Is it any coincidence that this video has had so many comments recently. I know why. Because we on on the eve of a nuclear ww3 starting with the long planned attack on Iran and Syria to drag Russia and China into a world war. People are waking up, thats why so many comments recently on this video
@wakeup2nwo If the 'West' attacked Syria or Iran no nuclear war is likely to start at all. That is very unlikely. Neither China nor Russia have any desire to see that.
humans are very intelligent the fact we could produce a wepon of such horror is thhe evidence however a few of our inventions come back to haunt us :(
I can understand why people of restricted intelligence would need to reduce a premise to its lowest common denominator, however there is a lot more to the reasons behind the cold war than the existance of nuclear weapons. for example, having a communist regime led by a complete nut job (stalin) sat right in the heart of Europe with his heart set on complete domination of the west. can be explained thus:
He wants to invade us. we don't want him to. got it?
@mrspivvy Stalin wasn't even a factor in the cold war. When you consider it started in 1953, the same year in which he died. The US was (and still is) afraid of communism, especially due to its spread to other asian countries such as China. It was effectively a race to prolong or promote capitalism versus communism. Nuclear weapons were a big part of that. But they weren't a contributing factor, they were a weapon.
THEY KEEP THIS STUFF FROM THE TAX PAYER, ITS PAID FOR BY THE TAX PAYER,WILL PROBABLY END UP BEING USED ON THE TAX PAYER,AND ITS SUPPOSED TO BE A FREE COUNTRY LOL OPEN YOUR EYES YOU DONT HAVE A CHOICE BUT YOUR PAYING FOR IT
@kdum8 wrong!! you're is short for 'you are' example:"you're annoying" he said "open your eyes" which means what it says...open your eyes. NOT OPEN YOU ARE EYES!! you mong!
@kezza8880 Actually no, re-read again what you wrote. "BUT YOUR PAYING FOR IT" is what you said. This is wrong, it should be You're as in 'You are paying for it'. Contrition and humble pie and we can call it quits... ;)
@cornishrob123 It might or it might not have been. Could have been a decoy. Why be predictable and only go at night. For this route it might be safer during the day. What would you know? Or I know for that matter? I would say there is a legitimate chance that this convoy is the real deal.
@cornishrob123 And thats why it was done in the day light, also it doesn't matter what time, day or night if they need moving they need moving, still get the same protection
Are you a moron? Nuclear weapons need to be activated using authorization codes. They can only be detonated when the material reaches critical mass, fusing atoms together and releasing the huge amount of energy. you could drop it from space and unless the weapon had been armed it would not detonate.
@littlebigsociety Regardless that if the rocket was to be launched but the warhead not activated it is still a conduit of radiation so if to say if the shell was to be damaged on inpact it would leak radiation and people would still die by hundreds if not thousands and the area in question would be condemed.
Like Chernoby granted Chernobyl was a reactor not a rocket but at the end of the day radiation is radiation.
@littlebigsociety P.S I dont know what the other guy said I was just pointing out the fact that if the ICBM was launched but not armed it would still do a large amount of damage.
@thebritish25 what do you mean? wouldn't be much worse than a rock of similar size and weight. Albeit a rock with 30kgs of HE strapped to it (there is no gaurentee that the HE would detonate on impact). The fissile material (radioactive bits) are very stable they and wouldn't result in a nuclear chain reaction. The only real risk you would have would be a relatively minor HAZCHEM situation with the fissile material breaking up. Even then they aren't dangerously radioactive.
@littlebigsociety nothing to do with "england". It was created by the UK, of which Scotland is a part. We have had plenty of Scottish Prime Ministers and important MPs. Scotland is very fairly represented politically in the Union.
You're clearly filming the convoy leaving a base right? you travel along at high speed with the convoy.. still filming.. then you put a video up of the starting point, destination and date of the nuclear weapons transport clearly showing what sort of security is employed during the move...
umm sorry to say but the military are not stupid enough to just drive around in military vehicles fill of nuclear missiles, they transport them in secret trucks looking like tesco trucks or random ones, or some arse will just crash their car into this convoy and BOOM this is just a casual convoy.
@bertybobjnr Nuclear weapons dont just go boom driving a car into them, they have to be armed and detonated.. Im not a nuclear scientist or anything but they're specifically designed so that if a plane gets shot down carrying them and they're in burning jet fuel for hours.. They still wont go off. Think i heard that in a movie once so it must be true.
Why was the driver of this car weaving in and out of the convoy? Where they trying to provoke a response from the military/police tasked to guard those lorries?? Nuclear weapons should be respected and if you want to protest against them then fine do so, but weaving in and out of the convoy was preventing these vehicles from protecting the materials included inside the lorries and thus risking harm to the environment. These protesters are as much a danger than the USSR was during the cold war...
Nukes aren't necessarily a bad thing in the right hands. Take the USSR and the US for an example. They're smart enough not to use it because they'll just end up killing EVERYONE in the world. However, if somebody who doesn't have the same moral compass as them (eg. Iran, terrorists, etc) gets their hands on a nuke...you're screwed.
@TheRabbitFear support coach to take the lorry drivers and support crews to their rest stops once they reach their destination. it also takes them back to their starting point if they have to leave the lorries at their destination
@AntonyThorburn Humans are the intelligent species, simply because we're the only species with the mental capacity to make the claim of being the intelligent species...
God help us? No he won't help. But the flying spagetti monster might.
@jackhwo1 Acually the Cold War started in 1945 when the Allies and Soviets disagreed over how Europe should look after the war.
It hit its first crisis in 1948 when the soviet locked down East Germany in an attempted to starve the allies into submission and give up Berlin but the allies just flew over it the Berlin Airlift.
But both sides where planning to attack each other Stalin planned to "Liberate" Europe while the Allies where planning Unthinkable in late 45
@thebritish25 It's disputed amongst historians when the date for the beginning of the Cold war should be put, however nobody claims it began in 1945. Most agree it should be put in the early 50's, although the earliest I've seen it to be put is 1947. So, not 1945. And my point was that Stalin was largely uninvolved in the Cold war after his death in 1951. Considering the vast majority of the Cold war was after that.
But I see what you our saying that it did not start getting shall we say " Intresting" till the early 50s.
But the disagreements started in 1945 after the war when the Soviets refused to relent on the issue of an independent Poland the allies wanted it free as technicaly thats what the Brits went to war over but Poland was part of the Russian Empire so the soviets belived it belonged to them
@thebritish25 Why are you giving me a basic history lesson? I've shown a clear knowledge of history regarding WW2, I don't need a refresher course thanks. You aren't giving any form of a valid point. There was no need to reply.
@thebritish25 What about the WW2 detail matters? I've shown an understanding of modern history, I don't need a history lesson. As I already said you didn't make any form of a valid point. There was no reason for the history lesson.
You didn't make a point regarding the beginning of the cold war, we'd moved on from that, I'd already told you it was disputed with most historians agreeing it had started in the early 50's.
@thebritish25 Perhaps I should start to lecture you on the communist revolution in Russia so you understand what irrelevence is. I'm sure you know lots about it, and it has nothing to do with what we were discussing.
@AntonyThorburn humans are very intelligent the fact we could produce a wepon of such horror is thhe evidence however a few of our inventions come back to haunt us :(
Right, I understand the need for the breakdown vehicles, the masses of police, security forces in Army Land Rovers and unmarked transit minibusses, the mobile command unit (horse box looking thing) and the fire crews. But why was there an empty coach? Take it they were already empty by about 3:00 and people were passing them on the M'Way.
@joshy1066 Think about it though, if there weren't nuclear weapons there could have been another world war between the USSR and the west. The mutually assured destruction factor that the arms race created put the both sides off attacking each other.
@graemeoliver84 Nuclear Weapons might have saved The West and the USSR but in the end people just want to watch the world burn for it is, one way or another WW III will happen and I can sure you that 100% along with Nuclear weapons going off. It will not just involve Governments, we are just provoking the end longer and longer and the longer it gets the worse the end will be... Just take a look at the world today and you will realize that the Cold war was nothing.
@graemeoliver84 Are you some kind of idiot ? The only reason the cold war happened was BECAUSE of nuclear weapons, there were litterally NO other factors, THEY had big missiles so WE got bigger missiles, THEY saw WE had bigger missiles so THEY got more missiles etc etc etc, it ended when BOTH sides decided to agree to stop making them, nukes were THE ONLY FACTOR.
Do some research before babbling your retarded warmongering shit, hell why not look in to Israel and Iran today.
@SpankyRavenscroft There would still have been considerable tension between the two sides straight after WWII, yes the existance of nuclear weapons raised the stakes, but the Soviet Union had Stalin in charge for Christ's sake and the USSR still would have had their half of Europe which the Allies still wouldn't have been that keen on. Yes this is probably a complicated subject of debate, but why do you have be so rude and aggressive, honestly?
@joshy1066 yeah your right no one be pointing nukes but then we have a world war 3 if russia and america didn't have nukes they would have gone to war and it saved loads of men in american soldiers in japan.
I don't disagree with their use, but they couldn't have signposted it more - that circus procession basically screams "We're carrying something important!"
Nuclear weapons could still be used if, say, any of the current republican candidates gets into power in the States. But then, I was convinced Bush was going to nuke someone and he was fortunately restrained.
Or if, as I suspect, everyone votes against the big three parties here in the UK (and by all rights, there's no reason why anyone would vote for any of those douches) and we wind up with some lunatic party like the EDL, BNP, Islam4UK or some other ridiculous group.
Or maybe if Putin just gets pissed off, I wouldn't put it past him either. There are images of him hunting tigers with a knife in his teeth, if only our leaders had such balls.
i dont see the problem with them. every one has one to prevent them being used on us. so all they are is a big bully body guard you nuke me and ill nuke you
nuclear wepons convoy with the song you just can help thinking that nuclear wepons will end the human race the ultamate power reasorce used to help each other then adapted to kill each other.
@MrH1tler They wouldnt use SAS on this. The guard will be a mix of Marines and navy personnel. Ive been on similar convoys with the RAF and the guard was actually known as special safety team and was mostly RAF police and a mix of airmen from various squadrons on the base. Only qualification we needed to be on the convoy was to have our weapons qualifcations up to date and attend a lecture.
In this state of transport a tactical nuke is harmeless only if the components are together can it be used not forgetting top secret launch codes. So you should really be concerned about the likes of iran china russia etc
This video really does sicken me. I used to see these convoys 1st hand when they traveled through my home town (Helensburgh about 5 miles down the road from the base). All the security, mounted weaponry police armed with sub machine guns. Driving right outsides peoples homes, workplaces and schools.
If the worst was to happen it would be in a residential area with terrible collateral damage.
And the money spent on these is a £100m hole in the countries budget which we really cant afford.
@BluTrollPro The worst that could happen is a traffic collision... which wouldn't effect the cargo, which is carried in seperate pieces anyway. I don't agree with making more nuclear weapons though...
In these modern times i think with all these nuke's if there was a war they would kill the planet and can country's really afford nuclear wars these day !?!?!?! this earth is old now we need too let him rest !! :) ???.
@DARKJURNEY most nuclear armed states transport nuclear weapons by ground due to cold war treaty's ban air transport of nuclear weapons. infact people got bollocked in america for transporting six warhead by air.
@Elitepoosniff ,Would you care to actually explaining what you are trying to say or just run your mouth like a little kid , also dicks are the ones that fck the pussies how from what i have writen did you derive that????????????????????
they are! the terrorists thats why theres a bunch of fuckin rookies guarding the field in the middle of nowhere.... cause they know no ones settin those fuckers off. people just want to live... and they use this shit to convince you that crazy people want you dead... in reality they want your british ass out of their dieing communities with your fuckin nukes and your pathetic day jobs
Pukka!
davethemouse1 8 hours ago
Mad world? are you kidding?, it would be even madder if we never had a nuclear capability to defend ourselves.
PeterPrepper 1 day ago
Is it any coincidence that this video has had so many comments recently. I know why. Because we on on the eve of a nuclear ww3 starting with the long planned attack on Iran and Syria to drag Russia and China into a world war. People are waking up, thats why so many comments recently on this video
wakeup2nwo 1 day ago
@wakeup2nwo If the 'West' attacked Syria or Iran no nuclear war is likely to start at all. That is very unlikely. Neither China nor Russia have any desire to see that.
kdum8 1 day ago
The UK should deport all muslims and drop those weapons on the middle east...
janmadytay 3 days ago
this place has been closed for over ten years wtf
readingnewboy 3 days ago
@readingnewboy Which place?
kdum8 2 days ago
wow - when you think about it It's amazing how much support is needed. I'm surprised there wasn't a load of RAF aircraft and helicopters overhead
FSXFaulder 4 days ago
@FSXFaulder They were no 5 star hotels for them to stay in at the end of the route so they couldn't come out.
kdum8 1 day ago
@kdum8 :)
FSXFaulder 1 day ago
This has been flagged as spam show
humans are very intelligent the fact we could produce a wepon of such horror is thhe evidence however a few of our inventions come back to haunt us :(
lordcoz99 4 days ago
I just want to say; WHY THE FUCK WOULD YOU FOLLOW THE NUCLEAR CONVOY? Unless you want to be arrested or put down on the terrorist list.
Rrushi1085 6 days ago
I can understand why people of restricted intelligence would need to reduce a premise to its lowest common denominator, however there is a lot more to the reasons behind the cold war than the existance of nuclear weapons. for example, having a communist regime led by a complete nut job (stalin) sat right in the heart of Europe with his heart set on complete domination of the west. can be explained thus:
He wants to invade us. we don't want him to. got it?
mrspivvy 6 days ago
@mrspivvy Stalin wasn't even a factor in the cold war. When you consider it started in 1953, the same year in which he died. The US was (and still is) afraid of communism, especially due to its spread to other asian countries such as China. It was effectively a race to prolong or promote capitalism versus communism. Nuclear weapons were a big part of that. But they weren't a contributing factor, they were a weapon.
jackhwo1 6 days ago
This video would be far more interesting without the political bullshit and bad music.
uriituw 1 week ago
THEY KEEP THIS STUFF FROM THE TAX PAYER, ITS PAID FOR BY THE TAX PAYER,WILL PROBABLY END UP BEING USED ON THE TAX PAYER,AND ITS SUPPOSED TO BE A FREE COUNTRY LOL OPEN YOUR EYES YOU DONT HAVE A CHOICE BUT YOUR PAYING FOR IT
wakeup2theNWO 1 week ago
@wakeup2theNWO Please don't use capital letters, it is Internet shouting and very few people will read what you wrote. Also it's 'you're', not 'your'
kdum8 1 week ago
@kdum8 wrong!! you're is short for 'you are' example:"you're annoying" he said "open your eyes" which means what it says...open your eyes. NOT OPEN YOU ARE EYES!! you mong!
kezza8880 1 week ago
@kezza8880 Actually no, re-read again what you wrote. "BUT YOUR PAYING FOR IT" is what you said. This is wrong, it should be You're as in 'You are paying for it'. Contrition and humble pie and we can call it quits... ;)
kdum8 1 week ago
this is scary
dillsish 2 weeks ago
yeah right who would do it in the day light keep beliving it guys
cornishrob123 2 weeks ago
@cornishrob123 It might or it might not have been. Could have been a decoy. Why be predictable and only go at night. For this route it might be safer during the day. What would you know? Or I know for that matter? I would say there is a legitimate chance that this convoy is the real deal.
freewilly2fly 2 weeks ago
@cornishrob123 And thats why it was done in the day light, also it doesn't matter what time, day or night if they need moving they need moving, still get the same protection
GGSDavejones 2 weeks ago
@cornishrob123 What difference does it make?
do you believe people suddenly stop driving on busy roads during the evening?
Do you believe it is safe to transport nuclear weapons in poorly lit areas?
lolatmyaccounts 1 week ago
@berty
Are you a moron? Nuclear weapons need to be activated using authorization codes. They can only be detonated when the material reaches critical mass, fusing atoms together and releasing the huge amount of energy. you could drop it from space and unless the weapon had been armed it would not detonate.
littlebigsociety 2 weeks ago
@littlebigsociety Regardless that if the rocket was to be launched but the warhead not activated it is still a conduit of radiation so if to say if the shell was to be damaged on inpact it would leak radiation and people would still die by hundreds if not thousands and the area in question would be condemed.
Like Chernoby granted Chernobyl was a reactor not a rocket but at the end of the day radiation is radiation.
thebritish25 2 weeks ago
@thebritish25 You obviously know little to nothing about nuclear weapons. Go and get educated about them and then come back.
kdum8 1 day ago
@kdum8 Naw I love you too xx
thebritish25 1 day ago
@littlebigsociety P.S I dont know what the other guy said I was just pointing out the fact that if the ICBM was launched but not armed it would still do a large amount of damage.
Regards
thebritish25 2 weeks ago
@thebritish25 what do you mean? wouldn't be much worse than a rock of similar size and weight. Albeit a rock with 30kgs of HE strapped to it (there is no gaurentee that the HE would detonate on impact). The fissile material (radioactive bits) are very stable they and wouldn't result in a nuclear chain reaction. The only real risk you would have would be a relatively minor HAZCHEM situation with the fissile material breaking up. Even then they aren't dangerously radioactive.
freewilly2fly 2 weeks ago
*high speed turn*
OH SHIT WE'RE TIPPING
danteortiz14 2 weeks ago
And now our main nuclear submarine base (HMNB Faslane) is stationed 6 miles from where I live.
Thanks england!
littlebigsociety 3 weeks ago
@littlebigsociety no problem
harrychown1989 2 weeks ago
@littlebigsociety nothing to do with "england". It was created by the UK, of which Scotland is a part. We have had plenty of Scottish Prime Ministers and important MPs. Scotland is very fairly represented politically in the Union.
kdum8 1 week ago
Thanks for posting! I love our nuclear weapons. They make me feel safe.. A lot safer than these clowns driving around like drunkards.
mheslop 3 weeks ago
You're clearly filming the convoy leaving a base right? you travel along at high speed with the convoy.. still filming.. then you put a video up of the starting point, destination and date of the nuclear weapons transport clearly showing what sort of security is employed during the move...
And nothing happens... Good security.
Stiltonator 3 weeks ago
Great British Foden's and Land Rover's. Shine on you crazy diamonds!!!
Lawrence5987 3 weeks ago
umm sorry to say but the military are not stupid enough to just drive around in military vehicles fill of nuclear missiles, they transport them in secret trucks looking like tesco trucks or random ones, or some arse will just crash their car into this convoy and BOOM this is just a casual convoy.
bertybobjnr 3 weeks ago
@bertybobjnr Nuclear weapons dont just go boom driving a car into them, they have to be armed and detonated.. Im not a nuclear scientist or anything but they're specifically designed so that if a plane gets shot down carrying them and they're in burning jet fuel for hours.. They still wont go off. Think i heard that in a movie once so it must be true.
Stiltonator 3 weeks ago
@bertybobjnr it's a bit difficult to transport nuclear weapons in secret
harrychown1989 2 weeks ago
Why was the driver of this car weaving in and out of the convoy? Where they trying to provoke a response from the military/police tasked to guard those lorries?? Nuclear weapons should be respected and if you want to protest against them then fine do so, but weaving in and out of the convoy was preventing these vehicles from protecting the materials included inside the lorries and thus risking harm to the environment. These protesters are as much a danger than the USSR was during the cold war...
medic041282 3 weeks ago
Nukes aren't necessarily a bad thing in the right hands. Take the USSR and the US for an example. They're smart enough not to use it because they'll just end up killing EVERYONE in the world. However, if somebody who doesn't have the same moral compass as them (eg. Iran, terrorists, etc) gets their hands on a nuke...you're screwed.
LINES2CROSS 3 weeks ago
song name
TheCopman123 4 weeks ago
@TheCopman123
mad world
adioskater900 3 weeks ago
How did I get from watching garehh and his cheesy pasta to this?
MrLewis0804 4 weeks ago
@MrLewis0804 HAHA SAME!
Ally1502 4 weeks ago
Ok so let me get this straight: That was like a 3 nuclear warhead to 1 firetruck ratio. Derp...
1pnoe 1 month ago
@1pnoe war heads are transported split down into serperate componants
pyro999maniac 4 weeks ago
woow thats alot of terrorists, who will stop these guys from killing millions more.
darraghful 1 month ago
whats with the empty coach?
TheRabbitFear 1 month ago
@TheRabbitFear It's actually packed with british ninjas.
Thanarous 1 month ago
i lold
TheRabbitFear 1 month ago
@TheRabbitFear sunderlands away fans lol
MsPlattsy 1 month ago
@TheRabbitFear support coach to take the lorry drivers and support crews to their rest stops once they reach their destination. it also takes them back to their starting point if they have to leave the lorries at their destination
WhitakerSJA 1 week ago
seems like a rather small force to be protecting nuclear warheads... I'd expect at least one IFV or something more substantually armoured.
MadBadger 1 month ago
Fools
210482fmj 1 month ago
and humans claim to be the intelligent species... G0D Help us
AntonyThorburn 1 month ago 5
@AntonyThorburn Humans are the intelligent species, simply because we're the only species with the mental capacity to make the claim of being the intelligent species...
God help us? No he won't help. But the flying spagetti monster might.
jackhwo1 6 days ago
@jackhwo1 actually it says G.zero.D, but i'm praying to the flying spagetti monster now! Lol
AntonyThorburn 5 days ago
@jackhwo1 Acually the Cold War started in 1945 when the Allies and Soviets disagreed over how Europe should look after the war.
It hit its first crisis in 1948 when the soviet locked down East Germany in an attempted to starve the allies into submission and give up Berlin but the allies just flew over it the Berlin Airlift.
But both sides where planning to attack each other Stalin planned to "Liberate" Europe while the Allies where planning Unthinkable in late 45
thebritish25 1 day ago
@thebritish25 It's disputed amongst historians when the date for the beginning of the Cold war should be put, however nobody claims it began in 1945. Most agree it should be put in the early 50's, although the earliest I've seen it to be put is 1947. So, not 1945. And my point was that Stalin was largely uninvolved in the Cold war after his death in 1951. Considering the vast majority of the Cold war was after that.
jackhwo1 1 day ago
@jackhwo1 Stalin died in 1953.
But I see what you our saying that it did not start getting shall we say " Intresting" till the early 50s.
But the disagreements started in 1945 after the war when the Soviets refused to relent on the issue of an independent Poland the allies wanted it free as technicaly thats what the Brits went to war over but Poland was part of the Russian Empire so the soviets belived it belonged to them
thebritish25 9 hours ago
@jackhwo1 Eventually Poland did get to become its own state but it was a puppet goverment whose strings where pulled from Moscow.
thebritish25 9 hours ago
@thebritish25 Why are you giving me a basic history lesson? I've shown a clear knowledge of history regarding WW2, I don't need a refresher course thanks. You aren't giving any form of a valid point. There was no need to reply.
jackhwo1 5 hours ago
@jackhwo1 World War 2 ?? we our not talking about world war 2 we our talking about the start of the Cold War.
my point is that the cold war started in 1945 you disagree and I show my points Do I really have to explain what we our talking out??
Our you just after the last comment or something ??
thebritish25 3 hours ago
@thebritish25 What about the WW2 detail matters? I've shown an understanding of modern history, I don't need a history lesson. As I already said you didn't make any form of a valid point. There was no reason for the history lesson.
You didn't make a point regarding the beginning of the cold war, we'd moved on from that, I'd already told you it was disputed with most historians agreeing it had started in the early 50's.
jackhwo1 2 hours ago
@thebritish25 Perhaps I should start to lecture you on the communist revolution in Russia so you understand what irrelevence is. I'm sure you know lots about it, and it has nothing to do with what we were discussing.
jackhwo1 2 hours ago
@AntonyThorburn humans are very intelligent the fact we could produce a wepon of such horror is thhe evidence however a few of our inventions come back to haunt us :(
lordcoz99 4 days ago
hope the guy in the first car didn't forget his lunch!
jonny5777 1 month ago
Right, I understand the need for the breakdown vehicles, the masses of police, security forces in Army Land Rovers and unmarked transit minibusses, the mobile command unit (horse box looking thing) and the fire crews. But why was there an empty coach? Take it they were already empty by about 3:00 and people were passing them on the M'Way.
conwaytwitty33 1 month ago
Just think if the idea of nuclear bomb was never even thought of...how different the world could be. No one would be pointing nukes at each other.
joshy1066 1 month ago
@joshy1066 Think about it though, if there weren't nuclear weapons there could have been another world war between the USSR and the west. The mutually assured destruction factor that the arms race created put the both sides off attacking each other.
graemeoliver84 1 month ago 16
@graemeoliver84
still. I would have had a few million people die than a hundreds of million.
PixelationMusic 2 weeks ago
@graemeoliver84 Nuclear Weapons might have saved The West and the USSR but in the end people just want to watch the world burn for it is, one way or another WW III will happen and I can sure you that 100% along with Nuclear weapons going off. It will not just involve Governments, we are just provoking the end longer and longer and the longer it gets the worse the end will be... Just take a look at the world today and you will realize that the Cold war was nothing.
Speer2814 2 weeks ago
@graemeoliver84 Are you some kind of idiot ? The only reason the cold war happened was BECAUSE of nuclear weapons, there were litterally NO other factors, THEY had big missiles so WE got bigger missiles, THEY saw WE had bigger missiles so THEY got more missiles etc etc etc, it ended when BOTH sides decided to agree to stop making them, nukes were THE ONLY FACTOR.
Do some research before babbling your retarded warmongering shit, hell why not look in to Israel and Iran today.
SpankyRavenscroft 1 week ago
@SpankyRavenscroft There would still have been considerable tension between the two sides straight after WWII, yes the existance of nuclear weapons raised the stakes, but the Soviet Union had Stalin in charge for Christ's sake and the USSR still would have had their half of Europe which the Allies still wouldn't have been that keen on. Yes this is probably a complicated subject of debate, but why do you have be so rude and aggressive, honestly?
graemeoliver84 1 week ago
@graemeoliver84 Only thing is it only takes one mad man who doesn't care for his own life to make that launch decision and the planet dies.
danno191 2 days ago
@danno191 Obama? Cameron? They are all psychopaths, all leaders are.
wakeup2nwo 1 day ago
@joshy1066 And the war between the USA and Japan would have carried on longer.
graemeoliver84 1 month ago
@joshy1066 yeah your right no one be pointing nukes but then we have a world war 3 if russia and america didn't have nukes they would have gone to war and it saved loads of men in american soldiers in japan.
scottysqueeze 1 month ago
LOL
PLAYTHATGAME136 1 month ago
I SAW THAT TOO I WAS BUZZIN
PLAYTHATGAME136 1 month ago
I got a feeling whats in those trucks is going to be dropped in Iran one day
idonotwastenames 1 month ago
pacifism = shit like nato onu usa
awe & others, idiots, transports must do at night or dawn
PS2djX 1 month ago
I LOVE NUCLEAR WEAPONS
hoffbrand 1 month ago
`smiling buddha' brilliant name for a NUCLEAR BOMB
mranonymous96 1 month ago
imagine the state of mind the guy driving the things was in during the journey
mranonymous96 1 month ago
What the hell was the empty coach for?
MattLoaf92 1 month ago
excellent music! very surreal experience
sweetness00peace 1 month ago
I don't disagree with their use, but they couldn't have signposted it more - that circus procession basically screams "We're carrying something important!"
Nuclear weapons could still be used if, say, any of the current republican candidates gets into power in the States. But then, I was convinced Bush was going to nuke someone and he was fortunately restrained.
ownedhome 1 month ago
@ownedhome
Or if, as I suspect, everyone votes against the big three parties here in the UK (and by all rights, there's no reason why anyone would vote for any of those douches) and we wind up with some lunatic party like the EDL, BNP, Islam4UK or some other ridiculous group.
Or maybe if Putin just gets pissed off, I wouldn't put it past him either. There are images of him hunting tigers with a knife in his teeth, if only our leaders had such balls.
ownedhome 1 month ago
i dont see the problem with them. every one has one to prevent them being used on us. so all they are is a big bully body guard you nuke me and ill nuke you
101seaking 1 month ago
@101seaking That's exactly the problem. *Nobody* should have nuclear weapons, because should one be used, it would probably be the end of the world.
SquirrellOFC 1 month ago
nuclear wepons convoy with the song you just can help thinking that nuclear wepons will end the human race the ultamate power reasorce used to help each other then adapted to kill each other.
mrkillercookie2010 1 month ago
What ever happened to sticking it on the plane. Its allot quicker and safer.
JJspitfiremk9 1 month ago
britain secratly has more nukes than anyone in secret under ground bases and thay have the best ones RULE BRITANIA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
SuperJAmEzEr 1 month ago
@SuperJAmEzEr No they don't. You're retarded.
AlphonseElricl 1 month ago
these are not facts at the end, these figures was made up by the video maker...
chezzylee 2 months ago
@chezzylee Well the video's facts are sourced from a reputable source so they are not "made up"
kdum8 1 month ago
@kdum8 because every country needs to know military secrets..
chezzylee 1 month ago
how do you know that they are transporting nuclear materials
xVeRSeii 2 months ago
or loads of corned beef who knows !!
pongoose77 2 months ago
GO UK!!! xD
BLOW THE SHIT OUT OF ANYTHING
DO YOU THINK UK IS PREPARING FOR WW3 LOL ;/
TheXXxRoXyxXx 2 months ago
@TheXXxRoXyxXx the uk are PREPARING FOR WW3 we will kick ass
sjaNA306 2 months ago
Poilce Sniper was on my roof when this happened :) -- Oops i've said too much al- *smothered by pillow from behind*
ZeldaGeek1999 2 months ago 33
@ZeldaGeek1999 hahaahaha
KwHGaming1 2 months ago
Those must be the trucks known as the "beasts"?
tomcornwall83 2 months ago
why the sad song ? ruins the video
girlsdrinkfeck 2 months ago
which truck is loaded with royal marines?
harrychown1989 2 months ago
@harrychown1989 or SAS
MrH1tler 2 months ago
@MrH1tler They wouldnt use SAS on this. The guard will be a mix of Marines and navy personnel. Ive been on similar convoys with the RAF and the guard was actually known as special safety team and was mostly RAF police and a mix of airmen from various squadrons on the base. Only qualification we needed to be on the convoy was to have our weapons qualifcations up to date and attend a lecture.
allano937 2 months ago
@harrychown1989 the one with the code name "can of whoop ass"
tomcornwall83 2 months ago
Ooh, Pink Floyd!! Nice.
grumpyrozzer 2 months ago
In this state of transport a tactical nuke is harmeless only if the components are together can it be used not forgetting top secret launch codes. So you should really be concerned about the likes of iran china russia etc
spenceriow 3 months ago
@spenceriow In time you will find that the UK, USA and NATO are the ones to be concerned about. I promise not to say I told you so...
slutluvver101 2 months ago
This video really does sicken me. I used to see these convoys 1st hand when they traveled through my home town (Helensburgh about 5 miles down the road from the base). All the security, mounted weaponry police armed with sub machine guns. Driving right outsides peoples homes, workplaces and schools.
If the worst was to happen it would be in a residential area with terrible collateral damage.
And the money spent on these is a £100m hole in the countries budget which we really cant afford.
BluTrollPro 3 months ago
@BluTrollPro The worst that could happen is a traffic collision... which wouldn't effect the cargo, which is carried in seperate pieces anyway. I don't agree with making more nuclear weapons though...
04smallmj 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hope This Video Will Change Your Minds About The Olympics And Spooks The Truth Behind Everything Just Watch this Its Important.
watch?v=kFHcOw9INj4&list=FLaB8hNxjXqYabnJbvtbiqow&index=7&feature=plpp_video
Makaveli175 3 months ago
you know that its not actually a complete nuke they are transporting? They transport it in bits, its not like a whole polaris missile.
tony20001 3 months ago
one has the nuke the other is empty.....ok, people guess which one is empty LOL
boots992134 3 months ago
Comment removed
DARKJURNEY 3 months ago
lol, one guy pinned there on the floor, yes ENGLAND!
1Filmproducer 4 months ago
In these modern times i think with all these nuke's if there was a war they would kill the planet and can country's really afford nuclear wars these day !?!?!?! this earth is old now we need too let him rest !! :) ???.
TobyParr 4 months ago
Comment removed
DARKJURNEY 4 months ago
@DARKJURNEY most nuclear armed states transport nuclear weapons by ground due to cold war treaty's ban air transport of nuclear weapons. infact people got bollocked in america for transporting six warhead by air.
tisFrancesfault 4 months ago
@tisFrancesfault ,makes sense
DARKJURNEY 3 months ago
@DARKJURNEY Because there fucking Trident Missiles you dick!
Elitepoosniff 3 months ago
@Elitepoosniff ,Would you care to actually explaining what you are trying to say or just run your mouth like a little kid , also dicks are the ones that fck the pussies how from what i have writen did you derive that????????????????????
DARKJURNEY 3 months ago
Comment removed
DARKJURNEY 3 months ago
@DARKJURNEY Your English is terrible.
Elitepoosniff 3 months ago
@Elitepoosniff me ingorish es awesome
DARKJURNEY 3 months ago
@DARKJURNEY Yeah... learn some English.
Elitepoosniff 3 months ago
@Elitepoosniff , Learn some french or how about Cantonese .BTW i have spell check on always XD
DARKJURNEY 3 months ago
@DARKJURNEY The world speaks my language so I see no reason to learn other languages. I know some French and Arabic.
Elitepoosniff 3 months ago
@Elitepoosniff ,wow you realy know how to waste time
DARKJURNEY 3 months ago
@DARKJURNEY I sure do.
Elitepoosniff 3 months ago
Comment removed
SOLIDSNAKEeeXBL 4 months ago
Yes officer you are correct. I have been following this convoy loaded with various nuclear devices all day with camera in tow.
Suspicious? Well why on earth would you think someone following around a shipment of nuclear weapons with a camera all day long is suspicious?
thescarybox 4 months ago
Nearly all of our warheads are stored under the north pole in nuclear submarines. :p
BKsMassive 4 months ago
they have tow trucks in case the other trucks break down and a coach for all the drivers and that. Thats quite clever
TheMightyKinkle 1 year ago
@TheMightyKinkle Having been in the British Army, it would be fair to say you wouldn't go anywhere without a recovery vehicle when operating Fodens.
24765968 2 months ago
i n the backgrounf at arund 0:44 is that guy arrested
harrybyles1996 1 year ago
@harrybyles1996 yes ! and i put him in a nuclear reactor son, now, he is glowing in the dark !
43932 1 year ago
@43932 too right
harrybyles1996 1 year ago
they are! the terrorists thats why theres a bunch of fuckin rookies guarding the field in the middle of nowhere.... cause they know no ones settin those fuckers off. people just want to live... and they use this shit to convince you that crazy people want you dead... in reality they want your british ass out of their dieing communities with your fuckin nukes and your pathetic day jobs
Jackel313 1 year ago
tis indeed a mad world, we have to blow everything up just to get order and rights.
iRHAPEzombiies 1 year ago
there so lucky that a terrorist dident blow it up
Freeruningteamv1Fan 1 year ago
thats fucking awesome!
tomharris22 1 year ago 15
Thats one big waste of money.
NoriokoTheMagicSkunk 1 year ago
@NoriokoTheMagicSkunk And that waste of money means you sleep at night
GillyHD 4 months ago
thats one big convoy
GLove39 1 year ago