Evidence on fake photos in mission Apollo 11: Part 3

[bimbomcgee]

PLEASE SEARCH YOU TUBE THE ANSWER IS THERE, I FOUND IT, IT SCARES THE HELL OUTA ME, PLEASE SEARCH YOUTUBE, PLEASE SEARCH YOUTUBE, PLEASE. STOP FIGHTING AND UNITE YOUR BOTH RIGHT, THE TRUTH IS KNEE SHAKING. BUT I PROMISE YOU'LL FIND IT, JUST THINK OF THE INTERNET AS GIANT COMPUTER NOT A MAGIC EIGHT BALL , LESS WORDS, COMPUTER DOESN'T NEED GRAMMER, LAST TIME, YOU WON'T BE ABLE TO HANDLE THE TRUTH, I DON'T THINK ANYONE WILL.

[LlamaAirline]

Watch the Moon episode of Mythbusters

[hunchbacked]

@LlamaAirline

Not only I have watched the episodes of the Mythbusters, but I have even made a video to show what's wrong with their demonstrations.

[Daddyo930]

No need to worry about photos. Gamma ray bursts, galactic cosmic rays, solar flares and the solar wind make any manned mission past 300 miles without electromagnetic shielding a suicide mission. You won't even make it half way to the moon.

[hunchbacked]

@Daddyo930

You are right; but I also as an aerospace engineer that there's no way that the LM could have landed on the moon without having been seriously tested.

Without air, it does not fly at all like a plane; it does not benefit of the horizontal and vertical forces created by air; that means that controlling it to land on the moon (starting from a horizontal speed of around 6000km/h) was extremely difficult, and doing it without having seriously tested the LM before was plain suicide.

[hunchbacked]

@Daddyo930

But finding all the incoherencies which have intentionally be put into the photos and videos is fun.

They have created meny geometrical demonstrations showing incoherencies, it was a game for them sabotaging the project; it was their revenge against the CIA who forced them to fake the project AGAINST THEIR CONSENT!

[hunchbacked]

@Daddyo930

The computer and all the electronic interfaces have also been sabotaged; the computer is completely delirious, insane, and all the electronic interfaces contain errors, some very imaginative.

The description of the flight is full of jokes, and anything technical has been sabotaged.

And despite that the moon hoaxers are still called idiots and wackos.

It's the world upside down when those who open their eyes are called idiots.

[Daddyo930]

@hunchbacked I believe someone said "You can't go there and come back if your dead". Or something like that. That person was probably a physicist or at least had some rudimentary understanding of the cosmic forces at work in our solar system. Those who still cling to the fairytale believe that radiation in space is no big deal. Surviveable. Numbers don't lie, people do.

[dopje31857]

gonetoplaid has wrecked your hoax hunchbacked

[hunchbacked]

@dopje31857

No, he has not.

There are many things you don't understand about spatial geometry, perspective, optics, photography.

[dopje31857]

yes i don't understand

but there is one thing i do understand

and that is that gonetoplaid wrecked your hoax

[hunchbacked]

@dopje31857

Yes, of course.

That's why he has been unable to debunk most of my claims!

[abdullah1430]

Thanks I totally agree

[GoneToPlaid]

5:44 Photos do NOT correspond. Aldrin in left photo is standing next to apex of horizontal and vertical landing strut junction shadow, whereas in photo AS11-40-5902 Aldrin is standing fairly close to the +Y footpad. Your conclusion at 6:14 is not logical.

[GoneToPlaid]

5:00 Hmm...I don't see nothing absurd at all. Astronaut swings up left arm to block solar glare. Left arm shadows astronaut's face and eyes. Kind of what you would expect, don't you think?

5:17 Its all a matter of correctly understanding perspective.

5:26 Look at positions of Armstrong and Aldrin in both photos. Armstrong should NOT be more to the left.

[GoneToPlaid]

4:40 Left hand, given the sun angle (deduced by the cast spacesuit shadow, easily will shadow the astronaut's face as seen in the right photo.

[GoneToPlaid]

4:27 Shadow changes from gray (side of suit) to black (left arm of suit) since the gray (hip side of suit) is flatter compared to the left arm of the suit, making the hip side of the suit somewhat more reflective due to the weave of the Teflon fabric. Width of shadow on arm is wider since arm in shadow area is not horizontal.

[GoneToPlaid]

3:10 Look carefully at the cast shadow at upper left of the left frame. You can see the shadow of the "bump" on the top left side of the PLSS backpack. Quite simply, the reason the helmet cover is in deep shadow is that it is completely shadowed by the top of the PLSS. So, there is nothing unusual or mysterious here.

3:28 Shadow length, measured from center of left foot to end of shadow, is longer in right photo compared to left photo -- not shorter.

[GoneToPlaid]

Before I continue, I have to admit that hunchbacked did produce a nice video. I love the music an nicely done titles for what its worth. :-)

[GoneToPlaid]

2:15 What? First, 5946 and 47, not 5046 and 47. Aside from the tilt-up antenna (not deployed) in 5946 and the same antenna (now swung up and deployed) in 5947, what "cartoon" character are you talking about -- especially since any said cartoon character isn't present in BOTH photos?

[GoneToPlaid]

1:34 The vertical stick (contact probe) appears more or less vertical, but in reality (see other photos) it is bent towards the camera position, making its shadow appear longer than it would be if it truly was closer to a vertical orientation.

1:48 5896, although still pointed at the footpad, was taken from about 3 feet towards the left. Look carefully at the metalized Mylar ripples on the leg in the high-res versions of these two photos.

[GoneToPlaid]

1:00 Look carefully at the perspective and angle of the right plume deflector, and look at how much is visible of the steerable S-band antenna in the two photos. It is a no-brainer to see that Armstrong stepped closer to the LM when he shot the second photo.

1:20 The perspective is noticeably different. Simply draw lines between the pair of footpads shown in each side-by-side photo which you show at 1:20.

[GoneToPlaid]

0:20 Armstrong didn't move down. He stepped closer to the LM. That is patently obvious by the increase in the relative size of the LM ascent module's back electronics bay cover.

0:51 Shifting the Earth in photo AS11-40-5924 is deliberately misleading. The Earth for all practical purposes is at infinity as far as the camera lens is concerned. As the original 5924 photo shows, the Earth is closer to the LM since Armstrong stepped closer to the LM.