trying to pass my psychology clep test in 3 days... reading the psychology textbook and using the lectures to supplement... its great... *i hope i pass*
Are basic instinct's spread across the cortex like memory and the like, or are they localized in any specific region of the brain? Can the basic instincts of a species be nullified or re-written through conditioning over a period of several generations via control of the enviromental stimulation, or producing a need for "mental evolution" like the physical adaptations of darwin's finch's? not as such to develope new behaviour by which to satisfy instinct's or in response to these instinct's,
I thank you professor for your understanding and your style of teaching. I was having difficulty in simply reading my text and having no tangible lecture with my professor.
Good lecture, but you do your students a grave disservice by perpetuating the myth of the intermediary mind. The mind does not consist of variables, and therefore, does not qualify as a falsifiable focus of study. Do read "On Behaviorism" carefully. Cognitive science belongs in the trash pile of scientific endeavor, much like spontaneous generation.
so you - at 21 - know better than a person who is an expert in the field of social cognition and who has probably read that book more times than you have?
even the behaviourists accepted the notion of 'private events' - this is the activities of what we might call 'mind'. not only did they accept their existence (even if they didn't accord them special status), at least Skinner was very clear on how important it was to understand such events in order to understand the public events.
@psychobollox I know that, to Skinner, internal states constitute reactions to stimuli, not causes of action. So in that sense, behaviorists accept internal states but reject the causal mind. Internal states can be useful for inferring in the hypothetical sense, but cannot inform a functional assessment of why a person acts as they do. In education particularly, traditional notions of 'expanding the mind' either fail to work as planned or cannot demonstrate their successes empirically.
i know that mental events cannot be objectively studied but they are still useful as bases for the hypotheses that come out of a functional behavioural assessment. The behaviourist tradition doesn't reject the notion of a causal mind entirely (at least, Skinner's way of doing it doesn't). The point is that an emotional reaction to something can very much influence a person's behavioural response to some event ... as can some belief about some event. These things need to be studied.
" In education particularly, traditional notions of 'expanding the mind' either fail to work as planned or cannot demonstrate their successes empirically."
I'd say that such things are difficult to verify empirically, because the outcomes are difficult to operationalise. Doesn't make them impossible- just difficult.
On educational outcomes, Bloom's taxonomy is a pretty good way of operationalising things in very behaviourally-oriented terms.
Very welcome. Many have criticised his taxonomy purely because it is oriented towards behavioural evidence, but - since we cannot directly observe learning in the mentalistic sense - we have to infer it from what people do as a result of that learning. And what people do is basically behaviour.
Seems fitting to me, then, that we should look for behavioural evidence of learning.
@psychobollox In my admittedly shallow experience with teaching, I've found that the best students also receive the most reinforcement from the studies they pursue, whether as a result of faculty encouragement or effective self management. In the US especially, administrators and educators must reassess how education is delivered and what purpose it serves. It seems to me that learning should function more as a public service than a competitive arena.
"I've found that the best students also receive the most reinforcement from the studies they pursue, whether as a result of faculty encouragement or effective self management."
Yes. Intrinsic reinforcement. Goes a long way!
"In the US especially, administrators and educators must reassess how education is delivered and what purpose it serves. It seems to me that learning should function more as a public service than a competitive arena."
Is the term generalization gradient is right only for cases where the stimulus is similar to the conditioned stimulus or it is also true of other stimuli the animal may see in the environment such as the examiner who brings the food?
maturation has to do with society and sociocultural learning. here the conditioning learning are the laws to the foundations of our emotional lives. whatever we experience such as being hurt, we'll tend to stay away from relationships. no reinforcements, no responses. truly psychologically relative.
i think because learning is resulting from experience while maturation is merely to do with age, the length of time development has been occurring for
I would tend to agree, but that can be problematic to define properly. Can you really imagine a form of maturation in which there is no experience? What part of learning is kids just growing up? Unanswerable question probably.
I would think of it in terms of mental and or emotional development. Learning can be thought of as acquiring knowledge; maturation is mental and emotional development.
Maybe I am jumping ahead, but could the CS and US examples with food and bell be also transposed to a alcoholic model in which a persons drinking and effecr steadily increases and then ceases drinking and starts into "recovery"? The extinction phase as recovery. and relearn phase as the relapse?
there is a conditioning element to this, and the biological element of this phenomenon may be that a person has a vulnerability to being easily reinforced in drinking behaviour by the amount of dopamine released whilst drinking. it's much more complicated than can be expounded on in this space. but essentially, you are thinking along the right lines, certainly as far as a purely behavioural model goes.
trying to pass my psychology clep test in 3 days... reading the psychology textbook and using the lectures to supplement... its great... *i hope i pass*
siempresola77 3 weeks ago
h8 .........' wv '
agyjoah 1 month ago
<3
agyjoah 1 month ago
3 people dont likes work and lecture
calvinbush1 2 months ago
Yeah very nice. Useful and educational.
agapitoflores001 2 months ago
Thanks for the upload!
thantawa 2 months ago
Great lecture...good information...clear explanation.
orangenassau 5 months ago
"to the *idea* of the stimulus".. like when you think of eating a lemon yeah? :D
pyreflynight 8 months ago
i went through 5 lectures in 5 some hrs.. Motivation?
Nisar1124 8 months ago
thanks so much
AFFIRMATIONS1 9 months ago
thankx
bishopk56 1 year ago
but the removal or introduction of the instinct's themselves? (hunger, reproductive instincts)
SP8CECADET 1 year ago
Are basic instinct's spread across the cortex like memory and the like, or are they localized in any specific region of the brain? Can the basic instincts of a species be nullified or re-written through conditioning over a period of several generations via control of the enviromental stimulation, or producing a need for "mental evolution" like the physical adaptations of darwin's finch's? not as such to develope new behaviour by which to satisfy instinct's or in response to these instinct's,
SP8CECADET 1 year ago
lol i was watchin the cheeseburger josh video while listenin to this.
went along kinda good in some parts haha
anangryfrenchpastry2 1 year ago
I thank you professor for your understanding and your style of teaching. I was having difficulty in simply reading my text and having no tangible lecture with my professor.
rscott932 1 year ago
Very good presentation of the material. Are any of the slides available to download? I'd really like to add some of them to my notes.
dasgh0stryt3r 1 year ago
Good lecture, but you do your students a grave disservice by perpetuating the myth of the intermediary mind. The mind does not consist of variables, and therefore, does not qualify as a falsifiable focus of study. Do read "On Behaviorism" carefully. Cognitive science belongs in the trash pile of scientific endeavor, much like spontaneous generation.
gtrgy888 1 year ago
@gtrgy888
so you - at 21 - know better than a person who is an expert in the field of social cognition and who has probably read that book more times than you have?
give me a bloody break!
psychobollox 1 year ago
@gtrgy888
even the behaviourists accepted the notion of 'private events' - this is the activities of what we might call 'mind'. not only did they accept their existence (even if they didn't accord them special status), at least Skinner was very clear on how important it was to understand such events in order to understand the public events.
psychobollox 1 year ago
@psychobollox I know that, to Skinner, internal states constitute reactions to stimuli, not causes of action. So in that sense, behaviorists accept internal states but reject the causal mind. Internal states can be useful for inferring in the hypothetical sense, but cannot inform a functional assessment of why a person acts as they do. In education particularly, traditional notions of 'expanding the mind' either fail to work as planned or cannot demonstrate their successes empirically.
gtrgy888 1 year ago
@gtrgy888
i know that mental events cannot be objectively studied but they are still useful as bases for the hypotheses that come out of a functional behavioural assessment. The behaviourist tradition doesn't reject the notion of a causal mind entirely (at least, Skinner's way of doing it doesn't). The point is that an emotional reaction to something can very much influence a person's behavioural response to some event ... as can some belief about some event. These things need to be studied.
psychobollox 1 year ago
@gtrgy888
" In education particularly, traditional notions of 'expanding the mind' either fail to work as planned or cannot demonstrate their successes empirically."
I'd say that such things are difficult to verify empirically, because the outcomes are difficult to operationalise. Doesn't make them impossible- just difficult.
On educational outcomes, Bloom's taxonomy is a pretty good way of operationalising things in very behaviourally-oriented terms.
psychobollox 1 year ago
@psychobollox Thanks for the recommendation.
gtrgy888 1 year ago
@gtrgy888
Very welcome. Many have criticised his taxonomy purely because it is oriented towards behavioural evidence, but - since we cannot directly observe learning in the mentalistic sense - we have to infer it from what people do as a result of that learning. And what people do is basically behaviour.
Seems fitting to me, then, that we should look for behavioural evidence of learning.
psychobollox 1 year ago
@psychobollox In my admittedly shallow experience with teaching, I've found that the best students also receive the most reinforcement from the studies they pursue, whether as a result of faculty encouragement or effective self management. In the US especially, administrators and educators must reassess how education is delivered and what purpose it serves. It seems to me that learning should function more as a public service than a competitive arena.
gtrgy888 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@gtrgy888
"I've found that the best students also receive the most reinforcement from the studies they pursue, whether as a result of faculty encouragement or effective self management."
Yes. Intrinsic reinforcement. Goes a long way!
"In the US especially, administrators and educators must reassess how education is delivered and what purpose it serves. It seems to me that learning should function more as a public service than a competitive arena."
Same goes for the UK, where I'm from.
psychobollox 1 year ago
dude thanks so much this isone thing i want to learn the others are history and politics
falloutgodTeutonicL 1 year ago
Is the term generalization gradient is right only for cases where the stimulus is similar to the conditioned stimulus or it is also true of other stimuli the animal may see in the environment such as the examiner who brings the food?
kiob 2 years ago
excellent work!
1888junkteam 2 years ago 12
is a phobia considered a learning experience if you do not count learning by injury as learning?
alsamarino 2 years ago
Science RULZ...
Kick Some Ass with Psychology. Learning How people think and how you think, is key.
The Study of the Mind and Soul. Awesome.
UserIsAnFBIAgent 2 years ago
OMG that guy's voice is awesome!
plm123456123 2 years ago 3
I'm salivating just hearing about classical conditioning.
kiminokami 2 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
homo
5t4ytru3 2 years ago
@kiminokami
lol
inthebehljahr 2 years ago
thanks......so much better than my current professor.......
buenotc 2 years ago 3
mark: 32:25
buenotc 2 years ago
Comment removed
MIProductions1 2 years ago
maturation has to do with society and sociocultural learning. here the conditioning learning are the laws to the foundations of our emotional lives. whatever we experience such as being hurt, we'll tend to stay away from relationships. no reinforcements, no responses. truly psychologically relative.
kingjohnkk 2 years ago
Very good lecture.
chrisrobertgray 2 years ago 20
"Maturation isn't learning". Interesting. Really? How can maturation properly be distinguished from learning?
captainirrelevant 2 years ago 3
i think because learning is resulting from experience while maturation is merely to do with age, the length of time development has been occurring for
CocoMac877 2 years ago
I would tend to agree, but that can be problematic to define properly. Can you really imagine a form of maturation in which there is no experience? What part of learning is kids just growing up? Unanswerable question probably.
captainirrelevant 2 years ago
aye its like most things, u can make generalisations, bt its never actually that clear cut
CocoMac877 2 years ago
I would think of it in terms of mental and or emotional development. Learning can be thought of as acquiring knowledge; maturation is mental and emotional development.
reason285 2 years ago
How? With SCIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIENCE!
kiminokami 2 years ago
Maybe I am jumping ahead, but could the CS and US examples with food and bell be also transposed to a alcoholic model in which a persons drinking and effecr steadily increases and then ceases drinking and starts into "recovery"? The extinction phase as recovery. and relearn phase as the relapse?
isegoria1 3 years ago 3
@isegoria1
there is a conditioning element to this, and the biological element of this phenomenon may be that a person has a vulnerability to being easily reinforced in drinking behaviour by the amount of dopamine released whilst drinking. it's much more complicated than can be expounded on in this space. but essentially, you are thinking along the right lines, certainly as far as a purely behavioural model goes.
psychobollox 1 year ago
@psychobollox Thanks for taking the time to respond to my question - it is appreciated.
isegoria1 1 year ago