1.3 Billion Dollars. The rocket lost power to the guidance control and veered of course. A self destruct signal was sent to the rocket and it was successfully destroyed without injury to any personnel.
I am very happy to see the vidoe An Air Force statement said the rocket began to self-destruct 40 seconds after it was launched from Space Launch Complex 41 from you, hopefully the others also are happy for You
I Love The Video An Air Force statement said the rocket began to self-destruct 40 seconds after it was launched from Space Launch Complex 41. It Can Increase My Knowledge
Nice Video An Air Force statement said the rocket began to self-destruct 40 seconds after it was launched from Space Launch Complex 41 That You Share , So Very Nice Thanks You
I Really Like The Video An Air Force statement said the rocket began to self-destruct 40 seconds after it was launched from Space Launch Complex 41. From Your
Your Video An Air Force statement said the rocket began to self-destruct 40 seconds after it was launched from Space Launch Complex 41.Is Very Useful Sharing
Bill Gates and other billionaires should finance a mission to Mars. That would really leave a legacy. Space travel is very worrying, beautiful and amazing. The film Contact really gets the essence of it, the feel, the build up.
@decemberdazzle Shuttle cost per flight was between 1.5 and 1.7 Billion and cost $3-5 billion per year for production and operations. The Shuttle program cost $200 Billion for 135 launches which does not adjust for inflation.
@ti994apc the Shuttles cost 1.7 billion to BUILD. I don't think they would cost that much to launch every time... from NASA's official site (just google if you don't believe me) says: "Q. How much does it cost to launch a Space Shuttle?
A. The average cost to launch a Space Shuttle is about $450 million per mission."
@decemberdazzle Launch is different than cost per flight. The Shuttle program was $200 billion and there were 135 flight which is 1.45 billion per flight. However, adjust for inflation on early flights and you get a higher number. "The average cost per launch was about $1.2 billion from 1982 to 2010. But it rises to $1.5 billion per flight when factoring in lifetime program costs, according to the new analysis, which covered the 131 shuttle missions flown between 1982 and 2010." Space.com
@ti994 None of the Shuttles lost (Columbia and Challenger) were replaced. They started out with 5 Shuttles and ended up with 3. NASA promised each launch would only cost $10 million per launch and we would have 50 launches per year. After 5 flights, it was clear that Shuttle was never going to come close to the cost NASA promised.
@ti994apc Actually, Endeavour was built to replace Challenger. according to the official NASA site. "Their names, in the order they were built, are Enterprise, Columbia, Challenger, Discovery, Atlantis, and Endeavour...Challenger was built as a vibration-test vehicle and then upgraded to become the second operational Shuttle. The Challenger and its seven-member crew were lost in a launch accident...Endeavour, built to replace Challenger, made its debut in May 1992..."
Thus, the universal vehicle will contains: 1).-the body strenght frame; 2).-the thermonuclear controlled reactor; 3).-coolling devices; 4).-reactive electromagnetic motors for drive force and for orientation. At this vehicle, with the steering-wheel or separate commands aid, we direct motors' traction force on any displacement way. The possibilitiys of adaptation and using such vehicles are unlimited in any domain: transport, energy, mining, agriculture,building, dwellings..
The test for nuclear fusion realisation on Tokamak's installations and with LASER cannot bring anything new for the energetics' future. I bind the thermonuclear controlled reactor schedule by the Sun model , by the reactive electromagnetic motor schedule from Palenque stone's tombe. You see the my project for thermonuclear controlled reactor.
I had thinked a proposal of realisation to one universal vehicle, good on Earth but and in cosmos. The source of energy is a thermonuclear controlled reactor, and the traction is realized through a set of reactive electromagnetic motors. The realization of these, impose a revision and elucidation to some parts from the actual science, which is strangled of the theoretical physics with a series of metaphysical laws and principles.
True ugowar, but they did send a selfdestruct 2 seconds afterwards to assure complete breakup.
A short circuit caused an outage of the guidance computer, which made it lose it's orientation relative to the earth. When it came back up it issued a pitch down command, which put it in an angle it wasn't built for. Causing an SRB to separate which caused the automatic self destruct.
Titan 4 was purposely blown up. There is video of the launch that shows an unidentified object apparently striking the Titan at an altitude of about 110,000 feet, shortly before the rocket blew up. They're Here.
@leavinghope1970 Sorry, but this rocket only reached 17,000 feet before it exploded. You should check for at least the obvious contradictions when you make up conspiratorial UFO nonsense like this.
I hate these dramatizations. They use unrealistic 'Hollywood' sound that arrives instantaneously, despite having originated several miles away. Reality shouldn't need a Foley artist.
They play the same ten seconds of footage over and over to stretch a short story into a long one. And then there are the factual errors...
@lithiumdeuteride Yes! I live near Cape Canaveral and I actually remember when this particular rocket exploded. I can tell you first hand that there was no big "Ka-Boom" sound. It was actually pretty quiet.
"Air Force control" sent no command whatsoever. The Inadvertent Separation Destruct System onboard the rocket initiated a self destruct (as the name suggests) when the physical links between the solid rocket boosters and the core were severed due to aerodynamic forces ripping them apart.
It was a completeley automatic destruct, the range safety officer only got to watch the fireworks, not push the red button.
I should add that exactly the same kind of destruct system also destroyed the first Ariane 5 rocket two years earlier which also suffered a guidance failure (but due to a software error), pitched down hard and air drag started ripping it apart.
Yes, it was. However, an Air Force report on the proposed Ares I manned launch vehicle claims that this Titan IV explosion may show that the Ares I's escape system isn't safe. The Titan explosion produced an enormous cloud of hot debris, and the report argues that if an Ares I blew up in this way, the escape system could not carry the manned capsule far enough to prevent the heat of the debris from melting the parachute material.
Incidentally, I found this video from an article in the Orlando Sentinel about that report (which also happens to be linked from Slashdot). Unfortunately, Youtube's comment restrictions prevent me from posting the URL's.
1.3 Billion Dollars. The rocket lost power to the guidance control and veered of course. A self destruct signal was sent to the rocket and it was successfully destroyed without injury to any personnel.
hdtvcamera1 1 week ago
@hdtvcamera1 Bad Data from me. I got this launch mixed up with another. My bad.
hdtvcamera1 1 week ago
I was born de day dis happened
thearrowsfan 1 week ago
I am very happy to see the vidoe An Air Force statement said the rocket began to self-destruct 40 seconds after it was launched from Space Launch Complex 41 from you, hopefully the others also are happy for You
Ondelendo 2 months ago
I Love The Video An Air Force statement said the rocket began to self-destruct 40 seconds after it was launched from Space Launch Complex 41. It Can Increase My Knowledge
bebeheuy 2 months ago
Nice Video An Air Force statement said the rocket began to self-destruct 40 seconds after it was launched from Space Launch Complex 41 That You Share , So Very Nice Thanks You
willamricard 2 months ago
I Really Like The Video An Air Force statement said the rocket began to self-destruct 40 seconds after it was launched from Space Launch Complex 41. From Your
imegatrone 2 months ago
Your Video An Air Force statement said the rocket began to self-destruct 40 seconds after it was launched from Space Launch Complex 41.Is Very Useful Sharing
bundawartini 2 months ago
Where was Jesus after all of this shit?
GTpanik 3 months ago
After all of the testing, all of the preparation, all of the expert guidance on this mission...
...they made one very expensive firework.
venescas 4 months ago
Bill Gates and other billionaires should finance a mission to Mars. That would really leave a legacy. Space travel is very worrying, beautiful and amazing. The film Contact really gets the essence of it, the feel, the build up.
Pentdad 5 months ago
rockets have self district in them now?
joshbulldog1661 6 months ago
Comment removed
ti994apc 7 months ago
Each Shuttle launch was 1.6 Billion dollars. So, each Shuttle loss was more expensive.
ti994apc 10 months ago
@ti994apc Actually, I believe it's 450 million, not 1.6 billion...
decemberdazzle 7 months ago
@decemberdazzle Shuttle cost per flight was between 1.5 and 1.7 Billion and cost $3-5 billion per year for production and operations. The Shuttle program cost $200 Billion for 135 launches which does not adjust for inflation.
ti994apc 7 months ago
@ti994apc the Shuttles cost 1.7 billion to BUILD. I don't think they would cost that much to launch every time... from NASA's official site (just google if you don't believe me) says: "Q. How much does it cost to launch a Space Shuttle?
A. The average cost to launch a Space Shuttle is about $450 million per mission."
decemberdazzle 7 months ago
@decemberdazzle Launch is different than cost per flight. The Shuttle program was $200 billion and there were 135 flight which is 1.45 billion per flight. However, adjust for inflation on early flights and you get a higher number. "The average cost per launch was about $1.2 billion from 1982 to 2010. But it rises to $1.5 billion per flight when factoring in lifetime program costs, according to the new analysis, which covered the 131 shuttle missions flown between 1982 and 2010." Space.com
ti994apc 7 months ago
@ti994 None of the Shuttles lost (Columbia and Challenger) were replaced. They started out with 5 Shuttles and ended up with 3. NASA promised each launch would only cost $10 million per launch and we would have 50 launches per year. After 5 flights, it was clear that Shuttle was never going to come close to the cost NASA promised.
ti994apc 7 months ago
@ti994apc Actually, Endeavour was built to replace Challenger. according to the official NASA site. "Their names, in the order they were built, are Enterprise, Columbia, Challenger, Discovery, Atlantis, and Endeavour...Challenger was built as a vibration-test vehicle and then upgraded to become the second operational Shuttle. The Challenger and its seven-member crew were lost in a launch accident...Endeavour, built to replace Challenger, made its debut in May 1992..."
decemberdazzle 7 months ago
@decemberdazzle True about Endeavor. I had forgotten about that.
ti994apc 7 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
Thus, the universal vehicle will contains: 1).-the body strenght frame; 2).-the thermonuclear controlled reactor; 3).-coolling devices; 4).-reactive electromagnetic motors for drive force and for orientation. At this vehicle, with the steering-wheel or separate commands aid, we direct motors' traction force on any displacement way. The possibilitiys of adaptation and using such vehicles are unlimited in any domain: transport, energy, mining, agriculture,building, dwellings..
sandustanBrasov 1 year ago
SandustanBrasov
The test for nuclear fusion realisation on Tokamak's installations and with LASER cannot bring anything new for the energetics' future. I bind the thermonuclear controlled reactor schedule by the Sun model , by the reactive electromagnetic motor schedule from Palenque stone's tombe. You see the my project for thermonuclear controlled reactor.
sandustanBrasov 1 year ago
• SandustanBrasov
I had thinked a proposal of realisation to one universal vehicle, good on Earth but and in cosmos. The source of energy is a thermonuclear controlled reactor, and the traction is realized through a set of reactive electromagnetic motors. The realization of these, impose a revision and elucidation to some parts from the actual science, which is strangled of the theoretical physics with a series of metaphysical laws and principles.
sandustanBrasov 1 year ago
True ugowar, but they did send a selfdestruct 2 seconds afterwards to assure complete breakup.
A short circuit caused an outage of the guidance computer, which made it lose it's orientation relative to the earth. When it came back up it issued a pitch down command, which put it in an angle it wasn't built for. Causing an SRB to separate which caused the automatic self destruct.
source:
globalsecurity org/space/library/news/1999/n19990119_990066.htm
PwnerPwnz 1 year ago
they could of used that money to house the poor!
runlassierun 1 year ago
@runlassierun
Yeah, smart one. Spend more tax payers money on the lazy. Socialist.
normanmj 1 year ago
@runlassierun The poor could get a job and work like the rest of us. Bad environment? then move away. You only get one life to do something.
artwleb 1 year ago
Pretty explosion...?
Malfaxi 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Now we know why we are foing broke.
indiasucksalways 1 year ago
Titan 4 was purposely blown up. There is video of the launch that shows an unidentified object apparently striking the Titan at an altitude of about 110,000 feet, shortly before the rocket blew up. They're Here.
leavinghope1970 1 year ago
@leavinghope1970 It was destroyed by a TIE Fighter.
MacDragard 1 year ago 3
@leavinghope1970 Sorry, but this rocket only reached 17,000 feet before it exploded. You should check for at least the obvious contradictions when you make up conspiratorial UFO nonsense like this.
ApolloWasReal 1 month ago
I hate these dramatizations. They use unrealistic 'Hollywood' sound that arrives instantaneously, despite having originated several miles away. Reality shouldn't need a Foley artist.
They play the same ten seconds of footage over and over to stretch a short story into a long one. And then there are the factual errors...
lithiumdeuteride 2 years ago 35
@lithiumdeuteride I agree with you, it´s so made for improve like star wars fake ship sounds!!!Fgv-me for my bad english!!! ;=)
Travellerdream 2 years ago
@lithiumdeuteride i agree 100%. it gets really fucking annoying.
ControlTheSkies 1 year ago
@lithiumdeuteride Yes! I live near Cape Canaveral and I actually remember when this particular rocket exploded. I can tell you first hand that there was no big "Ka-Boom" sound. It was actually pretty quiet.
KWalsh554 1 year ago
@lithiumdeuteride
fuck... your right :O
predatortheme 11 months ago
Expensive fireworks display
BonesTheCat 2 years ago
"Air Force control" sent no command whatsoever. The Inadvertent Separation Destruct System onboard the rocket initiated a self destruct (as the name suggests) when the physical links between the solid rocket boosters and the core were severed due to aerodynamic forces ripping them apart.
It was a completeley automatic destruct, the range safety officer only got to watch the fireworks, not push the red button.
ugowar 2 years ago 25
I should add that exactly the same kind of destruct system also destroyed the first Ariane 5 rocket two years earlier which also suffered a guidance failure (but due to a software error), pitched down hard and air drag started ripping it apart.
ugowar 2 years ago
same thing
ap327145 2 years ago
Sometimes that's what they have to do to avoid loss of life. The rocket was unmanned I assume.
BeebeCh1972 2 years ago
Yes, it was. However, an Air Force report on the proposed Ares I manned launch vehicle claims that this Titan IV explosion may show that the Ares I's escape system isn't safe. The Titan explosion produced an enormous cloud of hot debris, and the report argues that if an Ares I blew up in this way, the escape system could not carry the manned capsule far enough to prevent the heat of the debris from melting the parachute material.
colindhowell 2 years ago
Incidentally, I found this video from an article in the Orlando Sentinel about that report (which also happens to be linked from Slashdot). Unfortunately, Youtube's comment restrictions prevent me from posting the URL's.
colindhowell 2 years ago