ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology
GOD, HEAVEN, AND SEX: Internet article examines the Biblical possibility of sex in heaven. Human sexuality isn't just for reproduction. There are reasons the Bible requires marriage for sex on earth, but those reasons won't exist in heaven. Scripture teaches, in heaven, we'll be like the angels only in one sense - no marriage, but we won't be like angels in every other way (i.e. Bible says we'll enjoy food and drink). Psalm 16:11 says there will be great spiritual joy and pleasures in heaven.
SCIENCE SHOWS THAT THE UNIVERSE could not have sustained itself eternally because of entropy. Einstein confirmed that space, matter, and time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How were species living, reproducing if their reproductive system, vital structures, and organs hadn't evolved yet? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic/biological similarities between species.
DO EYES CARRY SCARS OF EVOLUTION? Read this fantastic Internet article by biologist and creationist Brian Thomas. Thomas refutes every argument for a "flawed" design for the eye, and explains how and why the so-called flaw is actually the best thing for the eye. Read the article! It's amazing what facts evolutionists will ignore. Numerous times evolutionists have been proven wrong about their interpretation of a structure as being flawed in design or useless
BLIND WATCHMAKER NO ARGUMENT. Natural selection is no "blind watchmaker" because it can only "select" from traits having survival value. It doesn't produce those traits. It only operates once there is life and reproduction, not before, so it couldn't be involved in life's origins. A partially-evolved cell (an oxymoron) would quickly disintegrate. It couldn't wait ("survive") millions of years for chance to complete it and then make it living! Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
ALL REAL EVOLUTION ( i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.) is the expression, over time, of already existing genes. Evolution is possible only if there’s information (genes) directing it. Only variations of already existing genes are possible, which means only limited evolution and adaptations are possible. Nature has no ability to invent new genes via random mutations caused by random environmental forces. That’s evolutionary faith, not science. Read my article, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
GENETIC INFORMATION DOESN'T HAPPEN BY CHANCE, so it's more logical to believe that genetic similarities between all forms of life are due to a common Designer who designed similar functions for similar purposes. It doesn't mean all forms of life are biologically related! "Junk DNA" isn't junk. These non-coding segments of DNA have recently been found to be vital in regulating gene expression. Read: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
DAWKINS, HITCHENS, AND HAWKING REFUSE TO DEBATE with creationists who are SCIENTISTS, such as the scientists at The Institute for Creation Research. Dawkins and his friends only debate non-scientist creationists. Read my popular Internet articles: ARE FOSSILS REALLY MILLIONS OF YEARS OLD? HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM, ANY LIFE ON MARS CAME FROM EARTH, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE!
NOT ALL EVOLUTIONISTS even agree on the fossils used to support and reconstruct human evolution. The bones are incomplete. There's no certainty of the bones belonging to the same creature. They can reconstruct whatever they want from these bones, and they have. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from an ape-like creature anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from a four-legged dog-like creature. Read my article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE
ARE FOSSILS REALLY MILLIONS OF YEARS OLD? Popular Internet article that examines assumptions concerning fossil deposition as well as built-in assumptions involved in modern radiometric dating (not used for dating fossils but other rocks), and arguments from starlight and time. Discusses lack of true transitional forms and lack of sequence of the fossil layers. Discusses mixed species in fossils (i.e. dinosaur, reptile, mammal fossils in the same stratum conveniently ignored by evolutionists).
IMAGINE A FISH WITH PART FINS, part feet with the fins evolving (transitioning) into feet. What survival benefit would there be? The fish couldn't use its fins or its feet, and there are no fossils showing such a creature ever existed. They only exist on automobile bumper stickers! There are no true transitional forms, either living or fossilized. Evolutionists realize this fact! Read my Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
APES ARE QUITE COMFORTABLE IN HOW THEY WALK, just as humans are quite comfortable in how they walk. Even a slight change in the position of a muscle or bone, for either, would be excruciatingly painful and would not be an advantage for survival. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from ape-like creature anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from four-legged dog-like creatures. Read Internet article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE.
SOME kind of bullshit IS going on here. Every time that women discusses irrefutable evidence of evolution or gives evidence or video of some dumbshit politician breaking the 1st Amendment the noise level just goes through the fucking ROOF! Every. Single. Time. I've watched the whole video 3 times now. Now these fucks are intentionally ruining video as it's being recorded in order to prevent the debunking of their stupidity? It's incredibly annoying, and desperate, on their part. STFU!!!
I, for one, thank you for posting this. So It's not absolutely perfect. It get's the majority of the meeting across and does a good job of giving people that weren't there a chance to hear this lecture. If you don't like it, simply don't watch.
Reigion has only faith to place in science, not an ability to improve it. It can utilize science's innovation's but in no way innovate on it's own. 4000+ years of belief has not created one iota of new understanding.
Religion has only faith to place in science, not an ability to improve it. It can utilize science's innovation's but in no way innovate on it's own. 4000+ years of belief has not created one iota of new understanding.
Religion has only faith to place in science, not an ability to improve it. It can utilize science's innovation's but in no way innovate on it's own. 4000+ years of belief has not created one iota of new understanding.
@thatpatinboy01 Sounds like one of the reasons I left Alabama. If religious people were one billionth as skeptical towards their religious beliefs as they are to proven science, they would have abandoned the silly parts of their religious beliefs long ago, BUT the problem is that religions train their followers to not apply the logic, reason, and evidence that they would in everyday tests of truth to religious beliefs. It's even more vicious and deadly when religions want to control government.
This is what i don't understand, People who feel they need to resign like in the dover case's school board because they lost a vote. way to vacate your seat of intelligence for some douche to take over
@village1diot Why did y'all send Little Dubya down here to live? He could've grown up in New England and been a good little boy. We didn't give him that college degree.
This has been flagged as spam show
ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology
Mogley52 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
GOD, HEAVEN, AND SEX: Internet article examines the Biblical possibility of sex in heaven. Human sexuality isn't just for reproduction. There are reasons the Bible requires marriage for sex on earth, but those reasons won't exist in heaven. Scripture teaches, in heaven, we'll be like the angels only in one sense - no marriage, but we won't be like angels in every other way (i.e. Bible says we'll enjoy food and drink). Psalm 16:11 says there will be great spiritual joy and pleasures in heaven.
Mogley52 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SCIENCE SHOWS THAT THE UNIVERSE could not have sustained itself eternally because of entropy. Einstein confirmed that space, matter, and time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)
Mogley52 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How were species living, reproducing if their reproductive system, vital structures, and organs hadn't evolved yet? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic/biological similarities between species.
Mogley52 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DO EYES CARRY SCARS OF EVOLUTION? Read this fantastic Internet article by biologist and creationist Brian Thomas. Thomas refutes every argument for a "flawed" design for the eye, and explains how and why the so-called flaw is actually the best thing for the eye. Read the article! It's amazing what facts evolutionists will ignore. Numerous times evolutionists have been proven wrong about their interpretation of a structure as being flawed in design or useless
Mogley52 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
BLIND WATCHMAKER NO ARGUMENT. Natural selection is no "blind watchmaker" because it can only "select" from traits having survival value. It doesn't produce those traits. It only operates once there is life and reproduction, not before, so it couldn't be involved in life's origins. A partially-evolved cell (an oxymoron) would quickly disintegrate. It couldn't wait ("survive") millions of years for chance to complete it and then make it living! Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ALL REAL EVOLUTION ( i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.) is the expression, over time, of already existing genes. Evolution is possible only if there’s information (genes) directing it. Only variations of already existing genes are possible, which means only limited evolution and adaptations are possible. Nature has no ability to invent new genes via random mutations caused by random environmental forces. That’s evolutionary faith, not science. Read my article, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
GENETIC INFORMATION DOESN'T HAPPEN BY CHANCE, so it's more logical to believe that genetic similarities between all forms of life are due to a common Designer who designed similar functions for similar purposes. It doesn't mean all forms of life are biologically related! "Junk DNA" isn't junk. These non-coding segments of DNA have recently been found to be vital in regulating gene expression. Read: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DAWKINS, HITCHENS, AND HAWKING REFUSE TO DEBATE with creationists who are SCIENTISTS, such as the scientists at The Institute for Creation Research. Dawkins and his friends only debate non-scientist creationists. Read my popular Internet articles: ARE FOSSILS REALLY MILLIONS OF YEARS OLD? HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM, ANY LIFE ON MARS CAME FROM EARTH, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE!
Mogley52 6 months ago
NOT ALL EVOLUTIONISTS even agree on the fossils used to support and reconstruct human evolution. The bones are incomplete. There's no certainty of the bones belonging to the same creature. They can reconstruct whatever they want from these bones, and they have. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from an ape-like creature anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from a four-legged dog-like creature. Read my article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE
Mogley52 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ARE FOSSILS REALLY MILLIONS OF YEARS OLD? Popular Internet article that examines assumptions concerning fossil deposition as well as built-in assumptions involved in modern radiometric dating (not used for dating fossils but other rocks), and arguments from starlight and time. Discusses lack of true transitional forms and lack of sequence of the fossil layers. Discusses mixed species in fossils (i.e. dinosaur, reptile, mammal fossils in the same stratum conveniently ignored by evolutionists).
Mogley52 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
IMAGINE A FISH WITH PART FINS, part feet with the fins evolving (transitioning) into feet. What survival benefit would there be? The fish couldn't use its fins or its feet, and there are no fossils showing such a creature ever existed. They only exist on automobile bumper stickers! There are no true transitional forms, either living or fossilized. Evolutionists realize this fact! Read my Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
APES ARE QUITE COMFORTABLE IN HOW THEY WALK, just as humans are quite comfortable in how they walk. Even a slight change in the position of a muscle or bone, for either, would be excruciatingly painful and would not be an advantage for survival. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from ape-like creature anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from four-legged dog-like creatures. Read Internet article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE.
Mogley52 6 months ago
SOME kind of bullshit IS going on here. Every time that women discusses irrefutable evidence of evolution or gives evidence or video of some dumbshit politician breaking the 1st Amendment the noise level just goes through the fucking ROOF! Every. Single. Time. I've watched the whole video 3 times now. Now these fucks are intentionally ruining video as it's being recorded in order to prevent the debunking of their stupidity? It's incredibly annoying, and desperate, on their part. STFU!!!
LordSlag 8 months ago
@thatpatinboy01 You're probably close enough to smell the BS coming from Texas, too. You're gonna want to head north.
tctheunbeliever 1 year ago
@tctheunbeliever We can't give em the south, instead of letting them spread like a virus, they need to be stamped out.
TheScienceFoundation 1 year ago
I, for one, thank you for posting this. So It's not absolutely perfect. It get's the majority of the meeting across and does a good job of giving people that weren't there a chance to hear this lecture. If you don't like it, simply don't watch.
1010011010is29a 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Reigion has only faith to place in science, not an ability to improve it. It can utilize science's innovation's but in no way innovate on it's own. 4000+ years of belief has not created one iota of new understanding.
IntuitiveLeap 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Religion has only faith to place in science, not an ability to improve it. It can utilize science's innovation's but in no way innovate on it's own. 4000+ years of belief has not created one iota of new understanding.
IntuitiveLeap 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Religion has only faith to place in science, not an ability to improve it. It can utilize science's innovation's but in no way innovate on it's own. 4000+ years of belief has not created one iota of new understanding.
IntuitiveLeap 1 year ago
Comment removed
IntuitiveLeap 1 year ago
@thatpatinboy01 Sounds like one of the reasons I left Alabama. If religious people were one billionth as skeptical towards their religious beliefs as they are to proven science, they would have abandoned the silly parts of their religious beliefs long ago, BUT the problem is that religions train their followers to not apply the logic, reason, and evidence that they would in everyday tests of truth to religious beliefs. It's even more vicious and deadly when religions want to control government.
EcrossH 1 year ago 2
wow, horrible quality.
tnordloh 1 year ago
@thatpatinboy01 Harder to fix that from farther away. If it can be fixed....
pileofsalt 1 year ago
@thatpatinboy01
This is what i don't understand, People who feel they need to resign like in the dover case's school board because they lost a vote. way to vacate your seat of intelligence for some douche to take over
akirosette 1 year ago
Why bother recording at all when there are this many errors.
Koshy2 1 year ago
@Koshy2 Santa Syndrome must be a bitch eh TROLL.
meanmopar426 1 year ago
Great, more ignorant right wing morons in the south.
village1diot 1 year ago 2
@village1diot Why did y'all send Little Dubya down here to live? He could've grown up in New England and been a good little boy. We didn't give him that college degree.
tctheunbeliever 1 year ago
At one point do they use the microphone as a hammer and it sounds like those people need to be cured of Tuberculosis.
cmsalvagio 1 year ago 2
Could the audience please stop beating the microphones with their chairs, and stop coughing in their megaphones, please? Thank you.
Vidar33 1 year ago 13
@Vidar33 I see this in a lot of these videos, I'm starting to think that the creationists are putting people into the audience to do this stuff :D
I know it's sarcasm, but It wouldn't suprise me at all...
Either that or there's a plague in the room.
ReddmanDGZ 1 year ago
At around 40 minutes in, the piano moving class joins for their elective.
MrStillmans 1 year ago 3
Luggada earl ermma skremp!
filorps 1 year ago
their shit doesnt work because all the smart people who knew how to run things left, FOR UTAH!
Way to give Louisiana the 'Intolerance of Reality" award. previously owned by Utah!
ZedCarmine 1 year ago
shuffle shuffle shuffle CRASH CRASH *cough cough cough*
myrmecophilous 1 year ago 10
@myrmecophilous I think it´s a contest.
mnbvfghjuytr 1 year ago
Good talk, but an infuriating recording.
myrmecophilous 1 year ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
FIIRST!!!!!!ASDASDJAJKMNSDFM AWDa
BaneOfFreeSpeech 1 year ago