please please tell me who did this song?????? it was a hit for such a short time but i never heard who did it and have been googling the only words i know to it ....alas to no avail.........she's my sister
That is awesome video. Nice shot and way to go. I have often played around with primitive weapons, but never the atlatl. At least not yet. --- To all of you limited thinkers watching this that say he's not a hunter just a killer. It takes a ton of skill to make a weapon and then use it to harvest food. Some say there is no honor in this hunt.....Well how much "honor" do you have when you buy ANY meat at ANY store or restaurant??? You're SMALL thinking hypocrites!
@ginganz13 Durrrr lookie at this thur ginganz, runs his mouth before reading what the uploader have to say durrrrr, emu is exotic animal durrrr. Fucking dumbass get a clue.
I look at it like this, I am learning to use and make an atlatl myself. everybody on the planet is starting to feel an unrest about where our civilization is heading and unlike the people who ignore it and choose to keep going to kroger, i choose to prepare for it. I can now make an arrow head and an atlatl in about 3 hours and i know numerous trapping methods. this isnt an obsession for killing things this is an obsession for survival..when the time come me and the people around me are survivng
It's not legal to use stone tips or the atlatl in Texas against game animals, only exotics. Also against the rules for multiple people with multiple deadly weapons in an uncontrolled environment. I've never even heard of a place that didn't have a fence around it. Also probably illegal. I didnt included the 3 mile foot pursuit (camera too jiggly) where i was resupplied and took two more birds which I had run to exhaustion. (emus don't sweat and over heat after a couple miles)
This is not a hunt. It a spot and shoot canned hunt of exotic animals on a game farm surrounded by fence around the perimeter. The animals are not afraid of cars, so the killers (not hunters in this case, there is no hunt) just drive right up to an unsuspecting animal and shoot it with a dart. There is no honor in this, there is no chase and there is very little effort involved. And there should be two or more other people to hit the animal with their own darts to kill the animal quickly.
@Tatooinedragracer This. A thousand times this. And the douche bag pose and smarmy grin afterwards is worse. Oh but Bubba feels like he accomplished something so that's all that matters right? Jesus save us from high tech rednecks.
@Tatooinedragracer does it not say in his comment that he whent on foot for three miles to catch it, plus you said"This is not a hunt. It a spot and shoot canned hunt of exotic animals" not a hunt then a hunt of exotic animals. that contradicts itself..................
@VingTsunFANATIC a lot of people hunt to try and reconnect to are ancestors though they may claim o be doing so as they are using stone points this is more like farming as the animals are caged when doing proper hunting no one is controlling the animals which is what it was like for are ancestors
Good shot! much people manage to do it using a firearm, but what about doing it with a thousand years old concept weapon? i'd like to build one of them, it does not looks so difficult to make ^^
I envy you considering your out doing this but cant really respect you as a hunter. Sending flint sailing isn't a respectful way of hunting your game... then it probably would have run off and been killed by a hyena or lion somewhere.
I'm not one of these anti gun dickheads (seeing as my dad and i own a gunshop i can't really afford to be), but its pretty cool seeing it done the way they did 10,000 years ago. Oh and fuck these guys who give you shit about hunting with a spear when the closest thing to a weapon they've probably handled is their mom's cooking spoon.
You should have at least tried to employ "hunting techniques". Preferably spear hunting techniques. If your using those kind of spears you would hunt in a group and single out an animal then throw multipe spears at it. (not launch a random spear at a group from behind because that's not even a kill shot if it lands) The ironic thing is that you went to the trouble of getting a flint spear but you don't care about using it properly. How much target practice have you had? Your not to accurate.
What your doing isn't hunting. I'm sure you realize that though. Your just driving around in a truck and hopping out to throw a spear at an animal on a reservation that's used to seeing humans at least from time to time. I guess you just wanted to see if a spear could really fly through the air and kill something ?
Always wanted to hunt those things. Looks like fun. @JaceMullen moot, not mute. As in a point that doesn't matter, makes no difference, not a point that can't speak.
I wonder how many anti-hunters watched this video, ripped on it, and then drove to Mickey D's and stuffed their face with a Big Mac or Chicken McNuggets?
Statistically significant elevated risks (ranging from 20% to 60%) were evident for esophageal, colorectal, liver, and lung cancer, comparing individuals in the highest with those in the lowest quintile of red meat intake. Cross, Amanda (2007). "A Prospective Study of Red and Processed Meat Intake in Relation to Cancer Risk". PLoS Medicine (the Public Library of Science) 4 (12): e325.
The studies and findings you are so fond of quoting are flawed; 1) they look at people with a primarily unbalanced diet, which is NOT what I am talking about. They are looking at people that take in little fruit/veggies, highly proccessed meat. 2) Do not take into account other contributing factors such as proximity to industrial centers, etc. 3) SYNTHETIC CARINOGENS ARE NEARLY IMPOSSIBLE TO BE FORMED FROM NATURAL SUBSTANCES! They are a result of the chemical additives.
@Chrisisms Again,you cherry-pick information because the full truth is against ur insane claims. The full report also states that "those in the lowest quintile of red meat intake" are also properly balancing their food, not omitting all meat, the nutrionists,doctors and every other health related expert in this country contridict your claims. Think u know more than they do?
Also,that message u sent me;U MADE THE COMPARISAN OF FRUIT + BREAST MILK!!!! U said it,check ur own posts:DUH!!!!!
@Chrisisms Are you that simple minded? How can u say "false?" It's an accepted fact, period. "More than my friends"? I am referring to nutrionists,doctors and health proffesionals, so u try to trivialize it as though it's converstion among friends? How about the simple fact that the food pyramid includes meat and fish? How about that it is part of a RECOMMENDED diet!? U r obviously a bit slow in the mental department.
U r only making urself sound pathetic and completely uninformed!!
No. I am just relaying the health data from the researchers.
"How can u say "false?"
Because your claim that 'every health related expert in this country contradicts the study provided is false. The abundance of research detects diseases related to meat intake, as covered.
"How about the simple fact that the food pyramid includes meat and fish?"
And grains and dairy, which are also unhealthy and unnecessary health compromises.
I wonder why Chrisisms state that there are "carcinogens in meat." That is a flat out lie. The only times you find carinogens in meat is when it has been heavily chemically proccesed. Fact; many fruits / vegetables in the store have been, as well. Meat does NOT keep the body from figthting infection. I looked up the study he cites, distorted the facts there, too.
I hate people who come to a place to lie and preach.
“Meat is also a source of several chemicals known to cause DNA mutations, including N-nitroso compounds (NOCs), heterocyclic amines (HCAs) and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs).” Those are synthetic carcinogens. Uncooked meat: Saturated fat in meat is a contributor to cancer risk. High meat protein increases cancer risk. Heme iron, the iron found in meat is also a natural carcinogen.
Meat has been found to be a direct cause of cancers of the lung, esophagus, liver, and colon, among others
@Chrisisms This is another piece of disputed findings! There are studies that indicate that a meat free diet leads to a loss of vital protiens not found in vegan, amino acids, etc, etc, etc!
@seekertrth "meat free diet leads to a loss of vital protiens not found in vegan, amino acids, etc, etc, etc!"
(citation needed)
You are unable to list one essential amino acid lacking in a fruit based diet. Humans require little protein, which is why human breast milk has 1% by weight of protein. The other great apes naturally produce more protein in breast milk because they require more. There is nothing wrong with human breast milk, it is perfectly suited for human requirements.
@Chrisisms Untrue, it is listed in pyhsicians publications, I do not have the publication on hand. The human body DOES require protiens,particularly when young,for muscle and brain development. You, however, provide nothing but falsehoods.
The Cancer Society does accept nor list meat as a source of cancer! Meat and fish are part of the nationally recognized food pyramid!
BTW, I used to work in the health field so I know, first-hand, the importance of a balanced diet! Stop lying and preaching!
The true protein content of breast milk, determined as described above, is 14–16 g/L during early lactation, 8–10 g/L at 3–4 mo of lactation, and 7–8 g/L at 6 mo and later. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 77, No. 6, June 2003
Lönnerdal B, Forsum E, Hambraeus L. A longitudinal study of the protein, nitrogen and lactose contents of human milk from Swedish well-nourished mothers. Am J Clin Nutr 1976;29:1127–33.
@Chrisisms WTF!! does that have to do w/ your erroneous claim that meat causes cancer?!?! You keep posting these scientific sounding posts that have nothing to do with the subject at hand. You have not answered my question as to how,if meat is a carcinogen it hasn't killed the human race where meat is the main staple of diet. Nor have you presented anything that is accepted by the general health care field as hard fact. Meat does NOT increase 56% a risk of breast cancer, I checked w/ NCRC.
@seekertrth "WTF!! does that have to do w/ your erroneous claim that meat causes cancer?!?!"
High protein diets fertilize tumor development in humans, requiring little protein. Cooked protein is denatured and particularly toxic.
But the comment revealing the low protein requirement for humans was in response to your strawman, "I do not have the publication on hand. The human body DOES require protiens"
Nobody said humans don't require protein. All the protein needed is in fruit.
And fruit has all the protein needed. Excess protein contributes to diseases of affluence, especially cooked protein, which forms heterocyclic amines-deadly, synthetic carcinogens.
For all of your quoting scientific texts, you clearly have no idea what you are talking about. Fruit contains VERY little (some contain nearly none) protien. You can not answer the simple question as to how, if meat is so very cancerous, humans across the globe survived for CENTURIES ON A HIGH MEAT DIET WITH LITTLE OR NO CANCER!
@seekertrth "how, if meat is so very cancerous, humans across the globe survived for CENTURIES ON A HIGH MEAT DIET WITH LITTLE OR NO CANCER!"
One can survive with cancer initiation for decades. Nonetheless, meat causes oxidative stress and doesn't just cause cancer but heart disease, Alzheimer's, diabetes, etc. The issue is not whether some ancestors survived by supplementing with meat but the fact is meat intake remains a health compromise.
@Chrisisms Explain people across the globe HAVE survived for centruries with high meat diets without cancer. You can not and have not addressed that, period! The cancer you are associating with meat products coincede with manufacturing, read chemical influence. You are ignoring a fundamental truth because you are so fixated upon your compulsive hatred for meat tthat you have shown only that you need a therapist.
@Chrisisms I have just triple checked, the NCRC and several of the medical references available, meat is not listed ANYWHERE as a cancer causing agent. In fact, it is still listed as in the nationally recognized "food pyramid." Meat and fish, in a balanced diet, is recommended, not discouraged.
So, are you privy to some knowledge that the best known minds in medical science do not?
@seekertrth Fruit contains all the protein for a healthy diet. Humans require little protein. Fruit contains comparable amounts of protein to human breast milk, necessary for the fastest rate of development, during the most critical stage of growth but not good enough for you?
@Chrisisms If only that were true, but it's not. Fruit contains VERY LITTLE PROTIEN. We DO require protien, talk to any nutrinionist, doctor or anyone else with a good working knowledge of human phisiology. We require protien AFTER breast feeding age.
You know, all you do is talk bull; either you have no clue what ur talking about or a flat-out liar, period!
Personally, I think ur a little slow and just make up things for attention, like an emotionally / mentally challenged little brat.
Perfect! So does human breast milk. Are you suggesting that humans are somehow genetically defective in not being able to produce enough?
How silly! Humans evolved from tens of millions of yrs of selective pressure to produce and supply the perfect amount of protein and nutrition in general in species-specific, human breast milk for development at the most vulnerable stage, growing the fastest, requiring 1% protein (like fruit) by weight.
@Chrisisms Every single time you open your mouth you simply prove that you have no brain. Breast milk is SHORT TERM and for long term it is NOT enough required for proper growth! Fruit is NOT breast milk and, news flash, generally contains less protien breast milk!There are some that approach the same ammount but generally has less. I don't even have nearly enough room here to list all of the problems w/ remarks. Short of it; you have the most asinine remarks that I have ever heard!
Exactly! And it is for the most critical time of development, when the baby requires the most nutritional diet during the most vulnerable time, growing at the fastest rate!
"for long term it is NOT enough required for proper growth!"
Are you suggesting that you are growing at a faster rate than a baby? This is not the trend among any known life form!
"Fruit is NOT breast milk"
Non sequitor. Nobody said it was... Why would fruit need to be breast milk?
@Chrisisms 1) growth is longer than breast feeding age. 2) You are ignoring the longer growth of humans and trying to twist my words around=lying. 3) You made the comparison of fruit having the same protien as breast milk,I'm correcting YOUR comment. YOU did say it, liar! 4) once more you prove you not only don't know what you're talking about but have to try to lie and twist other people's words around.
In short, you are proving how asinine you are with every post. LOL!!!!!
@seekertrth "growth is longer than breast feeding age"
Non-sequitor. Nobody said otherwise. Humans can continue to grow with food. This doesn't mean humans need to resort to meat/dairy/candy/alcohol, etc...
"You are ignoring the longer growth of humans"
Not at all. Humans develop slow but even at the stage of highest growth rate/babies, require 1% protein in breast milk...
@Chrisisms O,but since you want to bring up evolution,how is it that in the natural world,how is that in the natural world,after your 'tens of millions of yrs" we could not possibly find enough edible plants most of the year to sustain us?
That is a fact! The calorie intake alone would require us to search for edible plants 24/day and STILL not have enough to do anything but and our muscles would break down very quickly w/o the high protien in meat, leaving us unable to keep searching. Idiot!
"you want to bring up evolution" I do? "how is that in the natural world,after your 'tens of millions of yrs" ? I haven't lived 'tens of millions of yrs'. "we could not possibly find enough edible plants' u and your culture are out of habitat. "to sustain us?" The direct hominidae lineage co-evolved w/fruit tens of millions of yrs. What are u asking of me? "search for edible plants 24/day" Blaming God? "our muscles would break down very quickly w/o the high protien in meat" What muscles?
@Chrisisms So, let me touch on your breast milk comment some more. Pregnant women require protien and iron, best source; meat/fish. small children, past breast feeding age, also require them. Adults, especially those w/ medical specific conditions, require them. How does breast milk add into that?!
You post something to try to change the subject when you so-called facts are proven false and even that is in error. As I stated before; you are not sounding as intellegent as you think you are.
I'd da know; I'm more of a fish, crab, and lobster hunter. When catching fish I'll use rod and reel, noodling, and even Hawaiian sling. When catching crab; I'll tie a raw drumstick to a string. With lobster I'll use a lobster trap or my bare hands.
J Gastrointest Cancer. 2010 Jun;41(2):121-9. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether the consumption of specific food groups predicts the risk of pancreatic cancer..RESULTS: After adjustment for age, smoking, diabetes status, proxy interview, gender and total energy intake, a reduced risk of pancreatic cancer was related to vegetables, while an increased risk was associated with fish and shellfish [OR = 1.48; 95%CI: (0.78-2.80) p-trend=0.05].
The majority of case-control studies indicate the significant relationship between cancer risk and polymorphic metabolising enzymes in relation to dietary components. The risk of colorectal cancer is associated not only with CYP2E1 high-activity alleles, but also GSTA1 low-activity alleles, among consumers of red or processed meat"
@Chrisisms, scientists have tracked cancers back to many causes but by far and away the greatest causes of them are chemicals or forces in our environment caused by technology related sources. Eating red meat can be traced to a lot of positive things as well as negative, just like veganism. Consuming red meat and meat in general leads to better overall health, choking/cancer/conscience risks aside.
@gavinandzandra "cancers back to many causes but by far and away the greatest causes of them are chemicals or forces in our environment"
False. Ongoing poor diet prevents body from fighting off carcinogens in meat.
Pharm Res. 2008 Jul 15
"5-10% of all cancer cases can be attributed to genetic defects..The evidence indicates that of all cancer-related deaths, almost 25-30% are due to tobacco, as many as 30-35% are linked to diet, about 15-20% are due to infections.."
@Chrisisms so you are saying that nuclear waste and pollution doesn't cause more cancer than meat? I doubt that altogether. In fact, I know that is false. You are completely overlooking a typical cancer related scenario we are having right here in Idaho. There is a group called the "downwinders" who have suffered cancers directly linked to the nuclear fallouts from the testing done in the deserts of Nevada and other areas of the Southwest. A huge monetary award was granted them by the courts.
"nuclear waste and pollution doesn't cause more cancer than meat?"
True since humans are exposed to more meat than nuclear waste and as researcher I quoted said, diet factors contribute to at least 7xs more cancer than pollution.
"false."
Can you provide research to support your claim?
"downwinders" who have suffered cancers directly linked to the nuclear fallouts from the testing done in the deserts of Nevada"
True but more ppl are exposed to meat intake, which causes more cancer, thusly.
@Chrisisms especially given that nuclear waste/exposure influences both meat eaters and nonmeat eaters, you can see how what I am saying is correct. When the data is cross analyzed and outlying behaviors are excluded, meat eaters suffer no higher instance of cancer than any other group, especially tobacco/alcohol users as individual groups. When other factors are included, like driving while intoxicated, etc. drinkers and smokers far and away have much higher cancer risks than any other groups.
@Chrisisms you are actually proving my point about how much more dangerous nuclear exposure is than meat, given that fewer people were exposed to the nuclear fallout but yielded such a high rate of cancer the conclusion is apparent. The problem is that nuclear exposure, including x rays, gets lumped in with other risk factors because there is no easy way to isolate that risk category. It effects every other risk category in a negative way, and is probably behind the meat eater cancer rates.
"you are actually proving my point about how much more dangerous nuclear exposure is than meat"
I agree nuclear exposure is more dangerous than meat. But I never said to consume nuclear contamination. You advocate consumption of meat, and more people get cancer because of meat intake than nuclear pollution.
"people were exposed to the nuclear fallout"
But more people consume meat. So more people get cancer from meat than nuclear fallout.
@Chrisisms Meat caused by cancer has been refuted. The diet cited in that report is related to a poor OVER-ALL diet, as in NO vegetables and proccesed meats, prepared foods, etc.Your statemant is, therefore, misleading, to say the least!!
Incidentally, explain why people ate almost entirely meat and had very low or NO cancer for centuries. Stop distorting facts and preaching at other people.
@Chrisisms That number is IN DISPUTE! You do not look at anything other than what you want to hear.
Furthermore, I'm not saying to eat ONLY meat, or even as a main ingredient! Your bias shows in how you translate what I say and the information that you choose to use.
I'm done w/ this; you hate meat, fine...Want to throw out questionable facts, fine...twist things people's words around...fine. You are not sounding as intellegent as you think and people who view clips like this don't preach! BYE
Breast cancer risk increased by 56% for each additional 100 g/day meat consumption. Nutr Cancer. 2008 Mar-Apr;60(2):177-87.
"That number is IN DISPUTE!"
Don't just cheer lead about disputing, go ahead and dispute... You've been presented with data reflecting the positive association of breast cancer incidences with meat consumption. There are many mechanisms of action. Please respond to the issue instead of complaining. Provide scientific references as I do. Cow milk isn't suited for humans.
@Chrisisms BTW, your so-called studies are flawed; they failed, UTTERLY to properly take in other contributing factors! Can we say scare tactics / lie? Also, you haven't answered how native peoples across the globe survived on meat-rich diets w/o having cancer. If meat caused cancer, the human race would have died out from it LONG ago!
Yes. "Researchers can distinguish the feces of meat-eaters from those of vegetarians by their smell"
Br J Nutr. 2006 Oct;96(4):609-19. Genetic polymorphism of xenobiotic metabolising enzymes, diet and cancer susceptibility. On the other hand, phytochemicals, especially isothiocyanates, have a protective effect against colorectal and lung cancers
"How hard do you have to work to catch something?"
You don't. Just pull the trigger. Let technology do the rest...
@smallblocksupercharg Eating connotes digestion. One cannot digest the uric acid in red meat. Emu is red meat and the purines are converted to uric acid, which is a xenobiotic. Most of the toxins from Emu are excreted in urine but can contribute to gout.
@Chrisisms I assume that you are also familiar w/ the fact that there are many things in other foods that aren't digestable? Y'know, some of the acids, etc, contained in some fruits. If you don't eat red meat, fine, I don't eat a lot of it either. However, don't try to make it look like it's any more unhealthy than other foods.
@Chrisisms Your knowledge is obviously prejudiced, as are your conclusions. Mankind has digested meat for eons, plant foods are important but are not the sole answer. I respect your opinion but most certainly do not preach nor think anyone has that right, either.
"Meat diseases?" They are only a consideration / problem w/out balancing. However, with a diet that includes ALL foods, they are nominal (to the point of non-exisitence). Generally accepted that only 'vegan extemists' use the term.
@Chrisisms BTW, if you are so extremely opposed to meat and, by extension, hunting, why are you watching this and posting? Unless it's only to preach at other people.
Quantification of the neurotoxic beta-carboline harmane in barbecued/grilled meat samples and correlation with level of doneness. Harmane, one of the heterocyclic amines (HCAs), is a potent neurotoxin linked to human diseases. Dietary exposure, especially in cooked meats, is the major source of exogenous exposure for humans. harmane concentration was highest in chicken (8.48 +/- 9.86 ng/g)
I guess I was trying to emphasize a moot point in anthropology by taking an animal with a 2,500 year old flint "Marcus" point lashed to a seven foot dart with sinew and held in place with pine pitch. The birds aren't tame, they're horribly in-bred though. They have several hundred. They are for sale too...$50 a piece. They have a rocket net and a trailer.
@bennettcrow great shot man..ive taken many deer with atlatls.amazing with obsidian tips weapon and very effictive..my next step..buffalo with atlatl..
My two sons and I have taken to hunting with AtlAtl instead of bows. We stay together and the three of us try to throw at the same time/target to reduce suffering on the game. In a break with primitive tradition, I also carry some modern items to kill game if spears don't do it quickly enough. We've taken a couple of pigs and some turkeys this year.
please please tell me who did this song?????? it was a hit for such a short time but i never heard who did it and have been googling the only words i know to it ....alas to no avail.........she's my sister
jodysixstrings1972 2 weeks ago
congrats. Having worked for that bird, you earned it.
ZEEKUPP 3 weeks ago
awesome
1bushcraftboy 2 months ago
or use a gun lol jk cool
i tried making an atlatl...it failed misarble...dont use balsa for the arrows
elflordbob1 3 months ago
OM NOM NOM
KingMinos9 4 months ago
that was bad ass
fathernandez147 4 months ago
How many did you have to wound before you got a kill on tape?
ducksgonewild6294 4 months ago
holyshit nice shot! wonder if that tasted good.
monkeynut000 5 months ago
That is awesome video. Nice shot and way to go. I have often played around with primitive weapons, but never the atlatl. At least not yet. --- To all of you limited thinkers watching this that say he's not a hunter just a killer. It takes a ton of skill to make a weapon and then use it to harvest food. Some say there is no honor in this hunt.....Well how much "honor" do you have when you buy ANY meat at ANY store or restaurant??? You're SMALL thinking hypocrites!
maghunter73 5 months ago
Is it not disturbing to watch someone so excited to kill something
SteezyOtis 6 months ago
The best eating is something you've killed yourself with primitive hunting techniques.
ROBwithaB 6 months ago
Emu - weaaall dat dere is a reaul genewiiiine naytieeve texarse buuurd.
Not .you fucking yank assholes.
ginganz13 7 months ago
@ginganz13 Durrrr lookie at this thur ginganz, runs his mouth before reading what the uploader have to say durrrrr, emu is exotic animal durrrr. Fucking dumbass get a clue.
duckhunter17 6 months ago
I look at it like this, I am learning to use and make an atlatl myself. everybody on the planet is starting to feel an unrest about where our civilization is heading and unlike the people who ignore it and choose to keep going to kroger, i choose to prepare for it. I can now make an arrow head and an atlatl in about 3 hours and i know numerous trapping methods. this isnt an obsession for killing things this is an obsession for survival..when the time come me and the people around me are survivng
cuervokoro 7 months ago
wher is that????
hellzkid14 7 months ago
When the apocalypse comes, we'll be eating vegans.
Antiks72 7 months ago
It's not legal to use stone tips or the atlatl in Texas against game animals, only exotics. Also against the rules for multiple people with multiple deadly weapons in an uncontrolled environment. I've never even heard of a place that didn't have a fence around it. Also probably illegal. I didnt included the 3 mile foot pursuit (camera too jiggly) where i was resupplied and took two more birds which I had run to exhaustion. (emus don't sweat and over heat after a couple miles)
bennettcrow 8 months ago
are you guys hunting emu in america?
ewalks73 9 months ago
This is not a hunt. It a spot and shoot canned hunt of exotic animals on a game farm surrounded by fence around the perimeter. The animals are not afraid of cars, so the killers (not hunters in this case, there is no hunt) just drive right up to an unsuspecting animal and shoot it with a dart. There is no honor in this, there is no chase and there is very little effort involved. And there should be two or more other people to hit the animal with their own darts to kill the animal quickly.
Tatooinedragracer 9 months ago 20
@Tatooinedragracer I would agree with you. They're killers, not hunters; they enjoy killing things.
Antiks72 7 months ago 3
@Tatooinedragracer This. A thousand times this. And the douche bag pose and smarmy grin afterwards is worse. Oh but Bubba feels like he accomplished something so that's all that matters right? Jesus save us from high tech rednecks.
Lukos0036 6 months ago
Comment removed
roglet123 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Tatooinedragracer does it not say in his comment that he whent on foot for three miles to catch it, plus you said"This is not a hunt. It a spot and shoot canned hunt of exotic animals" not a hunt then a hunt of exotic animals. that contradicts itself..................
roglet123 5 months ago
@Tatooinedragracer so what is hunt for you??
VingTsunFANATIC 2 months ago
@VingTsunFANATIC a lot of people hunt to try and reconnect to are ancestors though they may claim o be doing so as they are using stone points this is more like farming as the animals are caged when doing proper hunting no one is controlling the animals which is what it was like for are ancestors
thomasnbishop 2 months ago
Love the way he gets after that emu.
williwonti 9 months ago
Good shot! much people manage to do it using a firearm, but what about doing it with a thousand years old concept weapon? i'd like to build one of them, it does not looks so difficult to make ^^
Elettronicopazzo 9 months ago
I envy you considering your out doing this but cant really respect you as a hunter. Sending flint sailing isn't a respectful way of hunting your game... then it probably would have run off and been killed by a hyena or lion somewhere.
ybotn 9 months ago
I'm not one of these anti gun dickheads (seeing as my dad and i own a gunshop i can't really afford to be), but its pretty cool seeing it done the way they did 10,000 years ago. Oh and fuck these guys who give you shit about hunting with a spear when the closest thing to a weapon they've probably handled is their mom's cooking spoon.
KillerWulf777 9 months ago
You should have at least tried to employ "hunting techniques". Preferably spear hunting techniques. If your using those kind of spears you would hunt in a group and single out an animal then throw multipe spears at it. (not launch a random spear at a group from behind because that's not even a kill shot if it lands) The ironic thing is that you went to the trouble of getting a flint spear but you don't care about using it properly. How much target practice have you had? Your not to accurate.
rascalMatt17 9 months ago 3
What your doing isn't hunting. I'm sure you realize that though. Your just driving around in a truck and hopping out to throw a spear at an animal on a reservation that's used to seeing humans at least from time to time. I guess you just wanted to see if a spear could really fly through the air and kill something ?
rascalMatt17 9 months ago
wow, they really do work! amazing, ancient man must have had a field day with this!
jukio02 10 months ago
Is that the only reason you joined the Army!?!?!?
rswildwoman 10 months ago
To all hunters who think it sporting....
I joined the Army to fight.....to hunt a quarry that also had a weapon & was on the hunt too.
Im here typing, so I must have survived.
To hunt for no reason except "sport"?...
I call you all cowards of the highest degree.
PeterPeli 10 months ago
@PeterPeli bullshit , you couldn't be accepted into the army hippie cut your friggin hair dude
landronics 10 months ago
couldnt get for the big game so u whent for a flightless bird
BringMeTheDrumer 10 months ago
Whata BEAST!!!!
mrkewlkid1231 11 months ago
cool/ грамотный чел))
yfyufff 11 months ago
I wan't me some "chicken fried" "emu" nuggets!
Mmmmm... Tastay!....
NicholasKelley111 11 months ago
where is this?
Herimia 11 months ago
That´s a wonderfull work,fantastic hit :o)
radar19771 1 year ago
im hungry now ...
oninjadolegume 1 year ago
I am a hunter, and since i like emus so much id never kill one, but great job and i hope they tasted great! :)
missourninja 1 year ago
that kinda looks like Topesy Exotic ranch...is it by chance? if not is it in TX?
1crazyfocker 1 year ago
i cant wait to try hunting with a spear/dart and atlatl, working on being able to trow it and hit a target first. nice shot too by the way.
1crazyfocker 1 year ago
Good throwing!
atlatlwy 1 year ago
Um what about their penises?
TheWoodlandHippie 1 year ago
Always wanted to hunt those things. Looks like fun. @JaceMullen moot, not mute. As in a point that doesn't matter, makes no difference, not a point that can't speak.
TheGhost1066 1 year ago
Hahaha this was intense
perrowify 1 year ago
wow that looks like fun
kk201airsoftnfishn 1 year ago
I wonder how many anti-hunters watched this video, ripped on it, and then drove to Mickey D's and stuffed their face with a Big Mac or Chicken McNuggets?
bjggjb 1 year ago 55
@bjggjb I'm not an Anti-hunter, However I could use a 5pc chicken select with a large fry,and large Coke..
aaaaa0000000000 1 year ago
@bjggjb Amen. Besieds, the good Lord Jesus said to Peter, "Arise, Kill and Eat".lol
TheByrdWhoLovesRock 10 months ago
@bjggjb haha good 1
roohunter101 7 months ago
For Pete's sake put that sucker out of its misery.
theWZZA 1 year ago
looookk at the size oooooff that chicken
MrRubster6769 1 year ago
Yeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee Dawwwgy looky here Randy we got us a big bird right her!!!!!!
Gaymer101 1 year ago
What's with all the antis throwing a fit when they stuff like this. If you don't like it; don't watch it.
DaddyWarbucks452 1 year ago
Statistically significant elevated risks (ranging from 20% to 60%) were evident for esophageal, colorectal, liver, and lung cancer, comparing individuals in the highest with those in the lowest quintile of red meat intake. Cross, Amanda (2007). "A Prospective Study of Red and Processed Meat Intake in Relation to Cancer Risk". PLoS Medicine (the Public Library of Science) 4 (12): e325.
Chrisisms 1 year ago
@Chrisisms Section 2
The studies and findings you are so fond of quoting are flawed; 1) they look at people with a primarily unbalanced diet, which is NOT what I am talking about. They are looking at people that take in little fruit/veggies, highly proccessed meat. 2) Do not take into account other contributing factors such as proximity to industrial centers, etc. 3) SYNTHETIC CARINOGENS ARE NEARLY IMPOSSIBLE TO BE FORMED FROM NATURAL SUBSTANCES! They are a result of the chemical additives.
seekertrth 1 year ago
@Chrisisms Again,you cherry-pick information because the full truth is against ur insane claims. The full report also states that "those in the lowest quintile of red meat intake" are also properly balancing their food, not omitting all meat, the nutrionists,doctors and every other health related expert in this country contridict your claims. Think u know more than they do?
Also,that message u sent me;U MADE THE COMPARISAN OF FRUIT + BREAST MILK!!!! U said it,check ur own posts:DUH!!!!!
seekertrth 1 year ago
"lowest quintile of red meat intake" are also properly balancing their food"
It is just less unbalanced than high meat intake.
"not omitting all meat"
Where is evidence that omitting all meat doesn't provide further benefit?
"every other health related expert in this country contridict your claims"
False.
"Think u know more than they do?"
Non sequitor. The issue is not whether I know more or less than your friends. The issue is the positive correlation of animal products w/disease.
Chrisisms 1 year ago
@Chrisisms Are you that simple minded? How can u say "false?" It's an accepted fact, period. "More than my friends"? I am referring to nutrionists,doctors and health proffesionals, so u try to trivialize it as though it's converstion among friends? How about the simple fact that the food pyramid includes meat and fish? How about that it is part of a RECOMMENDED diet!? U r obviously a bit slow in the mental department.
U r only making urself sound pathetic and completely uninformed!!
seekertrth 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@seekertrth "Are you that simple minded?"
No. I am just relaying the health data from the researchers.
"How can u say "false?"
Because your claim that 'every health related expert in this country contradicts the study provided is false. The abundance of research detects diseases related to meat intake, as covered.
"How about the simple fact that the food pyramid includes meat and fish?"
And grains and dairy, which are also unhealthy and unnecessary health compromises.
Chrisisms 1 year ago
I wonder why Chrisisms state that there are "carcinogens in meat." That is a flat out lie. The only times you find carinogens in meat is when it has been heavily chemically proccesed. Fact; many fruits / vegetables in the store have been, as well. Meat does NOT keep the body from figthting infection. I looked up the study he cites, distorted the facts there, too.
I hate people who come to a place to lie and preach.
seekertrth 1 year ago
“Meat is also a source of several chemicals known to cause DNA mutations, including N-nitroso compounds (NOCs), heterocyclic amines (HCAs) and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs).” Those are synthetic carcinogens. Uncooked meat: Saturated fat in meat is a contributor to cancer risk. High meat protein increases cancer risk. Heme iron, the iron found in meat is also a natural carcinogen.
Meat has been found to be a direct cause of cancers of the lung, esophagus, liver, and colon, among others
Chrisisms 1 year ago
@Chrisisms This is another piece of disputed findings! There are studies that indicate that a meat free diet leads to a loss of vital protiens not found in vegan, amino acids, etc, etc, etc!
seekertrth 1 year ago
@seekertrth "meat free diet leads to a loss of vital protiens not found in vegan, amino acids, etc, etc, etc!"
(citation needed)
You are unable to list one essential amino acid lacking in a fruit based diet. Humans require little protein, which is why human breast milk has 1% by weight of protein. The other great apes naturally produce more protein in breast milk because they require more. There is nothing wrong with human breast milk, it is perfectly suited for human requirements.
Chrisisms 1 year ago
@Chrisisms Untrue, it is listed in pyhsicians publications, I do not have the publication on hand. The human body DOES require protiens,particularly when young,for muscle and brain development. You, however, provide nothing but falsehoods.
The Cancer Society does accept nor list meat as a source of cancer! Meat and fish are part of the nationally recognized food pyramid!
BTW, I used to work in the health field so I know, first-hand, the importance of a balanced diet! Stop lying and preaching!
seekertrth 1 year ago
human breast milk has 1% by weight of protein.
seekeruntrth "untrue'
The true protein content of breast milk, determined as described above, is 14–16 g/L during early lactation, 8–10 g/L at 3–4 mo of lactation, and 7–8 g/L at 6 mo and later. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 77, No. 6, June 2003
Lönnerdal B, Forsum E, Hambraeus L. A longitudinal study of the protein, nitrogen and lactose contents of human milk from Swedish well-nourished mothers. Am J Clin Nutr 1976;29:1127–33.
Chrisisms 1 year ago
@Chrisisms WTF!! does that have to do w/ your erroneous claim that meat causes cancer?!?! You keep posting these scientific sounding posts that have nothing to do with the subject at hand. You have not answered my question as to how,if meat is a carcinogen it hasn't killed the human race where meat is the main staple of diet. Nor have you presented anything that is accepted by the general health care field as hard fact. Meat does NOT increase 56% a risk of breast cancer, I checked w/ NCRC.
seekertrth 1 year ago
@seekertrth "WTF!! does that have to do w/ your erroneous claim that meat causes cancer?!?!"
High protein diets fertilize tumor development in humans, requiring little protein. Cooked protein is denatured and particularly toxic.
But the comment revealing the low protein requirement for humans was in response to your strawman, "I do not have the publication on hand. The human body DOES require protiens"
Nobody said humans don't require protein. All the protein needed is in fruit.
Chrisisms 1 year ago
@Chrisisms "The human body DOES require protiens"
And fruit has all the protein needed. Excess protein contributes to diseases of affluence, especially cooked protein, which forms heterocyclic amines-deadly, synthetic carcinogens.
Chrisisms 1 year ago
@Chrisisms Section 1:
For all of your quoting scientific texts, you clearly have no idea what you are talking about. Fruit contains VERY little (some contain nearly none) protien. You can not answer the simple question as to how, if meat is so very cancerous, humans across the globe survived for CENTURIES ON A HIGH MEAT DIET WITH LITTLE OR NO CANCER!
seekertrth 1 year ago
@seekertrth "how, if meat is so very cancerous, humans across the globe survived for CENTURIES ON A HIGH MEAT DIET WITH LITTLE OR NO CANCER!"
One can survive with cancer initiation for decades. Nonetheless, meat causes oxidative stress and doesn't just cause cancer but heart disease, Alzheimer's, diabetes, etc. The issue is not whether some ancestors survived by supplementing with meat but the fact is meat intake remains a health compromise.
Chrisisms 1 year ago
@Chrisisms Explain people across the globe HAVE survived for centruries with high meat diets without cancer. You can not and have not addressed that, period! The cancer you are associating with meat products coincede with manufacturing, read chemical influence. You are ignoring a fundamental truth because you are so fixated upon your compulsive hatred for meat tthat you have shown only that you need a therapist.
seekertrth 1 year ago
@Chrisisms I have just triple checked, the NCRC and several of the medical references available, meat is not listed ANYWHERE as a cancer causing agent. In fact, it is still listed as in the nationally recognized "food pyramid." Meat and fish, in a balanced diet, is recommended, not discouraged.
So, are you privy to some knowledge that the best known minds in medical science do not?
seekertrth 1 year ago
@seekertrth
Don't feed the fucking troll.
It has a pathetic life,goes around youtube looking for people to argue with.That' may be his way of getting affection.
Go to the video "VEGAN VIDEO" if you want to see him proven wrong many a times.
You know,he believes humans can live on only fruit.
When fruitarians die,he blames it on DETOX.
Always has an excuse.Not a good one though.
budliite 1 year ago
@budliite You are absolutely right! Thanx for reminding me how pathetic it is. :D
seekertrth 1 year ago
@seekertrth Fruit contains all the protein for a healthy diet. Humans require little protein. Fruit contains comparable amounts of protein to human breast milk, necessary for the fastest rate of development, during the most critical stage of growth but not good enough for you?
Chrisisms 1 year ago
@Chrisisms If only that were true, but it's not. Fruit contains VERY LITTLE PROTIEN. We DO require protien, talk to any nutrinionist, doctor or anyone else with a good working knowledge of human phisiology. We require protien AFTER breast feeding age.
You know, all you do is talk bull; either you have no clue what ur talking about or a flat-out liar, period!
Personally, I think ur a little slow and just make up things for attention, like an emotionally / mentally challenged little brat.
seekertrth 1 year ago
@seekertrth "Fruit contains VERY LITTLE PROTIEN"
Perfect! So does human breast milk. Are you suggesting that humans are somehow genetically defective in not being able to produce enough?
How silly! Humans evolved from tens of millions of yrs of selective pressure to produce and supply the perfect amount of protein and nutrition in general in species-specific, human breast milk for development at the most vulnerable stage, growing the fastest, requiring 1% protein (like fruit) by weight.
Chrisisms 1 year ago
@Chrisisms
Fat in milk accounts for about 50% of the energy.
Are you saying humans require 50% fat in thier diet?
Is that what you're saying?
budliite 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@budliite "Fat in milk accounts for about 50% of the energy"
False. Fat in cow milk is higher than human milk but human milk does NOT consist of 50% fat. Please provide some credible source for your claim.
Are you saying humans require 50% fat in thier diet?"
?????????????????????????? How are things on Mars?
Chrisisms 1 year ago
@Chrisisms Every single time you open your mouth you simply prove that you have no brain. Breast milk is SHORT TERM and for long term it is NOT enough required for proper growth! Fruit is NOT breast milk and, news flash, generally contains less protien breast milk!There are some that approach the same ammount but generally has less. I don't even have nearly enough room here to list all of the problems w/ remarks. Short of it; you have the most asinine remarks that I have ever heard!
seekertrth 1 year ago
@seekertrth "Breast milk is SHORT TERM"
Exactly! And it is for the most critical time of development, when the baby requires the most nutritional diet during the most vulnerable time, growing at the fastest rate!
"for long term it is NOT enough required for proper growth!"
Are you suggesting that you are growing at a faster rate than a baby? This is not the trend among any known life form!
"Fruit is NOT breast milk"
Non sequitor. Nobody said it was... Why would fruit need to be breast milk?
Chrisisms 1 year ago
@Chrisisms 1) growth is longer than breast feeding age. 2) You are ignoring the longer growth of humans and trying to twist my words around=lying. 3) You made the comparison of fruit having the same protien as breast milk,I'm correcting YOUR comment. YOU did say it, liar! 4) once more you prove you not only don't know what you're talking about but have to try to lie and twist other people's words around.
In short, you are proving how asinine you are with every post. LOL!!!!!
You are pathetic!
seekertrth 1 year ago
@seekertrth "growth is longer than breast feeding age"
Non-sequitor. Nobody said otherwise. Humans can continue to grow with food. This doesn't mean humans need to resort to meat/dairy/candy/alcohol, etc...
"You are ignoring the longer growth of humans"
Not at all. Humans develop slow but even at the stage of highest growth rate/babies, require 1% protein in breast milk...
"twist my words around"
??
"fruit having the same protien as breast milk"
False. Please quote.
Chrisisms 1 year ago
@Chrisisms O,but since you want to bring up evolution,how is it that in the natural world,how is that in the natural world,after your 'tens of millions of yrs" we could not possibly find enough edible plants most of the year to sustain us?
That is a fact! The calorie intake alone would require us to search for edible plants 24/day and STILL not have enough to do anything but and our muscles would break down very quickly w/o the high protien in meat, leaving us unable to keep searching. Idiot!
seekertrth 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Chrisisms 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@seekertrth "Meat does NOT increase 56% a risk of breast cancer"
"Breast cancer risk increased by 56% for each additional 100 g/day meat consumption. Nutr Cancer. 2008 Mar-Apr;60(2):177-87.
Chrisisms 1 year ago
@Chrisisms So, let me touch on your breast milk comment some more. Pregnant women require protien and iron, best source; meat/fish. small children, past breast feeding age, also require them. Adults, especially those w/ medical specific conditions, require them. How does breast milk add into that?!
You post something to try to change the subject when you so-called facts are proven false and even that is in error. As I stated before; you are not sounding as intellegent as you think you are.
seekertrth 1 year ago
I'd da know; I'm more of a fish, crab, and lobster hunter. When catching fish I'll use rod and reel, noodling, and even Hawaiian sling. When catching crab; I'll tie a raw drumstick to a string. With lobster I'll use a lobster trap or my bare hands.
DaddyWarbucks452 1 year ago
"When catching fish I'll use rod..."
J Gastrointest Cancer. 2010 Jun;41(2):121-9. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether the consumption of specific food groups predicts the risk of pancreatic cancer..RESULTS: After adjustment for age, smoking, diabetes status, proxy interview, gender and total energy intake, a reduced risk of pancreatic cancer was related to vegetables, while an increased risk was associated with fish and shellfish [OR = 1.48; 95%CI: (0.78-2.80) p-trend=0.05].
Chrisisms 1 year ago
that meat looks pretty good. I bet he was good eating. Looks like fun.
gavinandzandra 1 year ago
@gavinandzandra Br J Nutr. 2006 Oct;96(4):609-19.
The majority of case-control studies indicate the significant relationship between cancer risk and polymorphic metabolising enzymes in relation to dietary components. The risk of colorectal cancer is associated not only with CYP2E1 high-activity alleles, but also GSTA1 low-activity alleles, among consumers of red or processed meat"
There is nothing 'fun' about cancer...
Chrisisms 1 year ago
@Chrisisms, scientists have tracked cancers back to many causes but by far and away the greatest causes of them are chemicals or forces in our environment caused by technology related sources. Eating red meat can be traced to a lot of positive things as well as negative, just like veganism. Consuming red meat and meat in general leads to better overall health, choking/cancer/conscience risks aside.
gavinandzandra 1 year ago
@gavinandzandra "cancers back to many causes but by far and away the greatest causes of them are chemicals or forces in our environment"
False. Ongoing poor diet prevents body from fighting off carcinogens in meat.
Pharm Res. 2008 Jul 15
"5-10% of all cancer cases can be attributed to genetic defects..The evidence indicates that of all cancer-related deaths, almost 25-30% are due to tobacco, as many as 30-35% are linked to diet, about 15-20% are due to infections.."
Chrisisms 1 year ago
@Chrisisms so you are saying that nuclear waste and pollution doesn't cause more cancer than meat? I doubt that altogether. In fact, I know that is false. You are completely overlooking a typical cancer related scenario we are having right here in Idaho. There is a group called the "downwinders" who have suffered cancers directly linked to the nuclear fallouts from the testing done in the deserts of Nevada and other areas of the Southwest. A huge monetary award was granted them by the courts.
gavinandzandra 1 year ago
"nuclear waste and pollution doesn't cause more cancer than meat?"
True since humans are exposed to more meat than nuclear waste and as researcher I quoted said, diet factors contribute to at least 7xs more cancer than pollution.
"false."
Can you provide research to support your claim?
"downwinders" who have suffered cancers directly linked to the nuclear fallouts from the testing done in the deserts of Nevada"
True but more ppl are exposed to meat intake, which causes more cancer, thusly.
Chrisisms 1 year ago
@Chrisisms especially given that nuclear waste/exposure influences both meat eaters and nonmeat eaters, you can see how what I am saying is correct. When the data is cross analyzed and outlying behaviors are excluded, meat eaters suffer no higher instance of cancer than any other group, especially tobacco/alcohol users as individual groups. When other factors are included, like driving while intoxicated, etc. drinkers and smokers far and away have much higher cancer risks than any other groups.
gavinandzandra 1 year ago
@Chrisisms you are actually proving my point about how much more dangerous nuclear exposure is than meat, given that fewer people were exposed to the nuclear fallout but yielded such a high rate of cancer the conclusion is apparent. The problem is that nuclear exposure, including x rays, gets lumped in with other risk factors because there is no easy way to isolate that risk category. It effects every other risk category in a negative way, and is probably behind the meat eater cancer rates.
gavinandzandra 1 year ago
"you are actually proving my point about how much more dangerous nuclear exposure is than meat"
I agree nuclear exposure is more dangerous than meat. But I never said to consume nuclear contamination. You advocate consumption of meat, and more people get cancer because of meat intake than nuclear pollution.
"people were exposed to the nuclear fallout"
But more people consume meat. So more people get cancer from meat than nuclear fallout.
"nuclear exposure"
Is a different topic..
Chrisisms 1 year ago
@Chrisisms Meat caused by cancer has been refuted. The diet cited in that report is related to a poor OVER-ALL diet, as in NO vegetables and proccesed meats, prepared foods, etc.Your statemant is, therefore, misleading, to say the least!!
Incidentally, explain why people ate almost entirely meat and had very low or NO cancer for centuries. Stop distorting facts and preaching at other people.
seekertrth 1 year ago
@seekertrth Breast cancer risk increased by 56% for each additional 100 g/day meat consumption. Nutr Cancer. 2008 Mar-Apr;60(2):177-87.
Real food like blueberries, lettuce, raw sprouts, apples, etc prevent not cause cancer.
Chrisisms 1 year ago
@Chrisisms That number is IN DISPUTE! You do not look at anything other than what you want to hear.
Furthermore, I'm not saying to eat ONLY meat, or even as a main ingredient! Your bias shows in how you translate what I say and the information that you choose to use.
I'm done w/ this; you hate meat, fine...Want to throw out questionable facts, fine...twist things people's words around...fine. You are not sounding as intellegent as you think and people who view clips like this don't preach! BYE
seekertrth 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Breast cancer risk increased by 56% for each additional 100 g/day meat consumption. Nutr Cancer. 2008 Mar-Apr;60(2):177-87.
"That number is IN DISPUTE!"
Don't just cheer lead about disputing, go ahead and dispute... You've been presented with data reflecting the positive association of breast cancer incidences with meat consumption. There are many mechanisms of action. Please respond to the issue instead of complaining. Provide scientific references as I do. Cow milk isn't suited for humans.
Chrisisms 1 year ago
@Chrisisms BTW, your so-called studies are flawed; they failed, UTTERLY to properly take in other contributing factors! Can we say scare tactics / lie? Also, you haven't answered how native peoples across the globe survived on meat-rich diets w/o having cancer. If meat caused cancer, the human race would have died out from it LONG ago!
seekertrth 1 year ago
This is hilarius redneck giant bird hunting XD
shotgunwithatapeworm 1 year ago
You guys are bad ass!
Who's idea was it to hunt with atlatls??
How hard do you have to work to catch something?
mrktwn 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@mrktwn "You guys are bad ass!"
Yes. "Researchers can distinguish the feces of meat-eaters from those of vegetarians by their smell"
Br J Nutr. 2006 Oct;96(4):609-19. Genetic polymorphism of xenobiotic metabolising enzymes, diet and cancer susceptibility. On the other hand, phytochemicals, especially isothiocyanates, have a protective effect against colorectal and lung cancers
"How hard do you have to work to catch something?"
You don't. Just pull the trigger. Let technology do the rest...
Chrisisms 1 year ago
obsidian is a razor blade sharper than modern steel blades..the native people were just as good hunters as we are today with guns
5tonyvvvv 1 year ago
i wanna eat that bird
smallblocksupercharg 1 year ago
@smallblocksupercharg Eating connotes digestion. One cannot digest the uric acid in red meat. Emu is red meat and the purines are converted to uric acid, which is a xenobiotic. Most of the toxins from Emu are excreted in urine but can contribute to gout.
Chrisisms 1 year ago
@Chrisisms I assume that you are also familiar w/ the fact that there are many things in other foods that aren't digestable? Y'know, some of the acids, etc, contained in some fruits. If you don't eat red meat, fine, I don't eat a lot of it either. However, don't try to make it look like it's any more unhealthy than other foods.
...Balanced Diet!
seekertrth 1 year ago
@seekertrth "I assume that you are also familiar w/ the fact that there are many things in other foods that aren't digestable?"
The difference is that fiber in plants aids digestion, while xenobiotics in meat cause diseases that the fiber in plants reverses.
"don't try to make it look like it's any more unhealthy than other foods"
Meat and fruit are NOT digested equally. Fruit reverses meat diseases.
"...Balanced Diet!"
A balanced disease risk results from trying to 'balance diet' w/meat.
Chrisisms 1 year ago
@Chrisisms Your knowledge is obviously prejudiced, as are your conclusions. Mankind has digested meat for eons, plant foods are important but are not the sole answer. I respect your opinion but most certainly do not preach nor think anyone has that right, either.
"Meat diseases?" They are only a consideration / problem w/out balancing. However, with a diet that includes ALL foods, they are nominal (to the point of non-exisitence). Generally accepted that only 'vegan extemists' use the term.
seekertrth 1 year ago
@Chrisisms BTW, if you are so extremely opposed to meat and, by extension, hunting, why are you watching this and posting? Unless it's only to preach at other people.
seekertrth 1 year ago
@smallblocksupercharg J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2007 Jun;70(12):1014-9.
Quantification of the neurotoxic beta-carboline harmane in barbecued/grilled meat samples and correlation with level of doneness. Harmane, one of the heterocyclic amines (HCAs), is a potent neurotoxin linked to human diseases. Dietary exposure, especially in cooked meats, is the major source of exogenous exposure for humans. harmane concentration was highest in chicken (8.48 +/- 9.86 ng/g)
Chrisisms 1 year ago
glad your using an atl atl instead of a gun
TheLobster94 1 year ago 7
Great shot, I'm glad you ate the bird. Emu chili sounds good.
southtexasatlatl 2 years ago
@southtexasatlatl Up to 30% of middle-aged adults have 1 or more colon polyps. Constipation causes polyps.-Colon Polyps Health Byte (YouTube)
The prevalence of chronic constipation was 17.5%. J Pediatr 1998 Dec;74(6):451.
Self-reported constipation did not reliably identify functional constipation or outlet delay..prevalence was 40.1%. 1996, 91: 19-25.
Systematic review of the literature shows constipation prevalence from 0.7% to 29.6%. Arch Dis Child. 1996; 75: 367.
Chrisisms 1 year ago
I guess I was trying to emphasize a moot point in anthropology by taking an animal with a 2,500 year old flint "Marcus" point lashed to a seven foot dart with sinew and held in place with pine pitch. The birds aren't tame, they're horribly in-bred though. They have several hundred. They are for sale too...$50 a piece. They have a rocket net and a trailer.
bennettcrow 2 years ago
@bennettcrow great shot man..ive taken many deer with atlatls.amazing with obsidian tips weapon and very effictive..my next step..buffalo with atlatl..
5tonyvvvv 1 year ago
@bennettcrow its mute not moot
JaceMullen 1 year ago
@bennettcrow no need to justify it. There's always some purpose in reviving and practicing ancient techniques
YossarianTheMeerkat 1 year ago
ha nice vid as long as u eat em it dosent matter to me if u kill em
aspenarcheryusa 2 years ago
fuck your a hard cunt throwing sticks at birds dont you no that is a australian native animal you fucken hill billy inbred cunt
folksey123 2 years ago
@folksey123 Can you write what you meant in English please?
DeathByCactus 1 year ago
@folksey123 - You are clearly an idiot.
survivalpodcasting 1 year ago
@folksey123 Shush child
chillnshred 1 year ago
@folksey123 ~sighs~
Another rude moron that can't even speak without using curse words like an inbred child!
seekertrth 1 year ago
My two sons and I have taken to hunting with AtlAtl instead of bows. We stay together and the three of us try to throw at the same time/target to reduce suffering on the game. In a break with primitive tradition, I also carry some modern items to kill game if spears don't do it quickly enough. We've taken a couple of pigs and some turkeys this year.
jjbad12 2 years ago
emu chili?...sounds good
bugg255 2 years ago
where was this video taken
aspenarcheryusa 2 years ago
are you allowed to hunt emus? seems weird.........
flamedrag18 2 years ago