look at tht fat old guy by the guy askin bush questions i can tell wut hes thinkin hes thinkin wut is this guy talkin about like a dumbass he obiously was there for a reason to learn, he really should be lookin up jenny craig in the phonebook some pilates or somethin fat fuck hahahahaha owned
hmmmm .. its another red-letter day for the terror-appeasing LIBERALS .. seems as though Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto was MURDERED today by one of the left's constituents. Keep your celebration brief fuckdrips .. cause in the end you're going down !
Keith: who are you and I kidding, majority rules. by the last account we had 59 million ignorant and careless people, and still counting. Majority rule does not mean democracy in many cases, it means tyranny. That is what we have in US now. Tyranny of evil minds in the government ignorance of their constituent. Therefore lie all you want what difference does it make?
the difference it made is young men and wemon being murdered from this country and the middle east, half the people that joined the service thought they had to do it to stop them from nukeing us. Bush might as well have pulled the fucking trigger himself, GO FUCK YOURSELF BUSH ADMINISTRATION GO FUCK YOURSELF, they probably will never read that either bastards
"The largest decline was suffered by Greta Van Susteran's On The Record (-22%), followed closely by O'Reilly (-21%). Hannity & What's His Name took the Bronze (-17%). Of the MSNBC programs opposite those losers, Olbermann's Countdown was the biggest gainer (55%), which I'm sure doesn't bother O'Reilly at all."
Keith, Bush said. "Sadaam Hussein protects terrorist, including members of AlQueda"! Where is it in the Bush's speech where he said Sadaam was responsible for 9/11? Maybe I am missing something! And of course Sadaam would support a group of terrorist that were successful in infiltrating the U.S. and causing so much death. What Bush was afraid of is Sadaam teaming up with Aqueda and giving them the WMD's that he used to kill thousands of Kurd's! Who does Keith think he's F---ing kidding?
MESSAGE TO ALL OF YOU BUSH HATERS! THE ISLAM RELIGION CALLS ON ALL THEIR FOLOWERS TO KILL EVERY ONE OF YOU PEOPLE TOO! What is happening in Iraq is that our troops are the bait for all the Radical Islams! And yes, that's is a good thing! Better our troops kill them in Iraq, then have to fight them on the streets here! For every 1 American G.I. they kill, our troops kill 25 terrorists! 25 to 1 kill ratio in our favor and people think were losing in Iraq!
Hey Ushit441, where the hell did you get that retarded idea. For every innocent Iraqi we kill how many "Terrorists" do we create. Oh and when are you going over there to be bait you 1/2 witted mother fucker. Oh and no matter how much you try to lie to yourself moron, we are losing because GW is the biggest fuck up to hold the office bar none.
Well, unlike you, I can make a point without calling people names. Real mature! If you didn't hate the military so much. All you would have to do is ask them what's happening in Iraq. They will tell you the exact opposite of what the Lib Media tells Americans!
'calling people names is immature' - you then proceed to call others 'terrorist supporters' 'iliterate' 'ignorant' 'immature' and part of a brainwashed collective by Dem/Lib media conspiracy. Name calling is perhaps ok when you do it? Guilty: of hypocrisy : of flawed ad hominem. But I don't feel sorry for you, I just find *your* ignorance & immaturity funny.
Someone that can only express themselves by telling someone to "fuck-off","you peice of shit","sucking dick" is plain and simple an ignorant person. Calling someone ignorant is not in any way the same as using those words! "Ignorant" is not a curse word Hoodidge. And if you think it is, I FEEL SORRY FOR YOU! Unlike Dems in here, I can articulate my position on the issues without cursing! And where did I write the word "brainwashed"? If your going to slam me, please don't lie about what I write!
Why don't you just admit it. Your on the Terrorists side! Your so partisan that you want to see the U.S. lose the war for your Dem Party! Oh sad! No, how scary! I don't like Clinton, but I would back him if our troops are in harms way if he was still the prez!
If the majority of New Yorkers are as ignorant as you. It clearly explains why New Yorkers like Hillary Clinton!I want to Thank You NYSLOT for enlightening me on the true ignorance of New Yorkers! Now you can go ahead and call me all kinds of foul language, as I now understand your ignorance! By the way, "ignorance" is not foul language! Now go back to praising AKBAR! And no, I won't explain what akbar means to you!
EVERY single war in history is a "total nightmare"! Do you think the G.I.'s in WW2 were just having a blast storming the beaches of Normandy and Iwo Jima? You are the perfect example of what Democratic Leaders want from Americans. I bunch of ignorant, illiterate people like you that cannot care for themselves without the Goverment! By the way, is there any Dem in here that can articulate thier position without name calling?
I wonder how many innocent Iraqi's are killed comapred to every American GI.. Can you post the website where you found your numbers? How do you know they were "terrorists"? Did Fox no-news tell you that??
There is no way that I could possibly respond to your ridiculous thought process in 500 letters. Besides, its obvious that you think the U.S are the "bad guys" in this War. Since you feel that way, you and I will NEVER agree on anything about this war. I beleive it is necessary and you don't! And they don't allow enough space for me to properly tell you why your wrong!
Has Olberman converted to Islam? Jeez, the way this guy talks about our President sure makes me think he has! He talks alot of shit, but does not give any solutions on how we fight Radical Terrorist that are going to bring to the USA what they do to Israel! That is terrorists strapping bombs to themselves and going into crowed places! Wake up people these Islams are dead serios about wiping us off the map. And it seems like the only people who know it ae Republicans!
Yea right Ushit441, the Republicans are the Terrorists helpers. They try to terrorize the American people everyday and it has worked on your pathedic pussy ass. Go whine about the media and the Dems all you want they're going to kick some ass now.
What, can't make an intelligent point,so you resort to name calling!Real mature! And your real brave calling me names over the net. I know you would'nt do it to my face! Because, I'd drop you before you get the second word out of your mouth! And believe me my job is one of the most deadly jobs in the world! So going to Iraq would not faze me one bit! And how do the Republicans terrorize americans? Can you answer that without cussing?
Olberman is a lying POS...Bush CLEARLY never said Saddam was connected to the planning of 9/11...The guy even gives video proof to the fact. Olberman thinks people are too stupid to see it, unfortunately they are.
Yeah, well the Nazi's were working on Nuclear Weapons (this is actually documented, unlike today's 'Saddam is working on nukes' theory). Plus, the Japanese wouldn't have surrendered without this show of force. Most likely, a ground assult would have costs millions, of both Japanese and American lives.
I know a solution - let's just divide ourselves into sects and really attack each other. I mean, not just with words, but with guns and bombs. O, no, that won't happen, because Mr. Bush is "a uniter, not a divider." Never mind. What was I thinking.
I love how the oreilly supporters have nothing better to do than post about this video. What, tired of listening to the same old BS....thought you'd give a person who has the BALLS to stand up and call the shrub on his lies a try?
Ok, this Olberman guy is trying to talk to what, Two year olds? This guy was a Sportcaster? I guess he was always picked last in school, cause he is angry at himself for some reason. I feel sorry for him.
Count slowly from 1 to 1.6 million. That is how many Americans are watching Bill instead of Keith during the same time slot. So what is a low rated former sportscaster to do? Be extreme, for one. Tear apart a sitting President during war time. Show much more anger at the US than our enemies. Working? Nope.
"Sitting" being the operative word. He sat through 9/11. SAT during Katrina. Sits while his war based on lies is killing our military personnel. Sits and wire-taps people that don't follow his idiotic philosophies. Keith is absolutely correct. 1.6 million is probably closer to the number of lies O'Reilly hands out in the "No-Spin Zone" weekly.
People can say all they want to try to rationalize Bush and US plans/actions invading Iraq; the grounds on which this action took place have been proven to be a LIE.
To the Americans (does not matter democrate or republican): Your president plainly LIED to you! He lied you in a war that has cost thousands of lives and billions (more than 300) of dollars!
We've already killed 40,000 in Iraq. What's the acceptable ratio for killing innocents:al-qaida? When you have an terrorist in a home full of innocents, it's best to go in w/ a local police force, not an apache helicopter.
Amen. Feel free to bitch ladies and gentlemen but don't cast a stone against the government unless you have a solutions. Everyone is running around with their twisted fucked up opinions they get from their celebrity heroes and ignorant friends and coworkers. Ignorance is a disease. I am god damn sick and tired of stupid American citizens - it's you that is why I am moving to London not our government.
So many of you have the balls to bitch because a hand full of soldiers died in Iraq - guess what retards? It's a fucking war - people die. Guess what else? We have record low casualties. Instead of calling Bush names because some soldier probably died from mishandling a weapon, why don't you focus on yourselves. How many people hear about murders in the towns and cities you live in on a daily basis? Do you care about that? Of course not!
More people die from murders in our own country than soldiers in Iraq. Get your priorities straight. Don't ask for all of the details on a confidential report, don't you realize the terrorists watch CNN. It's not a closed US network, they know every thing we know. It's confidential for a reason dumb fucks. I'm so enraged and disgusted at so many people but I am glad to see people like altoidyoda and hokeyy standing up for what is right. Godbless.
Before you presume to know what you are talking about, just listen to a Marine who was in Afghanistan. You might shoot yourself in the nut because you don't know how to handle firearms, but to accuse an enlisted service member of being incompetent is stupid and speaks volumes of your true colors. And to weigh American lives in such a phrase as "It's a fucking war - people die." It's just plain disgusting. It is a free country, so feel free to leave.
...record-low casualties, record-low effectiveness. This argument needs to move off of how we got into this, and on to why we are ineffective in what we are trying to do. I think the answer is that Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, et al are a gang of bumbling maladroits. Step 1: get them OUT of power. You can't actually believe our military strategies are producing results. If you do, then you sir (or madam) are being duped by your own "celebrities".
You are a real masterpiece. Don't tell me where I get my opinions from. You may be right about the stupidity of the American public, though - look at the administration we have elected to represent us on the world stage. I would much prefer to believe that our two-party system, along with our electoral process, is completely broken.
I am leaving your free country - get a new line. I'm glad you weren't around in any wars a few decades back because we'd all be speaking German and the Jews would be gone.
Hokeyy - was Bush when he said "mission acomplished" about the Iraq invasion? - or when he said New Orleans was being dealt with? I wouldn't trust Bush with a lawnmower.
You Bush ass kissers and cry all you want. Bush implied it in his state of union address. Notice how high the ratings is on this video. Only cry babies like you complain.
I wonder if there is any connection between Keith Olberman almost french kissing Bill Clinton in an interview and demonizing the President of the United States ala Hugo Chavez?
GEE DUB is picking gnat poop out of pepper...yet again illustrating the need for this administration to take no responsibility for anything at all...this is like saying: We know Steinbrenner but not the Yanks...We know Boston but have never heard of the Red Sox...WE know football, but who is this 'Notre Dame' person...This nation needs to realize they have a bad person as president....forget Dems and Repubs, we simply need a new adminstration of people we all can trust..
Sep 8th, 2006. Senate Report Finds No Prewar Saddam-al-Qaida Ties. It discloses for the first time an October 2005 CIA assessment that prior to the war Saddam's government "did not have a relationship, harbor, or turn a blind eye toward Zarqawi and his associates."
The declassified document being released Friday by the Senate Intelligence Committee also explores the role that inaccurate information supplied by the anti-Saddam exile group the Iraqi National Congress had in the march to war.
Although they were involved with the criminal they were not directly involved with the murder of the officer. Maybe if they did not help him hide, he would have been caught before he killed that cop. They are not directly involved with the murder but they are being held accountable for helping him. Do you see what I am getting at?
I don't know what people will put together in there heads when they hear that. Here's another situation. I'm from Western New York, near Buffalo, and there is this guy who escaped from prison and over a few months he is accused of shooting 3 policeman, one died two days ago. He has been running from the police and staying with relatives. Anyone who has let him stay with them is being charged with crimes for assisting a criminal...
I don't know what people will put together in there heads when they hear that. Here's another situation. I'm from Western New York, near Buffalo, and there is this guy who escaped from prison and over a few months he is accused of shooting 3 policeman, one died two days ago. He has been running from the police and staying with relatives. Anyone who has let him stay with them is being charged with crimes for assisting a criminal...
In the first clip he says Saddam wasn't directly connected with the attacks on September 11th. In the second clip he talks about how Saddam (as leader of his country) WAS involved with terrorists. How does that contradict? Oh, I see, they do because the man on TV says they do.
Yeah, he said Saddam was involved with members of al-qaeda, but never said he was involved with the attacks on September 11th. I don't know what else he said in answering that guys question, but in the two clips Olberman showed there was no contradiction. Olberman said, he "insisted he never linked Al-Qaeda and Saddam" but Bush didn't say that in either clip, he put words in his mouth.
...helped out al'queda? The U.S. totally armed and financed Bin Laden, who then turned on the U.S, recognizing the U.S. and Russia as being equally interested in controlling Eastern oil. The CIA are the bkack hand of U,S, interest - murderers.
Its hilarious how aurax has no clue what he is talking about. What are the source of your facts? Where's your "cross-referencing"? Iraq had no operational tie to 9/11. That is a FACT. Determined by the 9/11 Commission and terrorism experts, such as Richard Clarke who worked for both Bush's, Reagan & Clinton as Terrorism Czar. Bush was even forced to admit this a years ago.
Oh and please don't let diferences of an opinion,split the power of our constitutional rights,and freedom of speech.Remember,respect(agree or disagree)comes first,that's the balance that keep us together in unity,and support our very essence of our democracy.May GOD bless us all,and help us,save us from the punishment of the opresor,and the burocrats.Let It Be.
By they'r fruits they will be judge.Guys don't worry it's just a matter of time,BUSH,CHENEY,(and all the gang),Husein,Bin Laden,Hezbolla,Taliban,and the rest of the people contributing in the killing of inoscent people(and any human),for something that cost less than life(for a cheap excuse),they will BURN IN HELL FOR EVER!,believe me they will pay,an to let you know, I'm not gonna be the one pointing a finger when that happens.
Wiki obviously has people on both sides reviewing and correcting facts about these issues. Yet you bring up right wing Worldnutdaily op-eds as your back up? What a joke. There was no operational tie between Saddam and Al Qaeda. This is what the 9/11 Commission found. Saddam was a secularist, he ran a secular government, something that Bin Laden is adamently opposed to.
Saddam was a monster who put 20,000 - 37,000 Iraqi's to death - monthly...MONTHLY... for years. He hosted the 9/11 terrorist and helped fund them. What's not to understand here?
Oh I get it...Wiki is only a good source when AuraX uses it, but not when somebody else uses it to dispute the opinions of WorldNutDaily. A recent investigative study by Nature Journal, one of the oldest and most reputable scientific journals, shows that Wiki comes close to Britannica in terms of the accuracy of its science entries. The average science entry in Wikipedia contained around four inaccuracies; Britannica, about three.
Come on, an on-line website that lets anyone off the street post whatever they want about any given topic is not factual. It's as simple as that. How anyone in their right mind could expect FACTS from Wikipedia is just beyond me. If you rely on Wik. exclusively without cross-referencing, you have no business quoting from it. I use wik. to ck out personalities mostly. When I need hard-facts about important issues I most definitely use other sources.
No thanks. I'll pass on your links. I've already heard enough on form both opinions. Those that are killing the Iraqi's and those that desperately want to be free from the the tyranic control over them and the slaughter of them, by the "other" Iraqi's. Thanks anyway.
Peer-reviewed, Fact-Sourced and stringently Neutral Wikipedia is more credible than the Biased and Opinion-based Worldnetdaily. Any objective person can see this.
Sorry, but you are wrong. Teachers librarians, REAL Encyclopedias all across the country have come out publicly denouncing Wikipedia. Schools have banned the use of it. Multiple class-action lawsuits are pending against Wiki's bias. Google "Wikipedia Complaints." See for yourself. There are hundreds. I still use it, I just know how to use it.
defend our country in iraq, michael moore, moveon.org crowd, i wish i was sean hannity. oh and technically i can't discredit you when you have none to start with. go ahead and try to continue splitting hairs trying to tie 911 with iraq, noone is buying your bullshit foxnews, medved, limbaugh, hannity, coulter, beck, reagan, prager, kristol, hume, ingraham, etc etc idiotic talking points.
Absolutely, defend our country in IRAQ. There's soooooo much you just don't know or simply don't understand. http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/printer- friendly.asp?ARTICLE_ID=34621 Comment on it.
i see your double posted with bad linkage of an article from a right wing website that is 3 years old written by a 17 year old and raise you to good old wiki....with facts!
You got something against 17 year olds? Ryan Mauro was a 17 y.o. prodigy when he wrote that article, considered the youngest geopolitical analyst in the United States. He is a G.A. with Northeast Intelligence Network and was hired as a geopolitical analyst by Tactical Defense Concepts, a maritime-related security company in 2002>
2)Also author of the book, "Death to America: The Unreported Battle of Iraq.", founder and owner of worldthreats.com. Today he is 21. Comment on the article. How day you say Wikipedia and FACTS in the same sentence. You wanna google, google Wikipedia...unreliable...inaccurate...not credible...class action law-suit...founder Jimmy Wales (Jimbo) Porn webmaster...Wikipedia is a tool not to be used as FACT - EVER.
3)Wikipedia = Anyone's bat, at re-writing hx. *I go there at least once a wk for one thing or another, but at least I know what I'm doing and know never to confuse THE FACTS with some wiki, biased re-edited, twisted half-truth of a plagiarized debacle.
We all help each other. It's what makes the world go round. Aren't we nice with our helping hands. Now reality: Sharing technology for strategic reasons is not the same as giving Saddam WMD, which isn't the case! USA never sold WMD to anybody! Stop listening to the Michael Moore's of the world. Wake up and defend your country. Learn the truth instead of spreading lies.
"There was never a direct connection between Saddam Hussein and 9/11." "We did say he is the state sponser of terror." Then he tries to burn him like the liberal idiot he is, and shows
"Saddam Hussein aids and protects members of Al Qaeda. Secretly without fingerprints he can provide weapons to terrorists or help them develope their own." Never said he ordered the attack just helps them.
Was Al Quaida in Iraq at all? Sure. Guess where else they were! Oops. Hey, let's bomb Florida, randomly imprison it's citizens, raid people's homes, accuse the governor of being related to the most dangerous man in the world, and be sure to spread around plenty of depleted uranium. That's what they get for harboring and training terrorists! Of course, we'll drop leaflets over Miami telling people to get out before we oblitarate it. It's the least we can do.
Ok, I'm all guessed out. Where? Saddam Hussein massacred hundreds of thousands. It was his great pleasure to systematically put thousands of Iraqi's to death - MONTHLY.
Sorry AuraX, but "Location: Worldwide" hardly connects Hussein to Bin Laden any more than it does, say, Bush to Bin Laden. And if Bush Laden is nothing more than a conspiracy theory, than guess what that makes of the Hussein connection.
Between 2000 and 2001, Iraqi intelligence had met several of the 9/11 hijackers. The Iraqi media, controlled by the Saddam regime, called for jihad against the US on Jan 22, 2001.>
Between Aug.19 - 21, 2001, Saddam Hussein hosted a forum for terrorists in Baghdad featuring not only bin laden's reps, but those of Islamic Jihad, Hammas, and MANY others- from this time until after 9/11, Saddam Hussein and members of his inner circle went to safehouses with the military on high alert! Not only did Saddam know about 9/11 he helped fund it.
If this was credible, Bush would be citing it. Not that he has a habit of using credible stories to back his policies, but it would be saving him a lot of embarrassment. So I suspect someone is pulling this out of their ass.
"al -Qaeda -founded in late 1980's. Established and led by Osama bin Laden. Location: Worldwide. Primary Goals: Establishment of worldwide Islamic rule, overthrow of non-islamic governments, expulsion of Western influences from Muslim state, killing of US Citizens." I got news for you, al-qaeda was already relevant in Iraq.
Yeah, like GWB has to tell you everything, every minute.This makes sense to me, I'm sure it won't to you but try. http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/printer-friendly.asp?ARTICLE_ID=34621
Where is the lie lefties?Do you dumb fucks understand the English language?Bush said Saddam had connections to terrorists,he did not say Saddam was connected to 9/11.
While it is true that in this video, there isn't a lie, you'd have to have had your head buried under a rock for the past few years to not know that Bush HAS denied a connection between Al-Queda and Sadaam, which would be a lie.
Bush uttered the statement "Until 911 people thought Saddam could be contained" He also said Saddam had ties to al Queada he did not. You republicans use dirty hateful language. That's why I call you the part of "Fear and Hate". I think I will change it to: "The Party of Ignorence, Fear and Hate"
Hmm, how odd: Proof that Bush lied about his implications of Saddam's ties to Al Qaeda, and not a single comment from conservatives about this video. I guess when you have no defense at all, it's best to hide from the facts - right, "Right" guys?
Its funny how G.W. DOUCHE sounds like porky pig when hes lieing.
chaosad09 1 year ago
Bush never said that Hussein directly ordered the 9/11 attacks.What he did say was Saddam protected terrorists, which turned out to be true.
MrBarbarbarian 2 years ago
wars on a hunch are awesome, yeah?
jevgai 2 years ago
@MrBarbarbarian It did these morons need to get a brain man!
mrcrazydudeful 2 years ago
lacking a LIFE of his own, this mass murderer destroys the one of OTHERS. a simple psychological thing. lock him away into the psychiatry, please!
garthamlockk 3 years ago
lacking a LIFE of his own, this mass murderer destroys the one of OTHERS. a simple psychological thing. lock him away into the psychiatry, please!
garthamlockk 3 years ago
look at tht fat old guy by the guy askin bush questions i can tell wut hes thinkin hes thinkin wut is this guy talkin about like a dumbass he obiously was there for a reason to learn, he really should be lookin up jenny craig in the phonebook some pilates or somethin fat fuck hahahahaha owned
kmksrh1275 3 years ago
Mr. Bush
lick my ballsack, and choke on cum, scumbag
octamethyl 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
hmmmm .. its another red-letter day for the terror-appeasing LIBERALS .. seems as though Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto was MURDERED today by one of the left's constituents. Keep your celebration brief fuckdrips .. cause in the end you're going down !
roscoe85cj 4 years ago
Ignore the UN
and invade Iraq
for ignoring the UN.
pathetic.
George Bush makes me ashamed to be an American.
medic914 4 years ago 6
bush is missing 3 letters from his name, l and i-t.
awwhellnogadammit 4 years ago
While I don't like to be picky, and I don't disagree with you...."bullshit" has 2 "L's" in it.
9 months to go, everybody!!!
DanielPaul56 3 years ago
yeah, he changed it again after everybody caught on to bulshit!
awwhellnogadammit 3 years ago
Keith: who are you and I kidding, majority rules. by the last account we had 59 million ignorant and careless people, and still counting. Majority rule does not mean democracy in many cases, it means tyranny. That is what we have in US now. Tyranny of evil minds in the government ignorance of their constituent. Therefore lie all you want what difference does it make?
delaraZarin 4 years ago
the difference it made is young men and wemon being murdered from this country and the middle east, half the people that joined the service thought they had to do it to stop them from nukeing us. Bush might as well have pulled the fucking trigger himself, GO FUCK YOURSELF BUSH ADMINISTRATION GO FUCK YOURSELF, they probably will never read that either bastards
kmksrh1275 3 years ago
Cable News Ratings for 2007.
"The largest decline was suffered by Greta Van Susteran's On The Record (-22%), followed closely by O'Reilly (-21%). Hannity & What's His Name took the Bronze (-17%). Of the MSNBC programs opposite those losers, Olbermann's Countdown was the biggest gainer (55%), which I'm sure doesn't bother O'Reilly at all."
W's dot dailykos dot com slash story slash 2006
neoKonscious 4 years ago
Keith, Bush said. "Sadaam Hussein protects terrorist, including members of AlQueda"! Where is it in the Bush's speech where he said Sadaam was responsible for 9/11? Maybe I am missing something! And of course Sadaam would support a group of terrorist that were successful in infiltrating the U.S. and causing so much death. What Bush was afraid of is Sadaam teaming up with Aqueda and giving them the WMD's that he used to kill thousands of Kurd's! Who does Keith think he's F---ing kidding?
unit441 5 years ago
MESSAGE TO ALL OF YOU BUSH HATERS! THE ISLAM RELIGION CALLS ON ALL THEIR FOLOWERS TO KILL EVERY ONE OF YOU PEOPLE TOO! What is happening in Iraq is that our troops are the bait for all the Radical Islams! And yes, that's is a good thing! Better our troops kill them in Iraq, then have to fight them on the streets here! For every 1 American G.I. they kill, our troops kill 25 terrorists! 25 to 1 kill ratio in our favor and people think were losing in Iraq!
unit441 5 years ago
Hey Ushit441, where the hell did you get that retarded idea. For every innocent Iraqi we kill how many "Terrorists" do we create. Oh and when are you going over there to be bait you 1/2 witted mother fucker. Oh and no matter how much you try to lie to yourself moron, we are losing because GW is the biggest fuck up to hold the office bar none.
NYSLOTMAN 5 years ago
Well, unlike you, I can make a point without calling people names. Real mature! If you didn't hate the military so much. All you would have to do is ask them what's happening in Iraq. They will tell you the exact opposite of what the Lib Media tells Americans!
unit441 5 years ago
I have a High School buddy who is now a Lt. Col in the Army, his on his 3rd tour in Iraq and says it's worse then ever.
NYSLOTMAN 5 years ago
'calling people names is immature' - you then proceed to call others 'terrorist supporters' 'iliterate' 'ignorant' 'immature' and part of a brainwashed collective by Dem/Lib media conspiracy. Name calling is perhaps ok when you do it? Guilty: of hypocrisy : of flawed ad hominem. But I don't feel sorry for you, I just find *your* ignorance & immaturity funny.
hoodidge 5 years ago
Someone that can only express themselves by telling someone to "fuck-off","you peice of shit","sucking dick" is plain and simple an ignorant person. Calling someone ignorant is not in any way the same as using those words! "Ignorant" is not a curse word Hoodidge. And if you think it is, I FEEL SORRY FOR YOU! Unlike Dems in here, I can articulate my position on the issues without cursing! And where did I write the word "brainwashed"? If your going to slam me, please don't lie about what I write!
unit441 5 years ago
Why don't you just admit it. Your on the Terrorists side! Your so partisan that you want to see the U.S. lose the war for your Dem Party! Oh sad! No, how scary! I don't like Clinton, but I would back him if our troops are in harms way if he was still the prez!
unit441 5 years ago
Fuck off you piece of shit, if I was on the terrorists side I would be trying to scare people like your sorry ass is doing.
Yea right I'm sure you'd back Clinton if he got us into this total nightmare in Iraq.
NYSLOTMAN 5 years ago
Case closed, you cannot make an intelligent point without using foul language! I feel sorry for you!
unit441 5 years ago
If the majority of New Yorkers are as ignorant as you. It clearly explains why New Yorkers like Hillary Clinton!I want to Thank You NYSLOT for enlightening me on the true ignorance of New Yorkers! Now you can go ahead and call me all kinds of foul language, as I now understand your ignorance! By the way, "ignorance" is not foul language! Now go back to praising AKBAR! And no, I won't explain what akbar means to you!
unit441 5 years ago
EVERY single war in history is a "total nightmare"! Do you think the G.I.'s in WW2 were just having a blast storming the beaches of Normandy and Iwo Jima? You are the perfect example of what Democratic Leaders want from Americans. I bunch of ignorant, illiterate people like you that cannot care for themselves without the Goverment! By the way, is there any Dem in here that can articulate thier position without name calling?
unit441 5 years ago
I wonder how many innocent Iraqi's are killed comapred to every American GI.. Can you post the website where you found your numbers? How do you know they were "terrorists"? Did Fox no-news tell you that??
jessi429 4 years ago
There is no way that I could possibly respond to your ridiculous thought process in 500 letters. Besides, its obvious that you think the U.S are the "bad guys" in this War. Since you feel that way, you and I will NEVER agree on anything about this war. I beleive it is necessary and you don't! And they don't allow enough space for me to properly tell you why your wrong!
B1065 4 years ago
"If your still pro-bush then you need to take your head out of your ass."
yervan007 3 years ago
Has Olberman converted to Islam? Jeez, the way this guy talks about our President sure makes me think he has! He talks alot of shit, but does not give any solutions on how we fight Radical Terrorist that are going to bring to the USA what they do to Israel! That is terrorists strapping bombs to themselves and going into crowed places! Wake up people these Islams are dead serios about wiping us off the map. And it seems like the only people who know it ae Republicans!
unit441 5 years ago
Yea right Ushit441, the Republicans are the Terrorists helpers. They try to terrorize the American people everyday and it has worked on your pathedic pussy ass. Go whine about the media and the Dems all you want they're going to kick some ass now.
NYSLOTMAN 5 years ago
What, can't make an intelligent point,so you resort to name calling!Real mature! And your real brave calling me names over the net. I know you would'nt do it to my face! Because, I'd drop you before you get the second word out of your mouth! And believe me my job is one of the most deadly jobs in the world! So going to Iraq would not faze me one bit! And how do the Republicans terrorize americans? Can you answer that without cussing?
unit441 5 years ago
Deadly job my ass, sucking GW's dick can't be that dangerous. So when are you joining Rambut, they need you over there.
NYSLOTMAN 5 years ago
Mulhollandose: are you arguing with yourself? O_o
shallowman 5 years ago
Olberman is a lying POS...Bush CLEARLY never said Saddam was connected to the planning of 9/11...The guy even gives video proof to the fact. Olberman thinks people are too stupid to see it, unfortunately they are.
mulhollanddose 5 years ago
George Bush is a liar!!!!
osmosis1988 5 years ago
The devil came in sheep's clothing.
collegeboy02 5 years ago
Yeah, well the Nazi's were working on Nuclear Weapons (this is actually documented, unlike today's 'Saddam is working on nukes' theory). Plus, the Japanese wouldn't have surrendered without this show of force. Most likely, a ground assult would have costs millions, of both Japanese and American lives.
OnePK 5 years ago
"Ok, this Olberman guy is trying to talk to what, Two year olds?"
or, George Bush.
same thing
popcultureicon 5 years ago
hajahajahah, the ending was so great. who da fuck does he think he's kiddin?
migso 5 years ago
...and growing daily thanks to Dubya.
markdask 5 years ago
Olberman is a stud. I'd vote for him and Daily for Pres and VP any day of the week.
Atlas1970 5 years ago
I know a solution - let's just divide ourselves into sects and really attack each other. I mean, not just with words, but with guns and bombs. O, no, that won't happen, because Mr. Bush is "a uniter, not a divider." Never mind. What was I thinking.
glgengel 5 years ago
The "No Spin Zone"? Give me a break. All the right wingers and herds of ship that watch O'Reilly need him to give them their opinions.
camdog1 5 years ago
I love how the oreilly supporters have nothing better to do than post about this video. What, tired of listening to the same old BS....thought you'd give a person who has the BALLS to stand up and call the shrub on his lies a try?
sportsguyblowschunks 5 years ago
Bush, his regime, and all the citizens who continue to support him are excellent practitioners of "Doublethink".
spiderbass69 5 years ago
my fellowe amerivcans i am an asshole
extremekiller22 5 years ago
I think I have a new hero.... and, It's not G. W. Shrub.
toddrickvonmelvin 5 years ago
Ok, this Olberman guy is trying to talk to what, Two year olds? This guy was a Sportcaster? I guess he was always picked last in school, cause he is angry at himself for some reason. I feel sorry for him.
kurbsyde 5 years ago
Olberman was a sportscaster, sure. Bush was a cheerleader.
squirc 5 years ago
Yes most people with a Bachelor of Science degree in communications arts from Cornell University talk to two year olds as well as everyone else.
Aku51 5 years ago
"Ok, this Olberman guy is trying to talk to what, Two year olds?"
Ok, this Olberman guy is trying to talk to what, George W. Bush?
popcultureicon 5 years ago
aww..thats a cute comeback.
italianealy 5 years ago
So he should get off because he mislead the american people into a war instead of outright lying to them?
oolong2 5 years ago
Are you really that dense? Olberman proves in this clip that the justification was Saddam's undeniable links to al qaeda.
mulhollanddose 5 years ago
great rationale: more people watch oreilly, so he must be right!
jevgai 5 years ago
No, Olberman is an ass, so less people watch him. You had it close, but backwards
indyjim1969 5 years ago
yeah thats why britney spears is a great musician !
miballz 5 years ago
Count slowly from 1 to 1.6 million. That is how many Americans are watching Bill instead of Keith during the same time slot. So what is a low rated former sportscaster to do? Be extreme, for one. Tear apart a sitting President during war time. Show much more anger at the US than our enemies. Working? Nope.
indyjim1969 5 years ago
"Sitting" being the operative word. He sat through 9/11. SAT during Katrina. Sits while his war based on lies is killing our military personnel. Sits and wire-taps people that don't follow his idiotic philosophies. Keith is absolutely correct. 1.6 million is probably closer to the number of lies O'Reilly hands out in the "No-Spin Zone" weekly.
tiovince 5 years ago
after searching for five minutes:
o'reilly=350,000 viewers nightly
olbermann=240,000 viewers nightly
daily show (3 hours later)=1.8 million viewers nightly
nbc nightly news=10 million nightly
ass.
theucharist 5 years ago
What does ratings have to do with the fact that George Bush lied ?
Aku51 5 years ago
People can say all they want to try to rationalize Bush and US plans/actions invading Iraq; the grounds on which this action took place have been proven to be a LIE.
To the Americans (does not matter democrate or republican): Your president plainly LIED to you! He lied you in a war that has cost thousands of lives and billions (more than 300) of dollars!
Wake up!
clowdsarefun 5 years ago
We've already killed 40,000 in Iraq. What's the acceptable ratio for killing innocents:al-qaida? When you have an terrorist in a home full of innocents, it's best to go in w/ a local police force, not an apache helicopter.
Realist22 5 years ago
Ditto AuraX he/she is right.
hokeyy 5 years ago
Why do so many people defend this idiot? Better yet, why did so many vote for him?
amycasey2 5 years ago
So many of us defend him because he is right. So many voted for him because he is strong. It shouldn't be rocket science to come to that conclusion.
hokeyy 5 years ago
Amen. Feel free to bitch ladies and gentlemen but don't cast a stone against the government unless you have a solutions. Everyone is running around with their twisted fucked up opinions they get from their celebrity heroes and ignorant friends and coworkers. Ignorance is a disease. I am god damn sick and tired of stupid American citizens - it's you that is why I am moving to London not our government.
ryankenward 5 years ago
So many of you have the balls to bitch because a hand full of soldiers died in Iraq - guess what retards? It's a fucking war - people die. Guess what else? We have record low casualties. Instead of calling Bush names because some soldier probably died from mishandling a weapon, why don't you focus on yourselves. How many people hear about murders in the towns and cities you live in on a daily basis? Do you care about that? Of course not!
ryankenward 5 years ago
More people die from murders in our own country than soldiers in Iraq. Get your priorities straight. Don't ask for all of the details on a confidential report, don't you realize the terrorists watch CNN. It's not a closed US network, they know every thing we know. It's confidential for a reason dumb fucks. I'm so enraged and disgusted at so many people but I am glad to see people like altoidyoda and hokeyy standing up for what is right. Godbless.
ryankenward 5 years ago
...yes, god bless you and your violent, hateful, vulgar souls. Jesus loves you all and would approve.
laffable 5 years ago
Before you presume to know what you are talking about, just listen to a Marine who was in Afghanistan. You might shoot yourself in the nut because you don't know how to handle firearms, but to accuse an enlisted service member of being incompetent is stupid and speaks volumes of your true colors. And to weigh American lives in such a phrase as "It's a fucking war - people die." It's just plain disgusting. It is a free country, so feel free to leave.
amycasey2 5 years ago
...record-low casualties, record-low effectiveness. This argument needs to move off of how we got into this, and on to why we are ineffective in what we are trying to do. I think the answer is that Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, et al are a gang of bumbling maladroits. Step 1: get them OUT of power. You can't actually believe our military strategies are producing results. If you do, then you sir (or madam) are being duped by your own "celebrities".
laffable 5 years ago
You are a real masterpiece. Don't tell me where I get my opinions from. You may be right about the stupidity of the American public, though - look at the administration we have elected to represent us on the world stage. I would much prefer to believe that our two-party system, along with our electoral process, is completely broken.
laffable 5 years ago
By right, you mean all of though WMD's we found in Iraq?
amycasey2 5 years ago
By the way, just look at his approval ratings. That doesn't take rocket science either?
amycasey2 5 years ago
I am leaving your free country - get a new line. I'm glad you weren't around in any wars a few decades back because we'd all be speaking German and the Jews would be gone.
ryankenward 5 years ago
Well put, now go away.
amycasey2 5 years ago
I wanted to comment on this but... I just... ah, forget it.
laffable 5 years ago
Hokeyy - was Bush when he said "mission acomplished" about the Iraq invasion? - or when he said New Orleans was being dealt with? I wouldn't trust Bush with a lawnmower.
markdask 5 years ago
Indeed
hell I wouldnt trust Bush with dental floss
bezerker4828 5 years ago
wew
mutesaja 5 years ago
Because stupid dumbass Americans are too busy filling up their SUV's gas tanks....that's why....fucking idiots.
Nozferat 5 years ago
You Bush ass kissers and cry all you want. Bush implied it in his state of union address. Notice how high the ratings is on this video. Only cry babies like you complain.
robertangel30 5 years ago
I wonder if there is any connection between Keith Olberman almost french kissing Bill Clinton in an interview and demonizing the President of the United States ala Hugo Chavez?
captbosco 5 years ago
That's right all liberals and Dems that want to impeach Clinton. As Bush said(no lie) Saddam Hussein never directly ordered the attacks on 9/11.
retrorocker72 5 years ago
GEE DUB is picking gnat poop out of pepper...yet again illustrating the need for this administration to take no responsibility for anything at all...this is like saying: We know Steinbrenner but not the Yanks...We know Boston but have never heard of the Red Sox...WE know football, but who is this 'Notre Dame' person...This nation needs to realize they have a bad person as president....forget Dems and Repubs, we simply need a new adminstration of people we all can trust..
imperialprobe6969 5 years ago
word, we should invade another irrelevant country
jevgai 5 years ago
Sep 8th, 2006. Senate Report Finds No Prewar Saddam-al-Qaida Ties. It discloses for the first time an October 2005 CIA assessment that prior to the war Saddam's government "did not have a relationship, harbor, or turn a blind eye toward Zarqawi and his associates."
The declassified document being released Friday by the Senate Intelligence Committee also explores the role that inaccurate information supplied by the anti-Saddam exile group the Iraqi National Congress had in the march to war.
Subbacultcha 5 years ago
So Osama Bin Laden was hiding in Iraq, apparently.
Subbacultcha 5 years ago
Although they were involved with the criminal they were not directly involved with the murder of the officer. Maybe if they did not help him hide, he would have been caught before he killed that cop. They are not directly involved with the murder but they are being held accountable for helping him. Do you see what I am getting at?
altoidyoda 5 years ago
you're getting at "aiding and abetting". A charge you could only extrapolate from the evidence if your source was Fox News.
Realist22 5 years ago
I don't know what people will put together in there heads when they hear that. Here's another situation. I'm from Western New York, near Buffalo, and there is this guy who escaped from prison and over a few months he is accused of shooting 3 policeman, one died two days ago. He has been running from the police and staying with relatives. Anyone who has let him stay with them is being charged with crimes for assisting a criminal...
altoidyoda 5 years ago
I don't know what people will put together in there heads when they hear that. Here's another situation. I'm from Western New York, near Buffalo, and there is this guy who escaped from prison and over a few months he is accused of shooting 3 policeman, one died two days ago. He has been running from the police and staying with relatives. Anyone who has let him stay with them is being charged with crimes for assisting a criminal...
altoidyoda 5 years ago
In the first clip he says Saddam wasn't directly connected with the attacks on September 11th. In the second clip he talks about how Saddam (as leader of his country) WAS involved with terrorists. How does that contradict? Oh, I see, they do because the man on TV says they do.
altoidyoda 5 years ago
you forgot the "including members of al qaeda" part
jevgai 5 years ago
Yeah, he said Saddam was involved with members of al-qaeda, but never said he was involved with the attacks on September 11th. I don't know what else he said in answering that guys question, but in the two clips Olberman showed there was no contradiction. Olberman said, he "insisted he never linked Al-Qaeda and Saddam" but Bush didn't say that in either clip, he put words in his mouth.
altoidyoda 5 years ago
so you say that saying someone was involved with al-qaeda doesn't plant the seed that they were involved with 911? hm ok.
jevgai 5 years ago
he was involved with al-qaeda in the sence he was fighting against it because he saw it as a threat, get your history straight. hmm ok?
solostash200 5 years ago
um yeah, i don't think that's what bush meant. i agree with you, we helped out al-qaeda in iraq.
jevgai 5 years ago
...helped out al'queda? The U.S. totally armed and financed Bin Laden, who then turned on the U.S, recognizing the U.S. and Russia as being equally interested in controlling Eastern oil. The CIA are the bkack hand of U,S, interest - murderers.
markdask 5 years ago
Bush never made the connection between 9/11 and Saddam, just like Clinton never had sex with that woman, just, er, oral sex...
gadflyzzz 5 years ago
why are you suprised he's always f-ing lying.
trexx32 5 years ago
its good to see people finally waking up to the reality..
trolldenorte 5 years ago
Its hilarious how aurax has no clue what he is talking about. What are the source of your facts? Where's your "cross-referencing"? Iraq had no operational tie to 9/11. That is a FACT. Determined by the 9/11 Commission and terrorism experts, such as Richard Clarke who worked for both Bush's, Reagan & Clinton as Terrorism Czar. Bush was even forced to admit this a years ago.
Subbacultcha 5 years ago
Bush said there was no connection just last week!
bluevision 5 years ago
olberman is the man. HIm and John Stewart are awesome.
krayzgerman 5 years ago
Oh and please don't let diferences of an opinion,split the power of our constitutional rights,and freedom of speech.Remember,respect(agree or disagree)comes first,that's the balance that keep us together in unity,and support our very essence of our democracy.May GOD bless us all,and help us,save us from the punishment of the opresor,and the burocrats.Let It Be.
1alopezpr 5 years ago
By they'r fruits they will be judge.Guys don't worry it's just a matter of time,BUSH,CHENEY,(and all the gang),Husein,Bin Laden,Hezbolla,Taliban,and the rest of the people contributing in the killing of inoscent people(and any human),for something that cost less than life(for a cheap excuse),they will BURN IN HELL FOR EVER!,believe me they will pay,an to let you know, I'm not gonna be the one pointing a finger when that happens.
1alopezpr 5 years ago
Wiki obviously has people on both sides reviewing and correcting facts about these issues. Yet you bring up right wing Worldnutdaily op-eds as your back up? What a joke. There was no operational tie between Saddam and Al Qaeda. This is what the 9/11 Commission found. Saddam was a secularist, he ran a secular government, something that Bin Laden is adamently opposed to.
Subbacultcha 5 years ago
Saddam was a monster who put 20,000 - 37,000 Iraqi's to death - monthly...MONTHLY... for years. He hosted the 9/11 terrorist and helped fund them. What's not to understand here?
AuraX 5 years ago
holy jesus, you're a lying sack of shit
jevgai 5 years ago
congratuations for managing to cram all that shit down your throat. go polish cheney's balls, smart guy.
sluggo243 5 years ago
Not sure about the 9/11 connection. But he did fund terorism and he did kill many iraq citizens.
Saddam was a mad man and thinkfully he is gone.
publicposter 5 years ago
yah, and our Saudi allies also funded them and to this day STILL fund terror groups. why don't we go in their and create a chasm of power as well?
iamnature 5 years ago
Oh I get it...Wiki is only a good source when AuraX uses it, but not when somebody else uses it to dispute the opinions of WorldNutDaily. A recent investigative study by Nature Journal, one of the oldest and most reputable scientific journals, shows that Wiki comes close to Britannica in terms of the accuracy of its science entries. The average science entry in Wikipedia contained around four inaccuracies; Britannica, about three.
Subbacultcha 5 years ago
Come on, an on-line website that lets anyone off the street post whatever they want about any given topic is not factual. It's as simple as that. How anyone in their right mind could expect FACTS from Wikipedia is just beyond me. If you rely on Wik. exclusively without cross-referencing, you have no business quoting from it. I use wik. to ck out personalities mostly. When I need hard-facts about important issues I most definitely use other sources.
AuraX 5 years ago
aurax: putting everything into two false black and whites since 1993 (i am assuming you are 13).
jevgai 5 years ago
AuraX, why don't you look at what an actual Iraqi thinks about Saddam's cruelty versus the new cruelty.
http://riverbendblog.blogspot.com/
http://raedinthemiddle.blogspot.com/
http://dailywarnews.blogspot.com/
pomafiwo 5 years ago
No thanks. I'll pass on your links. I've already heard enough on form both opinions. Those that are killing the Iraqi's and those that desperately want to be free from the the tyranic control over them and the slaughter of them, by the "other" Iraqi's. Thanks anyway.
AuraX 5 years ago
passing on links, taking a pass on knowledge. That's willfull ignorance.
pomafiwo 5 years ago
Peer-reviewed, Fact-Sourced and stringently Neutral Wikipedia is more credible than the Biased and Opinion-based Worldnetdaily. Any objective person can see this.
Subbacultcha 5 years ago
Sorry, but you are wrong. Teachers librarians, REAL Encyclopedias all across the country have come out publicly denouncing Wikipedia. Schools have banned the use of it. Multiple class-action lawsuits are pending against Wiki's bias. Google "Wikipedia Complaints." See for yourself. There are hundreds. I still use it, I just know how to use it.
AuraX 5 years ago
And the united states commited probably the worlds worst act of terrorism when the nuclear bombs where dropped on Japan, on civilians.
seraph101 5 years ago
Bush saw to it that 3000 americans died on 9/11.
seraph101 5 years ago
defend our country in iraq, michael moore, moveon.org crowd, i wish i was sean hannity. oh and technically i can't discredit you when you have none to start with. go ahead and try to continue splitting hairs trying to tie 911 with iraq, noone is buying your bullshit foxnews, medved, limbaugh, hannity, coulter, beck, reagan, prager, kristol, hume, ingraham, etc etc idiotic talking points.
jevgai 5 years ago
Absolutely, defend our country in IRAQ. There's soooooo much you just don't know or simply don't understand. http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/printer- friendly.asp?ARTICLE_ID=34621 Comment on it.
AuraX 5 years ago
i see your double posted with bad linkage of an article from a right wing website that is 3 years old written by a 17 year old and raise you to good old wiki....with facts!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saddam_Hussein_and_al-Qaeda
come on reply to me with some more junk, hard-right links. how about some 2002 newsmax articles or townhall.com blogs. that would be awesome.
jevgai 5 years ago
You got something against 17 year olds? Ryan Mauro was a 17 y.o. prodigy when he wrote that article, considered the youngest geopolitical analyst in the United States. He is a G.A. with Northeast Intelligence Network and was hired as a geopolitical analyst by Tactical Defense Concepts, a maritime-related security company in 2002>
AuraX 5 years ago
2)Also author of the book, "Death to America: The Unreported Battle of Iraq.", founder and owner of worldthreats.com. Today he is 21. Comment on the article. How day you say Wikipedia and FACTS in the same sentence. You wanna google, google Wikipedia...unreliable...inaccurate...not credible...class action law-suit...founder Jimmy Wales (Jimbo) Porn webmaster...Wikipedia is a tool not to be used as FACT - EVER.
AuraX 5 years ago
3)Wikipedia = Anyone's bat, at re-writing hx. *I go there at least once a wk for one thing or another, but at least I know what I'm doing and know never to confuse THE FACTS with some wiki, biased re-edited, twisted half-truth of a plagiarized debacle.
AuraX 5 years ago
ok great, but all his claims are for naught. if that's the best you can do, an article from 2003 of right wing conspiracy, i feel sorry for you.
jevgai 5 years ago
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/printer- friendly.asp?ARTICLE_ID=34621 Comment on it. *Remove space before "friendly" for link to work.
AuraX 5 years ago
you posted that 3 times now. is hoping for the rapture getting you all absent minded?
jevgai 5 years ago
We all help each other. It's what makes the world go round. Aren't we nice with our helping hands. Now reality: Sharing technology for strategic reasons is not the same as giving Saddam WMD, which isn't the case! USA never sold WMD to anybody! Stop listening to the Michael Moore's of the world. Wake up and defend your country. Learn the truth instead of spreading lies.
AuraX 5 years ago
What the hell are you talking about, jevgai. Jeez, arm yourself with some facts before you try and discredit others statements.
AuraX 5 years ago
Listen carefully.
"There was never a direct connection between Saddam Hussein and 9/11." "We did say he is the state sponser of terror." Then he tries to burn him like the liberal idiot he is, and shows
"Saddam Hussein aids and protects members of Al Qaeda. Secretly without fingerprints he can provide weapons to terrorists or help them develope their own." Never said he ordered the attack just helps them.
DougElliott4 5 years ago
Was Al Quaida in Iraq at all? Sure. Guess where else they were! Oops. Hey, let's bomb Florida, randomly imprison it's citizens, raid people's homes, accuse the governor of being related to the most dangerous man in the world, and be sure to spread around plenty of depleted uranium. That's what they get for harboring and training terrorists! Of course, we'll drop leaflets over Miami telling people to get out before we oblitarate it. It's the least we can do.
pomafiwo 5 years ago
Ok, I'm all guessed out. Where? Saddam Hussein massacred hundreds of thousands. It was his great pleasure to systematically put thousands of Iraqi's to death - MONTHLY.
AuraX 5 years ago
Sorry AuraX, but "Location: Worldwide" hardly connects Hussein to Bin Laden any more than it does, say, Bush to Bin Laden. And if Bush Laden is nothing more than a conspiracy theory, than guess what that makes of the Hussein connection.
pomafiwo 5 years ago
Aides and protects is not the same as HE GAVE THE ORDER!!! He made that clear! Duh. Proof, Anti-Bush bias.
AuraX 5 years ago
Between 2000 and 2001, Iraqi intelligence had met several of the 9/11 hijackers. The Iraqi media, controlled by the Saddam regime, called for jihad against the US on Jan 22, 2001.>
AuraX 5 years ago
Between Aug.19 - 21, 2001, Saddam Hussein hosted a forum for terrorists in Baghdad featuring not only bin laden's reps, but those of Islamic Jihad, Hammas, and MANY others- from this time until after 9/11, Saddam Hussein and members of his inner circle went to safehouses with the military on high alert! Not only did Saddam know about 9/11 he helped fund it.
AuraX 5 years ago
If this was credible, Bush would be citing it. Not that he has a habit of using credible stories to back his policies, but it would be saving him a lot of embarrassment. So I suspect someone is pulling this out of their ass.
pomafiwo 5 years ago
You would. Oh, how you just would think that.
AuraX 5 years ago
"al -Qaeda -founded in late 1980's. Established and led by Osama bin Laden. Location: Worldwide. Primary Goals: Establishment of worldwide Islamic rule, overthrow of non-islamic governments, expulsion of Western influences from Muslim state, killing of US Citizens." I got news for you, al-qaeda was already relevant in Iraq.
AuraX 5 years ago
Yeah, like GWB has to tell you everything, every minute.This makes sense to me, I'm sure it won't to you but try. http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/printer-friendly.asp?ARTICLE_ID=34621
AuraX 5 years ago
Oh, ok, so your idol president got it wrong then huh?
mr5elfde5truct 5 years ago
Where is the lie lefties?Do you dumb fucks understand the English language?Bush said Saddam had connections to terrorists,he did not say Saddam was connected to 9/11.
smooth1nz 5 years ago
While it is true that in this video, there isn't a lie, you'd have to have had your head buried under a rock for the past few years to not know that Bush HAS denied a connection between Al-Queda and Sadaam, which would be a lie.
ryandallion 5 years ago
Saddam's connections to al qaeda is fact...what you would be doing is lying.
mulhollanddose 5 years ago
Bush uttered the statement "Until 911 people thought Saddam could be contained" He also said Saddam had ties to al Queada he did not. You republicans use dirty hateful language. That's why I call you the part of "Fear and Hate". I think I will change it to: "The Party of Ignorence, Fear and Hate"
mitchmanTX 5 years ago
bush iz da biggest liar in dis whole worldd...
n 1 day he will get punish by Allah (s.w.t)
mujaahid 5 years ago
Don't believe this for a moment EVILgelicals remeber the 'good' book and he's one of you. god talks to him hahahahahahahaya
metalinstatic 5 years ago
Hmm, how odd: Proof that Bush lied about his implications of Saddam's ties to Al Qaeda, and not a single comment from conservatives about this video. I guess when you have no defense at all, it's best to hide from the facts - right, "Right" guys?
JohnHinckley 5 years ago
Don't believe this for a moment EVILgelicals remeber the 'good' book and he's one of you. god talks to him hahahahahahahaya
metalinstatic 5 years ago