matter is the same as anti matter, just the opposite charge i dont know what he is talking about when he said it has large amounts of energy, same as normal matter.
Could a heavier antimatter atom like Antiplutonium for exapmle, annihilate with more energy than something like Antihydrogen? And is the annihilation destructive to what ever is near it?
wtf is this guy talking about antimatter contains the same fucking amount as energy as matter. THIS GUY IS SO FUCKING STUPID STUPID STUPID FUCKING STUPID STUPID FUCKING SO STUPID FUCK STUPID STUPID AND MORE STUPID FUCK STUPID STUPID SHIT this guy is so old and yet has no firm grasp on what the fucking shit he is saying.
For 1, antimatter is no more explosive than normal matter, like bbsonjohn said, sort of. And for 2, it looks exactly the same, if this video is to explain antimatter, you might want to show it realistically and just have a label saying "This bit is the antimatter bit" instead of making it look completely exotic. I could do better than this, if I had any skill with making videos, which I don't.
So what is an anti neutron??? + because an anti electron is the opposite won't it just be a proton and if u put the particles together won't it be regular matter without the exeption of the anti neutron?????
@TEHspazGUY I believe an anti neutron has got a negative mass, and as far as I know the anti electron won't be the same as an proton because it doesn't consist of the same quarks and therefor got way different mass.
@Mattias01001010 So 1kg of neutron + 1kg of antineutron = nothing (0kg of substances)?
It does not. 1kg of neutron + 1kg of antineutron = 2kg of energy. Antimatters has positive masses like matters.
Hence, antimatter-matter do not obliterate each other. Rather they produce energy with mass the same as the original sum of masses. Also, the energy themselves can create matter and antimatter pairs.So,
@bbsonjohn Sry I'm not a pro on this subject, thats way I added "I believe" :) and I see your point with the negative + postive = 0.. Althought I do remember I've read something like that :O They took the square root of mass and yeah
@IamBread18 yes, but in order to release its energy we must remove is sturcuture, thus how what animatter does They annialate each other releasing their energy
@tubewinkle yes, but the only way to unlock the full energy of matter is through using antimatter. Matter is essentially inert otherwise. The same can be said about antimatter.
An ounce of antimatter would reshape the planet. A piece of antimatter the mass of a paperclip could level New York city. An ounce of it would make the Earth uninhabitable.
Well, duuuuh, if we could use the energy of 1 pound of normal fucking matter at rest, we could power the United States for 2 days as well. Energy of a mass at rest is mc². Means it has enough power to do that. But try to convert that mass directly into energy, I wanna see these morons do that :P
so 2.1 gram would be about a 100 kilo ton nuclear weapon (any larger and the energy would be blasted out into space so about 2 grams is alll you would ever want to have for military use)
ps US gov i have no U or Pu to make any so please leave me alone
@dimaxxxx Antimatter would cause to much collateral damage, it's not magic. Same reason we use regular guns instead of grenade launchers, plus there's the cost of them.
I thought that Anti-Matter was just a theory, used to explain how the Universe contains so little matter, yet is still able to not collapse on itself.
@nerradmw Well, it's not matter, but it's not extremely unstable energy. Why does everyone assume antimatter is the dangerous one, when matter is just as much to blame? An antimatter universe would be the same as ours, there's actually no reason to think our regular matter is special. If there was a species of antimatter aliens, they'd think WE were the weird ones.
@nerradmw Matter is high-density energy, in a way. It makes just as much sense to say water is condensed steam, in the same way. So yeah, you're creating matter, but it's really just converting energy, you're not gaining or losing anything in the long run.
dont forget its very VERY hard to contain anti-mater, as soon as it touches matter they destroy each other. so how on earth can we contain anti-matter
@260830107 Maybe they could try to copy a ghost, and hold it without touching it, in space? After all, I don't think there is matter in space, maybe yes if you count meteoroids and dust particles, but just space by itself without ANYTHING is...well.. uh.....I dunno.... Say....what do you think happens when antimatter touches dark matter or energy? O_O
@chikiwiki64 If you could make anti-dark matter (I'd just call it light matter, even though it's still just as dark, appearance-wise), then you could annihilate that like ordinary matter. If you don't have any light matter, regular antimatter won't do anything more than what matter would do :P
Also I doubt you can really *touch* dark energy, and you can't make an antimatter form of it, though depending on what dark energy really is, gravity might oppose it :P
@CallumS319 If you started with a chunk of anti-matter in a near vacuum the remaining particles of matter would come in contact with the anti-matter and be annihilated. Assuming the container is strong enough to withstand the "tiny" releases of energy when these particles are destroyed, you would eventually end up with a perfect vacuum, other then the lump of remaining anti-matter in the container.
@sbalogh53 Still wouldn't be a perfect vacuum, since you can only annihilate the antiparticles of what you contain, and new particles like neutrinos would be constantly floating around. I don't think you can annihilate photons either, and that's not even going into quantum things like virtual particles.
@260830107 A penning trap wouldn't work for larger quantities, due to the exclusion principle. But there are other methods, though not as energy efficient.
@260830107 At CERN they now accomplished to retain it for about 15 minutes using some sort of field (not a magnetic field since they retained anti-hydrogen).
@260830107 someone could ivent some sort of gravitational suspension system or 'anti-grav' to suspend the particled in a vacuum and control the enegrgy released by reducing the suspension, although until we do that, we're kinda stuck
Ok so only a....lets say...... Iron matter.....If Iron matter and Anti-Iron matter come together they destroy each other so thats exactly why this is stupid cause it depends on the TYPE of anti-matter, only Iron matter and anti-iron matter can destroy each other or anti-H2O matter can destroy each other do you people understand now?
@m0mchil0 I know what you mean, but I'd like to clarify for others: All normal matter (Air, water, your mother, etc.) can annihilate the same sort of antimatter, because it's all made of simpler particles with simple opposites. Anti-potatoes can theoretically annihilate your sandwich, for example. However, an electron can't destroy an anti-proton, because the electron and the anti-proton (Or its parts, specifically) are completely different particles. It's... Kind of hard to explain here :P
@slowpoke152 like i said, the annihilation process goes down to the elemental particles (electron-pozitron, proton-antiproton) in that order. You're right, a pozitron can't annihilate a proton. But, in the more complex system, theoretically an anti-dick can destroy your mother (sorry about that, but I couldn't resist to reply to the mother mention before :P). It's all a bit of a mind gag...
An anti-dick could destroy a whole lot more than my mother :P It'd have to be pretty damned big to fully annihilate her though. Like, Chuck Norris scale.
grrrreat there is no danger than :) wonderful but hence they can use it for an easy population reduction right hmmmm welll that wold be a clean up yeo they should play more nways whats trillions anyways just paper to print ups
@TheDaftpunk02 According to my calculations, 1 pound of antimatter is about 650 times the power of the bomb dropped on Hiroshima. In other words, it's a hell of a lot, but nowhere near enough to crack a planet.
@TheDaftpunk02 According to one website (No it's not Wikipedia :P) you'd need 25,000,000,000,000 tons of antimatter to overcome the escape velocity for every single bit of Earth there is :P
You'd need substantially less to blow it up temporarily, but then it'd all just collapse back together due to gravity. This won't destroy Earth, but you'd kill and destroy everything on it, which is usually sufficient. Also, that previous number is accounting for all the energy you'd lose from inefficiencies.
Mass is the bases for all Matter, and Mass is Energy or Vice Vs Energy is Mass AKA "Mass Energy Equivalence or E=Mc^2", and conservation laws insist that "Energy" or "Mass" cant be destroyed nor created.. In other words you cant have zero or less than zero energy or mass, and therefore you cant have zero matter or less than zero matter, cant make it any simpler than that!..
@KorAllRBare Well firstly, the real equation is E^2 = M^2C^4 + C^2P^2. The simple equation E = MC^2 does not account for the momentum of the particle. Secondly, mass is not being destroyed, it is simply being converted into pure energy from the annihilation. Antimatter is real and doctors are already using it in PET scanners.
lol I whole heartily agree, yes there is more to E=Mc^2 as there is even more to E^2 = M^2C^4 + C^2P^2, but in this case I feel your point is mute, and if you wish I can spell it out for you as to why? but then I am sure by now you may have given it some considerable thought with respects to MASS ENERGY EQUIVALENCE, and therefore may have stumbled upon a common error - if not - let me drop you a hint what needs to be treated with due care "Charge" NEED I SAY MORE?
You mean MASS and not matter, as matter is a poor inference - as it ignores mass that is with very little Potential, such as the NEAR-Vacuum, the very density that all lesser kinetic mass is based upon!..
@gets92 I didn't write the formula, I wrote what the formula means. In short it means that matter and energy are equal. What is E? It's energy. Whats m? It's mass. There stands E = m. (are equal). c is the speed of light, but I have no idea why the lightspeed² has to be multiplied i don't see that in school yet. What i do know is the meaning of it. The very proof is this video, antimatter and matter both dissapear and form energy, see? Matter could only transform in energy if they were equal.
@koerund Oh, I read it wrong, my bad. It would have been easier to understand if it said "NOTHING IS LOST" instead because the total amount of energy and matter is always the same.
@koerund Dude, if a large piece of antimatter somehow collided with Earth, there would be nothing we could do about it. And if somebody created a big enough amount of it to destroy the Earth, all they would need to do is touch it and BOOM, no more planet. It's not something we could ever prevent.
@ASwiftHippie jeez man. the onley thing about my comment is me saying that the released energy is equal at the used matter. thts all there is to it dude, i never wrote about a scenario of the earth being destroyed. so dont try to sound smart cuz i already know what you're saying. people trying to lesson me really piss me off, especially when im not even wrong
@koerund Nope. Like I said, the expression "all is not lost" suggests that it can somehow save us... but it can't. So your comment was wrong. Which was why I replied to it.
Intelligent people admit when they are wrong. Ignorant pricks deny it. Guess which one you're being right now?
@ASwiftHippie heheheh stupid... all is not lost. what is "all"? with "all" i meant the atoms. im totally not refferring to a doom scenario cuz then we would be all dead and all matter would be turned in energy. think before u coment. if you dont know how someone meant the things like they wrote, you shouldn't make your conclusions that fast. go study. then come back. guess most people understood it all fine else it wouldnt be the top comment. guess your not that intelligent as you think.
@koerund xD Nice excuse. You really can't admit when you make a mistake can you? It was clear what you meant. You're just using the ambiguous nature of the word all in a pathetic attempt to change the meaning of your original comment. You can deny it all you want. We both know the truth. I don't know why you care so much. YouTube is an anonymous forum where nobody knows or cares who you are in real life. Let me guess: You're going to keep denying it anyway? Haha, this is amusing.
@ASwiftHippie wtf is it with you anyway trying to prove your point? im just sittin here laughing my ass off at people like you. hehehe you are the idiot for misunderstanding. your only upload on your profile is about a shooter game? no wonder your such a horrible person. you can rage all you want but if you have a probelem with me and the way i write stuff, write a pm cuz your just filling this comment space up with your rubbish. i always admit mistakes, but never when i didnt.
@koerund Haha, why does it matter what my only upload is? It doesn't, you're just looking for material to insult me for. And I'm not raging at all. I'm only failing to understand why you are getting so defensive over something that doesn't matter at all. Clearly you're the one who's angry. I just pointed out one thing wrong with your comment on an anonymous forum and you act like I'm insulting you as a person. I don't care if you admit you were wrong, but don't go out of your way to deny it...
i hope this antimatter bomb gets developed sooner now then later in life. I would love to see it detonate. If any 21st century developed country created this bomb, hopefully Germany.
@TheRegimelife For one, you wouldn't SEE it detonate, you'd either be instantly killed or possibly just blinded completely. It's not like it'd look any different to any other huge bloody explosion. Also, my bets are on the US, they have all the cool stuff >_>
@yesamasa If you really wanted to do this, antimatter's not the answer. It's just the coolest way to do it. And by coolest I mean "most collateral damage-est."
anti christ,666,2012,illuminati,conspiracy,Obama's birth certificate ,Bin Laden's moon base,Hitler's moonbase,new world order,planet x - typical searches for a bored youtuber.
@ibanez2damaxx I think he's saying the cost of antimatter as in the cost of creating it. So the cost of antimatter = the cost of the stuff you have to buy and pay for to build stuff to carry out the process of creating it.
@garryliu612 What good is producing it more easily, if you can't contain it? We have done all the experiments we can with simply observing what anti-matter does when it comes out of the tube, now we want to test it as we test normal matter, which requires it be contained and manipulated.
It's curious to see how people are more interested in earing about how explosive anti-matter can be than actually learning about the physics behind it. Does everything really need to be entertaining to be popular?
You need matter/antimatter pairings to annihilate each other, so if you had 'antimatter' the size of the earth, you'd need it made from the same amount of individual anti-quarks and anti-leptons as the earth has quarks and leptons. An antiproton can't annihilate an electron, for instance, only a proton. And of course, it's not feasible to make a large enough amount without it annihilating the stuff it's not supposed to.
@QuargRanger And antimatter doesn't 'contain energy'. When it is annihilated, it and its antimatter counterpart turn into energy equal to their mass times by the speed of light squared.
And they also have opposite Lepton/Baryon number and strangeness, not just charge.
@slowpoke152 Lepton/Baryon numbers explain why when a neutron decays, the extra particles are anti-neutrinos, because electrons have a lepton number of 1, so it needs a -1 to stay at an overall lepton number of 0, which the original neutron had. And it needs to have a 0 charge because the proton and electron created have +1 and -1 charges, which cancel to be the same as that of the neutron already.
@millzie15 It could explode, if you had an anti-hand grenade :P It's just so much cooler to actually ANNIHILATE things with it, you can make a regular old explosion with regular old matter :P
@nofatchxplzthx i agree. and for that matter; anti matter doesnt change the laws of physics either. shit like this has been going on LONG before ANYBODY was aware of it. and im sure that some of the ratios in THIS video and others are dispersing HALF truths about the true threat=potential of this research; and then they use the patriot act and threats of martial law to keep anyone from knowing. but besides, there is no such thing as "free" energy. only potential, hopefully-for more practical.
@disestablishme also; check out the LHC= large hydron collider. damn, apparently my spell check cant spell that shit. oh, but it can spell CANT! no apostrophe?! really?
matter is the same as anti matter, just the opposite charge i dont know what he is talking about when he said it has large amounts of energy, same as normal matter.
probearhugger 3 days ago
Could a heavier antimatter atom like Antiplutonium for exapmle, annihilate with more energy than something like Antihydrogen? And is the annihilation destructive to what ever is near it?
Kingferath 1 week ago
Why don't you demonstrate it for us, presenter? ;P!
opapinguin 1 week ago
wtf is this guy talking about antimatter contains the same fucking amount as energy as matter. THIS GUY IS SO FUCKING STUPID STUPID STUPID FUCKING STUPID STUPID FUCKING SO STUPID FUCK STUPID STUPID AND MORE STUPID FUCK STUPID STUPID SHIT this guy is so old and yet has no firm grasp on what the fucking shit he is saying.
BrandonBlaze904 1 week ago
So, thats how the death star works.
SCIFIguy64 2 weeks ago
I Really Like The Video From Your Could Anti-matter Destroy the Earth
lupabuatchannel 2 weeks ago
Bullshit. Those "researchers" say bullshit to keep getting paid by government.
VejaUndead 2 weeks ago
Your Video Is Very Useful Sharing Could Anti-matter Destroy the Earth
cenedywong 3 weeks ago
Short answer... maybe
xxxDCTVxxx 3 weeks ago
so an anti-penis is a vagina and an anti-vagina is a penis.
MrRzymski 1 month ago
@MrRzymski no
Hornetization 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MrRzymski no
Hornetization 1 month ago
For 1, antimatter is no more explosive than normal matter, like bbsonjohn said, sort of. And for 2, it looks exactly the same, if this video is to explain antimatter, you might want to show it realistically and just have a label saying "This bit is the antimatter bit" instead of making it look completely exotic. I could do better than this, if I had any skill with making videos, which I don't.
slowpoke152 1 month ago
Dang, nuclear weapons no longer seem so bad.
cryora 1 month ago
man is only theory and proves nothing
loudon12 2 months ago
This is so wrong. Is this guy a dumbass?
mexicano7771000 2 months ago
So what is an anti neutron??? + because an anti electron is the opposite won't it just be a proton and if u put the particles together won't it be regular matter without the exeption of the anti neutron?????
TEHspazGUY 2 months ago
@TEHspazGUY I believe an anti neutron has got a negative mass, and as far as I know the anti electron won't be the same as an proton because it doesn't consist of the same quarks and therefor got way different mass.
Mattias01001010 2 months ago
@Mattias01001010 So 1kg of neutron + 1kg of antineutron = nothing (0kg of substances)?
It does not. 1kg of neutron + 1kg of antineutron = 2kg of energy. Antimatters has positive masses like matters.
Hence, antimatter-matter do not obliterate each other. Rather they produce energy with mass the same as the original sum of masses. Also, the energy themselves can create matter and antimatter pairs.So,
matter + antimatter -> energy -> matter + antimatter -> ??? -> profit
bbsonjohn 1 month ago
@bbsonjohn Sry I'm not a pro on this subject, thats way I added "I believe" :) and I see your point with the negative + postive = 0.. Althought I do remember I've read something like that :O They took the square root of mass and yeah
Mattias01001010 1 month ago
this guy is an idiot '-.-
MySuperlame 2 months ago
@260830107 it's contained with magnetic fields, keeping it from coming into contact with anything.
lazychimp123 2 months ago
1 gram of matter contains the same amount of energy as 1 gram of antimatter.
IamBread18 2 months ago
@IamBread18 yes, but in order to release its energy we must remove is sturcuture, thus how what animatter does They annialate each other releasing their energy
marquista96 2 months ago
@marquista96 I know that, doesn't change how much energy they have in them though.
IamBread18 2 months ago
This video is rife with scientific inaccuracies. I would be very surprised if the presenter has any kind of science degree.
ArgandPlane 2 months ago 17
@ArgandPlane I won't be surprised if he got his info off Wikipedia.
NDF211Gunner 1 month ago
i hate anitmatter it doesnt like me it wants to blow me up and same with other matter, its scary and dangerous
islamloverist 2 months ago
"The only way to unlock the full energy of matter is through using antimatter. Matter is inert otherwise". Totally wrong!
"An ounce of antimatter would reshape the planet". So? Try gathering an ounce of antimatter. You cannot.
Honestly, why comment when you have no idea what you're talking about.
tubewinkle 2 months ago
no one will be doing that any time......soon.
0121881066 2 months ago
Why single out antimatter, which is scarce? He could make the same energy statements about regular matter, which is abundant.
tubewinkle 2 months ago
@tubewinkle yes, but the only way to unlock the full energy of matter is through using antimatter. Matter is essentially inert otherwise. The same can be said about antimatter.
Thoralmir 2 months ago
An ounce of antimatter would reshape the planet. A piece of antimatter the mass of a paperclip could level New York city. An ounce of it would make the Earth uninhabitable.
bodinian 2 months ago
Wow
jrtc53 3 months ago
Comment removed
braunblender 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Learn more about the origin of universe: expertphp [dot] wordpress [dot] com
expertphp 3 months ago
@260830107 With a strong electrical field
multisizable11 3 months ago
1:38 aaarghh!!!
jerricchong 3 months ago
An antielectron is also called a positron.
jerricchong 3 months ago
Well, duuuuh, if we could use the energy of 1 pound of normal fucking matter at rest, we could power the United States for 2 days as well. Energy of a mass at rest is mc². Means it has enough power to do that. But try to convert that mass directly into energy, I wanna see these morons do that :P
AxjZOne 3 months ago
"if i were holding a pound of antimatter..." well let's just say you wouldn't be holding it for long
robotoop 3 months ago
Comment removed
superearthbender 3 months ago
"It is hard for us to imagine how much energy antimatter contain?"
There is as much energy as that contained in matter.
bbsonjohn 3 months ago 37
@bbsonjohn uau.... then how much energy unicorn contains?
G0MaS 2 months ago
@G0MaS How much does the unicorn weigh? :P
slowpoke152 1 month ago
@bbsonjohn He's talking about the ability to power a country like the example he gave.
JermeisterHD 2 months ago
@bbsonjohn Magnetic field suspension in a vaccum container.
Thoralmir 2 months ago
Comment removed
marquista96 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@bbsonjohn '' "It is hard for us to imagine how much energy antimatter contain?"
There is as much energy as that contained in matter.''
to the negative! and the power of anti matter is indeed the same as matter, BUT the real power would be when you combine both! hope i make sense!
Rel7eGaDe 1 month ago
usa wakeup earhthquake attack! with cern
westernmehmet 3 months ago
when you figure our a storing mechanism and cheaper way to produce it. the first thing we will have is a bomb for the military...
Darusdei 3 months ago
do it like in Angels and Demons
MrUserAcount 3 months ago
@PhyxTV then, ha, tough luck ;)
TheWilliamMaster 3 months ago
btw 1 gram of anti matter = 3 Hiroshima bombs
so 2.1 gram would be about a 100 kilo ton nuclear weapon (any larger and the energy would be blasted out into space so about 2 grams is alll you would ever want to have for military use)
ps US gov i have no U or Pu to make any so please leave me alone
thepresident1981 3 months ago
we we we we are going to blowing up our only earth?
jaze592 3 months ago
future guns will shoot anti matter and make humans disappear))
dimaxxxx 4 months ago
@dimaxxxx Antimatter would cause to much collateral damage, it's not magic. Same reason we use regular guns instead of grenade launchers, plus there's the cost of them.
slowpoke152 1 month ago
I thought that Anti-Matter was just a theory, used to explain how the Universe contains so little matter, yet is still able to not collapse on itself.
Resimaster 4 months ago
@Resimaster
Nope, it's been made in extremely small quantities, and is extremely expensive to make.
MQnoob 3 months ago
@Resimaster
Take back my last comment.
There is anti-matter, and there is dark matter.
What you are thinking of is dark matter, but this video is talking about anti-matter. Google search them and you will understand the difference.
MQnoob 3 months ago
@MQnoob Ahh ok, thanks for the info. Science never was my strong point! :-)
Resimaster 3 months ago
WE WILL NEVER ALLOW THE EARTH TO BE DESTROYED . OUR PLANET IS OUR MOTHER, NATURE IS BEAUTIFUL.
aFemale1 4 months ago
@260830107 Complex electromagnetic fields to suspend the particles in a near-perfect vacuum.
LordMutanus 4 months ago
oh yea and antimatter is not matter at all its an extremely unstable energy
nerradmw 4 months ago
@nerradmw Well, it's not matter, but it's not extremely unstable energy. Why does everyone assume antimatter is the dangerous one, when matter is just as much to blame? An antimatter universe would be the same as ours, there's actually no reason to think our regular matter is special. If there was a species of antimatter aliens, they'd think WE were the weird ones.
slowpoke152 1 month ago
BAGH ALL PPL HERE R NOT KNOWING OF ANYTHING first of all nothing can either be created or destroyed only converted so Fake!!!!!!!!
nerradmw 4 months ago
@nerradmw Matter is high-density energy, in a way. It makes just as much sense to say water is condensed steam, in the same way. So yeah, you're creating matter, but it's really just converting energy, you're not gaining or losing anything in the long run.
slowpoke152 1 month ago
dont forget its very VERY hard to contain anti-mater, as soon as it touches matter they destroy each other. so how on earth can we contain anti-matter
260830107 4 months ago 17
@260830107 A vacuum.
ASwiftHippie 4 months ago
@260830107
Search: CERN Traps ANTIMATTER - Antimatter atoms produced and trapped
Sunshine19891989 4 months ago
@260830107 LOL. I also wonder that.
MrGreedIsGood 3 months ago
@260830107 Maybe they could try to copy a ghost, and hold it without touching it, in space? After all, I don't think there is matter in space, maybe yes if you count meteoroids and dust particles, but just space by itself without ANYTHING is...well.. uh.....I dunno.... Say....what do you think happens when antimatter touches dark matter or energy? O_O
chikiwiki64 3 months ago
@chikiwiki64 If you could make anti-dark matter (I'd just call it light matter, even though it's still just as dark, appearance-wise), then you could annihilate that like ordinary matter. If you don't have any light matter, regular antimatter won't do anything more than what matter would do :P
Also I doubt you can really *touch* dark energy, and you can't make an antimatter form of it, though depending on what dark energy really is, gravity might oppose it :P
slowpoke152 1 month ago
@260830107 with magnetic feilds.
andrewmtbfreak 3 months ago
@260830107 keep it suspended with magnetic fields in vaccum,, costly but not impossible!
giggdaw 3 months ago
@260830107 we cant unless we can acheive a perfect vacuum which is impossible, even is space
CallumS319 3 months ago
@CallumS319 If you started with a chunk of anti-matter in a near vacuum the remaining particles of matter would come in contact with the anti-matter and be annihilated. Assuming the container is strong enough to withstand the "tiny" releases of energy when these particles are destroyed, you would eventually end up with a perfect vacuum, other then the lump of remaining anti-matter in the container.
sbalogh53 3 months ago
@sbalogh53 Still wouldn't be a perfect vacuum, since you can only annihilate the antiparticles of what you contain, and new particles like neutrinos would be constantly floating around. I don't think you can annihilate photons either, and that's not even going into quantum things like virtual particles.
slowpoke152 1 month ago
@260830107 Electro-magnetic levitation system in a 0-pressure vessel!!
meandmyevo 3 months ago
@260830107 maybe make a planet with completely no matter but anti-matter. and change your body so your cells and everything is made of anti-matter.
TheWilliamMaster 3 months ago
Comment removed
PhysxTV 3 months ago
@260830107 electromagnets, usually neodymium, as strong or several times as strong as earths magnetic field
PhysxTV 3 months ago
@260830107 A penning trap wouldn't work for larger quantities, due to the exclusion principle. But there are other methods, though not as energy efficient.
baryon15 3 months ago
@260830107
Magnetic force.
That's how they do it nowadays anyway, could be some better way in the future
hobbiz 3 months ago
@260830107 Somewhere in the future this may be a big issue. A whole new type of danger... Good thing we're here now not in the future
Blankskeen 3 months ago
@260830107 Yes, but thats the point. So as soon as you get a load of it, it will destroy the earth? Lol?
KarstenOkk 2 months ago
@260830107 Are you retarded? Have you not done an ounce of research at all? Fucking read a book kid.
JermeisterHD 2 months ago
@260830107 At CERN they now accomplished to retain it for about 15 minutes using some sort of field (not a magnetic field since they retained anti-hydrogen).
Smonjirez 2 months ago
@260830107 Electromagnetic Repulsion
armadica10 2 months ago
@260830107 magnets
kendambu 2 months ago
@260830107 ... magnetic fields...?
LonelyCheeto 2 months ago
@260830107 magnetism
DavidiVids 2 months ago
@260830107 someone could ivent some sort of gravitational suspension system or 'anti-grav' to suspend the particled in a vacuum and control the enegrgy released by reducing the suspension, although until we do that, we're kinda stuck
marquista96 2 months ago
@260830107 Magnetic fields?
AnnoyanceHazard 2 months ago
BigBottleLightlnc, Fuck off!!!!!
ThePhoenix23rt 4 months ago
Comment removed
mimekiller17 4 months ago
Positive charge? Negative charge? JUST USE A BATTERY...
BigBottleLightInc 4 months ago
Even regular matter can destroy the Earth. You know, if has anough mass and crash with enough velocity.
loupax 4 months ago
Comment removed
The3kinds 5 months ago
Ok so only a....lets say...... Iron matter.....If Iron matter and Anti-Iron matter come together they destroy each other so thats exactly why this is stupid cause it depends on the TYPE of anti-matter, only Iron matter and anti-iron matter can destroy each other or anti-H2O matter can destroy each other do you people understand now?
xXMrPandaGamerXx 5 months ago
@xXMrPandaGamerXx that's not how it works...the annihilation process goes down to the tiniest particules (positron, anti-proton etc.)...
summation: any antimater can annihilate any mater
m0mchil0 4 months ago
@m0mchil0 I know what you mean, but I'd like to clarify for others: All normal matter (Air, water, your mother, etc.) can annihilate the same sort of antimatter, because it's all made of simpler particles with simple opposites. Anti-potatoes can theoretically annihilate your sandwich, for example. However, an electron can't destroy an anti-proton, because the electron and the anti-proton (Or its parts, specifically) are completely different particles. It's... Kind of hard to explain here :P
slowpoke152 1 month ago
@slowpoke152 like i said, the annihilation process goes down to the elemental particles (electron-pozitron, proton-antiproton) in that order. You're right, a pozitron can't annihilate a proton. But, in the more complex system, theoretically an anti-dick can destroy your mother (sorry about that, but I couldn't resist to reply to the mother mention before :P). It's all a bit of a mind gag...
m0mchil0 1 month ago
@m0mchil0 *Thumbs up just for that joke :P*
An anti-dick could destroy a whole lot more than my mother :P It'd have to be pretty damned big to fully annihilate her though. Like, Chuck Norris scale.
slowpoke152 1 month ago
1111*
Musicalabionda 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Antimatter together but can not explode because the matter after the Big Bang was in equilibrium with antimatter
gdrfsdf 5 months ago
Comment removed
gdrfsdf 5 months ago
Comment removed
gdrfsdf 5 months ago
grrrreat there is no danger than :) wonderful but hence they can use it for an easy population reduction right hmmmm welll that wold be a clean up yeo they should play more nways whats trillions anyways just paper to print ups
artregeous 5 months ago
If you got about a +lb of anti-matter and some how got it in to the core of the earth with out it exploding you would probably destroy the planet.
TheDaftpunk02 6 months ago
@TheDaftpunk02 According to my calculations, 1 pound of antimatter is about 650 times the power of the bomb dropped on Hiroshima. In other words, it's a hell of a lot, but nowhere near enough to crack a planet.
slowpoke152 1 month ago
@slowpoke152 How about grab enough antimatter about the mass of the core and somehow place it in the center of the planets and then detonate.
TheDaftpunk02 1 month ago
@TheDaftpunk02 According to one website (No it's not Wikipedia :P) you'd need 25,000,000,000,000 tons of antimatter to overcome the escape velocity for every single bit of Earth there is :P
You'd need substantially less to blow it up temporarily, but then it'd all just collapse back together due to gravity. This won't destroy Earth, but you'd kill and destroy everything on it, which is usually sufficient. Also, that previous number is accounting for all the energy you'd lose from inefficiencies.
slowpoke152 1 month ago
What a load of Rubbish!..
KorAllRBare 6 months ago
@KorAllRBare How is that exactly?
hsharma92 5 months ago
@hsharma92,
Mass is the bases for all Matter, and Mass is Energy or Vice Vs Energy is Mass AKA "Mass Energy Equivalence or E=Mc^2", and conservation laws insist that "Energy" or "Mass" cant be destroyed nor created.. In other words you cant have zero or less than zero energy or mass, and therefore you cant have zero matter or less than zero matter, cant make it any simpler than that!..
KorAllRBare 5 months ago
@KorAllRBare Well firstly, the real equation is E^2 = M^2C^4 + C^2P^2. The simple equation E = MC^2 does not account for the momentum of the particle. Secondly, mass is not being destroyed, it is simply being converted into pure energy from the annihilation. Antimatter is real and doctors are already using it in PET scanners.
hsharma92 5 months ago
@hsharma92,
lol I whole heartily agree, yes there is more to E=Mc^2 as there is even more to E^2 = M^2C^4 + C^2P^2, but in this case I feel your point is mute, and if you wish I can spell it out for you as to why? but then I am sure by now you may have given it some considerable thought with respects to MASS ENERGY EQUIVALENCE, and therefore may have stumbled upon a common error - if not - let me drop you a hint what needs to be treated with due care "Charge" NEED I SAY MORE?
KorAllRBare 5 months ago
@KorAllRBare So you see a problem in charged particles being converted into energy?
hsharma92 5 months ago
@hsharma92,
What in the Universe are you going on about?
KorAllRBare 5 months ago
@hsharma92 Technically the mass IS being destroyed, by being converted :P
After all, you convert a cow into a hamburger, you've got just as much meat as you started with, but the cow was still destroyed in the process :P
+1 for knowing the full equation regarding momentum though, even I don't know that (Though I know OF it).
slowpoke152 1 month ago
cool, but since energy = matter we can rebuild the atoms with the released energy somehow. ALL IS NOT LOST
koerund 6 months ago 15
@koerund,
You mean MASS and not matter, as matter is a poor inference - as it ignores mass that is with very little Potential, such as the NEAR-Vacuum, the very density that all lesser kinetic mass is based upon!..
KorAllRBare 5 months ago
@KorAllRBare lol english isnt my mother language so i do not know the correct terms, i guess i did mean MASS :)
koerund 5 months ago
@koerund Are you stupid? so Einstein said E = m? try with E = mc^2 and we have got a deal.
gets92 5 months ago
@gets92 I didn't write the formula, I wrote what the formula means. In short it means that matter and energy are equal. What is E? It's energy. Whats m? It's mass. There stands E = m. (are equal). c is the speed of light, but I have no idea why the lightspeed² has to be multiplied i don't see that in school yet. What i do know is the meaning of it. The very proof is this video, antimatter and matter both dissapear and form energy, see? Matter could only transform in energy if they were equal.
koerund 5 months ago
@koerund If you imply that we can create energy out of nothing then you are wrong. The end.
madichelp0 4 months ago
@madichelp0 did u even read what i wrote? its the matter that dissapears and transforms into energy
koerund 4 months ago
@koerund Oh, I read it wrong, my bad. It would have been easier to understand if it said "NOTHING IS LOST" instead because the total amount of energy and matter is always the same.
madichelp0 4 months ago
@koerund Dude, if a large piece of antimatter somehow collided with Earth, there would be nothing we could do about it. And if somebody created a big enough amount of it to destroy the Earth, all they would need to do is touch it and BOOM, no more planet. It's not something we could ever prevent.
ASwiftHippie 4 months ago
@ASwiftHippie jeez man. the onley thing about my comment is me saying that the released energy is equal at the used matter. thts all there is to it dude, i never wrote about a scenario of the earth being destroyed. so dont try to sound smart cuz i already know what you're saying. people trying to lesson me really piss me off, especially when im not even wrong
koerund 4 months ago
@koerund Ok, then when would the information you shared ever be useful...?
Because "ALL IS NOT LOST" kind of implies that you're meaning it to be the solution to some sort of end of the world scenerio...
ASwiftHippie 4 months ago
@ASwiftHippie no i meant what i meant. that energy = matter. useful? who said every comment has to be usefull?
koerund 4 months ago
@koerund Nope. Like I said, the expression "all is not lost" suggests that it can somehow save us... but it can't. So your comment was wrong. Which was why I replied to it.
Intelligent people admit when they are wrong. Ignorant pricks deny it. Guess which one you're being right now?
ASwiftHippie 4 months ago
@ASwiftHippie heheheh stupid... all is not lost. what is "all"? with "all" i meant the atoms. im totally not refferring to a doom scenario cuz then we would be all dead and all matter would be turned in energy. think before u coment. if you dont know how someone meant the things like they wrote, you shouldn't make your conclusions that fast. go study. then come back. guess most people understood it all fine else it wouldnt be the top comment. guess your not that intelligent as you think.
koerund 4 months ago
@koerund xD Nice excuse. You really can't admit when you make a mistake can you? It was clear what you meant. You're just using the ambiguous nature of the word all in a pathetic attempt to change the meaning of your original comment. You can deny it all you want. We both know the truth. I don't know why you care so much. YouTube is an anonymous forum where nobody knows or cares who you are in real life. Let me guess: You're going to keep denying it anyway? Haha, this is amusing.
ASwiftHippie 4 months ago
@ASwiftHippie wtf is it with you anyway trying to prove your point? im just sittin here laughing my ass off at people like you. hehehe you are the idiot for misunderstanding. your only upload on your profile is about a shooter game? no wonder your such a horrible person. you can rage all you want but if you have a probelem with me and the way i write stuff, write a pm cuz your just filling this comment space up with your rubbish. i always admit mistakes, but never when i didnt.
im done here
koerund 4 months ago
@koerund Haha, why does it matter what my only upload is? It doesn't, you're just looking for material to insult me for. And I'm not raging at all. I'm only failing to understand why you are getting so defensive over something that doesn't matter at all. Clearly you're the one who's angry. I just pointed out one thing wrong with your comment on an anonymous forum and you act like I'm insulting you as a person. I don't care if you admit you were wrong, but don't go out of your way to deny it...
ASwiftHippie 4 months ago
i hope this antimatter bomb gets developed sooner now then later in life. I would love to see it detonate. If any 21st century developed country created this bomb, hopefully Germany.
TheRegimelife 6 months ago
@TheRegimelife For one, you wouldn't SEE it detonate, you'd either be instantly killed or possibly just blinded completely. It's not like it'd look any different to any other huge bloody explosion. Also, my bets are on the US, they have all the cool stuff >_>
slowpoke152 1 month ago
i have an anti-matter gun at my house. Don't fuck with me.
bouncingpogostick 6 months ago
How much would we need to destroy all the illegals in the USA
yesamasa 6 months ago
@yesamasa If you really wanted to do this, antimatter's not the answer. It's just the coolest way to do it. And by coolest I mean "most collateral damage-est."
slowpoke152 1 month ago
Inaccurate. But I'm going to make an antimatter business. lol
buddy39914 6 months ago
Already made it, it powers my house. If someone wants to slide me a few bill Ill let it power your house too . xD
KnickKnack101 6 months ago
anti christ,666,2012,illuminati,conspiracy,Obama's birth certificate ,Bin Laden's moon base,Hitler's moonbase,new world order,planet x - typical searches for a bored youtuber.
ILoveRavenc 6 months ago
$2 Trillion per ounce...Don't tell obama..Would mean another stimulus and the end of the world.
ntdude4 6 months ago
This video is so freaking inaccurate it hurts.
farzyness 6 months ago
How the fuck do they know how much antimatter would cost? Is there a cosmological Wal-Mart or something?
ibanez2damaxx 6 months ago
@ibanez2damaxx We already produce the stuff, and we know how much it costs to do so, so it's just a matter of multiplication.
HKragh 6 months ago
@HKragh Oh right. Awesome. Cheers mate.
ibanez2damaxx 6 months ago
@ibanez2damaxx I think he's saying the cost of antimatter as in the cost of creating it. So the cost of antimatter = the cost of the stuff you have to buy and pay for to build stuff to carry out the process of creating it.
KoreaRwkz 2 months ago
This guy looks like a shrew.
znoaetlhlaenr 6 months ago
Instead of people attempting to "contain" anti matter They should instead create a smaller antimatter "dispenser"
garryliu612 6 months ago
@garryliu612 What good is producing it more easily, if you can't contain it? We have done all the experiments we can with simply observing what anti-matter does when it comes out of the tube, now we want to test it as we test normal matter, which requires it be contained and manipulated.
Synthmilk 6 months ago
so thats how the death star works...
TheGilden00 7 months ago
why are you guys teaching people how to destory the world ><
IPodTouch3x3 7 months ago
@IPodTouch3x3 Because this method is so impractical, it'd be detrimental to try it :P
Just look at red mercury, it just made people waste all their time that could've been spent on REAL plans :P
slowpoke152 1 month ago
It's curious to see how people are more interested in earing about how explosive anti-matter can be than actually learning about the physics behind it. Does everything really need to be entertaining to be popular?
tifran9494 7 months ago
You need matter/antimatter pairings to annihilate each other, so if you had 'antimatter' the size of the earth, you'd need it made from the same amount of individual anti-quarks and anti-leptons as the earth has quarks and leptons. An antiproton can't annihilate an electron, for instance, only a proton. And of course, it's not feasible to make a large enough amount without it annihilating the stuff it's not supposed to.
And I'm agreeing with Webcamcomedy above.
QuargRanger 7 months ago
@QuargRanger And antimatter doesn't 'contain energy'. When it is annihilated, it and its antimatter counterpart turn into energy equal to their mass times by the speed of light squared.
And they also have opposite Lepton/Baryon number and strangeness, not just charge.
QuargRanger 7 months ago
@QuargRanger Yes but the only people who understand lepton/baryon number don't need to watch Youtube videos about it :P
Though for anyone else out there, SOMEHOW that explains anti-neutrinos, which are chargeless. I don't understand it though, not yet.
slowpoke152 1 month ago
@slowpoke152 Lepton/Baryon numbers explain why when a neutron decays, the extra particles are anti-neutrinos, because electrons have a lepton number of 1, so it needs a -1 to stay at an overall lepton number of 0, which the original neutron had. And it needs to have a 0 charge because the proton and electron created have +1 and -1 charges, which cancel to be the same as that of the neutron already.
It's been 5 months since I made that comment :)
QuargRanger 1 month ago
antimatter wouldnt explode just saying...
millzie15 7 months ago
@millzie15 It could explode, if you had an anti-hand grenade :P It's just so much cooler to actually ANNIHILATE things with it, you can make a regular old explosion with regular old matter :P
slowpoke152 1 month ago
anti matter has the same amount of energy as regular matter, its when it comes into contact that it causes the reaction
nofatchxplzthx 7 months ago
@nofatchxplzthx i agree. and for that matter; anti matter doesnt change the laws of physics either. shit like this has been going on LONG before ANYBODY was aware of it. and im sure that some of the ratios in THIS video and others are dispersing HALF truths about the true threat=potential of this research; and then they use the patriot act and threats of martial law to keep anyone from knowing. but besides, there is no such thing as "free" energy. only potential, hopefully-for more practical.
disestablishme 7 months ago
@disestablishme also; check out the LHC= large hydron collider. damn, apparently my spell check cant spell that shit. oh, but it can spell CANT! no apostrophe?! really?
disestablishme 7 months ago
With our current technology, we haven't even created enough anti-matter to turn on a lightbulb for a millionth of a second.
TheRottenSandwhich 7 months ago
Doesn't this hint towards matter actually being energy?
Kan2209 7 months ago