William Craig vs. Paul Draper- Existence of God Part 2

[Requiemxtoxinnocence]

A god may be possible, but I sincerely doubt it's the biblical god as the earth is not the same age as the universe, that and we know that gods do not create stars. We don't know enough about our universe and we only know what happened a few milliseconds afterword, nor do we know for sure what type of universe we have. To assert it was god is a massive leap of faith when the force is unknown.

[braino2000]

I don't get it, these youtube atheists (knowntje) are making videos supposedly "refuting" the cosmological argument, but all of their arguments are not only made up, but invalid. They say "the universe is all there is, and does not have a cause" but top atheists physicists like Stephen Weinberg say that "The only way out of the cosmological dillema is a multiverse" so can an atheist please tell me which one? Multiverse or singular cosmos?

[bighaus54]

Multiverse is possible but just like God cannot be proven or disproven.

[Lanter1000]

I see it this way. We really can´t know what happened before the Big Bang. We can´t know anything about the conditions back then. That´s why I don´t like the Craigs cosmological argument.

[MercifulMing]

Objective morality exists, but only within the context of our species, and only within the context of our time in history.

Any enlightened person in a free nation can look at the law given to the Hebrews by God and see the terrible affronts to true morality it contains.

The arc of history is long, but it bends toward justice.

[3dot141]

"The arc of history is long, but it bends toward justice."

Hmm...

Don't you think that the Hebrews would think the same?