Dear Mr. Chad Kimball instead of saying things like Pawn to King's Knight three or Kings Rook to Rook four just say Queen to D2 or Rook H4. It helps players at all levels. If you want people to benefit from your so-called instructional chess videos plz stop narrating tales on basic chess pieces EXAMPLE OF WHAT ONE MUST NOT DO -----> Queen's third pawn to right hand side black king's white bishop )
2:59 Rd4 is not mate, only if black plays exd on the previous move. Slow down, you had plenty of time. It's not a race, it's supposed to be instruction and some weaker players are going to be watching.
Who cares what message it's in, I don't give a toss. Quite obviously you didn't post the vid, you are criticising it.
Im posting another criticism in a comment which is dealing with critcism. He meant to say play Rd4 ++ if black plays exd on the precious move. But some beginners can only see one move so he should say so in an instructional video.
Apparently, u have some major issues and a severe attitude problem. The reason we reply to vlogs and blogs is bcz we do give a ... And thus it is vital to reply to the right person, so that the message is conveyed and replied by back by the right person. Don't prance around like patzer messaging people randomly and pretending that you don't care. And if you really don't care why take initiative to waste time and reply ?
No, you are the one with the attitude problem. I never said that YOU said 2;59 is mate. I am making a remark on the poor commentary and I'm going to do it where I damn well like under a comment also speaking about the same issue if I so choose. So don't put words into my mouth or tell me me how to use You Tube thanks very much.
An intense case of bad attitude ---> "Who cares what message it's in" , " I'm going to do it where I damn well like" If you have carefully examined the above statements they spell nothing but bad attitude. Don't expect the world 2 tolerate that kinda bull shyt. Apparently, no 1 likes you even on your profile page on YouTube, something must be terribly wrong with u or with us (the entire world).
You have clearly lost the argument because now you are simply changing the subject. All you can do is refer to my profile or try to make cheap personal insults both of which are irrelevant, and neither of which I have stooped to doing myself.
I'm focusing on the facts here. I posted a valid comment about the commentary to the video pointing out an error. I did not say that you made the comment or that you made the video. Therefore you are WRONG on both counts and I have won the debate. QED.
Dear Mr. Chad Kimball instead of saying things like Pawn to King's Knight three or Kings Rook to Rook four just say Queen to D2 or Rook H4. It helps players at all levels. If you want people to benefit from your so-called instructional chess videos plz stop narrating tales on basic chess pieces EXAMPLE OF WHAT ONE MUST NOT DO -----> Queen's third pawn to right hand side black king's white bishop )
reaganpinto 2 years ago
2:59 Rd4 is not mate, only if black plays exd on the previous move. Slow down, you had plenty of time. It's not a race, it's supposed to be instruction and some weaker players are going to be watching.
CaraBrimleyRules 2 years ago
You posted a reply to the wrong message, I am not the person who posted this video and definitely DID NOT SAY 2:59 was mate.!
reaganpinto 2 years ago
Who cares what message it's in, I don't give a toss. Quite obviously you didn't post the vid, you are criticising it.
Im posting another criticism in a comment which is dealing with critcism. He meant to say play Rd4 ++ if black plays exd on the precious move. But some beginners can only see one move so he should say so in an instructional video.
CaraBrimleyRules 2 years ago
Apparently, u have some major issues and a severe attitude problem. The reason we reply to vlogs and blogs is bcz we do give a ... And thus it is vital to reply to the right person, so that the message is conveyed and replied by back by the right person. Don't prance around like patzer messaging people randomly and pretending that you don't care. And if you really don't care why take initiative to waste time and reply ?
reaganpinto 2 years ago
No, you are the one with the attitude problem. I never said that YOU said 2;59 is mate. I am making a remark on the poor commentary and I'm going to do it where I damn well like under a comment also speaking about the same issue if I so choose. So don't put words into my mouth or tell me me how to use You Tube thanks very much.
CaraBrimleyRules 2 years ago
An intense case of bad attitude ---> "Who cares what message it's in" , " I'm going to do it where I damn well like" If you have carefully examined the above statements they spell nothing but bad attitude. Don't expect the world 2 tolerate that kinda bull shyt. Apparently, no 1 likes you even on your profile page on YouTube, something must be terribly wrong with u or with us (the entire world).
reaganpinto 2 years ago
You have clearly lost the argument because now you are simply changing the subject. All you can do is refer to my profile or try to make cheap personal insults both of which are irrelevant, and neither of which I have stooped to doing myself.
I'm focusing on the facts here. I posted a valid comment about the commentary to the video pointing out an error. I did not say that you made the comment or that you made the video. Therefore you are WRONG on both counts and I have won the debate. QED.
CaraBrimleyRules 2 years ago
boahhh NICEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
orientalboy2000 2 years ago
great!
solsek7 4 years ago