Added: 3 years ago
From: SFRobertsDickClarke
Views: 1,152
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (11)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • No, he didn't waive his first amendment rights when he walked into the classroom because he did not voluntarily walk into the class. He is forced to attend school, and therefore, the classes.

    Like DaveDogg said, a contract in school is not a legally binding contract, anyway.

  • Tomah high school is like a fucking prison I hate that place.

  • All I know is that whatever he did worked and I think he got a C on it. I personally think he should get a B+

  • The teacher's policy was just that, HER policy. Not the school districts.

    The Tomah district's handbook clearly states that "students may express their beliefs about religion in the form of homework, ARTWORK, and other written and oral assignments free of discrimination...."

    So not only was what the teacher did unconstitional, but what gives her the right to try and circumvent the school's own policies?!

    Stories like these need to be exposed, as there is other left-wing nonsense at THS.

  • the student is clearly a radical, if you bother to read the whole story. He agreed to follow the rules of the class and then did not do so. He would be severely punished for his actions in front of other students toward the teacher if he was my child. I teach my children to treat their teachers with respect and to recognize their authority

  • I think the point here is that the rules of the class are unconstitutional. So yes, it is arguable that he should have made his objection earlier, but not so arguable that he has waivered his constitutional rights merely by not mentioning it till later.

  • I think that the boy has a good case, and will probably win it. I read the agreement and I for the life of me cannot figure out why she would restrict religious expression. But, in my minds eye, the image of a student tearing up a paper to display defiance to a teacher is apalling.

  • I don't agree with lala3170. I don't think your opinion is biased at all.

    Well-explained and concluded.

  • Yeah, and look at the video YOU made.

  • Well, all I can say is that you don't go to THS like I do. You have no idea what goes on at our school, and I don't appreciate your biased opinion, niether does half of my school. Basically, this is just a case that came at the right time, now it will be blown out of proportion, and thanks to people like you, Church and State will never be seperate.

  • This is not about chrch and state. This is about freedom of expression. He has the right to express religious feelings if he wishes to. Chruch and state freedom is freedom of religion, not freedom from religion

  • Also, your use of "biased opinion" tells me you don't understand the use of the word 'bias'. Because by their nature, all opinions are biased, because if something is purely an opinion, it is not objective. However when something is an argument (which I have here made) then it is no longer purely an opinion, and thus can be debated. So unless you have an actual argument here, I am not impressed by your posturing

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more