Antigravity theory- why the universe is expanding, what powers the Sun

[VERGIS92]

Fusion of hydrogen atoms produces energy! depending on the specific element being used, a nuclear reaction may be absorbing or releasing energy

[ThePlatoon4]

dont feel like reading the comments so ill just take your word for it :p

[emdeth]

I liked your presentation it got my mind moving in a different direction.and that has got to be a good thing

[listen2meokidoki]

I absolutely agree with Jammieg001. It IS difficult to see. Especially as everything seems to work the way scientist believe it does. But that isn't sufficient. There must be more to it. It should ALL make sense. If only we didn't seem to use the word "SEEM" so often. Maybe then IT would all become clearer, even convincing. But it just doesn't seem so.

[Coolie38]

@Jammieg001 read a brief history of time by hawkin

[Jammieg001]

@Coolie38 I would like to, but I can't do that, I've been trying to understand gravity in my own way first for fun. I take it he is saying similar things, probably a lot better.

[sbergman27]

@Jammieg001 No. Hawking is not saying similar things. You're not doing yourself any service by insisting upon stumbling around in the dark with a blindfold on and your hands tied behind you. You're completely missing even the most basic things that we know about our Universe. The uniform nature of the expansion, for example. Do yourself a favor. Read a real science book. Learn how far out of your league you really are. Learn about what the 20th century accomplished. You'll thank yourself later.

[Jammieg001]

@sbergman27 Thanks for the tip but this sounds like a projection of your own insecurities.

[sbergman27]

@Jammieg001 My, aren't you overly-sensitive. I saw you stumbling around in the dark and felt it would be remiss not to point you in the right direction. There's a reason that it took hundreds of years, and the minds of Newton and Einstein, to work out gravity. And you are stubbornly ignoring that entire body of work.

But suit yourself. No skin off my nose. Just trying to save you a lot of totally wasted time. You're not going to solve any of the hard problems without understanding the basics.

[Coolie38]

Come on people it's tortoises all the way down!

[Jammieg001]

@Coolie38 Lol, what does that mean?

[0ldsage]

The BIg Bang happened at every point in space. All of space was condensed and then rapidly expanded and continues to do so, slower now but increasing. A great book explaining this is Brian Greene's Fabric of the Cosmos, he's a Theoretical Physicist at Columbia University. I had to read some passages repeatedly to understand them, but it's definitely worth it.

[Jammieg001]

@0ldsage That's what they say, otherwise why would the universe be so uniform on the grand scale? The big bang theory must be true so it must follow that it exploded absolutely equally from all points, and who could argue with such reasoning? I've always wanted to read Green's books, but more so I wanted to come up with my own answers first using the more fundamental knowledge and rules of physics and perhaps come up with a different and reasonable argument for some of these mysteries.

[Jammieg001]

@Jammieg001 I just added a new updated video to this one, a better explanation in plain and simple English with basic reasoning that the Sun and Earth must also be powered by gravity if not completely thereby challenging the helium/hydrogen conversion argument and demonstrating that gravity is creating energy from seemingly nothing, which a violation of the conservation of energy law, which means gravity must get it's energy to attract from some opposite and equal force.

[0ldsage]

@Jammieg001 Except people didn't start off believing in an expanding universe; most people believed it was static. Einstein even altered his reletivity equations to include a constant to keep the universe stable. It wasn't proposed until Edwin Hubble discovered, from red-shifted light, that the galaxies are all moving apart because of space expanding, so if they're going to be further apart in the future then they must have been close together in the past. Look up Cosmic Background Explorer COBE

[listen2meokidoki]

@0ldsage Exactly. And on that subject, it might SEEM intuitive that the Universe should be static, using the naked eye stars SEEM constant. But the problem with CONSTANT is like us suddenly stopping as Time for us stops. Yes, as such we would last forever. But for us, suspended & state NOTHING happens! Everything must grow or reduce in time. Otherwise IT, small or large does nothing. This is not like a perpetual flame. Flames are mechanisms of CHANGE. More a frozen flame. A photo of a flame.

[ElGatoLoco698]

I got a headache. Do you think you might add just the slightest bit of production value? Follow a script or don't breathe into the mic. Are you having a heart attack or beating off or something?

[Jammieg001]

@ElGatoLoco698 thank you sir, I will consider adding more BEAT OFF Value to the video for you!

[MyDutchOven]

Wow that has to be the most unlettered and misguided 'theory' of all time..... Good to see you have an interest but I think it's probably safe to say you should take time to learn the basic and get a solid understanding before theorising alternatives to dark energy.

[Jammieg001]

@MyDutchOven it's insultingly simple isn't it, I was also offended, cool name