Added: 2 years ago
From: paulie21212121
Views: 434,779
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (1,037)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • alot of buildings will look like that but 9/11 is a cover up

  • its the way the satellite was angled

  • maybe the reason you can't see the towers is that the picture was taken later than 10am. Therefore the towers would no longer be standing

  • I'm all like OMG PAULIE your retarded!!

  • this seems a good inside photoshop job!

    scary

  • "the darkness". yes... the darkness.

  • When google Earth underwent a psycho analyse in my photoshop studio where it could use the program as a medium to communicate did it confess in one drawing of accomplicity to the deaths of 4000 people that day by affiliation. What I know of 911 is that it was a controled demolision job which plants a riddle why these people were at work.Until today do all my Windows version have a Verisign licence which would give me access to the files of all public departments March 2001 and April 2002

  • angle of the sattelite?

  • seriously kid, you are a failure at life. you really sound like a very low IQ idiot

  • you sound like a complete retard

  • Concerning the twin towers and all the "facts" the Fed has programmed us with, they are all False. There are 1000s of demolition experts on record as stating that it would be impossible for 2 jets to down those towers and that they were destroyed from controlled demolition. Or just stay asleep and enjoy whats left of your "American Dream" because its about to become the american nightmare. "There are none so blind as they who will not see"

  • @randywatchingbush hallo randy a lot of true words for me 1 masterkey to this 9/11 desaster is inside the famous family his brother installed month before with his company a lot (tons) of lets say safety stuff into this 3 buildings and this under top secret most of the people inside this buildings dont know what kind of safety stuff this company installed- okay randy here is a masterkey inside

  • The earth is round and they had to get the shot from where ever the satellite happened to be at that time or it is from a different orbiter than the usual ones they use.

  • So 5 minutes of "I don't know why it's like this." Good job buddy. Don't quit your day job.

  • @metaltildeath hey he's pointed out another hole in the governments story, so yeah, good job. wtf have u done lately?

  • I have seen google earth skew pictures before. My apartment was photographed for google like that once. That was years ago though. I am thinking it is probably that

  • THAT COULDN'T HAVE BEEN SEPT 12 AT PENTAGRAM. THE ROOF WASN'T COLLAPSED....GO LOOK. WHAT IS THIS?

  • COVER UP!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • These Google earth pictures of the planet are taken at different times throughout the day and at the "present" position (north, south, east or west of the object being photographed) of the satellite above the particular area being photographed at that particular time. The picture of the building in your video was taken by a satellite that was positioned to the south and your earlier pics of the towers were taken with the satellite position to the north of the building. Understand?

  • i am finally on the clever side of youtube, glad that bright humans still exist

  • I didnt know you could do that with Google Earth. thanks.

  • maybe google heard what was going on and tilted their satellite to get the pictures, that may be a cause??

  • @TheRobcabob You can pick the exact time of the satellites on Google earth, you can look at it from 1 hour before it happened to the minute after. I just tried on my my laptop but it's just to slow. If you enable the time bar and look the top right corner of it though you can choose the exact time of the satellite. If anyone wants to look into this further and see when the angle changed exactly that would be awesome.

  • It's what you get when you stitch pictures together taken at different angles, on different passes - even days. Did you expect every building in every satellite image to be the exact same angle?

  • There is an upload on my channel of an over two hour video of the wtc attacks, that was not released for nearly a decade. It is the most complete account in real time that has ever surfaced. If you give yourself over to merely listening to it, in its entirety.. you will have more of an understanding about that day; from another perspective, than you have gained from anything you have ever looked, and listened to about 9/11. Only the too proud, would disagree. Put asside the time to know?

  • What about the perfect BLAST CRATER that was in the image's after that day??? Looks like something Blew UP in the middle of the columns

  • The only evidence being produced here is that used by your father during his successful court petition to relinquish his parental rights.

    After screening this video, the family court judge, in complete sympathy with your father, unquestioningly granted his petition to relinquish any further parental responsibility for you.

    Right after the proceeding, your father made an appointment for a vasectomy, lest he make the same mistake twice.

    The family court judge phoned with congratulations.

  • But GoogleEarth wasn't available in 2001.

    It wasn't even available in 2003.

    Am I missing something?

  • @DontPublicMe I don't get your comment. This video about 'google earth' isn't very compelling. The comments that I made had no reference to the guy's video on google earth. Honestly I don't think his google earth vid. is very good, there are other more compelling videos out there about the subject. Search for: whistle blower Sue Lindauer, she worked for the CIA and was imprisoned for doing nothing wrong. She is now blowing the whistle on the cover up.

  • @redcapedjoker

    OK, I'll explain. (But not in a tone that suggests you're stupid; I want to clarify and understand.)

    A. This video seems to speak about GoogleEarth's pictures of the 9/11 event.

    B. HOWEVER, GoogleEarth (I understand) didn't start until 2005 (or, at least, wasn't in operation in 2001).

    C. So how could this be GoogleEarth's photography of the 9/11 events?

    But of course, as you say, your comments made no reference to this guy's video

    OK. And I'll go look up Sue Lindauer now

  • @DontPublicMe I realize that this dude's video is dumb. If you read my comments they never had google earth as a proof of the conspiracy. There are plenty of real proofs out there.

  • @redcapedjoker

    Yes, point taken, thanks.

    In fact, you deserve ten points!!

    You'll soon have people talking about how Hitler used a smart-phone to email his commanders out there on the front line.

  • 911 is the sloppiest coverup of an inside job in modern history. So many things do not make sense about it. Where is the remains of the plane at the pentagon? Why did many of the pentagon workers in that wing of the building never saw any plane? Why did the twin towers fell straight down at free fall speed? Why did nobody investigate twin tower owner Larry Silverstein who got 6 billion from the towers destruction? And what caused Building 7 to collapse when no plane struck it? This is all B.S.

  • @redcapedjoker

    But GoogleEarth wasn't available in 2001.

    It wasn't even available in 2003.

    Am I missing something?

  • 19 hijackers with box cutters....just accept it people...!

  • @spm1021 LOL

  • The problem is people don't want to know the truth... People enjoy creating there own reality in which they are comfortably away from harm and misleading people, REGUARDLESS IF 9/11 WAS SETUP OR NOT... WE STILL JUST SIT HERE... WE ALLOW THEM TO TREAT US THIS WAY... OUR SPIRIT HAS BROKEN AND SEEMS TO BE ALLOWED... IT'S GOTTA CHANGE I HATE THIS SLAVE DRIVING WORLD, WHERE DISEASE AND FILTH ARE CREATED BY MAN NOT GOD.... CLOUDS ARE FAKE AND SO IS THIS SHIT THEY CALL FOOD... LIFE IS MENT TO BE BETTER

  • It goes from black and white to color dude, it's obviously a new camera....

  • Comment removed

  • Hey man message my asap how did u get the option to go through the different yrs???

  • You make a very good point!! thanks

  • go buy a gun and do what exactly?

  • @some1dyanon

    nothing. just bury your head in the sand.

  • the government killed thousands of americans so we post a youtube vid LMAO go buy a gun

  • i figure the google imaging satellite wasnt directly over the towers, and was turned at the last minute to get a snapshot

  • I detect a virgin.

  • moron. Figure out what your talking about before you actually start recording.

  • It was because on that day they were using that satelite to take many different images and they are able to angle it at different times. so if you think about it there was 3 diff places of interest that they were probably toggling back and forth from so at that moment it might have been moving back from another position.

  • That was a CHEMTRAIL Covering Up the WTC from our view!

  • find taipei 101 on google earth, it lookes like its hanging over the street. it all depends on where the satellite is. geosynchronous isnt perfect, pictures will be different sometime. just happened to be on that day

  • Great observation.

  • Register that fuking hypercam already

  • I think it won't get clarified until about 2050 what really happened. I haven't seen anyone yet on Youtube with an all covering theory on how 9 11 was done.

  • This video makes no sense. What the hell are you trying to prove?

  • how do i use the timeline thingmagig??? LOL

  • The time frame of the actual event did not permit to have an ideal line of sight for satellite photos to be taken directly overhead. it make take seveval hours or days to redirect a satellite for an direct overhead pass on a speciic location...

  • Most google earth images are taken by aircraft not satellites. And this is done by private industry, not the government. The aircraft are at times in different places, thus different angles, though the same would be true for satellites. You can see this kind of anomaly in views af almost any city.

  • How would Google Earth know what the world looks like in 1940?

  • @SweetLunaLove Satalite images.

  • why is the angle so different on that day 9-11-01 then every other day and year ???? there is to many things that have happened to be just a coincidence. All you people who think the government is your friend and they are looking out for your best interest should really spend more time investigating all of this stuff , make sure you look at the whole scene too not just 9-11-01 but start back at JFK being killed and work your way up to present time.i dont want to beleive in conspiracy but.......

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • i am totally convinced this was an inside job....i mean really why would the angle be fliped like that. he brings up a realluy good point.

  • They don't take the pic from the same angle everytime!!! The satelites used vary in their position year to year when taking the photos from orbit!!!

  • It was an inside job.

  • They probably weren't planning on taking pictures of New York that day and had to quickly reposition a satellite that was in a different orbit to take a picture from a different angle.

  • My first guess is that the original camera positionn was not in place before 9/11, and that panic about air traffic extended to satellite positions.

  • It makes perfect sense to skew the satellite photo of such of an event. Especially if there is government involvement. I don't know what is so hard to believe about that. Its common knowledge that the government lies on everything, its common knowledge that the government has done some really dark shit in the past, why should 9/11 be such a stretch? Oh that's right, it gives people a perfect excuse and outlet to be racists, just use the terrorist card to get away with it!

  • @TheFinalParadigm I agree with you 100% people are so stupid or dont want to beleive that our government is shady . to many things are going on to not have some kind of doubt or conspiracy thoughts in one's mind. If anyone looks closely at all the videos and reads the literature available to us about 9-11-01 and still has no doubt that something is strange they gotta be the most narrow minded , dont think outside the box people in all creation. PEOPLE LIKE THAT ARE DENSE AND DUMB!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • @respecttimmy You are also 100% correct, the reason why people seem to want to look the other way and ignore the FACTS is because they have been raised their whole lives with lies, and those lies feel really good and comfortable, which is something that most people in America have been spoiled with. This country has been too comfortable and lazy for too long, and the last thing the average person wants to do is THINK AND ACT, and get outside their personal comfort zone.

  • @TheFinalParadigm I AGREE WITH YOU TOTALLY FRIEND. PEOPLE ACT LIKE THIS IS TOTALLY IMPOSSIBLE !!!!! I MEAN COME THE HELL ON !!!!!

  • @TheFinalParadigm Yup there brai washed which is what the government wants well said.

  • @respecttimmy like H.L. Mencken once said; "the common man is a fool"

  • @TheFinalParadigm I agree completely. Well said.

  • @NoodleNuggetz Thank you. I also checked out your channel... it's good stuff. Subscribed

  • @TheFinalParadigm you can also use the conspiracy card to be racist. the reason i don't believe in it is simply because it is just impossible to execute such operation, involve hundreds of people in the plot, keep it a secret and leave no evidence (i'm talking about real hard direct evidence, not the youtube style "evidence").

  • @bellijklh How about seismograph reports showing many explosions long before the towers fell? How about 911 dispatch tapes with firefighters inside claiming the same thing? How about scientific analysis showing traces of thermite? How about government documents made long before hand talking about "needing" this event to happen. They did get caught, they just count on people like you to believe what they tell you on the news.

  • @TheFinalParadigm the planes crashing into the towers and the people and debris that fell were energetic enough to be recorded on a seismograph. i heard about this scientific analysis showing traces of thermite, i asked a few conspiracists to provide me with a link to a university website where that research was published but no one could tell me where to find it. those documents you're talking about, where can i see them?

  • @bellijklh It is easier to involve a group of government people in a plot and then play the denial game than it is for a handful of people in living in cave planning around NORAD, CIA, FBI, NSA and other agencies....and that is just with America. They were also monitored by ISI, FSB, Mossad, MI-6, G-9, and others. You think they can thwart all of them too? A single man that can outwit the entire world's intelligence defenses? Give me a break. The "official" story is more ridiculous sounding!

  • @bellijklh And how exactly would you use a "conspiracy" card to be racist? The definition of the word "conspiracy" is: "When two or more people plan a crime in secret". Even the police use the word CONSPIRACY.... as in "you're under arrest for the CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT MURDER". But when it's used by the public towards corrupt power structure, it's turned around on the people to make them look like a bunch of crazies. Conspiracy is a crime committed, it cant be used in a racial way.

  • @TheFinalParadigm some people, usually muslims, use conspiracy to blame jews for 9/11, others blame muslims, so racism works both ways. i believe it was done by muslims and that's not racism, that's just the truth.

  • @bellijklh I agree with you. Interesting fact that you may want to look up... the muslims they did use, were not true muslims, and they were heavily connected to the CIA and other agencies, and several were trained on US military bases. Thats not youtube crap, that was reported by national news.

  • @TheFinalParadigm Its not even close to a stretch bro, the FBI tried it in 1998 as well, and it was a known inside job attack, look that shit up, knowing that attck makes this much easier to understand, they just got more creative this time

  • @TheFinalParadigm True! just compare Micheal jackson to WTC AND Mj's Doctor to Osama!!! The doct and Osama were distractions!!! why people make it so hard?

  • whos jack?

  • idk what your saying. mostly because my speakers dont work. . . .and i dont have speakers . . . . : (

  • the very fact that we are suspicious is proof that we the people are not running things and that my friends is the real problem!

  • thats a trip man, just more proof of the cover up

  • Good Observation bro.. and dont mind when people tell you you're brainwashed, you're not crazy if there are millions that think like you

  • These images are a response to the twin towers attack taken, at the time, with the Ikonos Satelite. This was not the normal imaging, and was used for other purposes.

    Ikonos was unique in that it could rotate its lenses. They interrupted its normal operations on 9/11, to capture these images. These image were available to academic institutions within hours as part of their normal licensing. I saw these with my own eyes just after 9/11 from the ikonos server.

  • that building is present with the angled roof at ~3:06 and the bottom of the screen at ~3:19. so its no cover up, just a bad angle.

  • @kelvinewilliams : I was going to say the same thing ^^

    Dude it's just because the guy in google said "You band of idiot, you didn't take a picture of that, do it now before the satellite is too far

  • The angle is odd because it was not the normal satellite. Typically when a major event occurs, they'll utilize the first satellite flying over for imagery.  Look at major tornadoes, etc, its pretty common.

  • i would assume the angle from which the picture was taken has to do with where the satellite was when the picture was taken, all the other buildings including the one you pointed out are AT THE SAME ANGLE.

  • are you fucking retarded? if the government covered this up they wouldn't do a shitty job that a 14 yeAR OLD WOULD NOTICE. it would be inconceivable

  • Hey, ummm, I just downloaded Google earth and this square won't load. Everything around it does. I can zoom in down to the street. But, not in this square. Interesting isn't it. Try it yourself. Is it my computer? Or is there something to hide? I'm curious.

  • @des100601 Turns out it was just my computer BUT go and look at it yourself. What he is referencing in the video is interesting. The building isn't altered, THE PIC IS UPSIDE DOWN! You can go to dates before and after and spin the pic 360 degrees get 360 degree views. But, on 9/2001 it just turns the same pic round and round. Go see for yourself! Why?!?!?!

  • If I was running satalite photography, and something THAT big happened,I'd do everything I could to get a photo of it,even if it meant using a bird that wasn't in the prefered position. Just saying.

  • they just turned it slightly toward the street view giving it an off angle and a side profile like ... sad that alot of people died and the story is not clear on so many levels..

  • Im convinced now, this video did it for me. Obviously they skewed the angle to cover the secret meeting that was going inside that building. I bet if you could flip angles you would see Dick Cheaney, Donald Rumsfeld, Vin Diesel, Willie Nelson and Shaquille O'Neil planning a suprise birthday party for Charles Manson. Luckily they knew Manson had access to Google Earth otherwise forget about the suprise all together

  • fair point you raise and i agree its sus as

  • the reason for the angle being horrible is simple, 9/11 was an inside job and it had to be hidden on even a program such as google earth, its ironic how no other building looked so weird besides the world trade center

  • Is this video narrated by Benson?

  • @RamTerritory what, Benson from the regular show?

  • @godkingRoss Yessir.

  • Guys, I'm glad he cleared up the fact that there was a cloud at 1:00. Scared me for a second.

  • Go back to the 10th

  • The angle is different because the satellite they used to take the photo was not overhead, but they took the photo when they had the chance. The trajectory probably didn't not take the satellite over NYC any closer than it already was.

  • Comment removed

  • You are a simpleton.

  • or... it's the nearest sat. google had to ground zero after wtc fell and it was only able to get a fucked up image

  • its almost as if they are covering it up!?

  • when the building has the 'strange angle', the other buildings in the vicinity do as well. these google images are a montage of several images, and from time to time the composition will change, depending on cloud cover or time of day and satellite position.

    try this with other cities in the world, over a span of several years, and you'll see similar discrepancies.

    now, if this kid had shown the world trade centres on sept 12, 2001, that would have been pretty cool. otherwise, no big thing.

  • ya different lenses and what not also. Maybe different satellites with different lenses. i donut know dontcha know

  • So what is your point?

  • The picture was taken after they fell. Durring the event, they had NASA readjust that particular satellite to cover up the wreckage. So yes. It was a cover up. But all they covered up was a horrific sight. You're mad about that?

  • at least he is looking more than what the gov want to do... well done paulie

  • they use thousands of satellites some are at different orbits giving you different angles...

  • Also you mentioned "you can't see the towers, theres no chance"

    Well the towers did collapse so that is why you didn't see them you retard.

  • The satellites are never in the same angle it was just a coincidence that it was at such an odd angle

  • lol 1940 :P uh uh, kids...

  • the satellite is always in a different position. the end

  • I LIKE THE 1940 PHOTO THE BEST WHEN THERE WAS NO SATELLITES IN SPACE TO TAKE PHOTOS -  L M A O Ô¿Ô

  • If you look closely, you can see how all the angles for the all the buildings changed on the different dates. Now stop it, you freakin conspirisy theorists.

  • 9/11 was set up. Why did the towers fall straight down? If a plain going at 800 miles per hour (idk) slams into a building that tall from that direction, it should have fallen sideways instead.?? Theres tons of ideas of conspiracies. check them out.

  • just like to say your a fucking retard. Hmmm maybe the reason the angle is off is because the satellite does not orbit the earth at the same speed it rotates. So the satellite is over a different area photographing and when google found out about the plane crashes they angles the satellite to look at NYC. So that is why you have an odd angle. Remember the satellite is pretty fucking high up there.

  • @perkins1192 Though I'm sure 9/11 was a government action, I have to agree with you on your angle theory, it is sound.

  • well that angle is almost definantly the result of a change in the position of the satellite taking the picture...

  • Of course it was just a reason to invade iraq

  • Great observation! Not sure at all why the angle is different, but the clouds of smoke is the debris from the towers which already fell by the time this still shot was taken! Hope this helps with clarity!

  • also if you zoom into street view you go -17m under ground

  • Do u realize that sattelites shoot photo strait down?! that the side angles u see r not exactly the way it is, it's graphically modified so u can have an idea of the object

  • Or nvm. :L

  • Are you that stupid? Obviously the satellite was too far to capture and above view.

  • What's the cover up?

  • ifyou tiltyour head a little bit you see the towers already collapsd if im right sorry for my english

  • The took a quick satelite photo at the angle the satelite was at. Nothing mysterious there.

  • the sattileite that took that image was in a different angle at that time so it looks weird

  • talk louder

  • Only thing I can think of is that they wanted to make sure that the circles left behind by their weapons of mass destruction were kept hidden - check out the work of Dr Judy Wood

  • I'm pretty sure Google carefully selects photos taken from consistent angles so that the satellite images look pretty. Images are selected based on cloud cover, position of the satellite and time of day (to minimize shadows). However, the satellites are always taking images, even if they will never be used. If you notice all the buildings in manhattan are facing the same direction in the 9/11 picture.

    Google likely included the images from 9/11 because they knew people would go back to look.

  • why is everyone being a jerk, i think he brings up a really valid observation

  • @AllmyXsNtx Valid observation?? The dude cant even figure out how to properly use google earth nor does he understand time. He is using GE to try and look for the towers on Sept 11 2001 and it never occurred to him that maybe what he is seeing on the 11th is an after picture and thats why he cant find the towers. Then he is trying to compare satellite images to compare the difference between 2012 and the mid 1940s?!?! Maybe someone should tell him there weren't any satellites back then!!

  • @Baronstone ur gay

  • thanks for pointing out the cloud, i thought it was the empire state

  • OMG PAULIE YOUR RETARDED

  • okay i belive in the first part of your video tower one or two idk but had already fallen adn they building you were comparing angles to seemed to be on fire but good work man keep it up

  • I use this video to fall asleep

  • SERIOUSLY, this kid is a good example why there is so many fuckin problems in this fucking world.

  • @tayoprick why, because he's asking questions and looking for the truth?? stay in ya box and dont interrupt those who are willing to seek.

  • it is because several photos of the same building were taken and have some overlay. my old house in key west looks twice its size. but it is a issue with multiple shots being used to form one image.

  • yawwwwwwwwwwwn

  • the towers already fell that stuff was debris......

  • You can not see the towers because they had already fallen down. That Angel is odd though

  • idiot its because there is more than one satellite and there is a thing called orbit

  • The images on google earth of the WTC were taken by a NASA Satellite purposely to survey the damage...just because the angle is off kilter with much less sophisticated technology than we have today doesnt mean the government covered up anything..

  • your a fucktard