Shale gas and oil deposits found in the UK,Western Europe and USA combined with technology like this,could make us independent of the OPEC block in 10 years.
That's why it's called an Edison car and not a Tesla car. Unfortunately, Tesla was forgotten because of big corporation interests. They are still doing so now
While I appreciate what these guys are doing there is absolutely zero chance that this tin foil car will ever be put into production, which I was led to believe was the express purpose of the Xprize, to spur makers to produce sellable efficient cars.
They have no plans to mass produce this car.
Aptera on the other hand does, but they went home without a penny.
I noticed that the pit crew places a reflective sheet over the cabin between runs. Obviously this means that there's no climate control in the car. it is far from a production-ready vehicle if such basics are absent. The additional amenities that would be necessarily added to the car to directly compete with other production vehicles would potentially severely impact its efficiency, possibly canceling out much of its potential. The winners are probably not indicative of future viable cars.
@OghamTheBold A very light weight vehicle = safety. A large weight vehicle will transfer the energy of collision into the other vehicle causing it to change its direction and velocity. The severe injuries result due rapid deceleration of the human body in a high velocity head on collision. The central nervous system is injured, and thorasic organs are damaged upon impact with the internal cavity wall of the body. Thus, suddenly stopping after traveling at high velocities is often lethal.
@DRAGONRFORMULA Light weight vehicles = safety. Its large quantity of forces impacting the human body or very rapid deceleration that causes severe injury.
@OghamTheBold Thats only true if a lighter car comes to a sudden stop where the heavier vehicles imparts large quantity of force to the human body causing internal injuries. If a driver or passenger in a large SUV or truck traveling at high velocities comes to a sudden stop , the internal organs and brain will collide with their body's skeletal structure causing severe injury to the brain or internal organs.
Wonderful!! You know what they say- Insecure people have to drive the high horsepower sexy cars. Who will drive this one? I would love one- right now-
my march 1989 scientific american has the GM sunraycer on the cover and the article states on page 92 the sunraycer prototype had the lowest drag coefficient for a land vehicle every measured in the GM wind tunnel- 0.125. so i think the VLC is in very good company!
Shale gas and oil deposits found in the UK,Western Europe and USA combined with technology like this,could make us independent of the OPEC block in 10 years.
celticstones 2 months ago
the best thing would be to use this to build a large car that's lighter. mpg should not trump comfort of ride or seating.
circusboy90210 7 months ago
weight and safety,look at F1 and indy cars,light weight and safer then any production car.
inagod 7 months ago
I love this car,its great as is.
inagod 7 months ago
i hope so
ThePappy61 9 months ago
Why was Tesla not there?
DBSpy1 11 months ago
@DBSpy1 tesla sucks
circusboy90210 7 months ago
That's why it's called an Edison car and not a Tesla car. Unfortunately, Tesla was forgotten because of big corporation interests. They are still doing so now
sumocom 1 year ago
Due to their weight many things are possible - lighter bridges (cheaper and safer bridges)
They don't wear roads so much (cheaper road maintenance)
City parking systems could easily lift them (ultra high density parking)
Shame we can't have a switch over day
OghamTheBold 1 year ago
I'm so disappointed.
While I appreciate what these guys are doing there is absolutely zero chance that this tin foil car will ever be put into production, which I was led to believe was the express purpose of the Xprize, to spur makers to produce sellable efficient cars.
They have no plans to mass produce this car.
Aptera on the other hand does, but they went home without a penny.
??????
AshtonPhoto 1 year ago
I noticed that the pit crew places a reflective sheet over the cabin between runs. Obviously this means that there's no climate control in the car. it is far from a production-ready vehicle if such basics are absent. The additional amenities that would be necessarily added to the car to directly compete with other production vehicles would potentially severely impact its efficiency, possibly canceling out much of its potential. The winners are probably not indicative of future viable cars.
XUKMUSIC 1 year ago
i don't like that it runs on conventional fuel, but the car and the people involved init are great.
OghamTheBold: SUV are dangerous. they must pay for and build their own roads. and pay heavily on insurance too.
mahatmaBit 1 year ago
can we invest in the company??
Quantumjolt 1 year ago
Efficiency = lighter = less safe in collision with SUV's and trucks
So for safety - for efficiency - these cars just need their own lanes
OghamTheBold 1 year ago
@OghamTheBold SUVs will be too expensive to drive. Trucks too...
ingeborgsjon 1 year ago
@OghamTheBold A very light weight vehicle = safety. A large weight vehicle will transfer the energy of collision into the other vehicle causing it to change its direction and velocity. The severe injuries result due rapid deceleration of the human body in a high velocity head on collision. The central nervous system is injured, and thorasic organs are damaged upon impact with the internal cavity wall of the body. Thus, suddenly stopping after traveling at high velocities is often lethal.
chroniclerofthe70s 8 months ago
@chroniclerofthe70s
So "light weight car = lack of safety" because of this energy transfer (unfortunately).
DRAGONRFORMULA 6 months ago
@DRAGONRFORMULA Light weight vehicles = safety. Its large quantity of forces impacting the human body or very rapid deceleration that causes severe injury.
chroniclerofthe70s 6 months ago
@chroniclerofthe70s
I think we say the same thing in a different way.
light weight car = lower inertia = less energy in case of impact = safety
BUT
light weight car VS. heavy car in case of an impact = less safety (for the light weight car).
This is what I mean.
DRAGONRFORMULA 6 months ago
@OghamTheBold Thats only true if a lighter car comes to a sudden stop where the heavier vehicles imparts large quantity of force to the human body causing internal injuries. If a driver or passenger in a large SUV or truck traveling at high velocities comes to a sudden stop , the internal organs and brain will collide with their body's skeletal structure causing severe injury to the brain or internal organs.
chroniclerofthe70s 6 months ago
I would buy it I hope it won't cost much.
boonpole84 1 year ago
Wonderful!! You know what they say- Insecure people have to drive the high horsepower sexy cars. Who will drive this one? I would love one- right now-
EarthREALTOR 1 year ago
Genius !!!!!! When will these be available to the Mass public?
kriminalrecordz 1 year ago
Congratulations to the Edison2 team. Also 1:07 looks like the cars from the old cartoon Speed Racer.
CuervoBlack06 1 year ago
I would drive that thing across the country and not even sweat it
slarmas 1 year ago
my march 1989 scientific american has the GM sunraycer on the cover and the article states on page 92 the sunraycer prototype had the lowest drag coefficient for a land vehicle every measured in the GM wind tunnel- 0.125. so i think the VLC is in very good company!
floydatatata 1 year ago