Added: 3 years ago
From: 11septembervideos
Views: 4,091
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (67)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • watch?v=nJ6_WBwgNuM

    it reminds something to you?

  • Flag

  • 9/11 = Inside Job

  • Ok no one heard explosives before or during the collapse of WTC 7. Not entirely true but I could buy that, sure. Did anyone hear this internal progressive collapse? 47 stories of crumbling building would make a lot of noise too and, I bet, would have been picked up on seismic recordings. So where are the witnesses testifying to the sounds of internal collapse before it becomes outwardly obvious?

  • It's just amazing how insulting it feels to be fed this load of horse shit

    example", We really have a new kind of collapse here

  • This video is for the sheeple who will believe anything.

  • gotta love how stupid and easy to fool you dumb americans are.

    You were attacked!

    This is not a conspiracy! And the people making the conspiracy are fucking traitors to your country! No wonder your economy is crumbling, when most of the country is retarded conspiracy fanatics!!

  • @glennemannen

    you are an idiot if you can look at all the evidence and not know it was an inside job.

    Do some fucking research moron!

  • Zero chance this scenario is true. WTC 7 achieved free fall acceleration as evidenced by the Chandler videos, therefore explosives and or incendiary devices must have been used. Evidence of incendiaries was found as described in the peer reviewed Harrit paper. This is a very slick video, produced by persons who have sold their souls. No amount of money could make me do this.

  • What kind of furniture burns for 7 hours and reaches temperature that causes steel columns to fail ? Just let me know so I don't buy something like that... Or we could recommend it to power plants as an excellent source of energy...

  • @jorgen180 .. you'd be referring to fossil fuels. Nearly all modern building materials, furnishing and fittings are manufactured from petroleum based synthetics. Even windows are coated in synthetic polymers to filter UV radiation.

  • What kind of furniture burns for 7 hours and reaches temperature that causes steel columns to fail ? Just let me know so I don't buy something like that... Or we could recommend it to power plants as an excellent source of energy...

  • In its draft report, released in August 2008, NIST attempted to cover up evidence that WTC7 fell at freefall, but the coverup was transparent. In its final report, released in November 2008, NIST finally acknowledged freefall, but couched it in a bizarre framework that continues to deny its clear significance.

    watch?v=V0GHVEKrhng

  • [NICSTAR 1A 3.6]"constant, downward acceleration during this time interval. This acceleration was 32f/s^2,(9.8m/s^2), equivalent to the ACCELERATION OF GRAVITY."

    "free fall acceleration can ONLY occur when there is NO STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS BELOW IT"

    - Shyam Sunder, NIST lead investigator (Q&A briefing).

  • "we really have a new kind of collapse that we have discovered here which is a fire induced progressive collapse."

    wow.

    really?

  • how in the world

  • what a bunch of disinformation

  • if it would happen as they they saiy in this video,

    it would have collapsed one side to the other,

    not simmetrical, fucking liers

  • 0:21 the windows crack because of the crank in the middle..

    seriously i can't understand how anyone can believe the governament

    Anybody who says "It's not an inside job"

    Is either in denial, or trying to cover the truth..

  • WTC 7 was a controlled demolition team from a montreal

  • No 130db  explosion , well you must have never seen this footage .

    watch?v=NL91DdZyVPg

  • there is a video of two INS agents on a pay phone close to 7 prior to it's 'collapse' when BAM!!!!! sounds about 130 decibels to me (sic.). i feel bad for the victim's families. they died due to other's love of money. i truly hope there is a hell for these shitbirds

  • i just dont people some time... IT GOT HIT BY A PLANE. get over it

  • You know what they say about computers

    "bullshit IN = bullshit OUT"

    I smell a lot of bullshit here

  • ooooooooooh

    so thats why building 7 collapsed

    coff (BS) coff

    hope the new building arent being built with steel and concrete cos they r jus asking 4 mo collapses if they r

    rofl

  • LMAO! thats what i tell people!

  • im glad i dont know any im a liberal dumbass i buy into every little thing i hear. bush is bad.9/11 was a set up. omg jfk had 2 shooters. shut the fuck up. until you have any real proof not just maybes ill listen til then shut the fuck up

  • considering that silverstien admitted to "pulling" the building on pbs, The cover up this sack of shit is spilling is simply rediculous.

  • the only whistleblowing witness is dead now. He was inside and reported exlosions. Rumor has it his love of fried foods killed him.

  • This is the biggest bunch of BS I have ever heard. If you buy into this lie you are an idiot.

  • I continue to be amazed at what people in positions of power will say and do for money.

    Why didn't building #5 fall? There was plenty of fire in that building...oh that was different, excuse me.

    We are on the eve of perhaps the darkest day in American History. Peace to all who believe in freedom, liberty, free speech, and the 2nd amendment. I hope that God has not stopped blessing Amercia.

  • and what files were stored in building 7???? that may make you question who was behind 9 11

  • They were on stock market corruption, many investigations, info on who and what, DESTROYED, gone.Evidence of the 2.3 trillion missing from the pentagon that Rumsfeld spoke of on 9/10/01 GONE. The "plane" hit the exact spot of the pentagon that had the info and the accountants who were investigating. How much do you need before you stop defending these ASSHOLES. Now why did the Marriot in Pakistan not collapse? It's fire was 10 x's worse than that in #7. Barry Jennings is now dead, how much more?

  • OH, it's you. Have you ever heard of a shredding party??? That's where people get together and shred files they don't want seen. I've never heard of anyone, anywhere being stupid enough to take out a multi million dollar building just to destroy files. Do you honestly listen to yourself before you talk???

    The CIA or the military doesn't need to destroy one of it's own buildings to destroy files, that's rediculous. They would just order the papers and files destroyed, shredded, burned.

  • Files come in many forms you dope. It's not the sixties anymore. You have to destroy the computers to get rid of evidence, duh. There are many reasons why it was brought down, info on insider trading and the 2.3 trillion missing from the pentagon is just a couple.

  • Wow, you are truly a dipshit. You would not destroy the entire building to destroy computers. You can simply shock them with a dephibulator then, bam, nothing left. The 2.3 is not lost, it was untraced. That's not lost, dude, that means it went somewhere classified. Dipshit.

  • It's "defibulator" you mental midget. Rumsfeld announced on 9/10/01 that 2.3 trillion WAS MISSING, you fruitcake. Look it up, it's all there on tape, "The Don" telling all at a conference that we have an "enemy within the pentagon". "Went somewhere classified", get out of your military fantasyland you freak.

  • Blah, made because I made you rethink your computer bullshit??? It's okay, your an idiot.

  • You made do what? That's all you got? You are a major poser.

  • Sorry meant mad. Anyway, do you have any common sense??? We are talking about a government agencies that can make people disappear if they wanted to and you don't think they can destroy files and computers without destroying a whole fucking building???? Are you completely ignorant or are you just completely retarded??? Let me guess, in your world if you want to destroy a newspaper you burn your whole house, right???

  • O NOES BIG CRAZY GUVERNMANTS CUMINGZ TO GET CHEW.. grow up - stop flexing your tiny epeen

  • Like he says a very rare event,never happened before -- but look not that rare this was the third building to collaspe that day because of fire. the Towers were the first two. I guess we can expect buildings to start falling because of fire all the time now since they have now discovered that it is possible.

  • What a load of crap

  • im not sure if i should take this video seriously or as some sort of sick joke.. but really, i wonder if Obama will or would, ever hold anyone who was actually involved and responsible for this

  • Why would he? He's part of the same elite crew who were behind this fiasco. They are the ones who put him in the Presidency, so he's never going to do a damned thing to bring them to justice. He'll sit there like a good boy and do as he's told, just like McCain would have if he was the chosen one.

    The American people need to wake up and realize that we're being jerked around. WE THE PEOPLE meanbs nothing anymore. We don't control our government, the wealthy elite of the world do.

  • What does N*I*S*T stand for?

    Not Interested in Science or Technology

    Neo-cons Scared of Truth

    Never Indict the State for Treason

    Nail Islam, Stage Terror

    Nazi Institute of Scare Tactics

    No Investigation Surrounding Thermite

    Newton Irrelevant to Sunder's Thesis

  • Go fire fighters for 911 truth dott org, this will show it all, go 911 research and read the testimony of firefighters and ambulance workers that heard and felt explosions

  • Many people in America believe earth is 6,000 years old. The US sheeple will eat anything.

  • Bogus. This is P O L I T I C S, PRETENDING TO BE SCIENCE. NIST has become a junk science agency. Another sad sign of a nation in decay.

  • Thanks for putting this on the record, although I disagree with NIST, they at least left us with a nice CBS video.

  • lies

    lies

    more lies

    thanks a LOT NIST

  • sham sunder is indeed bare ass naked on this one

    even their tweaked animation doens't resemble the real world footage of the collapse at all.

    that alone shows his bare ass nakedness

    never mind the fact that he ignored the sulfurization of beam members reported in FEMA report.

    this is a farce

  • That's a lie, the sprinklers were off before the water main break.

  • Can someone please tell mister Shyam Sunder he's not wearing any clothes...

  • 911veritas, here's a video of WTC-7 where you can hear a loud explosion just seconds before the building falls:

    27minutes, 45seconds in:

    tinyurlDOTcom/5swnld

    Sham has some 'splainin' to do!!

  • Crap, crap, and more crap.

  • They may be developing better whitewash and using more of it-but that doesn't alter the fact that it is-well, whitewash.

  • Sunder explained that his group did NOT look for residues of explosives, since this was a technical investigation, and not a criminal investigation. The owner, Lucky Larry, is probably very happy that it was not in the 20 million dollar charter of the NIST investigation to look for any signs of a criminal act. In fact, Larry Silversteins office was one of the first people to congratulate NIST for its excellent work; right after this report came out, 7 years after the building was destroyed.

  • Dr Shyam Sunder received his doctorial degree from MIT in 1981. He has stated that the molten metal could have easily been formed through the fires that continued under the rubble since, he said, the heat would not dissipate, but would irradiate back.

    In the interest of resolving this burning issue, I suggest that his professors at MIT show us experimentally how this is possible in an oxygen starved environment, while pouring "a lake" of water onto it, as were the true conditions. 911Truth !

  • The first time my Bic lighter or stove collapses due to this thermal expansion theory, or when my physics professor in a college laboratory can explain it to me reasonably from a text book as a sound scientific principle/experiment, I will believe. lol

  • So if we only need to take out one column to make the whole building collapse at free fall speed, are we waisting all the explosives we use to bring down buildings in controlled demolitions? And this column wasn't even below ground level like most implosions due to explosives, so it could get at the infra structure or the base supports. This could be a new type of demolition.

    And one more question, wasn't there molten steel under the building? For days after? How did they explain that?

  • It's amazing how programmers can make computers lie.

    Reminds me of the Purdue Pentagon jet simulation and the NOVA lies about WTC 1 & 2.

  • That was good mommy, can we watch Jack and the beanstalk now?

  • what about firefighters and others filmed while close explosions occur, the Silverstein mysterious confession "they decided to pull it", molten iron in the basements, intact walls and edges of buildings next to it, other WTC buildings still standing, the appendix C of FEMA 703 report, the Jones scientific adress to the NIST, the CNN/BBCWorld pre-announcement of the collapse, the evacuation orders despite no warnings, the unexplained softing iron 100th of d° below usual charts.... stinky stuff!

  • What about all the outside walls? What kind of chain reaction makes all the columns fail simultaneously? The NIST report only raises more questions. It doesn't provide answers for anything. Shyam Sunder is a traitor, and should be treated as such.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more