Added: 4 years ago
From: Jefflered
Views: 135,296
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (1,449)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • stupid call that was an obvious goal

    

  • I think it was probably in, but they made the right call. I couldn't really tell form the replays and I don't think they could either. Therefore there was no evidence it crossed the line...

    - A Leafs Fan

  • Cam Ward is just a magician

  • its a goal the Fing refs knew it was a goal

  • goal

  • its a good goal, but did the war room have that angle? if they did, they blew a call.

  • "Now were draggin' it oot." LOL

  • the fucktards in the office can't even show the officials the right video for their own team.

  • thats a goal

  • You figure the NHL has enough money to design a goal that could have enough cameras installed into it with protection from pucks and such to catch every little angle...this IS 2012, not 1999.

  • why didnt he just save the damn thing and save us all this trouble?

  • If the puck is notoutside the net then where else could it be?

  • Covered inside the net should be a goal

  • inconclusive...NO GOAL!

  • peanut butter

  • @disjockey44 u can see that its clearly in and u can see that he swept it out

  • Extremely clearly a goal.

  • Goal

  • Yup! Glove is inside the net.

  • goal

  • a good goal

  • a goal horn for a no goal... for the away team.

  • BOOM

  • looks like a goal to me and im a die hard canes fan

  • NO GOAL, im a Leafs die hard so before you start barking I hought you should know that, Rule is you need to see white ice between the puck ant the red line, now there is not much doubt that the puck is in the net, the rule is you can't assume it is you can see the puck across the red line therefore it is not a goal again you can not ASSUME its in doesnt work that way

  • goalllllllllllllllllllllllllll­llllllllllllllllllllllllllllll­lllllllllllllllllllllllllllll

  • No.

  • This is why i hate refs...they are fucking retarded

  • so a freaking goal

  • since it's the leafs...nope

  • GOAL

    

  • Nope

  • Looks like a goal to me, Cam pushed it out

  • GOal

  • GOAL!!!

  • Its a goal, I play hockey and you can never trust those damn zebras!

  • goal

    

  • No goal!

  • no goal!!!!!!!!!!!

  • Thats a goal dude and i hate maple laughs

  • NO GOAL!

  • pom

  • poeple this a goal ward just tooked it out of th net thets a goal stupid ruff

  • @Dhdhccg

    How the fuck can you see the puck? Got some sort of xray vision over there?

  • @Equals34evar YOU SEE IT CROSS THE FUCKING LINE watch u goof 3:16

  • I can see the puck over the line it is a goal. I think refs should be able to see the review them self not just talk about with a bunch of blind people.

  • In a perfect world, it's a goal. But it isn't, it's inconclusive.

  • Goal!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!­!!!!!!

  • THATA IN GAY REFS

    

  • GOAL!!

    

  • goal

  • no goal (:

  • 3:17.. Looks like a good goal.

  • stupid refs

  • @superdude364 dude i agree no goal stuped refs

  • its in!

  • Shroedinger's puck

  • Impossible to say for sure. The puck was either in the net, or it ceased to exist for a short period of time.

  • hate the leafs but the last replay said it was a clear goal refs r just stupid

  • Its a goal

  • so gay toronto allways scores goals and the disallow it

    

  • 4:30 she can read -fuckin bulshit- on his lip

  • she can read -fuckin bulshit- on his lip

  • r u serious????

    

  • Goal easilyyy

  • what the hell goal!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!­!!!!

  • Inconclusive.

  • who won the game?

  • Thats such a goal its unbelivable!! Go Toronto Maple Leafs!!

  • @LittleCactusMan ya your right

  • Goal

  • Will never forget when Canada beat Sweden in overtime in the world championship final with a goal like that.

  • thats a goal he grabbed the puck in the net and pulled it out.. ita a goal dumb ass

  • @11aaron5 but you need to see it on camera the puck crossing the line. at no point on camera does it show the puck across the line.

  • keep clicking on this 00:31

    lolll

  • Comment removed

  • WTF A CLEAR GOAL ... IDIOTS

  • If the goalie pulls it out and the red docent see it no goal

  • 4 years ago we cared.

  • would u stop ur arguing its already no gol weather it went in or not

  • No conclusive evidence. NO GOAL. sorry leafs.. maybe make the playoffs some day.. in the current century.

  • No goal

    at 107

  • No goal

    

  • watch the blown up replay it was a goal

  • official made the right call

  • oh yeah deffs a goal, the puck hid under his pad and when he butterfly dived his leg went back in the net thats what let the puck in

  • you cant see the puck.........so no goal....

  • it was a goal

  • Stupid refs :(

  • That was a goal

  • goallllll

  • it had to hav crossed the line

  • quick 5 sec. poll goal thumbs this up no goal thumb this down

  • nope

    

  • why does the horn go off its no goal LOL?? YAAA THEY DIDNT SCOREEE

  • That was a goal

  • YES

  • Yeah that's definitely a goal.

  • i like how when they wave it off they play the goal horn... Like HAHA we fucked you guys over a goal!

  • can't tell

  • that was a goal

  • It's not a goal because it's the Leafs who shot it.

  • Goal

  • Nope the puck was slightly in the air so it's hard to tell but not quite

  • No, Can't see it

  • goal

  • goal

  • i remember watching this game and getting so pissed lol. and it was in

  • @AnFmusic010 no it was not

  • If you look where the puck is when he shot it, It wasnt going at the goaltender at an angle, It hit off the top part of the pad that isnt over the line. The puck bounces towards the line but The goaltender put his glove slightly behind the line. It would have to be NO GOAL because 1) From the angle we have their is no eviedence that the puck was over the line 2) The ENTIRE puck must be over the line and there is not enough room for the puck to be over the line

  • damn, thats a tough one

  • it was a goal but the refs already said no goal so they cant change the call

  • @OneSoulBigDreamer They can change it if theirs eviedence agiants the refs call

  • @x30xSabresFan oh that makes sense

  • @OneSoulBigDreamer ikr! haha

    I meant The off ice officials can over rule the on ice official if they find enough evidence that this was a goal

  • @x30xSabresFan oh kk lol i feel so dumb right now but i get it :D

  • ofcourse the guy who shot it is going to think it's in

  • WHAT THE PUCK?!?!?! lol thats in

  • not conclusive....no goal

  • It *was* in, but if it's no goal on the ice, and the video evidence is inconclusive, it is no goal. You can't argue with the rules.

  • Who cares? it wouldnt change a thing because the leafs sucks.

  • its in :D

  • i think this is a goal!

  • Definitely a goal

  • goal

  • goal

  • its a goaal

  • No goal, it was VERY difficult to see the puck and there was no evidence that it was all the way past the line.

  • Joe Bowen is such a home the puck could have been 50 feet away from the net he would still think it's in.

  • it's a goal!

  • goal retarded refs suck cock

  • Where did it go ? :D

  • GOAL

  • goal

  • never mind thats a goal

  • no goal

  • goal

  • no goal

  • thats a goal

  • no goal

    

  • Best replay at 3:06.

  • goal

  • goal

  • Brutal call!

  • in

  • in

  • Goal!

  • Saw it go in, look at the corner of the net where Ward's glove goes, you can see it

  • @LitlestCutie actully no and your a leafs fan arent you?

  • @bauerhockey10

    No a Habs fan...I've been watching this vid again and it doesn't go in..my mistake...but no, I hate the Leafs lol

  • @LitlestCutie at least your not a leafs fan hahahaha

  • @bauerhockey10

    Am not, and will never be! Never! Boring team the Leafs are..

  • @LitlestCutie same!!! hahahahaha

  • nope

  • no

  • 0:29 haha i love the little "oeww"

    but i say inconclusive so no goal

  • Greatest Goal Since Selannies!!

  • no goal

  • Use some common sense. Not a fan of either team but u can clearly see ward reaching back into the net to pull it out and commadore also trying to pull it out can u not? They wouldnt do it if the puck wasnt there. Its called common sense some people should use it

  • Shut the fuck up... if we can't see clearly if the puck has crossed the line, it is NO GOAL...

  • Not enough video evidence so no goal.

  • that was a blatant goal.

  • I saw this go in without the replay

  • ACTUALLY THAT WAS A GOAL

  • That was no goal !!!!

  • totally was a goal!!!!!!!!

  • that was a goal

  • that was a goal. go blake!!!!

  • No goal. Refs know best.

  • No goal, you cannot actually see the puck cross the line

  • Why did the goal horn go on after the call was made? LOL stupid americans

  • @AtooZ17 fuck u and ur nationality

  • @MrMikev68 You want Macdonalds???!

  • GOAL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • goal!!!!!!!!!!!!

    

  • No goal, cam ward is not a noob goalie... :D

  • Wow, hard to believe that there is NO ONE left on the team from this roster, crazy how much has changed in 3 years.

  • soo glad we dont have half these players...most were overpayed underperforming players...which is great

  • That was definitely in! You can clearly see that the puck is inside the net from the ground camera view - about 3 minutes!!!

  • ahhh the beauty of net cams at least we dont have to deal with these shitty camera angles anymore

  • THIS WAS IN WHAT ZE FUCK

  • Y'all must have incredible eyes, because I can't see the puck at all in there. In other words, neither can you.

  • gggggggggggggggggggggggggggggg­oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo­ooooooooooaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa­aaaaaaalllllllllllllllllllllll­llllllllllllllllllllllllllllll­lllllllllllllllllllllllll

  • good goal cuz u can c ward pulling it out

  • goal for sure