Bomber Crashes into Empire State Building, July 1945 [Full Resolution]

[solidkid4]

and yet the building didnt fall!!!

[Barenziahlover]

My opion the world trade builting where poorly built, there where no steel beam in the middle of the builting to hold up the weight. The B-25 was carrying than full bomb load at the time which went off.

[nest1113]

Interesting thing: building stand still, not consummed on flames and didnt colapse, what can you tell me about twin towers? (plus that was in 1945 with an old old building) sry, english is not my native languaje

[HybodusStudios]

that's why stupid americans dont call this as a terorist attack cuz it was flown by fellow zionist

[SiskinOnUTube]

0:24 I reckon that explosion was faked.

[dboyneo]

U people that continue to be sheep need to understand you country is oneday going to speak like a dragon your country is not going to be safe oneday so you guys better start waking up.

[1j9k9a6]

Empire State Building > World Trade Center

[brucebu]

come on out my precious 9/11 crazies

[AfKman101]

thank god the bomber wasn't carrying any bombs, blow a fucking huge hole on the grid

[rogeralejandro2007]

was this Osamas grandfather?

[kasikkkasikkkasikk]

angry plane

[carlos1rrr111]

clear



[iLuvsify]

bush did it.

[AndeHollis]

Some people spout some shit

[mufc4lyf2011]

0:51 thats what i always land on on gta iv :D

[sh9683]

why did this not bring the tower down? because it was not a planed plane crash,

[gamezky]

Hey dipshits!!!  U cant compare this to 9/11... U just cant.

[Arianiuss]

I did not know that Al Qaida already exist in 1945, thsi terrorist hate US. The terrorist did not changed since that, the only thing that changed is physical laws.This time arab terorrist became so crazy with their hatred that they some how PULVERIZED a 200,000 ton steel frame building with all its contains.Look hatred can even pulverize steel, the only second thinsg which pulverize steel is thermo Nuklear Energy. Do not SEARCH Dimitri Khalezov, the Russian Nuklear form KGB expert, just dont do

[Dgamer21]

@Arianiuss We created Al-Qaeda dude.

[Arianiuss]

The Empire state building is much weaker then WTC, but the plain did not penetrate the building and big part of plane fell down on the street. A real crush look like this.But in some recent cases strangely the plane and the bulding disapeared and pulverized!!!May the physical laws has changed since 1945.

[Reaper91698]

More like the WTF7! Lawlz

[Reaper91698]

HOW COME I DIDNT KNOW ABOUT THIS? Oh wait im 13

[MrVenom1994]

damn osama been doing this for a while

[InsanityWolfRules]

for anyone wondering about WTC 7 it collapsed because the insides burned out completely, the fire burnt for several hours uncontrolled most videos don't show this but right before the collapse you can see the penthouse at the top of the building collapsing, the building just burnt until there was nothing left to hold up the hull

[foliuspvp]

@InsanityWolfRules your a fucking idiot, the towers were built specifically to withstand airplane impact. Jet Fuel burns at the same temperature as wood and its NOT hot enough to melt the fucking SOLID STEEL support structure, god your a fucking moron. The towers were controlled demolition, and if you think that still the airplanes took down the towers, then what about building number 7? No airplane crashed into that but the fucking building fell down like the others. FUCKING SHEEP.

[sparkey989]

@foliuspvp lolnope. You don't know jackshit about physics, sorry man.

[raspberrybaggio]

Respond to this video... Next they'll be saying WTC7 collapsed long before it actually did:) "Change we can believe in."

[foliuspvp]

@raspberrybaggio 10/10 great comment hahahah

[raspberrybaggio]

@foliuspvp  Lol, thanks man:)

[sparkey989]

@InsanityWolfRules THIS FUCKING MAN HERE KNOWS WHAT HE IS SAYING

[JDSabre]

It is so funny to look at these 9/11 videos as of late.. so many disinformationists, clearly deployed by the government... how does it feel to have no opinion at all? You are simply a product of a machine, you have no worth!

[88dragons88]

So cool how some buildings falls straight down when a plane hits them.

[themasterquebec]

Built to Last

[TheAtomicCUCUMBER]

If the WTC was 1945...

[raspberrybaggio]

I thought the whole building was supposed to collapse, if a big plane flew into it? Things that make you go hmmm.

[nippe97]

@raspberrybaggio 2 motor little bomber

[Drknoble]

@raspberrybaggio You wouldn't go hmmm if you knew anything about the empire state's architecture vs the twin towers, in that they twin towers weren't built well. And that the massive fuel (which instantly caught on fire from impact) from the much larger planes (which were built to carry hundreds not 1or 2 people) emptied into the buildings disintegrating the interior support causing the twin towers to collapse upon themselves. Knowledge is power, but unfortunalty many people like ignorance.

[TheFuzzgog]

@Drknoble controlled demolition the first plane was a light cesna i work in demolition

[bannanaboy8]

@Drknoble The offical report stated that the buildings came down from fire, which has NEVER happend before other then the twin towers, and there was a german building that sufferd from fires MUCH greater then those of the twin towers but why didnt that fall down? so what are the odds that a sientific anomaly hapend 3 times on the same day in a that could only be contolled demolition?

[Antonio001z]

@Drknoble the buildings would have been fine after the fire . . its the controlled demolition which caused the fall . . and even if they were poorly built how the fuck do you explain WTC7 coming down??

[ataraxic89]

@raspberrybaggio Perhaps. But I just did the math using Wikipedia for the weight and speed of those 2 types of planes. This is assuming max weight and speed (round about) The 767 hit with 5.614 BILLION joules of energy. And the B-25 in this video hit with 80 MILLION joules. And we can be certain the b-35 was NOT going full speed in fog and was NOT carrying max weight (bombs) in an american city. Your welcome.

[raspberrybaggio]

@ataraxic89 You're welcome, not your welcome.  You're welcome.

[ataraxic89]

@raspberrybaggio Ah, thank you. I honestly don't make that mistake often. However, it was late, so I'll let myself slide this time. :)

[ballsconstantine]

@raspberrybaggio You're a pedantic twat with no friends :D

[raspberrybaggio]

@ballsconstantine Your mum seemed to like me last night :D

[Crimeyfied]

@raspberrybaggio Are you for real? A fully fueled 2001 jumbo JETliner versus a 1945 prop-duster bomber? Wake up and sniff more gasoline, lol

[thefloacist]

@Crimeyfied You cant reason with these people.

[Antonio001z]

@Crimeyfied if you seriously believe that the two jumbos caused two buildings to come down on their own then your are an ignorant fool

[Crimeyfied]

@Antonio001z "Your are an ignorant fool" ..... speaking of, who's rocking the grammar charts with the eloquence of a first grader? Rock on, Antonio! Why don't you take on the JFK and moon landing controversies next. Please be sure to use lots of sentences.... I want as many follies and yuks as possible, lol

[ragnarhairybreek]

@raspberrybaggio A B25 is a great deal smaller with less fuel than a 747

[Vann7]

@ragnarhairybreek most fuel of the 747 on WTC exploded with the impact. good try. 

[BRITSIMdotCOM]

@Vann7 WTF

[batvette]

@Vann7 NOT. wasn't even a 747.

Oh and Gage''s group? PLEASE. They represent about 1/10th of one percent of professionals in their fields....well within the statistical cases of mental illness in the general public which is required to share their views.

AND YET not one has published peer reviewed research in a scientific journal offering an alternative theory to the NIST report. You're all nuts, ya got nuthin'!

[thebismarkandthehood]

@ragnarhairybreek but bombs?



[waitwhatwasthat]

@raspberrybaggio impecable logic there, did you do all that research yourself?

[madagent]

@raspberrybaggio Jet fuel makes a difference retard.

[foliuspvp]

@madagent your the fucking retard... jet fuel burns at the same temperature as wood you fucking idiot. Your a prime example of a fucking sheep just like all americans who just listen and believe everything the media tells them. You fucking sheep bitch. Ask questions and find out the truth for yourself don't let others do it for you. Fucking moron.

[sparkey989]

@raspberrybaggio It was all brick and masonry, that won't burn.

[benpg]

Jet at 600 miles per hour and jet fuel >propeller plane at 200 mph, you dumb fuck.

[ThisPageStaysREAL]

@benpg actually you dumb fuck, the plane that hit the world trade center was going at most, 500mph. However..this doesnt matter. what matters is the official story trying to call you a god damned idiot by suggesting that a hollow aluminum plane sliced through a building with steel on the outside and cut through the even thicker steel inside. How fast would a hollow steel bat need to swing to allow a hollow aluminum tube to slice right through it? lets think about it for a moment eh?

[benpg]

@ThisPageStaysREAL You people still exist? Even after all of the engineers, physicists and chemists who have come out and said the official story is the correct version of events? Oh right, they were planted by the government too. That's why arguing with you freaks isn't possible or worth while. Any evidence that suggests that you're wrong is seen by you as further proof of the sophistication and deviousness of the "plot".

[ThisPageStaysREAL]

@benpg I'll elaborate; can a single one of the engineers,physicists and chemists you mentioned give an explanation for the failure to slow down clearly documented when the top of the trade center dropped? The lower section that has always supported the section above the crash zone would yield an opposing force equal to/no less than the downward force of the top. Its the Conservation of Momentum law (Newton), broken 3 times in human history on 9/11, at least if the official version is correct.

[walkersam]

@ThisPageStaysREAL And what is your 'explanation' for this? Mass hallucination? Every single one of the hundreds of independent documentations being tampered with? Or the conspirators surreptitiously hollowed out the entire lower half of the two largest buildings in new york ahead of time, in a way which still stood and still allowed the thousands of people who occupied them to go about their daily business without suspicion? There's a reason people call you guys crazy; listen to yourself.

[walkersam]

@ThisPageStaysREAL In any case, you don't understand the conservation of momentum. The force acting here (gravity) is active, and it is not acting on a solid mass but on a compromised hollow tube. All the force that it required is enough to break the uprights of each successive floor, and start a free-fall, which the entire upper mass of the bldg easily did because those structures were only designed to resist the static force of the building, not an active downward force.

[benpg]

@ThisPageStaysREAL And stop pretending that you have any fucking clue what would happen if a jet hit a skyscraper. As far as I know, you haven't seen it before, and you're not the head of an engineering firm. You have no basis to make any of your absurd claims. The people who are qualified to make that estimation, our engineers, and scientists, have all stated the official account is the correct one.

[ThisPageStaysREAL]

@benpg lol.. you're funny in your own way. But in General id say the exact opposite regarding your initial comment. The one about X number of people you cant name who have come out as you put it, to lend credibility to the official version of the story. Boy, none of this would be possible to swallow in countries that soar far beyond america in terms of national education. How about this, to say the official story is right, is at the same time saying Issac Newton is wrong.

[walkersam]

@ThisPageStaysREAL Love how you people have such strong opinions yet don't even grasp the basic facts. There was no 'even thicker steel inside'; the WTC towers used an new structural system where most of the weight was carried by the steel beams of the shell. This saved a lot of weight and money while still being strong enough to stand in normal conditions, but obviously compromised the structure's ability to withstand a missile full of flaming jet fuel, compared with the more robust Empire.

[pyramid011]

@raspberrybaggio the Mitchell bomber was one tenth the weight of a 767-200ER and was going less than half the speed of the planes on 9/11. The empire state building is of a completely different design and made from completely different materials than the WTC was. The only thing similar between this incident and 9/11 is that a plane hit a building.

[Vann7]

@pyramid011 Dude in 9/11 3 steel building that were made to resist fire and planes collision. engineers are not stupid like you . they collapsed incredibly fast and the one with the heaviest security of all was the fastest to fall (WTC7) in 6 seconds and was not even hit by a plane . who are you trying to fool ? there are 1600 arquitects ,engineers and demolitions experts saying that 911 was a fraud ,demanding and investigation.

w w w . ae911truth  . org

[datzfast]

@raspberrybaggio you dont know anything about buildings do you

[MeanGene79]

@raspberrybaggio A b25 is a lot smaller than a 767. Also, it wasn't a box-within-a-box design like the Twin Towers were. Wake up, 'truthers'.

[NielsShoe]

That explosion was done in photoshop.

[NielsShoe]

Was the goverment that did it so they could order more F-22 planes the F-22 was first built in 1945 by the secret order who are jews that run the entire universe.

[MB1206]

This was a conspiracy by the government...

[dylanlawless1]

this channel's great 

[asteroceras]

7/27/1945 was an inside job. Clearly a military plane or missile.

[9dilo]

@asteroceras dude it was going to land and you have no idea what and inside job is and obulasy not a misle

[LockedGT]

@9dilo he was joking, people make claims like that about 9/11

[rock3tcat]

@asteroceras

Hmmmmm

[verysmartmart]

Glad to see the 7/27-truthers have yet to appear here :)

[owgigi]

I love the Batman-style graphics at 0:23 ! POW!