 2
@mosu10 did you knew that "Dr." Aljechin wrote his dissertation about "criminal proceeding in China".
gorantrevise 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
kramnik was cheating, he moved a carlsen's piece!
antoniocherry 2 years ago
rotfl!
cypher010101 2 years ago
@antoniocherry
LOL!
sotovo 2 years ago 2
@antoniocherry
lol. good one
stockshunter 2 years ago
Morphy, Fischer, the greatest players of all time. And also throughly American! Go Yankees! Carlsen is a wonderful fusion of the two.
jsouce 2 years ago
Carlsen just smoked the competition at Pearl Springs (including Topalov) and is now rated 2801!
theprez98 2 years ago 18
@theprez98: i know, that's insane. second highest rating in the world, right after his teacher.
freaky011 2 years ago
It's over 2800!
Robotman42 1 year ago
@theprez98 In the March FIDE rating list he is in 2813, the second best in chess history after Kasparov's 2851 in July 1999.
x6801 1 year ago
@x6801 In addition, since chess ratings have inflated quite a bit since 1999, I think that Kasparov's rating then might be close to 2900 today.
sysweed 1 year ago
@theprez98 and now his 2813... and has current live rating of 2824,1 with just to more game to plays ( white and black ) and it the last tournament before the fide list of July. Carlsen is a beast
UnderDog988 1 year ago
@theprez98 Woot another one breaks 2800!
Robotman42 1 year ago
Are you kidding me? Carlsen in the World Open. He will go 9-0 with his eyes closed. A few years ago, Ivanchuk played in the New York Open and won every game and never used more than 45 minutes in any of his games.
whateverum 2 years ago
carlsen 9-0 thats funny, he is the dullest player on the planet next to leko (yes MUCH more boring than kramnik).
djcripsalot 2 years ago
Fischer is the greatest GM ever. When someone wins 19 straight games against GMs then we'll start making comparisons. Fischer in his prime would demolish Kasparov(whom I idolize), Karpov, Kramnik, Anand, and the rest of 'em. Fischer left the game to early otherwise he would have proven me right. He became a loon, but his chess was brilliant, and noone can take that from him.
dovespin1 2 years ago
Oh. A Fischer fan. Lots of these on youtube. :)
xiangyik 2 years ago
This has got to be a joke? 19 Straight games is great, take a look at Kasparov's personal record against the top players, he has a combined score of 42-0 against Shirov, Gelfand & Bareev!! Not including draws...
kasparov9 2 years ago
well this isn't worth debating, i may have exaggerated a bit but you can't deny fischer's greatness. at the very least he's kasparov's equal, and had they met on the board it would've been a great battle.
dovespin1 2 years ago
Yea, Kasparov is one of my favorites, but it sucks that he couldn't beat Kramnik when he faced him.
exodiaj 2 years ago
GM Wesley So, the upcoming chess star will beat magnus carlsen one of this days,gm so is just turned 15 and is 2641 elo rating, even higher than kasparov,fischer,carlsen,radjabov and karjakin when they turned 15
monpogi1 2 years ago
Do you mean win a game from Carlsen or win a match? There is a difference. The proof is in the pudding. We'll see what this kid is made of soon.
dovespin1 2 years ago
Rating is not the most accurate guage, Karpov, for example has never been particularly good in his rating, but the Russian is world champion for 10 years. And dont compare Wesley to Fischer, there can never be another of him. US Champion at the age of 14, less than 10 years later he's said to be the best in the world, at 29 he rampaged his way to the World Champion title after beating Spassky 7-3 with 11 draws. 3 years later he disappeared from the chess world... (and reappeared 20 years later)
BenBlunt1 2 years ago
Karpov was 2790, is that not a good rating ? lol
kasparov9 2 years ago
1000 better than me. lol
logant44 1 year ago
According to the FIDE website, Carlsen is No. 4 as of March 21 2009. He is only 20 points below Topalev, though. Which means he'll probably be No. 1 very soon.
He is the highest rated teenager ever, better than even Fischer or Kasparov.
Narwal88 2 years ago
Well when Kasparov got 2710 in January 1983,he was alone with Karpov.Today there are 2650 chaps I've never heard about....
gabisubis 2 years ago
I'm not sure how that is relevant.
Even Fischer, in his days, was head and shoulders above everyone else. He had a 2700 rating while Spassky et al. were in the 2500s.
Narwal88 2 years ago
I believe gabisubis is speaking about rating inflation. For example, if Fischer's peak strength in 1972 could be preserved and he played at that clip currently, his rating would easily exceed 2800
drcloak 2 years ago
Well, the rating is based on the number of victories against opponents whose rating is known.
Fischer beat his opponents x number of times, hence his rating. You may be right, but I'm not so sure. It's not the number of opponents you play that matters. It's the number of victories against them. Players today don't necessarily play more games per year than before. Kramnik & co play 20-30 games/year, not 300.
Narwal88 2 years ago
you can't compare carlsen to fisher. it's a different era. fisher did his own analysis without computers and teams of seconds like carlsen. even nakamura is easily carlsen's equal.
dovespin1 2 years ago
Carlsen is rated third in the world now.
He was born in 1990. Fischer was never that good at his age.
(Carlsen's opponents benefit from the same computer analysis. He is still the third best rated player in the world).
Narwal88 2 years ago 2
Rating inflation is due to a greater number of players. This introduces a higher total of points to go around, especially to the top guys. With one level feeding off the one below it, guys ascend to new heights but then level off as they play the other top 15 guys or so.
Btw, Fischer achieved the status of Grandmaster at a younger age than Carlsen. To this day, he is the youngest championship candidate EVER. Carlsen is a talent for sure, but he has some ways to go to catch Fischer.
yoyoSD 2 years ago
Carlsen achieved the title of GM at 13 years and 4 months old, while Fischer was 15 years and 6 months old. As for championship candidate, it doesn't matter as Fischer did not win until he was 27.
corbulo222 2 years ago
Players get better ratings faster nowadays but they aren't as experienced as grandmasters of the past. Fischer was an unrivaled talent in his day. He was a grandmaster when then next youngest grandmaster Boris Spassky was 6 years older. It does matter that Fischer was a champ candidate, he could've won without soviet interference before 1972. When Carlsen wins it all, get back to me.
dovespin1 2 years ago
Comment removed
yoyoSD 2 years ago
Are you insane! Nakamura = Carlsen! lol. I like Nakamura but that's a stretch!
peterwilkins19 2 years ago 2
It's not a stretch. Carlsen protects his rating by playing in category 18 or above round robins. Nakamura plays in opens and plays more against improving players so that they are stronger than their rating would suggest, so his rating takes a hit with draws and losses. Nakamura has no fear, and I suspect he doesn't worry about ratings that much. I want to see Carlsen play in the World Open or something similar and see what happens to his precious rating.
dovespin1 2 years ago
Wow Magnus is 18, I thought he was 12. :S Maybe he should grow a beard or something... :P
thecybercat 3 years ago
When this video was made, he was only 16.
Spiralendrache 2 years ago
anand nr.1 for now
robertbertstar 3 years ago
why are they moving each others pieces?
smog282 3 years ago
cos they are THT good. hahah
iamashooter 3 years ago 3
"cos they are THT good. hahah"
LOL!
NotThat3 3 years ago 2
they are analyse there played game and try some variations
Wismer1987 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
oh my god, your English so bad I do want to shot mine head and die
smog282 3 years ago
Not that your English is much better ("shot mine head").
viharsarok 2 years ago
Comment removed
barcdl 3 years ago
Magnus is Nr 1
christoffera 3 years ago
No, he's Nr 4
jayjay3dc 3 years ago
Maybe now.. but He as been nr 1 once! and Im sure He'll be that again!
christoffera 3 years ago
In your face to all you naysayers. He's currently number one in the world!
taffelost 3 years ago
very right...
CossacksChampion 3 years ago
my name is magnus and i come from norway!
now Magnus Carlsen is ranked number 1
magesus 3 years ago
ranked 6
DeepControl 3 years ago
hes numero 2 now! Move over KRAMnik, move over Anand... here comes the WONDERBOY!!!!!
Resendiz 3 years ago
ranked 2 ..
ojmuller66 3 years ago 3
now he is ranked as number 6 i think! on the live ratings!
nordanger99 3 years ago
5 actually.
Oppp2 3 years ago 3
1 as of now
taffelost 3 years ago
top 10 would be a closer catch
ultimatesonic88 4 years ago
I don't understand why carlsen isn't even talking.
mozart20dlubos 4 years ago
That's just something that comes with a lot of chess experience.
mozart20dlubos 4 years ago
It seems most chess players from non-english-speaking european countries all know how to speak english to a certain extent. That's impressive.
mozart20dlubos 4 years ago 2
Kramnik is the best out there. Anand is good in tournaments. Still Kramnik didn't show his stuff yet!!!
ArubaG 4 years ago
Vladimir is teaching this boy
1o0iii0oo07 4 years ago
'This boy' is ranked top 20 in the world.
mozart20dlubos 4 years ago
he could play with me
1o0iii0oo07 4 years ago
Wouldn't be a very long game.
mozart20dlubos 4 years ago
haha you don't know who im! :)
1o0iii0oo07 4 years ago
Are you ranked higher than him in the FIDE rating system ? If not, then I don't need to know who you are to know you probably can't beat him at chess.
mozart20dlubos 4 years ago
i was ranked higher
1o0iii0oo07 4 years ago
Ok. I apologize for assuming he could beat you.
mozart20dlubos 4 years ago
yes he could,im out of form
1o0iii0oo07 4 years ago
From a lei mans perspective this looks like nonsense but alot more is going on here than most people think
Markusqwertyuiop 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
very good movie
akat01 4 years ago
After the game is over, the two players talk to each other and move the pieces around and make moves that did not actually happen in the game. Sort of like "alternate endings" to a movie. Each player wants to see what the other player was thinking, or see if he has better moves than he actually played in the game.
bwilson87 4 years ago