Added: 1 year ago
From: scooterscottii
Views: 9,139
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (52)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • very cool

  • How much power this puts out?

  • @moya138 thanks for your question. At this time I have made no measurments. It is possible that there is some power generation but that was not what this experiment was all about.

  • @scooterscottii okay , but you need power input to create a anti gravity concept.

  • @moya138 Do you work in this field? I am ALWAYS interested in getting any ideas or information you have. I have not come very far in my experimentation but I have great faith in the potential. Stay in touch......

  • @scooterscottii Do i work in this field what do you think so.Try looking at my profile first.

  • From my point of view, the gyroscopic force we call precession is supposed to resist a change in the orientation, not create it!

    What you showed here is very strange...

  • I see two effects you need to consider. Your driver coil is certainly applying a force to the rotor in the vertical axis. Check this by simply moving the driver coil to the opposite side of the rotor with the field in the same rotational direction. If the change in weight reverses it is the driver coil is applying more than a simple torque, it is also applying a push or pull on the rotor. Secondly you are most certainly generating eddy currents in your rotor which are also not a pure torque.

  • Absolutely dumbest experiment I've seen in a long while. You may as well be proving that a pound of feathers weighs less than a pound of bricks.

  • It's fair to say that Koziryov had a very poor understanding of both gyroscopic motion and thermodynamics.

  • @coasterpro Yes on one level that's true Kozirov had an immature understanding perhaps of gyroscopic and thermodynamic principals, however for his time and the given level of understanding at the moment he had a unique and perceptive understanding nonetheless. Vision and creativity plays an equal part in the understanding of all sciences. Thanks for your comment

  • @scooterscottii Out of curiosity exactly when was Kozirov's time? Gyroscopic motion and most of thermodynamics had been fully elucidated by the mid 1800's.

  • The starhhip wes not energised in this experiment. Howefer the magnetic field of the run coil might be effecting the results. THANKS for your comment

  • With the starship coil spinning the magnet it is probably the attractive force pulling on the magnet. when the coil is north the south side of the magnet is pulling towards the coil, and when the coil switches to south it is the north side of the magnet pulling towards the coil. that force that is causing the magnet to rotate is also the force that is counter acting gravity. As for weighing less the higher the frequency, the faster it spins the more air it moves, likely creating lift.

  • The cup of hot tea = same effect of a hot air balloon. Hot air rises and is adding a force pushing the scale up depending on what side it is on. Thus also counteracting gravity. As for your experiment when the tesla coil is on I would say it is probably the pull of the magnetic fields that cause the spin #1 as well as the "e-field" created from the high voltage. Which the attraction repulsion effect of an e-field is 26x greater than the force of gravity.

  • Here are my thoughts. On the Russian guys antigravity I would compare the gyroscope to a ceiling fan, pushing air up spinning one way and pushing it down spinning the other. It doesn't weigh less, but the force of the air moving provides a counteractive force to gravity, making it weigh less one way and making it weigh more the other. I would put money on saying that if the object was at rest the weight would be somewhere close to right in the middle of 92 and 95 grams.

  • I haven't watched it. I might give it a real try this afternoon and give you some constructive feedback :o

  • How can it weigh 92 grams spinning and 80 stationary, and show a weight loss from spinning?

  • @zebok3 Thanks for your question! I am not sure what the actual beginning weight was (non spinning) My test was to zero out the scale (non spinning) then watch to see if it lost weight after zeroing out the scale. The original weight measurement was not relative to anything. I hope this answers your question.

  • @scooterscottii I believe what zebok3 was referring to was that you stated in the video that although you say you don't know the weight of the gyroscope in its stationary state, you mention that it was probably around 80 gr. which would mean that the result of 95 and 92 gr. would be an increase in weight, not a loss showing anti-gravity properties so perhaps your mention of 80 gr. for stationary gyroscope was incorrect.

  • Anti-gravity, my ass

  • @Vhozard Thanks for your comment Vhozard. Are you saying your ass has antigravitic properties? If so I would really likerun some tests and to do some experiments on it. Please provide more information! scottii

  • How can it weigh 92 grams spinning and 80 stationary if it's loosing weight by spinning. Hasn't it occured to you that

    your figures show a weight gain not a loss?

  • thanks for your comments!

    

  • cool!!

  • great work! keep it up!!!!

  • You will have to reverse everything and see if the rotation of the earth is not giving you trouble. If it is the weight will increase. Of course that entire thing should be shelded as well to make sure the electro static charge is not bothering your experment. Nice work.

  • @SidneyBou Thanks for your comment. I am sure the rotation of the earth IS affecting the experiment. I am making a vertical form of this experiment which will provide more information. Any other ideas for me? I am somewhat stuck at the moment.........

  • Very fascinating!!! You are a quite smart individual. ~Socalsunset

  • It's interesting. I am about to start doing some experiments myself. The interesting part that I find lacking is that, if in fact a gravitational effect is happening (or space time distortion) then not only will a force occur, but also time would be altered as well as light bending.

    So any chance you could throw a laser in there, or a very small quartz resonator and measure the resonator's natural frequency under the influence of the coil?

    If inertial mass is changing, then the frequency will.

  • The earth is moving

  • @colefirearms11 Every object in the infinitum is constantly moving! Thanks for your comment... Scott :O)

  • It's gonna take much more than just electricity and electro-magnetics to do gravity propulsion. Super conductors, M-theory, string theory, supersymmetry, antimatter, exotic matter maybe. Electro static force, electro conductivity, and magnetism is only a little piece of the puzzle. Even if we were to find a way to produce controllable title gravity field, flux or waves we would still have to come up with a way to warp space time to even get across the vast distances within our lifetimes.

  • @athews1976 Thanks for your comments... YES there is SOOOOOOooo much more more to learn. Each little experiment is just a tiny step .. you have to start somewhere though and it's the process od discovery that makes life worth living. Scott :O)

  • in the diagram at the start wasn't the rotor vertical and your version horizontal a possible big difference to the original experiment ?

  • @Risenangelicaegis YES it's possible that would make a difference. I am almost finished with a vertical version and finally applying the hvhf to the RC this time. Stay tuned! Thanks for your comment. Scott

  • Your video has a couple of my synapses firing :-) Did you ever try mounting the starship coil on the same apparatus that was being weighed? So as to eliminate any effect the coil may or may not have on raising or lowering the rotor. Thanks for sharing.

  • @min2oly GOOD! We are on the same page..I am developing a vertical model of the experiment having a magnetically suspended rotor. That way only the weight of the rotor will be measured. Also the RODIN starship will be energised with the HVHF current directly.. then I will modulate the frequencies of that RESONANCE!!! Thanks for your interest........ Scott :O)

  • Very cool. I think the effect you are seeing is due to the Frank Zappa book. :-)

  • @morpher44 YES my friend I know that you are right. I used that book and a few other hints as to the actual nature of the experiment. Frank always considered a continuation of the previous one. THANKS for noticing. and happy motoring! Scott

  • ok, admit it, you just are not wanting to do weight watchers right, you plan on selling this fat reducer so people feel less guilty when they get on the scales ha ha ha ;-) Very interesting experiment. Thanks for sharing.

  • @marthale7 OK I admit it I need to loose some weight. What better way than a couple of hundred thousand volts! :O) THANKS for watching ...

  • Thanks for using my Starship coil in this experiment.

    Richard

  • @hhoforvolts Richard thanks for your comment. I have given a lot of thought to the vortex quality of the RC. I like the narrower focus of the RSC as you have shown in your vids. I have a vision of focusing the HVHF potential using the RSC as a magnifying glass of sorts much like the coil in a cathode ray tube controls the electron beam hitting the screen. There are some problems to overcome of course but any ideas you have to share would be welcome.... Scott

  • Hi Scott.

    I now that every of your videos contains tons of useful informations and they are inspiring too.

    Good Job

    Andy

  • @AndyTheGreyFox Thank you Andy it is very gratifying to be of help. We all need each and every experimenter on the job 24 hours of the day. We can do it together and personally have at least something to do with solving the energy problems on Earth at this time........ Happy motoring

  • Great stuff my friend, experimentation is for me the best thing to discover something....! be careful with tesla....!

  • @skycollection Jorge THANKS for your input. I am very excited about the development of this project. Your videos have been a wonderful inspiration. I couldn't have done it without you! We must discover these things for ourselves and not wait for others to just hand it to us. WE CAN DO IT! :O)

  • SORRY...It was not clear from the video but there WAS a small reduction in weight (small but significant) when the HVHF was added to the spinning armature!

  • Amazing insight and experiment Scott.I am interested in Inertial propulsion and gyroscopes have featured in many inertial thrusters and they seem to be having an effect here as you have an up thrust and this wants looking at..Great stuff and great Tesla coil.Jonny.

  • @jonnydavro Jonny thanks for your thoughts. My experiment is very crude but provides a platform for further experiments and networking of ideas. I hope I can provide some inspiration for some of those experimenters and thinkers who can take this further than I am able. Happy motoring......

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more