Agriculture led to concentrations of wealth which became irresistable to theft which had to be defended against and so it escalated to warfare. The love of money is the root of all evil - and so-called civilization.
rrright... the reason why the Egyptian pyramids were build was because of war... And that the reason why they align with constellations is solely based on warfare. That would make alot of sense because i have none... I bock at this documentary, no need to see the rest.
ill tell you why people gave up the simple life - because they had to, because of land ownership, the new more aggressive type of human that was bred out of the city group, availability of food , and as the documentary says protection, if 2000 bc is the same as 6000 bc it was all about the quality of your shields - metalic woven clothing, spears and the power of the group you belonged to - as well as your ability to honer what you say
People would have been better off living in small villages,less worry,hardly any wide spread sickness,and no people with power to controll other's,the earth would be healthier.
I suppose, following my studies, that megalithic sturctures (most underwater too-see igorfrankenstein2 youtube page) belong of antediluvian human or allien civilisation and all small stone pyramids are made by survivals of the deluge Diluvio (from Caral to Visoko and chinese ons). From then on war was the leading song......unfortunately towards an unhappy humanity...
I remember watching a doc on the Ancient Egyptians uploaded by DrBogdanovic, they concluded that the pyramids were not built by slaves or aliens but by very devoted citizens who saw the Pharoh as "God on Earth". There was another doc that concluded that the Sphinx was eroded by to into the main shape allowing the imaginative Egyptians put the finishing touches on it 10,000 years ago. Too bad DrBogdanvic got banned he had a lot of good documentaries.
scientist always believe that ancient civilization were incapable of this, they didnt have tools, they didn't have the knowledge, they didn't have writing. but to accomplish the things our ancients did, they have to be very knowledgeable: math, writing, science. one thing for sure they were smarter than what we think; and we better accept it. just try to understand how people with no writing no advanced technology got together and make Tihuanaco And Pumapunku. i dont believe aliens helped.
Megalithic civilisations just started springing up about 10, 000 years ago.Like Britain, America, Africa, Europe and in Asia. The accepted theory that it was convergent does not sit well for I am wary of coincidence. I think there was trade across the oceans which for some reason, unknown to history, ceased. Plato suggested Atlantis, a myth which has a counterpart in S.America so that's where my money is.
@jacksawild Plato did not seriously suggest Atlantis - that was rhetoric in Timaeus. Plato makes plain that this Atlantis is fictional, and a fable, and that was believed by everyone to be the case until a crackpot in the early 20th century popularised the idea of it being real. There is no convergence in the building of megalithic structures. Bear in mind, too, that a pyramid is an extremely easy and natural structure: all one has to do to gain height is to, in effect, pile material up.
@jacksawild Why can't you just be satisfied with the truth? The fact is, people in the Americas and people on Afro-Eurasia independently developed things like megalithic architecture and writing, and these things developed out of earlier precedents, like rock art and small stone dwellings. There is no need to posit transoceanic voyaging, especially as that only complicates things: why would the Egyptians, for instance, go to *west* coast S. America? And that's only one example.
ar you aware my friend that ther was a newly ruined mountain, lake area beacue a natural vulcano that happened I think in the 80s.. the earth of the vulcano is now " nature" just like a million year old rock! the scientis are buffled after that. they now realise that a very recent natural disaster could miss lead anything.. therefore I say unless you have concrete evidence you wont know. and what can you do by carbon date.. nothing really.. science evolves each day..you never know whats right
we and no fucking one knows anyshit about all these monuments.. that is the most honest fucking words really.... pyramids could very well have existed 10,000 or 100,000 years earlier.. we have no clue, just because pharos were there doesnt mean they build the pyraids THEMSELVES
@leviterande Your right there was evidence the Great Sphinx might have been over 10,000 years old based on water erosion patterns on the walled enclosure of the monument which is consistent with the Neolithic Sub Saharan Wet phase pluvial but Dr. Zarhi Hawas as usual tried to obstruct and suppress any claim of such just like he had Dr. Joan Fletcher banned from Egypt.
afrocentrics like to believe that africans taught natives what they know, but archealogist are discovering ancient cities that predate most civilizations including the olmecs, yet the olmecs can be linked through architecture, our knowledge of pyramid building passed all through north and south americas, thats our pride and ours alone.
Agriculture led to concentrations of wealth which became irresistable to theft which had to be defended against and so it escalated to warfare. The love of money is the root of all evil - and so-called civilization.
DidivsIvlianvs 3 weeks ago
Revised do to gobekli tepe which is between 11-12,000 years old.
prreyreyland 3 months ago
rrright... the reason why the Egyptian pyramids were build was because of war... And that the reason why they align with constellations is solely based on warfare. That would make alot of sense because i have none... I bock at this documentary, no need to see the rest.
coolbelt86 10 months ago
@coolbelt86 and they have to make it so civilization does not start in Africa.
Ripupthat 9 months ago
ill tell you why people gave up the simple life - because they had to, because of land ownership, the new more aggressive type of human that was bred out of the city group, availability of food , and as the documentary says protection, if 2000 bc is the same as 6000 bc it was all about the quality of your shields - metalic woven clothing, spears and the power of the group you belonged to - as well as your ability to honer what you say
austpom333 11 months ago
People would have been better off living in small villages,less worry,hardly any wide spread sickness,and no people with power to controll other's,the earth would be healthier.
trx125tracy69 1 year ago
the history of Peru is amazing !!!! and still is more to see, nazca lines, machu picchu, chachan ruins, the amazons, quelap,
MrCebichazoloco 1 year ago
Where did Caral people come from? I need the answer for a writing assignment, please, answer this question!
danitzabj24 1 year ago
I suppose, following my studies, that megalithic sturctures (most underwater too-see igorfrankenstein2 youtube page) belong of antediluvian human or allien civilisation and all small stone pyramids are made by survivals of the deluge Diluvio (from Caral to Visoko and chinese ons). From then on war was the leading song......unfortunately towards an unhappy humanity...
MsArgentana 1 year ago
I remember watching a doc on the Ancient Egyptians uploaded by DrBogdanovic, they concluded that the pyramids were not built by slaves or aliens but by very devoted citizens who saw the Pharoh as "God on Earth". There was another doc that concluded that the Sphinx was eroded by to into the main shape allowing the imaginative Egyptians put the finishing touches on it 10,000 years ago. Too bad DrBogdanvic got banned he had a lot of good documentaries.
Weedies11 1 year ago
Even though we know a few things, we really know very little. Intriguing! Good series.
BLINDSIGHT8 1 year ago
scientist always believe that ancient civilization were incapable of this, they didnt have tools, they didn't have the knowledge, they didn't have writing. but to accomplish the things our ancients did, they have to be very knowledgeable: math, writing, science. one thing for sure they were smarter than what we think; and we better accept it. just try to understand how people with no writing no advanced technology got together and make Tihuanaco And Pumapunku. i dont believe aliens helped.
jwmsalvatrucho 1 year ago 2
Megalithic civilisations just started springing up about 10, 000 years ago.Like Britain, America, Africa, Europe and in Asia. The accepted theory that it was convergent does not sit well for I am wary of coincidence. I think there was trade across the oceans which for some reason, unknown to history, ceased. Plato suggested Atlantis, a myth which has a counterpart in S.America so that's where my money is.
jacksawild 1 year ago
@jacksawild Plato did not seriously suggest Atlantis - that was rhetoric in Timaeus. Plato makes plain that this Atlantis is fictional, and a fable, and that was believed by everyone to be the case until a crackpot in the early 20th century popularised the idea of it being real. There is no convergence in the building of megalithic structures. Bear in mind, too, that a pyramid is an extremely easy and natural structure: all one has to do to gain height is to, in effect, pile material up.
blackjamm 1 year ago
@jacksawild Why can't you just be satisfied with the truth? The fact is, people in the Americas and people on Afro-Eurasia independently developed things like megalithic architecture and writing, and these things developed out of earlier precedents, like rock art and small stone dwellings. There is no need to posit transoceanic voyaging, especially as that only complicates things: why would the Egyptians, for instance, go to *west* coast S. America? And that's only one example.
blackjamm 1 year ago
La historia de America es fascinante!!!
alcachofas37 2 years ago
it's called "radioactive carbon dating", mmkay leviterande?
danielmountain 2 years ago
ar you aware my friend that ther was a newly ruined mountain, lake area beacue a natural vulcano that happened I think in the 80s.. the earth of the vulcano is now " nature" just like a million year old rock! the scientis are buffled after that. they now realise that a very recent natural disaster could miss lead anything.. therefore I say unless you have concrete evidence you wont know. and what can you do by carbon date.. nothing really.. science evolves each day..you never know whats right
leviterande 2 years ago
we and no fucking one knows anyshit about all these monuments.. that is the most honest fucking words really.... pyramids could very well have existed 10,000 or 100,000 years earlier.. we have no clue, just because pharos were there doesnt mean they build the pyraids THEMSELVES
leviterande 2 years ago
@leviterande Your right there was evidence the Great Sphinx might have been over 10,000 years old based on water erosion patterns on the walled enclosure of the monument which is consistent with the Neolithic Sub Saharan Wet phase pluvial but Dr. Zarhi Hawas as usual tried to obstruct and suppress any claim of such just like he had Dr. Joan Fletcher banned from Egypt.
FrostedFlakeX 2 years ago
Comment removed
AnahuacNicanTlaca 2 years ago
afrocentrics like to believe that africans taught natives what they know, but archealogist are discovering ancient cities that predate most civilizations including the olmecs, yet the olmecs can be linked through architecture, our knowledge of pyramid building passed all through north and south americas, thats our pride and ours alone.
1racehumanrace 2 years ago