Where is the evidence? is this for real? Fossas are NOT the most dangerous animals in the World, in fact ignorant fools like you are. And it's not something to be proud of... before you feel all manly about it.
For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. John 3:16
Find the love of God here.
Audio, Gospel of John Chapter 1 AV h t t p://w w wDOTyoutubeDOTcom/watch?v=Ao4uaIjd3xs
not that I'm a non believer... But wtf does this animal have to do with the bible. This is all out in left field and the information about this animal is so off.
For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. John 3:16
Find the love of God here.
Audio, Gospel of John Chapter 1 AV h t t p://w w wDOTyoutubeDOTcom/watch?v=Ao4uaIjd3xs
fossas are amazingly interested creatures, are DEFINATELY not the most dangerous animal in the world and are vital to a healthy ecosystem. They aren't evil and should be protected and conserved.
@Dtrunit3 You cannot understand because you are spiritually dead and love darkness.
But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned. 1Corinthians 2:14
And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil. John 3:19
It is true what Dawkins said: Nobody knows the origin of the first replicating molecule. But that is not proof that there was intelligent design. The burden of proof falls on the creationists, and so far they have given no credible evidence. What Dawkins said is irrefuted. As for evolution, there is evidence all around us. And if you can't learn that, then you are pitifully stupid, and you'll never really understand any science, because practically all natural science involves evolution.
@cciemail All evolutionists have is hot air on the mostly anonymous Internet. We have the real science backed up by the $10,000 Life Science Prize. You can evolve from a chicken and win the prize or make cowardly remarks on websites until you ultimately die and become a creationists after it's too late. My last remark to you is something that everyone understands: CLUCK, CLUCK
What does the deadliest animal have to do with Satan and Jesus? Absolutely jack shit. You can always count on a creationist to preach their favorite brand of religious hogwash.
That at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of things in heaven, and things in earth, and things under the earth; And that every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father. Philippians 2:10,11
@brmadman4455 Creationists are very interested in real science, not science fiction.
All evolutionists have is hot air on the mostly anonymous Internet. We have the real science backed up by the $10,000 Life Science Prize. You can evolve from a chicken and win the prize or make cowardly remarks on websites until you ultimately die and become a creationists after it's too late. My last remark to you is something that everyone understands: CLUCK, CLUCK
@BereanBeacon1 Instead of continually challenging the people that understand biology to a contest held in a forum specifically not designed for science, why not challenge the creationists to take their evidences into the actual scientific arena?
Do you think creationists are too scared to try real science in the forum where real science is done? Because what you're doing now is comparable to issuing a biker build-off challenge and holding it in an emergency room.
lol............... what the hell was the point of that video? It's like this guy just surfs national geographic and discovery channel to find weird little tidbits of information he can just randomly apply to god. how sad :(
Theres a link to another youtube video in the description, you cant comment on that video (surprised anyone ;D). Anyway I got through the first minutes of the video, couldnt finish it....to stupied.
First up hes talking about Dawkins denying the existent of god, Dawkins is an atheist, which is a person who believes there is no god, not denying the existence of any god or gods.
Second, he refers to an interview whit Ben steein and Dawkins where they talk about the origin of life, and Dawkins say that he doesnt know how life begun, which we dont. But the commentator is so ignorant that he cant distinguish between abiogenesis (how life begun) and evolution (how life evolved when life already existed).
Anyway someone else can take it from here, take care.
@ktorch and this is the best you can do being a former Christian? I find your comment is full of half-truths and you are filling in your version of the truth to fulfill your agenda here...................
@Dajuhan2u God takes responsibility for creating satan and so evil too. Inherently, god is responsible for satan *being* evil and even allows it continue. The only way anything ktorch said would be half-true is if you somehow magically used half-logic.
And yes, most of us who are anti-theists and outspoken atheists WERE believers--otherwise--why would we care???? We don't do this for our own benefit, we just hope we could help wake someone like you up. We don't like to see people suckered.
I have seen Fossa in the forests outside of Morondava, they are very cool looking.. I was told by locals that they eat mostly lemurs and birds but not a single person ever described them as the personification of "evil".. what was that all about?
@SofaKingLoaded The narrator said the animal "might be considered the personification of evil," meaning some people might see how ferocious and dangerous the animal is and think of it as evil incarnate--not literally, but figuratively, of course.
@hellavadeal What is there to believe or not believe? Or I guess maybe I should ask, what problems do you encounter when researching it (assuming you have)?
I have studied both sides of this debate between belief and none belief and fine religion wrong but atheism even more so. God made man but man made religion. . It is a foolish argument to have.
Better to find the truth yourself and not follow anyone else. Nature has order that can only come from a design , but religion attempts to describe what cannot be defined. Atheism simply egnores what it doesn't want to believe and cannot prove it is correct.
@YourBrainOnReligion You have just proved my point that it is a stupid argument . Evolution has not been proven by science. God cannot be put in a test tube . To argue about it is an exersize is stupidity on both sides.
@hellavadeal Evolution HAS been proven by science, and in fact, has never been DISPROVEN. A significant amount of motivation FOR science is from efforts to DISPROVE theories. There isn't a single scientist in the world who would give ANYTHING to disprove Aristotle, Newton, or Einstein--LET ALONE Darwin!
God cannot be put in a test-tube because it doesn't exist; and to argue about THAT is a serious exercise* in stupidity. (note the spelling; I used to habitually mis-spell it the same way hehe)
Evolution have been disproven a number of times, and is proven to be a classic fairytale that deludes the minds of people with propaganda, and junk voodoo science, the mythology of Evolution is a hoax. There are no transitional fossils, no good mutations, etc. and Evolutionists admit it.
@Jesusisthetruevine Just because you claim that is true doesn't magically make it so. If you're going to make a grand assertion like "evolution has been disproven a number of times", common sense would tell most other people they should automatically include their example and/or their source. Every single fossil is a transitional fossil and if there are no good mutations, how are children born with hereditary traits? You're clearly loony tunes.
Actually there are no transitional fossils. "I fully agree with your comments on the lack of evolutionary transitions in my book. If I knew of any, fossil or living, I would certainly have included them. I will lay it on the line-there is not one such fossil..." Dr Colin Paterson Senior Paleontologist, British Museum of Natural History in correspondence to Luther Sunderland quoted in Darwin's Enigma 1988 p 89.
@Jesusisthetruevine ROFL... I said examples, not QUOTE MINES. I typed that beore even looking into it, and sure enough: Dr. Colin Paterson's full meaning and the context behind his statement: talkorigins (. ) org / faqs / patterson (. ) html
QUOTE MINED. You're dumb as fuck if you cannot google something you're about to repeat to make sure it's even accurate. Fucking creationists.
Same with Gould! SHOCKING! talkorigins (. ) org / faqs / quotes / mine / part1-3 (. ) html Quote #50.
@Jesusisthetruevine Lastly, unless your sole intention is to look like a COMPLETE jackass, try to find relevant and NON-DATED quotes. You're pasting shit that is 20 and 30 years old..... like, seriously?!@?! Give me a freaking break. If these crap was so ground breaking 20 or 30 years ago, why is evolution still taught and accepted on a GLOBAL scale? If you ever have the desire to pull your head out of your ass and need someone to assist you with understanding basic science, PM me.
Your wrong. They were proven wrong and you KNOW it. Radioactive Polonium halos in Granite is unrefuted for over 25 years in open scientific literature, they prove and instant creation of Granite, and debunk evolution mythology.
@Jesusisthetruevine Yawn. Personal incredulity and evidence taken out of context. This is the problem with the YEC mindset. You glom on one anomaly like it will over turn the whole fucking apple cart and ignore everything else. You know, like 3100 ft of salt under the state of Michigan. About 300 in an entirely different layer in Texas. Then there's the palynological evidence, animal and plant mass models, and on and on. Crap like that actually hurts the faith.
@Jesusisthetruevine In case you missed the point, I'm talking geology, not biology there sport. I'm not familiar enough with Gentry's work to give you a complete rundown on it, but I am aware of one instance where it was found to be in a dike that ran thru claimed post flood sediements. So, got an explanation grounded in reality to explain all that salt?
@Jesusisthetruevine And far as evolution, as far as being a dead theory, 150+ years and still going strong. With more added every day. Perhaps you've missed that part? You might want to take a very close look at this month's SciAm and the paper from Nature being discussed. Very interesting what it has to say about LUCA.
Still going strong, because there are many people who believe this deception. Evolution is a tool of satan to spread his lies, and all of it has been disproved. Thank you for suggesting that! Soon the world will agree!
@Jesusisthetruevine "All of it has been disproved"? Perchance you've got some names and references to back up your claims? Or is that just your opinion? And you know what they say about that. As for myself, MSU Lenski LTEE, among many many others (25k papers in the NCBI DB alone). Just because it doesn't fit your bronze age wroldview doesn't make it less of a fact.
Yes, I have over 25 pages of text that disprove evolutionary claims. The problem is that I cannot post much here, because the comment characters are limited here.
@Jesusisthetruevine So you think that 25 pages of web documents outweighs the 25 thousand papers in the academic press from just one source? And the fact that these principles are put to use every day? And yet, you've no problem with otherwise using the fruits of science.. Funny that part, neh?
25 quality papers are better than thousands of papers of junk science. LOL!! Give you an example. Evolutionism teaches that stalactites and other cave formations take millions of years to form. Yet, recent places that were built have many large stalactites already growing, and also a 100 year old large flowstone.
@Jesusisthetruevine You mean 25 papers that agree with your worldview. Do you know what it usually means when you're the only one saying something in spite of evidence? It means TIME CUBE. And last I looked, a cave isn't a biological structure, it's a geological one. Regardless of that, what does stalactite formation have to do with this. So, different rates from different conditions. Expected and NORMAL.
Stop making excuses. Many Evolutionists today consider Geology as a major proponent of evolution, and does not stack up to the evidence. How about vestigial structures? They do not exist. Even Scientific american states that the appendix has a function, along with other scientific sources.
@Jesusisthetruevine "does not stack up to the evidence". Now that's crap, and worst of all you know it. If you don't know it, why not? There are huge amounts of desert evaporite deposits found interleaved with maritime and lake/river deposits. And like I said before, the mass problem of both animal and plant fossils, as well as the chemical processes involved preclude it.
everything here is true except the earth is only 6 thousand years old so there was no earth 1,500 years ago.that is a scientific fact.
slr1238 5 months ago
@slr1238 actually the earth is about 5 BILLION years old (aprox)
weeniedudeisme 2 months ago
Where is the evidence? is this for real? Fossas are NOT the most dangerous animals in the World, in fact ignorant fools like you are. And it's not something to be proud of... before you feel all manly about it.
ipilincoln1515 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ipilincoln1515 Thank you.
For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. John 3:16
Find the love of God here.
Audio, Gospel of John Chapter 1 AV h t t p://w w wDOTyoutubeDOTcom/watch?v=Ao4uaIjd3xs
BereanBeacon1 6 months ago
not that I'm a non believer... But wtf does this animal have to do with the bible. This is all out in left field and the information about this animal is so off.
mrbratsch 6 months ago
wtf?
mrbratsch 6 months ago
@mrbratsch Thank you.
For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. John 3:16
Find the love of God here.
Audio, Gospel of John Chapter 1 AV h t t p://w w wDOTyoutubeDOTcom/watch?v=Ao4uaIjd3xs
BereanBeacon1 6 months ago
fossas are amazingly interested creatures, are DEFINATELY not the most dangerous animal in the world and are vital to a healthy ecosystem. They aren't evil and should be protected and conserved.
KushS96 7 months ago
more religious nonsense
Dtrunit3 9 months ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
@Dtrunit3 You cannot understand because you are spiritually dead and love darkness.
But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned. 1Corinthians 2:14
And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil. John 3:19
BereanBeacon1 9 months ago
Thumbs up if u got here when searching for Madagaskar!!
EdtheBear1337 9 months ago
It is true what Dawkins said: Nobody knows the origin of the first replicating molecule. But that is not proof that there was intelligent design. The burden of proof falls on the creationists, and so far they have given no credible evidence. What Dawkins said is irrefuted. As for evolution, there is evidence all around us. And if you can't learn that, then you are pitifully stupid, and you'll never really understand any science, because practically all natural science involves evolution.
cciemail 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@cciemail All evolutionists have is hot air on the mostly anonymous Internet. We have the real science backed up by the $10,000 Life Science Prize. You can evolve from a chicken and win the prize or make cowardly remarks on websites until you ultimately die and become a creationists after it's too late. My last remark to you is something that everyone understands: CLUCK, CLUCK
BereanBeacon1 10 months ago
What does the deadliest animal have to do with Satan and Jesus? Absolutely jack shit. You can always count on a creationist to preach their favorite brand of religious hogwash.
jmlew 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@jmlew Your time is near.
That at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of things in heaven, and things in earth, and things under the earth; And that every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father. Philippians 2:10,11
BereanBeacon1 10 months ago
Aneeboodee got sum mor detail'bout dat cat?
niark978 1 year ago
Stupid creationists.
MillyVanillification 1 year ago
LOL, and this dooms evolution how? Did God leave his engineering drawings on the rollerboard or something?
brmadman4455 1 year ago
@brmadman4455 Creationists are very interested in real science, not science fiction.
All evolutionists have is hot air on the mostly anonymous Internet. We have the real science backed up by the $10,000 Life Science Prize. You can evolve from a chicken and win the prize or make cowardly remarks on websites until you ultimately die and become a creationists after it's too late. My last remark to you is something that everyone understands: CLUCK, CLUCK
BereanBeacon1 1 year ago
@BereanBeacon1 Sure bud, you didn't answer my question. How does this doom evolution?
brmadman4455 1 year ago
@BereanBeacon1 Instead of continually challenging the people that understand biology to a contest held in a forum specifically not designed for science, why not challenge the creationists to take their evidences into the actual scientific arena?
Do you think creationists are too scared to try real science in the forum where real science is done? Because what you're doing now is comparable to issuing a biker build-off challenge and holding it in an emergency room.
TheScienceFoundation 1 year ago
Animals and women were born out of a man named Adam's rib. A giant evil snake seduced her and made an Africa tree dog the Fossa!!!
DanimalLawlz 1 year ago
no box jelly fish
bubblebomb036 1 year ago
mosquito is actually the most deadliest animal in the world
wildlife011803 1 year ago
Wow! What an animal!
ChristiansofAsia 1 year ago
omg wtFFF! Stupid ass youtube!! My last comment was posted 5 times when I came here, so I removed *FOUR* of the FIVE and now I only see ONE of:
"YourBrainOnReligion Comment removed"
How retarded!!!
YourBrainOnReligion 1 year ago
@YourBrainOnReligion why are you such a retard?
kyleain 1 year ago
@kyleain About what?
YourBrainOnReligion 1 year ago
Oh yeah the fossa.
I read about this guy. :)
Patternpop 1 year ago
lol............... what the hell was the point of that video? It's like this guy just surfs national geographic and discovery channel to find weird little tidbits of information he can just randomly apply to god. how sad :(
YourBrainOnReligion 1 year ago
Theres a link to another youtube video in the description, you cant comment on that video (surprised anyone ;D). Anyway I got through the first minutes of the video, couldnt finish it....to stupied.
First up hes talking about Dawkins denying the existent of god, Dawkins is an atheist, which is a person who believes there is no god, not denying the existence of any god or gods.
mifster83 1 year ago
Second, he refers to an interview whit Ben steein and Dawkins where they talk about the origin of life, and Dawkins say that he doesnt know how life begun, which we dont. But the commentator is so ignorant that he cant distinguish between abiogenesis (how life begun) and evolution (how life evolved when life already existed).
Anyway someone else can take it from here, take care.
mifster83 1 year ago
Even your god admits to being evil, and by my observations so are his followers.
I would be embarrassed to be called one of those. AND am embarrassed to think, once, I was!
ktorch 1 year ago
@ktorch and this is the best you can do being a former Christian? I find your comment is full of half-truths and you are filling in your version of the truth to fulfill your agenda here...................
Dajuhan2u 1 year ago
@Dajuhan2u God takes responsibility for creating satan and so evil too. Inherently, god is responsible for satan *being* evil and even allows it continue. The only way anything ktorch said would be half-true is if you somehow magically used half-logic.
And yes, most of us who are anti-theists and outspoken atheists WERE believers--otherwise--why would we care???? We don't do this for our own benefit, we just hope we could help wake someone like you up. We don't like to see people suckered.
YourBrainOnReligion 1 year ago
@ktorch In other words....you never were(if you catch my drift)
Dajuhan2u 1 year ago
@ktorch
I suppose that you're the judge and authoritative source of morality? Learn some logic ...
FillTheirVoid 1 year ago
@ktorch Hahaha where does it say that!?!
macroheart 1 year ago
I have seen Fossa in the forests outside of Morondava, they are very cool looking.. I was told by locals that they eat mostly lemurs and birds but not a single person ever described them as the personification of "evil".. what was that all about?
SofaKingLoaded 1 year ago
@SofaKingLoaded The narrator said the animal "might be considered the personification of evil," meaning some people might see how ferocious and dangerous the animal is and think of it as evil incarnate--not literally, but figuratively, of course.
talitha00cumi 1 year ago
@talitha00cumi Yeah I get that.. it was necessary I reckon for the nonsensical segue to Satan..
SofaKingLoaded 1 year ago
Man is the most dangerious animal or there would still be large pussa still in Madagascar.
I do not believe in evolution , but I do not see how this disproves it.
Thanks.
hellavadeal 1 year ago
@hellavadeal What is there to believe or not believe? Or I guess maybe I should ask, what problems do you encounter when researching it (assuming you have)?
YourBrainOnReligion 1 year ago
@YourBrainOnReligion
I have studied both sides of this debate between belief and none belief and fine religion wrong but atheism even more so. God made man but man made religion. . It is a foolish argument to have.
Better to find the truth yourself and not follow anyone else. Nature has order that can only come from a design , but religion attempts to describe what cannot be defined. Atheism simply egnores what it doesn't want to believe and cannot prove it is correct.
hellavadeal 1 year ago
Comment removed
YourBrainOnReligion 1 year ago
@YourBrainOnReligion You have just proved my point that it is a stupid argument . Evolution has not been proven by science. God cannot be put in a test tube . To argue about it is an exersize is stupidity on both sides.
hellavadeal 1 year ago
@hellavadeal Evolution HAS been proven by science, and in fact, has never been DISPROVEN. A significant amount of motivation FOR science is from efforts to DISPROVE theories. There isn't a single scientist in the world who would give ANYTHING to disprove Aristotle, Newton, or Einstein--LET ALONE Darwin!
God cannot be put in a test-tube because it doesn't exist; and to argue about THAT is a serious exercise* in stupidity. (note the spelling; I used to habitually mis-spell it the same way hehe)
YourBrainOnReligion 1 year ago
Evolution have been disproven a number of times, and is proven to be a classic fairytale that deludes the minds of people with propaganda, and junk voodoo science, the mythology of Evolution is a hoax. There are no transitional fossils, no good mutations, etc. and Evolutionists admit it.
Jesusisthetruevine 1 year ago
@Jesusisthetruevine Just because you claim that is true doesn't magically make it so. If you're going to make a grand assertion like "evolution has been disproven a number of times", common sense would tell most other people they should automatically include their example and/or their source. Every single fossil is a transitional fossil and if there are no good mutations, how are children born with hereditary traits? You're clearly loony tunes.
YourBrainOnReligion 1 year ago
Actually there are no transitional fossils. "I fully agree with your comments on the lack of evolutionary transitions in my book. If I knew of any, fossil or living, I would certainly have included them. I will lay it on the line-there is not one such fossil..." Dr Colin Paterson Senior Paleontologist, British Museum of Natural History in correspondence to Luther Sunderland quoted in Darwin's Enigma 1988 p 89.
Jesusisthetruevine 1 year ago
@Jesusisthetruevine ROFL... I said examples, not QUOTE MINES. I typed that beore even looking into it, and sure enough: Dr. Colin Paterson's full meaning and the context behind his statement: talkorigins (. ) org / faqs / patterson (. ) html
QUOTE MINED. You're dumb as fuck if you cannot google something you're about to repeat to make sure it's even accurate. Fucking creationists.
Same with Gould! SHOCKING! talkorigins (. ) org / faqs / quotes / mine / part1-3 (. ) html Quote #50.
YourBrainOnReligion 1 year ago
"The absence of fossil evidence for intermediary stages... has been a nagging problem for...evolution." Dr Stephen J. Gould, Evolution Now p.140
Mutations would not last in nature. Allyn and Bacon Biolgy, 1977 p 364.
Jesusisthetruevine 1 year ago
@Jesusisthetruevine Lastly, unless your sole intention is to look like a COMPLETE jackass, try to find relevant and NON-DATED quotes. You're pasting shit that is 20 and 30 years old..... like, seriously?!@?! Give me a freaking break. If these crap was so ground breaking 20 or 30 years ago, why is evolution still taught and accepted on a GLOBAL scale? If you ever have the desire to pull your head out of your ass and need someone to assist you with understanding basic science, PM me.
YourBrainOnReligion 1 year ago
Your wrong. They were proven wrong and you KNOW it. Radioactive Polonium halos in Granite is unrefuted for over 25 years in open scientific literature, they prove and instant creation of Granite, and debunk evolution mythology.
Jesusisthetruevine 1 year ago
@Jesusisthetruevine Yawn. Personal incredulity and evidence taken out of context. This is the problem with the YEC mindset. You glom on one anomaly like it will over turn the whole fucking apple cart and ignore everything else. You know, like 3100 ft of salt under the state of Michigan. About 300 in an entirely different layer in Texas. Then there's the palynological evidence, animal and plant mass models, and on and on. Crap like that actually hurts the faith.
NorthForkFisherman 1 year ago
Don't waste your time. Evolution is myth, and everyone will agree someday. Stop wasting your time on fickle imaginations of fantasy.
Jesusisthetruevine 1 year ago
@Jesusisthetruevine In case you missed the point, I'm talking geology, not biology there sport. I'm not familiar enough with Gentry's work to give you a complete rundown on it, but I am aware of one instance where it was found to be in a dike that ran thru claimed post flood sediements. So, got an explanation grounded in reality to explain all that salt?
NorthForkFisherman 1 year ago
@Jesusisthetruevine And far as evolution, as far as being a dead theory, 150+ years and still going strong. With more added every day. Perhaps you've missed that part? You might want to take a very close look at this month's SciAm and the paper from Nature being discussed. Very interesting what it has to say about LUCA.
NorthForkFisherman 1 year ago
Still going strong, because there are many people who believe this deception. Evolution is a tool of satan to spread his lies, and all of it has been disproved. Thank you for suggesting that! Soon the world will agree!
Jesusisthetruevine 1 year ago
@Jesusisthetruevine "All of it has been disproved"? Perchance you've got some names and references to back up your claims? Or is that just your opinion? And you know what they say about that. As for myself, MSU Lenski LTEE, among many many others (25k papers in the NCBI DB alone). Just because it doesn't fit your bronze age wroldview doesn't make it less of a fact.
NorthForkFisherman 1 year ago
Yes, I have over 25 pages of text that disprove evolutionary claims. The problem is that I cannot post much here, because the comment characters are limited here.
Jesusisthetruevine 1 year ago
@Jesusisthetruevine So you think that 25 pages of web documents outweighs the 25 thousand papers in the academic press from just one source? And the fact that these principles are put to use every day? And yet, you've no problem with otherwise using the fruits of science.. Funny that part, neh?
NorthForkFisherman 1 year ago
25 quality papers are better than thousands of papers of junk science. LOL!! Give you an example. Evolutionism teaches that stalactites and other cave formations take millions of years to form. Yet, recent places that were built have many large stalactites already growing, and also a 100 year old large flowstone.
Jesusisthetruevine 1 year ago
@Jesusisthetruevine You mean 25 papers that agree with your worldview. Do you know what it usually means when you're the only one saying something in spite of evidence? It means TIME CUBE. And last I looked, a cave isn't a biological structure, it's a geological one. Regardless of that, what does stalactite formation have to do with this. So, different rates from different conditions. Expected and NORMAL.
NorthForkFisherman 1 year ago
Stop making excuses. Many Evolutionists today consider Geology as a major proponent of evolution, and does not stack up to the evidence. How about vestigial structures? They do not exist. Even Scientific american states that the appendix has a function, along with other scientific sources.
Jesusisthetruevine 1 year ago
@Jesusisthetruevine "does not stack up to the evidence". Now that's crap, and worst of all you know it. If you don't know it, why not? There are huge amounts of desert evaporite deposits found interleaved with maritime and lake/river deposits. And like I said before, the mass problem of both animal and plant fossils, as well as the chemical processes involved preclude it.
NorthForkFisherman 1 year ago