I did some checking a while back on the 16th amdt. - there was a supreme court ruling that the amendment granted the federal government no new powers of taxation (sorry, I don't have the citation, and it's a bear to find - oddly - the supreme court's website doesn't display opposing opinions chronologically - or at all - they're farmed out). I wouldn't suggest following the supreme court's ruling though - unless you're prepared for the (unconstitutional) consequences.
Well, now that we're in this leaky boat together, at least we can all be grateful that we have nothing to fear from an all-seeing, all-encompassing, all-powerful Federal government. It's not like there is One Supreme Leader who regularly ignores the Constitution, who relies on essentially government-controlled media spewing pro-Supreme Leader propaganda and hateful smear campaigns to harm his enemies. If THOSE things were happening, we'd all be in big trouble. Lucky for us, huh?
I'm not American. Here in Australia there was a push around the 1920's for the State of Western Australia to seccede from the Commonwealth. It didn't happen but they still joke that it can happen and it's always in the back of the minds of Australians with an interest in our own Constitution.
I wonder as an outsider what would happen to the US if Texas and Arizona secceded. Ever since that TV show Jerico explored issues of corrupt government, I've wondered, would you all be better off like that
@Siegetower Texas had a tourism ad a few years back because of their geographical diversity "It's like a whole other country" (it was once). It would be interesting to see - the state is as populous as Canada, Bigger than France - and exceptionally Un-French.
unconstitutional on all levels. The general attitude and spirit of the constitution and declaration of independence, that of individual rights, was great. But the constitution was flawed. It allowed for regulations. What should be pushed for is a constitutional amendment or complete revision so as to be more clear that all levels of government are restrained.
I think this video misses one key issue. The states ought to be as limited as the federal government. It is absurd to think that somehow when the states expropriate your wealth it is somehow legitimate.
This is what the Civil War settled, states do not have the right to allow slavery.
This is one of the key platform issues that ruins the legitimacy of the conservative movement. It should concentrate on combating government controls at all levels on the principle that it should be...
Seems Madison was so preoccupied with force from the gun that he overlooked the power, thus the use of force through duress, of money. Washington and Jefferson weren't so naive, but alas, have fallen on deaf ears.
@madmath1 No, there was no income tax. Also, it appears that the ocnstitution evisioned a deecent standaing NAvy, but not a large Amry. However, this was found to be lacking during the war of 1812.
I did some checking a while back on the 16th amdt. - there was a supreme court ruling that the amendment granted the federal government no new powers of taxation (sorry, I don't have the citation, and it's a bear to find - oddly - the supreme court's website doesn't display opposing opinions chronologically - or at all - they're farmed out). I wouldn't suggest following the supreme court's ruling though - unless you're prepared for the (unconstitutional) consequences.
ObiWanShinobi1 1 month ago
To be fair, almost all civil and criminal law is state.
zvi303 1 month ago
Well, now that we're in this leaky boat together, at least we can all be grateful that we have nothing to fear from an all-seeing, all-encompassing, all-powerful Federal government. It's not like there is One Supreme Leader who regularly ignores the Constitution, who relies on essentially government-controlled media spewing pro-Supreme Leader propaganda and hateful smear campaigns to harm his enemies. If THOSE things were happening, we'd all be in big trouble. Lucky for us, huh?
DuaneEH 1 month ago
I'm not American. Here in Australia there was a push around the 1920's for the State of Western Australia to seccede from the Commonwealth. It didn't happen but they still joke that it can happen and it's always in the back of the minds of Australians with an interest in our own Constitution.
I wonder as an outsider what would happen to the US if Texas and Arizona secceded. Ever since that TV show Jerico explored issues of corrupt government, I've wondered, would you all be better off like that
Siegetower 1 month ago
@Siegetower Texas had a tourism ad a few years back because of their geographical diversity "It's like a whole other country" (it was once). It would be interesting to see - the state is as populous as Canada, Bigger than France - and exceptionally Un-French.
ObiWanShinobi1 1 month ago
unconstitutional on all levels. The general attitude and spirit of the constitution and declaration of independence, that of individual rights, was great. But the constitution was flawed. It allowed for regulations. What should be pushed for is a constitutional amendment or complete revision so as to be more clear that all levels of government are restrained.
AlexanderEBott 1 month ago
I think this video misses one key issue. The states ought to be as limited as the federal government. It is absurd to think that somehow when the states expropriate your wealth it is somehow legitimate.
This is what the Civil War settled, states do not have the right to allow slavery.
This is one of the key platform issues that ruins the legitimacy of the conservative movement. It should concentrate on combating government controls at all levels on the principle that it should be...
AlexanderEBott 1 month ago
@AlexanderEBott You're correct, and if I ever get to do a series on a state constitution, I'll note that. [Scott Ott]
ScrappleFace 1 month ago
@AlexanderEBott Well, then amend your state constitution.
zvi303 1 month ago
Seems Madison was so preoccupied with force from the gun that he overlooked the power, thus the use of force through duress, of money. Washington and Jefferson weren't so naive, but alas, have fallen on deaf ears.
madmath1 1 month ago
@madmath1 No, there was no income tax. Also, it appears that the ocnstitution evisioned a deecent standaing NAvy, but not a large Amry. However, this was found to be lacking during the war of 1812.
zvi303 1 month ago
AtheistRightWing, you are, of course, correct, although that's not the emphasis of this episode. Thank you for watching.
ScrappleFace 1 month ago
ehm, there WAS a war. The war of suthern independence anyone?
AtheistRightWing 1 month ago
So what now? Jesus Christ..
DoctorTopper 1 month ago
I agree...
TheReddragon64 1 month ago
Well said... Unfortunately
BillPigg 1 month ago 2