@joerisoldier look at wikipedia why USA cancelled f-22 programme due to some major faults in it.....btw i am indian and i can feel the power of su-30 by just looking at it ...long live india -russia friendship....just wait for our PAK fa t-50 ....hahaha f-22 will hide somewhere in the jungles of USA.....lol
@MrRammsteinKicksAss What makes you think that it's old designs. And what new is in Americans? F-15/F-16?? In the hands of a skilled pilot of the MiG-29 is the best fighter to date. Who would not write. Su-27/Su-33 are multi-purpose ground-attack fighter-bomber and the same person. To produce these aircraft far more logical than doing a bunch of one-sided hooks. Finally One "Backfire" Tu-22M with a Satan on board (SS-18 = 10 nuclear heads) will be enough to destroy one of the two coasts.
Jugoslavensku ste trobojnicu odma prifarbali u srpsku ..zato su vam NATO bombarderi i srušili ukradene migove. Oteto prokleto. Kitite se Jugoslavenskim perjem.
@TESKASELJACINA o cemu ti pricas? ruska je zastava na avionu, ne pokazuje se nigde srpska trobojka!
A samim tim vasim proglasenjem nezavisnosti, vi automatski gubite pravo na jugoslovensko naoruzanje.. Imamo razlicite poglede na ratnu istoriju iz 90-ih. medije su nam napunile glavu sa svime i svacim. a u sustini isti smo narod i sad smo u istom kurcu... pozz
air battle only measured by how many aircraft do you have & how reliable it is.. if you compared just from small battle, you are totally wrong.. don't give a shit about how its been shot down by US Aircraft when just patroling or scouting. how can 1-2 aircraft to survive since the whole fleet is targeting them.
MiG 29 pilots from NATO nations (Bulgaria, Poland, Slovakia etc.) are actually better than Russian MiG 29 pilots. They get nearly a third more hours in the MiG 29 than their Russian counterparts and do more advanced training. The Russian AF might be big, but that doesn't mean it's any good.
Also, there are so many videos of Russian built aircraft crashing. How many of these aircraft were operated by NATO? Not many! Russia really needs to sort itself out!
@CasparBurgomaster Russian officials said to russian news that 70% of their 450 Mig-29's in the Russian Airforce were deadly aging, were most of them was not actually even allowed to fly. they also stated that only 100 of them are undergoing upgrades.
@JVC7400 guess what, if u collaspe their economy, thy wont have money for maintenance, just think before claiming that they are crap,lets see how well the f-16 ages if not maintained for 10 years!!!
@harris3693 I am not bashing any kind of MiG-29's. they are good aircraft. about the pilots, a russian pilot gets up to 80 hours per year in aircraft, compare it to 200 hours for an american... collapsing enemy economies like the USA or China will only give as much problems to yourself than to the other country, imagine if china boycotted the USA. the USA will suffer, but China will suffer just as much as the USA.
The reason these russian aircraft are crashing (the jet airliners) is because they were operated by some small airline with limited funds. These often skip service schedules and fly things with parts that should have been replaced. Despite this, the Russian jet airliners have a lower accident statistic for the amount of airtime and distance flown than their American counterparts.
Sorry, but very few Russian aircraft crash due to design faults. Sloppy service is the reason.
From airdynamics point there are no planes in world that come even close to russian planes. Will not even mention dev last 20 years. Russians make the perfect wing and then they start putting weapons. Americans do other way around. Regrarding arguments read below here is my statement: Nothing in trhis world can give any significant resistance to combination Russian jet fighters and russian pilots. I know this for fact.
@igrenade wtf are you saying the ne Mig-29 would eat the F-15 alive. and the mig-29 is not a copy they are nothing alike except for the fact that they both are twin engine
@Elfulcrum777 Actually the design basis of the MiG-29 was the F-15. In fact, one of the original models of the MiG-29 was an exact copy of the F-15. There is a video on youtube called The Last Generation: MiG-29. They go into great detail of its design history. Also, the MiG-29 has faced the F-15 in actual air-to-air combat and failed every time. Three were lost to F-15s in a single day. The MiG-29 has never achieved a kill on the F-15 or F-16, but has been shot down in combat by both.
@Maraudershark1 The MIG-29 has killed 1 F-16 in kosovo i think and 1 Panavia tornado in the gulf and has been used extensively in ground attack missions. the Su-27 and MIG-29 were meant as direct compititors to the F-15 and F-16 they look similar because they were basing them on stolen blueprints, but if you look at them their air frames are completely different, avionics different , handling characteristics different maybe the original design was "copied but the later designs ( S , SMT ,M) no
@Elfulcrum777 Ok, look buddy, you're just making shit up now. A total of 75 NATO aircraft were lost in the Gulf War with only ONE in air to air combat, which was a USN F/A-18 piloted by Capt. Michael "Scott" Speicher who remains the ONLY American pilot to be shot down in air to air combat since 1972. The Serbs lost three MiG-29s and did not score your imaginary F-16 kill because they were shot down BVR by AMRAAMs. Its okay to like the MiG-29, I like it too, but don't make shit up about it.
@Elfulcrum777 Look dude, you're just getting annoying now. The MiG-29 WILL have AESA while many US ADA and aircraft have been using it for years. Thrust vectoring is nothing new either. The US had it on several different type of aircraft starting in 1972 before the Su-37 even flew in 1997. Fly by wire and modern avionics is new to Russian aircraft while the US and NATO have been made it standard the 1970s. You fail and fail again kid, just give up and get on with your life.
@Elfulcrum777 If you paid attention to what I typed, you'd see that I didn't say that you said those things. I was simply stating that since the US developed those technologies DECADES ago, I'm sure they are more than prepared to deal with them. And unlike the rubbish you provided, the info I referenced is widely used around the world and is recognized by official governing bodies. Looks like you get your info from either a wikipedia or a video game. Good luck with that.
@Elfulcrum777 Once again I never said you said any of that. I only responded to the things you ACTUALLY said. I even stated that I too like the MiG-29. I work for Mitsubishi Heavy as an engineer on the F-2A/B, so my sources are from defense networks. All I can say to you is do a better job at specifying what you're trying to say, otherwise you'll come across a different way as you just did. Chose your words carefully. You seem hell bent on having the last word so have it. Goodbye.
@Maraudershark1 BTW, all of the USA thrust vectoring was only in prototype platform till the release of the F-22, man, u should stop being soo pro american and start thinking!!! BTW AESA was a patent of the USSR faggot!!! search it up!!!
@igrenade Im not in Denial i know the F-15's record i just don't agree about people saying that the MIG-29 sucks, the MIG-29 that were shot down by american F-15s were either suffering from lack of maintenence and catastrophic failures (Kosovo) or downgraded outnumbered and improperly piloted (Iraq) but if you look at mock combat particularly the German Luftwaffe and US air force exercises you can see the MIG-29 won most of those.
@Elfulcrum777 The MiG-29 isnt a shitty platform and neither is the F-15. They both have advantages and disadvantages. The Serbian MiGs lacked trained pilots as well as the Iraqi MiGs and the majority of the ones destroyed in Iraq where on the ground. The F-15 has the advantage over advanced radar and jamming systems. Luftwaffe MiGs are still down graded and are dogfighters at best. But now the MiG is second rate behind the F-18, F-22 & F-35 fighters
@Elfulcrum777 Two Serbian MiG were destroyed by F16 and three by F15 an one crashed (engine problems). one MIG 29 shot down F16 and missile system has shot down F-117 and a few of American airplanes were damaged but landed or crashed in Croatia. 1999 Serbian did not have money for ammunition for infantry and tanks. all 14 airplanes had engine problems and radars were in very bad condition. only 6 of them against all NATO and America. That was not a war for Kosovo that was a war against Serbia.
@Luka464 Exactly i read about that too not even the targeting systems on the MiGs were working, people just say its a crappy plane, but fail to understand the circumstances surrounding their defeat these migs did not have what was needed to combat the USAF , if they had been working properly it would have been different results i think
@igrenade Two Serbian MiG were destroyed by F16 and three by F15 an one crashed (engine problems). one MIG 29 shot down F16 and missile system has shot down F-117 and a few of American airplanes were damaged but landed or crashed in Croatia. 1999 Serbian did not have money for ammunition for infantry and tanks. all 14 airplanes had engine problems and radars were in very bad condition. only 6 of them against all NATO and America. I think the numbers were against them!!!
it is a fact that american/NATO pilots get a lot more training then other nations' pilots. Now to be fully honnest, the f15 can kiss any airplane's ass with its power/weight ratio above 1, and this wonderful combination of electronics and deadly weaponry. Coming back to training, the more you do something the more skilled you get to it, that's USAF strength.
@JVC7400 What? I said that Indian and Russian Air force pilots are capable flyers and would have made better use of the Mig 29 and matched to the USAF pilots.
@JVC7400 I'm saying that if they are serbian pilots, they are probably not trained in serbia, more like russia, so if they get the same education as the russian pilots, you are saying they are the same..
@JVC7400 Several MiG-29 have also been shot down by the Su-27, which has also never been itself shot down in air-to-air combat. What's more, F-15 which have encountered the MiG-29 were usually flown by the U.S. and/or Israeli Air Forces;,able to depend on immense electronic warfare and/or jamming support to blind the older, export-model enemy radars. Ethiopian Su-27 had no such support/protection, and performed flawlessly even where older Eritrean MiG-29 were able to acquire and open fire.
@I2ussia Sure, but remember the fact that a air-kill/death ration of 150/0 the F15 is the most succesful modern fighter. However, discussing which one is better a F15 over a Su-27, is far diffrent. I was talking about F16 / Mig-29 btw
@JVC7400 In Serbia? That might be because the Serbians were operating a 'basic' MiG-29, and Serbian pilots aren't known for being as well trained as NATO pilots.
@EdwardJayPumpkinhead I dont know what version, the F16 was not new, the Mig could have either been old or new. besides, the owner of the video removed my comment, maybe it was too sensitive?
Also, pay attention to the fact, that MiG-29UBT, just like the original MiG-29UB and the two-seat version of MiG-29s predecessor, the MiG-23UB, has no radar. There is however, a radar-fitted two-seat Fulcrum. It is called the MiG-35. The cockpit is moved further, thus giving necessary room for radar.
Hey everyone. It is true, that the SMT and UBT (which are portrayed in this video) versions of the MiG-29 look different due to the huge "spine"-based fuel tank, which ruins the aesthetic shape of the original.
It is also true, that you shouldn't compare the MiG-29 to the F-15, but much rather to the F-16 which is of the same class. F-15 should be compared to the MiGs bigger brother, the Sukhoi.
Eagle Family: -F-15C/D Eagle -F-15DJ/J Peace Eagle -F-15E Strike Eagle -F-15I Thunder -F-15S Desert Eagle -F-15K Slam Eagle -F-15SG Singapore Strike Eagle -New F-15SE Silent Eagle (w/ Radar Absorbent Material, Internal Carriage, Canted Vertical Tails, DEWS, & other new Gen. kits to add to the avionics & wings). F-15 undefeated kill ratio 104:0. Sukhoi fighters are too chicken to get in fight in real air combat in real shutdown. Mig fighters are too easy to shoot it down (USAAIRPOWER)
it seems like the russians are always one step ahead of the us in terms of fighter jet manouverability. and who cares that the us fighters have better track records than the russians, they were flown by a bunch of middle eastern niggers who didnt even know how to use their jets correctly. if it were russian or indian pilots it probably would have been different,
they use the main intakes when flying, and use the top ones when taxing along the tarmac,
basically its prevents F.O.D (foregn object damage) if a single bolt gets sucked into the main intakes it stuffs up the whole plane. Ingenius idea i reckon
@salman501 the mig 29 was designed to be able to do rough field operations to stop all the crap being sucked up and destroying the engines it was designed to cover the main intakes and take air in through its upper surfaces thus saving the engines
@salman501 Those intake doors slows down the air at super sonic speeds. If the aircraft is traveling at super sonic, the air would be traveling through the engine so fast that the it would have a really hard time keeping combustion. Those doors slow the air down just below super sonic speeds while keeping up with airpressure so that the engines have time to compress and ignite.
Who cares about American aircraft anymore the Russians & Chinese have won. Maybe we can trade some of those outdated aircarft carriers to the Chinese for all of the Bonds they hold. I would give them Hawaii too. Since the native Hawaiians now count themselves as part of the seemingly endless list of those aggreived by America. I suspect the Chinese will honor and respect the Native Hawaiian culture just like they do with Tibet.
Mate the F-14 was a piece of shit at dogfighting. Well actually it was a piece of shit in general anyway. When I saw "phoenix," I immediately laughed my ass off because it was a horrible missile from the start. Face it, the Mig-29,as a matter of fact, any plane, shits on the Fail-14, really badly
@Tomcatsux4ever Still turning and definitely burning in WWI biplanes I see. ;) F-14 role was not to mix it up, but fleet defense. Any plane? There's two Fitters sitting at the bottom of the Med that say otherwise. But as you seem to like hyperbole and fantastic claims: You haven't addressed the Tomcat's abilities in Guardian and Battloid Modes. :D
It makes no difference really, the bottom line was that the F-14 is a worthless piece of shit. Why else would they shred them and dump them in the ocean like they piece of shit they are. LOL
@Tomcatsux4ever Because they didn't want them to fall into Iranian hands? Too valuable to just sit in a boneyard? Their record against the Zentradi is clear though. They kick ass. :)
Mate they knew the F-14 was a piece of shit, not just because of Iran. Besides, Iran has F-4s, but you dont see them getting shredded dont you? That's because they knew the F-4 was not a piece of shit like the tomcrap was. LOL
@Tomcatsux4ever The F-14 replaced the F-4, which is a dime a dozen. Iran can get F-4 parts anywhere. The best thing about the F-14 is *you* hate it and dedicate your time and energy to badmouthing it. F-14 wins. =)
Mate please. A lot of people hate F-14s because it was a piece of shit. Did you know that the F-14 getting shredded was the best thing to happen in aviation? It's not an opinion, it's the truth =)
@Tomcatsux4ever Do you do drugs? The F-14 could fly faster, higher, further, and carry a greater weapons load than most fifther generation fighters being developed. This includes the SuperHornet, MiG35, F-22, and yes...even the short legged Eurofighter. The F-14 withough TV could achieve 80+ Alpha at close to mach 0.7. The Su-27 cannot do this even with empty weapons load. Plus the IAF achieve 146:1 kill ration...dumbass.
@Tomcatsux4ever HAHA!!! I was hoping you'd say some stupid shit like that! This where I make you look even stupider than you really are. I'm about to light you ass up. So, according you to manuverability is the winning factor of air combat right? F6F Hellcat cold not out manuver a single INAF fighter yet had an unbeaten kill ratio of 19:1.
@Tomcatsux4ever The Hellcat proved to be the most successful aircraft in naval history, destroying 5,271 aircraft while in service with the U.S. Navy and U.S. Marine Corps (5,163 in the Pacific . But this is only the beginning. You see, manuverability is only one advantage. You can turn, but you cannot climb, or dive. This means you will die. Lack of range means lack of efficiency and time over target.
@Tomcatsux4ever Lack of weapons load means less fighting ability. You really are a stupid ass. Plus I've a got a video link here of an F/A-18 doing a cobra..and GUESS WHAT...with no thrust vectoring!!
@Tomcatsux4ever And by the way dumbass, anybody who's aware of the Tomcat's 146:1 kill ratio would know that by IAF i was referring to the Iran Air Force, not Isreali you jackass.
@Tomcatsux4ever The F-14 had great manuverabilty at any speed because its variable geometry wings were always in perfect position of to give the aircraft quick responce. That was the whole point of the wings, not just to save space. Also look at the cowlings (later added to the YF-17) and the pelvic fins. You don't know much about aerodynamics do you?
@mikeyphoenix1 Ha ha ha i like the way you replied to Tomcatsux4ever. The F-14 has a great maneuverability at any speed. May be you can take an F-14 and try to maneuver at a speed of 1 Mach. You can see your Balls come out of your mouth. And by the way Mr. Yankee, you can check the spelling of "Maneuverability" before making big comments. Ha ha ha , the way you write shows you know too much about aerodynamics.
@Criticalmass235 Yep, I have a bachelor's degree in aerospace engineering from ERAU, but because I misspelled one word means I don't know shit about aerodynamics. I type fast because I don't have all day to spend on this cluster fuck of a web site and impress morons like you and sux4ever. Oh, and by the way..."May be" is one word. Guess you don't anything about aerodynamics either. When I want lip from you I'll scrape it off my zipper. Love always...Mr. Yankee.
@mikeyphoenix1 Hi Yankee, I am not denying that you don't know shit about aerodynamics. Ha ha... I believe you know ONLY SHIT about aerodynamics. By the way the way you react to peoples comments, reflects the profile of your classic education.
too bad F15 breaks apart in mid air. Also indian air force was able to take out F15 & 16 with their su27 and mig 29 during training. This was a wakeup call for the USAF. You can google it also.
@djsal510 The F-15 is 38 years old. It totally crushed the newer MiG29 in actual air-to-air combat. The MiG29s were newer and the pilots were verterans. They were trained by Russian MiG29 pilots for close to two years and only the most experienced combat veterans were allowed to fly them in combat. Not a single US F-15 pilot that shot them down had any experience. One F-15 broke up in mid air, but over 107 Soviet aircraft have been broken up by the F-15. Doesn't seem superior to me.
@djsal510 That's funny, because when I googled F-15 vs Mig 29 all I found were the reports of 16 MiG29s being shot down by F-15s and 6 being shot down by F-16s. And this was actual air-to-air combat, not exercises. And before you say that these were outdated MiG29s, remember that both the F-15 and F-16 are older aircraft.
Mig-29 is a copy of the F-15. Russians are good at that, but they designed it with short legs. The plane can only fly about 700 km or 430 miles on a single fill.
In 1969 the Soviet Union learned of the U.S. Air Force's "F-X" program, which resulted in the F-15 Eagle. The Soviet leadership soon realized that the new American fighter would represent a serious technological advantage over existing Soviet fighters. What was needed was a better-balanced fighter with both good agility and sophisticated systems.
In response, the Soviet General Staff issued a requirement for a Perspektivnyy Frontovoy Istrebitel (PFI, literally "Perspective Frontline Fighter", roughly "Advanced Frontline Fighter").[5] Specifications were extremely ambitious, calling for long range, good short-field performance (including the ability to use austere runways), excellent agility, Mach 2+ speed, and heavy armament. - Great Book of Moder Warplanes, Mike Spick
Let's not forget that they never flew against the Russian pilots. And the Russians sold their planes to other countries which were probably not that experienced in flying them as the Russians are.
Seal yourself with holy spirit! Be holy, Root out your eyes for causing you to watch violence and pornography, cut away your sexual organs that lead you to adultery, sodomy, fornication, masturbation etc. Drink muriatic acid for smoking, abusing alcohol and drugs. Slit your throat for bowing to idols such as flag and crucifix. Do not attend church meetings, end Christendoom, restore Christian unity [Christianity], no church, no division!
But let be honest. The Russian forces are not good organised and the US forces are struggling in Iraq and Afghanistan. Just like the Israelis shooting and doing crimes. Bastards.
@randominitializer i agree. the pak fa would be an equal opponent for the raptor. but still thats assuming that it even gets put into production, and if the pilots get enough training. russian pilots dont get as much training as us pilots, but their jets are cooler in my opinion. and it may be several years until its even ready to be mass produced.
@Mrfunkymonkey109 there are quite a few Russian pilots who are considered some of the most expert and experienced fighter pilots in the world. Russia has a grueling pilot training program, a legacy of Soviet Air Force.
why many russian pilots are old ?
FITHRI1000 2 months ago
LOL@ idiots who quote wikipedia. There is a lot of incorrect info. there. They may work in Euro universities but not in the U.S.
Warpath2198 3 months ago
hermosa aeronave, tengo una maqueta a escala sobre el cpu
2743v3r 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@joerisoldier look at wikipedia why USA cancelled f-22 programme due to some major faults in it.....btw i am indian and i can feel the power of su-30 by just looking at it ...long live india -russia friendship....just wait for our PAK fa t-50 ....hahaha f-22 will hide somewhere in the jungles of USA.....lol
MrPrateeklodha 4 months ago
Comment removed
MrPrateeklodha 4 months ago
Comment removed
MrPrateeklodha 4 months ago
Comment removed
MrPrateeklodha 4 months ago
Comment removed
MrPrateeklodha 4 months ago
listen up. i work in the USAF as f-22 pilot. i shot with my f-22 raptor, 6 mig's down :S. so, your choise which plane you fly ;)
joerisoldier 4 months ago
@joerisoldier Russian jets r best u moron...even mig 21 can blow ur f-22 assss.....lol
MrPrateeklodha 4 months ago 7
@joerisoldier You just young fool.
DmitryBaranov87 3 months ago
@DmitryBaranov87 nah, not really
joerisoldier 3 months ago
@joerisoldier
you can't even spell - I don't think they let people without education fly planes.
Suyamu 2 months ago
Song Please
MrPrateeklodha 4 months ago
what kind of song is this?
chocolateia 5 months ago
The only thing migs r good for are air shows and target practice
osubuckeyes65 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
F22 Raptor and Eurofighter Typhoon can do the same maneuvers if not better than MIG,,, but only in the simulator,)))
Tankerlpd 7 months ago
gotta love the mig!
0shizznes0 7 months ago
typical for Russians: Simple and old but reliable
MrRammsteinKicksAss 8 months ago
@MrRammsteinKicksAss What makes you think that it's old designs. And what new is in Americans? F-15/F-16?? In the hands of a skilled pilot of the MiG-29 is the best fighter to date. Who would not write. Su-27/Su-33 are multi-purpose ground-attack fighter-bomber and the same person. To produce these aircraft far more logical than doing a bunch of one-sided hooks. Finally One "Backfire" Tu-22M with a Satan on board (SS-18 = 10 nuclear heads) will be enough to destroy one of the two coasts.
DmitryBaranov87 3 months ago
Т-50 замена F-22
viktor19ss 8 months ago
Хуйня ваш F и ABRAMS,чем они лучше
viktor19ss 8 months ago
rouse is out of date
zia685 9 months ago
Jugoslavensku ste trobojnicu odma prifarbali u srpsku ..zato su vam NATO bombarderi i srušili ukradene migove. Oteto prokleto. Kitite se Jugoslavenskim perjem.
TESKASELJACINA 9 months ago
@TESKASELJACINA o cemu ti pricas? ruska je zastava na avionu, ne pokazuje se nigde srpska trobojka!
A samim tim vasim proglasenjem nezavisnosti, vi automatski gubite pravo na jugoslovensko naoruzanje.. Imamo razlicite poglede na ratnu istoriju iz 90-ih. medije su nam napunile glavu sa svime i svacim. a u sustini isti smo narod i sad smo u istom kurcu... pozz
MaSteRbLaSteRBG 7 months ago
air battle only measured by how many aircraft do you have & how reliable it is.. if you compared just from small battle, you are totally wrong.. don't give a shit about how its been shot down by US Aircraft when just patroling or scouting. how can 1-2 aircraft to survive since the whole fleet is targeting them.
blackchoc777 9 months ago
It mig 29 super speed, of wold
France end Brazil. camo soom
fabricio7297 10 months ago
Russians air force would destroy chinas air force.
ayden212 10 months ago
MiG 29 pilots from NATO nations (Bulgaria, Poland, Slovakia etc.) are actually better than Russian MiG 29 pilots. They get nearly a third more hours in the MiG 29 than their Russian counterparts and do more advanced training. The Russian AF might be big, but that doesn't mean it's any good.
Also, there are so many videos of Russian built aircraft crashing. How many of these aircraft were operated by NATO? Not many! Russia really needs to sort itself out!
CasparBurgomaster 11 months ago
@CasparBurgomaster Russian officials said to russian news that 70% of their 450 Mig-29's in the Russian Airforce were deadly aging, were most of them was not actually even allowed to fly. they also stated that only 100 of them are undergoing upgrades.
JVC7400 10 months ago
@JVC7400 guess what, if u collaspe their economy, thy wont have money for maintenance, just think before claiming that they are crap,lets see how well the f-16 ages if not maintained for 10 years!!!
harris3693 9 months ago
@harris3693 I am not bashing any kind of MiG-29's. they are good aircraft. about the pilots, a russian pilot gets up to 80 hours per year in aircraft, compare it to 200 hours for an american... collapsing enemy economies like the USA or China will only give as much problems to yourself than to the other country, imagine if china boycotted the USA. the USA will suffer, but China will suffer just as much as the USA.
JVC7400 9 months ago
@JVC7400 good point made!!!
harris3693 9 months ago
@CasparBurgomaster
The reason these russian aircraft are crashing (the jet airliners) is because they were operated by some small airline with limited funds. These often skip service schedules and fly things with parts that should have been replaced. Despite this, the Russian jet airliners have a lower accident statistic for the amount of airtime and distance flown than their American counterparts.
Sorry, but very few Russian aircraft crash due to design faults. Sloppy service is the reason.
McLarenMercedes 5 months ago
From airdynamics point there are no planes in world that come even close to russian planes. Will not even mention dev last 20 years. Russians make the perfect wing and then they start putting weapons. Americans do other way around. Regrarding arguments read below here is my statement: Nothing in trhis world can give any significant resistance to combination Russian jet fighters and russian pilots. I know this for fact.
DeanHannah 11 months ago 22
russian miltary equipment has something alien to it..design i mean.Which is cool.
MrMethadrine 11 months ago 10
What is the door inside the intake for the engine used for and what is its purpose?
DellDude 1 year ago
@DellDude so debris doesnt get into the engine while taxiing to the runway
harris3693 9 months ago
The best of the best.
texao2011 1 year ago
Comment removed
Ksegger 1 year ago
I gotta admit American planes are pure shit next to the latest Fulcrum and Flanker variants.
Ksegger 1 year ago
f15 > this cheap copy
igrenade 1 year ago
@igrenade lol, totally agree
natedawgninety4 1 year ago
@igrenade wtf are you saying the ne Mig-29 would eat the F-15 alive. and the mig-29 is not a copy they are nothing alike except for the fact that they both are twin engine
Elfulcrum777 1 year ago
@Elfulcrum777 Actually the design basis of the MiG-29 was the F-15. In fact, one of the original models of the MiG-29 was an exact copy of the F-15. There is a video on youtube called The Last Generation: MiG-29. They go into great detail of its design history. Also, the MiG-29 has faced the F-15 in actual air-to-air combat and failed every time. Three were lost to F-15s in a single day. The MiG-29 has never achieved a kill on the F-15 or F-16, but has been shot down in combat by both.
Maraudershark1 1 year ago
@Maraudershark1 The MIG-29 has killed 1 F-16 in kosovo i think and 1 Panavia tornado in the gulf and has been used extensively in ground attack missions. the Su-27 and MIG-29 were meant as direct compititors to the F-15 and F-16 they look similar because they were basing them on stolen blueprints, but if you look at them their air frames are completely different, avionics different , handling characteristics different maybe the original design was "copied but the later designs ( S , SMT ,M) no
Elfulcrum777 1 year ago
@Elfulcrum777 Ok, look buddy, you're just making shit up now. A total of 75 NATO aircraft were lost in the Gulf War with only ONE in air to air combat, which was a USN F/A-18 piloted by Capt. Michael "Scott" Speicher who remains the ONLY American pilot to be shot down in air to air combat since 1972. The Serbs lost three MiG-29s and did not score your imaginary F-16 kill because they were shot down BVR by AMRAAMs. Its okay to like the MiG-29, I like it too, but don't make shit up about it.
Maraudershark1 1 year ago
Comment removed
Elfulcrum777 1 year ago
Comment removed
Elfulcrum777 1 year ago
Comment removed
Elfulcrum777 1 year ago
@Elfulcrum777 Look dude, you're just getting annoying now. The MiG-29 WILL have AESA while many US ADA and aircraft have been using it for years. Thrust vectoring is nothing new either. The US had it on several different type of aircraft starting in 1972 before the Su-37 even flew in 1997. Fly by wire and modern avionics is new to Russian aircraft while the US and NATO have been made it standard the 1970s. You fail and fail again kid, just give up and get on with your life.
Maraudershark1 1 year ago
Comment removed
Elfulcrum777 1 year ago
@Elfulcrum777 If you paid attention to what I typed, you'd see that I didn't say that you said those things. I was simply stating that since the US developed those technologies DECADES ago, I'm sure they are more than prepared to deal with them. And unlike the rubbish you provided, the info I referenced is widely used around the world and is recognized by official governing bodies. Looks like you get your info from either a wikipedia or a video game. Good luck with that.
Maraudershark1 1 year ago
Comment removed
Elfulcrum777 1 year ago
@Elfulcrum777 Once again I never said you said any of that. I only responded to the things you ACTUALLY said. I even stated that I too like the MiG-29. I work for Mitsubishi Heavy as an engineer on the F-2A/B, so my sources are from defense networks. All I can say to you is do a better job at specifying what you're trying to say, otherwise you'll come across a different way as you just did. Chose your words carefully. You seem hell bent on having the last word so have it. Goodbye.
Maraudershark1 1 year ago
@Maraudershark1 BTW, all of the USA thrust vectoring was only in prototype platform till the release of the F-22, man, u should stop being soo pro american and start thinking!!! BTW AESA was a patent of the USSR faggot!!! search it up!!!
harris3693 9 months ago
@Elfulcrum777
have fun being in denial while f15 gets double digit kill ratio against the shitmig.
don't qq and type paragraphs back, it's all gonna be tl;dr.
igrenade 1 year ago
@igrenade Im not in Denial i know the F-15's record i just don't agree about people saying that the MIG-29 sucks, the MIG-29 that were shot down by american F-15s were either suffering from lack of maintenence and catastrophic failures (Kosovo) or downgraded outnumbered and improperly piloted (Iraq) but if you look at mock combat particularly the German Luftwaffe and US air force exercises you can see the MIG-29 won most of those.
Elfulcrum777 1 year ago
@Elfulcrum777
tl;dr
cool story bro etc.
mig sucks.
igrenade 1 year ago
@igrenade Wellyou are obviously very narrow minded about this so good bye
Elfulcrum777 1 year ago
@Elfulcrum777
said the narrow minded, misinformed idiot in denial.
igrenade 1 year ago
@igrenade i don't know why you say im in denial , i already admited the F-15 has a better record, so you are wrong
Elfulcrum777 1 year ago
@Elfulcrum777
nah u
igrenade 1 year ago
@igrenade now you are just being childish
Elfulcrum777 1 year ago
@Elfulcrum777
;)
igrenade 1 year ago
@Elfulcrum777
;)
igrenade 1 year ago
@igrenade LOL
Elfulcrum777 1 year ago
@Elfulcrum777 The MiG-29 isnt a shitty platform and neither is the F-15. They both have advantages and disadvantages. The Serbian MiGs lacked trained pilots as well as the Iraqi MiGs and the majority of the ones destroyed in Iraq where on the ground. The F-15 has the advantage over advanced radar and jamming systems. Luftwaffe MiGs are still down graded and are dogfighters at best. But now the MiG is second rate behind the F-18, F-22 & F-35 fighters
DonCarlito2007 1 year ago
@Elfulcrum777 Two Serbian MiG were destroyed by F16 and three by F15 an one crashed (engine problems). one MIG 29 shot down F16 and missile system has shot down F-117 and a few of American airplanes were damaged but landed or crashed in Croatia. 1999 Serbian did not have money for ammunition for infantry and tanks. all 14 airplanes had engine problems and radars were in very bad condition. only 6 of them against all NATO and America. That was not a war for Kosovo that was a war against Serbia.
Luka464 11 months ago
@Luka464 Exactly i read about that too not even the targeting systems on the MiGs were working, people just say its a crappy plane, but fail to understand the circumstances surrounding their defeat these migs did not have what was needed to combat the USAF , if they had been working properly it would have been different results i think
Elfulcrum777 11 months ago
@igrenade Two Serbian MiG were destroyed by F16 and three by F15 an one crashed (engine problems). one MIG 29 shot down F16 and missile system has shot down F-117 and a few of American airplanes were damaged but landed or crashed in Croatia. 1999 Serbian did not have money for ammunition for infantry and tanks. all 14 airplanes had engine problems and radars were in very bad condition. only 6 of them against all NATO and America. I think the numbers were against them!!!
Luka464 11 months ago
@Luka464
tl;dr american victory
/end
igrenade 11 months ago
i meant kick any airplane's ass
mimoh213 1 year ago
it is a fact that american/NATO pilots get a lot more training then other nations' pilots. Now to be fully honnest, the f15 can kiss any airplane's ass with its power/weight ratio above 1, and this wonderful combination of electronics and deadly weaponry. Coming back to training, the more you do something the more skilled you get to it, that's USAF strength.
mimoh213 1 year ago
Comment removed
kedharf1 1 year ago 2
@kedharf1 well that means if they were trained in russia, they got poor education?
JVC7400 1 year ago
@JVC7400 What? I said that Indian and Russian Air force pilots are capable flyers and would have made better use of the Mig 29 and matched to the USAF pilots.
kedharf1 1 year ago
@JVC7400 I'm saying that if they are serbian pilots, they are probably not trained in serbia, more like russia, so if they get the same education as the russian pilots, you are saying they are the same..
JVC7400 1 year ago
@JVC7400 Several MiG-29 have also been shot down by the Su-27, which has also never been itself shot down in air-to-air combat. What's more, F-15 which have encountered the MiG-29 were usually flown by the U.S. and/or Israeli Air Forces;,able to depend on immense electronic warfare and/or jamming support to blind the older, export-model enemy radars. Ethiopian Su-27 had no such support/protection, and performed flawlessly even where older Eritrean MiG-29 were able to acquire and open fire.
I2ussia 1 year ago
@I2ussia Sure, but remember the fact that a air-kill/death ration of 150/0 the F15 is the most succesful modern fighter. However, discussing which one is better a F15 over a Su-27, is far diffrent. I was talking about F16 / Mig-29 btw
JVC7400 1 year ago
@JVC7400 In Serbia? That might be because the Serbians were operating a 'basic' MiG-29, and Serbian pilots aren't known for being as well trained as NATO pilots.
EdwardJayPumpkinhead 1 year ago
@EdwardJayPumpkinhead I dont know what version, the F16 was not new, the Mig could have either been old or new. besides, the owner of the video removed my comment, maybe it was too sensitive?
JVC7400 1 year ago
Also, pay attention to the fact, that MiG-29UBT, just like the original MiG-29UB and the two-seat version of MiG-29s predecessor, the MiG-23UB, has no radar. There is however, a radar-fitted two-seat Fulcrum. It is called the MiG-35. The cockpit is moved further, thus giving necessary room for radar.
Simbirsk2130 1 year ago
Hey everyone. It is true, that the SMT and UBT (which are portrayed in this video) versions of the MiG-29 look different due to the huge "spine"-based fuel tank, which ruins the aesthetic shape of the original.
It is also true, that you shouldn't compare the MiG-29 to the F-15, but much rather to the F-16 which is of the same class. F-15 should be compared to the MiGs bigger brother, the Sukhoi.
Simbirsk2130 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
gman4eva9 1 year ago
The Mig-29 is so easy to fly. It's got the qualityf a Cadillac and a Porsche at the same time. Only rhe F-15 Eagle arrives cloes...
Heterogenius1 1 year ago
The Mig-29 is so easy to fly. It's got the qualityf a Cadillac and a Porsche at the same time.
Heterogenius1 1 year ago
it seems like the russians are always one step ahead of the us in terms of fighter jet manouverability. and who cares that the us fighters have better track records than the russians, they were flown by a bunch of middle eastern niggers who didnt even know how to use their jets correctly. if it were russian or indian pilots it probably would have been different,
Mrfunkymonkey109 1 year ago
@Mrfunkymonkey109 Yes, but just remember that 4/5 kills in air combat is achieved in BVR combat not dogfight.
JVC7400 1 year ago
Saw one MIG-29 take off yesterday. it went almost vertical after take off. Trailing black smoke, it look's like a missile launch from far off.
phadil 1 year ago
Badass jet, I fly it on FC2. :)
Shinobi342 1 year ago
what is that above the canopy? it looks like a hatch or something. you can see it on the landing.
drod103164 1 year ago
Damn thats a heavy payload
Aviator1111 1 year ago
ANY ONE EVER PLAYED LETHAL SKIES ELITE PILOT TEAM SW?
KICK ASS GAME
ck5550005551 1 year ago
I really like the Mig-29 but it is no where near as capable as the f-15c (in long range to medium range combat)
Sheen1400 1 year ago
Amazing fighter. Still a very formidable fighter in today's world.
Tyco200 1 year ago
mig 29 wat a very beautiful jet plane i lyn it ! furthermore sukhoi more awesome
warlseven 1 year ago
its very ugly warplane
DugiManiA 1 year ago
@DugiManiA How is it ugly????
SouthSurreyMilitia 1 year ago
I don't like the UB trainer paint job, but it looks pretty smart if you paint it right.
stalkingalizee 1 year ago
@DugiManiA
the only thing that is ugly in this url.. is your username your life
and your family..
the rest of the pretty and handsome ones are the rest around here
and the MiG-29
111i1011 1 year ago
@salman501
they use the main intakes when flying, and use the top ones when taxing along the tarmac,
basically its prevents F.O.D (foregn object damage) if a single bolt gets sucked into the main intakes it stuffs up the whole plane. Ingenius idea i reckon
andreypondrey10 1 year ago
migs are beautiful! stealth planes sux
ProthSteriel 1 year ago
can any one tell me why do those covers come on the intakes, what are they and what is there purpose thanks
salman501 1 year ago
@salman501 the mig 29 was designed to be able to do rough field operations to stop all the crap being sucked up and destroying the engines it was designed to cover the main intakes and take air in through its upper surfaces thus saving the engines
arkerry 1 year ago
@arkerry cheers
salman501 1 year ago
@salman501 Those intake doors slows down the air at super sonic speeds. If the aircraft is traveling at super sonic, the air would be traveling through the engine so fast that the it would have a really hard time keeping combustion. Those doors slow the air down just below super sonic speeds while keeping up with airpressure so that the engines have time to compress and ignite.
cesar333 1 year ago
@cesar333 yes thanks,
salman501 1 year ago
this is actially a cool plane i plan ontaking a ride in one
TheArbiter138 1 year ago
Who cares about American aircraft anymore the Russians & Chinese have won. Maybe we can trade some of those outdated aircarft carriers to the Chinese for all of the Bonds they hold. I would give them Hawaii too. Since the native Hawaiians now count themselves as part of the seemingly endless list of those aggreived by America. I suspect the Chinese will honor and respect the Native Hawaiian culture just like they do with Tibet.
homer63109 1 year ago
@homer63109 And what exactly have the chinese and russians won? Who makes the crappiest crap contest?
mikeyphoenix1 1 year ago
@mikeyphoenix1 Let's say, oh, Korea & Vietnam?
Korea was a draw for the yanks at the absolute most.
Vietnam..asses handed to you - on a silver platter.
Hollywood might make films that disagree, but in the real world the USA ran away, screaming like little girls.
lineswine 1 year ago
@lineswine Much like Afghanistan to the Russians. They were defeated by a bunch of bearded monkeys on donkeys lol
cesar333 1 year ago
@lineswine what? the wars still going on in Korea dude so how is it a draw? DERP DERP As for Hollywood they agree with you on Vietnam.
shabut 1 year ago
serbia have about 10 migs 29!
ThePavles 1 year ago
An awesome plane that blows the piece of shit F-14 out of the sky
Tomcatsux4ever 1 year ago
@Tomcatsux4ever *IF* the F-14 was still active, the PiG-29 would never even know what happened when a Phoenix blew it out of the sky. =)
Cajun76 1 year ago
Mate the F-14 was a piece of shit at dogfighting. Well actually it was a piece of shit in general anyway. When I saw "phoenix," I immediately laughed my ass off because it was a horrible missile from the start. Face it, the Mig-29,as a matter of fact, any plane, shits on the Fail-14, really badly
Sorry
Tomcatsux4ever 1 year ago
@Tomcatsux4ever Still turning and definitely burning in WWI biplanes I see. ;) F-14 role was not to mix it up, but fleet defense. Any plane? There's two Fitters sitting at the bottom of the Med that say otherwise. But as you seem to like hyperbole and fantastic claims: You haven't addressed the Tomcat's abilities in Guardian and Battloid Modes. :D
Cajun76 1 year ago
So fleet defense is what it really did...
It makes no difference really, the bottom line was that the F-14 is a worthless piece of shit. Why else would they shred them and dump them in the ocean like they piece of shit they are. LOL
Tomcatsux4ever 1 year ago
@Tomcatsux4ever Because they didn't want them to fall into Iranian hands? Too valuable to just sit in a boneyard? Their record against the Zentradi is clear though. They kick ass. :)
Cajun76 1 year ago
Mate they knew the F-14 was a piece of shit, not just because of Iran. Besides, Iran has F-4s, but you dont see them getting shredded dont you? That's because they knew the F-4 was not a piece of shit like the tomcrap was. LOL
Tomcatsux4ever 1 year ago
@Tomcatsux4ever The F-14 replaced the F-4, which is a dime a dozen. Iran can get F-4 parts anywhere. The best thing about the F-14 is *you* hate it and dedicate your time and energy to badmouthing it. F-14 wins. =)
Cajun76 1 year ago
Mate please. A lot of people hate F-14s because it was a piece of shit. Did you know that the F-14 getting shredded was the best thing to happen in aviation? It's not an opinion, it's the truth =)
Tomcatsux4ever 1 year ago
@Tomcatsux4ever Do you do drugs? The F-14 could fly faster, higher, further, and carry a greater weapons load than most fifther generation fighters being developed. This includes the SuperHornet, MiG35, F-22, and yes...even the short legged Eurofighter. The F-14 withough TV could achieve 80+ Alpha at close to mach 0.7. The Su-27 cannot do this even with empty weapons load. Plus the IAF achieve 146:1 kill ration...dumbass.
mikeyphoenix1 1 year ago
Comment removed
Tomcatsux4ever 1 year ago
@Tomcatsux4ever HAHA!!! I was hoping you'd say some stupid shit like that! This where I make you look even stupider than you really are. I'm about to light you ass up. So, according you to manuverability is the winning factor of air combat right? F6F Hellcat cold not out manuver a single INAF fighter yet had an unbeaten kill ratio of 19:1.
mikeyphoenix1 1 year ago
@Tomcatsux4ever The Hellcat proved to be the most successful aircraft in naval history, destroying 5,271 aircraft while in service with the U.S. Navy and U.S. Marine Corps (5,163 in the Pacific . But this is only the beginning. You see, manuverability is only one advantage. You can turn, but you cannot climb, or dive. This means you will die. Lack of range means lack of efficiency and time over target.
mikeyphoenix1 1 year ago
@Tomcatsux4ever Lack of weapons load means less fighting ability. You really are a stupid ass. Plus I've a got a video link here of an F/A-18 doing a cobra..and GUESS WHAT...with no thrust vectoring!!
mikeyphoenix1 1 year ago
@Tomcatsux4ever And by the way dumbass, anybody who's aware of the Tomcat's 146:1 kill ratio would know that by IAF i was referring to the Iran Air Force, not Isreali you jackass.
mikeyphoenix1 1 year ago
@Tomcatsux4ever The F-14 had great manuverabilty at any speed because its variable geometry wings were always in perfect position of to give the aircraft quick responce. That was the whole point of the wings, not just to save space. Also look at the cowlings (later added to the YF-17) and the pelvic fins. You don't know much about aerodynamics do you?
mikeyphoenix1 1 year ago
@mikeyphoenix1 Ha ha ha i like the way you replied to Tomcatsux4ever. The F-14 has a great maneuverability at any speed. May be you can take an F-14 and try to maneuver at a speed of 1 Mach. You can see your Balls come out of your mouth. And by the way Mr. Yankee, you can check the spelling of "Maneuverability" before making big comments. Ha ha ha , the way you write shows you know too much about aerodynamics.
Criticalmass235 1 year ago
@Criticalmass235 Yep, I have a bachelor's degree in aerospace engineering from ERAU, but because I misspelled one word means I don't know shit about aerodynamics. I type fast because I don't have all day to spend on this cluster fuck of a web site and impress morons like you and sux4ever. Oh, and by the way..."May be" is one word. Guess you don't anything about aerodynamics either. When I want lip from you I'll scrape it off my zipper. Love always...Mr. Yankee.
mikeyphoenix1 1 year ago
@mikeyphoenix1 Hi Yankee, I am not denying that you don't know shit about aerodynamics. Ha ha... I believe you know ONLY SHIT about aerodynamics. By the way the way you react to peoples comments, reflects the profile of your classic education.
Criticalmass235 1 year ago
@Criticalmass235 Sure it does. At least one of gets paid for our knowledge though. Peace.
mikeyphoenix1 1 year ago
buddy but in real dog fight f 15 shot down 18 mig 29 n f16 shot 2 but anyways su27 is much better then mig 29
316nadeem 1 year ago
Possibly in BVR but in a dog fight, the Mig 29 would actually be better than a vintage f-15 because of its HMS/missile.
gosciu555 1 year ago
@gosciu555 Probably yes but please remember untill there would be a dogfight... 120 would hit MiG first ;]
Boberrosini 1 year ago
too bad F15 breaks apart in mid air. Also indian air force was able to take out F15 & 16 with their su27 and mig 29 during training. This was a wakeup call for the USAF. You can google it also.
djsal510 2 years ago
@djsal510 The F-15 is 38 years old. It totally crushed the newer MiG29 in actual air-to-air combat. The MiG29s were newer and the pilots were verterans. They were trained by Russian MiG29 pilots for close to two years and only the most experienced combat veterans were allowed to fly them in combat. Not a single US F-15 pilot that shot them down had any experience. One F-15 broke up in mid air, but over 107 Soviet aircraft have been broken up by the F-15. Doesn't seem superior to me.
mikeyphoenix1 1 year ago
@djsal510 That's funny, because when I googled F-15 vs Mig 29 all I found were the reports of 16 MiG29s being shot down by F-15s and 6 being shot down by F-16s. And this was actual air-to-air combat, not exercises. And before you say that these were outdated MiG29s, remember that both the F-15 and F-16 are older aircraft.
mikeyphoenix1 1 year ago
@djsal510 that's why we have the raptor. I'll agree with asudewe, though. This plane is aesthetically amazing.
Underoathalex12 1 year ago
too bad it has been shot down by the all mighty, the best of the best, the king of the skies, the most feared, the killer of killer the f-15c eagle.
1658487 2 years ago
lol against russian pilots I think not!
Wckedone 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
HERE WE ARE
MAIDEN FLIGHT OF T-50
/watch?v=P0uS9arMJhs
Mig29tvc 2 years ago
Mig-29 is a copy of the F-15. Russians are good at that, but they designed it with short legs. The plane can only fly about 700 km or 430 miles on a single fill.
tim8461461 2 years ago
no its not!
clever50 2 years ago
Definitely is. It was released eight years after the 15 and looks identical. Similar flight characteristics too supposedly.
tim8461461 2 years ago
Its a short-range interceptor.
XXXMRcoolkidXXX 2 years ago
Now it is, however, in development they wanted long range. Obviously they didn't succeed. Great airplane either way.
tim8461461 2 years ago
No, its development was to make it short-range, it was never planned to have long range capabilities nor was it necessary for it to have them.
XXXMRcoolkidXXX 2 years ago
In 1969 the Soviet Union learned of the U.S. Air Force's "F-X" program, which resulted in the F-15 Eagle. The Soviet leadership soon realized that the new American fighter would represent a serious technological advantage over existing Soviet fighters. What was needed was a better-balanced fighter with both good agility and sophisticated systems.
tim8461461 2 years ago
In response, the Soviet General Staff issued a requirement for a Perspektivnyy Frontovoy Istrebitel (PFI, literally "Perspective Frontline Fighter", roughly "Advanced Frontline Fighter").[5] Specifications were extremely ambitious, calling for long range, good short-field performance (including the ability to use austere runways), excellent agility, Mach 2+ speed, and heavy armament. - Great Book of Moder Warplanes, Mike Spick
tim8461461 2 years ago
Russia attained this in the Su-37. Furthermore, I am fluent in Russian as it is my first language so you do not need to translate for me.
XXXMRcoolkidXXX 2 years ago
Wrong!
Reverendjim1 2 years ago
Woo go america how bout the ice hockey olympics back in the day, that must have hurt.??!?!??
KingofDaMntn 2 years ago
greetings from america. just because im from here dosent mean i hate russian jets. why cant the u.s. and russia be friends?
snubley 2 years ago
"Cant we all just get along" SHUTUP!!
Reverendjim1 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Russian planes have been demolished by US technology every time they went up against each other.
I'll take the F16 any day over any Russian flying crap.
lakeeriejew 2 years ago
Let's not forget that they never flew against the Russian pilots. And the Russians sold their planes to other countries which were probably not that experienced in flying them as the Russians are.
tiraspol17 2 years ago
Wrong. In the 1981 Syrian war, many of the pilots were Russian.
lakeeriejew 2 years ago
SUCK MY RUSSIAN C>>K CLOUN!!!!!
realnoriega58 2 years ago
Lebanese Forces bought 29 of theses
LOACHABLE 2 years ago
Bueno los Rusos ahora y antes la URSS siempre an tenida una tecnologia increible, es por eso que la Fuerza Aerea peruana tiene cazas RUSOS nada mas
apachito2710 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
.
CHRISTIANS OF THE WORLD DELIVERANCE IS COMING!
Seal yourself with holy spirit! Be holy, Root out your eyes for causing you to watch violence and pornography, cut away your sexual organs that lead you to adultery, sodomy, fornication, masturbation etc. Drink muriatic acid for smoking, abusing alcohol and drugs. Slit your throat for bowing to idols such as flag and crucifix. Do not attend church meetings, end Christendoom, restore Christian unity [Christianity], no church, no division!
.
conceil8 2 years ago
United states make more superior fighters that are more effect then the russians but i really like the design of the russians jets.
Mig1446 2 years ago
I think the most beautiful planes are russian.
The russian planes can beat the f15,16, and 18's but the f22 and 32 are the best.
The Eurofighter looks crappy.
Greets from Germany.
94Bluefire94 2 years ago
@94Bluefire94 I think Germans are the best fighter pilots in the world :) Red Baron and Erik Hartman!
But there is a better Russian fighter now that can beat F-22. It's Sukhoi PAK-FA T-50.
randominitializer 1 year ago
@randominitializer I know I saw the Video of the prototype.
I think they are equal.
I'm not a fan of the us as a German citizen. ;)
As an European guy.
But let be honest. The Russian forces are not good organised and the US forces are struggling in Iraq and Afghanistan. Just like the Israelis shooting and doing crimes. Bastards.
94Bluefire94 1 year ago
@randominitializer i agree. the pak fa would be an equal opponent for the raptor. but still thats assuming that it even gets put into production, and if the pilots get enough training. russian pilots dont get as much training as us pilots, but their jets are cooler in my opinion. and it may be several years until its even ready to be mass produced.
Mrfunkymonkey109 1 year ago
@Mrfunkymonkey109 there are quite a few Russian pilots who are considered some of the most expert and experienced fighter pilots in the world. Russia has a grueling pilot training program, a legacy of Soviet Air Force.
randominitializer 1 year ago
@94Bluefire94 you think thar but in 1999 on kosovo the serbs took down a f-?? hornet with a mig-21 that hadnt had a working radar.
StR8LuCkYSh0T 1 year ago
i agree. russian jets are beautiful
asudewe 2 years ago 30
@asudewe I always thought that too. They have much better lines.
trentondaniels 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Link:
/watch?v=yJl02345vgI
Real video 4 Su-27 vs 4 MiG-29
LIpetsk CPVL (Russian TOP GUN)
jufkujgjgu 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
The F-15 can knock any Russian plane off the sky .
FireMedicPolice 2 years ago