I love watching Keith Olberman and Jon Stewart get self righteous about Fox News being "propagandist"...LOL..these two shills are ridiculous Liberal loons who have an agenda behind anything they say....hypocrites.
@steelhuevos Jon is a comedian, he is liberal, but that has nothing to do with it. He's comedic material is influenced by politics, so what? He's not a political commentator, so for the most part, he shouldn't be taken too seriously.
And Olberman is almost as bad as Bill O, but definitely not on the same level, yet.
@steelhuevos Olberman yes, Stewart less so. If you actually watch his programs he picks on Fox because frankly, it's easy. However he also calls out liberals quite often, and even ran a piece that supported Ron Paul, who's about as conservative as they come.
Damn straight Stewart has an agenda. It's to get people to think for themselves do some fact checking, and not to take anything said by politicians or pundits on faith.
It's rather sad in a way that we have to go to a TV station were it's principle programming is comedy just to get Political News that's not loaded with bias and hidden candor.
At that last bit when O'Reilly is just spouting lies, Jon looks almost defeated as he shakes his head. He knows there's no sense in debating with these fucks.
I admit that i used to watch Fox news. I used to actually watch Bill Reilly. After seeing how Fox changed the sound track of a republican debate question to Dr. Ron Paul from cheers to boos, I'm done! That is sickening to me and someone should go to jail for it.
It's very sad that Comedy Central's John Stewart and Steven Colbert are the most unbiased sources of political news in this country. They may lean left, but they do make fun of both sides when it's warranted. They have at least given some respect to Dr. Ron Paul too. I love these guys!
Stewart's right! I used to watch Fox. No more! I don't like the other channels either -- they're ALL propaganda. Despite being conservative, I can't STAND Hannity and O'Reilly has become pompous and unwatchable. So I've turned them ALL off! Yes, FOX is propaganda too. I listened to Rush, UNTIL he called the protesters names, one right after another. I applaud ANYBODY who gets out in the streets and protests this DISASTER of a federal government and presidency. ALL these JERKS ignore Ron Paul
so the factor cut those bits out...so what?? It's not new to edit....and wow look how quick another station is to point it out. Wasted a segment on that?...we need real news
@MESHASMGUD Because the "news" orgs are politically driven. They are biased. News orgs should report the news exactly so the viewer is not misinformed....yet these news orgs are the pinnacle or mis-information to back their own politcal agenda.
@MESHASMGUD when the news became just another political scheme to try and indoctrinate you one way or the other, i too weep for the day when news became just another way to set up propaganda for liberals or conservatives. The news media organizations don't trust the American public to think on their own therefore they think for them.
We are the Factor, surrender your minds, and sell us your souls. We will add your biological and political distinctiveness to our own. Resistance is futile.
Those were interesting clips but am I the only one who thinks Olberman is over sensationalizing himself as some person who bravely uncovered this secret uncensored version that would otherwise never see the light of day?
I mean the thing was posted on Fox News website, right? And such an interview usually does have to be cut for time. Maybe their editorial decisions for the tv version were questionable but Fox didn't try to hide those parts nearly as much as Olberman made it sound like.
Fortunately I don't get Fox (in Canada), so I only see O'Reilly's idiocy on Youtube or when Jon Stewart or Steven Colbert ream him a new a-hole on their shows.
But given how popular people like Bill O'Reilly (and Glenn Beck et al) actually are, I shudder to imagine the vast hoards of Americans who must eat that crap up.
What explains it?
Are there really that many angry uneducated bigoted right wing Americans that O'Reilly has an audience?
@Dbane567 About MSNBC doing the same thing that Fox does, it is a bit true. Especially when Olbermann was there.He was the king of hyperbole. I think what they really try and set out to do is to get people to think for themselves. If we had true, unbiased journalism, I don't think MSNBC would have any need to strike back and forth with Fox. They seem to be in a constant state of damage control they perceive to be coming out of Fox.
Maybe not the best tactic, but still fairly respectable.
It is outrageous for Jon Stewart to claim that he does not manipulate his videos. I have watched both Fox News and the Daily Show at great length; anyone with a nonpartisan eye can clearly see that Jon Stewart is not a legitimate journalist (he has also admitted this). Stewart is a wise guy who cleverly executes liberal tactics to a heavily biased audience.
The great thing about Jon Stewart is his moderate bipartisanship. He doesn't think in terms of party lines. He thinks about the wrong and right of every idea. I've seen him support very progressive and liberal viewpoints and I've also seen him have the best conservative interviews with the likes of Ron Paul. Republicans are doing this to themselves with people like Glenn Beck and Bill Oreilly putting in there two cents.
If the best the lunatic fringe can produce is the witless Olbermann then the far-left are in trouble. Stewart is a comedian who pretends to be Jewish and loves the Hollywood losers to the point of parody.
@Gales99 Soooo..what you are REALLY saying is "John Stewart makes my uber conservative heroes look like idiots, and that embarrasses me". Just admit it.
Jon Stewart comes across to me as sort of anti-goverment, it seems like he has a libertarian perspective on things. Which is great, we need more people like him in our country, sadly though, most people (also like him) tend to stay out of politics.
@Jiggs1097 i think he can come off as anti-government because he is attempting to retain a sense of bipartisan mockery. His whole position is using satire to criticize politics and by criticizing both sides of politics, he retains a higher level of legitimacy than that of the O'Reilly factor.
To be fair the presidency is an enormous undertaking with extremely broad, global circumstances and ramifications. Criticizing the executive branch, along with the other branches accurately and with humor, although hard, does not in my humble opinion show capability of holding the highest office in our country. Admittedly, I would be interested in seeing him run. But as I said one does not translate to the other in my opinion.
To be fair the presidency is a enormous undertaking with extremely broad, global circumstances and ramifications. Criticizing the executive branch, along with the other branches accurately and with humor, although hard, does not in my humble opinion show capability of holding the highest office in our country. Admittedly, I would be interested in seeing him run. But as I said one does not translate to the other in my opinion.
its funny because jon stewart would easily make a much better, fair, down to earth polititian...yet people wouldn't take him seriously because he is a comedian. its a shame
That is what news should be about questions and questions morons that is what reporters do news are for people but MSNBC likes to cover Fox News instead of real news. MSNBC -- you suck ass... :D
Oh Keith, don't you find it a bit odd that while Fox News talks about politics and news, you spend your show talking about Fox News? You get paid for this? You are what is wrong with news agencies these days, not FOX. Talk about a political agenda. You got thrown off television once, and off you should have remained.
@Biggerbyte "Oh Keith, don't you find it a bit odd that while Fox News talks about politics and news, you spend your show talking about Fox News? You get paid for this? You are what is wrong with news agencies these days, not FOX. Talk about a political agenda. You got thrown off television once, and off you should have remained.
What a loser."
Is it maybe like an expose? If Fox news is misleading people I think reporting it would be important.
The most Ironic thing about this piece of REAL COMMENTARY NEWS is that,...John Stewart is really a commedian and Oreilly is just a Piece of shit Commentator with no real credentials of any sort and the Commedian has more sense and Correct Facts than the Supposedly smarter host.
Does this come as a surprise to anyone? FOX has a decorated history of taking statements out of context, and I knew that's what was going to happen with Stewart going onto O'Reilly's show. I'm not liberal or conservative. Both parties are full of shit. BUT, the only political affiliation I associate myself with is "NOT REPUBLICAN". Evil, Evil people.
@ShaithMaster - Yeah. That's usually the only reason I vote... just to vote for SOMEONE other than the Republican candidates. I'll fill in a name if they are unopposed in small town elections for non-prominent positions. It's all I can do.
So often does the subject that Jon Stewart would definitely win as President, and succeed, come up when me and my friend talk about stuff during homeroom.
Stewart has to have an IQ of like 200 or something. His creativity, cleverness and responsiveness is hands down the best I have ever seen in my lifetime.
Well, if O'Reilly was really trying to take some parts of the interview out of context, then he WOULDN'T HAVE PUT IT ON HIS WEBSITE! Its STUPID to say that O'Reilly cut out parts of his interview to make Stuart look like an idiot when he POSTED THE ENTIRE INTERVIEW ONLINE!!! HE DID THAT FOR A REASON! Has the world gone insane??
@bRizzle2009100 That's a non sequiter. "The full version is online, so the TV version must have totaly been in context". Bullshit.
You are able to ACTUALLY WATCH both the fox version, and the full version, and see the exact parts that were cut out. YOU CAN SEE THE DECEPTION HAPPENING RIGHT IN FRONT OF YOUR FACE, AS YOU WATCH THE ACTUAL VIDEO. It's stupid to say that he didn't edit the interview in a biased way, just because the unedited version was online. Watch it and decide for yourself.
@HippieGuitarBoy So your telling me that O'Reilly purposely took parts of the interview out of context by cutting and editing it to make Stewart look like an idiot. Then he posted the entire unedited interview online but by doing that he would expose himself in his allegedly cutting and editing parts of the interview to take Stewart out of context. It just doesn't make sense to me. O'Reilly never posts entire interviews online, but he did in this case. Why? To expose himself? Doesn't make sense.
@bRizzle2009100 Two ways that it would make sense is if, as Olberman put it, "O'Reilly's personality is so fragile that a little feint praise often causes him to drop his guard and do something revealing", or if he really is that much of an idiot. The fact that he posted it online for a short while doesn't mean the TV version was perfect. I repeat, it's a non sequiter, it's irrelevant.
As I said before, you can watch both, and see for yourself, instead of just blindly going with a feeling.
@HippieGuitarBoy I have watched both many times and I don't see a difference. We all know what Stewart thinks of FOX News and his claims against FOX News are not new. I don't take Stewart seriously at all bc he is a comedian and not a news source. On O'Reilly, do u seriously believe that if he was indeed trying to make Stewart look like idiot he would post the entire interview online? That's like saying the White House had no idea Van Jones had made statements saying he was a communist.
@bRizzle2009100 The thing is, fact checking tends to lean towards Jon Stewert, a self titled comedy show, over Fox News, a self proclaimed news show. Just go to LiberalViewer right here on youtube, and you can see hundreds of examples of fox news bias and something like 40+ examples of editing out of context, while the Daily Show only has a few known infractions against it for its editing, and it's excues for its bias because it admits to being comedy.
@HippieGuitarBoy So let me get this straight, u say that the facts lean towards Jon Stewart bc a guy named LiberalViewer tells u it does? The Center for American Progress can release stats about something then the Heritage Foundation can come out the day after with stats to refute theres. U are using a source that admits its liberal bias to expose the bias of a conservative source? I mean OF COURSE A LIBERAL SOURCE IS GOING TO SAY THAT ABOUT A CONSERVATIVE SOURCE! And vice-versa! lol
@bRizzle2009100 I couldn't give a fuck what LiberalViewer's opinions are. I go to his channel because he fact-checks fox's videos, and then clearly presents the facts. He's less biased than fox, and more factual. Bearing in mind that Jon Stewert is an open comedy show, and Fox is a supposed news show, Fox makes an aweful lot of mistakes and lies compared to The Daily Show.
I suggest you check my source before you discount it. It's not some propaganda show like Fox. It's anti-propaganda.
@HippieGuitarBoy Like I said, u are getting your information from someone who openly admits there liberal bias. Then u call out others who watch FOX News saying that they have a conservative bias and therefore cant be trusted based on the information the liberal source told u. Of course a liberal source is going to say that about a conservative source and vice-versa. U see the hypocrisy here? U say cant trust FOX News bc they have a conservative bias but u don't have problem with liberal bias.
@bRizzle2009100 the difference is that Fox News, as a national media outlet, has an obligation to report the facts. If an 'opinion guy', as O'Reilly likes to call himself, wants to state his personal beliefs on a matter, so be it. However, if a national media outlet states facts that they have not validated and ultimately turn out to be false, they have an obligation to the American people to correct their mistakes.
@ezelouie It use to be on the O'Reilly Factor website right after the interview was taken. Idk if its still there. Im sure you can find it on YouTube some wheres.
I dont have a dem/rep bias, but everytime I see olberman hes talking about fox news, he sounds obsessed with them. And he has that same stupid ass smirk when he talks like George Bush... fucking annoying
Just recently I heard several people on faux new call pres. Obama a QUISLING!! If that isn't like aiding and abetting the enemy I don't know what is. I don't take calling my pres. of my country that kind of slanderous names lightly.!! So TO say they never do that is as big a lie as everything else. Can citizens sue for libel on Obama's behalf??
Being Canadian I cannot understand how the United States continues to be an "effective" democracy. Your political system makes Berlosconi look like a prophet.
@hmcsstar1 Well, as an American looking at you I am convinced it must be that you don't know jack-shit about our political process, or you don't know jack-shit about the level of corruption Berlusconi is guilty of. It could be you are terribly ignorant about both, but for sure at least one. We do have an effective democracy. We don't have an effective television news media, which to the best of my knowledge very few people take seriously anyway.
@hmcsstar1 also being a canadian, i can't understand the sanctimony of some of our peoples' comments when our current PM is really nothing more than a US lackey, as have been many (but not all) modern PMs. Obama asks him for jets to bomb libya... without any consultation with other parties he sends them off to do their killing in some other distant country's civil war. unlike the southerners we can't even use the excuse that it's for oil. it's just pure ass-kissing from our bootlicking "leader".
@hmcsstar1 people keep calling it a democracy -- which isn't true at all. The United States is a representative republic whereby we use democratic elections for our representatives. All the partisan bullsh*t is what has turned this into country into a war of two houses more worried about the next election rather than the people in it.
@hmcsstar1 No shit. How do you think we feel? and it is certainly not an effective democracy. Don't confuse the citizens here with the government that we allowed to run amok dur to the many humanoids who are actually in office here.
@hapidjusboy ha no actually. I would say Allan West 2012 but I know that scares you because you are drugged up and lazy and want that welfare check at the 7th of every month.
@s5b678 though i think hed do a good job i think jon would freak out from the stress cause hes more of a comedian but i think he does have alot of good ideas
So Jon Stewart goes on O'Relly and "destroys" them by saying the brilliance of FOX news is the block of op/ed programming? Let's see we have Mattews, O'Donnell, Olbermann, Maddow, Shultz........................am I missing something here? How ironic that Stewart spoke of some bullshit "FALSE EQUIVILENCY" and his "why are we here" rally and then tried to make Fox out to be something that's a 180 from MSNBC? What a complete court jester fail!
@hatfisc Fox has been debunked thousands of times. Check out Wendell Potter's blog and the movie; OutFoxed: Rupert Murdoch's War on Journalism. As far as I know there have NEVER been such claims about MSNBC. They have some Pundits on the left, but their regular news is as fair as it gets.
@g4macdad How do you "debunk" conservative or liberal bias? Potter is now working with a far-left advocacy group, the Center for Media and Democracy. No such claims about MSNBC? Did you not watch Lawrence O'Donnel just last night? He called a cartoon racist for dipicting Obama with big ears. No deception or baiting there with liberal bias. None. Whatsoever. Was Stewart off base for calling out Olbermann on his hate rhetoric last year?
It helps to research things yourself instead of having someone else do it when you'll reject it anyway. Just go to wiki for starters. Before you even click on the site from the search page you see that it's described as a liberal group founded by environmentalists. I understand that this doesn't mean that Mr. Potter is a complete liberal propagandist but you cannot ignore what people are tied to.
@g4macdad Now you're starting to get a little defensive. Looks like I need to take your hand and walk you along a little further. Let's go to the website together, shall we? I'll send you the link. Let's look at this as kind of a political I.Q. test. Most of these groups consider themselves "non-partisan." LMAO! Do you think any site would claim to be "a complete shill for a political party?" Look at the headlines of their "news stories." Koch brothers? Budget crisis? Come on.
@g4macdad I guess you're giving up on this argument. I think you're also so easily missing the point. So I guess all the "propaganda" is saved for right wing facists? I feel like I'm having a disagreement with my five year old son. Maybe you could space out your single line attempts at an argument just a few lines more to create the illusion of content. I was afraid that what I was trying to explain would fly right over your head and I was right. Glen Beck? Yeah, you're an idiot.
@g4macdad Once again, how do you "debunk" liberal or conservative bias? This is the second time you've blindly thrown that out there and this is now the second time that I'm asking you to explain. If you can't, I won't be surprised and we can move on. I suggest that you wipe the drool off your chin and quit sounding like your typical seventeen year old desparate to be considered politically minded. You've been unable to intelligently present your argument without using tired cliches.
@g4macdad I've clearly presented my case and argument. You must be kidding me. There's deflection, which you're doing, then there's completely acting stupid while pretending to hold debate.I've at least been opened minded and intelligent enough to see that our media is covered by two different idealogies but you're not that far yet.So you're telling me that there's a "peoples news" and then there's Fox News. I'll just do for you what I do for my son, land the fish and let him reel it. You win.
@g4macdad cont. Bottom corner, Mr. Potter having chummy interview with Michael Moore? Hmmm, the typical rant against Israel, the demonization of physicians who speak out against Obamacare. It's all there pal. Even the Tides Foundation is one of their financial supporters. Still can't hear me? I think your phone is off the hook.
The Court Jester has always been allowed to speak the truth (bitter and hard as it may be) to the kings face where anyone else would be executed. Jon Stuart is our Court Jester, willing and able to say the truth and phrase it as a joke so it is easily accepted.
@g4macdad interestingly enough as keith was trying to make his far more successful competition look bad he also only showed jon criticizing oreilly and cut out bills defense. also you are in idiot for the other half of your comment
You have a choice; SOCIALISM, or move to the mountains and do EVERYTHING on your OWN.
* Exploiting others for your personal gain is NOT an option. Make your choice like a MAN, and live by it. Don't sit around in front of your TV or radio like a little BITCH!
No wonder MSNBC have such horrible ratings.... Their stuff is boring, and really doesn't prove what they were there to prove from the beginning. How about and i'm just saying maybe, how about they start reporting ACTUAL news, instead of "trying" to blast other corporations and or people.
@yo1o2eggs The comedian has to be careful because the jokes have to be based on the truth to be funny, while FOX McNews just wants to push their agenda.
First of all, videos of Olbermann should be clearly labeled so I don't have to see this little prick's face without warning. Secondly, it's quite true that the vast majority of Keith's guests are people who agree with him.
@BelowAverage355 actually Ron Paul isn't very strongly coservative he supports many liberal views.
floatingtoesters2 1 week ago
I miss Keith Olbermann :(
puddinggreg 1 month ago 3
I miss Keith Olbermann :(
puddinggreg 1 month ago
I love watching Keith Olberman and Jon Stewart get self righteous about Fox News being "propagandist"...LOL..these two shills are ridiculous Liberal loons who have an agenda behind anything they say....hypocrites.
steelhuevos 2 months ago
@steelhuevos Jon is a comedian, he is liberal, but that has nothing to do with it. He's comedic material is influenced by politics, so what? He's not a political commentator, so for the most part, he shouldn't be taken too seriously.
And Olberman is almost as bad as Bill O, but definitely not on the same level, yet.
SKiiSMLIVE 2 months ago
@steelhuevos Olberman yes, Stewart less so. If you actually watch his programs he picks on Fox because frankly, it's easy. However he also calls out liberals quite often, and even ran a piece that supported Ron Paul, who's about as conservative as they come.
BelowAverage355 1 month ago
@steelhuevos
Damn straight Stewart has an agenda. It's to get people to think for themselves do some fact checking, and not to take anything said by politicians or pundits on faith.
RespectYourViews 1 month ago
It's rather sad in a way that we have to go to a TV station were it's principle programming is comedy just to get Political News that's not loaded with bias and hidden candor.
SternLX 2 months ago
"The Factor....you refer to it like it's The Borg."
I LOVE John Stewart!
campaigner111 3 months ago
harrahhsment settlement lol wtfffff? harassment* funny as hell tho sick last word
crustytowel 3 months ago
At that last bit when O'Reilly is just spouting lies, Jon looks almost defeated as he shakes his head. He knows there's no sense in debating with these fucks.
ManifestedPerfection 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Ron Paul 2012
kamina77 4 months ago
I admit that i used to watch Fox news. I used to actually watch Bill Reilly. After seeing how Fox changed the sound track of a republican debate question to Dr. Ron Paul from cheers to boos, I'm done! That is sickening to me and someone should go to jail for it.
CarlDRocco 4 months ago
It's very sad that Comedy Central's John Stewart and Steven Colbert are the most unbiased sources of political news in this country. They may lean left, but they do make fun of both sides when it's warranted. They have at least given some respect to Dr. Ron Paul too. I love these guys!
CarlDRocco 4 months ago
Stewart's right! I used to watch Fox. No more! I don't like the other channels either -- they're ALL propaganda. Despite being conservative, I can't STAND Hannity and O'Reilly has become pompous and unwatchable. So I've turned them ALL off! Yes, FOX is propaganda too. I listened to Rush, UNTIL he called the protesters names, one right after another. I applaud ANYBODY who gets out in the streets and protests this DISASTER of a federal government and presidency. ALL these JERKS ignore Ron Paul
kingwarth 4 months ago
O'Reilly you are a damn liar!
finally0726 5 months ago
so the factor cut those bits out...so what?? It's not new to edit....and wow look how quick another station is to point it out. Wasted a segment on that?...we need real news
marcus1701 6 months ago
Olberman and Oreilley are both cunts.
Reido2828 6 months ago
Ron Paul - President
John Stewart - Vice President
2012? Anyone?
Justbeatit999 6 months ago 32
This has been flagged as spam show
@Justbeatit999
more like
Ron Paul - President
John Stewart - Toilet Cleaner
skuterixas91 4 months ago
@Justbeatit999 Ron paul is an idiot too. He's probably the best candidate so far but god he sucks.
fundles420 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@fundles420 "Ron paul is an idiot too. He's probably the best candidate so far but god he sucks."
Detail how he "sucks".
I'm tired of people mindlessly repeating some opinion that was implanted into their brain and are utterly convinced they actually formed that opinion.
fuzzywzhe 3 months ago
@Justbeatit999 john stewart......why not just re-elect bush
lorne852 2 months ago
@Justbeatit999 Stewart should be the pres and Paul the VP
idunnononame 2 months ago
What the fuck is up with America and your the wars between your news stations?! .
What happened to the news just being fucking news?
MESHASMGUD 6 months ago 16
@MESHASMGUD Because the "news" orgs are politically driven. They are biased. News orgs should report the news exactly so the viewer is not misinformed....yet these news orgs are the pinnacle or mis-information to back their own politcal agenda.
gouda25 6 months ago
@MESHASMGUD when the news became just another political scheme to try and indoctrinate you one way or the other, i too weep for the day when news became just another way to set up propaganda for liberals or conservatives. The news media organizations don't trust the American public to think on their own therefore they think for them.
Drgigolo2022 2 months ago
Why is he covering this? So lame Olbermann.
TheNubbbler 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
RICK PERRY document fraud! $6,000,000,000.00 How did ya hide that one Eh...gov? You didnt you clown! I've got the document!!
Just google search these three words; DEM LEGAL SCENTS
wwwdemlegalscentscom for the whole story! Nunchaku Politics Bayou Style
stevespell2 6 months ago
We are the Factor, surrender your minds, and sell us your souls. We will add your biological and political distinctiveness to our own. Resistance is futile.
rapture25z 6 months ago
Those were interesting clips but am I the only one who thinks Olberman is over sensationalizing himself as some person who bravely uncovered this secret uncensored version that would otherwise never see the light of day?
I mean the thing was posted on Fox News website, right? And such an interview usually does have to be cut for time. Maybe their editorial decisions for the tv version were questionable but Fox didn't try to hide those parts nearly as much as Olberman made it sound like.
Knightmessenger 6 months ago
Olbermann's last comment = Brutal
BrKT85 6 months ago
Fortunately I don't get Fox (in Canada), so I only see O'Reilly's idiocy on Youtube or when Jon Stewart or Steven Colbert ream him a new a-hole on their shows.
But given how popular people like Bill O'Reilly (and Glenn Beck et al) actually are, I shudder to imagine the vast hoards of Americans who must eat that crap up.
What explains it?
Are there really that many angry uneducated bigoted right wing Americans that O'Reilly has an audience?
yoursuchagoodguy 6 months ago 3
@yoursuchagoodguy yes (i'm an american by the way)
howudoin915 6 months ago
Why does msnbc pretend there any different then fox news?
Dbane567 6 months ago
@Dbane567 About MSNBC doing the same thing that Fox does, it is a bit true. Especially when Olbermann was there.He was the king of hyperbole. I think what they really try and set out to do is to get people to think for themselves. If we had true, unbiased journalism, I don't think MSNBC would have any need to strike back and forth with Fox. They seem to be in a constant state of damage control they perceive to be coming out of Fox.
Maybe not the best tactic, but still fairly respectable.
CidMcTab 6 months ago
It is outrageous for Jon Stewart to claim that he does not manipulate his videos. I have watched both Fox News and the Daily Show at great length; anyone with a nonpartisan eye can clearly see that Jon Stewart is not a legitimate journalist (he has also admitted this). Stewart is a wise guy who cleverly executes liberal tactics to a heavily biased audience.
getdjman 6 months ago
God I wish we had a Jon Stewart in England!
nealtracy 7 months ago
@nealtracy John Oliver
jomoorigotto 6 months ago
I'm not a liberal, but Jon Stewart is awesome and O'Reilly's a dumbass. Case closed.
gorboy 7 months ago 2
hahahaha!!! effin epic!
TayDaSneak 7 months ago
The great thing about Jon Stewart is his moderate bipartisanship. He doesn't think in terms of party lines. He thinks about the wrong and right of every idea. I've seen him support very progressive and liberal viewpoints and I've also seen him have the best conservative interviews with the likes of Ron Paul. Republicans are doing this to themselves with people like Glenn Beck and Bill Oreilly putting in there two cents.
Swemba 7 months ago 2
If the best the lunatic fringe can produce is the witless Olbermann then the far-left are in trouble. Stewart is a comedian who pretends to be Jewish and loves the Hollywood losers to the point of parody.
Gales99 7 months ago
@Gales99 Soooo..what you are REALLY saying is "John Stewart makes my uber conservative heroes look like idiots, and that embarrasses me". Just admit it.
Mozart1220 7 months ago
did this guy get fired again..hummm
realroadrunner69 7 months ago
what a bamf
JustJealouse514 7 months ago
Jon Stewart comes across to me as sort of anti-goverment, it seems like he has a libertarian perspective on things. Which is great, we need more people like him in our country, sadly though, most people (also like him) tend to stay out of politics.
Jiggs1097 7 months ago
@Jiggs1097 i think he can come off as anti-government because he is attempting to retain a sense of bipartisan mockery. His whole position is using satire to criticize politics and by criticizing both sides of politics, he retains a higher level of legitimacy than that of the O'Reilly factor.
parkerthehicks 7 months ago
@Jiggs1097
No he's a liberal, he's said so himself. He's in favor of raising the taxes on the richest Americans
talldrumking12 7 months ago
O'Reilly is an Independent.
iluvpoliticzz 7 months ago
@iluvpoliticzz O'Reilly is an Asshole.
EFG44 7 months ago
@iluvpoliticzz "O'Reilly says he is an Independent".
I fixed that typo for you
zzyzx0788 7 months ago
To be fair the presidency is an enormous undertaking with extremely broad, global circumstances and ramifications. Criticizing the executive branch, along with the other branches accurately and with humor, although hard, does not in my humble opinion show capability of holding the highest office in our country. Admittedly, I would be interested in seeing him run. But as I said one does not translate to the other in my opinion.
bigmitch47 7 months ago
To be fair the presidency is a enormous undertaking with extremely broad, global circumstances and ramifications. Criticizing the executive branch, along with the other branches accurately and with humor, although hard, does not in my humble opinion show capability of holding the highest office in our country. Admittedly, I would be interested in seeing him run. But as I said one does not translate to the other in my opinion.
bigmitch47 7 months ago
JON STEWART... PRESIDENT 2012 !!!!!
atomicdecent 8 months ago
its funny because jon stewart would easily make a much better, fair, down to earth polititian...yet people wouldn't take him seriously because he is a comedian. its a shame
carlose0318 8 months ago
His voice is so deep
1loveshop 8 months ago
That is what news should be about questions and questions morons that is what reporters do news are for people but MSNBC likes to cover Fox News instead of real news. MSNBC -- you suck ass... :D
DevilsHabitat 8 months ago
Jon Stewart is good ppl. I'd forgive him even if a photo of him clubbing baby seals surfaced.
RohRohToday 8 months ago
Oh Keith, don't you find it a bit odd that while Fox News talks about politics and news, you spend your show talking about Fox News? You get paid for this? You are what is wrong with news agencies these days, not FOX. Talk about a political agenda. You got thrown off television once, and off you should have remained.
What a loser.
Biggerbyte 8 months ago
@Biggerbyte "Oh Keith, don't you find it a bit odd that while Fox News talks about politics and news, you spend your show talking about Fox News? You get paid for this? You are what is wrong with news agencies these days, not FOX. Talk about a political agenda. You got thrown off television once, and off you should have remained.
What a loser."
Is it maybe like an expose? If Fox news is misleading people I think reporting it would be important.
hawklord2001 8 months ago
@Biggerbyte and fox news does nothing but complain about liberals.
what a sheep.
phuphroo 7 months ago
Jon Stewart's got balls of steel
mexicanmayhem88 8 months ago
Something I wanted to say for a long time. I couldn't have said it any better!
kkim1177 9 months ago
The most Ironic thing about this piece of REAL COMMENTARY NEWS is that,...John Stewart is really a commedian and Oreilly is just a Piece of shit Commentator with no real credentials of any sort and the Commedian has more sense and Correct Facts than the Supposedly smarter host.
mannymmv 9 months ago
I would vote for once if Colbert ran for president and Jon Stewart for VP
snowboarder8985 9 months ago
Hahahaha Fox news is the worst ever.
arizonastyle 9 months ago 3
WELL DONE STEWART. Greedings from Denmark
Ronaldinjiia 9 months ago
7 employees at fox news disliked this video
87andrelee 9 months ago
Does this come as a surprise to anyone? FOX has a decorated history of taking statements out of context, and I knew that's what was going to happen with Stewart going onto O'Reilly's show. I'm not liberal or conservative. Both parties are full of shit. BUT, the only political affiliation I associate myself with is "NOT REPUBLICAN". Evil, Evil people.
cthuluforever 9 months ago
@cthuluforever that's exactly how i feel. SPOT ON man
ShaithMaster 8 months ago
@ShaithMaster - Yeah. That's usually the only reason I vote... just to vote for SOMEONE other than the Republican candidates. I'll fill in a name if they are unopposed in small town elections for non-prominent positions. It's all I can do.
cthuluforever 8 months ago
You've got to love Olbermanns little bullshit jab at jon stewart at the end of that
erock31155 9 months ago
@erock31155 he made no jab at Stewart at the end. The jab was towards O'reilly.
77bogart 9 months ago in playlist interesting knowledge
You've got to love Olbermanns little bullshit jab at jon stewart at the end of that
erock31155 9 months ago
So often does the subject that Jon Stewart would definitely win as President, and succeed, come up when me and my friend talk about stuff during homeroom.
candlewick163 9 months ago
Stewart has to have an IQ of like 200 or something. His creativity, cleverness and responsiveness is hands down the best I have ever seen in my lifetime.
sagequan 10 months ago
Well, if O'Reilly was really trying to take some parts of the interview out of context, then he WOULDN'T HAVE PUT IT ON HIS WEBSITE! Its STUPID to say that O'Reilly cut out parts of his interview to make Stuart look like an idiot when he POSTED THE ENTIRE INTERVIEW ONLINE!!! HE DID THAT FOR A REASON! Has the world gone insane??
bRizzle2009100 10 months ago
@bRizzle2009100 That's a non sequiter. "The full version is online, so the TV version must have totaly been in context". Bullshit.
You are able to ACTUALLY WATCH both the fox version, and the full version, and see the exact parts that were cut out. YOU CAN SEE THE DECEPTION HAPPENING RIGHT IN FRONT OF YOUR FACE, AS YOU WATCH THE ACTUAL VIDEO. It's stupid to say that he didn't edit the interview in a biased way, just because the unedited version was online. Watch it and decide for yourself.
HippieGuitarBoy 9 months ago
@HippieGuitarBoy So your telling me that O'Reilly purposely took parts of the interview out of context by cutting and editing it to make Stewart look like an idiot. Then he posted the entire unedited interview online but by doing that he would expose himself in his allegedly cutting and editing parts of the interview to take Stewart out of context. It just doesn't make sense to me. O'Reilly never posts entire interviews online, but he did in this case. Why? To expose himself? Doesn't make sense.
bRizzle2009100 9 months ago
@bRizzle2009100 Two ways that it would make sense is if, as Olberman put it, "O'Reilly's personality is so fragile that a little feint praise often causes him to drop his guard and do something revealing", or if he really is that much of an idiot. The fact that he posted it online for a short while doesn't mean the TV version was perfect. I repeat, it's a non sequiter, it's irrelevant.
As I said before, you can watch both, and see for yourself, instead of just blindly going with a feeling.
HippieGuitarBoy 9 months ago
@HippieGuitarBoy I have watched both many times and I don't see a difference. We all know what Stewart thinks of FOX News and his claims against FOX News are not new. I don't take Stewart seriously at all bc he is a comedian and not a news source. On O'Reilly, do u seriously believe that if he was indeed trying to make Stewart look like idiot he would post the entire interview online? That's like saying the White House had no idea Van Jones had made statements saying he was a communist.
bRizzle2009100 9 months ago
@bRizzle2009100 The thing is, fact checking tends to lean towards Jon Stewert, a self titled comedy show, over Fox News, a self proclaimed news show. Just go to LiberalViewer right here on youtube, and you can see hundreds of examples of fox news bias and something like 40+ examples of editing out of context, while the Daily Show only has a few known infractions against it for its editing, and it's excues for its bias because it admits to being comedy.
You want news? Avoid Fox.
HippieGuitarBoy 9 months ago
@HippieGuitarBoy So let me get this straight, u say that the facts lean towards Jon Stewart bc a guy named LiberalViewer tells u it does? The Center for American Progress can release stats about something then the Heritage Foundation can come out the day after with stats to refute theres. U are using a source that admits its liberal bias to expose the bias of a conservative source? I mean OF COURSE A LIBERAL SOURCE IS GOING TO SAY THAT ABOUT A CONSERVATIVE SOURCE! And vice-versa! lol
bRizzle2009100 9 months ago
@bRizzle2009100 I couldn't give a fuck what LiberalViewer's opinions are. I go to his channel because he fact-checks fox's videos, and then clearly presents the facts. He's less biased than fox, and more factual. Bearing in mind that Jon Stewert is an open comedy show, and Fox is a supposed news show, Fox makes an aweful lot of mistakes and lies compared to The Daily Show.
I suggest you check my source before you discount it. It's not some propaganda show like Fox. It's anti-propaganda.
HippieGuitarBoy 9 months ago
@HippieGuitarBoy Like I said, u are getting your information from someone who openly admits there liberal bias. Then u call out others who watch FOX News saying that they have a conservative bias and therefore cant be trusted based on the information the liberal source told u. Of course a liberal source is going to say that about a conservative source and vice-versa. U see the hypocrisy here? U say cant trust FOX News bc they have a conservative bias but u don't have problem with liberal bias.
bRizzle2009100 9 months ago
Comment removed
kconarro3 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@bRizzle2009100 the difference is that Fox News, as a national media outlet, has an obligation to report the facts. If an 'opinion guy', as O'Reilly likes to call himself, wants to state his personal beliefs on a matter, so be it. However, if a national media outlet states facts that they have not validated and ultimately turn out to be false, they have an obligation to the American people to correct their mistakes.
kconarro3 9 months ago
where can i see the entire interview?
ezelouie 10 months ago
@ezelouie It use to be on the O'Reilly Factor website right after the interview was taken. Idk if its still there. Im sure you can find it on YouTube some wheres.
bRizzle2009100 10 months ago
I dont have a dem/rep bias, but everytime I see olberman hes talking about fox news, he sounds obsessed with them. And he has that same stupid ass smirk when he talks like George Bush... fucking annoying
yubertuber987 10 months ago
Just recently I heard several people on faux new call pres. Obama a QUISLING!! If that isn't like aiding and abetting the enemy I don't know what is. I don't take calling my pres. of my country that kind of slanderous names lightly.!! So TO say they never do that is as big a lie as everything else. Can citizens sue for libel on Obama's behalf??
pammitty 10 months ago
Being Canadian I cannot understand how the United States continues to be an "effective" democracy. Your political system makes Berlosconi look like a prophet.
hmcsstar1 11 months ago 20
@hmcsstar1 remember, we're still a young nation. We haven't had much time to fuck up that bad
SQUASHem92 10 months ago
@hmcsstar1 Well, as an American looking at you I am convinced it must be that you don't know jack-shit about our political process, or you don't know jack-shit about the level of corruption Berlusconi is guilty of. It could be you are terribly ignorant about both, but for sure at least one. We do have an effective democracy. We don't have an effective television news media, which to the best of my knowledge very few people take seriously anyway.
EpsilonLessThan0 10 months ago
@hmcsstar1 The words "being Canadian" answers your own question.
catchrnthkudzu 6 months ago
@hmcsstar1 also being a canadian, i can't understand the sanctimony of some of our peoples' comments when our current PM is really nothing more than a US lackey, as have been many (but not all) modern PMs. Obama asks him for jets to bomb libya... without any consultation with other parties he sends them off to do their killing in some other distant country's civil war. unlike the southerners we can't even use the excuse that it's for oil. it's just pure ass-kissing from our bootlicking "leader".
movitmovit 6 months ago 2
@movitmovit (thumbs up)
jh78669 5 months ago
@hmcsstar1 people keep calling it a democracy -- which isn't true at all. The United States is a representative republic whereby we use democratic elections for our representatives. All the partisan bullsh*t is what has turned this into country into a war of two houses more worried about the next election rather than the people in it.
chaosaxis 5 months ago
@hmcsstar1 No shit. How do you think we feel? and it is certainly not an effective democracy. Don't confuse the citizens here with the government that we allowed to run amok dur to the many humanoids who are actually in office here.
BaronTurco 5 months ago
go Jon Stewart! you tell em :D
ArchonofFate 11 months ago
Frost/Nixon, anyone?
Dupidorian 11 months ago
To summarize the video:
FOX NEWS LIES ! ! !
bikaren1980 11 months ago 3
Anti-bush protestors are gay.
HIMYNAMEISEVAN 11 months ago
Jon Stewart 2012 anyone?
s5b678 11 months ago 173
@s5b678 ummm no.... he is a comedian. not a politician... Silly liberal
MrBelrox 9 months ago
@MrBelrox O'reilly 2012 for you then? Or is the rapture coming next saturday?
hapidjusboy 9 months ago
@hapidjusboy ha no actually. I would say Allan West 2012 but I know that scares you because you are drugged up and lazy and want that welfare check at the 7th of every month.
MrBelrox 9 months ago
@MrBelrox on the 7th* if you're going to say something ignorant say it correctly.
hapidjusboy 9 months ago
@MrBelrox Reagan was an actor not a politician. BOUYYAAH
rostharan 9 months ago
@s5b678 He's too smart for that!
mrthebillman 9 months ago
@s5b678 O if we only lived in that world.
starchwrecker 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@s5b678 Jon Stewart 2012 <<<---- NO, THE FACT HE IS A GREAT COMEDIAN DOES NOT GUARANTEE HE WOULD MAKE A GREAT POLITICIAN..... NOT ANOTHER ARNOLD...
communistjesus 8 months ago
@s5b678 you know if enough people voted for him he could be elected without being part of any party lols I wish.
GUNS4MIKE1234 8 months ago
@s5b678 Fuck that, if Stewart is president who will we have to make fun of the president?
zzyzx0788 7 months ago
@s5b678 FUCK YEAH!
RamsesTheGreater 7 months ago
@s5b678 Only if he is Ron Paul's VP.
Gazerich 7 months ago 2
@s5b678 though i think hed do a good job i think jon would freak out from the stress cause hes more of a comedian but i think he does have alot of good ideas
Darthsantana 6 months ago
@s5b678 Nah...Ron Paul man..
Jroy9108 6 months ago
LMAO Jon Stewart destroyed oreilly hes awesome
shakasrepresent 11 months ago 2
the Borg hahahahahahahahaha
drlawitts 1 year ago
Man. I had to skip all thee Olberman parts. I fucking hate him and i'm a Democrat :P
sarahiscool1 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
check out FOX NEWS THE AMERICAN TERRORISTS on you tube
kennyddd1 1 year ago
Fox News is crap - embarrasingly it's shown in a lot of other countries, no wonder the US is hated
carriemia12 1 year ago
So Jon Stewart goes on O'Relly and "destroys" them by saying the brilliance of FOX news is the block of op/ed programming? Let's see we have Mattews, O'Donnell, Olbermann, Maddow, Shultz........................am I missing something here? How ironic that Stewart spoke of some bullshit "FALSE EQUIVILENCY" and his "why are we here" rally and then tried to make Fox out to be something that's a 180 from MSNBC? What a complete court jester fail!
hatfisc 1 year ago
@hatfisc Fox has been debunked thousands of times. Check out Wendell Potter's blog and the movie; OutFoxed: Rupert Murdoch's War on Journalism. As far as I know there have NEVER been such claims about MSNBC. They have some Pundits on the left, but their regular news is as fair as it gets.
g4macdad 1 year ago
@g4macdad How do you "debunk" conservative or liberal bias? Potter is now working with a far-left advocacy group, the Center for Media and Democracy. No such claims about MSNBC? Did you not watch Lawrence O'Donnel just last night? He called a cartoon racist for dipicting Obama with big ears. No deception or baiting there with liberal bias. None. Whatsoever. Was Stewart off base for calling out Olbermann on his hate rhetoric last year?
hatfisc 1 year ago
@hatfisc The center for media and democracy, is "far left"? Please explain that claim.
g4macdad 1 year ago
It helps to research things yourself instead of having someone else do it when you'll reject it anyway. Just go to wiki for starters. Before you even click on the site from the search page you see that it's described as a liberal group founded by environmentalists. I understand that this doesn't mean that Mr. Potter is a complete liberal propagandist but you cannot ignore what people are tied to.
hatfisc 1 year ago
@hatfisc Was the source of you "information"; nonpartisan? If it wasn't, that is pretty much like the pot calling the KETTLE black.
g4macdad 1 year ago
@g4macdad Now you're starting to get a little defensive. Looks like I need to take your hand and walk you along a little further. Let's go to the website together, shall we? I'll send you the link. Let's look at this as kind of a political I.Q. test. Most of these groups consider themselves "non-partisan." LMAO! Do you think any site would claim to be "a complete shill for a political party?" Look at the headlines of their "news stories." Koch brothers? Budget crisis? Come on.
hatfisc 1 year ago
@hatfisc
Their headlines are all factual accounts of right-wing propaganda. That HARDY qualifies them as "left-wing".
*
When people debunk the ignorant garbage that is Fox News propaganda, it does not make them"left-wing".
*
I can tell you are a brainless follower of Glenn Beck, the DOLT wrangler.
*
Libertarianism/anarcho-capitalism=FASCISM.
g4macdad 1 year ago
@g4macdad I guess you're giving up on this argument. I think you're also so easily missing the point. So I guess all the "propaganda" is saved for right wing facists? I feel like I'm having a disagreement with my five year old son. Maybe you could space out your single line attempts at an argument just a few lines more to create the illusion of content. I was afraid that what I was trying to explain would fly right over your head and I was right. Glen Beck? Yeah, you're an idiot.
hatfisc 1 year ago
@g4macdad Once again, how do you "debunk" liberal or conservative bias? This is the second time you've blindly thrown that out there and this is now the second time that I'm asking you to explain. If you can't, I won't be surprised and we can move on. I suggest that you wipe the drool off your chin and quit sounding like your typical seventeen year old desparate to be considered politically minded. You've been unable to intelligently present your argument without using tired cliches.
hatfisc 1 year ago
@hatfisc
Care to point out these "tired cliches"?
Sounds like you are trying to TAP DANCE now. Be a little more specific.
*
What exactly IS your "argument"? That Glenn Beck "Liberatarianis/ anarcho-captalism" is NOT fascist?
*
Listening to a pundit does NOT qualify as "education". Go learn political FUNDAMENTALS first.
*
BTW my son is 8, and my oldest of three daughters, is 19. So I am NOT impressed.
g4macdad 1 year ago
@g4macdad I've clearly presented my case and argument. You must be kidding me. There's deflection, which you're doing, then there's completely acting stupid while pretending to hold debate.I've at least been opened minded and intelligent enough to see that our media is covered by two different idealogies but you're not that far yet.So you're telling me that there's a "peoples news" and then there's Fox News. I'll just do for you what I do for my son, land the fish and let him reel it. You win.
hatfisc 1 year ago
@hatfisc
If you would use your critical thinking to ACTUALLY seek the "inconvenient" truth, you would come to a higher level of understanding.
*
The key s in the "ideologies" themselves.
One ideology CLEARLY states it's position as "of the people," the other is emphatical in it's pursuit of autocracy.
*
This is the problem with America today. People are SO lazy, that they want to dive into political discussions without learning fundamentals FIRST.
g4macdad 1 year ago 2
@hatfisc
Let me give you an indisputable example; Some networks give equal time to George Soros AND Glenn Beck. See if you can guess which "networks" DON'T?
*
Don't behave like a Fox News SIMPLETON.
g4macdad 1 year ago
@hatfisc
Okay, I googled it also, and there are MORE claims that it is a NON-PARTISAN organization, than NOT.
*
Please hangup, and try again...
g4macdad 1 year ago
@g4macdad cont. Bottom corner, Mr. Potter having chummy interview with Michael Moore? Hmmm, the typical rant against Israel, the demonization of physicians who speak out against Obamacare. It's all there pal. Even the Tides Foundation is one of their financial supporters. Still can't hear me? I think your phone is off the hook.
hatfisc 1 year ago
@sagax04 Yet they remain number one and Keith Olbermann is......................well.
hatfisc 1 year ago
I love Jon Stewarts tactic of splitting hairs since he hasn't anything concrete to bitch about.
hatfisc 1 year ago
i hate keith olbermann he thinks hes so smart
pplus0440 1 year ago
"...I'll pay of part of next harassment settle..."
brutal last word from Olbermann.
BrKT85 1 year ago
fuck fox news and MSNBC, both are garbage networks. if you sheep believe one is better than the other go hang your self.
fedex1107 1 year ago
The Court Jester has always been allowed to speak the truth (bitter and hard as it may be) to the kings face where anyone else would be executed. Jon Stuart is our Court Jester, willing and able to say the truth and phrase it as a joke so it is easily accepted.
Otokogoroshi 1 year ago
Fox Fascists
gymnosophy 1 year ago
did anyone else freak out at 3:50? I was like what happening to his face?!?
clinker243 1 year ago
This is why Olberman was axed. They cannot let the truth infect the masses.
*
We would actually prosper, and every right-wing fascist would perish.
g4macdad 1 year ago
@g4macdad interestingly enough as keith was trying to make his far more successful competition look bad he also only showed jon criticizing oreilly and cut out bills defense. also you are in idiot for the other half of your comment
pplus0440 1 year ago
@pplus0440
You have a choice; SOCIALISM, or move to the mountains and do EVERYTHING on your OWN.
* Exploiting others for your personal gain is NOT an option. Make your choice like a MAN, and live by it. Don't sit around in front of your TV or radio like a little BITCH!
g4macdad 1 year ago
@g4macdad How about...capitalism and i keep doing what ever i want? your response was incoherent i have no idea what it meant or how it was relevant
pplus0440 1 year ago
@pplus0440
Of course you don't understand what it meant. You are an illiterate Fox "News" monkey.
g4macdad 1 year ago
@g4macdad yeah....
pplus0440 1 year ago
CLICK MY CHANNEL FOR BILL OREILLY ON COLBERT REPORT
SceneRequest 1 year ago
stewart is an entertainer, he uses politics to be relevant. nothing wrong with that. but look elsewhere for facts
ConservativeDrummer 1 year ago
Lol is this even news? Get a life Keith Olbermann.
BarbershopHero 1 year ago
No wonder MSNBC have such horrible ratings.... Their stuff is boring, and really doesn't prove what they were there to prove from the beginning. How about and i'm just saying maybe, how about they start reporting ACTUAL news, instead of "trying" to blast other corporations and or people.
MickeyCTejas 1 year ago
It's sad that a comedian would be more careful with the integrity of the context than a news organization.
yo1o2eggs 1 year ago 71
@yo1o2eggs The comedian has to be careful because the jokes have to be based on the truth to be funny, while FOX McNews just wants to push their agenda.
mrthebillman 9 months ago
@yo1o2eggs Hahahaha that's a good one!! ....aaaaaaa...."news organization" ....Fox.....that's funny :)
DemonDrummer1018 9 months ago 30
lol Oreilly is the hive mind of the borg, true story
MoralisticAthiest 1 year ago
keith, y u mad tho?
LazyMapleSunday 1 year ago
DAAAAAAAAAAMN!!! JON STEWART JUST MADE IT RAIN TRUTH ON THIS FOX BITCH!!! OOOOOOOOOOHHHHHHH SHIT!!!
Bulldog76center 1 year ago 3
watch?v=luYXODFktzs
MrBishopWalters 1 year ago
I love how the greedily rich can just drop some money and trick dumb people into supporting them. Its astounding.
SOSTacoJohnson 1 year ago
First of all, videos of Olbermann should be clearly labeled so I don't have to see this little prick's face without warning. Secondly, it's quite true that the vast majority of Keith's guests are people who agree with him.
backwoodsninja 1 year ago